architecture portfolio | angelika hinterbrandner

u n c l o s e m e

2o 16

graduate por tfolio &

2o 12

professional work

portfolio & cv angelika hinterbrandner

who am I? Hi, I am angelika. I am 24 years old. I was born in a small Bavarian village in Germany. After living & working in Berlin, Rotterdam and Hong Kong, I am currently finishing my last design Studio at the Graz University of Technology. Before starting to write my thesis on informal urban living structures in the backdrop of today‘s complex intertwining political and economic world.

I am in love with coffee — espresso doppio black — travelling, architecture and urbanism, design, music, cities, the underwater world, photography and life.

To discover & to be surprised is what drives me in life. That‘s why I am eager to learn something new every day. I am more than proud & probably blushing when my friends call me an inspirational, open-minded person.

Before I am starting my thesis and hence, last year in academic surroundings, I am searching for another exciting and challenging hands-on experience.

I‘d love to work with you.

cover photo: materiality & texture explorative model study angelika hinterbrandner hong kong | february 2o16

angelika hinterbrandner c u r r i c u l u m

v i t a e

e d u c a t i o n

2o16 — current graz university of technology masters degree in architecture 2o15 — 2o16 chinese university of hong kong masters degree in architecture & urbanism 2o11— 2o15 graz university of technology bachelors degree in architecture 2oo2 — 2o11 europäisches gymnasium berchtesgaden honors courses in music & spanish

w o r k e x p e r i e n c e

s o f t w a r e s k i l l s

2o16 — current teaching assistant at the institute for design and architectural typologies [tu graz] assisting with teaching preparations, during lectures and design studios

revit autocad rhino 5 grasshopper 3ds max

••••• •••• •••• •• ••

illustrator photoshop indesign lightroom

••••• ••••• ••••• •••

– note: from 2o13 with breaks due to studying & working abroad

2o16 — current project assistant at the sustainability assessment of the institute of technology & testing of construction materials [tu graz] current project IEA EBC annex 57 2o14 — current freelance work in the fields of graphic design, print, editing as well as competition work 2o14 freelance writer at B A U M E I S T E R 2o14 internship at mvrdv rotterdam working on competitions including an on site project as part of the BAUMEISTER scholarship

c o n t a c t

p +43 660 37 8484 9 m angelika@ahinterbrandner.com w ahinterbrandner.com ahinterbrandner

2o13 | 2o11 internship at gkk+architekten berlin working with main focus on commissions, layout and image editing 2o12 | 2o11 internship at hinteregger&söhne assisting with tenders, cost callculation & client contact

a d d — o n

2o16 — current D E T A I L scholarship 2o15 — 2o16 refugee art movement core team art project for integration, with and for refugees in hong kong 2o15 Joint study scholarship | tu graz

basic coding knowledge html, css, python •

2o14 B A U M E I S T E R scholarship

windows os user survival mac os knowledge

2o12 — 2o15 StudentenTrainerProjekt | tu graz head of team conducting Autodesk Revit tutorials from beginner to advanced level

– note: I am not working with the program you are using in your in studio?

Just let me know, I am happy to learn something new.

i n t e r e s t

travelling, yoga & meditation, reading, scuba diving, electronic music & art, photography, politics

2oo9 & 2oo5 participation in ›jugend musiziert‹ solo and ensemble, laureate in the national finals

•

l a n g u a g e s

german english level spanisch cantonese

native speaker c1— c2 a2 — b1 survival kit

– I‘d like to learn french & italian

2o 16

part o1 of my bachelor thesis

The aim of the project was to design a building for a new music school in Graz, which needed to fit in the narrow space between two existing buildings.

We decided to develop an ecologically sensitive design based on a wooden structure, without losing sight of strong requirements for a design that offers remarkable room for the students as well as for the inhabitants.

construction based design studio In cooperation with: Julia Kaltenegger

3

With elegance and simplicity this design proposal aims to provide a new impact on park lackenbachs connection to visitors. Attracting not only guests comeing from the draisine tour, but as well visitors of the museum, the park is becoming the new attraction in the middle of nature.

2nd prize winner of the internal competition design — 1st prize winner concept In cooperation with: Eva Walchhofer

c o n t e n t

p e r f o r m a t i v e & p a r t i c i p a t o r y

k

2

W OO D W ORM

A revitalizing utilization conceptthat is not just focusing on the new gallery that needed to be designed for Gerlad Brettschuh but as well on the aspects of slow tourism and social regional aspects forms the core of this project.

h o u s e

A project that focuses particularly on the problem of rural vacancies that are growing in Austria at the moment.

undergraduate

F e ls A m H a u S

1

4

Tsi Ni Tang is a soon to be art village in the Guangzhou district. Local Artists, that are already working at the empty warehouse area want to revive and redevelop the old industrial site. This is a proposal for the redevelopment of one of the sites‘ empty warehouses.

The design focuses on the exploration of the combination, integration and new interpretation of old and new. The strong implemented free form stands as a juxtaposition placed in the building.

It attracts with tempting but invisible qualities from the outside, next to the bare old concrete ruin that is stripped down to few left horizontal and vertical elements that have its very own magic.

Selected for the cuhk honors review — as one of the best four m1 studio projects of the year

Proposal for the Kowloon City Bay Area in Hong Kong for a new and proactively planned cultural landscape pointing towards a new Habitat City, where sustainable livings and cultural & ecological diversities should be encouraged and combined.

Selected for the final exhibition of the best m1 projects of the winter term nominated for the piranesi student award 2o16

What is our future city going to look like? Can we learn from slum structures? How can we imporve informal living situations?

And most important: Can architecture change society?

masterthesis proposal & current research interest on informal living structures & density

FE L D H Ă„ U S ER

TO W ER PO L I TE

Growing slums, exploding cities and the upcoming rise of informal urban districts are global relevant topics of the future - just like the increasing number of potentially destabilizing floods of refugees and conflicting situations all over the world due to political destabilization.

7

For a long time the gasometer area in Vienna has been a forgotten between the city and the airport.

The new tower forms part of an operation to intensify the area and to reconnect it with the surroundings and the city. This proposal seeks to fill the urban voids around the gasometer with new program and mark the site with a higher volume.

1st prize winner of the competition Participation throughout the competition phase of the project.

recent work

“You enter the island as it were, you enter another world. Green space surrounds you. You can feel the vibrant city, while exploring new spaces and quiet corners. Stepping into your new home in harmony with water and the city.�

professional work

n e t w o r k [ i n ] f o r m al

I S L A N D T H E

5

6

8

Instead of the monolithic housing block described by the brief, MVRDV created a permeable courtyard block.

The 16 different housing types, which vary in size and from one to four floors, provide an incredibly diverse variety of accomodation for different types of inhabitants.

Participation throughout the submission planning of the project.

H a u s

A m

F e l s

QuickInfo Design Studio 4 Part o1 of the bachelor thesis Institute for Design and Architectural Typologies 2o14/2o15

01 ∙ site plan 1:1000

bachelor thesis

Type: Refurbishment / Planning in regional Context Program: Mixed use atelier & exhibition space Usable Space: 750m2 Location: Arnfels, Austria

1 02 ∙ the existing building

„Rural Life“ - a term that is not attractive to most of the people nowadays.

More and more residents - especially young people - of the countryside are moving to urban areas.

A lot of communes are struggling with vacancies. The demographic change enhances this effect even.

Politics recognized the need of action meanwhile and were planning to strengthen rural centers. Exactly this context can be found as well in

Arnfels: The small village close to the Slovenian border is left vacant in the very center of the village.

This concept proposes an idea how to encounter this issue of migration.

It is an idea that does not just want to implement something new but primarily strengthen the village with already existing qualities.

The main focus points are art_culture, slow tourism, and social_regional aspects.

03 ∙ figure ground plan arnfels

bachelor thesis

01 02 03 04

∙ ∙ ∙ ∙

formfinding process section & elevation atmosphere at the barn utilization concept

01 ∙ 03

∙ 02 ∙ 04 ∙

art_culture The main design intervention and new interpretation of the building are made to integrate the gallery.

The „parasite“ that grows out of house 15 leads the visitors upstairs and from the upper level of house 14. The currently incoherent buildings are as a result of this connected in a new - built as well as a functional way. slow_tourism To fill the „Haus am Fels“ with life again, there two other substantive ideas to supplement the gallery function. One is the tourism aspect.

The empty barn at the backside of the two houses has a unique atmosphere close to the rock. This atmos-

phere is perfect for small rooms that can be rented to visiting guests. social_regional The second aspect to revive the building in a long-lasting way is the social-regional aspect. The idea is to integrate the residents of Arnfels.

With different social-sustainable projects like the already existing „Klapothek“, or „Kama“ this can happen. For a more detailed view on the utilization concept, have a look at the diagram below.

With the combination of this three aspects, a complete package should arise that attracts visitors as well as residents. The revitalization of Arnfels is just possible with as many parties involved as possible.

Bestand + Abriss

„ D e r Pa ra s i t “ Vo l u m e n w i r d h i n z u g e f ü g t

kunst_kultur sozial_regional s l ow _ t o u r i s m D i e z we i t e H ü l l e Eine neue Atmosphäre entsteht

Die Funktionen

„ D e r Pa ra s i t “ Vo l u m e n w i r d h i n z u g e f ü g t

kunst_kultur sozial_regional s l ow _ t o u r i s m

bachelor thesis

Die Funktionen

01 ∙ concept diagrams 02 ∙ plan drawings ground and 1st floor

01 ∙ 02 ∙ 03 ∙

03 ∙ looking inside the parasite

h o u s e

k

2570/2 7G 2568

QuickInfo

2573 2567

1

2570/1 2566 3G

01 ∙ siteplan Program: cultural use, housing Scale: 800m2 Location: Graz, Austria

2565 3

2

Regenwasserversickerung am Grundstück

4

.4 21 13

2564 3G +0.10

8

se gas ran Me

— Focus: Execution plan drawings, ready to be handed in for permission. The project was fully drawn as a team project in Autodesk Revit.

R 3 pa rte 0.0 0 ie m ns te llu ng

Task: Construction Design Studio Institut for architecture technology tu graz ∙ summer term 2o15

5

Bau

2563/2 3G

2557 3G 6

7

ze ren ksg tüc nds u r G

n nzli gre

ie

2572 3G

1G

.68 891 ‐0.05

9

2559 3G

2571 3G

43

3G 8 ±0.00

2563/3 3G

39

2562 4G 37 steig Ge h

2561

2563/2 3G

nie htli fluc Bau

GG 0 G 4% 15 ‐1.8 DN 31.9 ND B‐ 650 1 / 00 11 ‐0.08 DN

100

GG

2 187

35

e raß thst abe Elis

The sculptural stair in the middle a remarkable and exciting space – while 0the rooms inside the buil1 11 ding are comfortable and cosy.

provides 108 3G

se

We decided to develop an ecologically sensitive design based on a wooden structure, without losing sight of our strong requirements for a design that offers remarkable room for the students as well as for the inhabitants of the penthouse.

141 3G

gas ran Me

The aim of the project was to design a building for a new music school in 36 Graz, which needed to fit into the narrow space between two existing buildings.

38

A large emphasis was also placed on the details we developed. The objective here was to use innovative, yet simple products – such as sheep’s wool and clay construction boards, ensuring that it is environmentally friendly as well as providing a nice interior climate.

steig Ge h

41 ±0.00

Höhenfixpunkt Kanaldeckel +364.44 üNN = ‐0.06 SH 358.99 üNN +5.45

40

42

143 4G

142 4G

2

2

02 ∙ part of the facade section 1:20

arge konstruieren_4

KA.os architekten+partner I 1490 IAT tugraz rechbauerstrasse 12, 8010 graz

titel:

Unnamed stand:

05.09.2015 17:48:43 plan nr 20.08 format:

maßstab:

420x297 projekt:

haus der musik elisabethstrasse 40 8010 graz grundeigentümer:

1490 IAT management AG rechbauerstrasse 12/I 8010 graz gesuchsteller | bauherr:

institut für architekturtechnologie rechbauerstrasse 12/I 8010 graz architekten:

KA.os architekten+partner, rechbauerstrasse 12 8010 graz visum architekt: Checker

vorabzug! ind

gezeichnet:

