A snapshot of what you need to know
TRIAL PITTING; CONTROLLING THE RISKS
A preview of the upcoming two-hour AGS webinar focusing on trial pitting.
NEURODIVERSITY AND DISABILITY
Embracing difference in the geotechnical and geoenvironmental sectors
BRIDGING THE KNOWLEDGE GAP
Mark Hill from The Pensions Regulator discusses climate change and sustainability
Welcome to this edition of AGS magazine, a celebration of people, knowledge sharing, and innovations shaping the future of geoenvironmental sciences.
As our industry evolves, so too must our focus. Today, technical excellence goes together with human insight. We must champion neurodiversity in our teams, recognising that diverse ways of thinking lead to richer problem-solving and more resilient outcomes (see “Embracing difference”). The creation of inclusive environments where every voice is valued is not just good practice—it is essential for progress.
Climate change continues to challenge our assumptions and redefine our responsibilities. From shifting ground conditions to the need for low-carbon solutions, geoenvironmental scientists are at the forefront of climate adaptation. Our work must now anticipate long-term environmental change and contribute meaningfully to sustainability goals. SiLC introduces its Climate Change and Sustainability Subgroup while we celebrate the launch of the new AGS Sustainability Charter.
Legislation is also moving rapidly, with new standards around environmental impact,
safety, and risk management. Staying informed and proactive is key to ensuring compliance and protecting both communities and clients. Updates are shared on Coal Authority Permitting, the risk of using unlicensed water standpipes and the Building Safety Act 2022, what you need to know.
This issue brings together thought leadership, technical insights, and stories that reflect the heart of our profession— our people. We hope it inspires you to think boldly, collaborate widely, and continue building a future that is grounded in science, empathy, and purpose.
We are always on the lookout for additional, informative content for the magazine, so if you have an opinion piece, a case study, a technical article or a wider issue that you think the geotechnical and geoenvironmental public would find beneficial, please do get in touch.
We would be interested in your feedback on the magazine and our future plans. Please contact ags@ags.org.uk if you have any comments.
The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) is a not-for-profit trade association established to improve the profile and quality of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. The membership comprises UK organisations and individuals having a common interest in the business of ground investigation, geotechnics, geoenvironmental engineering, engineering geology, geochemistry, hydrogeology, and other related disciplines.
Alex Lee, AGS Chair
Caroline Kratz, Forum Court Associates (FCA)
Katie Kennedy, FCA
Julian Lovell, Equipe Group
Calum Spires, Equipe Group
Adam Latimer, Ian Farmer Associates
Dimitris Xirouchakis, Structural Soils
EDITORIAL STORY
To submit an article for inclusion in the AGS Magazine, please contact the AGS on 020 8658 8212 or ags@ags.org.uk. Please note that articles should act as opinion pieces and not directly advertise a company. The AGS is under no obligation to feature articles or events received.
CONTACT US
Association of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Specialists Forum Court, The Alexander Centre, 15-17 Preston Street, Faversham, Kent, ME13 8NZ
ags@ags.org.uk
020 8658 8212
Association of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Specialists
www.ags.org.uk
Alex Lee AGS Chair
FEATURE
PAGE 18
COVER STORY
PAGE 26
Kathryn Eva and Charlie Bayliss from Beale & Co take a look at The Building Safety Act 2022.
Neurodiversity and disability in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering sector - Embracing difference
Martin Griffin, a multi-awarded EDI Champion and UK-based Principal Geotechnical Engineer with the international multidisciplinary consultancy GHD, discusses the power of neurodiversity.
THANK YOU TO VIVIEN DENT
PAGE 4
Alex Lee, new Chair of the AGS offer his thanks for immediate past-Chair Vivient Dent.
TRIAL PITTING; CONTROLLING THE RISKS
PAGE 14
A preview of the upcoming two-hour AGS webinar focusing on trial pitting chaired by Elizabeth Withington.
BRIDGING THE KNOWLEDGE GAP – CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABILITY
PAGE 38
Contributed by Mark Hill from The Pensions Regulator
MORE INSIDE
PAGE 5
News in Short: Incl. Publication Updates
PAGE 34
Q&A with Luqman Ismail Winner - AGS Poster Comp
PAGE 40
Standards Update August 2025
Dear Viv,
I am writing to express our deepest appreciation for your exceptional service to the AGS. Throughout your tenure as Chair, you have demonstrated outstanding leadership and professionalism, and your hard work and dedication have been instrumental in many of our recent successes.
"Serve to lead" is a leadership philosophy that emphasizes the importance of serving others as the foundation of effective leadership. It focuses on prioritizing the needs and wellbeing of the team, fostering a supportive and collaborative environment. Leaders who adopt this approach actively listen, show empathy, and empower their team members to reach their full potential. By putting service before authority, they inspire trust, loyalty, and high performance. This philosophy underscores that true leadership is not about wielding power, but about guiding and uplifting others to achieve collective success. You have delivered against all of the above.
Your leadership skills have been a beacon of inspiration. You have consistently guided and motivated the team, fostered a culture of collaboration and excellence. Your openness and willingness to listen to diverse perspectives has created an environment where everyone feels valued and heard. You have strengthened our organisation and empowered individuals to contribute their best.
Over the past year, AGS has launched several initiatives related to Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI), sustainability, and developing
young talent at the beginning of their careers. Through your direct involvement, the AGS has also been able to establish closer links with the Geoprofessional Business Association, extending our engagement, collaboration, and influence to North America. This has opened new avenues for growth and development, and we are grateful for your vision and efforts in making this possible.
Your directions on strategy, active participation in leading the Executive Committee meetings and contributing to the Business Practice and Sustainability Working groups has been invaluable. Under your guidance, the AGS has generated a surplus, leading to the creation of the ‘AGS Development Fund’. This fund has already made significant contributions, including the AGS video, revision of the Blue Book (Effective Site Investigation), AGS soakaway project, and enabling participation in international conferences and meetings. The Development Fund will continue to benefit all AGS member organizations in the future, and we owe much of its success to your leadership.
As I take over as Chair, I hope my own time in this role will be as successful as yours. Your legacy of excellence, inclusivity, and sustainability will continue to inspire us as we move forward. On behalf of all of us at AGS, I would like to extend our heartfelt thanks for your contributions. Your impact on our organization and industry has been profound, and we are grateful for the positive changes you have brought about.
Thank you, Viv, for your dedication, passion, and exemplary leadership. We wish you all the best in your future endeavours and look forward to continuing to work with you as outgoing chair.
Dr Alexander Lee Chair of the AGS
The top three downloaded AGS publications in last month:
1. AGS Client Guide for Ground Investigation Activities – Trial Pitting
2. AGS Guidance on Waste Classification for Soils – A Practitioners Guide
3. AGS Guide to Ground Investigation Reports
To download the publications for free; click here
The AGS Geotechnical Working Group are in the process of reviewing the current practice of using BRE365 soakage testing for infiltration SuDS design. This is in response to safety concerns with respect to working near water raised by the HSE, as well as concerns raised by members on the reliability of test results used for design, the specification of testing in low permeability/impermeable soils, and the sustainable use of resources.
As part of the review, the AGS have secured funding undertake preliminary in-situ permeameter testing within window sampled trial holes alongside proposed BRE365 soakage tests. This will enable an initial comparison between two test methods. The AGS are therefore looking for suitable sites on which to undertake this trial.
To make the best use of the funding, the AGS are looking to undertake the trial in conjunction with an existing ground investigation. There are some prerequisites to identifying a suitable site. It will require:
Î Suitable ground conditions including:
› Ideally natural granular strata for the full
depth of test ≈3m depth.
› Groundwater level below the base of the testing zone
Î No features that could influence the insitu test results in the vicinity of the test locations, such as deep made ground, drainage runs, existing SuDs, uneven topography etc
Î Engineer logged trial pits with BRE365 soakage tests, ≈3m depth, already specified for the site by others
Î Service clearance for the proposed AGS trial hole locations
Î The clients permission for the AGS to undertake additional windowless sampling and soakage testing within the WS trial holes on site. Ideally this should be undertaken in conjunction with the full scale testing.
Î The clients permission for the AGS to have access to the ground investigation report, in-situ and laboratory test results for the site.
Î The clients permission for the AGS to publish the infiltration test results and findings in an academic paper and the AGS magazine.
If you have a potential site and/or dataset and are interested in getting involved, please get in contact with the AGS Innovation Fund BRE365 at ags@ags.org.uk
Article contributed by Peter Plumpton (Ground Investigation Estimator, SOCOTEC)
Following Stakeholder Engagements held by The Coal Authority (since renamed as the Mining Remediation Authority) in October 2023 and March 2024, the Authority has updated its Permit Terms and Conditions in order to address concerns relating to the required unlimited indemnity. Recognising changes within the market relating to their previous position of requesting unlimited indemnities, the Authority has now updated their Permit Terms and Conditions to introduce the following:
Definitions for Designer and Contractor have been included to match the definitions as provided within the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. Definitions of Client and Agent are also included. These allow the Client to appoint an Agent who may then represent the Client in discussions with the Authority and also enter into binding agreements on behalf of the Client.
