SPORTS P. 12
ARTS P. 8 'Antigone in Ferguson' awes
Grodecki '18 wins ITA singles title
The Independent Student Newspaper at Williams College Since 1887 VOL. CXXXII, NO. 4
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2017
CC announces results of fall elections By MICHAEL GREEN EXECUTIVE EDITOR On Sept. 26, College Council (CC) announced the results of the organization’s fall elections via a campus-wide email. Voting opened Sept. 24 and closed shortly before CC released the results. As most of CC’s executive board is elected to year-long terms in the spring, this election had races for only the assistant treasurer and class representative seats. Tyler Stebulis ’21, who ran uncontested, will serve as assistant treasurer until the beginning of the spring term, as will the newly-elected class representatives. Stebulis is excited to get to work. “I’m ecstatic!” Stebulis said. “It’s unreal, honestly. I’m looking forward to gaining experience, and handling students’ issues as effectively as possible. I really want to make a change for the better, and if anyone sees something on campus that they’d like to see changed I’d be more than happy to try and help!” Tony Fitzgerald ’18, Katherine Priest ’18, Lauren Steele ’18, Julia Yarak ’18, Chanel Palmer ’19, Harmon Pardoe ’19, Moises Roman ’19, Abel Romero ’19, Carlos CabreraLomeli ’20, Ashwin Dasgupta ’20, Vijay Kadiyala ’20 and Ellie Sherman ’20 will represent their respective classes. In addition, Stephen Ankoue ’21 (Williams Hall), Georgia Keogh ’21 (Sage Hall), Vicky Liu ’21 (Armstrong/Pratt) and Onyeka Obi ’21 (Mills/Den-
nett) will serve as representatives for their first-year dorms. The election also included voting for student members of the Honor and Discipline Committee, who will each serve for a year. Representatives will include Zach Brand ’19, Cassie Deshong ’21, Nicholas Goldrosen ’20, Jad Hamdan ’19, Jerry Li ’18, Holly MacAlpine ’20, Mohammed Memfis ’21 and Cassandra Pruitt ’18. Donglin Zhang ’19 will replace Brand for the spring semester. Turnout for the assistant treasurer race was at 26 percent. Turnout in the senior, junior and sophomore elections ranged from 18 percent for senior Honor and Discipline Committee representative to 28 percent for sophomore CC representative, which was the only contested race in this group. Turnout for Armstrong/ Pratt representative was 32 percent in the only uncontested first-year race, while all others had above 50 percent turnout. These turnout rates are in line with last fall’s turnout and lower than last spring’s, though spring turnout rates are generally higher than those in the fall (see “CC Elections Bring New Reps to Council,” Sept. 28, 2016). Vice President for Communications Michael Rubel ’19 has two ideas to improve future turnout. One is switching to a more user-friendly polling software and the other is having CC members not running for elections set up stations in public places where students can vote, as CC did in Doddrich for this election cycle.
MICHAEL RUBEL/CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHER
The newly-elected members of College Council met for their first meeting of the semester in Hopkins Hall last night. “I’m confident a more modern software could help boost turnout,” Rubel said. “The election’s physical presence on campus is key to turnout … and that’s something I’d like to focus on going forward.” Additionally, Rubel thinks it is important that CC recruit more candidates. “In that respect, our biggest goal should
College students aid those affected by Hurricane Maria By SAMUEL WOLF CONTRIBUTING WRITER On Sept. 20, Hurricane Maria made landfall on Puerto Rico, leaving widespread devastation in its wake. The following day, nearly every home on the island lacked electricity, roads were closed, gasoline was scarce and many people lacked sufficient food and water. In response to the ongoing humanitarian crisis, the College’s Puerto Rican community has organized, buoyed by the sense that their collective action could make a difference for their home island. VISTA is currently planning numerous fundraising efforts, and the organization has already created an easy opportunity for students to donate. “We coordinated with the Chaplain’s Office and SoCA (Students of Caribbean Ancestry) to offer students the opportunity to donate one
meal swipe for this week,” Karen Linares ’18, a co-chair of VISTA, said. “The proceeds will be split between the Community Foundation of the Virgin Islands and the Fundación Comunitaria de Puerto Rico.” The response to the tragedy began with three individuals: Mérida Rúa, professor of Latina/o and American studies, Agnes Lugo-Ortiz, a fellow at the Clark Center and Rosa O’Connor Acevedo, a teaching associate for Spanish. All three are Puerto Rican. “I heard about the hurricane on Wednesday; it was the day I had to teach two classes. I saw this hurricane destroy my island,” O’Connor Acevedo said. For her, the need to get involved was personal. “I had to do something, because I am here at Williams and enjoying all the benefits, but my family is struggling in Puerto Rico,” O’Connor Acevedo said. O’Connor Acevedo
lived her entire life in Puerto Rico before heading to Williamstown, and her family is from the southeast area of the island, one of the hardest-hit areas. For Lugo-Ortiz and Rúa as well, it has been a daily struggle to keep in contact with family and ensure that their loved ones are safe. “I sent [my cousin] a text asking if she had been able to see my 80-year-old aunt. It took a while to get back to me, but she’s alright. … They always say that they’re OK and they have food and water today, but I don’t know about the next few days,” Rúa said. On Sept. 24, O’Connor Acevedo, Rúa and Lugo-Ortiz met at Tunnel City Coffee to determine a plan, and ultimately decided to hold a larger meeting during which they could come up with a strategy for campus-wide action. Last Wednesday, that
SEE HURRICANE, p. 5
ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS BUILD "CELESTIAL PAVILION," ANGLED TO ALIGN WITH SOLSTICE, DESIGNED BY KATE LATIMORE '19
NICHOLAS GOLDROSEN /NEWS EDITOR
be getting upperclassmen involved,” Rubel said. “There’s some inherent difficulties in recruiting juniors and seniors: … CC needs to find innovative ways to communicate that CC can be a channel for those older students’ experience and perspective on campus. I think the key factor in achieving that goal
is communicating CC’s work on campus and making our meetings and procedures more accessible than ever.” CC co-President Web Farabow ’18 said that he is ready to get to work. “We’re thrilled to welcome a new council that includes five returning members and 11 first-time representa-
tives,” Farabow said. “We were impressed by the quality of this year’s self-nominations and can’t wait to get started.” According to Farabow, projects on the agenda for this semester include implementing a new student organizations bystander training program and improving Winter Study programming.