beschreibung

kal, hin

dat

alle maße sind am bau zu prüfen! ±0.00 = 364.50 üNN = FFOK

01 ∙ 3d model showing the

three building parts 02 ∙ stairs in detail 03 ∙ ground floor plan

01 ∙ 02 ∙ 03 ∙

meterriss

230.00

01 ∙ cut out of the facade section 1:20

geländerhöhe = 110 cm

de.05 2. OG

6.40

6.40 m

6.08 m

5.66 m

detail 60.72

wa.01

meterriss

4.36 m

detail 60.71

1. OG

3.36

3.36 m

2.95 m detail 60.05

2.30 m

10.29 m² lrh 3.26 m

10.29 m² lrh 3.26 m

ffok +6.40 m rdok +6.32 m rduk +6.10 m fduk +6.08 m

wa.01

ffok +6.40 m rdok +6.32 m rduk +6.10 m fduk +6.08 m

wa.01

de.02

02

podest fertigbetonelement

6.32 m

m 6.10 m

2.20 22.00 8.00

m

podest 6.40 m fertigbetonelement

5.66 m

6.15 m

6.15 m

5.66 m

5.66 m

detail 60.64

271.80

304.00

detail 60.64

6.40 m

wa.05

wa.05 wa.01

wa.01

18. 1. OG

wc

estrich poliert 2.12 m² lrh 2.72 m

ffok +3.36 m rdok +3.28 m rduk +3.08 m fduk +2.95 m

de.05

05

podest fertigbetonelement

3.28 m

3.06 m

m

gefälle 1.5 %podest fertigbetonelement

gefälle 1.5 %

10.80 22.00 8.00

m

detail 60.63

detail 60.63 detail 60.38

detail 60.38

w o o d w o r m QuickInfo Task: Design Studio Special Topic ›Espez‹ Institut of architecture and media tu graz ∙ summer term 2o15 01 ∙ top view ∙ model Typology: Parametric design of a wooden structutre ∙ design to production project Program: Mixed-Use Pavillion Scale: 50m2 Location: Schloss Lackenbach, Austria — Focus: Digital Fabrication with wood ›Design to production‹ studio. Robotics as well as basic programming knowledge were core elements of the course.

With elegance and simplicity this design proposal aims to provide a new impact on park lackenbachs connection to visitors. Attracting not only guests comeing from the draisine tour, but as well visitors of the museum, the park is becoming the new attraction in the middle of nature.

The wooden canopys - all made of the same structure - can vary in use. For kids there is the researchers pavillion, for grownups further information about nature or a place for barbecue.

02 ∙ two pavillions in use ∙ model

03 ∙ wooden structure in detail ∙ model

3

reviving ∙ garden The garden as new main focus on the site, needs to be usable especially during spring and summer time. So the pavillions provide shade with some textile coverings, that can be added easily or a green roof, that connects the pavillions even more to the site.

01 ∙ design aspects ∙ model 02 ∙ landscape concept 03 ∙ in the garden ∙ visualization

02 ∙ 01 ∙ 03 ∙

p e rf o r m ati v e & p arti c i p at o r y QuickInfo Task: Digital Design Studio m1 studio cuhk ∙ summer term 2o16 Typology: Theater Program: Dance and performance art facilities & shared public ground floor for communal use Scale: 8.000m2 Location: Tsi Ni Tang, Guangzhou, PRC

01 ∙ urban context ∙ tsi ni tang art village

— Focus: Combination of digital and analog workflows.

Including robotics, revit, rhino, 3ds max, grasshopper & variouse ways of analog model building

4

When working with an existing building, the first thing I usually do is trying to perceive as much as possible. It takes some time to get a first impression of the mood, vibe, and story of a place. Especially if it is such a special one as the empty factory at Tsi Ni Tang, we were

02 ∙ the existing

able to work with for this project.

The studio was set up in three different phases. In the first phase, we explored different ways of model making on a topic we had to pick according to our personal interests.

During the second phase, we focused on the urban context of the soon to be Tsi Ni Tang Art Village.

We did a comparative research on art villages in the Asian context and developed an urban strategy for the site.

After a one-week robotics workshop where we had the chance to explore the possibilities of digital fabrication, we started the design phase combining all learnings from the previous phases.

— The design itself is focusing on the exploration of the combination, integration and new interpretation of old and new. The strong implemented free form stands as a juxtaposition positioned in the building. It attracts with tempting but invisible qualities from the outside, next to the bare old concrete ruin that is stripped down to few left horizontal and vertical elements that have its very own magic.

03 ∙ atmospheric inspiration dance, form, performance

phase o1 — explorative model making During the introduction phase of the studio — leaving the context of the existing out of our mind for a while — I focused on soft textile appearing textures, solidified movement and contradiction in appearance and perception. I explored different materials and several ways of model making — but especially atmospheric qualities, that I reintegrate in the final design process.

01

02 03

∙ explorative model building texture, form, atmosphere ∙ the existing ∙ concept & program development

01 ∙ 03 ∙ 02 ∙

user groups

the local

the guangzhou art addict

the art-tourist

1

2

3

wants:

wants:

wants:

everyday leisure

a special weekend

an extraordinary event

high quality art events

accesibility

connection of leisure+art

phase o2 — concept

45min by car

1h 45min by car

development

10-15min by bike

What is the quality of the existing? How does something new need to look like to exist besides or within this particular context without losing its power? Or is it even possible to create a new context? This were some of the main questions that I tried to answer within the design process.

2o16

2o17+

2o2o+

phase 01

phase 01+

phase 02

community engagement & dance school

meeting point for local art, dance & performance

art level + international art profile

Further the project aims to explore the potential of connecting common uses for the local community with performing arts and dance.

RDOOTOU EGATS

BLACK BOX

PE R F O R M A NCE

G R A N D T H E AT E R

FOYER

BAR ENTRÈ T H E AT E R F A C I L I T I ES

MOVE & D A NCE Kids|area OFFICE workshop STAGE OUTDOOR KITCHEN&DIY cafÈ mediacenter

phase o3 — design Besides the external impact of the newly introduced shape, the inner qualities of the shell were one primary focus. The envelope is filtering the light softly from the outside and adds various interesting pouche‘ spaces, that can be used for example as the foyer of the theater.

01 02 03 04

∙ ∙ ∙ ∙

southern elevation axonometric view model photos groundfloorplan & section aa

01 ∙ 02 ∙ 04 ∙ 03 ∙

5

th e QuickInfo Task: Urban Design Studio m1 studio cuhk ∙ winter term 2o15/2o16 Program: Diverse new urban district with mixed use facilities

i s l a n d

01 ∙ siteplan with program analysis ∙ use comparison in 1960 and 2013

Masterplan Site: 600.000m2 Location: New Terretorries, Hong Kong People: 60.000 Land use: 40% Plot ratio: 4,2 — Please Note: Besides the research in the very beginning of the project this studio was an individual project. The project was developed in four different scales from 1:3000 urban scale down to 1:50 living unit scale. Due to the wide range of produced output here can‘t be shown everything.

The aim is to explore architectural and urban design alternatives through a focused investigation of e-pathy habitat that addresses the social agenda ofsection a livability, affordability, empathy and resilience.

The studio is research-based andsection b trying to investigate new options of urban planning and living for the Kowloon City Bay Area.

