Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Bus Systems

Page 174

156 | Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Bus Systems

TABLE A.12  Lessons

learned from the Avanza Zaragoza concession in Zaragoza, Spain

BEST PRACTICES

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

• Zaragoza’s bus system is part of a greater urban and transportation plan, the Sustainable Mobility Plan for Zaragoza (SMPZ). [planning risk] [design risk] [operation risk] • Zaragoza’s bus system is integrated with the streetcar line and accessible to pedestrians and bicyclists. [planning risk] [design risk] [operation risk] • Streetcar and bus tariffs are integrated. Since 2013, the price is the same for both services: €1.35 for a single ride without a transfer. [planning risk] [design risk] [financing risk] [operation risk] • Avanza Zaragoza provides a specialized service for people with limited mobility. They can schedule the service at the beginning of the week, and a specialized microbus will pick them up and bring them to their destination. [planning risk] [political and social risk] • The SMPZ is currently under review, which means that the municipality is constantly assessing the state of urban mobility in the city to find ways to provide better services for its citizens. [planning risk] [design risk] [political and social risk]

• Zaragoza could benefit from competitive procurement for the transportation system concession. However, balancing continuity of service over competition is something that governments with a high-performing concession should consider carefully. While competition could increase efficiency and achieve even better results, the government’s decision not to compete with the concession is considered reasonable, given the performance of the incumbent concessionaire. Avanza Zaragoza (previously Zaragoza Urban Transport) has been the only urban transportation operator since 1982. [planning risk] [design risk] • Avanza Zaragoza could provide better real-time information through its website and mobile applications. Not all services offer real-time information. [operation risk] • Currently, buses do not have priority signaling, particularly from traffic lights, which reduces the buses’ travel speeds. [planning risk] [design risk] [operation risk] • The municipality could consider increasing the size or number of buses to accommodate users better. Currently, buses seem to be close to their maximum capacity. [planning risk] [design risk] [operation risk] [political and social risk] • The municipality could consider replacing the aging fleet with newer, more energy-efficient buses. [planning risk] [design risk] [operation risk]

Source: World Bank.

Avanza Zaragoza operates and maintains buses and fare collection systems under a six-year contract. Zaragoza’s bus system has achieved positive results since its inception. It covers 93 percent of the population. Citizens conduct 22 percent of all trips through the bus system, equivalent to more than 89 million trips in 2017. In 2012 Zaragoza obtained the lowest congestion index among cities in Europe (Tranvía Zaragoza 2013). The bus system has an occupancy rate of 4.8 passengers per kilometer, which is higher than in other large Spanish cities. Further, 57 percent of the bus routes have an average waiting time shorter than five minutes. The buses travel at an average speed of 15 kilometers per hour. Table A.12 presents the lessons learned from the concession.

URBAN MOBILITY IN PORT-AU-PRINCE (HAITI) Urban mobility in Port-au-Prince has been constrained by rapid urbanization, low economic growth, and stagnant infrastructure development (Gorham and Sethi 2017). Congestion in the city is high—vendors crowd sidewalks and parked vehicles block the street, leaving little space for pedestrians and vehicles to ­circulate. Public transportation is provided informally by companies that operate ­inefficiently. This case shows the importance of having clear and effective regulation of public space before developing more complex public transportation systems.

Haiti is both the poorest and the fourth-most-urbanized country in Latin America and the Caribbean. From 2000 to 2015, the urban population in Haiti doubled from 3 million to 6 million. Rapid urbanization and low economic growth have resulted in congestion in Port-au-Prince. Urban mobility in Port-au-Prince is limited by the quality of infrastructure and overcrowding of public spaces. The road network is poorly maintained;


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

A.16 Lessons learned from the business collaboration agreements in Singapore

10min
pages 179-186

partnership

5min
pages 188-190

A.13 Lessons learned for urban mobility in Port-au-Prince, Haiti A.14 Lessons learned from the TransOeste bus rapid transit project in

2min
page 175

C.4 Essential elements of an operation concession contract

2min
pages 192-195

A.15 Lessons learned from the business collaboration agreements in Medellín, Colombia

2min
page 178

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

5min
pages 176-177

A.11 Lessons learned from the Metrobús-Q System in Quito, Ecuador A.12 Lessons learned from the Avanza Zaragoza concession in Zaragoza,

2min
page 173

Spain

3min
page 174

A.8 Lessons learned from the SYTRAL integrated public transportation system in Lyon, France

2min
page 170

A.9 Lessons learned from the DART Phase I bus rapid transit project in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

3min
page 171

Cali, Colombia

2min
page 169

Acapulco, Mexico A.7 Lessons learned from the Metrocali bus rapid transit project in

3min
page 168

Monterrey, Mexico A.6 Lessons learned from the Acabús bus rapid transit project in

5min
pages 166-167

Mexico City, Mexico A.5 Lessons learned from the Ecovía bus rapid transit project in

3min
page 165

Bogotá, Colombia A.4 Lessons learned from the Metrobús bus rapid transit project in

5min
pages 163-164

A.2 Lessons learned from the Transantiago bus rapid transit project in Santiago, Chile A.3 Lessons learned from the TransMilenio bus rapid transit project in

3min
page 162

in Lima, Peru

5min
pages 160-161

11.2 Situations affecting economic equilibrium A.1 Lessons learned from the Metropolitano bus rapid transit project

2min
page 156

Economic and financial elements

2min
page 155

Institutional and regulatory elements

7min
pages 152-154

11.1 Remuneration arrangements and incentives

4min
pages 150-151

Technical elements

1min
page 149

Setting up subsidies

4min
pages 145-146

Funding sources

9min
pages 141-144

Private financing instruments

12min
pages 135-139

10.1 Summary of the World Bank Group’s instruments

2min
page 140

Structuring a project’s capital

4min
pages 131-132

Model 4: Private finance and operation of electric buses

2min
page 125

Model 1: Bundled private finance and operation of buses

1min
page 115

bundled or unbundled

2min
page 122

Topical bibliography

5min
pages 108-114

Macroeconomic risks

1min
page 101

Topical bibliography

4min
pages 96-100

7.13 International lessons for achieving quality and level of service

2min
page 89

7.8 International lessons for managing fare evasion and cash risk

2min
page 85

7.7 International lesson for managing affordability risk

2min
page 84

7.1 International lessons for acquiring land

2min
page 80

Planning

1min
page 79

6.5 International lessons for defining technology components

2min
page 77

6.2 International lesson for dealing with incumbent operators

2min
page 71

5.1 Categories and types of direct risk, organized by project stage

2min
page 63

5.2 Definition of direct project risks

2min
page 64

Dealing with incumbent operators

1min
page 69

Identifying project risks

2min
page 62

Overview and guiding principles

1min
page 61

Institutional and regulatory elements

2min
page 56

Fiscal capacity

2min
page 55

Implement punctual infrastructure-related interventions

2min
page 47

Technical elements

2min
page 54

Support private sector initiatives to promote user-friendly technologies

2min
page 46

References

4min
pages 50-53

References

3min
pages 43-45

and Tendering

2min
page 41

2.2 Examples of the objectives and restrictions of key stakeholders

2min
page 42

References

2min
pages 39-40

public or private

2min
page 31

1.2 A public-private partnership: Three reasons why

2min
page 36

Notes

2min
page 38

What is a public-private partnership in urban bus systems?

4min
pages 29-30

Notes

2min
page 24

References

1min
pages 25-26

Further discussion

2min
page 37

Key Messages

5min
pages 22-23
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Bus Systems by World Bank Publications - Issuu