Walking the Talk

Page 218

WALKING THE TALK

purchasing to facilitate team-based care models and incentivize care coordination and quality. (See chapter 4.) 7. Create an accountability framework that links resources to results. Resource mobilization (whether through additional allocations or reprioritization) tends to be more successful when accompanied by a strong accountability framework built on interoperable data platforms. Reliable and transparent measurement of PHC financing, which has been a weak link in many countries, will be critical to hold providers accountable to health system investors—including international and domestic funders and, most importantly, a country’s citizens. Results need to be regularly monitored and the accountability framework itself adjusted to changing circumstances and priorities, including emergencies. 8. Explore value-based purchasing. Countries can leverage this approach to promote multidisciplinary teamwork, encourage collaboration across sectors, and incentivize better care quality and coverage. Patients’ voices should be heard when provider payment mechanisms are being designed, thereby empowering health service users to participate in decision-­making. Development partners may support countries to build measurement and monitoring capacity, enhance data platforms, and pilot and incubate innovations to improve accountability in PHC financing.

Recommendations for donors and the international health community 1. Support documentation, evaluation, and learning on country experiences with multidisciplinary team-based care. Despite a consensus favoring team-based care models for PHC, the literature still offers few practical examples and detailed evaluations to guide team design. Donors and the wider international community can enable countries’ reform strategies by supporting systematic documentation, evaluation, and learning around different team-based care models, including transition processes. Donors could finance evaluations or reviews of specific country experiences; they could also support a community of practice for practitioners and policy makers at different stages in the reform process. In the long run, building on a growing donor-supported evidence base, international norm-setting bodies can establish standards and guidelines for PHC care teams—including the size, composition, and catchment population—that are tailored to local contexts and resource constraints. 2. Support country-led digital integration. In each country, donors can provide financial and technical support to integrate fragmented health data 194


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Walking the Talk by World Bank Publications - Issuu