Walking the Talk

Page 108

WALKING THE TALK

BOX 4.1 WHY TEAM-BASED CARE? Multidisciplinary care teams for empaneled populations have been endorsed as the preferred primary health care (PHC) service delivery platform by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (OECD 2020a; WHO 2016; WHO 2018a). Intuitively, team-based models offer several advantages over individual providers or less integrated networks. ++ First, the multidisciplinary nature of the team allows for an efficient and appropriate division of labor, with different provider types deploying their complementary skills and competencies to meet the full (and increasingly complex) health and wellness needs of individuals and families. ++ Second, the team offers a supportive and accountable structure for management and supervision. Team members offer each other coaching, encouragement, mentorship, and discipline, while the team as a whole can be held responsible for the health outcomes and satisfaction of the empaneled population. ++ Third, through empanelment to a dedicated care team, individuals and families can build long-term, trusting relationships with their health providers, with continuity of care further enhanced through complete and accessible health records. ++ Finally, team-based organization may offer some structural efficiencies, for example, lower overhead, built-in critical mass for quality assurance and improvement, and lower administrative costs. Although the evidence base on multidisciplinary collaborative care is surprisingly sparse (Lutfiyya et al. 2019), emerging evidence appears to confirm these intuitions. A literature review on interprofessional collaborative practice identified 20 relevant studies, cumulatively pointing to improvements in chronic disease care, better medication adherence, reduced hospitalizations, and cost savings (Lutfiyya et al. 2019). Systematic reviews have found that the US-based Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH)—a multidisciplinary team-based model emphasizing patient-centered, coordinated, and comprehensive care—improves patient experience, care processes, and clinical outcomes for chronic disease (Jackson et al. 2013; John et al. 2020). The deployment of primary care teams within several centers in Canada, based on the PCMH, has been linked in several small studies to less frequent visits to emergency departments and reductions in avoidable hospitalization (Carter et al. 2016). In Brazil, the expansion of the Family Health Strategy team-based care model has been strongly associated with reductions in child mortality and (somewhat more tentatively) linked to reductions in hospitalization for conditions amenable to primary care-based prevention (Bastos et al. 2017). Several countries in Europe and Central Asia adopted multidisciplinary team-based care models under a family-centered PHC approach in the 1990s (World Bank 2005).

84


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.