ACHITECTURE AND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PORTAFOLIO IR.YARAI ZENTENO

P O R TA F O L I O

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY + ARCHITECTURE P O R TA F O L I O M s c . i r .Y A R A I Z E N T E N O

00 INDEX 01. TEM dissipation system (Master's Thesis) 02. Refurbishment of residential building: Zero Energy Approach.

03. Bustan: Zaatari co-housing and farming 04. Unity Towers: climate design 05. Bucky Lab: Iluminate me!

06. CINT - Nanotechnology and Investigation Centre (Bachelor's Thesis)

06 14

YARAI ZENTENO building technology engineer

20 38 52 56

I am a creative and disciplined person who aims to share ideas and built up solutions in a team. I can adapt easily and have extensive experience in both teamwork and leadership positions.

My goal as an architect and building technology engineer is to improve the built environment towards a sustainable future, with a focus on indoor comfort and energy saving, in order to improve architecture and comfort for users. I believe we all have a big responsability towards our country and its developing state.

personal information 17/03/1992 +52 1 8110200980 Monterrey, México yaraimariam@gmail.com Linkedn linkedin.com/in/ yarai-mariam-zentenomontemayor-406a36148

languages

digital skills

personal skills

• • •

Revit Autocad 3D Max Photoshop Illustrator Indesign Premiere Pro Rhinoceros Grasshopper Python Design Builder COMSOL Multiphysics Phoenics VR Sketchup CES Edupack DIANA FEA

Teamwork Organization Leadership Initiative

• • •

Spanish – Native Speaker English – 105 TOEFL IBT German – B2, Goethe Zertifikat Japanese – N4 JLPT (Japanese Language Proficiency Test) Italian – A2 French – A1

EDUCATION

PUBLICATIONS

MASTER’S DEGREE IN BUILDING TECHNOLOGY – TU DELFT, NETHERLANDS 2018 - 2020 Qualification awarded: Master of Science with a score of 8.5/10

EmergenSEA – Rumoer n.73 Content: Account of the EmergenSEA Symposium presenting the contribution of the speakers.

ISSN number : 1567-7699. (April 2020)

BACHELOR’S DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURE (HONORS MODE) – ITESM, MEXICO 2011 - 2016 Qualification: Bachelor Honorific Mention Diploma, with a score of 94/100

Conversations with Dr.Bucky Lab: The making of Bucky Lab – Rumoer n.70 Content: In collaboration. Interview with Dr. Marcel Bilow on the foundation of Bucky Lab TU Delft course and the importance of hands-on design approach. ISSN number : 1567-7699. (August 2019)

BACHELOR’S EXCHANGE – TU MÜNCHEN, GERMANY 2014-2015 Qualification awarded: International Honours Bachelor Diploma, with a score of 2.0/1.0

Ecozone and City Quarters- Emerging Technologies Content: In collaboration. Booklet of studio Emerging technologies – Freecity and Freeharbour of the Faculty of Architecture, TU München, with guest professor Jacob Van Rijs from MVRDV.

EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

WORK EXPERIENCE JUNIOR ARCHITECT - ODA , Oficina de Arquitectura, Mexico 2015 – 2018 Work at an architectural firm based in Monterrey, México whose main axes are sustainable buildings with the use of technology and research.

BOARD MEMBER OF BouT STUDY ASSOCIATION – TU Delft 2019-2020 Occupation or position held: Responsible for the organization of events, lectures, excursions, and the main symposium for the master program.

DIGITAL VISUALIZATION’S STUDENTS ASSISTANT – ITESM, MEXICO 2013 - 2014 One year internship as Assistant Professor and Project Tutor in Digital Drawing and Digital Visualization classes (Autodesk and Adobe)

MEMBER OF BouT STUDY ASSOCIATION – TU Delft 2018-2019 Occupation or position held: in charge of article edition.

AWARDS CONACYT Scholarship and generation representant 2018-20, I2T2 and CONACYT-Gobierno del Estado de Nuevo León Awarded at the beginning of master’s studies

DISEÑO PUNTO MX 2014 Volunteer at the annual symposium of Architecture, Digital art, and Design at ITESM, Campus Monterrey.

COMMUNITY SERVICE

1st Place - Lighting Workshop 2016, ITESM One-week project for innovative use of lighting and postproduction

VOLUNTEER AT TECHO 2017-2018 Organization and construction of emergency housing.

Recognition Graduation Project – PROYECTA Exposition 2016, ITESM Awarded toBachelor’s Graduation Project.

MiP y MES Regionales 2016 Social programme in collaboration with the business department that served entrepreneurs to start up a small company.

Scholarship for High Academic Talent 2011-16, ITESM Awarded at the beginning of Bachelor Studies

CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS Conference presentation “Thermal comfort and indoor air quality in hospital reception areas” at EGM Architecten, Dordrecht, Netherlands. March 2019

Vecinos del Río 2015 We developed a programme to encourage children from 6- 12 years old the enjoyment of reading.

Social Incubator “Caracol” 2013-2014 Piano Teacher at the Social Incubator “Caracol”.

facade design and development

01

tem DISSIPATION SYSTEM

location:

Monterrey, México

type:

Academic, Master Thesis

team:

Individual

ROLE:

Facade design and building physics EXTERIOR CLADDING

level:

Master Thesis, Master's Program

date:

2019-2020

supervisor:

Dr. Alejandro Prieto Ir. Eric van den Ham

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This graduation project focuses on a performance-based design, where the heat dissipation system’s design and its integration with the TE is explored and investigated, what parameters affects its performance, and, subsequently, their effect on the façade and the architecture of the building within a hot-arid climate in Mexico.

For this, a combination of experiments and simulations were used to determine the effect certain design parameters have on the thermal performance of the heat dissipation system. Parallel to this, an office case study was selected, and simulations performed to determine the ideal passive strategies for reduction cooling load in a hot-arid climate. A stepped methodology was used for the experiments and simulations for the heat dissipation system and a comparative evaluation on different passive design strategies for the office design was applied.

A simplified heat transfer model for the heat dissipation of the thermoelectrical technology was developed, where a series of design strategies were possible to be tested. Analysing the results determined which parameters had a greater impact on the design, for the heat dissipation system its performance was evaluated through its COP, and for the office design lower cooling loads were the defining parameter.

General trends were identified on both evaluated levels and each show their potential. These were then translated into design guidelines for the heat dissipation system and office building design and then visualized as a final thermoelectrical facade design. The final COP of the cooling system based on the heat dissipation designed was 1.40. An evaluation on the designed TE façade was done, its limitations and potentials stated, as well as future possibilities that be further developed with this technology.

EXTERNAL HEAT SINK TEM INSULATION INTERNAL HEAT SINK VENTILATION CAVITY MAIN INSULATION

FOCUS PARAMETERS

DESIGN LEVELS

Building Typology and system

SCALES TO BE DESIGNED

Cooling Demand Q

4.27%

1.22% 1.32%



12.39% 

78.30% 









6

8

10 12 14

Parks

16 18 20 22 21 Time

Graph 1.Histogram for office air-conditioning (summer), redrawn from:(Daniels, 2002)

PELTIER MODULES

Figure 2.Location of city of Monterrey in México

Pumping

Buildings

Public lighting

Graph 4.will Distribution of increase total energy consumption on services in Monterrey.

Source: continue to in the upcoming years, as a result of migration to the(Secretaría main cities.de Energía, 2015)

It should be noted that even though Mexico City has almost double the number of inhabitants, Nuevo León is up to par in total energy consumption. This can be due to the region and average temperatures that can reach both cities,Thermoelectric Monterrey reaching more extreme temperatures.

Although an analysis materials can be used for either cooling or by Morales Ramírez shows that the increment in economic activity in theinregion has a higher impact power generation as it can be seen the image below.

Its on the total energy consumption, as their income for such increases, rather than the that, type of climate the construction consists of N services and P semiconductor arrays, when applying heat source Northeast region has.

(Morales & Luyando, 2014) on one side and a cooler heat

Figure 1.Peltier Module Mechanism (source: https://www. medicaldesignandoutsourcing.com/thermoelectric-cooler-solutions-formedical-applications/)

CLIMATE CONTEXT

Fields

Figure 5. Distribution of total energy consumption on services in lives there, having around 736 Source: habitants per km2. Trends de studied

by INEGI2015) also show that this number Monterrey.

(Secretaría Energía,

Figure 3. Scales to be designed

sink to the other side, electric power is produced, and vice versa. Electric power can be converted then to cooling or heating by reversing the current’s direction. (Zheng, Liu, Yan, & Wang, 2014) In essence the Peltier modules work as heat pumps when a direct voltage is applied, where the cold side absorbs heat from media and remove the absorbed heat to the environment. In the past 15 years, a lot of research has been put into thermoelectric energy and for some time TEMs have been used for cooling and heating applications in military, aerospace and electronic instruments. (Aksamija, Figure 17. Cities belonging in the metropolitan area of Monterrey.

Aksamija, Counihan, Brown, & Upadhyaya, 2019)

The average yearly temperature is 20 °C, and the maximum average is 32°C from May to August, and the minimum average is 5°C, in January. Rainfall is present mostly at the end of the summer period, in September.

1 Configuration 2 Delivery Method

Figure 7. Level B design strategies

DESIGN PARAMETERS

Figure 4. Average temperature and precipitation in Monterrey Figure 18. Average temperature(Meteoblue.com, and precipitation in Monterrey 2019) (Meteoblue.com, n.d.)

It should be noted that the temperature is above 20 °C most of the days of the year, and even though the highest average temperatures amount to 32°C, some days in the summer temperatures reach higher values, with extremes of 45°C and average values above of 22°C in the urban areas. (Secretaría de Energía, 2015)Throughout the year it is mostly sunny or partly cloudy as it can be seen from the graphs below.

