Learn About Fractional Ownership for The Investors of Real Estate Historically, the industry of real estate has been distinguished by a large number of mediators, high barriers to entry and material information asymmetry. This configuration is less than the ideal. Essentially, it has been unmodified for decades, creating frustrations and frictions for renters, sellers and buyers. It is no surprise, considering the enormous size of the sector of real estate and its economic importance, that a horde of start-ups has tirelessly worked in order to transform the several verticals of the chain of real estate value. If you have had work experience in Real Estate Fractional Investment for a considerable amount of time, you must have noticed how the capabilities of machine learning combined with ever-growing sources of data have supported the promise of i-Renters and i-Buyers to simplify the painful and time-consuming methods of renting or buying a property. Both models abolish frictions by allowing participants essentially to trade money for convenience. The latest string of news states that the majority of institutional investors have been putting billions of dollars in the markets of residential property in the United States and abroad. With extensive research, one can find the equivalent of i-Renters and i-Buyers that enables one to invest in domestic real estate in a quasi-instant and frictionless way. This article aims to answer why fractional ownership is relevant to investors of real estate, and discuss the criteria investors should look at while comparing platforms. What Are the Techniques for Fractional Ownership? As a substitute, fractional ownership investment of domestic real estate can be an attractive and innovative way to gain the same investment advantages as immediate property ownership without the corresponding friction. The concept of fractional ownership appears to be rather simple. The principle is that one owns an interest in some property besides other individual investors. However, its real implementation may take several different forms and shapes. Some observations on this rapidly growing space are stated below, after contrasting multiple investment platforms of real estate, for instance, Pacaso, ENTR, and Carde to name a few. 1. First of all, the quality and profile of the investable real estate majorly differ from one platform to another. For the preservation and accumulation of wealth, it is recommended to invest in first-rate properties in the centres of the cities over rural or suburban single-family homes. 2. Secondly, there is a broad spectrum of models for Real Estate Fractional Investment. At one end, one would find full-service platforms of investment that have encountered teams organising co-investing