Feb. 8, 2017: Report questions upward mobility at the College

Page 1

FEATURES P. 7

Farewell, Cantor Bob!

SPORTS P. 12

VOL. CXXXI, NO. 12

Ephs eke out win over Cardinals

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2017

Report questions upward mobility at the College By MICHAEL GREEN MANAGING EDITOR Last month, the Equality of Opportunity Project released a paper, “Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility,” which examined economic diversity and student outcomes at colleges and universities across the country. The report indicates that the average family income for students at the College was at the 78th percentile of all families with children born in the same year, while average individual income later in life for alumni was at the 72nd percentile. At the College, two-thirds of students are in the top quintile of family income, while 5.3 percent are in the bottom quintile and 13.4 percent are in the fourth. The student body currently draws 18.1 percent of its makeup from the top one percent of families alone. This pattern of student composition, skewed towards the highest levels of family income, was common among the 65 institutions that the study considered “elite,” including the College. The sample of all college-goers additionally had higher family incomes than the sample of all children, but was less skewed towards the top percentiles. Among all college-goers, 28.4 percent came from the top quintile, 12.4 percent came from the bottom quintile and 1.5 percent came from the top one percent.

Provost David Love offered an explanation for the lower share of students from the lower quintiles. “The reality is that highachieving [those scoring above 1450 on the verbal and math sections of the SAT] students from the bottom quintile are proportionally represented among Williams students,” Love said. Nationally, about 3 percent of students scoring above 1450 have family incomes of less than $20000 (approximately the upper boundary of the bottom quintile), as estimated from College Board data. “We, of course, continue to work to identify, recruit and enroll even more talented students from the bottom income quintile, but competition for these students is especially keen,” Love said. “We also face particular challenges related to lack of brand recognition, location and misunderstanding about a liberal arts education and affordability.” According to Carl McPherson ’14, a pre-doctoral research fellow at the Equality of Opportunity Project, family income distribution was “fairly stable” at the College during the years analyzed in the study. However, Love indicated that the share of students from the bottom three quintiles has increased since 2013, when the study’s data collection ended. For the class of 2020, 26 percent of students came from the bottom three quintiles, compared to 20 percent of students born in

MICHAEL GREEN/MANAGING EDITOR

Attendees of the College born in 1991 are heavily distributed towards the upper percentiles of family income, especially in the top quintile. 1991, most of whom belong to the class of 2013. According to Love, the College is making an effort to attract lower-income students through programs like Windows on Williams, Previews and Questbridge, along with outreach to

community-based organizations and high-school counselors. “Our efforts to attract students from lower-income backgrounds stem from the belief that talent and potential are much less likely to be correlated with family income than grades

and test scores [are correlated with income],” Love said. “In the past couple of years, we have become more intentional about using specific information about family income to identify and recruit exceptional students from less advantaged backgrounds,

and that effort has begun to pay off, as seen by our rising share since 2013 [of] students from the bottom three quintiles.” The average individual income for a student at the SEE MOBILITY, PAGE 5

CSS revises handling of College reflects on Winter Study grading in marijuana usage following light of Law School Admissions Council policy commonwealth referendum By RACHEL SCHARF EXECUTIVE EDITOR Although some students presumed that the legalization of marijuana in Massachusetts would produce a change in College policy, marijuana usage remains prohibited at the College since the drug’s possession and use are still considered illegal under federal law. On Nov. 8, 2016, voters passed a ballot initiative via referendum to legalize the recreational use of marijuana for anyone over the age of 21. While many students hoped this law would prompt a change in the College’s policy, the administration firmly rejected such a stance. On Dec. 12, President Adam Falk emailed the College community to clarify the College’s policy in the wake of the drug’s legalization, highlighting the role of federal funding in determining the College’s marijuana policy. “One might assume that with the new law the [College] would, in its policies and practices, treat marijuana much the same as alcohol,” Falk wrote. “But ... the federal government still considers marijuana to be an illicit drug. The college must abide by federal laws, including the Drug-Free Workplace Act and the DrugFree Schools and Communities Act. If we fail to comply, the [College] could become ineligible for federal funding and financial aid programs for students.” The College’s stance on marijuana, then, will remain unchanged, except for that the College will no longer contact the Williamstown Police Department (WPD) for all marijuanarelated incidents, as was necessary when marijuana was illegal in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Campus Safety and Security (CSS) will still respond to reports of marijuana consumption that fall within its purview and the Dean’s Office will still discipline all reported student use of marijuana, regardless of the age of the student. “It used to be that if you had a bong or a little bit of marijuana or residue, Campus Safety had to call the police every single time, and there would be some type of a fine, and it would be destroyed. But that all got written up and sent to our office for re-

view,” Senior Associate Dean of the College Rachel Bukanc said. “The same thing’s going to happen; [CSS] is going to do what [it] need[s] to do and write it up and send it to our office for review, but [it] will not often have to call the police … But the marijuana policy hasn’t changed.” The College will now only contact WPD in certain cases rather than for every marijuana infraction. “We’ve worked out a system with the police where we’ve identified areas where we absolutely have to call them where there are [criminal] violations … when the amounts are great enough or distribution is an issue,” Dave Boyer, director of CSS, said. “Other infractions such as underage possession we can handle [similarly] to the way we do with alcohol; we can confiscate it, we can dispose of it, we can refer the person to the Dean’s Office for the sanction process without having to involve the local police.” WPD Officer Shaun William echoed this sentiment: “The Williamstown Police Department will respond only if there is a violation of Massachusetts law, not a violation of Williams College policy,” William said. In formulating its response to statewide legalization of marijuana, the College looked to peer institutions. “We talked a lot with schools in Colorado,” Boyer said. “[We] looked at policies, had some direct conversations with colleagues, attended conferences [and] had some training sessions.” Bukanc noted that schools in Colorado and Washington state have similarly continued to prioritize adherence to federal law. “It looks like regardless of how liberal a school might be in terms of its general policies, I don’t know of any institution that is saying, ‘Well, it’s legal, so fine by us,’ because everyone’s concerned about financial aid and federal programs,” she said. “We don’t want to lose that. From what we have learned in these other states, all of these schools have clearly followed the federal guidelines.” Boyer added that peer institutions in Massachusetts, such as Amherst, are similarly retaining policies that follow federal guidelines.

By EMILIA MALUF MANAGING EDITOR

This is the first installment in a two-part series on Winter Study grading, which will examine the history of coursework evaluation and how an amended LSAC (Law School Admission Council) policy affects the term. Due to a recent revision of Law School Admission Council (LSAC) policy, law school applicants from the College will now see their Winter Study grades factored into their grade point averages (GPAs). On Nov. 21, 2016, Michelle Shaw ’95, associate director of the Career Center and pre-law advisor, sent an email to current law school applicants and students on the prelaw listserve informing them of the policy change. “LSAC has recently indicated that it has been correcting grades for Winter Study that it failed to convert properly,” Shaw wrote in the email. “You may be aware

WHAT’S INSIDE

that since 1995, [Winter Study] grades are issued on a threepass system (i.e. HP/PP/P [high pass, perfunctory pass, pass]). It has been LSAC’s policy to convert those grades to the A/B/C system. This means that [Winter Study] grades are now being numerically converted and may impact your overall GPA when converted by LSAC.” For the purposes of LSAC’s GPA conversion, a high pass is equivalent to an A, a pass to a B and a perfunctory pass to a C. After converting each Winter Study grade, LSAC will recalculate the student’s GPA. Winter Study is about three weeks long, while a regular semester is 12 weeks. LSAC, though, will equate one Winter Study course to one semester-long course in its grade recalculation. “LSAC is an organization responsible for administering the law school admission test and providing a document service to shepherd your paperwork through to the law school,” Shaw

said. “When LSAC gets information from transcripts, it puts it through its own matrix so the information that results from that looks the same throughout the country. That’s called an LSAC report, and a report is issued for every candidate.” According to Shaw, one of LSAC’s longstanding rules is that any institution that operates on a three-part grading system must be converted to the alphabetical grading scale. While LSAC’s Winter Study grade conversion policy went into effect this fall for applicants from the College, it is not a new policy. “This is a policy that’s been in place [with LSAC] since the ’70s,” Registrar Barbara Casey said. “It’s just because of an audit [it was] doing that [it] caught [that it was failing to enforce it].” The first Winter Study took place during the 1967-1968 academic year, but its original design did not include the three-pass system. The only grades students could receive were pass and fail.

“We conceived of Winter Study as a pedagogical laboratory that would encourage faculty and students to experiment with new subject matter and novel ways of packaging and delivering courses,” John Chandler, president of the College from 1973-1985 and chair of the committee that originally proposed Winter Study, said in reflecting on the establishment of Winter Study. “We saw the pass-fail grading system as a way of encouraging students and faculty to take risks and be venturesome and creative.” Winter Study fell under scrutiny at a faculty meeting in 1993. Faculty members debated whether to get rid of the period altogether and make each semester longer, or to find a way to encourage students to take it more seriously. One proposal involved switching to the letter grading system during Winter Study, but SEE GRADING, PAGE 5

AFTER MANY DELAYS, STUDENTS FLOCK TO ICE RINK OPENING WITH BROOMBALL, HOT CHOCOLATE AND MORE

3 OPINIONS

Defending College’s environmental efforts

5 NEWS

Faculty members join to oppose Betsy DeVos' nomination

6 FEATURES

Exploring 'North County Eats' restaurant week

8 ARTS

Talk confronts rape culture in visual work

12 SPORTS

Women’s hockey goes 1-1 with Trinity

USPS 684-6801 | 1ST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25

PHOTO COURTESY OF CLAUDIA FORRESTER


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.