Noncommunicable Diseases in Saudi Arabia

Page 196

174 | Noncommunicable Diseases in Saudi Arabia

TABLE 8.3  Recommendations

CONDITION

Colorectal cancer

regarding screening in comparative countries

MAIN SCREENING TESTS

Colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood tests, fecal immunochemical tests

US PREVENTIVE SERVICES TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION

Screening for colorectal cancer using fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy in adults beginning at age 50 and continuing until age 75

US PREVENTIVE SERVICES TASK FORCE GRADEa

A

RECOMMENDATIONS IN COMPARATIVE COUNTRIES

Cancer Council Australia (2017) recommends immunochemical fecal occult blood tests every two years, starting at age 50 and continuing to age 74. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2016a) recommends screening adults ages 50–74 with fecal occult blood tests every two years or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 10 years. It recommends not using colonoscopy as a screening test. Japan recommends fecal occult blood tests. It does not recommend colonoscopy for use in population-wide screening but allows colonoscopy to be used on an individualized basis (Hamashima 2018). The Netherlands invites individuals to be screened using a fecal immunochemical home testing kit between the ages of 55 and 75 (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment 2020).

Breast cancer

Mammography, MRI

Biennial screening for breast cancer with mammography in average-risk women ages 50–74

B

The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommends screening every two to three years in average-risk women ages 50–74 conditional on the relative value that a woman places on possible benefits and harms from screening (very low-­ certainty evidence) (Klarenbach et al. 2018). The Breast Cancer Screening Program in Ontario, Canada, screens high-risk women ages 30–69 annually with both a mammogram and an MRI (Warner et al. 2018). Japan recommends mammography for women ages 40–74 supplemented by clinical breast exams for women ages 40–64 (Hamashima et al. 2016). The Netherlands invites women to have a mammogram every two years between ages 50 and 75 (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment 2020).

Lung cancer (screening in high-risk smokers and former ­smokers)

Low-dose CT

Annual screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT in adults ages 55–80 who have a history of smoking 30 packs per year and who currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years

B

The recommendation of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2016b) is identical to that of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Cancer Council Australia (n.d.) does not recommend low-dose CT screening in people at high risk of lung cancer, citing the lack of local evidence of cost-effectiveness. Japan does not recommend low-dose CT in population-wide screening, but allows it on an individualized basis (Hamashima et al., 2016). (Continued)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

9.2 Focus on three levels of prevention in the master plan

2min
page 226

sector

1min
page 228

Methodological approach Identification of stakeholders influencing and participating in

4min
pages 236-237

in Saudi Arabia

2min
page 241

diets in Saudi Arabia

2min
page 240

9.5 Benefits of targeting settings

1min
page 231

Prioritizing prevention over treatment

2min
page 225

References

30min
pages 208-218

plans

1min
page 223

Cost-effectiveness of screening

2min
page 198

Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening uptake

2min
page 201

8.6 Cost-effectiveness of screening

4min
pages 202-203

Diseases

1min
page 222

Cost-effectiveness of screening promotion interventions Information gaps, policy recommendations, and future research

2min
page 204

8.3 Recommendations regarding screening in comparative countries

4min
pages 196-197

Effectiveness of screening

2min
page 195

United States

2min
page 193

Screening in Saudi Arabia

2min
page 192

7.17 Evidence on cost-effectiveness of diet-related interventions

5min
pages 166-167

7.16 Evidence on cost-effectiveness of tobacco control interventions

3min
page 165

Cost-effectiveness of population-wide interventions

1min
page 164

7.13 Evidence on effectiveness of setting nutrition standards

2min
page 159

7.10 Evidence on effectiveness of BOP and FOP labeling

3min
page 157

e-cigarettes

2min
page 155

7.6 Evidence of effectiveness of e-cigarette tax

2min
page 154

Saudi Arabia

2min
page 152

Conclusions

1min
page 131

Saudi Arabia

2min
page 150

Saudi Arabia

2min
page 151

Noncommunicable Diseases

5min
pages 143-144

Plan

1min
page 128

Methodology

2min
page 124

References

17min
pages 116-122

Annex 5B: Methodology for estimating the impact of NCDs on HCI

2min
page 115

Annex 5A: Approaches to estimating the economic burden of NCDs

2min
page 114

North Africa

5min
pages 104-105

5.4 NCDs and human capital: Transmission mechanisms

15min
pages 107-112

Conclusions

2min
page 113

Summary and conclusions Annex 4A: Methodology for estimating the economic impact

2min
page 96

Economic burden using the value of a statistical life method Economic burden using the economic growth approach

5min
pages 93-94

References

4min
pages 61-62

3A.2 Adjusted decrease in salt intake and changes to systolic blood pressure in Saudi Arabia, by gender 3A.3 Prevalence estimates for overweight and obesity in Saudi Arabia, by age and

2min
page 78

Economic burden using the cost-of-illness method

2min
page 89

3 Disease prevalence in the employed working-age population in

3min
page 26

3.1 Years of life lost, years lost due to disability, and healthy life expectancy

3min
page 64

and 2019

1min
page 39

3.2 Definition of risk factors for at-risk populations

5min
pages 67-68

Conclusions

2min
page 76
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.