Employment in Crisis

Page 122

98  E m p l o y m e n t

in Crisis

FIGURE 4.8  Insufficient support, with many left behind a. Conditional cash transfer coverage Uruguay 2012 Bolivia 2012 Mexico 2012 Philippines 2015 Brazil 2015 Argentina 2013 Jamaica 2010 Colombia 2014 Dominician Republic 2014 Chile 2013 Ecuador 2016 Peru 2014 Panama 2014 Guatemala 2014 Costa Rica 2014 Honduras 2013 Bangladesh 2010 Paraguay 2011 Timor-Leste 2011

Average, 40.3

0

b. Amount of benefits received Bolivia 2012 Honduras 2013 Ecuador 2016 Mexico 2012 Argentina 2013 Brazil 2015 Paraguay 2011 Panama 2014 Peru 2014 Costa Rica 2014 Dominician Republic 2014 Colombia 2014 Chile 2013 Philippines 2015 Jamaica 2010 Timor-Leste 2011 Bangladesh 2010

80 100 60 20 40 % of population in the poorest quintile

Average, 15.6

0

20 40 60 80 100 % of beneficiaries’ post transfer welfare among the poorest quintile

Source: World Bank 2018.

income. A large body of research suggests that, on the whole, these benefits support positive incentives to return to work (Fiszbein and Schady 2009; Garganta and Gasparini 2015). However, this finding may imply that the amounts transferred are insufficient to robustly smooth consumption when livelihoods are destroyed by a crisis.10 Rationed benefits: Few social assistance cash transfer programs in Latin America and the Caribbean are entitlements. This distinction matters because budget allocations for most of these programs are discretionary, imposing limits on the amount of benefits that can be paid out to eligible households in any given year. Being eligible does not guarantee entry; there have to be slots available in the program, which depends on other households’ entry and exit into the program and on the government’s budget. In Argentina and Chile, this aspect of the programs has been changed. But even in Brazil—which is famous for its Bolsa Familia CCT program—prior to the recent expansion in coverage in response to COVID-19, more than one million eligible families were waiting for the rations on

benefits to be loosened or lifted altogether. Because these rations are politically and even legislatively cumbersome to loosen quickly, and because policy makers have many other demands to manage with limited fiscal space, it is difficult for social assistance cash transfers, as they exist today in most countries in the LAC region, to substitute for coverage by unemployment insurance plans. Argentina’s family allowance program is an instructive exception (box 4.1). Lagging investment in identification and delivery systems: The foundations of most social assistance programs are identification databases, known in most countries as social registries, which enable these programs to identify those in need. However, the share of the population covered by these registries in the LAC region is low and limited to the chronically poor and vulnerable. In the 2020 pandemic, the LAC countries have relied heavily on cash transfers to get money into the hands of vulnerable people quickly, some in more effective ways than others. A key determinant of the success of these efforts is the share of the population covered by the


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

23min
pages 151-159

Notes

6min
pages 149-150

Conclusion

6min
pages 147-148

4.18 Tackling structural issues that worsen the impacts of crises on workers

1min
page 146

4.12 Employment and reemployment policies, by the nature of the shock causing displacement

5min
pages 130-131

4.4 Permanent, systemic shocks: Responses to job dislocation caused by structural changes

3min
page 132

4.6 Evidence on the effects of place-based policies on mobility and labor market outcomes

3min
page 145

4.17 Labor market regulation instruments and the duration of unemployment

15min
pages 139-143

4.11 Positive effects of welfare transfers on local formal employment

5min
pages 126-127

4.5 How well have regional policies performed at strengthening economic opportunities?

3min
page 144

4.1 Family allowances as de facto unemployment insurance

3min
page 123

4.8 Insufficient support, with many left behind

2min
page 122

selected LAC countries

2min
page 121

Aggregate: Stronger macroeconomic stabilizers

6min
pages 106-107

4.1 Landscape of formal unemployment income support in the LAC region

2min
page 112

4.1 How adjustment works and a triple entry of policies to smooth it

1min
page 105

4.1 Unemployment insurance throughout the world

1min
page 113

Introduction

8min
pages 101-103

Three key policy dimensions

3min
page 104

References

11min
pages 96-100

Notes

3min
page 95

Places: The role of local opportunities and informality

6min
pages 92-93

Introduction

5min
pages 75-76

Workers: A bigger toll on the unskilled

6min
pages 77-78

Conclusion

3min
page 68

3.1 Effect on wages of displacement caused by plant closings in Mexico

3min
page 79

and informal sectors, 2005–17

1min
page 66

A changing employment structure and the disappearance of good jobs

3min
page 65

2.2 Cyclicality of net flows across sectors and out of employment, 2005–17

6min
pages 55-56

Key insights

15min
pages 29-33

References

5min
pages 42-43

Labor market flows: Unemployment versus informality

2min
page 50

Introduction

8min
pages 47-49

Notes

3min
page 41

1.4 Addressing crises’ impacts and preparing workers for change: Policy reforms

1min
page 39

1.3 Stabilizers and macroeconomic frameworks: Policy reforms

7min
pages 36-38

Rationale for this report

1min
page 25
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Employment in Crisis by World Bank Publications - Issuu