College changes teaching evaluations By NEENA PATEL EXECUTIVE EDITOR Starting in the fall of 2019, students will complete Student Course Survey (SCS) forms online. While the form will be administered online, the blue sheets of paper that provide commentary for the instructor will still be administered in class. The Ad Hoc Committee on the Evaluation of Teaching of 2016-2017 implemented this change. The committee was originally tasked with “thinking broadly about the question of what constitutes good teaching, and how we as an institution evaluate teaching,” according to chair of the committee and Professor of History Eiko Maruko Siniawer ’97. The committee's goal was to assess the methods that the College uses to evaluate teaching and take a closer look at how they are all related. “We did not begin our work focused solely on the SCS form, or on the issue of whether or not it should be moved online,” Siniawer said. “As the committee’s ideas evolved, and as we talked with faculty and staff colleagues, a new SCS form took shape.” After looking at the new SCS, the committee decided it would be much easier to complete it online than on paper. “The new SCS form solicits qualitative comments and includes tailored questions; for various reasons, this format is most effectively administered online,” Siniawer said. The Ad Hoc committee of 2015-2016 also looked at the SCS and thought about moving it online; however, it was not done until the 2016-2017 committee changed the form. Many peer institutions already conduct course evaluations online. While SCS forms will not move to an online format for all students until fall 2019, the committee recommended a pilot program in order to detect potential problems. This pilot program would occur during the 2018-2019 school year. In the spring of 1971, a voluntary college-wide course evaluation form was administered and was used
regularly by the fall of 1972. In 1988, the faculty voted to make mandatory the SCS form as well as student interviews, which are interviews that the tenured faculty conduct of students enrolled in a course as a method of evaluation. In 1992, the SCS was edited and it became required to supplement it with another way of gathering student opinion, such as interviews or questionnaires. “Indeed, before last year, the College had not done a holistic review of all of the methods of evaluating teaching since 1992,” Siniawer said. The current SCS form was implemented in a faculty vote in 2005 and has been in use ever since. Across departments there are variations in how teaching is evaluated, and the standards and procedures for the evaluation of teaching are outlined in the Faculty Handbook. For the most part, all use a combination of the SCS form as well as student interviews, questionnaires and class visits. “As part of the Ad Hoc Committee’s work, we brought forward for faculty consideration changes that emphasize the value of using multiple and different methods of evaluation to form a holistic picture of a faculty member’s teaching,” Siniawer said. In the fall of 2018, units must use three different methods to evaluate the teaching of untenured faculty members. They will include the SCS form, a method other than SCS for gathering individual student opinion and a method for peer review that involves observing teaching. To gather student opinion, units can use tools such as student interviews or questionnaires and, to observe teaching, evaluative measures such as class visits can occur. Right now, the Faculty Handbook only requires usage of the SCS, so this is an alteration to previous protocol. “Students should, then, be aware not just of the importance of the SCS form, but also of a questionnaire should they be asked to fill one out for a given instructor/course and of an inter-
view should they be invited to offer their thoughts on a given instructor/course,” Siniawer said. “And students should consider it a regular practice for a faculty evaluator to be present in some sessions of a class they are taking, as part of the process of conducting class visits.” It is important to note that this is applicable only to the evaluation of faculty teaching and not research and scholarship, which have other methods of evaluation. The College will significantly delay students' access to their grades if they do not complete their SCS forms for every course that they are enrolled in. Siniawer is not concerned with a reduction in response rates as a result of the change. “At peer institutions with a similar incentive, the response rates for online administration of evaluations are around what they currently are here at Williams,” Siniawer said.
WHAT’S INSIDE 3 OPINIONS
Leniency toward sexual assault
4 NEWS
Title IX policies will not change with OCR update
7 FEATURES
Thesis considers black women & media
9 ARTS
Kenny Garrett wows on sax
11 SPORTS
Arsenault Livingstone inspires student-athletes
USPS 684-6801 | 1ST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25