Walking the Talk

Page 128

WALKING THE TALK

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all Universal coverage of comprehensive PHC is not possible without a fit-­for-purpose workforce. Significant reforms to workforce training are needed to offer comprehensive PHC services in line with countries’ universal health care (UHC) ambitions. Multiprofessional health education must be embedded within PHC settings; oriented to generalist practice; and focused on the unique knowledge, skills, and competencies required in a PHC setting. Further, universal provision of wide-ranging, high-quality PHC services requires the health workforce to be efficiently deployed (WHO 2018b). To achieve this, each cadre’s specific scope of practice needs to be aligned with providers’ comparative advantages within the multidisciplinary team unit. In mixed health systems, addressing workforce constraints to quality PHC may also require engaging and contracting private providers with public funds, while ensuring robust quality control.

A new paradigm for medical education In addition to technical knowledge and skills, PHC team members need a range of nontechnical skills grounded in the patient-provider relationship and in the community context. A mutually trusting and respectful relationship is central to high-quality care, irrespective of the setting or discipline. Health workers require adaptive expertise, which involves innovation in addressing uncertain, complex, and novel situations, balanced with efficiency that draws on routine knowledge. Clinical decision-making requires skills different from those needed in most large hospitals. Geographic distance from tertiary care centers, inequities in the availability of human and institutional resources, and people’s rising expectations for high-quality comprehensive care, even in economically constrained environments, create a new and challenging environment for PHC. These circumstances necessitate approaches to diagnosis and treatment that are grounded in clinical courage and are at once flexible and innovative, based on self-reliance, as well as efficient and effective use of resources.

104

The transition to community team-based care models therefore requires a reorientation of the medical education system, particularly for physicians. The culture, pedagogy, and incentive structure of most medical education often work against the development of a fit-for-purpose primary care workforce. In most countries, the bulk of medical education and training is conducted in hospitals and other specialized settings that do not reflect PHC realities and service conditions. Most undergraduate medical education programs


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.