The following significant amendments have been made:
Î Clause 1 has been amended to cap
indemnity at £10 million. The wording has also been revised to limit the extent of the indemnity to ensure that any claims made are ‘reasonable’ thereby excluding costs for damages that are not related to Permit Holder’s actions or that of its contractors and Agents.
Î Clause 6 has been amended to clarify that insurance must be ‘sufficient’.
Î Clause 12 amended to require permit certificates to be kept on site to try to ensure permit compliance.
Other minor amendments have been made to conditions 3,4,5,7 and 13 to align the conditions to definitions in Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and in line with the amendments outlined above.
The updated guidance explains the changes they have made in more detail. In summary, indemnity is now capped at £10million and the Authority do not require insurance to be £10million for small-scale operations. Insurance is required only to be adequate to provide the Permit holder with sufficient funds to furnish any likely claim on the indemnity by the Authority.
The updated permit terms and conditions are now published at: https://www.gov.uk/ government/publications/coal-miningpermit-terms-and-conditions-applicationform/permit-terms-and-conditions
The updated guidance is now published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/permit-process/permit-process
Article contributed by Neil Griffiths (Commercial Manager, Geotechnics) and Peter Plumpton (Ground Investigation Estimator, SOCOTEC)
It is a criminal offence under section 174(3) of the Water Industry Act 1991 to connect unauthorised equipment to the water network to ensure the integrity of the water supply and for the protection of public health. Authorised licensed standpipes are available in some cases through authorised third-party providers (e.g., Aquam), or directly from the relevant Water Company for the area.
Authorised and licensed standpipes are designed to meet industry standards, and include Double Check Valves (DCV) to prevent the backflow of dirty water into the network, and meters to accurately measure water usage. These features ensure that water is delivered safely and efficiently, reducing the risk of damage to the network and ensuring compliance with the regulations.
The legal consequence of using an unauthorised standpipe is prosecution, which can result in significant fines and legal costs. Drains Limited were prosecuted for three offences for unauthorised use of standpipes, and fines totalling £4,500 together with legal costs of £4,656 issued.
The risks of connecting unauthorised equipment to the water network include:
1. Contamination: Unauthorised equipment may not meet the necessary storage or safety standards, leading to the potential contamination of the clean water supply.
2. Backflow Risk: Approved standpipes include double check valves to prevent dirty water
from entering the network, a critical safety measure that unauthorised connections lack.
3. Pressure and Supply Issues: Improper installation can cause pressure fluctuations or disruptions for other users.
4. Leakage: Unauthorised use is classified as leakage, which water companies are required to monitor and report to Ofwat. Failure to address this can result in fines.
5. Health and Safety: High-pressure mains can pose serious risks of injury if equipment is not properly installed or maintained.
6. Asset Damage: Unauthorised connections can damage Water Companies infrastructure.
Whilst it is frequently subcontractors that are being employed to undertake investigation works that are utilising standpipes, the use of unauthorised equipment presents the additional risk of reputational damage to the main contractor. It would be prudent to confirm at the outset of any investigation that all subcontractors are using authorised connections and have the correct training/ certification (CALM Networks). Further, Contractual clauses could be utilised to reinforce the requirement for licenced apparatus and trained operatives.
References: https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/specialfeatures/ses-water-successfully-prosecuteslanes-21635036
https://www.aquamcorp.co.uk/
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ukpga/1991/56/
https://www.aquamcorp.co.uk/calmnetworks-training
We’re pleased to announce that our flagship event, the Annual Conference will return to One Great George Street in London’s Westminster on Thursday 19th March 2026.
Chaired by Alex Lee (AGS Chair and Partner at HKA), this full day, CPD event will feature a series of expert speakers from across the geotechnical and geoenvironmental sector, with their presentations themed on the topic, challenges in geosciences. The event will conclude with a networking drinks and canapé reception in the Great Hall.
This event is currently sponsored by Soil Engineering, Brimstone, Groundsure, BAM Ritchies, In Situ Site Investigation, Geosense, Van Walt, i2 Analytical, Eijkelkamp Fraste UK, AFITEXINOV UK and SOCOTEC.
Further information on the event including speaker presentations will be announced in due course.
AGS Member companies, Affiliate Members and Honorary Members are entitled to a limited number of complimentary tickets, as part of their membership subscription. Additional tickets for the Annual Conference are priced at £135 for AGS Members, and £210 for NonMembers.
For full ticket information including prices and how to register please click HERE
Sponsoring the AGS Annual Conference offers a unique opportunity to position your company at the heart of the UK’s geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering community. With a highly engaged audience of industry leaders, technical specialists, and decision-makers, the event provides unrivalled visibility, valuable networking, and meaningful alignment with the sector’s leading voices. Sponsorship not only supports knowledge-sharing and best practice but also demonstrates a clear commitment to advancing the industry.
We have sponsorship opportunities available for both Members and non-Members of the Association who wish to have a presence during the event. For full details of all available packages please click HERE
Your Environmental Data Co-Pilot
Scan me
• Free environmental data for site assessment
• Order full wealth of Groundsure reports
• Seamless experience in the office or onsite
• Access Groundsure Explorer - your gateway to Insight data online
Start your journey now at:
The AGS Data Conference will return to Birmingham this December and will provide delegates with the latest developments and advancements in the Electronic Transfer of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Data.
Chaired by Jackie Bland (Principal Ground Investigation Data Manager & AGS Data Management Working Group Leader), this fullday, CPD event will explore what’s working, what’s changing, and what’s next for AGS Data Format across three dynamic sessions.
Whether you're an engineering geologist, geotechnical engineer, geoenvironmental specialist or data scientist, this event will provide industry expert presentations from the AGS Data Management Working Group (DMWG) including an overview of the refinements to the AGS4 data dictionary, the release of AGS 4.2, AGSi, AGS Piling and an outline of the proposed AGS 5.
Hear about the progress made by the DMWG including successes, setbacks, and the restructuring of AGS data practices. In this session delegates can:
Î Hear insights from focus groups across key structural areas
Î Learn what’s working (and what’s not) from the experts shaping the standards
Î Be inspired to get involved – your input matters
Explore the near-future roadmap of AGS data. This session will include updates on:
Î AGS 4.2 including segments on CPT and Advanced Testing
Î AGSi: the evolving digital interface
Î AGS Piling: sector-specific progress and integration
Be part of shaping what comes next with the launch of AGS 5:
Î What AGS 5 aims to achieve
Î What's already underway, and what's still to be included
Î A look at international perspectives: collaboration and data exchange with Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and more
Î Packaging and preparing AGS data for realworld application
Whether you are looking to get involved in the next generation of the format or find out more about AGS Electronic Transfer of Data, this event can help future-proof your organisation. This event is sponsored by SoilCloud, SOCOTEC, Equipe Group, BAM Ritchies, Groundsure, Eijkelkamp Fraste UK and Seequent.
AGS member company tickets are priced at the reduced rate of £150. Non-members may attend the conference for £250. Prices exclude VAT.
To register and for further information please click HERE
Sponsoring the AGS Data Conference offers a unique opportunity to position your company at the forefront of innovation in a rapidly evolving field. It’s a unique opportunity to showcase your company's expertise, connect with industry leaders, and demonstrate your commitment to advancing data-driven solutions that improve safety, efficiency, and sustainability in ground engineering.
We have a range of sponsorship opportunities for companies wishing to have a visual and virtual presence during this highly targeted conference. For full details of our sponsorship packages please click on the below button.
SPONSOR* (AGS Member Rate: £1600 / Non-Member Rate: £2100)
Î Company logo featured on catering tables
Î Two/three page company/individual Q&A in AGS Magazine (over 7,550 subscribers)**
Î Full page advert in AGS Magazine (worth £400)**
Î Entry for three delegates into the conference
Î A designated area to exhibit company
initiatives, research and software during the conference. This exhibition space can also be used to showcase marketing materials, company literature, research and banners
*one package available **terms and conditions apply
SPONSOR (AGS Member Rate: £1350/ Non-Member Rate: £1755)
Î Full page advert in AGS Magazine (worth £400, over 7550 subscribers)**
Î A designated area to exhibit company initiatives, research and software during the conference. This exhibition space can also be used to showcase marketing materials, company literature, research and banners
Î Entry for three delegates into the conference
GOLD SPONSOR – (AGS Member Rate: £1200/ Non-Member Rate: £1560)
Î A designated area to exhibit company initiatives, research and software during the conference. This exhibition space can also be used to showcase marketing materials, company literature and banners
Î Entry for two delegates into the conference
Î 1/4-page advert in AGS Magazine (worth £160, over 7,550 subscribers)
All listed rates exclude VAT. Packages are offered on a first-come, first served basis. To confirm your interest or for further information email ags@ags.org.uk or click HERE.