1 WWR 2 Insulation 3 Glass type 4 Shading 5 Ventilation

1 Configuration 2 Delivery Method

1 Thickness 2 Extended Surface 3 Material 4 Transfer Type

Figure 6. Overall design Parameters per level

evaluation of design parameters component level experiments

component level analysis 

  



 



 NATURAL CONVECTION ΔT: 20.13 °C HS Hot side: 38.95 °C HS Cold side: 18.82 °C

Figure 11. Experiment Physical Set Up





FORCED CONVECTION ΔT: 24.13 °C HS Hot side: 39.72 °C HS Cold side: 15.58 °C





Figure 13. Experiment Infrared photos (example)



component level Simulations



  















 



 



 

  



 



 Qc 11.87 W Qh 19.17 W COPh 2.63 COPc 1.63

Figure 12. Simulation types for the different design strategies

Qc 12.09 W Qh 19.39 W COPh 2.66 COPc 1.66

Qc 11.96 W Qh 19.26 W COPh 2.64 COPc 1.64

Qc 12.00 W Qh 19.30 W COPh 2.64 COPc 1.64



Qc 11.74 W Qh 19.04 W COPh 2.61 COPc 1.61

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 9.Simulation path and design path ilustrated

Figure 8.Air flow simulations (example)

building level Simulations



building level analysis Strategy Comparison 250.00

Load (kW/m2)

200.00 150.00 Cooling Load 100.00

Lighting Load Heating Load

50.00

Figure 10.Baseline Design Builder Model – Case Study

0.00

Graph 3.DesignBuilder simulation results for the peak loads at zone level

Baseline

WWR

Glass Type

Shading

Ventilation

R Variations Graph W 2.WStrategy Comparison

All

COMPONENT DESIGN AND SYSTEM GUIDELINES

FACADE CONSTRUCTION

component design

FACADE MODULE BY FUNCTION  Internal Heat Sink, aluminium

Transition Block, copper TE module Transition Block, copper Interior wall Internal Air Cavity Insulation

External Heat Sink, aluminium







   

   

For the required intake For theofrequired fresh airintake from the of fresh air from the outside, the inlet outside, is locatedthe at inlet the top is located of the at the top of the panel, below the panel, panel’sbelow mullion. theItpanel’s was mullion. It was locoted at the toplocoted of the at panel the as topper of the panel as per the results at level C. results Additionally, at level toC. avoid Additionally, the to avoid the mixing of this air mixing with theofventilation this air with of the the ventilation of the external heat sinks, external this passage heat sinks, is closed this passage off is closed off for the module type for FS the1, module only for type theFS first 1, only for the first 500 mm of the panel.

500 mm of the panel.

The next panel inThe the next system, panel FSin2.1 theissystem, one FS 2.1 is one that allows air from thatthe allows interior air inside from the theinterior inside the interior air cavity of interior the façade. air cavity It isofcloser the façade. to It is closer to the fresh air module the since fresh at airpeak module days since this at airpeak days this air is expected to beislower expected than to thebeincoming lower than the incoming from outside, thusfrom aiding outside, furtherthus in the aiding condifurther in the conditioning of the office tioning floor.of the office floor.

Cladding

Figure 14. Final component configuration.

cooling system design and calculation Divided Air fresh system Fresh air volume Duct Diameter required Desired air velocity Duct Width Duct Length CSA(cross sectional area) Actual air velocity TEM quantity per system Façade elements per system TEM quantity per façade

0.2175 m3/s 0.30 m 3.0 m/s 0.08 m 1.4 m 0.1 m2 2.72 m/s 324 6 (F1)/ 8 (F2) 54 (F1) / 36 (F2)

Table 1.Initial values for fresh air divided system

+FACADE TYPES ZONE 1

F2

06-09 COMPLETE SYSTEM ZONE 2

F1

ZONE 4 Fresh Air Intake Air recirculation

ZONE 3

FS 3 FS 2

Air cooling Air Suppy

FS 2.1  FS1

1

{3D}

Figure 15.Façade module type assignment per floor plan

Figure 16. Facade modules by function

04 DESIGN

89

FAÇADE TYPE 1: FRESH AIR INTAKE

facade layering

facade details FS 1 - FRESH AIR INTAKE



A section view of the system application throughout a complete floor and the parts of the system that meet. This particular example shows the air outlet to the interior of the office once the recirculation and conditioning process has occurred on the other panels. The elevation also shows a reduced window size to that of the original building and the exterior cladding can be 1.

Double glazing with low E-coating customized according to taste.

  The next step was to establish the layers the thermoelectrical system required to function, as per the guidelines found on the previous stages.

2.

Standard Schuco unit, transom 150 mm

3.

Ventilation slot connected to TEM system

4.

External Cladding

1

5.

Heat Sink towards the exterior, 30 mm x 225 mm

2

6.

TEM system insulation, 30 mm- EPS

7.

TEM system, transition plates plus TE module (TEC-127)

8.

Heat Sink towards the interior, 30 mm x 125 mm

a. fresh air damper and regulation

FAÇADE TYPE 1: FRESH AIR INTAKE 223

FS 1 - FRESH AIR INTAKE

3 4 30 30

5



80

50

6 7 8



9.

Air distribution and cooling channel, 80 mm

10.

Ventilation outlet for exterior heat sinks, 20mm

Double glazing with low E-coating 11. 1.Anchoring to structural slab/beam

B

2. a. Concrete Standard Schuco transom 150 mm anchors,unit, 85 mm

9

3. b. I-section Ventilation slot to connected to TEM system fixed slab by anchors

12.

223

10



External Cladding 13. 4.Main thermal insulation 50 mm- EPS Heat Sink towards the exterior, 30 mm x 225wool mm 14. 5.Steel stud farming system filled with mineral

1

TEM system insulation, 30 mm- EPS 15. 6.Air damper and filter 7.

TEM system, transition plates plus TE module 15. Ventilation grill (TEC-127) 16. Acoustic ceiling, mineral fibre and insulated with 8. Heat Sink towards the interior, 30 mm x 125 mm EPS 9.

Air distribution and cooling channel, 80 mm 17. Rubber for level change for condensation 10.

Ventilation outlet exterior heat sinks, 20mm collection at end of for panel

2 3 4

A

A

30 30

5

12



50

6 7 8

B

9

11.

a. Concrete anchors, 85 mm 12.

13.

Thermal insulation 40 mm- Mineral Wool Main thermal insulation 50 mm- EPS

B -FRESH AIR INTAKE 14. Steel stud farming system filled with mineral wool

10

1 15.

15.

 A



Anchoring to structural slab/beam b. I-section fixed to slab by anchors

2500

11



80

245.5



a. fresh air damper and Mineral regulation Thermal insulation 40 mmWool

108.5

2

A

16 11

2500

12

Ventilation grill

16.

Acoustic ceiling, mineral fibre and insulated with EPS

17.

Rubber for level change for condensation collection at end of panel

3

245.5



Air damper and filter

4 B -FRESH AIR INTAKE 30 30



5

Figure 17. Facade development step 3

108.5

17

16

SCALE 1:10

SCALE 1:10

SCALE 1:10

SCALE 1:10

6

80

50

1

2 7 83

94 SCALE 1:5

5

6

30 30

80

50

For the horizontal connection of the panels, a special profile had to be designed when two panels that are distributing air meet. The detail shows the air inlet created by the end profile attached to the panel mullion and to the profile facing the interior. Proper sealants must be added to avoid that any air escapes the system. In addition, the aluminum profiles have to be insulated to avoid undesired change in temperature of the air.

HORIZONTAL CONNECTION DETAIL 22

21

20

HORIZONTAL CONNECTION DETAIL

13

19

9

7 8 5 4

6

2

Air Extraction

FS 1.0

22

21

20

13

19

9

6

7 8 5 4

2

FS 1.0

FS 1.0

500

500

FS 1.0

500

1500

SCALE 1:10 500 FS 2.1 - AIR RECIRCULATION

500

500

2.

21

C - PANEL CONNECTION 30

15 16

22

14

21

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

13.

FS 3 - AIR SUPPLY INTO OFFICE (V2)

19.

20.

21.

22.

Double glazing with low E-coating

2.

Standard Schuco unit, transom 150 mm Standard Schuco unit, transom 150 mm 3.

Ventilation slot connected to TEM system External Cladding fresh air30 damper and regulation Heat Sink towards thea.exterior, mm x 225 mm 4.

External Cladding TEM insulation, 30 unit, mm-transom EPS 2. system Standard Schuco 150 mm 5. Heat Sinkplus towards the exterior, 30 mm x 225 mm TEM transition plates TE module 4. system, External Cladding (TEC-127) 6.

TEM system insulation, 30 mm- EPS 5. Heat Sink towards the exterior, 30 mm x 225 mm Heat Sink towards interior, 30 transition mm x 125plates mm plus TE module 7. the TEM system, 6.

TEM system insulation, 30 mm- EPS (TEC-127) Air distribution and cooling channel, 80 mm 7.

TEM system, transition plates plus TE module 8. Heat the interior, 30 mm x 125 mm Main thermal insulation 50Sink mm-towards EPS (TEC-127) 9. forAir distribution and cooling channel, 80 mm Structural support heat sinks 8. Heat Sink towards the interior, 30 mm x 125 mm 10.

Ventilation outlet for exterior heat sinks, 20mm Interior Coating (desired) 9.

Air distribution and cooling channel, 80 mm 11. Anchoring to 50 structural slab/beam Standard 65, mullion mm 13. MainSchuco thermalUSC insulation 50 mmEPS a.

Concrete anchors, 85 mm Panel opening for air (20 mm); special profile 19. Structural support for heat sinks connection to mullionb.and structure; I-section fixedcondensation to slab by anchors 20. Interior Coating (desired) collection 12.

Thermal insulation 21. Standard Schuco USC 65, mullion40 50mmmm Mineral Wool

13. Main insulation 50 mm- EPS 22. Panel opening for airthermal (20 mm); special profile connection and structure; condensation 14.to mullion Steel stud farming system filled with mineral wool collection 15. Air damper and filter

SCALE 1:5 FS 3 - AIR SUPPLY INTO OFFICE (V1) SCALE 1:5 13

14 15 16

16.

Ventilation grill

17.

Acoustic ceiling, mineral fibre and insulated with EPS

18.

Rubber for level change for condensation collection at end of panel

19.

Structural support for heat sinks

223 mm

External Heat Sink ventilation

22

1.

