Zubair "Ali: Zai was a Takfi:ri: minded person who was ready to declare any one either as Kafir or as Heretic. He was so stunch that he began to oppose Imam Ibn Taimiah RH: and 'Ima:m Sha:h 'Isma:"i:l Shahi:d RD: . He was an opponent of belief of Possibility of Falsehood in Divine Declarative Assertive and Negative Sentences. He used the objections of 'Ah:mad Rad:a: of Bans Baraili [1856-1930] I personally did write to him that Imam Shah 'Isma"i:l Shahi:d RD: did claimed the Possibility of Falsehood in Divine Sentences stated above, BUT he did not claimed the Possibility Of Other Defects [ Defective Atrributes and Defective Acts] like EATING. DRINKING, THURST, HUNGER , WALKING , PAIN BODINESS ETC. But he was unable to distinguish between the two types of Defects. He was opponent of Shah Shahi:d for three reasons. 1] Vah:datul Vuju:d. 2] 'ASH"ARIAH and Maturiah 3] Some sentences of Tqviatul 'i:ma:n As for Vah:datul Vuju:d Shah 'isma:"il has a different interpretation of the dogma , and his interpretation cannot be declared as Kufr.But Ali Zai was unable to declare ALLAMAH ROPAR:I as kafir when he defended the very same dogma in Fatava Ahlul Hadith. My objection is that If Allamah Ropar:i can be apologized, then what stoped Ali Zai from making Apologies for Shah 'Isa:"i:l Shadi:d and rest of 'Ahlussunnah Deoband. As for Ash"ariah and Maturidiah , a large number of great Sunni Scholars are either "Ash"ari or Maturidi or both. From Ibn Hajr to Mulla Ali Qari, one can not declare each and every Scholar as heretic just because of their Ash"arism and Maturism. My objection is then why Shah 'Isma:"i:l is to be accused. At best one may differ but to declare them , out of folds of Ahlusunnah is the pure Extremism. As for Taqviatul Ima:n he commited a gross error. Actually Ali Zai was making objection on the portions of texts of books of Ahlussunnah Deoband, which he borrowed from Ahmad Rad:a of Bans Baraili, he was informed that such incorrect objections can even be rased against Taqviatul Iman Shari:f, hoping that he may stop attacking those books , since inpite of all disputes which are between Ahlul H:adi:th and Ahlussunnah Deoband , no true Ahlul Hadith: accepts the objection of Rad:a of Bans Baraili against the elders of Ahlussunnah Deoband.