SPONSORED BY
Sustainability – Practical Steps for AGS Members: AGS Sustainability Charter Launched and Webinar Replay Available
On Thursday 12th June 2025, the AGS held a webinar entitled, Sustainability – Practical Steps for AGS Members, to launch the AGS Sustainability Charter. The webinar was chaired by Alison Nicholson (Geoenvironmental Associate Director, Buro Happold) and featured presentations from Vivien Dent (Groundwater and Land Quality Technical Specialist, Environment Agency), Marla Gillow (Senior Geotechnical Engineer, Ramboll), Natalie Cropp (Sustainability Director, Tony Gee), Sam Setchell (Principal Engineering Geologist, Jackson Geo Services), Helen McMillan (Technical Director, RSK) and Sarah Cook (Director, Onyx Geo Consulting).
By signing up to the Charter, companies and teams are invited to commit to two achievable and relevant sustainability targets. This inclusive approach ensures that all AGS members, regardless of size or specialism, can play a meaningful role in advancing sustainability across the industry. These collective efforts will not only help reduce environmental impact but also position AGS
members as leaders in driving positive change.
The presentation from Vivien Dent and Marla Gillow provided an overview of the AGS Sustainability Routemap, including insights from the recent AGS Sustainability Survey and the key areas AGS members want the AGS to prioritise. Sam Setchell presented on how to sign up to the AGS Sustainability Charter and Natalie Cropp demonstrated a worked example on the approach and commitments Tony Gee has made in signing up to the Charter. Helen McMillan discussed current and upcoming sustainability guidance and how this can be applied to reduce risks posed by climate change. The final presentation by Sarah Cook gave insights on the comparative carbon emissions of different site investigation techniques and looked at how thorough site investigation and a good ground model can lead to substantially lower overall carbon emissions in the final design.
The webinar replay is free for AGS members and £50 + VAT for non-members. To view the replay and all presentation synopsises, please click here. To sign up for the AGS Sustainability Charter and for more information, please visit the AGS website.
Tailored geotechnical courses delivered on your schedule. Designed to keep your team sharp while minimizing downtime and expenses. Regular open courses delivered from our dedicated training facility, or bespoke courses delivered at your site or offices. Whenever, wherever - Equipe can fulfill your training needs.
Health and Safety Courses
Delivered in partnership with RPA Safety Services
IOSH Safe Supervision of Geotechnical Sites (3 Days)
Learn in detail how to keep yourself and your on-site operatives safe in the fieldthe geotechnical industry’s SSSTS equivalent
IOSH Avoiding Danger from Underground Services
In accordance with the requirements and guidance set out within HSG47
Safe Working on Geotechnical Sites
The ultimate one-day introduction to safety on geotechnical projects
Health and Safety Courses Delivered in
MARGI - Managing & working with Asbestos Risk in Ground Investigation
A comprehensive guidance to deal with asbestos in a ground engineering environment, including full adherence to
Geotechnical Courses
Prof. David Norbury’s Soil Description Workshop
Providing a detailed approach to soil description practices and techniques
Prof. David Norbury’s Rock Description Workshop
Providing a detailed approach to rock description practices and techniques
Prof. David Norbury’s Chalk Description Workshop
Providing a detailed approach to chalk description practices and techniques
Understanding & Scheduling Geotechnical Laboratory Tests
Detailed overview of processes involved in efficiently scheduling Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Mastering the AGS Data Format
Get to grips with common and complex data issues
Further Foundation Design Complex & deep pile foundations for geotechnical practitioners and engineers
Earthworks Design and Construction
A general overview of materials sourcing / selection for design & construction
Slope
Trial Pitting; Controlling the Risks, is a twohour webinar taking place between 11:00-13:00 on Wednesday 24th September.
Chaired by AGS Safety Working Group Leader, Elizabeth Withington, (CC Ground Investigations), this webinar will focus on the safety of trial pitting from the perspective of the Main Contractor, Designer and GI Contactor.
When entering “what is trial pitting” into an AI tool, we are given the definition, “trial pitting, also known as test pitting or trial trenching, is a ground investigation technique where holes or trenches are dug to assess subsurface conditions, soil profiles, and groundwater conditions, typically before construction or development begins”. So clearly, even for AI, trial pitting is very useful in the toolbox of available GI techniques. However, whilst acknowledged as an extremely useful and rapid technique for assessing ground conditions, the process is frequently coming under scrutiny
from a safety viewpoint, particularly when examined from the perspective of temporary works.
This webinar, which will include presentations from Will Capps (Lucion Delta-Simons), Marcus Boneham (AtkinsRéalis) and Jamie Graham (Aarsleff Ground Engineering), will discuss how “temporary works” is often applied to trial pitting, what legislation should be considered, and what reasonable safety applications should be used for the opening of short duration ground investigation trial pits. This event will explore if temporary works design really is applicable, what the designer should be specifying and are they considering time and resources, and how the GI contractor should safely comply with legislation and expectations.
This virtual event will feature three presentations, plus a panel discussion where
attendees will be encouraged to asked questions and discuss what alternatives there are out there.
Is Trial Pitting to be Considered as Definite Excavations?
Will Capps, Technical Manager at Lucion DeltaSimons
With trial pitting being one of the key methods to ascertain information on the ground. Will Capps believes that there aren’t other methods that can replicate trial pitting in a ground investigation and provide the same information.
This presentation aims to take a look into trial pitting from a ground investigation contractors point of view and will ask questions including; Is there suitable and relevant guidance available? What is this guidance? How does this apply to the geoenvironmental industry? What measures can we use to reduce risk in trial pitting? Which parties need to be considered?
Pitting: A Designer’s Perspective
Marcus Boneham, Associate Geotechnical Engineer at AtkinsRéalis
Trial pitting has a long-established role in ground investigation, offering geotechnical designers direct insight into ground conditions. Despite its simplicity, it presents safety
challenges that must be carefully managed. This presentation explores why designers continue to specify trial pits, how we assess their value against alternatives, and the responsibilities we hold in ensuring safe execution. It will explore how the concept of temporary works is applied to trial pitting — not just in terms of regulatory definitions, but in how design input shapes safe planning, coordination, and execution. The talk offers a designer’s view on balancing practical value with safety-led decision-making.
Trial Pitting - Health and Safety from a Main Contractor's Perspective
Jamie Graham, Pre-Construction Manager at Aarsleff Ground Engineering
This presentation explores the execution of trial pitting activities, highlighting key risks, controls, and best practices from a main contractor’s viewpoint. It will cover pre-planning, permit-todig procedures, service detection, supervision, and workforce protection, emphasising collaboration with subcontractors and adherence to industry standards to ensure safety, efficiency, and compliance throughout the investigation process.
The webinar is free to attend for Members and £50 (ex VAT) for Non-Members. To register, please click here.
The AGS Early Careers Poster Competition is back for a third year and this time, we want to hear your top five takeaways since joining the geoscience industry.
Whether you work on site, in the office or somewhere in between, we’d like you to design an eye-catching poster which showcases your top five industry insights that others should know about. These learnings could be focused on:
Site-based experiences
Safety challenges
Office or project management know-how
Lessons from training, meetings or mentoring
Networking and industry engagement
Unexpected discoveries
Your poster should be bold and colourful and aim to inspire both industry professionals and those entering the industry.
The winner will receive a £100 Amazon Voucher, free entry to the AGS Annual Conference on 19th March 2026 in London and have an interview regarding their winning entry published in AGS Magazine which reaches over 7,600 industry professionals six times a year. Ten runners up will win free entry into the Annual Conference. All posters submitted will be displayed at the Annual Conference.
To enter, email your A4 poster alongside your full name and company to ags@ags.org.uk before Friday 30th January.
Get a better understanding of roles in the industry, start your own network of professional contacts, access to projects and sites, two CPD workshops on CV and interview skills, and two-week work experience. This programme is also available to recent graduates who are looking for employment in the sector, those studying Masters courses and undertaking Postgraduate research.
APPLY NOW FOR THE 2025/2026 ACADEMIC YEAR.
Find the online application form at www.tinyurl.com/y9m3zbd6 or use the QR Code. The closing date for applications is 31st October 2025
Meet your mentor, explore the industry and discover what you want to be. If you put the effort in, we’ll give you what you need:
● Self-confidence and guidance
● Help to find where you fit
● Meeting like minded undergraduates and graduates also interested in the ground engineering and geotechnical engineering sector.
● A network to find your first job and the ones that follow
● Insights on how to convert your ideal job opportunity
● Training on searching, applying and interviewing
● Work experience to give your application an edge
We are looking for enthusiastic undergraduates who want to explore a career in ground engineering. You might be studying for a geology, civil or ground related engineering or environmental degree, or any that involves the built environment, soil, physical geography or similar.
Opportunity to be connected with a mentor working within the ground engineering and geotechnical sector.
We want our industry to properly reflect the diversity of people, cultures and experiences within our society. We welcome applications from all, but especially from people who may identify as one or more of the following:
● Someone who is from an ethnic or religious minority background
● Part of the LGBTQIA+ community
● Someone who is neurodivergent
● Someone who has a disability
● Someone who has been socially disadvantaged (i.e., young carer, low-income background, refugee)
We would also strongly encourage women who do not identify with any of the above, also to apply for the scheme, as historically they have also been underrepresented within the ground engineering sector.
