Oct. 24, 2018: Liz Robinson ’90 chosen to chair board of trustees

Page 1

ARTS P. 9 Feminist tale 'Colette' comes to Images

SPORTS P. 10 The Independent Student Newspaper at Williams College Since 1887 VOL. CXXXIII, NO. 6

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2018

Rugby celebrates 60th anniversary with alumni

Liz Robinson ’90 chosen to chair board of trustees By RACHEL SCHARF MANAGING EDITOR During last weekend’s annual fall meeting, the College’s Board of Trustees elected Liz Robinson ’90 as its next chair. Robinson, who will begin her term on July 1, will succeed current board chair Michael Eisenson ’77. In an email sent to the College community, President Maud Mandel praised Eisenson for his dedication during his four-year term as chair. “Under Michael’s leadership, the board announced its landmark sustainability commitments – goals toward which we’re continuing to make progress,” she wrote. “He also guided the creation of our Investment Office, which has done such an extraordinary job of generating support for financial aid, among other programs. And he led the search process that brought me to Williams as president, for which I’m especially grateful!” Robinson retired in 2016 after 25 years at Goldman Sachs, the last decade of which she served as the firm’s global treasurer. Since then, Robinson has served on the Board of Directors of the Bank of New York Mellon and Russell Reynolds Associates, as well as the director of Every Mother Counts, an organization that works to provide maternity care in developing countries. In addition to serving on the College Board of Trustees since 2011, Robinson is an associate agent for her class and was a member of the presidential search committee, as well as a member of her class’ 25th reunion fund committee. Her extremely

PHOTO COURTESY OF WILLIAMS COLLEGE. On July 1, Liz Robinson ’90 will replace outgoing board chair Michael Eisenson ’77. She has served on the College board of trustees since 2011. positive experience as a student, during which she majored in economics and served as a Junior Advisor (JA), inspired her to remain involved in the College as an

alum. “I loved my four years at Williams,” she said. “The experiences I had in and out of the classroom, the friendships I made and the lessons I learned all shaped the per-

son I am today.” As a board member, she has appreciated the opportunity to contribute to many important conversations and moments in the College’s development.

“Over the last seven years, my board service has enabled me to participate in the dialogue on topics like educational access and affordability; and last year it was

a privilege to be part of the team that identified Maud as our 18th president,” Robinson said. “Williams continually evolves, but what has not changed is the focus on the liberal arts and the value of learning and living in a small and intimate community of people who are involved in that work. One of the things I’m proudest of as a trustee is the work we’ve done to nurture and support that learning community.” Robinson is excited to continue this work and take on a new leadership role as board chair. “Being a trustee has given me the extraordinary chance to work alongside my fellow trustees, administrators, faculty, staff, students and alumni on issues that impact the College and its community,” she said. “I’m delighted that starting in July I’ll have the opportunity to contribute to those efforts in a new way as board chair.” Between now and the beginning of her term in July, Robinson is looking forward to working with Eisenson to ensure a smooth transition. In addition, she is excited to work with President Mandel as the College embarks on a strategic planning process. “It’s rare and quite special that a school like Williams offers us the chance to step away from our everyday lives and think big thoughts about where we want to be in 20 or 30 years, and then how we want to get there,” she said of the possibility to be involved in larger visions for the College. “It’s a way of making sure we continue doing our best work in changing circumstances and making our already great institution even stronger!”

Massachusetts to vote on initiatives Neighborhood Leadership Team By SAMUEL WOLF NEWS EDITOR

On Nov. 6, Massachusetts voters will have the opportunity to vote on three statewide ballot measures. The result of each measure has the potential to both alter Massachusetts policy and affect the College, but only students who are registered as Massachusetts residents will be eligible to vote on the measures. Any of the three measures can be passed by a simple majority of voters in the election. Question 1: Nurse-Patient Assignment Limits The first measure, also known as Question 1, would mandate limits on the number of patients who could be assigned to a nurse at one time. The exact limit would depend on the condition of the patient receiving treatment. For instance, a nurse would only be able to care for one patient at a time if that patient were under anesthesia or had given birth within two hours. However, when caring for those with only minor conditions, the measure would allow for a nurse to be tasked with up to six patients at a time. Under the language of the measure, facilities would have to comply without reducing nursing or any other staff. In addition, any retribution against nurses for following these guidelines would be strictly prohibited. These restrictions would apply to all Massachusetts hospitals, including Berkshire Medical Center, where College students frequently go for medical attention. The measure has been highly contentious; groups both in favor of and against the initiative have spent millions of dollars promoting their opinion. U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey have both endorsed the measure, while Governor Charlie Baker opposes it. “Nurses work hard to take care of all of us when it matters the most, and we should do the same for them by establishing

standards to ensure they have the help they need to do their job safely,” Warren said in a Boston Globe article. Opponents have argued that some hospitals may try to force nurses into night shifts or hire inexperienced nurses in order to get around these regulations. They worry that some hospitals could be forced to halt certain services because of the regulations. The Health Policy Commission, a Massachusetts health watchdog group, estimated the cost of the initiative to the health care system as ranging from $676 million to $949 million. Nurses themselves are somewhat divided; the Massachusetts Nurses Association endorsed the measure, but the American Nurses Association of Massachusetts came out against it. The measure is contentious among voters as well. In a September poll, 44 percent of Massachusetts voters favored the measure, while 44 percent opposed the measure. Question 2: Advisory Comission for Amendments to the U.S. Constitution Regarding Corporate Personhood and Political Spending Question 2 of the ballot measures would create a citizen commission compromised of 15 members to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The intended amendments would include overturning the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision that allowed for virtually unlimited political spending in campaigns, as well as an assertion that corporations are not entitled to inalienable constitutional rights. If approved, this commission would come into existence on Jan. 1, 2019 and issue its first report on Dec. 31, 2019. The governor, secretary of state, attorney general, speaker of the Massachusetts House and president of the Massachusetts Senate would each appoint three of the 15 commission members. Any Massachusetts resident would be eligible to apply to join the commission, but the position would be unpaid.

The commission’s powers would be largely informal, and it would not have the power to pass a constitutional amendment, which requires approval by a supermajority in the U.S. House and Senate and ratification by 38 states. Nevertheless, most major Massachusetts political figures have come out in support of the initiative, including Baker, Warren and Markey. The measure also does not have a strong organized opposition, unlike for Question 1, and most political observers believe that it is likely to pass. Question 3: Gender Identity Anti-Discrimination Veto Referendum Question 3 concerns a law that was passed in 2016 that prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender identity, in regards to access to any “public accommodation,” meaning any location that is open to the general public. For example, this law outlawed denying transgender people the use of public restrooms. Opponents of this law, entitled SB 2407, have placed a repeal referendum on the ballot. Opposition is being spearheaded by the Massachusetts Family Institute, a socially conservative group, and a group called Keep MA Safe, which was created in response to the initiative and calls the law a danger to women. Most elected officials in Massachusetts, including Baker, Warren and Markey, favor the law. Groups favoring the law have spent approximately $4 million promoting it, whereas those opposed have spent closer to $500,000. Public polling shows the vast majority of Massachusetts residents favoring the law, with support averaging approximately 70 percent. The measure is phrased such that a “yes” vote is a vote in favor of the current law and a “no” vote is a vote in favor of repealing the law. Notably, Question 3 is the first statewide referendum on transgender rights in U.S. history.

restructures responsibilities By REBECCA PARK STAFF WRITER

neighborhoods is led by a NLT, consisting of a student Neighborhood Director This year, the Office of Stu- (ND) and six or seven HCs. dent Life (OSL) modified its In addition, an assistant dineighborhood programming rector for residential life model for on-campus upper- and housing from the OSL class residences in each of the helps to oversee manageCollege’s four neighborhoods. ment for each team. Each This year, the student Neigh- HC is responsible for helping borhood Leadership Teams’ with programming for their (NLT) responsibilities have neighborhood and the camshifted to include existing pus as a whole, ranging from campus programs: Williams bi-weekly house snacks to After Dark (WAD), Intra- events such as Homecoming murals, Life After Williams and Winter Carnival. (LAF) and Lyceum dinner. The prior structure providIn the past, these programs ed a vague definition of the were coordinated separately NLT programming. “NLT’s from Residence previous proLife and Housgramming “Overall responing, but each of model stated these committees that house sibilities for HCs are now comcoordinators remain the same; prised entirely were expected of House Coorto complete however, the prodinators (HCs) programs in and chaired by the following gramming model a Neighborhood areas: Health/ under which the Director. They Wellness/Spirhold weekly ituality, DiverNLT operates has meetings to plan sity/Inclusion/ their programs. Cultural, Art/ been revised” Assistant DiExpression, rectors for ResiCommunity Madeline Polidaro dential Life and Service/Susand Patricia Housing Madtainability and Leahey-Hays eline Polidoro Winter Study/ and Patricia House Cup,” Leahey-Hays Polidoro and Assistant Directors for explained that Leahey-Hays Residential Life this change has said. “These foand Housing come from a cus areas were reformatting very broad and of NLT events, open-ended, rather than a change in the resulting in HCs having a HC role itself. “There actually lack of direction when planhaven’t been any changes to ning events for their houses the House Coordinator (HC) and neighborhoods.” position specifically,” they That is the reason why OSL said. Overall responsibilities changed the structure and for HCs remain the same; format of NLT's programhowever, the programming ming responsibilities. “This model under which the NLT year, the NLT’s programoperates has been revised.” ming model is broken down The College has four resi- into three distinct parts: dential neighborhoods: Cur- house-level programming, rier, Dodd, Spencer and neighborhood-level proWood. Each of these four gramming and campus-wide

programming,” Polidoro and Leahey-Hays explained. While house-level and campus-wide programming have remained the same as in past years, the neighborhood-level programming has changed to provide more structure, encompassing WAD, LAF and Lyceum. “NDs and HCs were able to provide their preferences for SEE RESPONSIBILITIES, PAGE 5

WHAT’S INSIDE 3 OPINIONS Students voice support for affirmative action 5 NEWS Professor Matt Carter receives $369,000 grant 7 FEATURES Cari Naftali discusses work with refugees 9 ARTS Lecture series explores Cuban creative scene 11 SPORTS SAAC starts new chapter for studentathletes of color

USPS 684-6801 | 1ST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Oct. 24, 2018: Liz Robinson ’90 chosen to chair board of trustees by The Williams Record - Issuu