WMG Volume 3 • Issue 13 July 6, 2016
Wilton Manors Gazette
Business
Legal
Neon Signs:
Battle Over Vacation Rentals Continue as City Hires Law Firm
Nuisance or Necessary? By Michael d’Oliveira Neon is a necessity. That’s what business owner Nick Berry told city commissioners on June 28. Without neon signs, Berry says potential customers will drive right by businesses without knowing that they are there. “You won’t even see that it’s a bar. That it’s a restaurant.” According to the city’s code, “Neon, fiber-optic and similar tubing or banding. The use of banding or tubing on a building is permitted subject to the following conditions: The closest part of any tubing or banding on the sides of a building facing a residential or mixed residential/commercial lot shall be at least two hundred (200) feet from any such lot; (2) It is not used to border a window or any portion thereof; (3) It is limited to one band with up to three (3) colors per building; and (4) That the Director determines that it is used only to emphasize the architectural features of a building rather than to draw attention to the building itself.” City Attorney Kerry Ezrol said the general intent of sign codes is to ensure the aesthetics don’t get out of control and lead to eye sores. Berry asked the commission to “not be anti-business” and to take another look at the regulations regarding neon signs. His request sparked a familiar discussion amongst commissioners: “Are we going to start not enforcing codes? What was the purpose if not to enforce it?” asked Commissioner Justin Flippen. But Vice Mayor Scott Newton responded that the city has been willing to not be as stringent in enforcing some of its codes in the past. “We did that before on [business] flags. It’s kind of the same thing.” Commissioner Julie Carson stated there are other code regulations the city doesn’t actively enforce, such as requiring home
By Michael d’Oliveira
owners to keep their roof’s clean. In April, commissioners voted to allow business owners to keep displaying temporary signs and banners. Previously, business owners were allowed to use temporary signs and banners until December of 2015. When Mayor Gary Resnick said that the city should pay more attention to enforcing the flag and banner regulations along Oakland Park Boulevard, which he said had become an eye sore, the rest of the commission disagreed in favor of holding off on a code enforcement push. Resnick called the neon signs a matter of “the character of the city we want to be.” Newton said he didn’t consider neon signs a pressing issue as long as they weren’t too bright and intrusive. He added that business owners should be allowed to keep current signs up for now but new ones shouldn’t be allowed until the commission addresses the issue further. Resnick said he’d put his neon sign “back up tomorrow” if he was a business owner and heard the commission was not strongly enforcing its own regulations. Commissioners voted to review the regulations and discuss them at a future meeting. WMG
Experience and success were the driving factors in the commission’s decision to hire a law firm to defend Wilton Manors in the vacation rental lawsuit filed against the city. City Attorney Kerry Ezrol recommended Nabors Giblin & Nickerson because of the firm’s past success defending Flagler County against a lawsuit dealing with vacation rentals. In that case, the court ruled Flagler County could regulate vacation rental properties but only ones that started operations after the regulations were passed. Ezrol said Nabors Giblin & Nickerson were slightly more expensive than other firms but Mayor Gary Resnick said the extra expense would be worth it. “Folks, you don’t really want to nickel and dime this.” The lawsuit was filed in May by vacation rental owners Jeffery Hill and Roger France. They successfully sued the city several years ago over the same issue. In a previous commission meeting, Ezrol said the city lost because former Community Services director Wayne Thies tried to regulate vacation rentals by classifying them as transient rentals. A judge disagreed with the classification. This time, the city could have a stronger case because it passed regulations. Hill and France say the city is charging too much and is trying to discriminate against vacation rental owners. “The ordinance was drafted to discourage persons from renting properties for 30 days or less and to require personal information from those renters that is not required of renters for durations of more than 30 days,” reads the lawsuit. The cost of registering a vacation rental was also included in the lawsuit and labeled as excessive. In the lawsuit, the petitioners claimed the regulations would require the expenditure of $13,500 a year to register all their properties. The city requires each unit be registered for $750. “Let there be no misunderstanding. We
also want unlicensed rentals to either comply with the previous reasonable laws that we already have complied with or shut down, too. But adding requirements for those already obeying the law doesn’t stop those who are now and will continue to be illegal. Where is the equity in that?” wrote Hill and France in a letter to The Gazette on June 10. The city approved the regulations earlier this year amidst calls by residents to take action. Some residents have said that irresponsible tourists are ruining the peace and quiet of their neighborhoods by having late night parties. Parking and trash problems are also among the complaints. Some vacation rental owners have responded that they are responsible in whom they rent to and shouldn’t be punished because of the irresponsible owners. Commissioners responded to residents’ calls for action by saying they couldn’t pass regulations that were too stringent because it would put the city at risk for losing a lawsuit. “It’s a question of what your appetite for litigation is,” advised Ezrol at the time. WMG
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • www.WMGAZETTE.com • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 •
July 6, 2016
7.6.2016 •
27