22.0 m

25.0 m

33.0 m

25.0 m

section c

02 ∙ hight study section d

27.0 m

44.0 m

5 03 ∙ „You enter the island, as it were you enter a new world.“ an attempt to fullfill forgoten citizens desires | the island

o1

o2

o3

o4

o5

blick

erschließung

natur

wasser

menschen

¾ dezente integration in höhenlinie ohne verstecken ¾ neue typologie die der insel eine eigene identität verleiht in kombination mit bekannten bautypen

¾ zugang zu den inseln über brücken, das fähren netz und über die neu entwickelte öffentliche verkehrs axe ¾ neu entwicklung der abgetrennten uferzone - öffentlicher verkehrsknoten+

¾ großzügige & unberührte grünräume ¾ zentraler osmotischer grün-ring wächst und schrumpft symbolhaft für natur ¾ cohabitat von mensch, tier & natur

¾ wiederbelebung des wassers als lebensraum ¾ neues archipel, das bekanntes, aber vergessenes wieder aufnimmt: fischerdorfstruktur, leben mit dem wasser

¾ unterschiedliche wohntypologien bieten unterschiedliche lebens räume ¾ mega strukturen als neuer ansatz für dichte & gemeinschaftliches wohnen

01 ∙ site analysis with

integrated first proposal 02 ∙ research on reclamation,

housing & typologie

01 ∙ 02 ∙

the typologies different building types are used for a diverse building mix on the island: a floating island?

o1 superblock o2 village o3 floating fishfarm o4 the organic growing green center

how could a floating island look like? | four different floating options: o1 conventional reclamation o2 light floating structure o3 offshore structure with fixed foundation o4 new reclamation technique - flexible and organic growing, rebuildable concrete elements

how do we wanna live?

reclamation in the sha tin area as hong kong’s land reserves are very rare the government is reclaiming land from the sea. development of the site area from the paddy lands in the ‘60s to today’s look of sha tin

Hong Kong is famous for its incredible density. When it comes to housing 12.2 m2 living area per person average.

What can we as architects do to improve the housing situation? A study on living space.

A

B 6,46

C

2,00

D 6,54

E 3,61

F 8,10

G 8,10

H 9,08

I 8,10

J 8,10

K 8,10

L 5,81

M 6,54

N

2,00

O 6,46

24

2,20 0

2,20 0 6,83 3

22

6,83 3

23

5,97 7

5,97 7

24

8,35 5 9,08 8 8,10 0

19 9 8,10 0

19 9

18 8 8,10 0

8,10 0

18 8

8,10 0

17 7 8,10 0

17 7

16 6 8,15 5

8,15 5

16 6

15 5 8,05 5

8,05 5

15 5

8,10 0

14 4 8,10 0

14 4

7,98 8

13 3 7,98 8

13 3

9,08 8

12 2

9,08 8

12 2

7,25 5

11 7,25 5

11

8,10 0

10 0 8,10 0

10 0

8,10 0

9 8,10 0

9

8,10 0

8 8,10 0

8

8,10 0

7 8,10 0

7

8,10 0

6 8,10 0

6

8,17 7

5 8,17 7

5

2,20 0

1

A

∙ concept development ∙ superblock | within the context, typical floor & section ∙ superblock | typical floor in detail

2

1

6,46

01 02

03

3

6,83 3

6,83 3

2,20 0

5,97 7

4 5,97 7

4

2

22

20

9,08 8

20

3

23

21 8,35 5

21

2,00

B

C

6,54

3,61

D

8,10

E

8,10

F

9,08

G

8,10

H

8,10

I

8,10

J

5,81

K

6,54

L

2,00

M

N

6,46

O

01 ∙

02 ∙ 03 ∙

A

B 6,46

C 2,00

D 6,54

E 3,61

5,97

24

2,20

23

6,83

22

8,35

21

20

9,08

20

E

19

8,10

19

18

8,10

18

17

8,10

17

[ i n ] f o r m a l n e t w o rk l e ar n i n g fr o m s l u m ?

QuickInfo Preproposal for my Masterthesis, based on several research questions, as the followings: — What is our future city going to look like?

— Can we learn from slum structures?

— How can we imporve informal living situations?

Growing slums, exploding cities and the upcoming rise of informal urban districts are global relevant topics — just like the increasing number of potentially destabilizing floods of refugees and conflicting situations all over the world due to political destabilization.

For us in Europe this seemed to be far away. But our daily life is influenced by globalization as well as by migration. Or better:

master thesis proposal

The world is changing now. Today there are thousands of people on their way fleeing to a better world, a better place, a new home.

The fact, that our daily life is characterized by the city, which is already today accommodating one half of the global population, is not surprising. But that 2050 — according to common forecasts — one out of three persons is going to live informal is shocking.

This raises the question of whether we are going to be prepared for the upcoming precarious living conditions and limited space or not.

Here the proposed project intervenes: There are slum-structures that have become well-established.

For example the favelas of Rio de Janeiro, whose are offering a fixed social structure for its inhabitants.

As problematic as the infrastructural situation is in this minimal housing structures might be, the whole network is still providing a home and social security similar to a big family.

What more can you learn from this structures and how can one extract the positive aspects of the built reality? Is it possible to re-use or reinterpret the positive intervoven network of the slum?

Starting with this research questions, I want to develop a concept, which provides a catalog of possible reactions on upcoming masses of refugees coming to European cities.

From a small shelter cell to the integration of new inhabitants to an urban network. Focusing not just on a built result but more on socio-cultural questions that need to be answered.

01 ∙ the city of the future?

6

th e

p o l it e

t o w e r

01 ∙ view public space QuickInfo Task: Competition Gate2 ∙ Highrise office and residential building Competition phase FebruaryJuly ‘14 Typology: High-rise Program: Flexible use office and housing Scale: 32.000 m2 Location: Vienna, Austria Team: Winy Maas, Fokke Moerel, Luca Moscelli, Angelika Hinterbrandner [mvrdv] — Focus: Competition Phase 01 design & form development, site plan & surroundings, ground floor plans, diagramatic work.

For a long time the gasometer area in Vienna has been a forgotten between the city and the airport.

The new tower forms part of an operation to intensify the area and to reconnect it with the surroundings and the city.

This proposal seeks to fill the urban voids around the gasometer with new program and mark the site with a higher volume. What form can this tower take in order to express the current needs of the site?

7

02 ∙ site plan

It should be a tower that has learned and progressed from earlier single towers. Can it be programmed in a truly flexible manner so that it can easily adapt to its circumstances? Can it be a tower that can even be polite to its neigbhours by avoiding casting a shadow? A polite tower after an epoch of selfishness?

As the tower is to be used as offices as well as housing demands an asymmetrical floor plan to limit the amount of north facing apartments. The most demanding use will dictate the size and proportion of the units.

The towers „office“ capacity would allow the residents to throw a large party.

