Improving Effective Coverage in Health

Page 163

P erformance - B ased F inancing I mproves C overage

In addition, there is evidence from several LMICs that PBF can be an effective strategy in terms of its impacts on health service utilization. As shown by evidence from Burundi (Falisse et al. 2014), Nigeria (Khanna et al. 2021), Rwanda (Basinga et al. 2011), Zambia (Friedman et al. 2016), and Zimbabwe (Friedman, Das, and Mutasa 2017), PBF appears to be particularly successful at increasing the rate of institutional deliveries or deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants. Some studies, notably two in Argentina (Gertler, Giovagnoli, and Martinez 2014; Celhay et al. 2019), also find increases in ANC utilization, while a few others report impacts on immunization of the mother or child (Argentina, Cameroon, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Zambia). The impact evaluation of Plan Nacer in Argentina (box 5.1) demonstrates impacts on health outcomes such as low birth weight and neonatal mortality. Despite some heterogeneity in the results,

Box 5.1 In Focus: A middle-income country’s experience with performance-based financing: The case of Argentina and Plan Nacer and Programa Sumar The 2001 economic crisis plunged more than half of Argentina’s population into poverty and resulted in high unemployment (Fiszbein, Giovagnoli, and Adúrez 2003). Many Argentines lost their health coverage and turned to the public health system for care. The increased demand strained the s­ ystem’s capacity to deliver services, and basic health indicators deteriorated. Between 2000 and 2002, Argentina’s infant mortality rate increased from 16.6 to 16.8 per 1,000, and in the country’s poorer northeastern and northwestern provinces, infant mortality was as high as 25 per 1,000 (Cortez and Romero 2013). As a result, the government of Argentina developed Plan Nacer to reduce infant mortality by increasing access to health care to uninsured pregnant women and children under age six, and to improve the efficiency and quality of the public health system by i nt ro duc i n g c h a n g e s i n t he i nc e nt i ve framework. Plan Nacer’s performance-based financing (PBF) mechanisms created two levels of

incentives: one between the national and provincial governments, and the other between the provincial governments and health facilities. Provincial governments received capitation payments from the National Ministry of Health based on the number of beneficiaries enrolled in Plan Nacer, and on the achievement of specified health indicator ­targets. Health facilities received fee-for-service payments from the provincial government a­ ccording to the number and quality of services they provided (Cortez 2009). The health facilities benefitted from substantial autonomy in deciding how to use the PBF incentives. Some paid bonuses to health workers, while others reinvested in the ­facility to make improvements in infrastructure and service delivery (Heard 2012). The government launched phase I of Plan Nacer in nine of Argentina’s poorest provinces in 2005 and brought the program to the 14 remaining provinces and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires in phase II in 2007. (Continued)

109


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

2min
pages 288-291

Building a forward-looking research agenda

1min
page 287

strategic purchasing

2min
page 286

Message 2: Support the four facility financing tenets Message 3: Understand PBF incentives in a broader health

5min
pages 281-283

Message 1: Recognize that sustainability is about more than just money

3min
pages 279-280

at the clinic

10min
pages 258-262

antenatal care

5min
pages 263-265

Conclusion

2min
page 269

PBF as a health system reform

6min
pages 266-268

7.3 Efficiency of effective coverage provision

7min
pages 254-257

coverage tree

5min
pages 250-252

financial incentives

3min
pages 248-249

Introduction Provision of nonindicated treatment in the context of

1min
page 247

6A.2 PBF and DFF interventions, by country, in the five countries in the pooled analysis of PBF versus DFF (Cameroon, Nigeria, Rwanda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe): Comparison of alternative financing approaches

10min
pages 229-236

Results from the meta-analysis

2min
page 213

PBF, DFF, and baseline effort

4min
pages 210-211

PBF, DFF, and institutional deliveries

2min
page 208

Discussion and conclusions

7min
pages 217-220

6.7 In Focus: PBF and equity

2min
page 206

consultations in Cameroon and Nigeria B6.7.1 Patient socioeconomic status, PBF, DFF, and know-can-do gaps

1min
page 205

6.2 Description of the PBF and DFF arms in Nigeria

1min
page 203

6.1 Geographic coverage of studies included in the meta-analysis

1min
page 195

interventions

3min
pages 189-190

6.1 Inclusion criteria for the systematic review and meta-analysis

4min
pages 191-192

preventive screening for noncommunicable diseases in Armenia

2min
page 188

Systematic review and meta-analysis of demand- and supply-side financial incentives

1min
page 187

6.1 In Focus: Kyrgyz Republic PBF pilot

2min
page 186

Introduction

1min
page 185

Conclusions

1min
page 178

know-can-do gap—in Cameroon and Nigeria

1min
page 177

5.3 In Focus: Measurement of worker motivation and satisfaction

2min
page 170

Results

1min
page 171

PBF, quality of care, and idle capacity

1min
page 176

paying for performance

6min
pages 167-169

six countries

1min
page 166

performance-based financing: The case of Argentina and Plan Nacer and Programa Sumar

6min
pages 163-165

Cameroon and Nigeria

1min
page 162

PBF, health system performance, and health worker effort in theory

1min
page 155

Evidence of the impact of PBF on the quality and quantity of health service delivery in LMICs Impact of PBF on health worker motivation and satisfaction in

2min
page 161

Introduction

7min
pages 151-154

health: An illustration

8min
pages 156-160

References

7min
pages 146-150

4A.3 Correlates of the know-can-do gap

2min
pages 137-138

Conclusions

6min
pages 132-134

4.2 In Focus: Does discrimination contribute to poor effort?

2min
page 130

of care

2min
page 123

countries

3min
pages 127-128

Why antenatal care?

1min
page 113

Results

3min
pages 117-118

Introduction

1min
page 111

Conclusions

1min
page 103

Mali case study

6min
pages 98-100

and maternal care

3min
page 97

Conclusions

1min
page 86

3.1 Summarizing the three gaps

1min
page 94

Theoretical framework for assessing quality of care

6min
pages 91-93

Introduction

3min
pages 89-90

effective coverage

1min
page 85

coverage and quality

1min
page 71

Empirical applications Expanding the work on effective coverage by using data collected in

1min
page 73

1 In Focus: Combining technological innovations to facilitate

2min
page 62

medical conditions

1min
page 74

References

4min
pages 64-66

Conclusions

1min
page 63

2.2 Coverage, quality, effective coverage, and the care cascade

1min
page 69

Introduction

1min
page 67
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.