4000 mm

1500 223 C - PANEL CONNECTION SCALE 1:10

Air Inlet FS 2.1 (to cool down)

Air Supply (Recirculation/cooled down)

20. Interior Coating (desired) 21.

Standard Schuco USC 65, mullion 50 mm

22. Panel opening for air (20 mm); special profile connection to mullion and structure; condensation collection

Figure 18. Left: Faรงade section with air outlet and extraction; right: exterior elevation

towards 02 REFURBISHMENT ZERO ENERGY DESIGN location:

Delft, The Netherlands

type:

Studio Project

team:

Groupwork Maximilian Mandat, Tom Elands

ROLE:

Building Concept, Energy Calculations and Building Physics analysis

level:

2th Semester, Master's Program

date:

March 2019

supervisor:

Prof. Dr. ir. A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen Ir. S. Broersma Dr. ir. L.J.J.H.M. Gommans

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The aim of the course is to transform an energetically poor performing 60’s residential building block in Delft, The Netherlands into a multifunctional one with zero energy performance. The building to analysis and refurbish is Prof.

Evertslaan and will be described in depth in the pertinent section.

Prof. Evertslaan is a very typical dutch building from the 1960’s, that is why this building is perfect to be used as representative project about transforming these types of buildings. Research question: Is it possible to convert an existing residential building with a poor energy performance into a zero energy multifunctional building? If yes, through which passive and active system will this be accomplished?

ANALYSIS of existing building

Figure 19.Potential thermal storage(Energie atlas, 2019) Figure 22.Similar buildings in neighbourhood (Energie atlas, 2019) Potential for thermal storage on the site. This map shows there is a possibilty of using this solution to store 420-440 GJ/ha/year. This could help in achieving the zero energy goal.

Figure 20.Windspeed map(Energie atlas, 2019) In this analyses the windspeed is overlayed on the site. It becomes clear that wind energy might not be the best idea to implement in this design.

Figure 21.Solar panel potential(Energie atlas, 2019)

These buildings are all based on the same concept and have comparable dimensions. This could be used to make a design that works for one of these buildings which could then be implemented in all of them.

Figure 23.Building height(Energie atlas, 2019) The Professor Evertslaan building is a lot taller then the buildings surrounding it. This could be used as an advantage for something like implementing solar panels in the facade.

Figure 24.Solar panel on roof potential(Energie atlas, 2019)

An analysis on the existing façade was also necessary to fully understand the building. The Dutch Building Law (Bouwbesluit) describes the minimal insulation values (R-value) described of the building skin (Isobouw, w.d.): ● For façade the R-value should be minimal 4,5 m2K/W ● For roof the R-value should be minimal 6,5 m2K/W ● For floor the R-value should be minimal 3,5 m2K/W However these regulations are intended for buildings that need approval for construction. This means that currently existing older buildings rarely meet these standards. These regulations can be taken into account when looking at the renavtion of the building however.

Figure 25.Existing Building floor plan and section

ANALYSIS of existing building The existing building does not comply with Dutch U-value regulations, and a quick thermal bridge analysis showed a heat escaping through the window area.

A R-value of 4.5 m2K/W is required.

facade material analysis MATERIAL TRESPA PLATE TRIPLEX GLASS MINERAL WOOL CONCRETE PUR TOTAL

energy generation possibilities λ (W/m2K) 0.3 0.2 0.032 2 0.026

COMPONENTS GLAZING (DOUBLE GLAZED FILLED WITH ARGON) ALUMINIUM FRAME TOTAL (U1*A1 + U2*A2)/(A1+A2)

D (MTS.)

Rc (m2K/W)

0.006 0.019 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.175

0.02 0.095 1.56 0.025 1.92 3.63

AREA m2

U-VALUE W/m2K

U*A

5.07 5.22

1.8 1.70

9.126 8.87 1.75

The yearly total radiation calculated with ladybug for the roof was 603,210 kWh/m2 in an area of 639 m2.

Option two with the roof panels oriented towards the south.

energy existing conditions

energy performance AFTER REDESIGN

Figure 26.Existing Building facade section

Figure 27.Cold Bridge Analysis

overview of interventions

facade section with changes PRODUCED BY AN

1: Thermal line ( thermal line is as straight as possible to reduce heat loss and avoid heat and cold bridges.

2: PV Panel: Only positioned according to our solar analysis.

AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK 3: Mycelium insulation 4: Mounting hook 5: Timber sub construction for the PV Panel. The timber is protected from rainwater. If it gets wet due to heavy wind, it can dry out fast. This reduces the risk of mold and rotting.

6: The window reveal offers the students nice spot to read a book or enjoy a coffee.

SOUTH WEST FACADE

NORTH EAST FACADE

1 2

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

3

4 5

6

STUDENT

facade section with changes PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

1: Handrail 2: Concrete Planter 3: Steel sub construction 4: Openable TGU glazing 5: Fixed TGU glazing

NORTH FACADE

BALCONIES BECOME LOGGIAS

GREENHOUSE ROOF

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

4

5

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

3

DESK STUDENT VERSION

2

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

1

social investigation + computational design

ZAATARI 03 BUSTAN: CO-HOUSING AND FARM location:

Zaatari camp, Jordan

type:

Studio Project - Earthy

team:

Groupwork: Shasan Chokshi, Akash Changlani, Elisa Vintimilla, Patrattakorn Wannasawang, Kazi Fahriba Mustafa

ROLE:

Configuration concept, urban concept, python coding, building physics analysis

level:

3th Semester, Master's Program

date:

March 2019

supervisor:

Prof. Dr. Ir. Sevil Sariyildiz, Dr. Ir. P. Nourian, Dr. Ir. Fred Veer, Ir. Hans Hoogenboom Ir. Dirk Rinze Visser, Ir. Shervin Azadi & Ir. Frank Schnater

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

BUSTAN was developed from the refugees’ perspective, looking at opportunities that could be taken from their immediate context and merging it with their traditional housing typologies and culture. BUSTAN’s goal was to become a co-housing system that adds value to the land, enhances living conditions and economic development through agriculture.

The course AR3B011 EARTHY at TU Delft, Building Technology Master programme had the aim of creating a set of projects that would help improve the living conditions in the Zaatari camp for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Within the course a diversity of topics, ranging from programming to the construction and structural design were addressed. One major challenge was the construction of all these projects with what was available at the site, mainly earth.

Adding it all, BUSTAN became a set of guidelines for the refugee to build their own house. The project goes all the way from the detailed elements such as a catalog for the openings or the perfect way to lay each adobe brick, all the way to an urban configuration that grows with the camp and finally becomes a city worthy of their culture.

CONTEXT ANALYSIS

Housing

Zaatari camp Villages Main road

Camp Roads

Main roads

Commerce

Caravans

Caravans+tents

Tents

Entrances

Services

Zaatari camp Olive orchard

Camp Roads

Creek roads

Wall

water reservoir water storage Creek 0-10% unused land Camp roads

Figure 28. Zaatari Context Based on Krujit, R. (2014)

Topography

Figure 29.Zaatari Camp Layers

11-30% unused land

31-50% unused land

Figure 30.Zaatari Camp Information based on UN High Commissioner for Refugees (2014)

SOCIAL ANALYSIS

     Figure 34. Adman and family, Edstram M. (2014)

Figure 32. Social Context in Zaatari Hannon, M. (2015)

 

    

  





Figure 35.Women Activities, Herwig, C. (2014) 

Figure 31.Social Context in Zaatari Hannon, M. (2015)

90 % 3,000 680 65% 360 200 5 500,000

Refugees from Daraa Small shops Shops with employed children Employement Water truck arrivals per day Children born per month Schools Pita breads distributed per day

Table 2. Zaatari in Number, based on Kruijt R. (2014)



 Inside the camp

Outside the camp

In 2015, Cash for Work (CfW) activities was developed by the Basic Needs and Working Group (BNLWG). As of 2018, around 15% of the total Zaatari population worked inside the camp.

Since July 2016, the Jordanian government has granted more than 100,000 work permits to Syrian refugees, allowing them to work legally.

  

 Figure 33. Living situation in Zaatari based on Stromme L. (2013)

Table 3.Working in Zaatari



PROPOSED SOLUTION 



 

 

 



 







  



Existing system based on Krujit, 2014

 







Proposal: Circular system





Projects in Master plan

Figure 36. General Proposal, Circular System within Zaatari

Empower them to grow their own food, create employement

Bring vegetation inside the camp

Design earthy buildings for living and sleeping

Adapt caravans for wet areas

Potentialize courtyards with greenery and production (farm)

Modular structure adaptable to different family sizes

Grouping of shared services

Contribute to better climatic coditions in the interior

Establish communities with shared but private spaces

Figure 37. Bustan Proposal

rules and system developed    

 

  

 



   

   

 

 

  

  

   

   

 

  

 

 

    



 

   

  

    

   

Figure 38. Bustan rule system

urban computational development of clusters

5

6 







7

      

8





9

  



10

Figure 39.Urban Manual Configuration

Figure 41.Urban Computational approach Parts of the script for the creation of the clusters were used from other authors in the food for rhino blog webpage. Some were then modified and parts added so that it would perform accordingly to our set of rules (Please refer to the Rhino and grasshopper file).

The different cluster size and amount was defined (this would be the input of families wanting to live together). Some problems with the creation of the rectangles was encountered since they were placed all together as a puzzle, and the wish was to allow for circulation space in between the clusters, so a modification of the equation (6) was done to (8), so that the second corner of the rectangle jumped half a space to allow this ventilation space we defined in our rules (Sabat).

The creation and placement of the rectangles was mostly random, for now we established the bigger cluster and facilities as the first two to be placed within the grid, but this could be changed depending on the input of the family, changing parameters of (9). Finally, we obtained such an iteration of large, medium, small clusters and a facility (the square) (10).

A final urban distribution scenario was done to show all the rules applied. In this way the spaces between the cluster created interesting passages such as the Sabats and the combination of more cluster create da common plaza that could later connect with a school if needed. Thus created a new sense of city within the camp.

Figure 40.Images of sabat and plaza

CLUSTER SCENARIO FOR 7 FAMILIES TOGETHER

B



B

A

N

A 







Figure 42. Plan of case scenario (7 families, 21 people) Figure x: Cluster plan for 7 families with 21 people

cluster scenario architectural sections

Figure x: Cluster section A







Figure x: Cluster section A









Figure x: Cluster section A









Figure x: Cluster section B











Figure 43. Setion 1-1'

Figure x: Cluster section B









Figure x: Cluster section B









Figure 44. Section 2-2"

Figure x: Cluster section A









tool development for earth brick placing A compass was designed to create the arches in the different phases of construction.