If you are a person with a disability or a person who is neurodivergent and would prefer to apply in a different format or would like us to make reasonable adjustments to enable you to apply, please contact us at 020 8663 0947 and we will talk to you about how we can assist.
Places are awarded on merit and we expect you to be committed to the programme over its 6 month duration. In return you shall be supported and enabled to develop your potential and helped to find your first job in a well-paid, fulfilling and meaningful career.
NArticle contributed by Martin Griffin (Principal Geotechnical Engineer, GHD)
eurodiversity refers to the limitless variability of the human nervous system, influenced by environmental factors. It represents differences in how people think, move, process, and communicate, which can change throughout their lives. Neurotypical (NT) individuals are considered "ordinary," while Neurodivergent (ND)
individuals have variations in sociability, thinking, processing, learning, attention, mood, and other mental functions.
Neurodivergent conditions include Autism (1-2% of the population), ADHD (up to 5%), Dyslexia (up to 20%), and Dyspraxia (up to 6%). Other rarer conditions include Tourette Syndrome, OCD, PTSD, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia. These conditions are celebrated as natural variations of the human experience, with a significant proportion of the working population being neurodivergent. Individuals who are neurodivergent often have
overlapping conditions, each with unique strengths, experiences, and perspectives beneficial to the workplace and society. However, they also face unique challenges, requiring integrated, multidisciplinary approaches for effective support.
A disability is a condition that affects a person's daily life and work. In 2022/23, 16.1 million people in the UK had a disability, with 80% having hidden impairments. Disability prevalence increases with age: 11% of children, 23% of working-age adults, and 45% of adults over State Pension age are disabled. Disabilities can be physical, sensory, intellectual, emotional, or developmental. 83% of disabilities are acquired during a person's lifetime. By 2030, 40% of the working-age population is expected to have a long-term mental health condition. In our sector, disabilities include mobility impairments, mental health issues, visual or hearing impairments, and chronic health conditions. It's crucial to develop inclusive practices to accommodate diverse needs and ensure everyone can contribute effectively.
adjustments, provide support and make things accessible. You are also protected from discrimination if you are connected with someone who has a disability, for example, a family member or friend, or if you've complained about discrimination or supported someone else’s claim.
“ If you have a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and longterm adverse effect on your ability to carry out normal day-today activities. The Equality Act (2010) can protect you against discrimination in education, work and services provided for you.
To make things accessible, a disabled person or a neurodivergent person can receive support. Reasonable adjustments are changes an employer makes to remove or reduce a disadvantage related to someone's condition/impairment. These are specific to a person. They can be for physical or mental health conditions. They can cover any area of work. It is not enough for employers to provide disabled people with the same working conditions as non-disabled people. Employers must make reasonable adjustments by law. Yet it is vital to remember that some disabled people might not need or want adjustments, although this might change over time.
If you have a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on your ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, The Equality Act (2010) can protect you against discrimination in education, work and services provided for you. It can require employers, colleges, venues and service providers to make reasonable
Creating a dynamic culture of neuroinclusion is an ongoing journey of neurotypicals working alongside neurodivergent and disabled colleagues, revising practices / polices and readdressing attitudes and removing subtle acts of exclusion. When an organisation has a growing neuroinclusive culture, it means ongoing development of an environment where neurodivergent and disabled employees feel comfortable being themselves. For example, many neurodivergent people may not feel comfortable sharing their neurodivergence with their employer due to the harmful stereotypes, stigma, and
misinformation. When organisations can show they are learning more about neurodiversity and working towards being more inclusive, it sends a powerful message, internally and externally.
Often, working on-site can be notoriously demanding, with many tasks requiring physical strength, dexterity, and endurance. For individuals with mobility impairments or chronic health conditions, navigating
“ Inclusive design, adaptable work areas, and assistive technology, for instance, using a tablet as a data logger application, can help mitigate these barriers.
these physical demands can be challenging. Inclusive design, adaptable work areas, and assistive technology, for instance, using a tablet as a data logger application, can help mitigate these barriers. Flexible work patterns can also greatly benefit disabled employees.
Effective communication is pivotal in engineering and construction, where collaboration and coordination are key. Neurodiverse individuals experience challenges in traditional communication methods. For
instance, they might prefer visual aids or written instructions as a snappy bullet point over verbal communication. Understanding and accommodating these preferences can enhance productivity and reduce misunderstandings by neurotypical and neurodivergent employees alike.
Stereotypes and Stigma
Despite growing awareness, media stereotypes and stigma around neurodiversity and disability persist. Neurodivergent individuals may be unfairly judged as lacking competence or being difficult to work with, while disabled individuals might be seen as unable to perform certain tasks. These misconceptions can lead to discrimination and exclusion, undermining the potential contributions of these individuals.
Neurodiverse individuals often excel in areas such as pattern recognition, creative thinking, and complex problem-solving. For instance, individuals with dyslexia might have strong spatial reasoning skills, while those with ADHD could bring a high level of energy and innovation. In engineering and construction, where every project presents unique challenges, these skills are invaluable.
Diverse teams are known to drive innovation, as they bring a wider range of perspectives and ideas to the table. Neurodiverse and disabled individuals can offer fresh insights that might not be considered in a more homogenous team. For example, an individual with Autism might approach a problem with meticulous attention to detail, uncovering solutions that others might overlook.
Curiosity is a driving force behind scientific and technological advancement. Neurodivergent individuals often possess an insatiable curiosity that leads them to explore new ideas and question established norms. As Einstein famously said, “I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.” Curie echoed this sentiment, stating, “Be less curious about people and more curious about ideas.” This relentless pursuit of knowledge fuels innovation and discovery.
Pattern thinking is the ability to recognize and understand patterns in data and phenomena. Darwin’s observation, “My mind seems to have become a kind of machine for grinding general laws out of large collections of facts,” highlights the importance of pattern thinking in scientific inquiry. Tesla’s fascination with nature and his belief that “to discover the forces which
are active, and the laws which govern them, is the highest aim of the intellect of man,” underscores the value of pattern recognition in engineering and invention.
Perseverance is a hallmark of many successful scientists and engineers. Newton’s declaration, “My powers are ordinary. Only my application brings me success,” emphasizes the role of persistence in achieving breakthroughs. Curie’s advice, “We must have perseverance and above all confidence in ourselves,” is a testament to the determination required to overcome challenges and make significant contributions in engineering.
Creativity is the ability to generate novel ideas and solutions. Einstein described creativity as “intelligence having fun,” highlighting the joy and fulfilment that comes from innovative thinking. Tesla’s reflection on the satisfaction of seeing his ideas materialize—“Such feelings make man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything”—captures the profound impact of creativity on human achievement.
disabilities and those who neurodivergent. This includes ensuring physical accessibility, such as ramps and elevators, as well as ergonomic workstations that can be adjusted to meet individual needs. In construction sites, portable accessibility solutions should be implemented to accommodate workers with mobility impairments.
“ Educating colleagues at all levels about neurodiversity and disability is crucial in fostering an inclusive environment.
Flexibility in work arrangements can support neurodiverse and disabled individuals in managing their conditions. This includes flexible work hours, part-time work, compressed workweeks, job sharing, and employee choice in shifts. For example, remote work or flexible hours can help individuals with chronic health conditions or mental health disorders. Offering flexibility benefits both neurodivergent and neurotypical staff by empowering them and creating a culture of trust and loyalty.
Creating such an environment where neurodiverse and disabled individuals feel valued can significantly enhance employee satisfaction and retention. When employees feel supported and respected, they are more likely to be engaged and committed to their work. This, in turn, can lead to higher productivity and reduced employer turnover.
Designing accessible workspaces is fundamental to including individuals with
Educating colleagues at all levels about neurodiversity and disability is crucial in fostering an inclusive environment. Training programs can help fellow employees understand the strengths and challenges associated with different conditions, promoting empathy and reducing stigma. Consequently, all staff will benefit from training on disability and neurodivergence. Training is important for line managers, senior management, Human Resources (People Team) staff, and anyone working in inclusion. Line managers are the most important point of contact for any employee. Managers must access quality training to support and get the best out of their neurodivergent colleagues. When searching for quality training, make sure it values lived experience, has been developed with
neurodivergent people, and is evidence-based.
Awareness sessions/programs can highlight the importance of diversity in driving innovation and success. Breaking down barriers and enabling a shared understanding of disability and neurodiversity empowers participants to grow in emotional intelligence and allyship. Furthermore, awareness days/weeks are also one step removed from finding opportunities to be open about neurodivergence. Organisations with neurodivergent or disabled individuals can easily connect to Neurodiversity Celebration Week, International Persons With A Disability Day or other relevant awareness days.
These events can become tiresome, tokenistic, repetitive, fizzle out, and ultimately unproductive in raising awareness of differences within our workplaces. It is best not to do these once; they are more effective when creating several pieces of content over time, with different staff, rather than a one-off piece. Often, there remains some gestures or efforts of compliance towards members of minority groups, often for the pursuit of appearance or a CPD tick box rather than commitment to diversity and equity. The goal is awareness vents is to lead to acceptance and freely talking about neurodivergence and normalising it.
