Walking the Talk

Page 151

CHAPTER 4: MAKING IT HAPPEN

countries to some US$380 billion annually (Stenberg et al. 2019). These are averages and estimates: each country must identify its own locally relevant PHC policies, define a locally appropriate benefits package, and assess the costs and budgetary implications of its delivery. For the large majority of countries, a strong case can be made that these investments would pay large dividends—by improving population health (OECD 2020a), advancing economic inclusion, and improving countries’ competitiveness. The source of PHC resources has important implications for whether investment needs will be met. Universal coverage of high quality, comprehensive PHC first requires mobilizing adequate revenues for health overall through prepaid, pooled financing that eliminates out-of-pocket expenditures. Allocations from within the pot of pooled health resources must then adequately prioritize PHC. General government revenue is increasingly seen as the best mechanism for financing PHC, given the changing nature of work, the persistent informality in LMICs, and the public-good character of population-based public health services. Evidence also shows that financing through general government revenues facilitates access to health services and improves financial protection for the population (Jowett and Kutzin 2015; World Bank 2016). Additionally, many LMICs are still building health system foundations for quality PHC, including basic infrastructure (for example, running water and sanitation), human resources, and reliable supply chains for health products (Cotlear et al. 2015). Such fixed-cost investments cannot be readily financed through recurrent health insurance premiums or user fees. Box 4.4 lays out the case for PHC financing through general government revenue in detail.

BOX 4.4 WHY FINANCE PHC THROUGH GENERAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE? General government revenue is increasingly seen as the best mechanism for financing universal health care (UCH)—and primary health care (PHC), specifically—for several reasons: ++ Changing nature of work: Demographic shifts and structural changes in employment are challenging the sustainability of employment-based resource mobilization models for the health sector, including labor taxes, employer-provided health insurance, and social health insurance (SHI). Particularly important shifts include population aging (and relatively fewer working-age adults relative to retirees), shrinking labor needs in some industries due to technological (Continued)

127


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Walking the Talk by World Bank Publications - Issuu