Walking the Talk

Page 176

WALKING THE TALK

primary care.17 Such dual programs will eventually be more widely offered in other countries and to other health professionals. A fundamental concern is to customize them to local needs and ensure their accessibility and relevance to people who work in PHC or who aspire to do so. Available tools include tuition support, options for on-the-job and on-line degree acquisition, and tangible benefits in compensation and career advancement. ++

Last and perhaps most important, countries need to build capacities for multisectoral stewardship at the highest policy level. This first involves understanding the training and other requirements for doing so effectively, a question that remains unresolved, despite recurrent efforts in many countries with varied approaches and uneven results. Top-level multisectoral stewardship also needs to be mirrored through the successive levels of the health system down to the local administrative level and the PHC front lines. Relevant skills—including intersectoral dialogue, advocacy, and communication—must be embedded within health worker training curricula.

The current context may provide an opportunity to launch ambitious reforms in this respect. Along with the global systemic disruption caused by COVID19, the era of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is one in which the complex interplay between health and development progress in other sectors has again come to the fore. There is growing acknowledgment of how action in other sectors influences health, and now there is an acute awareness that what happens in health can swiftly and overwhelmingly affect countries’ economic performance and every other part of life (Bennett et al. 2020; ­Hussain et al. 2020).

Financing multisectoral engagement Valuing multisectoral benefits in resource allocation

152

The case for multisectoral action to strengthen PHC is clear. Only through multisectoral action can the PHC platform cohesively target the social determinants of health across sectors like education, nutrition, agriculture, housing, transport, and environment (Anaf et al. 2014; Public Health Agency of Canada 2007; Public Health Agency of Canada and WHO 2008). Capitalizing on the synergies across health and other sectors, however, will require governments to use new ways of promoting and financing win-win measures that can spur progress on multiple development goals at once (Marmot et al. 2008). A growing body of literature on frameworks can be used to guide governments


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Walking the Talk by World Bank Publications - Issuu