Adopting neuroinclusion lets neurodivergent people know your organisation is one where difference is valued; it is recognised as a key first step towards attracting fresh talent.
“ When people of an underrepresented group do not see themselves in our sector, they likely learn similar messages too.
Openly disabled and neurodivergent employees do not see themselves represented in STEM, many may internalise that such careers are not made for them. Before I graduated in 1995, I was one. I started my working life as a laboratory technician and then entered university by the back door, and a lot of hard work. When people of an underrepresented group do not see themselves in our sector, they likely learn similar messages too. When managers and senior leadership members are open about their neurodivergence, it creates an environment where employees and prospective employees feel comfortable bringing their whole selves to work.
Personal stories from managers are powerful actions in the workplace. Ask senior leaders or managers to create a blog, quote or article about their connection to neurodivergence for your organisation’s website or social media channels. This sends a powerful message. They could include their own experiences of neurodivergence in the workplace, what has helped them, and the challenges they have overcome. There is still a lack of representation
in higher positions, making it it difficult for future generations of employees to envision themselves in those roles, reducing the likelihood of them applying for promotions and remaining in the sector.
Sharing an agenda in advance is crucial for ensuring that everyone knows what to expect and can prepare accordingly. It's important to recognize that different people may have varying needs during a meeting. For instance, one person might prefer using a fidget toy to stay focused, while another might take detailed hand-written notes. In online meetings, offering the option to have cameras on or off can make participants feel more comfortable. Utilising supportive technology, such as AI notetaking, can also enhance the meeting experience.
When planning inclusive events, considering accessibility for one and all and therefore neuroinclusivity is essential. This includes asking staff and visitors if they need any support, offering a quiet space for those who feel overstimulated, and sharing information in advance, such as photos of the venue or directions. When selecting a venue, consider
the acoustics and whether the space is likely to be loud with lots of echoes. Additionally, think about the lighting and whether it can be dimmed slightly, and replace any flickering lightbulbs. If asking for feedback, include questions that consider other sensory differences to ensure a more inclusive environment.
Assisted technology (physical and digital) refers to any tool or device that helps individuals with neurological differences overcome challenges and perform tasks more easily. For neurodivergent individuals, this may include tools like noise-cancelling headphones, colour-coded calendars, or apps that help with time management and organisation. These technologies can be incredibly helpful for people who experience sensory overload, executive functioning, or other challenges.
Investing in assistive technology is a key strategy for inclusion. Other specific tools such as speech-to-text software, visual aids, and ergonomic equipment can support neurodiverse and disabled individuals in performing their roles effectively. In our sector,
specialised equipment that accommodates physical impairments can make a significant difference at a negligible cost.
Mentorship and Support Networks
Mentorship programs, such as the Ground Forum Undergraduate Mentoring Programme or those associated with professional membership bodies’ early career networks, can provide much needed support to neurodiverse and disabled individuals with the guidance and encouragement they need to thrive. Pairing these individuals with experienced mentors who understand their unique needs can enhance their professional development and help them navigate the challenges of the industry.
Employee Resource Groups provide a psychological safe place for employees to be authentic and find their tribe and support in the form of mentorship if required. These are networks given the correct support (leadership, volunteers, time, and budget) that have been shown to foster a climate of acceptance of diversity, driven by curiosity and collaboration. Welcoming diverse mindsets and creating inclusivity in all we do helps throughout the employee lifecycle, from attraction to induction to retention to promotion to separation. This removes stigma, to improve the well-being, and showcase the potential of employees. A neurodiversity network should be available to anyone who identifies as neurodivergent, diagnosed or otherwise, as well as parents of neurodivergent people and allies.
and unfair judgments by others. For people with more apparent disabilities, it results in the consistent need to prove your ability and competency. For people with less apparent disabilities, it results in the consistent need to prove our needs and conditions. For all of us, it is a consistent desire to be seen as a whole human with needs and abilities. Neurodiversity or being disabled isn’t something to fix – it’s a natural part of being human. Take the time to listen, learn, and celebrate the neurodivergent people in your life. We are different, not less, trying to fit into a world not built for us.
“ By implementing accessible workspaces, flexible work arrangements, training programs, assistive technology, and mentorship networks, our sector can be an environment where all individuals have the opportunity to thrive.
Living with a disability and or being neurodivergent means living with inaccurate
Our sector stands at a pivotal moment in its journey towards inclusion. Embracing neurodiversity and disability is not just a matter of compliance but a strategic advantage that can drive innovation, enhance problemsolving, and improve employee satisfaction. By implementing accessible workspaces, flexible work arrangements, training programs, assistive technology, and mentorship networks, our sector can be an environment where all individuals have the opportunity to thrive. As the sector continues to evolve, it's essential to recognise and celebrate the unique contributions of neurodiverse and disabled individuals. Our strengths, perspectives, and talents are invaluable assets that can propel the industry forward. By fostering a culture of neuroinclusion, ground engineering and construction can become a beacon of diversity, paving the way for a more equitable and sustainable future for one and all to belong and thrive.
Article contributed by Kathryn Eva (Senior Associate at Beale & Co) and Charlie Bayliss (Trainee Solicitor at Beale & Co)
The Building Safety Act 2022 (the “BSA”) established and introduced a regime with a particular focus on building safety and accountability, with enhanced requirements particularly for Higher Risk Buildings. The BSA covers certain obligations and duties that apply during the design, construction, occupation, and entire lifecycle of buildings, including record keeping and information requirements and the enforcement of breaches or claims (amongst other things).
This article touches on the new dutyholder regime and some of the key features of the
BSA that applies to designers and contractors that have arisen out of such regime, along with a high-level summary of other crucial matters such as Higher Risk Buildings, competency and limitation periods. The applicable legal and regulatory requirements must be considered on a project-specific basis, however.
The new regulatory framework under the BSA and associated regulations creates a new dutyholder regime. This regime places legal responsibilities on those who participate in the design and construction process. The dutyholder regime applies to all buildings to which the Building Regulations apply (and not just Higher Risk Buildings). The dutyholder regime will therefore be applicable to a significant number of construction projects.
By way of a summary, the five main dutyholder roles are as follows:
Î Client – any person or organisation for whom a construction project is carried out
Î Principal Designer – the Designer who is to plan, manage, monitor and coordinate the pre-construction phase. The Principal Designer is in control of the preconstruction phase.
Î Principal Contractor – the Contractor who is to plan, manage, monitor and co-ordinate the construction phase. The Principal Contractor is in control of the construction phase.
Î Designer – anyone who is to prepare or modify a design or instruct any person under their control to prepare or modify a design.
Î Contractor – anyone who manages work or directly employs or engages construction workers is a contractor.
These roles have the same names as those under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (“CDM Regulations”), but importantly are different in nature. The CDM roles focus on health and safety, whereas the BSA roles focus on compliance with the Building Regulations.
This article focuses on the role of the BSA/Building Regulations Designer and the Contractor only. Additional considerations apply to those acting as Principal Designer and Principal Contractor. It is important to note that the Client has the ‘automatic’ right to certify the Principal Designer or Principal Contractor under the CDM Regulations, as being appointed as the Principal Designer or Principal Contractor under the BSA notwithstanding that distinct duties and
regulatory requirements apply.
When acting as a Designer on a project, there are a number of duties that will apply to the professional performing this role1. Some of the key aspects of the Designer’s duties that you will be required to carry out are detailed below. Importantly, these obligations apply to the general duties and obligations imposed under the Building Regulations etc (Amendment) (England) Regulations 20232 for all professionals working under the dutyholder regime, i.e. the general duty to plan, manage and monitor.
Firstly, the Designer must not start work unless satisfied that the Client is aware of duties owed by the client. The Regulations place a positive obligation on the Designer to be satisfied of this.
“ The CDM roles focus on health and safety, whereas the BSA roles focus on compliance with the Building Regulations.
In addition, when carrying out the design work the Designer must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the design is such that if the building work to which the design relates were built in accordance with that design, the building work would be in compliance with all relevant requirements (i.e. the Building Regulations). The Designer must also take all reasonable steps to provide sufficient information about the design, construction and maintenance of the building to assist the Client and other designers etc. These obligations will be important and “all reasonable steps” must be taken to carry out these requirements.
If the Designer is carrying out only part of the design of the works, additional obligations apply. For example, the Designer must consider ‘other work which directly relates to the building work’ and report concerns as
to compliance of that work with the relevant requirements to the Principal Designer. Importantly, this places a positive checking obligation on the Designer to consider other works and also introduces a duty to warn requirement in the event that the Designer has any concerns with the compliance of the work carried out by others. Such positive obligations will require careful management by Designers on relevant projects. As a risk mitigation point, the extent of such obligations should be included in the professional’s scope and fee proposals.
It is important that, when carrying out the role of a Designer on a project, the obligations of a Designer under statute are understood by the Designer and their project team. The obligations and requirements discussed above should be reflected in fee proposals, scopes and contracts (provided the project is one to which the BSA applies). Records of compliance with the regulatory requirements should also be created and retained by the professional. Any changes to advice or design of the project should be properly notified to the
Client and recorded.