03 ∙ view döbelhofstraße

03 ∙ model photo

the hour-glass figure An elegant hour-glass figure emerged that responds to the surroundings and open views towards the Gasometers. The design for the plaza around the tower can be seen like a gigantic sundial on which the two hour shadow cast can be followed throughout the day.

Technik

Terrassen

Terrassen

Urban Lobby

Eingangsbereich

Aufzüge mit Lobby

Parken und Technik

Bestehende Rampe UG2

01 02 03 04

∙ ∙ ∙ ∙

section ground floor plan diagrams storyline floor plans office

02 ∙ 03 01 ∙ 04 ∙

kommunikative Sitzgelegenheiten

110 m 95 m 85 m

Neuer öffentlicher Platz mit Belichtungssystem

110 m

Richtung Döbelhoferstraße MGC-Plaza

28m 36 m 18 m

36 m

53 m

Permeabler Bodenbelag im Bedarfsfall

Zug

ang

U3

Ga so

me ter

26 m

Restaurant Ein

gan

Grünraum mit Bänken

gsb

ere

ich

Außenbereich Restaurant Café Au

fzü g Lob e mit by

Haltebucht

Sti eg Do enha pp eltr us m epp it e

sfa

hr Tie t und fga E rag ing e ang

urban Lobby

Aufenthaltsbereich+ Kommunikation

Flu

Au

chtw

eg

sonniger Platz

U-Bahn Vorplatz

Ros

a-Fis

che

r-Ga

sse

Fahrrad-Parkplatz 150 Stellplätze

Wiener Berge

Dö

ble

rh

ofs

Gasometer

tra

Stephansdom

Prater

ße

schwebender Himmel Terrassen

01 ∙ model photo with context

f e l d h Ä u s e r

e m m e n

QuickInfo Task: Submission Planning ∙ Urban Hybrid May - July 2014

W 01

W 02

7.5 m² 8.0 m²

3.4 m²

W 02

m 11.5 m²

17.2 m²

8.0 m²

3.4 m²

9.2 m²

W 02

10.8 m²

7.5 m²

28.7 m²

m 2.9 m² 2.44 m²

W 01

m 11.5 m²

17.2 m²

7.0 m²

m 3 6 m² 3.6

7.0 m²

34.8 m²

m 2.9 m² 2.44 m²

7

2 m² 2.6

W 03

2 m² 2.6

m²² 1.66 m

6.4 m²

14.9 m²

7.3 m²

32.3 m²

2.0 m² 21.7 m²

5.4 m²

4.5 m²

14.9 m²

EG

MF-02 8 Einheiten HNF: 592 m2

32.3 m²

4.5 m²

10.5 m²

26.2 m² 2.2 m²

5.8 m² 5.5 m²

2.0 m² 27.4 m²

12.5 m²

10.5 m²

7

EG

5.8 m² 5.5 m²

12.5 m²

77.90 M2

RG

6

RG

W 01

W 01 28.5 m²

28.5 m² 8.2 m²

W 01

W 01

7.8 m²

2.9 m²

18.8 m²

3.5 m²

3.2 m²

9.6 m²

W 02 4.9 m² W 02

5.4 m²

3.8 m²

2.0

19.1 m²

W 03

W 03

MF-04 16 Einheiten HNF: 814 m2

8.6 m²

24.3 m²

4.0 m²

5.5 m²

3.0 m²

M2

3.0 m²

3.2 m²

5.3 m²

6.9 m²

6.9 m²

3.2 m²

9.6 m²

1.7 m²

1.7 m² 18.8 m²

2.4 m²

W 04

2.4 m²

W 04 2.8 m²

8.2 m² 12.5 m²

W 03

5.3 m²

9.6 m²

M2 18.8 m²

5.5 m²

3.5 m²

24.6 m²

5.7 m²

2.0

2.0

6.3 m²

W 02 3.7 m²

M2

W 03

10.5 m² 9.5 m²

6.3 m²

W 02

12.5 m²

29.2 m²

5.7 m²

8.2 m²

10.5 m² 7.4 m²

M2

7.8 m²

2.9 m²

12.5 m²

29.2 m²

8.2 m²

30.9 m²

2.8 m²

30.9 m²

12.5 m²

40.6 m²

10.0 m²

10.0 m²

40.6 m² 7.8 m²

7.8 m²

4.7 m²

4.7 m²

EG

RG

1.1

RG

6.3 m²

5.0 m²

1.2

10.3 m²

W 02

W 01

W 02

W 01

3.6 m² 2.2 m² 2.9 m²

3.6 m² 2.2 m²

9.9 m²

13.1 m²

5.9 m²

24.1 m²

21.3 m²

1.0 m²

4.5 m²

3.1 m²

3.1 m²

13.1 m²

5.9 m²

24.1 m²

EF-S-01-P Fläche: 8 x 5 m, HNF: 70.6 m2 Anzahl: 4

4.5 m²

4.5 m²

7.0 m²

14.0 m²

EF-M-03 Fläche: 23,5 x 4 m HNF: 116,5 m2 Anzahl: 3

4.5 m²

3.2 m²

3.2 m²

MF-05 9 Einheiten HNF: 482.3 m2

9.9 m² 1.0 m²

7.0 m² 11.5 m²

17.7 m²

EF-S-02-P Fläche: 10 x 4 m HNF: 71.7 m2 Anzahl: 2

1.7

3.2 m²

8.6 m²

8.6 m²

8.6 m²

5.3 m²

m 3.4 3.6 m² 3 m²

8.4 m² 8.4 m²

m²² 3.5 m² 36 m 3.6

1.6

m²² 33.6 3. .6 m

8.4 m²

1.7

7.6 m² m 3. m² 3.6

1.7

1.9 m² 3.2 m² m 3.6 . m²

3.6 m²

3.5 m²

1.6

2.4 m²

8.6 m²

3.2 m² m 3.6 . m²

3.6 m²

11.2 m²

11.2 m²

11.3 m²

11.1 m²

11.2 m²

EF-S-03-P Fläche: 7.5 x 4 m HNF: 79.5 m2 Anzahl: 1

11.3 m²

8.6 m²

8.6 11.4 m²

8.6 m²

11.3 m²

5.4 m² 33.66 m² 3.6 m² 3.2 m²

33.66 m²

3.5 m² 2.8 m²

3. m² 33.66 m² 3.2

3.4 m²

27.2 m²

15.0 m²

10.3 m²

15.9 m² 18.1 m²

33.66 m² 6.5 m²

3.6 m² 3.2 m² 2.22 m²

1.9 m²

11.1 m²

7.2 m²

EF-M-02 Fläche: 7.5 x 4 m HNF: 107 m2 Anzahl: 4

EF-M-01 Fläche: 10 x 4 m HNF: 107,9 m2 Anzahl: 11

3.6 m² 11.1 m²

1.9 m² 11.3 m²

EF-S-03 Fläche: 7.5 x 4 m HNF: 80.5 m2 Anzahl: 2

3.6 m² 3.2 m²

3.6 m²

10.7 m²

RG

8.6 m²

23.4 m²

3.6 m²

1.6

41.9 m²

12.9 m²

3.3

7.7 m²

1.7

41.9 m²

EG

m 3.6 . m²

11.5 m²

W 03

7.7 m²

12.9 m²

1.6

W 03

7.9 m² 11.3 m²

EF-L-01 Fläche: 8.5 x 4 m HNF: 121,3 m2 Anzahl: 7

EF-L-04 Fläche: 14 x 6 m HNF: 171.7 m2 Anzahl: 1

19.7 m² 7.7 m² 33.66 m²²

11.6 m² 11.6 m² 3.6 m² 5.1 m²

3.7 m²

33.66 m²²

5.6 m²

1.9 m²

33.66 m²²

7.9 m²

3.1 m²

33.66 m²² 1.9 m²

17.9 m²

9.8 m²

19.7 m²

3.6 m² 3.2 m²

19.7

3.6 m²

5.1 m²

8.6 m²

55.2 m²

5.1 m²

3.9 m²

1.9 m² 5.8 m² 5.5 m²

EF-L-03 Fläche: 12 x 4 m HNF: 113,9 m2 Anzahl: 3

21.1 m²

13.1 m²

1.9 m² 14.6 m²

EF-L-02-P Fläche: 6.5 x 5 m HNF: 114.8 m2 Anzahl: 2

3.9 m²

6.1 m²

7.3 m²

15.5 m²

1.7 m²

12.4 m² 21.0 m²

Each house or apartment will have its own façade colour, emphasizing its individual ownership and individual floor plans defined by the redidents.

Ring aus Mehrfamilienhäusern

