Walking the Talk

Page 158

WALKING THE TALK

initiatives will likely remain disease specific, funding arrangements at the country level should not duplicate processes across specific programs. A further shift to financing systems rather than programs can lead to cross-programmatic efficiency gains and savings within primary health care (Sparkes, Durán, and Kutzin 2017). Donors can also contribute to more resilient health systems by investing in surveillance and public health functions. The Global Action Plan Financing Accelerator highlights several critical features of a next generation of development assistance for health (DAH) (Yazbeck et al. 2020), including enhanced support for fiscal, public financial management, and efficiency reforms, as well as advocacy platforms. The COVID-19 epidemic has already forced donors to become more flexible, for example, by allowing reallocations of their investments to address the COVID-19 response, granting flexibilities in donor policies, and looking for opportunities to build on existing programmatic infrastructure to address COVID-19 and protect essential services. For example, in LMICs, Gavi has invested heavily in cold chain infrastructure; the cold chain can be used for diagnostic testing and delivery of COVID-19 vaccines. The alignment of donor financing and concessional lending behind government reforms can strengthen the infrastructure and institutions needed for stronger PHC systems. For example, in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, the government’s Health Sector Reform Strategy (HSRS) focuses on building a people-centered health system that provides equitable access to a prioritized set of essential health services, backed by increases in domestic financing and delivered through an improved service delivery model that includes strengthening the integrated outreach model for the most remote populations. The World Bank’s Health and Nutrition Services Access Project (HANSA) is designed to strengthen subnational financing, governance, and service delivery at the PHC level. It serves as a platform for the alignment of development partners in support of sustainable financing for UHC, whereby the Global Fund and Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade provide joint financing of US$36 million through mainstreamed government systems (World Bank 2017b).

From fragmentation to people-centered integration Paying providers for care coordination and integration

134

Traditional fee-for-service (FFS), line-item budgets, or capitation on its own are increasingly seen as poorly aligned with team-based, integrated care models (table 4.3) (OECD 2016a). Many countries have adopted financing


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.