Finally, it is key to note that when acting as a Principal Designer, a number of additional duties will be required from the professional. Whilst not covered in this article, such duties and their implications will need to be fully understood and managed by the professional carrying out this role.
“ It is important that, when carrying out the role of a Designer on a project, the obligations of a Designer under statute are understood by the Designer and their project team.
In addition to the Contractors’ general duties regarding competence, there are additional duties imposed by the BSA and Building Regulations. A contractor must understand both their general duties and the more specific duties contained in the applicable regulations.
Firstly, as with the Designer, the Contractor must not start building work unless and until they are satisfied that the Client is aware of the duties owed by the Client. Again, this places a positive obligation on the Contractor to be satisfied of this point.
Contractors are under a strict obligation to ensure that the building work they, or any workers under their control, carry out is compliant with all relevant requirements (i.e. the Building Regulations). Unlike the duty applicable to Designers, this is not limited to taking “all reasonable steps” to ensure compliance.
Additionally, Contractors are required to coordinate and provide each worker under their control with appropriate supervision, instruction and information so that the building work complies with all relevant requirements.
The Contractor is required to take all reasonable steps to provide sufficient information about their building work to assist the Client, other contractors and designers to comply with all relevant requirements.
article, such duties and their implications will need to be fully understood by the contractor carrying out this role.
“ The Contractor is required to take all reasonable steps to provide sufficient information about their building work to assist the Client, other contractors and designers to comply with all relevant requirements.
Where the Contractor is carrying out only part of the building work which comprises a project, the Contractor must consider other work which directly relates to that building work and report any concerns as to compliance with all relevant requirements to the Principal Contractor.
The Contractor is required to provide advice to the Principal Contractor or Client (if requested to do so) on whether any work is Higher Risk Building building work.
The Contractor is required to cooperate with the Client, designers and contractors, including the Principal Designer and Principal Contractor, to the extent necessary to ensure that the work is in compliance with all relevant requirements.
When acting as a Principal Contractor, a number of additional duties will be required. Although we have not covered these in this
Before moving on to look at Higher Risk Buildings, it is important to note that it of course goes without saying that the professional consultant or contractor will need to carefully consider scopes of services/ works and scoping documents provided by a client on the project. Such documents should reflect the regulatory requirements of a Designer and/or Contractor (as appropriate) under the dutyholder regime and should not impose obligations on the professional that go beyond such regulatory requirements. Any additional obligations will need to be carefully considered not only from a programme and fee viewpoint, but also from a risk-exposure and a project delivery/compliance perspective (i.e. are the requested deliverables within your control and achievable?).
The BSA contains different definitions of Higher Risk Buildings (“HRB”) during the design and construction of a building and during its occupation. In England, HRBs during occupation:
Î Are at least 18 metres in height, or
Î Are at least 7 storeys, and
Î Contain at least two residential units.
Presently expressly excluded from HRBs during occupation are care homes, hospitals, secure residential institutions, hotels, and military barracks.
In England currently, HRBs during design and construction:
Î Are at least 18 metres in height, or at least 7 storeys, and
Î Contain at least two residential units, or
Î Are a care home, or
Î Are a hospital.
A project can be a HRB project either because it involves the construction of a new HRB or work in relation to an existing HRB. It is important for a party on a project to understand if the project involves a HRB, particularly as parties working on HRB projects will be subject to a number of additional enhanced obligations with which they are required to comply.
contribute to and update the Golden Thread. It is therefore important that the project team is aware of their responsibilities under the contract and legal requirements in respect of record keeping.
“ Where a building falls within the definition of a HRB, additional obligations and responsibilities are placed on all parties and dutyholders on the project...
Importantly, the Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry Phase 2 Report recommended that the definition of a HRB should be reviewed. This was acknowledged in the UK Government’s response issued earlier this year. We may therefore see a change in the not too distant future as to what will and will not constitute a HRB. It is worth also noting that different approaches are being taken in Wales and Scotland.
Where a building falls within the definition of a HRB, additional obligations and responsibilities are placed on all parties and dutyholders on the project, such as (amongst other things):
1. The ‘Golden Thread’ requirements3:
The Golden Thread requirements relate to information management. The regime has been introduced to ensure that high quality (digital) information in respect of a HRB and its safety is produced and retained so that it is available at all stages of a building’s lifecycle. All parties to the project will be required to
Both Contractors and Designers are responsible for creating and maintaining the Golden Thread information and for sharing information with the next dutyholder as the building’s lifecycle progresses, as well as with the Building Safety Regulator (“BSR”). While the ultimate responsibility for maintaining the Golden Thread retention system lies with the Client, the Principal Contractor and the Principal Designer, each dutyholder is responsible for maintaining their relevant information. There may also be additional requirements included in the contract terms and conditions.
Contractors and Designers will need to be proactive in maintaining and contributing to the Golden Thread. The Client should make arrangements for an electronic facility for holding and maintaining the Golden Thread, and access will be given to Designers and Contractors. For example, Contractors will need to take positive steps to contribute to the Golden Thread and provide (and obtain from subconsultants and subcontractors) the required information.
2. The gateway regime
The BSA introduced a gateway regime under which dutyholders must demonstrate, amongst other things, compliance with Building Regulations requirements4. The regime provides for strengthened regulatory oversight and rigorous inspection of building regulation before, during and on completion of building work. The regime helps ensure that
compliance with the regulations is considered by dutyholders at each stage of design and construction. As a part of the regime, the BSR will act as the building control approver. The gateway stages act has ‘hard stop’ control mechanisms. Contractors and Designers should therefore ensure that they do not start building work on a new or existing HRB until the requisite gateway building control approval has been met. When requested from the Client, the Principal Contractor or the Principal Designer will be required to assist with requests in preparing the gateway application, working together to provide the gateway information to the BSR. However, Principal Contractors, Principal Designers, Contractors and Designers should ensure that they do not provide assistance and/or take on services beyond their agreed scope or the applicable legal requirements.
It is important for Contractors and Designers to maintain high-quality records of any Golden Thread information and any information relevant to the gateways. This will help to ensure that records are maintained of what information was compiled (and when) and will contribute towards evidence that the dutyholders have complied with their respective Building Regulations requirements.
There are also related requirements for a system to be established and maintained throughout the construction phase to enable prompt reporting of every safety occurrence to the principal dutyholders. All dutyholders need to identify and share information about the nature of a HRB project to ensure all dutyholders comply with the new regulatory regime for HRBs. Any changes to the approved building design or construction of the HRB (or the approved plans, strategies and policies) should also be properly notified, recorded, and managed in line with the HRB regime5.
Whilst statutory timescales generally apply to the different stages of the gateway regime,
it is important to note that there have been industry reports of delays in obtaining responses and approvals from the BSR. It is therefore important to note this risk and include appropriate contingencies in respect of your scopes, fees, and programme (including by inserting entitlements to additional fee and time due to the HRB/gateway regime, change in law, or other potential changes or delays outside of your control).
One of the key focuses of the BSA is surrounding competency - both of the organisations working on a relevant construction project, but also the individuals assigned by those organisations to such projects.
The Regulations6 provide that this means that any person carrying out any building work or any design work must have:
a. where the person is an individual, the skills, knowledge, experience and behaviours necessary,
b. where the person is not an individual, the organisational capability, to carry out—
i. the building work in accordance with all relevant requirements;
ii. the design work so that the building work to which the design relates, if built, would be in accordance with all relevant requirements.
The importance of competency is further demonstrated in the Grenfell Tower Phase 2 Report.
It will therefore be important for both the professional and the individuals appointed by the professional to the project team to be competent (and to continue to review this as the project progresses). Such competency will need to be capable of demonstration by
both the professional organisations and the individuals.
The Building Regulations etc. (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023 define organisational capability as having the appropriate management policies, procedures, systems and resources, etc. in place. Processes (amongst other things) to demonstrate this capability should therefore be put in place by professionals working on a relevant project. When carrying out the dutyholder roles of a Designer and/or Contractor, there is also a general requirement for competence.
Given the definition of organisational capability, it will also be important that the professional has policies and processes in place in respect of the BSA. This should demonstrate competence generally and in relation to a specific project, and set out how the professional will approach the BSA and the dutyholder roles.
Competency will need to be assessed on a project-by-project basis, and we suggest that records of competency are maintained by individuals working on a relevant project. The professionals should carefully consider these records at the outset and before commencement of a project, with a view to ensuring that the appropriate (and competent) staff are appointed to the project team in question. In some instances, the contract may contain specific requirements in respect of competency, together with notice procedures (i.e. if there is a change in competency within the project team) and associated termination grounds benefitting the Client. Other clients are seeking competency declaration documents, which must be carefully reviewed by reference to the contract and project on a case by case basis (especially since some of these are more onerous than the BSA’s requirements).
It is important note that the competency requirements also apply to the appointment of subcontractors and subconsultants. Therefore,
it is good practice to complete appropriate due diligence (including on financial stability, competency and insurance) and to expressly manage this when negotiating future subcontracts.
