www.accesspress.org
Inside ■ Peru man inspiring - pg 3 ■ Buying a vehicle? - pg 4 ■ Legislative updates - pp 8-9
H i s t o r y
N o t e P 2
“Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one’s definition of your life; define yourself..” — Harvey Fierstein Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Mpls. MN Permit No. 4766
Volume 20, Number 5
Minnesota’s Disability
Community Newspaper
May 10, 2009
Cuts to health and human services programs anticipated by Jane McClure
special session or at worst a state government shutdown. The House bill passed 8549; the Senate passed its health and human services bill on a 40-23 vote margin. Cuts to health care in both bills are in the hundreds of millions of dollars, with the Senate making deeper cuts than the House. But Gov. Tim Pawlenty is proposed even greater cuts of $1.7 billion, which has set up a showdown between him and state lawmakers. Minnesota Consortium for Citizens With Disabilities, (MN-CCD) and the Arc of Minnesota and a host of groups have been rallying to oppose the cuts. But despite hours of testimony, rallies and organized call-in days, the picture doesn’t look good. In one letter to members, MN-CCD Coordinator Anni Simons wrote, “We are at one of the most critical times in the evolution of our communitybased services system – maybe the biggest challenge to the system we have ever faced. Individuals and programs are all at great risk. ” “In our previous alerts and Larry Lubbers and Rick Cardenas speaking out at the Capital updates, we’ve highlighted Disabled Minnesotans and advocacy groups may remember the 2009 session of the Minnesota Legislature as one of the most difficult they have seen. Despite the final outcome, brutal cuts to a wide range of health and human services are likely. Conference committees were working on House, Senate and
gubernatorial proposals as Access Press went to press. The House and Senate passed their health and human services bills late April, with House debate stretching far into the night. State lawmakers are to adjourn May 18 but many veteran capitol observers believe that will not be possible. That would bring the possibility of another year of a costly
provisions in health and human services spending proposals by both the Governor and the House that are unfair. We want fairness restored. But as bad as those proposals are, things are getting worse — and could get much worse. “ The Senate’s health and human services bill has greater cuts to some disability supports than the House bill, Simons noted. Nor has Pawlenty wavered on his cuts. She noted that the House bill may be “as good as it’s going to get” for people with disabilities. Another fear for MN-CCD is that the situation could deteriorate further as there are rumblings that some legislators who may have supported tax increases necessary to preserve the service system are getting skittish. If there is no tax increase, the House could make cuts twice as large as they’ve done already—or even larger, according to House Health and Human Services Finance Chair Rep. Tom Huntley, DFL-Duluth. A bleak economy, combined with rising costs and the un-
Katie Wornson Knaak (L) and Nikki Villavicencio-Tollison (R) joined in the rallied at the capitol to stave off cuts. certainties attached to federal economic stimulus funding, complicate debate over health care spending. Another wrinkle is that demand for services is rising while the state has less money coming in. Health care is the fastest-rising part of Minnesota’s budget. One looming factor in the debate between the governor
and DFlers is the prospect of tax increases to help cover the rising costs. Pawlenty has vowed to veto tax increases this session. The state is looking at about $2 billion in health care-related help from the federal government, as a result of the economic stimulus package. The Cuts - cont. on p. 11
Only $2 million eyed Department of Justice complaint outlines need for spending on accessibility by Jane McClure The Minnesota Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (MN-CCD) has filed a federal Department of Justice (DOJ) complaint against the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and a number of other governmental agencies, alleging that Minnesota’s highways, roads, streets and sidewalks aren’t in compliance with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). MN-CCD is a broad-based coalition of organizations of people with disabilities, providers and advocates, dedicated to improving the lives of people with disabilities. MNCCD’s primary focus is public policy issues. The DOJ complaint was filed last month against MnDOT, the Metropolitan Council and
the council’s Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). It also includes all or part of the 182 cities and townships within the seven-county metropolitan area including Minneapolis and St. Paul, as well as the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington. The state is receiving about $600 million for transportation and transit projects, with about half of that going to the sevencounty metropolitan area. The complaint alleges that the discrimination began in February of this year, with regard to discrimination on the basic of disability in the allocation of The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) transportation funding. The complaint also cites
Jan. 26, 1992 as the date that discrimination on the basics of disability in transportation facilities began. A number of violations were outlined in the DOJ complaint and noted in a letter by Joan Willshire, executive director of the Minnesota State Council on Disability. The letter stated that MnDOT has lacked an existing ADA transition plan, which has been required by law since 1995. MnDOT has the opportunity to address and to correct longstanding ADA violations, Willshire wrote, but the $2 million set aside isn’t enough. More funding is needed to make pedestrian bridges, sidewalks and curbs accessible. Disability advocates and organizations contend that vio-
lations have existed for decades. Interest in compliance has been heightened by the availability of federal economic stimulus funds for transportation and transit projects. ARRA funds sent to MnDOT for projects includes $2 million to correct ADA violations throughout the state, an amount MN-CCD and other disability community leaders describe as woefully inadequate. Some advocates have called for at least $30 million to address the violations. MN-CCD notes that replacing one inaccessible pedestrian bridge is estimated to cost $1 to $3 million. Add in bridges in greater Minnesota and the cost of replacing the bridges can rise to more than $30 million.
In the Twin Cities area alone, there are at least eight bridges accessible only by staircases. Another problem cited by disability advocates is deteriorated sidewalks along part of Highway 5/West Seventh Street in St. Paul. Some of the sidewalks have been rebuilt up to Randolph Avenue, but sidewalk improvements are needed between Randolph and downtown St. Paul. St. Paul also needs to spend $1.9 million to install more ADA-compliant signals and make other improvements, such as pedestrian push buttons, curb ramps and pedestrian signals at trunk highway intersections. Yet another issue is the need to replace pedestrian curb cuts throughout Hennepin County, at a cost of about $3
million. At least $44 million in needs have been identified in the metropolitan area alone. But one challenge for any project seeking ARRA funds is that projects need to be “shovel-ready,” with completed plans in place. How many ADA-related projects would meet that definition is unknown. In a recent update, MN-CCD leadership indicated that MnDOT has offered to discuss increasing the amount of funding put toward ADA-related projects. MnDOT officials have also indicated an interest in working with the disability community as the issues move forward. ■ Jane McClure is assistant editor of Access Press.