The compass can be made with wood and was designed to be able to be disassembled. it had three sets of beams to make the different arch types with the same tools.

The large two beams (2.10 meters long) were used for the main central arch, the medium beams (1.20 meters long) were used to create the arch for the corridor and the small (0.9 meters long) beams were used for the window, door and corridor openings.

The compass followed a simple mechanism where the two beams could move along a track to achieve the desired curvature for the arch. The beams could be used simultaneously to build the arch from the two sides. Each of the beams had a plate of  0.30m width to place two adjacent bricks, holding the previous one in place as it dries  while the next brick could be placed beside it.

     









 





 



 



 





 













Figure 45.Types of arches

A compass was designed to create the

A compass was des arches in the differe tion. The compass h wood and was des be disassembled. i beams to make types. The large tw for the main centra beams were used to the corridor and th used for the window openings. The co simple mechanism beams could mov achieve the desire arch. The beams co neously to build the

facade section of unit detial













 





 

  



 



  



0

Figure 46. section 1-1

1

facade section of unit detial

 



 



   









      







  





  



 



  

 



0

Figure 47. Section 2-2

1

window placement and design











 





 



Figure 48. Opening options regarding orientation

Type A: Door, meant for privacy and entrance.

Type B: Possible if looking towards the courtyards, if there is protection from other units within the clusters, or the orientation if the room faces north(allow maximum daylight) or south (allow maximum solar radiation in winter)

Type C: Maximum privacy with enough opening size to allow cross ventilation. Rotation to protect from midday and afternoon sun (west).

Type D: Maximum privacy with enough opening size to allow cross ventilation. Rotation to protect from morning sun (east).

bustan app mock-up

   

   

    

    

Figure 51. Bustan App Mock-Up

STEP 04 CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 01.foundation 02.brick making 03.construct arch 04.brick laying 05.Openig 06.entrance making 07.compass making

   

    

       

        

        

08.types of farming BACK

finish

Figure 49. Foundation

STEP 04 CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 01.foundation 02.brick making 03.construct arch 04.brick laying 05.Openig 06.entrance making 07.compass making

            

                         

             

          

08.types of farming BACK

Figure 50. Brick Laying, Wall

finish

     

           

               

       

STEP 04 CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 01.foundation 02.brick making 03.construct arch

                     

     

           

       PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK  STUDENT VERSION    

     

04.brick laying PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

05.Openig 06.entrance making 07.compass making 08.types of farming

      

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

    

         

finish

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

BACK

             

      

Figure 52. Main Arch

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

STEP 04 CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 01.foundation 02.brick making 03.construct arch 04.brick laying 05.Openig                 

   

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

      

06.entrance making 07.compass making 08.types of farming

  

  

      

BACK

       

     

Figure 53. Hall Arch

finish

climate and energy design

OVERALL LOOK VIEW FROM LEX GEBOUW

04 UNITY TOWERS location:

Brussels, Belgium

type:

Academic, MEGA studio

team:

Groupwork: Shasan Chokshi, Javier Montemayor, Toby van Wijngaarden, Amarins Kroes, Pohusn Wu, Stephanie Moumdjian

ROLE:

Building Concept, Climate Design: vertical transport, fire safety design, energy calculations & building physics

level:

2th Semester, Master's Program

date:

2019

supervisor:

Prof. Dr. Regina Bokel

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The project of MEGA challenges the students to design two high-rise towers for the European Union in Brussels, Belgium. The site is located in between the city center and the European Union Commission buildings, giving it a prime position. The plot is 240 x 80 m and should integrate the work of all the disciplines.

The architectural concept works with two main towers that look at each other and create a subtle connection between the two sides of Brussels that seem to be divided now. The project also searches for future flexibility within its use and provides public and open areas around it to enhance the plots value.

This report focuses on the climatic aspects and integration of the building services of the towers, UNITY, to make them feasible taken the people, planet and profit into account.

NORTH

urban comfort radiation ANALYSIS

SHADOW ANALYSIS

Table 4. Total radiance by season on the 11 massing options analysed. (data obtained from grasshopper simulation done by computational designers)

Figure 54. Option 2, winter solar radiation simulation

Figure 57. Option 2, summer solar radiation simulation

Figure 55. Option 3, winter solar radiation simulation

Figure 58. Option 3, summer solar radiation simulation

Total radiance [kWh/m2] Options 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

21-Dec 866 797 930 844 680 730 851 742 817 807 748

21-Jun 3300 3097 3399 3079 2690 2735 3233 2892 3172 3076 2872

Ratio 3,810,624 3,885,822 3,654,839 3,648,104 3,955,882 3,746,575 379,906 3,897,574 3,882,497 3,811,648 3,839,572

Remark Not a correct size angled roof

angled roof

Figure 62. Summer shadow analysis, isometric view

Figure 56. Option 10, winter solar radiation simulation

Figure 59. Option 10, summer solar radiation simulation

Figure 60. Option 4, winter solar radiation simulation

Figure 61. Option 4, summer solar radiation simulation

Figure 63. Winter shadow analysis, isometric view

WIND ANALYSIS Understanding of the wind movement around the site was necessary, so a CFD simulation was done with Phoenics. Three situations had to be looked: seasonal wind effects, and special situations such as possible venturi effects and galloping.

The venturi test was added after the midterm due to a structural judge’s remark on the closeness of the two towers and the influence it could have on the pedestrian comfort if a venturi effect was present. It was also noted to check if a galloping effect was present. For the first two situations, Phoenics simulations were wind velocities and pressures at different heights were looked upon; for the third, some initial parameters were found through research. (For the complete simulations please refer to appendix A) For the simulations the weather data of Brussels was used, this data is obtained at 10 m. from the ground close to the airport.

wind simulations

Figure 64. Predominant wind velocities, isometric view (done with Phoenics)

The predominant winds in March come from the south west and the highest velocities at pedestrian level (1.75 m.) were 11 m/s considered at the streets and open areas surrounding the plot. These velocities were neglected since they appear due to the boundaries of the model used for the simulations. Considering only the context buildings the maximum velocities are between 6-9 m/s.

VENTURI EFFECT

Figure 65. March wind rose

As it was mentioned, the possibility of venturi had to be discarded, since this could represent an important negative effect on the urban comfort of the surrounding context. To search for the presence of this effect, simulations with wind coming from different directions, to see if the vectors would increase in size when in contact with the two high towers, were conducted. It should also be noted that wind coming from the north and north east seldom happens, around less than 5% of hours in august and April, and around 6% of hours from the north east in May, according to the weather data from Brussels. The velocities at pedestrian level were very low, thus the venturi check was done at 60 m. from the lowest point in the plot for a representation of the velocities.

In none of the simulations conducted the venturi effect was found. On the contrary, a decrease on the velocities can be seen due to the two towers being very close together and possibly acting as one.

Higher wind pressures to be checked by structural designers

Figure 66. Wind pressures in march, top view at 1.75 mts. (done with Phoenics)

Should be closed, affects results

Figure 68. March wind rose

Figure 69. May wind rose

Building block reduces velocities on northern neighbour

Figure 67. Wind velocities in march, top view at 1.75 mts. (done with Phoenics)

Figure 70. Wind velocities in March, top view at 60 mts. (done with Phoenics)

Figure 71. Wind velocities in May, top view at 60 mts. (done with Phoenics)

overview of general strategies

The figure to the right shows an overview on the general strategies applied on the building to enhance its performance.

ENERGY PV PANELS

These strategies include: Natural daylight: through proper orientation and an atrium for denser areas at the plinth.

VIEWS VIEWS TO THE CITY

Views to the city: residences towards the city and secret garden offices towards the EU buildings and public parks.

Green areas: green roofs and green areas for water filtering and rainwater mitigation, as well as for better environment. Compact design of the towers as to not use 100% of the site and give back to the city these open green areas. Pedestrian areas are recommended to be light colour with high solar reflective index.

VIEWS VIEWS TO THE PARKS

Rainwater: rainwater collection to further use for the toilets during the year.

INSTALLATIONS TECHNICAL FLOORS

Energy: PV panels on highest roof tops and on optimised facade panels. (nose in balconies for residence tower, one side of the angle on the office tower) Heat pump: the use of a heat pump, whose source is an existing aquifer in the zone.

All the strategies will be explained in detail in their corresponding chapters.

DAYLIGHT ATRIUM AT PLINTH

RAINWATER PURIFICATION & MITIGATION THROUGH GREEN AREAS

HP

HE

HP

SOURCE: AQUIFER

RAINWATER PURIFICATION & STORAGE Figure 72. Climate strategies Overview

1

fresh air requRement OFFICE REQUIREMENTS

Ventilatie-eisen

Volgens het Bouwbesluit is het verplicht om bij een (nieuw) gebouw te zorgen dat er voldoende luchttoevoer plaatsvindt: ‘Een te bouwen bouwwerk heeft een zodanige voorziening voor luchtverversing dat het ontstaan van een voor de gezondheid nadelige kwaliteit van de binnenlucht wordt voorkomen.’ Deze luchttoevoer wordt de basisventilatie genoemd. Basisventilatie is in principe ventilatie die altijd plaatsvindt en niet afhankelijk is van externe factoren. Met basisventilatie wordt frisse lucht het gebouw in gebracht en wordt vervuilde lucht afgevoerd. De eisen in het Bouwbesluit 2012 zijn afhankelijk van de functie die in een gebouw wordt uitgevoerd en het aantal persoon dat zich in een bepaalde ruimte kan bevinden. In de onderstaande tabel staan de nieuwbouweisen volgens het Bouwbesluit 2012.

Providing each zone with the fresh air requirement was a challenge.

At the beginning the main ventilation strategies revolved around natural air ventilation, which would be sufficient in some periods of the year, but not in others, especially in the open offices in one of the towers.