As a result of the implementation of the BSA, there have also been changes to the limitation periods in which claims can be brought by one party against another. Two notable changes are set out below. Whilst not the focus of this article, given the importance of limitation periods, we have included comments on the limitation period changes below by way of a reminder.
The BSA has also had the effect of extending the limitation period in respect of when a claim can be brought under Section 1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972. The Defective Premises Act 1972 imposes duties on a person “taking on work” in connection with the provision of a dwelling or any part of a relevant building (a building consisting of or containing one or more dwellings). The Act requires property developers, professional consultants and contractors to work in a professional or workmanlike manner, to use proper materials, and to ensure that the completed dwelling is ultimately fit for habitation.
The BSA extended the time limitation period for bringing such claims:
Î from 6 to 30 years for works completed before 28 June 2022, i.e. this 30 year period applies retrospectively; and
Î from 6 to 15 years for future works completed after 28 June 2022, i.e. this 15 year period applies prospectively (applying to both Sections 1 and 2A of the Defective Premises Act 1972).
Section 38 of the Building Act 1984 (not yet in effect)
The BSA extends the limitation period under Section 38 of the Building Act 1984 to 15 years. This limitation period will apply prospectively and so the extended limitation period will only apply to work done after Section 38 comes into force. Section 38 of the Building Act 1984 gives a claimant/party the right to claim damages where they suffer harm because work on a building does not comply with the Building Regulations. This applies to any building to which Building Regulations apply (and not just Higher Risk Buildings).
Whilst Section 38 of the Building Act is not in force as at the date of this article, parties may see limitation periods in contracts referring to Section 38 of the Building Act 1984.
It goes without saying that it is important for all project documents and information to be maintained for the duration of a professional’s liability under a contract. Such documents and information will be invaluable in the event of a claim and may be required for contractual, regulatory or insurance purposes.
In light of the extended limitation periods, professionals should consider revising their document retention policy (particularly if the document retention policy is based on previous limitation periods under statute, which is typically 6 or 12 years). Project teams should be made aware of the document retention requirements under the BSA and applicable contract, such that those requirements are complied with on each project and the relevant documents are easily obtainable if required. Adequate insurance should also be maintained for this increased period of potential liability.
Whilst the BSA will apply to a number of construction projects, it may be that we see some of the requirement under the BSA
becoming best practice and creeping into all appointments (regardless of whether the BSA applies). This underpins the importance of ensuring that all professionals have a clear understanding of the BSA and how it may apply to each project, along with having policies and procedures in place to enable an organisation to comply with the requirements of the BSA.
It is safe to say that this is a quick moving landscape, and we expect that we may see further changes implemented in due course, particularly following the release of the Grenfell Phase 2 Report and the Government’s response paper issued late February this year. We therefore suspect that there will be further industry movements as the recommendations in the reports are put into play. Needless to say, it will be important that professionals have contractual protections in place in respect of further change, as well as the resources required to meet any further expectations or obligations.
If you would like assistance on the topics included in this article, health and safety, or the BSA more generally, please contact the author of this article.
1. The duties of a designer are set out in section 11K of the Building Regulations etc (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023.
2. Section 11J of the Building Regulations etc (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023.
3. The Building (Higher Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023 – Part 4
4. The Building (Higher Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023 – Part 5
5. For example, see The Building (Higher Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023 – Part 3
6. Section 11F of the Building Regulations etc. (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023
Job Title:
Geotechnical Engineering Degree Apprentice
Company: Jacobs
Can you provide an overview on your career history, current role, and responsibilities?
I am currently in the second year of my Civil Engineering Degree Apprenticeship, working within the Tunnelling and Ground Engineering team at Jacobs. My current role involves the writing of geotechnical reports across multiple stages of design such as desk studies, ground investigation reports and geotechnical design reports.
Alongside this, as part of my apprenticeship I am studying towards a BEng in Civil and Infrastructure Engineering at The University of Warwick. I attend lectures, seminars and practical sessions at the university for one week every month.
What attracted you into the industry?
Can you talk us through your poster design? Why did you decide to focus on the use of drone based survey techniques?
“ I have also been involved in detailed design within highways projects including retaining walls, sign foundations and earthwork repairs.
I have also been involved in detailed design within highways projects including retaining walls, sign foundations and earthwork repairs.
My passion for the industry stems from my study of A Level Geology. This science has always fascinated me, and studying Geology in sixth form introduced me to the engineering applications of the subject, particularly civil and geotechnical engineering. I researched into the sector and was fortunate to attain
this degree apprenticeship program which allows me to kick-start my career, gaining hands-on experience whilst studying towards a funded degree.
Despite not being directly involved with drone-based site investigation, I came across this innovative technique during a lunch and learn at Jacobs, which comprehensively introduced drone-based survey techniques and their scope for the future of site investigation. Inspired by this session, I created my poster showcasing the types of surveys possible and the advantages over traditional survey methods, as well as a case study where drones were used to conduct a remote site reconnaissance.
Apart from your work on drone-based survey techniques, have you been involved with any other innovative technologies within your day-to-day role?
In order to inform preliminary design and desk studies, I have used National Highway’s
Topographical Sur veys
Magnetometer Sur veys
Traditional sur veying methods can be time consuming, costly, and risky.
LiDAR Mapping
Ground
Penetrating Radar
Drones provide a faster, safer and more accurate way to collect site data.
Drones empower professionals to lead smar ter, safer site investigations
Case Study:
Coupled with machine learning, site features can be accurately identified
Rapid collection of high resolution data over large areas can be achieved.
As par t of the United Utilities Haweswater Aqueduct Resilience Programme, drones were utilised to conduct remote site reconnaissance This informed the access and working areas for a multi-award-winning ground investigation within this major infrastructure programme The sur vey replaced a traditional site walkover with the contractors, due to being under taken within the COVID-19 pandemic and having restrictions with group gatherings The sur vey results were shared with deliver y par tners to inform the logistics of plant and vehicles and ensure good health and safety planning This method was fast, costeffective and, most impor tantly, ensured the safety of all staff on the project
asset visualisation and information system, which utilises point cloud data and LiDAR to allow for advanced measurement tools in a 3D space. This allows for models and sections to be produced through areas of interest, proving useful for visualisation of sites and key features.
Can you predict an innovation which will dramatically change the geoscience industry in the next decade? Why have you chosen this innovation?
In my opinion, AI has the potential to dramatically change the industry by means of automating data analysis and interpretation, for example, accelerating the creation of detailed geological models. Efficient use of AI will allow real-time monitoring and predictive analysis for ground behaviour, ultimately leading to more efficient site investigation. If utilised correctly, AI can lead to optimised design and construction of infrastructure, ultimately making geotechnical and geoenvironmental practices safer, faster, and more sustainable. As demonstrated in this year’s AGS Conference, there are currently limitations and potential drawbacks of using AI within our profession, however these tools are continuously developing.
How did you find the AGS Annual Conference?
I found the AGS conference very beneficial, everything from the venue to the inspiring speakers was excellent. Being new to the industry meant that I learnt something in every presentation and conversation. It was also great to see my poster on display at the conference, alongside all the other fantastic entries. In particular I enjoyed the presentations on Generative AI in Ground Engineering, and The Expanding Role of Satellite INSAR in Risk Management.
What advice or words of wisdom that would you give someone who is considering entering the industry?
Don’t be afraid to ask questions! As an apprentice entering the industry straight out of school, I’ve found that asking questions isn't just about clarifying what you don't understand, it demonstrates a genuine eagerness to learn. It shows your colleagues you're engaged, thinking critically, and keen to grasp complex concepts, which in turn helps you build a solid foundation of knowledge and understanding much faster.
Article contributed by Mark Hill (The Pensions Regulator - ESG, Climate & Sustainability Strategy, Policy and Analysis)
To say we live in interesting times seems a bit of an understatement in 2025. Aside from global events, the UK is increasingly experiencing impacts of climate change with related extreme weather events (EWE), such as heatwaves and flooding.
These are exacerbating existing geo-related risks and causing damage, both directly and indirectly. The UK Government and the devolved administrations are committed to responding to the risks posed by climate change not least as part of the transition to a net zero nature positive economy. This presents both challenges and opportunities for the brownfield and construction sectors.
SiLCs Climate Change and Sustainability (CC&S) Sub-group was launched in March 2023
with the encouragement of then PTP Chair Dr Tom Henman, to address a potential gap and look ahead to what SiLCs would need to be able to advise on in the future. We had no idea how quickly this would become mainstream as an essential and indeed urgent part of our work; LCRM now embeds the principles of sustainability and the need throughout to consider climate change when assessing and managing risks from land contamination; other standards being updated and new technical guidance increasingly reference the need to consider sustainability and climate change issues.
The brownfield sector has a key role to play in achieving more sustainable development, adapting to climate change and enhancing biodiversity. Those of you who attended the excellent 2025 SiLC Annual Forum will have heard the insightful presentation by Andrew Fellows of RSK Geosciences on their work developing CIRIA good practice guidance for the development sector focussing on how climate change and EWE affect georelated risks. The related survey clearly highlighted awareness of and concern about the impact of processes such as flooding, erosion and slope stability that are made worse by EWE. In the finance sector, asset owners and insurers are increasingly concerned about what they term the ‘physical risks’ arising from climate change and potential for the stranding (unanticipated or premature write-downs, devaluations or conversion to liabilities) of assets not to mention the legal risks related to changes in policy and regulation.
promoting good practice in sustainable development, aiding the UK’s journey to Net Zero. It also aims to link with complementary groups within SiLCs member bodies (including AGS) and beyond to share knowledge and avoid duplication of effort. The Sub-group is currently collating resources to help equip SiLCs for the challenges they will be facing, be that to address climate change impacts, support material reuse, or reduce GHG emissions arising from remediation schemes. These resources will be accessible to all SiLCs through our new website: Specialist in Land Condition Register Ltd (SiLC) when it is launched.
“ The brownfield sector has a key role to play in achieving more sustainable development, adapting to climate change and enhancing biodiversity.
The CC&S Sub–group also invites speakers working at the leading edge of this area. For example, at our February 2025 meeting, Dr David Manning, Professor of Soil Science at Newcastle University presented his pioneering work using enhanced rock weathering, particularly of silicates, and the finest fractions of crushed concrete to improve carbon capture in soils. His work has exciting potential for brownfield developments as it also improves plant growth and earthworm counts.
We want SiLCs to be at the forefront of sustainable development, combating and adapting to climate change and reversing nature loss while contributing to growth and resilience.
If you are interested in knowing more, please do get in touch with either Claire Dickinson or Mark Hill via silc@silc.org.uk and we’d encourage all SiLCs to engage with the group.
The CC&S Sub–group's principal aim is to build knowledge, capacity and capability in climate change and sustainability considerations for land condition within the SiLC community whilst supporting the development of and
We are keen to hear about and showcase the great work being done by SiLCs in this area.
STANDARD SUBJECT / TEST
BS EN ISO 11074:2025 Soil quality - Vocabulary EN
BS ISO 17505:2025 Soil and waste characterization – Temperature dependent differentiation of total carbon (TOC400, ROC, TIC900) New
BS ISO 18386:2025 Soil quality – Screening method for soil temperature – Measurement by IR thermometer New
NA to BS EN 19972:2024 UK National Annex to Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 2: Ground properties
BS EN 1997-3:2025 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design – Part3 - Geotechnical structures
(a) This table is derived from the work programmes of BSI Technical Committees EH/4-Soil quality and B/526/3-Ground available for review and comment via AGS.
BS 8576 (revision) Guidance on investigations for ground gas – Permanent gases and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
DPC BS 10175 (revision)
Investigation of potentially contaminated sites - Code of practice
BS
BS
ISO FDIS 7303 Soil quality - Simplified method for oral bioaccessability of metal(oids) in soils New Will BS
ISO DIS 13196CEN prEN 13196
CEN prEN/ISO DIS 16703
Soil quality – Screening soils for selected elements by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry using a handheld or portable instrument
Environmental soil matrices – Determination of hydrocarbon content in the range C10 to C40 by gas chromatography.
BS
New
ISO FDIS 18400-105 Soil quality – Sampling – Part 105: Packaging, transport, storage and preservation of samples Will
ISO DIS/CEN prEN 18227
ISO TS 18718
Environmental solid matrices – Determination of elemental composition by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry Will EN
Assessment of soil functions and related ecosystem services: definitions, descriptions and conceptual framework New
Will be Technical Specification (TS) 2025 New
ISO TS 18721 Assessment of soil functions: indicators and methods New
Will be Technical Specification (TS) 2025 New
ISO CD/prEN 21251 Soil quality – Methods to estimate biogeochemical stability or residence time of organic carbon in soils New
ISO CD 25521 Soil Quality—Determination of inorganic arsenic species in soils and soil-like materials New
PUBLISHED STANDARDS (a)
New standard Published June 2025 Published March 2025 Published March 2025
B/526/3-Ground investigation and ground testing. Copies of draft standards (e.g. CD, DIS, prEN) are usually
BS EN ISO 13196:2013
New standard
period ended 23 March 2025
period ended 31 October 2024 2025/6 Will replace BS ISO 18400-105:2017 Comment period ended 18 August 2025. 2025/6
Will replace BS ISO 18227:2014 & BS EN 15309:2007
New standard Comment period ended 10 June 2025 2026/7
Equipe Training's specialist geotechnical training courses are delivered both in person at our dedicated training facility just outside of Banbury, Oxfordshire, and also online via Zoom!
Available upcoming dates are provided below:
Î 25th September 2025- Mastering the AGS Data Format
Î 1st October 2025- Professor David Norbury’s Soil Description Workshop
Î 6th November 2025 - Professor David Norbury’s Chalk Description Workshop
Î 19th November 2025 - Basic Foundation Design
Î 20th November 2025 - Further Foundation Design
Î 26th November 2025 - Earthworks Design & Construction
Î 27th November 2025- Slope Stability Design
Î 17th December 2025 - Understanding and Scheduling Geotechnical Laboratory Tests
Places on these courses can be booked online here, or via contacting Equipe on +44 (0)1295 670990 or info@equipegroup.com
Equipe Training and their health and safety training partners RPA Safety Services and EB Safety
Solutions are delighted to announce their collection of specialist health and safety courses for the geotechnical market have resumed being delivered in person, as well as being delivered online where required.
These courses are approved and certified by the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) and meet the requirements of UK Health and Safety regulations for working on geotechnical and land drilling sites. Upcoming dates include:
Î 16th – 18th September 2025 - IOSH Safe Supervision of Geotechnical Sites
Î 9th October 2025 - IOSH Avoiding Danger from Underground Services
Î 23rd October 2025 - Safe Working on Geotechnical Sites
Î 12th November 2025 - Managing and working with Asbestos Risk in Ground Investigation
Places on these courses can be booked online here, or via contacting Equipe on +44 (0)1295 670990 or info@equipegroup.com
AGS Members all share a commitment to quality in the geotechnical and geoenvironmental industry. This has become widely recognised by clients, governmental bodies and other associations that touch issues to do with the ground.
We welcome both companies and individuals who want to be recognised for their quality of practice to join our growing membership of over 130 Members. We shape our industry, continually improve practice and collaborate on issues that affect us all; from clients, all the way through to the people who use the land and the buildings we help develop.
To become a Member of the AGS, please visit http://www.ags.org.uk/about/become-a-member and submit your application online. Please note that all membership applications are reviewed by the Membership Committee 6 weeks in advance of each quarterly Executive meeting. The deadline for the next round of completed applications is 7th October 2025.
All Members of the AGS are entitled to free introductory advice on legal/contractual matters from AGS Loss Prevention Group member, Beale & Co.
If you’re an AGS Member and are looking for legal advice, please contact Beale & Co and quote ‘AGS Helpline’ where the first 15 minutes of legal advice will be free of charge.
(Please quote ‘AGS Helpline’)
LEGAL HELPLINE
Beale & Co
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7469 0400
www.beale-law.com
An online advertising campaign within the AGS Magazine will help to build and increase industry awareness of your company’s profile, initiatives and offerings.
The AGS can help build a package to suit your needs and budget; whether it’s a series of adverts across multiple issues, a combination of event sponsorship and advertising, or a single advertorial.
The AGS Magazine is a free email publication that looks at a range of topical issues, insights and concerns, whilst publishing new guidance notes, working group activities and information on upcoming industry seminars.
With 6 issues each year, our subscribers include industry professionals such as practitioners, chartered specialists, senior decision makers and managing directors
To receive a media pack or to discuss advertising rates, please contact Caroline Kratz on 0208 658 8212 or email ags@ags.org.uk
RATE: £165
Company
RATE: £50
All adverts should be sent in a PDF, PNG, JPEG, TIFF, PSD (Photoshop) or EPS (Illustrator) format.
All advertising artwork must be supplied in 114 dpi resolution.
Artwork must be delivered to the AGS using the agreed artwork specification size listed left.
Artwork should be emailed to ags@ags.org. uk no later than 10 days prior to publication.
The Geological Society
Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BG
020 7434 9944
hello@geolsoc.org.uk
ADVERTISE HERE FOR JUST £50
If you have any queries regarding AGS Data Format, there is a discussion forum on the AGS Data Format website, where queries can be posted and answered by the Data Format team.
If a Member has any issues with regard to Safety, Contaminated Land, Geotechnical, Instrumentation & Monitoring or Laboratories which you think the industry should be aware of please email ags@ags.org.uk, we will then forward your email to the relevant AGS Working Group.
All articles in the AGS Magazine are the opinions of the authors and are not intended to be a complete or comprehensive statement of the law, nor do they constitute legal or specialist advice. They are intended only to highlight current issues from date of publication that may be of interest. Neither the writer(s), nor the AGS, assumes any responsibility for any loss that may arise from accessing, or reliance on the material and all liability is disclaimed accordingly. Professional advice should be taken before applying the content of the articles to particular circumstances.