Ring aus Einfamilienhäusern mit doppelseitiger Orientierung

Optimierung der Ecksituationen mit Panorama Etagenwohungen

Differenzierung des Rings bzgl. gefragter Grössenstaffelung der Wohneinheiten

Aufbrechen des Blocks zur Adressbildung für Wohnraum im grünen Innenhof

Auffüllen des Innenraums mit individuellen kleinen Einfamilienhäusern

Privat- oder Gemeinschaftsgärten für alle Wohneinheiten

Halböffentliche Begegnungszone

02 ∙ storyline

2.9 m²

14.0 m²

21.3 m²

3.9

A cohesive landscaping plan foresees a wide variety of fruit trees in the courtyard, in both the private and public areas. The landscaping will attempt to blur the lines between the interior and exterior of the block into a widely applied park-like format.

Parking for the block is underground to create a car free interior, and the roofs of the buildings will be used for additional outdoor space.

W 03

m²² 1.66 m

5.4 m²

EG

The interior of the block is divided into both private and public spaces, with dividing walls used to hang tables or benches and parts of the walls which can be used for table tennis.

12.2 m²

1.9 m²

5.7 m²

26.2 m²

9.2 m²

MF-01 10 Einheiten HNF: 669 m2

MF-03 12 Einheiten HNF: 666.5 m2

8.1 m²

4.9 m²

12.2 m²

7.3 m²

2.2 m²

„The Urban Hybrid“. The exterior of the block is a varied urban street front whilst the interior offers the quality of a green and intimate village.

W 02

W 01 10.8 m²

8.1 m²

4.9 m² 1.9 m²

5.7 m² 6.4 m²

m 3.66 m² 3.6

1.7

— Focus: ground floor plans, as well as elevation and facade sections. The project was fully drawn as a team project in Autodesk Revit.

01 ∙ different housing types

1.8

Typology: Single and multifamily houses Program: Housing Scale: 9.000m2 [97 units of 16 types] Location: Emmen, Switzerland Team: Winy Maas, Frans de Witte, Maria Lopez, Jonathan Schuster, Angelika Hinterbrandner [mvrdv]

9.4 m²

8 03 ∙ top view

17,90

4400

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

870

4. OBERGESCHOSS

11,60

3. OBERGESCHOSS

8,55

2. OBERGESCHOSS

5,70

1. OBERGESCHOSS

2,85

Oberkante Dach +14.51m

2905

12,63

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

Oberkante Dach +11.46m

4tes OG +11.60m

3050

13,50

DACHAUFSICHT

1030

Oberkante Dach +14.51m max. Fassadenhöhe

1030

Oberkante Attika +9.58m

2850

2100

750

3tes OG +8.55m

2850

2100

750

2tes OG +5.70m

750

1tes OG +2.85m

Alfred-Schindler-Weg

Innenhof 0.00m

EG +0.00m

2360 2360

3560

Durchfahrtshöhe +2.36m

200550 450 1200

2850

2100

Oberkante Gartenmauer 1.60m

0. ERDGESCHOSS 0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN

-4,20

GW Mitte

-5,60

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

17,90

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

17,90

Einstellhalle -3.56m

UG -3.56m

640

-3,56

GW Hoch

1400

UNTERGESCHOSS

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 16

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 19

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 20

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 21

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 22

EFH - 4 - 9720 Haus 23

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 24

EFH - 4 - 6785 P Haus 25

MFH

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 26

4400

ANSICHT 5

870

-4,20

GW Mitte

-5,60

4400

2905 870 2100 3050

2. OBERGESCHOSS

750

5,70

Oberkante Attika +3.88m

2100 2850 2tes OG +5.70m

Oberkante Gartenmauer 1.60m

2,85

1tes OG +2.85m Durchfahrtshöhe +2.36m

UG -3.56m

EG +0.00m

Einfahrt Einstellhalle +0.00m

EG +0.00m

Einstellhalle -3.56m Rosenaustrasse

1. OBERGESCHOSS

2360 2360

Untersicht Einfahrt +2.30m

2300 Parkpromenade

450

Innenhof 0.00m

EG +0.00m Einfahrt Einstellhalle

200550 1200

Feldbreitenweg

1tes OG +2.85m

640

1000

Untersicht Einfahrt +2.51m

0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN 0. ERDGESCHOSS

3560

MFH - 1

EFH - 3 - 8300-P Haus 27

UG -3.56m

MFH - 2

ANSICHT 1

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 04

EFH - 3 - 9570 Haus 37

EFH - 4 - 9720 Haus 03

EFH - 2 - 11020 Haus 36

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 02

EFH - 3 - 11020 Haus 35

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 01

UG -3.56m

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 34

-3,56

EFH - 2 - 8300-P UNTERGESCHOSS Haus 33

-4,20

GW Hoch

-5,60

GW Mitte

E

MFH - 1

17,90

4400

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

1030 950

750 2850

950 -3,56

GW Hoch

3. OBERGESCHOSS

1400

-5,60

UNTERGESCHOSS

8,55

750 0

2tes OG +5.70m

3560

ANSICHT 6

4. OBERGESCHOSS Oberkante Attika +6.73m

2100 2850

3050 1100

2100 750

1000 750

2850

2850 1100

550

1000 2850 1100

750

2,85

-3,56 UNTERGESCHOSS 0. ERDGESCHOSS 0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN -4,20 GW Hoch