Functie

Ventilatie-eis in dm3/s

Woonfunctie

–1

Bijeenkomstfunctie a. voor kinderopvang

6,5

b. andere bijeenkomstfunctie

4

Celfunctie

For the offices a mixed - mode ventilation was implemented, natural air supply plus mechanical and mechanical exhaust. Alongside the façade designer, roosters at the façade’s module were added to provide natural air inside the office tower. In the case of winter, as it can be seen in the figure below, the air is preheated when entering the interior space as to avoid the decrease in temperature due to this inlet of air. For summer, the preheating system is not necessary, on the contrary, if the air entering the space it too hot, the mechanical system (VRF system) provides additional cooled fresh air if needed in the hotter seasons of the year.

a. cel

12

b. ander verblijfsgebied

6,5

Gezondheidszorgfunctie a. bedfunctie

12

b. ander verblijfsgebied

6,5

Industriefunctie

6,5

Kantoorfunctie

6,5

Logiesfunctie a. in logiesgebouw b. andere logiesfunctie Onderwijsfunctie

12 12 8,5

Sportfunctie

6,5

Winkelfunctie

4

Een verblijfsgebied heeft een voorziening voor luchtverversing met een volgens NEN 1087 bepaalde capaciteit van ten minste 0,9 dm³/s per m² vloeroppervlakte met een minimum van 7 dm³/s.

1

Table 5. Minimum fresh air requirements (data obtained from De waarden in de tabel zijn een minimumeis. Dat wil zeggen dat in ieder geval niet lager dan article “Ventilatiesystemen” dr. Edward Prendergast and deze waarde moet worden geventileerd. Omby de luchtkwaliteit te verhogen kan gekozen worden om met een grotere hoeveelheid te ventileren. Hierdoor zal echter in het stookseizoen ook meer dr.ir.

Peter van den Engel. ) verwarmd moeten worden, wat nadelig is voor het energiegebruik. Het is belangrijk om te realiseren dat als met een veelvoud van de bovengenoemde waarde wordt geventileerd ook

1 van 7 21-3-2014

UNITIZED SYSTEM

UNITIZED SYSTEM

ventilation rooster

Figure 75. Office tower interior render

1. Mineral wool filling in between the modules 2. System of mullions, extruded aluminum. Male-female union type.

ventilation rooster

1. Mineral wool filling in between the modules 2. System of mullions, extruded aluminum. Male-female union type.

a. Rubber sealants

a. Rubber sealants

b. Filling of mineral wool in mullion space

b. Filling of mineral wool in mullion space

3. Steel structure system, based in C-channels

3. Steel structure system, based in C-channels

4. Flat steel stiffener plate below 10 mm

4. Flat steel stiffener plate below 10 mm

5. Insulated laminated glass, double glazing with low E-coating

5. Insulated laminated glass, double glazing with low E-coating

6. Ventilation opening, 1 cm along the module

6. Ventilation opening, 1 cm along the module

7. CRL Crystal Clear EZ- Glaze Glass-Glass Jointing Strips: Varying Angles. Clear Polycarbonate Resin

7. CRL Crystal Clear EZ- Glaze Glass-Glass Jointing Strips: Varying Angles. Clear Polycarbonate Resin

8. PV panel system- Grey thin film cells

8. PV panel system- Grey thin film cells

a. Glass sheet 4mm

a. Glass sheet 4mm

b. PV film interlayer

b. PV film interlayer

c. Back Metallic aluminum sheet

c. Back Metallic aluminum sheet

9. Thermal insulation 80 mm- Mineral wool

9. Thermal insulation 80 mm- Mineral wool a. Steel substructure attached to main steel structure system

a. Steel substructure attached to main steel structure system 10. Mineral fibre ceiling panel, 2 mm thick, inclined

10. Mineral fibre ceiling panel, 2 mm thick, inclined

11. Aluminum interior sheet

11. Aluminum interior sheet

12. Mineral wool insulation

12. Mineral wool insulation

pre-heating

13.

13. Water/vapour membrane

FLOORING

FLOORING

exterior space

mechanical system (VRF) Water/vapour membrane

1. Metallic/wooden profile on edge of slab, for insulation support

1. Metallic/wooden profile on edge of slab, for insulation support

2. Superior finish: Ceramic tiles 600 x 600 format

2. Superior finish: Ceramic tiles 600 x 600 format

3. Core board: Lightweight metallic frame 600 x 600 format

3. Core board: Lightweight metallic frame 600 x 600 format

4. Inferior support: Protective membrane against humidity and fire

4. Inferior support: Protective membrane against humidity and fire

5. Adjustable support system for raised floor

5. Adjustable support system for raised floor

6. Heating system

interior space

7. Mineral wool insulation: 100 mm 8. Concrete topping layer: 50 mm

exterior space

6. Heating system

interior space

7. Mineral wool insulation: 100 mm 8. Concrete topping layer: 50 mm

9. Concrete hollow slab: 200 mm

9. Concrete hollow slab: 200 mm

10. Structural castellated beam

10. Structural castellated beam

MULLION

MULLION

1. Glass support

1. Glass support

2. Split Transom

2. Split Transom

3. Gaskets

3. Gaskets

4. Thermal break ANCHORING

4. Thermal break ANCHORING

1. Steel bracket

1. Steel bracket

2. Halfen channel HTA40/22

2. Halfen channel HTA40/22

3. Halfen bolt Typ 40/22

3. Halfen bolt Typ 40/22

a. Plan washer DIN 125-A M16

a. Plan washer DIN 125-A M16

b. Nut DIN 934 M16

b. Nut DIN 934 M16

4. Adustable bolt, hexagon scree DIN 933

4. Adustable bolt, hexagon scree DIN 933

5. Steel Hook

5. Steel Hook

a. Sealing steam proof

Figure 73. Façade solution for integrating fresh air; winter diagram in office tower(section in collaboration with façade designer, diagram and annotations by author)

a. Sealing steam proof

Figure 74. Façade solution for integrating fresh air, summer diagram in office tower (section in collaboration with façade designer, diagram and annotations by author)

OFFICE REQUIREMENTS For the residences a mixed - mode ventilation type C was implemented, with natural air supply through operable windows and additional ventilation rooster for when windows are closed, and mechanical exhaust. Alongside the façade designer, roosters at the façade’s module were added to provide natural air inside the residential tower. In the case of winter, as it can be seen in the figure below, the air is preheated when entering the interior space as to avoid the decrease in temperature due to this inlet of air. For summer, the preheating system is not necessary. The systems and duct location will be explained in more detail in a later chapter.

Figure 79. Type C System (figure source: https://www.energuide.be/en/ questions-answers/which-ventilationsystems-exist/746/)

Figure 76. Residential tower interior render

RESIDENCES- MAIN FAÇADE: NOSE

RESIDENCES- MAIN FAÇADE: NOSE 1. Anchoring to structural slab/beam

1. Anchoring to structural slab/beam

a. Concrete anchors, 150 mm

a. Concrete anchors, 150 mm

b. I-section fixed to slab by anchors

b. I-section fixed to slab by anchors

c. Nylon plugs

ventilation rooster

2. Thermal insulation 120 mm- Mineral wool 3. Vapour barrier 4. Water barrier, EPDM membrane 5. L-shape plate fixed to structural frame and connected to I-sections, anchoring

c. Nylon plugs

ventilation rooster

3. Vapour barrier 4. Water barrier, EPDM membrane 5. L-shape plate fixed to structural frame and connected to I-sections, anchoring

6. Steel framing system, 80 mm section

6. Steel framing system, 80 mm section

a. PTR section fixed parallel to slab

a. PTR section fixed parallel to slab

b. T-shapes giving angles to the structure, for support of cladding material

b. T-shapes giving angles to the structure, for support of cladding material

7. ACM system extrusions, fixed with bolts to T-shape

7. ACM system extrusions, fixed with bolts to T-shape

8. Adjustable metallic clip

8. Adjustable metallic clip

9. Sigma Hidden Clip Fastener S.32

9. Sigma Hidden Clip Fastener S.32

pre-heating

10. Aluminum sandwich cover plate, light matte coat covering the full nose

10. Aluminum sandwich cover plate, light matte coat covering the full nose

11. PV system, thin-film cells, dark colored

11. PV system, thin-film cells, dark colored

a. Fixed with metallic L-shapes and clips to the main farming system

a. Fixed with metallic L-shapes and clips to the main farming system

12. Ventilation slot connected to the ceiling

exterior space

2. Thermal insulation 120 mm- Mineral wool

13. Ventilation grill

12. Ventilation slot connected to the ceiling

14. Steel stud farming system filled with mineral wool

13. Ventilation grill

15. Acoustic ceiling, mineral fibre and insulated with mineral wool

14. Steel stud farming system filled with mineral wool

16. Exterior glass wall with openable windows, single glazing

interior space

exterior space

17. Sliding glass doors, double glazing with low E-coating

15. Acoustic ceiling, mineral fibre and insulated with mineral wool

interior space

16. Exterior glass wall with openable windows, single glazing 17. Sliding glass doors, double glazing with low E-coating

FLOORING 1. Metallic/wooden profile on edge of slab, for insulation support

FLOORING 1. Metallic/wooden profile on edge of slab, for insulation support

2. Superior finish: Ceramic tiles 600 x 600 format 3. Core board: Lightweight metallic frame 600 x 600 format

2. Superior finish: Ceramic tiles 600 x 600 format

4. Inferior support: Protective membrane against humidity and fire

3. Core board: Lightweight metallic frame 600 x 600 format

5. Adjustable support system for raised floor

4. Inferior support: Protective membrane against humidity and fire

6. Heating system

5. Adjustable support system for raised floor

7. Mineral wool insulation: 100 mm

6. Heating system

8. Concrete topping layer: 50 mm

7. Mineral wool insulation: 100 mm 8. Concrete topping layer: 50 mm

SCALE 1:20

Figure 77. Façade solution for integrating fresh air, winter diagram in residential tower (section in collaboration with façade designer, diagram and annotations by author)

SCALE 1:20

Figure 78. Façade solution for integrating fresh air, summer diagram in residential tower (section in collaboration with façade designer, diagram and annotations by author)

RESIDENTIAL BALCONY PLACEMENT ANALYSIS

WINTER GARDEN INTERIOR GLASS WALL Double glazed sliding doors

North/ East

Wind: Higher velocities Solution: Winter garden

Wind: Permisible velocities Solution: Balcony

Figure 83. Balcony and winter garden position within residential tower.

Permisible velocities for balconies

Figure 80. Wind velocities in march, top view at 60 mts. (done with Phoenics)

WINTER GARDEN

EXTERIOR GLASS WALL Single glazed winINTERIOR GLASS WALL dows Double glazed sliding doors

NOSE

Compiste EXTERIOR GLASS WALLaluminum PV winsystem Single glazed dows

NOSE

NOSE Compiste aluminum PV system

NOSE

South/ West

WINTER GARDEN

APARTMENT

APARTMENT

WINTER GARDEN

Figure 84. Wiinter garden of residential tower, isometric module. (done by faรงade designer)

Permisible velocities for balconies

Figure 81. Wind velocities in june, top view at 60 mts. (done with Phoenics)

Permisible velocities for balconies

Figure 82. Wind velocities in september, top view at 60 mts. (done with Phoenics)

RESIDENTIAL TOWER - DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS

As it was mentioned before, in the residential tower, two different approaches were taken, design builder for checking BREEAM, total Daylight factor and lux in respect with depths and architectural arrangement features.

Ladybug plus Honeybee were used for optimising depth and size of balconies in the tower as to get daylight, avoid overheating in summer and get the most radiation on the noses in the faรงade module for the PV panels (the last element will be explained in the chapter on energy).

Various simulations were done and the resulting values in the balcony and noses depth sizes resulted in the table below. An example of the type of simulation is also shown below. (For more information on this optimisation, please refer to Group 8: Computational design report)

BREEAM Health and Wellbeing Credit HEA 01

The aim of the daylighting credit is to encourage and recognize designs that provide appropriate levels of daylight for building users.

A pass requires that at least 80% of net lettable floor area in occupied spaces is adequately daylit on the working plane height 0.7m above the floor under a uniform CIE overcast design sky.

Results on depth of noses and balconies Balcony Depth mts. a) Average daylight factor is at least 1.5%.

West 1.50 b) A uniformity ratio of at least 0.3 or a minimum point daylight factor of 0.8% (spaces with glazed roofs, such North 1.20 as atria, must achieve a uniformity ratio of at least 0.7 or a minimum point daylight factor of at least 1.4).

East 1.50 Nose Depth mts.

The results below were calculated using the Radiance simulation engine which provides a detailed multi-zone West 0.75 physics-based calculation of illumination levels on the working planes of the building.

East 1.00 South 1.00 A zone is adequately daylit if both the following conditions are met:

Daylighting data

Figure 85. Example of simulations done by computational designer Table 6. Results on depth of C:\Users\yarai\Documents\DesignBuilder for june 21 at different times of the day(refer to their report for noses and balconies (obtained Project file Data\Housing-Simulation-T14.dsb more information) from computational designer Report generation time 6/29/2019 12:16:21 PM optimisation results) Sky model

CIE overcast day (specify illuminance)

Location BRUXELLES NATIONAL For the simulations in design builder certain parameters were established.

The service areas were neglected from the radiance and daylight calculations.

A working plan of 0.70 mts was used, a daylight factor threshold of 1.5% Working plane height (m) 0.700 to asses the living areas. According to the BREEAM Health and Wellbeing credit HEA 01, the design passes. (for Max Grid BREEAM Size (m) report, please refer to appendix). All 0.200 the detailed the apartments had the required minimum DF and the Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) average in the year was above 300 lux. (this simulation can be refered to in the Min Grid Size (m) 0.050 appendix) Daylight factor threshold (%) 1.5*

Figure 86. Illuminance simulation for living spaces of the residentail tower. (done with Design Builder)

* You should check the daylight factor minimum threshold based on the BREEAM requirements of the local region and building type.

Summary Results Total area (m2)

590.572

Total area meeting requirements (m2)

510.8

% area meeting requirements

86.5

BREEAM Health and Wellbeing Credit HEA 01 Status

PASS

Zone South East 4 South East 1 North West 1 South East 3 South East 2 South West 1 South West 2 North East 1 North East 2 North West 2 Total

Eligible zones for daylighting

Table 7. Results on BREEAM analysis (done with Design Builder)

Zone

Block

Floor area (m2)

Min DF (%)

Average Uniformity ratio Daylight Factor (Min / Avg) (%)

South East 4

Block 1

51.758

1.00

0.32

3.1

51.8

South East 1

Block 1

79.813

0.79

0.26

3.0

0.0

North West 1

Block 1

41.352

1.26

0.28

4.5

41.4

South East 3

Block 1

51.758

1.17

0.27

4.4

51.8

South East 2

Block 1

79.654

0.98

0.23

4.3

79.7

Area Adequately Daylit (m2)

Floor Area (m2) 51.758 79.813 41.352 51.758 79.654 46.468 75.974 75.974 46.468 41.352 590.572

Floor Area above Threshold (m2) 35.217 50.689 36.966 43.572 65.133 46.468 75.974 75.974 46.468 29.638 506.101

Floor Area above Threshold (%) 68.04 63.51 89.39 84.18 81.77 100 100 100 100 71.67 85.7

Average Daylight Factor (%) 2.88 2.79 4.24 4.02 4 10.51 8.51 6.39 7.51 3.08 5.37

Minimum Daylight Factor (%) 1 0.79 1.26 1.17 0.98 4.07 2.89 2.92 3.72 1.05 0.79

Maximum Daylight Factor (%) 8.39 8.45 13 12.49 13.31 24.06 24.39 14.47 15.13 8.89 24.39

Uniformity ratio (Min / Avg) 0.35 0.28 0.3 0.29 0.25 0.39 0.34 0.46 0.49 0.34

Uniformity ratio (Min / Max) 0.12 0.09 0.1 0.09 0.07 0.17 0.12 0.2 0.25 0.12

Table 8. Results on radiance grid (obtained from Design Builder)

Min Illuminance 100.38 79.28 126.61 117.44 98.32 407.88 290.05 291.52 371.64 105.26 79.28

Max Illuminance 839.92 846.15 1301.4 1250.45 1333.07 2410.03 2443.4 1446.63 1513.96 890.64 2443.4

acoustics OFFICE TOWER - CONFERENCE ROOMS For the scope of this project, looking into the acoustics in the whole complex would take a lot of time, therefore only the conference rooms were looked upon in more depth, since they require a certain degree of privacy and sound quality. Criteria: -Reverberation Time: recommended between 0.6 and 1 second - Ceiling: absorptive materials (at the perimeters), reflective above table - Avoiding flutter echo or standing wave (back wall acoustically absorptive, NRC at least 0.50) -Sound transmission class: partition walls go all the way to the floor slab, to ensure confidentiality.

A first calculation on the reverberation time inside the room was done (table to the right).

Building Conference Room Design Absorption Coefficients Sα Surface Material Area 500 Hz 1000 Hz 500hZ 1000Hz Ceiling Suspended Gypsum 124 0.05 0.04 6.2 4.96 Wall 1 Painted Gypsum Wallboard 23.1 0.07 0.05 1.617 1.155 Wall 2 6 mm glass pane 58.45 0.1 0.03 5.845 1.7535 Door 6 mm glass pane 7 0.1 0.03 0.7 0.21 Windows Triple glazing (3mm/13mm arg) 88.55 0.1 0.03 8.855 2.6565 6$,17 *2%$,1 */$66 &/,0$7( Floor Carpet 124 0.06 0.15 7.44 18.6 Seated people 40 0.88 0.96 35.2 38.4 a 65.857 67.735 T 1.05441 1.02517 T avg 1.03979 Table 9. Building Conference room base design, reverberation time calculation

6LOHQFH LV VLPSOH Less is more...

Although, it was within the 1 second desired, it could still be better, so some acoustic tiles were added in the ceiling to see if this could make the RT to a better value.

2SWLPLVHG VRXQG LQVXODWLRQ FDQ EH DFKLHYHG E\ FRPELQLQJ WZR SDQHV RI JODVV ZLWK D VRIW PDWHULDO 39%

6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( FRQWDLQV D SO\ LQWHUOD\HU ZLWK D VSHFLDO QRLVH GDPSHQLQJ FRUH SURYLGLQJ H[FHOOHQW DFRXVWLF DWWHQXDWLRQ

Building Conference Room Design Absorption Coefficients Sα Surface Material Area 500 Hz 1000 Hz 500hZ 1000Hz Ceiling Suspended Acoustic tiles 60 0.6 0.7 36 42 7KH $GYDQWDJH" Ceiling Suspended ceiling 64 0.05 0.04 3.2 2.56 7KH SDWHQWHG DFRXVWLF ILOP XVHG LQ Wall 1 Painted Gypsum Wallboard 23.1 0.07 0.05 1.617 1.155 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( DFWV DV D Wall 2 6 mm glass pane 58.45 0.04 0.03 2.338 1.7535 GDPSHQHU SUHYHQWLQJ WKH JODVV SDQHV IURP UHVRQDWLQJ ZLWK HDFK RWKHU DQG Door 6 mm glass pane 7 0.04 0.03 0.28 0.21 HQVXULQJ DQ HYHQ VRXQG LQVXODWLRQ Windows Triple glazing (3mm/13mm arg) 88.55 0.04 0.03 3.542 2.6565 DFURVV WKH HQWLUH IUHTXHQF\ UDQJH Floor Carpet 124 0.06 0.15 7.44 18.6 ,Q DGGLWLRQ WR LWV H[FHOOHQW DFRXVWLF Seated people 40 0.88 0.96 35.2 38.4 SURSHUWLHV 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( DOVR a 89.617 107.335 SURYLGHV SURWHFWLRQ DJDLQVW LQMXU\ T 0.77485 0.64695 DQG WKH KLJKHVW VDIHW\ OHYHOV UHTXLUHG IRU VDIHW\ FULWLFDO DUHDV RYHU KHDG T avg 0.7109 JOD]LQJ EHLQJ RQH VXFK H[DPSOH Table 10. Building Conference room improved design, reverberation time calculation

6LOHQFH ,QWHUOD\HU

It did indeed became better having half of the ceiling working as a

Thesound silence effect absorption.

On the other hand, for the partition of the interior walls towards the open offices and the halls, an acoustics PVB laminated glass is proposed. (SGG Stadip silence 6.4, of 6.4 mm) with Rw of 35 dB. 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( OHYHOV RXW

OFFICE SPACE

SKY GARDEN

SKY GARDEN

Figure 87. Office tower floor plan and uses diagram.

CONFERENCE ROOMS

(DFK EXLOGLQJ FRPSRQHQW KDV LWV RZQ FULWLFDO VRXQG IUHTXHQF\ UHVRQDQW IUHTXHQF\ WKDW ZLOO FDXVH LW WR YLEUDWH VSRQWDQHRXVO\ $Q\ FRPSRQHQW FRQVHTXHQWO\ SURYLGHV (OHPHQWV RI 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( ODPLQWDHG VDIHW\ JODVV LQDGHTXDWH LQVXODWLRQ DJDLQVW QRLVHV Figure 88. Acoustic laminated glass. DW WKLV VSHFLILF IUHTXHQF\ :LWK WZR SDQHV RI JODVV LQ D GRXEOH JOD]HG XQLW Source: https://uk.saint-gobain-buildingWKLV YLEUDWLRQ LV KHLJKWHQHG $OWKRXJK 7KH DGYDQWDJHV RI glass.com/en-gb/glass-acoustic-insulation WKLV HIIHFW FDQ EH UHGXFHG E\ XVLQJ 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( DW D JODQFH SDQHV RI GLIIHUHQW WKLFNQHVVHV LW ‡ ([FHOOHQW OHYHOV RI VRXQG FDQQRW EH SUHYHQWHG HQWLUHO\ LQVXODWLRQ ZLWKRXW WKH QHHG IRU 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( VXSSUHVVHV WKH WKLFN KHDY\ JODVV LQWUXVLRQ RI VRXQG ZDYHV DURXQG WKH ‡ (YHQ VRXQG LQVXODWLRQ DFURVV WKH FULWLFDO IUHTXHQF\ RI WKH JODVV EH LW D HQWLUH IUHTXHQF\ UDQJH VLQJOH SDQH RU D GRXEOH JOD]HG XQLW ‡ 'LVWRUWLRQ IUHH WUDQVSDUHQF\ ,Q D GRXEOH JOD]HG XQLW 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( DFKLHYHV DQ DLUERUQH VRXQG ‡ $OO WKH VDIHW\ DQG

6RXQG ,QVXODWLRQ G%

LQWUXVLYH IUHTXHQFLHV

8.4mm SGG STADIP SILENCE 8mm monolithic glass

6RXQG 3UHVVXUH >G% $ @ 3HUIRUPDQFH RI 6** 67$',3 6,/(1&( LQ D GRXEOH JOD]HG XQLW

SYSTEMS AND INSTALLATIONS OFFICE AREA

MAIN CONCEPT

SERVICE FLOOR

Systems and installations covers all the technical elements that are used for the functioning of the building. This chapter looks into the different options and the advantages and disadvantages of the chosen systems. These will be represented in schematic floor plans and sections to explain how they work within the building, their size and location.

RESIDENTIAL AREA

SERVICE FLOOR

HEATING SYSTEM

SERVICE FLOOR

Heat generation system Heat Pump + Aquifer Heating Type Radiation Floor + Radiatiors Type of radiation floor Velta system Thermal energy distribution Split system with top and bottom distribution Feed temperature 90 °C Velta system allows it Seated Heating Capacity 90 W/m2 Standing Heating Capacity 55 W/m2 Temperature spread 20 K Thermal room output 20 °C 80 W/m2 Table 11. Heating system properties

SERVICE FLOOR

OFFICE AREA SERVICE FLOOR

SERVICE FLOOR

MIXED AREAS

MIXED AREAS SERVICE FLOOR

HP

HP

HP MIXED AREAS OFFICE AREA

HE

RESIDENTIAL AREA

HEAT PUMP Ground source aquifer Shallow open

SERVICE FLOOR RADIANT FLOOR SYSTEM VRF SYSTEM

Figure 89. HVAC systems schematic section diagram.

water management and savings main plaza - plinth

TOPOGRAPHY NATURAL SLOPE 73 MTS

Months January February March April May June July August September October November December

Rain fall (mm) 57.7 52 51.1 38.8 44.2 55.2 62.3 56.1 50.2 53.1 56 62.2

Roof Gardens water (m3) PV flat roof 105.1 136.8 94.7 123.3 93.1 121.1 70.7 92.0 80.5 104.8 100.6 130.8 113.5 147.7 102.2 133.0 91.5 119.0 96.8 125.9 102.0 132.7 113.3 147.4

Vegetated area 72.6 65.4 64.3 48.8 55.6 69.5 78.4 70.6 63.2 66.8 70.5 78.3

Roads and Pathways 41.6 37.5 36.9 28.0 31.9 39.8 44.9 40.5 36.2 38.3 40.4 44.9

Total Monthly collected Water 356.1 320.9 315.4 239.5 272.8 340.7 384.5 346.2 309.8 327.7 345.6 383.9

Maximum Tank /Storage Size potential (m3) Table 12. Rainwater collection tank potential calculations

RAINWATER PURIFICATION & MITIGATION THROUGH GREEN AREAS

Total Collected Rain Water with evaoration losses (90%) 320.5 288.8 283.8 215.5 245.5 306.6 346.1 311.6 278.8 295.0 311.1 345.5 346.1

61 MTS

Figure 90. Rain water trewatment schematic diagram

RAINWATER PURIFICATION & STORAGE

Figure 91. Formula and data used for rain water collection calculations.

Source: DIN 1989-1:2001-10

energy consumption energy demand Office Energy Demand 4%

3%

4%

Residences Energy Demand 9%

2%

19% heating electricity kWh

heating electricity kWh cooling electricity kWh

22%

5%

DHW kWh 35% 52%

cooling electricity kWh DHW kWh Lighting kWh

Lighting kWh Room Electricity kWh

13%

Room Electricity kWh Ventilator Electricity kWh

Ventilator Electricity kWh

32%

Figure 92. Office energy demand, pie chart

Figure 93. Residences energy demand, pie chart

Total energy Input

Residential Totals Calculation Offices Totals Calculation

floor area m2

number of floors

occupied floor area m2

Total occupied floor area m2

unoccupied floor area m2

Total unoccupied floor area m2

heating electricity kWh

cooling electricity kWh

DHW kWh

Lighting kWh

Room Electricity kWh

Ventilator Electricity kWh

Total Energy Input kWh

24825

25

648

16200

345

8625

18650 93250

9762 24405

5226.3 65328.75

6438 160950

4395.6 109890

/ 44685

498508.75

47420

36

737

26532

662

23832

6537 44315.1594

16736 56727.74267

1604.12 27186.33681

13488.8 457211.5054

20318.4 688705.1665

/ 49248

1323393.91

Total Energy Input + 5% S kWh 523434.1875

1389563.606 1912997.794 kWh

Table 13. Total energy input of both towere, claculation results

Figure 94. Design builder model for energy simulations - Residential tower

Figure 95. Design builder model for energy simulations - Office tower

energy generation energy production and savings Office Tower 4.6%

The roof top area though a bit limited in surface can be used to offset some energy demand from the complex.

The façade design was also optimized in way that both towers can integrate energy generation. The amount of area and the location of those PV panels was provided by the Computational designers. The rooftop potential was calculated before with the radiation analysis in previous chapters. The total rooftop area each tower has is 900 m2 but only 75% of this total was used for maintenance reasons. The efficiency of the panels taken was 14% for the whole system, data taken by “Vuistregels klimaatontwerp versie 20-05-2019”. Still losses were also considered in the calculation such as: inverter losses, temperature, shading, to dust or snow, etc. (For more information on the exact calculations please refer to the appendix)

95.4% Generated on plot

Total Demand left

Residential Tower

32.3%

Roof Towers Office 700 Residential 700

Panel yield 14%

91819 kWh/an 67.7%

14%

Roof Plinth PV areas Office 400 1109 580 1659 Residential 1068 1678

Total

91819 kWh/an Generated on plot

14% 14% 7% 7%

52468.1 0 0 0 52468.1

kWh/an kWh/an kWh/an kWh/an kWh/an

Southwest Southwest North East North East

14% 7%

0 0 0

kWh/an kWh/an kWh/an

Southwest North

Total Demand left

Table 14. Energy generated with PVs at rooftops Type

Unit

Office PV yield Residence PV yield

m2 kWh/ annual m2 kWh/ annual

14%

14%

South West m2 2089.8 234869.7 558.36 62736.9

South East m2 4979.2 793078 837.12 109789.5

5% Facade North West m2 2400.3 112431.7 805.72 37711.5

4% North East m2 2476.8 92793.6 * *

PV Totals

1233172.981 210237.8284

Table 15. Energy generated with PVs at façade The with the PV panels implemented it is possible to account for 87.8% of the total energy demand of the towers.

Further calculations and /or additional PV panels could be implemented in the other available rooftops at is shown on the table, where there is potential but were not added to the project since additional green roof area was preferred for the views and quality of the plot to be respected. Additional energy savings can be done through proper electrical equipment, machinery and water pumping systems. (This would still need to be further researched)

Figure 96. PV panels location, pie charts with energy generated vs demand

Total Energy Demand kWh Residence 523434.19 Office 1389563.61 Complete Towers 1912997.79

Roof Towers PV Roof Plinth PV Facade Pvs kWh/annual kWh/annual kWh/annual

Total E generated

% of total energy

91819.19

52468.10637

210237.8284

354525.12

67.7

91819.19

0

1233172.981

1324992.17

95.4

183638.37

52468.10637

1443410.81

1679517.29

87.8

*Only on the towers

Table 16. Energy generated vs Energy demand

THANKS

05 BUCKY LAB ILUMINATE ME! location:

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

type:

Academic, Master's Program

team:

Groupwork: Javier Montemayor, Aviva Opsomer, Sasha Rodriguez

ROLE:

Project management, material and building physics

level:

1st Semester

date:

2018

supervisor:

Prof. Dr. Marcel Bilow

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This year the AMC - Academic Medical Center Amsterdam asked

TU Delft students to help them improve their building. The building was founded in 1983, making it one of the biggest hospitals in the Netherlands.

This classical building not only serves as a hospital, but also as a university and a research facility. The Building Technology group was asked to propose a new innovative facade concept that would take into consideration one of the following aspects: - Energy - creating or saving energy (hot water, electricity ) - Solar shading - passive or active protection.

- Circularity – can we reuse the façade later?

- Low maintenance – easy to clean, replace or upgrade - Adaptability - Can the façade adapt to the seasons / climate change?

“ WE AIM TO CAPTURE UNUSED DAYLIGHT FROM THE OPAQUE PARTS OF THE FACADE TO BRIGHTEN UP THE ZONES WITH INSUFFICIENT DAYLIGHT “

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 1

PROBLEM STATEMENT

DETAILS

1

2

A103

3 200 mm

2% 1% 3%

Level 5

Level 5

11960 mm

11960 mm

1500 mm

1500 mm

50%

200 mm

200 mm

700 mm

1255 mm

3000 mm

12%

250 mm

Pivoting Panel 25°

8% lighting heating fans cooling humidification hot tap water summer confort

200 mm

250 mm

3 A107

7° 37.8

25% 1

1

Pivoting Panel 25°

A103

3

Level 4

700 mm

Level 4 9460 mm

9460 mm

Level 4

700 mm

A107

800 mm

3

0

25

51 mm

2

5a

50 mm

A107

3a Fixed panel

Level 3

Level 3

6200 mm

6200 mm

8

1

6/7

30

50 m m

3°

4

9 148.

5b

8

mm

mm

3b

0 40

ø 75

mm

50 mm 9

9° .8 39

50

mm

228 mm

34

9

4

3a

5a

mm

9

1. Chain 2. Gear mechanism 3a. Pivoting Panel 25° - Polished 3b. Fixed Panel - Matte 4. Panel - Bar Clamp 5a. Rotating Steel Bar 2 5b. Fixed Steel Bar 6. Slotted Hole Bolted Connection 7. L-Shaped Support Bracket 200 mm 200 mm 250 mm 8. Lightweight Aluminum Frame 9. Existing AMC Facade 10. Roller bearing

0 40

2

800 mm

39

10

4

2105 mm

14

Winter

1100 mm

Summer

General Axonometric

1

1

Pivoting Panel 25°

A101

Panel

9460 mm

Existing AMC Facade

CHART 1: Proportion of total primary energy consumption of the AMC

ANGLE CALCULATION PER SEASON

Automated Motor

51 mm

700 mm

50 mm

m ø 75

1. Belt 2. Pulley Mechanism 3a. Pivoting Panel 25” - Polished 3b. Fixed Panel - Matte 4. Panel - Bar Clamp 5a. Rotating Steel Bar 5b. Fixed Steel m 0m 0Connection 2 6. Slotted Hole Bolted ø 7. L-Shaped Suppot Bracket 8. Lightweight Aluminun Frame 9. Existing AMC Facade

ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT

06 CINT - NANOTECHNOLOGY

AND INVESTIGATION CENTRE

location:

Monterrey, Nuevo León, México

type:

Academic, End of Studies project

team:

Groupwork Claudia Ledezma

ROLE:

Building Concept, Structural Details and Landscape Design

level:

10th Semester

date:

May 2014

supervisor:

Prof.Teresa María de la Garza teredelagarza@itesm.mx Prof. Carlos Estrada Zubia carlos.estrada@itesm.mx

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The project consisted in the renovation of a conflicted urban area, the recreation of a plaza inside the main campus and a Nanotechnology building for the University. The first three months were dedicated soley to the urban investigation and the environmental repercutions on the site.

Afterwards the masterplan was developed in groups of two, from which we found the main pedestrian flows and students concerns regarding the main plaza. The concept was thus developed to respect the pedestrian and the image the campus already had with its other buildings creating different ambients and areas for rest that converse with the two Nanothecnology buildings. Vegetation was respected and the existing basement was remodelated.

environmental analysis

FLORAL SPECIES

FLORAL SPECIES IN RISK

HYDROLOGIC STUDY

PEDESTRIAN FLOW AND MAIN ACCESS POINTS

0

actual condition

masterplan

LANDSCAPE sTRATEGIES

10

20 m

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT PROFILE

DESIGN PROCESS

1

Required Area

2

0

5

10

20

Divided for natural light and ventilation

FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 TYPOLOGY

FLOOR PLAN - GROUND FLOOR





CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y NANOTECNOOLOGÍA

CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y NANOTECNOOLOGÍA





NPT +0.00

3.35





12.00

63.35 12.00

12.00



 12.00







NOTAS: -Dimensiones en metros -Las cotas rigen al proyecto.

-Cerramiento 2.20 m

NPT +0.00

3.35





12.00

63.35 12.00

12.00



 12.00

 12.00

NOMENCLATURA:

NPT NIVEL DE PISO TERMINADO NJ NIVEL DE JARDIN

12.00

NOMENCLATURA:

NPT NIVEL DE PISO TERMINADO NJ NIVEL DE JARDIN

SIMBOLOGÍA:

11.40

11.40

CAFETERÍA



NPT +-2.38

NPT -1.22

NPT +0.61

NPT +-2.38

COCINA

LAB-GENERAL

NPT -1.75

NPT -1.22

11.40

NPT -1.75

MAQ.

MAQ.

NPT +1.20

11.40

ADMIN

 ADMIN



NPT +1.20

INST



SIMBOLOGÍA:

INST



3

NOTAS: -Dimensiones en metros -Las cotas rigen al proyecto.

-Cerramiento 2.20 m

COCINA

LAB-GENERAL

CAFETERÍA



NPT +0.61

Open to plaza and respect pedestrian flow



NPT +0.00



NPT +0.45

NPT +0.00

NPT +0.45

INST

 NPT +0.00



ÁREA DE ESTUDIO

8.40 ÁREA DE ESTAR



3.30



12.00



12.00



12.00



NPT -4.00

MAQ

NPT -0.65

12.00

75.30

NPT +0.00 ÁREA DE ESTUDIO



3.30

12.00

12.00

12.00

12.00





NPT -4.00

MAQ

NPT -0.65





 

ÁREA DE ESTAR



NJ -4.10

12.00



OFICINA DE MAESTROS

8.40

8.40

OFICINA DE MAESTROS NPT +0.00

4

8.40

INST



NPT +0.00

35.40

NPT +0.00

15.60

15.60

NPT +0.00

35.40

NPT +0.00

15.60

15.60

NPT +0.00

PLANTAS ARQUITECTÓNICAS EXPLANADA







12.00

75.30



NJ -4.10

12.00





PLANTAS ARQUITECTÓNICAS EXPLANADA

1 : 250

1 : 250

A-100 A-100

L4 - Green Technologies L3 - Bioprocess and Synthetic Biology L2 - Nutriomic and Emerging Technologies L1 - Public Areas B1 - Nanothecnology Labs

12.00



L5 - Energy Center

B2 - Nanothecnology Labs Program Distribution

PROJECT DETAILING

CROSS SECTION

0

FLOOR PLAN - BASEMENT 



3.35

5

10 m



Zinco Elefeet

CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y NANOTECNOOLOGÍA

NPT +0.00





12.00

63.35 12.00

12.00



 12.00

Tempered Glass Securcid

NOTAS: -Dimensiones en metros -Las cotas rigen al proyecto.

-Cerramiento 2.20 m



0.50

12.00

0.50

Industrial Epoxy Floor

Strainer

0.28

Filling

NOMENCLATURA:

NPT NIVEL DE PISO TERMINADO NJ NIVEL DE JARDIN

2%

EXPLANADA

Lightweight concrete slab 0.40m

SIMBOLOGÍA:

INST

 NPT -1.75

MAQ.

11.40

11.40

NPT +-2.38

COCINA

LAB-GENERAL

CAFETERÍA



NPT -1.22

NPT +0.61

A1

0.50

ADMIN

NPT +1.20

0.78



Plaster panel Drywall de 1/2" supported by metalic frame

Grout



INST



NPT +0.00

ÁREA DE ESTUDIO

ÁREA DE ESTAR

3.30



12.00



12.00



12.00



NPT -4.00

MAQ

NPT -0.65

12.00

75.30



Cobbled Float Floor

2%

2%

NPT N4 +17.00

Rain Fill

NJ -4.10

12.00



Floradrain



Zinco Elefeet

Strainer

Gravel 5 cm Filter

8.40

8.40

OFICINA DE MAESTROS NPT +0.00



Substratum 25 cm



0.30

NPT +0.00

NPT +0.45

35.40

NPT +0.00

15.60

15.60

NPT +0.00

12.00





PLANTAS ARQUITECTÓNICAS EXPLANADA

1 : 250

A-100

0

0.5

1m

DETAILING

FACADE SECTION

STRUCTURAL CONCEPT

1

NPT N2 +9.00

Profile C.P.S 8"x 2.34" aceromex

2

Brick Wall + Gypsum Panel 0.30 m Duovent Glass 6 mm tintex light blue

3

P-03

Profile C.P.S 8"x 2.34" aceromex

NPT N1 +5.00

Reinforced Concrete Columns Duovent Glass 6 mm tintex light blue

1 Greenhouse Cover 2 Vertical Greenhouse 3 Greenhouse attached structure EXPLANADA

LABORATORY FACADE SECTON

BRIDGE STRUCTURAL DETAILS

LABORATORY FACADE DETAIL D-04

1.20

Industrial Epoxy Floor

Tensed Cable 6 mm @0.15m

Relleno

Steel Sill 1/2" x 2" aceromex NPT N2 +9.00

0.30 0.10

NPT N2 +9

NPT N2 +9.00

Profile C.P.S 8"x2.34" aceromex

NPT N2 +9.00

Profile C.P.S 8"x 2.34" aceromex D-03

NPT ZAPA S13-4.00 -1.7

Thermal Isolation

D-02

Lightweight concrete slab

Lightweight concrete slab

Lightweight concrete slab 0.40m

Grout

Brick Wall + Gypsum panel 0.30 m Reinforced Concrete Columns

D-01

FRONTAL VIEW

Air Cavity 0.05 m Permabase panel 12.7 mm

Steel plate 1/2" aceromex

Fiber glass wool 0.10 m

Duovent Glass 6 mm tintex light blue

Post

Steel Profile Enclosure

3.70

Gypsum panel 12.7 mm Steel Plate 1/2" aceromex

Duovent Glass 6mm tintex light blue

Structural Support CHS-Hollow Circular Section

0

0.1

0.3 m

Railing with Tensed Cables

Structural Profile W Bridge Support

NPT N1 +5.00

NPT N2 +9.00

Steel plate welded to structural profile

0.30

Steel Anchor to Concrete slab

ZAPA 3 -5.5 Joint 0.01 m Brick Maya 0.128x0.28

0 Structural Support CHS - Screwed Hollow Circular Section

SECTION VIEW

0

0

0.5

2m

2

0.5

2m

0.5

2m

P O R TA F O L I O

+52 1 8110200980 ya r a i m a r i a m @ g m a i l . c o m M s c . i r .Y A R A I Z E N T E N O