Archiprint 8 - The Ideal Profession

Page 36

36

What happens to architecture graduates

It might therefore be tempting to think

To understand this inevitable idealism and

after years of dedicated study?

In his

that the university should be adapted to fit

how it is related to academic education,

article I Will Learn You Architecture! in

the requirements of the field. Although De

we will first zoom out to a discussion on

Volume, Reinier de Graaf describes the gap

Graaf continues by saying he did not want

universities in general. As it becomes more

1

between academic education and practice.

his education to be any different, he would

important for universities to show their

A ‘complete shock’ is what he calls the

have wanted it to be ‘candid about the status

economic value as well, different voices have

transition from his academic education

of what was being taught [and] that some

come up to emphasize what the university

to his first day in the office. He felt both

notion of context would have been provided.’

actually is for.5 In his book If You’re So

over- and under-qualified, as ‘technical

He continues: ‘I would have developed more

Smart, Why Aren’t You Rich?, Chris Lorenz

knowledge fell way short of what it needed

entrepreneurial and fewer artistic interests . .

observes the economization of Dutch higher

to be... and nobody was interested in the

. and I would have recognized Le Corbusier

education and research, thoroughly ruining

elevated philosophical considerations I

and Mies for what they actually are:

the autonomy of universities and their

had developed during my studies’, thereby

history.’ Dismissing these idealistic aspects

ability to select students and staff according

underlining the frequently mentioned

of architectural education, De Graaf seems to

to their own criteria.6 Market processes are

statement that there is a difference between

draw a rather plain conclusion. Remarkably

now hindering the actual goal of Dutch

what students have learned during their

enough he contradicts himself in the very

universities:

time at university, and what they need to

next paragraph, stating that ‘productive

scientific education and research.

know when working in practice.

idealism’ is something architects inevitably

2

4

need.

to

provide

autonomous

Stefan Collini, a professor at Cambridge

Confronted with a sheer lack of interest in

University who has long been studying

his ideas, De Graaf acknowledges the ‘utter

the developments of universities, also

uselessness’ of the architect and the need to

observes

obey the requirements of economic interests. This powerlessness made some of his fellow students decide to start their career by teaching at university. To De Graaf, however, this is a strange recycling of experience. He wonders ‘what somebody barely having had a taste of the real world could possibly have to teach, apart from what they themselves had been taught a few years prior’. In that 3

sense, an ‘educational bubble’ is created, avoiding the tough reality of the capitalist world after graduation.

Confronted with a sheer lack of interest in his ideas, De Graaf acknowledges the ‘utter uselessness’ of the architect and the need to obey the requirements of economic interests.

this

increasing

importance

of universities to show their economic contribution.7 According to him, one of the most important aspects of a university is that ‘it offers postsecondary education, where “education” means more than only professional training’.8 Economic value is becoming the decisive factor in what will be topics for research. For some disciplines this means academic education is becoming less autonomous and more dependent on economic interests, while others, especially humanities, are even jeopardized in their


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook