46
January 2011
www.intrafish.com
Q&A
Zoila Bustamante CONAPACH - Chilean National Confederation of Artisanal Fishermen Ian Emmett FNI: Can you describe how extensive CONAPACH’s membership is? ZB: There are now 400 organisations under the CONAPACH umbrella, meaning 80-90% of the total. When taking into account the jobs dependent on fishing - transport, distribution chain, producers, etc, we are talking about 300,000 jobs in all within the artisanal sector. Artisanal boats are those under 18m overall catching pelagic, demersal and benthonic species. Over the years, the confederation has gained some political sway and has managed to make itself heard to the extent that it is always present at Congress when legislation is being debated, regardless of if we are invited or not. Over the past three years, four new items of legislation incorporated proposals were tabled by CONAPACH. One of these included in the Aquaculture Law helps to avoid further contamination, in the 10th Region (south), from the salmon plants installed in interior waters. Despite this law governing the aquaculture sector, the government is obliged by law to invite CONAPACH, which was able to contribute. FNI: Can you outline some of the conflicts for the artisanal fleet? ZB: Salmon aquaculture is a source of ongoing conflict for the artisanal fleet in Chile, not only because of the space that it takes up but also due to the contamination it produces that affects fisheries. Article 47 in the Fisheries Law
President: Zoila Bustamante at CONAPACH’s Valparaíso
The history of CONAPACH (Confederación Nacional de Pescadores Artesanales de Chile) has its roots in the early days of trade unions in the 1920s, materialising as FENAPACH in the early 1970s, becoming CONAPACH in 1980 as an organisation designed to stand up for the rights of its members. The current President, Zoila Bustamante, heads this confederation of 78,000 members who are entitled to quotas. When more peripheral members such as the scuba and apnea divers as well as the seaweed collectors are included, this figure rises to a membership of 120,000.
stipulates that the first 5 miles from the coastline and the interior waters are reserved for the artisanal fleet, but now the 5-mile limit is being invaded by the industrial fleet and the interior waters are being occupied by the salmon farms as well being contaminated by the thermoelectric plants, all producing waste products that are suffocating the sea.
We cannot accept having thermoelectric plants set up along our coastline as they suck up millions of litres of water containing plankton and microfauna. All these organisms die when discharged back into the sea because the water is returned at 24ºC. Since the thermoelectric plants are coal-fired, they also contaminate the surrounding land and air. The cellulose manufacturing plants along the coast are another blight that we suffer from. I say blight because many people choose to ignore what is being destroyed and only see a source of employment, as long as they can earn money. It doesn’t matter what resources are being destroyed, and the jobs that are lost as a result. A prime example of this is the Arauco cellulose manufacturer determined to set up a plant with a waste outlet to the sea, in the Bay of Mehuín. We’ve been fighting against this for 13 years with a huge conglomerate in conjunction with the Committee for the Defence of the Sea. The seaboard town of Constitución, in the Maule Region, severely hit by the tsunami and the earthquake, has a large cellulose plant pumping its waste into the sea. But there are no protests as it employs a large number of locals. FNI: So what about the technical reports that the cellulose manufacturers have to present? ZB: This is one of
the government mistakes that goes back many years now. As far as us artisanal fishermen are concerned, what we can’t get our head round is the fact that if a company pays somebody to do a study then, obviously, the result is not going to go against that company and so the person drafting the report would not get paid. [Sernapesca, the Chilean National Fisheries Department, receives these reports]. The same happens in the salmon industry, which is why we lobbied so that the government would fund these scientific reports. The government is currently looking into ways for Sernapesca to finance these reports. FNI: The Chilean fishing industry lacks a ministry. Is there any lobbying going on in this area? ZB: Despite Chile’s 6,435 km of coastline, foreign ships operating in international waters, and industrial and artisanal fleet and the constant need for surveillance, the industry has no fisheries ministry. The national coastal fisheries are divided up into regions, and when boats from one region illegally invade another, the only way that Sernapesca is able to respond is to call up the navy to send a patrol boat, by which time the illegal catch has been landed and distributed. Sporadic road controls are occasionally set up to catch the distributors but not the fishermen.
“Whenever there’s a problem in our sector, there is talk about ‘reconversion’ – in reality this means turning fishermen into shoe repairers or barbers” The fishing industry in general is under the Ministry of Economy and Tourism. I remember as if it were yesterday how the recently elected President of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, stated that he was going to boost tourism. But at the expenses of what? Of artisanal fishing becoming a mere tourist attraction, with fishermen taking tourists out on – they call it ‘reconversion’. Whenever there’s a problem in our sector, there is talk about reconversion, meaning turning fishermen into shoe repairers or barbers. Talks were held