GW Mitte

1tes OG +2.85m

1000

0. ERDGESCHOSS 0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN

1. OBERGESCHOSS

max. Fassadenhöhe DACHAUFSICHT Oberkante Dach +8.60m

11,60

3tes OG +8.55m

3tes OG +8.55m

2850 1100

750

5,70

4tes OG +11.60m

Oberkante Attika +9.58m

2tes OG +5.70m

2850

2. OBERGESCHOSS

2,85

Oberkante Attika +12.63m Oberkante Dach +11.46m

2100

8,55

3tes OG +8.55m

4tes OG +11.60m

2290

1. OBERGESCHOSS

13,50 12,63

Oberkante Attika +9.58m

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

3560

3. OBERGESCHOSS

Oberkante Dach +14.51m

2850 2850

1030 1030

5,70

2. OBERGESCHOSS

3050

870

11,60

1875

DACHAUFSICHT 3. OBERGESCHOSS 4. OBERGESCHOSS

Oberkante Dach +11.46m

4tes OG +11.60m

Oberkante Dach +14.51m

2100

13,50 12,63 8,55

2905

11,60

max. Fassadenhöhe

Ob

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

950

4. OBERGESCHOSS

17,90

1030

12,63

1025

13,50

DACHAUFSICHT

4400

max. Fassadenhöhe

870

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

4. OBERGESCHOSS

11,60

4tes OG +11.60m

2905

12,63

Oberkante Dach +11.46m

3050 1100

950

13,50

DACHAUFSICHT

1030 1030

Oberkante Dach +14.51m max. Fassadenhöhe

2. OBERGESCHOSS

5,70

1. OBERGESCHOSS

2,85

1000

8,55

3tes OG +8.55m

2850 2100

750

3. OBERGESCHOSS

Oberkante Attika +9.58m

Oberkante Attika +6.73m

1000

1450

2850 1100

750

750

2tes OG +5.70m

650

1tes OG +2.85m

Oberkante Gartenmauer 1.60m

2850 2850 0. ERDGESCHOSS 0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN

EG +0.00m

3560

Alfred-Schindler-Weg

ANSICHT 2

UNTERGESCHOSS

-3,56

GW Hoch

-4,20

GW Mitte

-5,60

UG -3.56m

MFH - 3

01 ∙ sections ∙ elevation 02 ∙ facade section

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 12

EFH - 4 - 6785 Haus 11

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 10

EFH - 4 - 9720 Haus 09

EFH - 2 - 22200 Haus 08

EFH - 3 - 9720 Haus 07

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 06

EFH - 4 - 6785 Haus 05

02 ∙ 01 ∙

DA II- Dachaufbau: Entwässerung und Notüberläufe nach Vorgabe Fachplaner

14,67 m

40mm 180-200mm 120mm 60mm 10mm 420mm

Gefälle 1,5% 240

PU Anstich auf vorbereitetem Untergrund nach Farbkonzept MVRDV Gefälledämmung Swisspor Beton (Ortbeton) Beton (Fertigteil) Putz

560 180

14,44 m

2045

140

14,26 m

3075

Blechabdeckung, ebl nach Farbkonzept MVRDV Holz Unterkonstruktion für Blechabdeckung

2515 2515

Aussenputz Wärmedämmung EPS 200mm

12,63 m

Brüstung betoniert 200mm

DA I - 4. OG Bodenaufbau: Entwässerung und Notüberläufe nach Vorgabe Fachplaner

Dampfsperre

PU Anstich auf vorbereitetem Untergrund nach Farbkonzept MVRDV Splitt Vlies, Dachhaut, Polymerbitumenbahn EPS+EG V3 Gefälledämmung Swisspor Trittschal, Isover PS 81 Bitumenbahn VA 4 Beton (Ortbeton) Beton (Fertigteil) Gefälle 1,5% Innenputz

11,63 m

Montagewinkel für Store thermisch getrennt

11,32 m

Verbundraffstore, 90mm nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

11,14 m

Sturzelement EPS Swisspor

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

8,55

3. OBERGESCHOSS

5

Holzmetallfenster mit gedämmter Rahmenverbreiterung Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

750

2. OBERGESCHOSS

2,85

1. OBERGESCHOSS

1777

2850

2100

750

5,70

Blechabdeckung Erkerfenster mit Unterkonstruktion thermisch getrennt 8,55 m

Dampfbremse

550

1tes OG +2.85m

2850

Untersicht Einfahrt +2.51m

2290

Fussbodenbelag Unterlagsboden inkl. Fussbodenheizung Trittschaldämmung Wärmedämmung Beton (Ortbeton) Beton (Fertigteil) Innenputz

Aussenputz Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

2850

2100

6

2tes OG +5.70m

2500

FB II - 3. OG Bodenaufbau:

Montagewinkel für Metallfensterbank thermisch getrennt

0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN 0. ERDGESCHOSS

8,40 m

Verbundraffstore, 90mm nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

8,22 m

1400

640

UG -3.56m

-3,56

UNTERGESCHOSS

-4,20

GW Hoch

-5,60

GW Mitte

17,90

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

2850

3560

Feldbreitenweg

Montagewinkel für Store thermisch getrennt

20mm 80mm 20mm 30mm 120mm 60mm 10mm 340mm 340 10 180 150

3050

2100

Metallfensterbank, ebl Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

3tes OG +8.55m

Einfahrt Einstellhalle EG +0.00m

3050

4. OBERGESCHOSS

2575 2575

max. Fassadenhöhe DACHAUFSICHT

11,60

1062

13,50 12,63

950

4tes OG +11.60m

870 1025

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

1030

4400

17,90

475

Blechhochzug mit PU Anstrich auf vorbereitetem Untergrund Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

40mm 40mm 10mm 150-190mm 10mm 5mm 120mm 60mm 10mm 475mm

10 180

1988

Dichtschlämme

285

Wärmedämmung EPS 110mm

2241

2510 2510

H-1

FB II - 2. OG Bodenaufbau: Dampfbremse 12714

max. Fassadenhöhe

870

12,63

DACHAUFSICHT

11,60

4. OBERGESCHOSS

Phase:

BAUPROJEKT

ANSICHT 5-6

3050 1030

1

8,55

3. OBERGESCHOSS

5,55 m Montagewinkel für Store thermisch getrennt

FEEM 31.3

Wohnüberbauung Feldbreite, Baufeld C1, 6032 Emmen LU

750

3tes OG +8.55m

5,70 m

Titel:

2

Standort:

Grundeigentümer:

Maßstab:

682

13,50

1030

4tes OG +11.60m

1 : 100

Alfred Schindler-Fonds, c/o Schindler Management AG, Zugerstrasse 13, 6030 Ebikon

2100 2850

Holzmetallfenster mit gedämmter Rahmenverbreiterung Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

Gesuchsteller / Bauherr: 5,70

Senn Resources AG, Davidstrasse 38, 9001 St. Gallen

Baueingabe vom:

28/07/2014

750

2. OBERGESCHOSS

5,37 m

Verbundraffstore, 90mm nach Farbkonzept MVRDV Sturzelement EPS Swisspor

Format:

1399/594

2tes OG +5.70m

20mm 80mm 20mm 30mm 120mm 60mm 10mm 340mm 340 10 180 150

4400

Montageelement Loggia thermisch getrennnt

berkante Dach +14.51m

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

Fussbodenbelag Unterlagsboden inkl. Fussbodenheizung Trittschaldämmung Wärmedämmung Beton (Ortbeton) Beton (Fertigteil) Innenputz

Holzmetallfenster mit gedämmter Rahmenverbreiterung Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

750

1. OBERGESCHOSS

2850

2,85

1tes OG +2.85m

2000

2100 2850

VSG Glasbrüstung seitlich befestigt

0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN 0. ERDGESCHOSS

FB II - 1. OG Bodenaufbau: Metallfensterbank, ebl Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

F -3,56

UNTERGESCHOSS

-4,20

GW Hoch

-5,60

GW Mitte

E D2

G B2

1400

C2

B1

Montagewinkel für Store thermisch getrennt

D1

C1

EFH - 3 - 10270 Haus 16

2,85 m

20mm 80mm 20mm 30mm 120mm 60mm 10mm 340mm

2,70 m A3 A2

A1

±0.00 = 431.10 m.ü.M = OK fertig Boden Erdgeschoss

Verbundraffstore, 90mm nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

PP 83043394 = 430.76 m.ü.M = -0.34 m PP 83040615 = 431.12 m.ü.M = +0.02 m 0

17,90

Fussbodenbelag Unterlagsboden inkl. Fussbodenheizung Trittschaldämmung Wärmedämmung Beton (Ortbeton) Beton (Fertigteil) Innenputz

2

4

6

8

850

640

UG -3.56m

Montagewinkel für Metallfensterbank thermisch getrennt

340 10 180 150

Alfred-Schindler-Weg

3560

EG +0.00m

2510 2510

2100 2850

Projektverfasser/ Architekten:

MVRDV bv Rotterdam_GKS Luzern, c/o GKS Architekten+Partner AG, Winkelriedstrasse 56, 6003 Luzern

2,52 m Sturzelement EPS Swisspor

10

max. Höhe Dachaufbau

2510 2510

4400

2850

Holzmetallfenster mit gedämmter Rahmenverbreiterung Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

DACHAUFSICHT

11,60

4. OBERGESCHOSS

1100 3050

3. OBERGESCHOSS

5,70

2. OBERGESCHOSS

2,85

1. OBERGESCHOSS

Grundeigentümer:

Maßstab:

1 : 100

Alfred Schindler-Fonds, c/o Schindler Management AG, Zugerstrasse 13, 6030 Ebikon

Format:

Gefälle 2,0%

2100 2850

1399/594

0,00 m

Senn Resources AG, Davidstrasse 38, 9001 St. Gallen

Baueingabe vom:

450 330

28/07/2014 -0,45 m

Projektverfasser/ Architekten:

350 350

MVRDV bv Rotterdam_GKS Luzern, c/o GKS Architekten+Partner AG, Winkelriedstrasse 56, 6003 Luzern

2850 2850

Abdichtung

EG +0.00m

Noppenbahn 0,00 = 431,1 ü.NN 0. ERDGESCHOSS

Feldbreitenweg

20mm 80mm 20mm 330mm 350mm 800mm

Gesuchsteller / Bauherr:

1100 2850 1000

1tes OG +2.85m

FB I - Erdgeschoss Bodenaufbau: Fussbodenbelag Unterlagsboden inkl. Fussbodenheizung Trittschaldämmung Wärmedämmung Beton

Aufbau Konzept Fontana

750 0

2tes OG +5.70m

Metallfensterbank, ebl Nach Farbkonzept MVRDV

FEEM 31.1

Wohnüberbauung Feldbreite, Baufeld C1, 6032 Emmen LU 8,55

Montagewinkel für Metallfensterbank thermisch getrennt

Titel:

ANSICHT 1-2

Standort:

1750

3tes OG +8.55m

Phase:

BAUPROJEKT

120

870

4tes OG +11.60m

950

2905

Oberkante Attika +12.63m

2114

max. Fassadenhöhe

12,63

1875

13,50

1030 1030

Oberkante Dach +14.51m

-0,80 m Kellerraum Phase:

BAUPRO

-1,20 m UK Unterzug

E D2

Standort:

Wohnüberbauun

G B2

C2

MFH - 2

3560

GW Hoch

-5,60

Grundeigentümer:

B1

GW Mitte

C1

D1 A3 A1

A2

2760 2760

UNTERGESCHOSS

-4,20

±0.00 = 431.10 m.ü.M = OK fertig Boden Erdgeschoss PP 83043394 = 430.76 m.ü.M = -0.34 m PP 83040615 = 431.12 m.ü.M = +0.02 m 0

2

4

6

8

Alfred Schindler Zugerstrasse 13,

Gesuchsteller / Bauher

Senn Resources

10

Projektverfasser/ Arch

MVRDV bv Rotter c/o GKS Architek 6003 Luzern

BP I - Untergeschoss Bodenafbau:

-3,56 m

Fussbodenbelag Beton Sauberkeitsschicht aus Magerbeton -3,58 m

20mm 350mm 50mm 420mm 20 20

-3,56

420 350 350

UG -3.56m

-3,93 m

50 50

3560

F

E

C

FASSADENSCHNITT EFH-4-9720

N

01 ∙ ground floor plan

tha n k

y o u

find more info about my work online ∙ ahinterbrandner.com for any further questions feel free to send me an email ∙ angelika@ahinterbrandnaer.com november 2o16 Š made with love