May 3, 2017: Not set in stone: Unclear vision for marble project

Page 1

SPORTS P. 12

ARTS P. 8 Wadsworth composes innovative works

VOL. CXXXI, NO. 21

Both track teams win NESCACs

WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2017

Not set in stone: Unclear vision for marble project By KATIE SWOAP CONTRIBUTING WRITER This is the second in a series of stories exploring how the College undertakes new building projects. The stories were originally produced for the course ANTH 232, "Town and Gown," co-taught by David Edwards and Chris Marcisz, and revised and abridged for publication. Last October, Erin Hanson ’19 created an online petition titled “Williams College: Sell 4-5 marble slabs to pay for a new therapist at the health center.” The petition described the deficit in mental health support services at the College, which were largely due to a lack of funding and limited professional staff. It directly protested the tremendous amount of money the College funnels into building projects, particularly the recent 143-piece marble quad landscaping reaching from Frosh Quad past Paresky Student Center to Sawyer-Stetson Quad. The petition demanded that the College sell four or five slabs and use the money to hire an additional therapist for students. In under 48 hours, the petition had over 500 digital signatures – more than a quarter of the total student body. The white slabs of marble strewn across the SawyerStetson quad have become some of the most controversial icons of campus. Skeptical professors referred to the slabs of marble as “FalkHenge” and students dressed

up as the scattered pieces of landscape architecture for Halloween. How did marble landscape architecture create such a polarized and intense response across students, faculty and the administration of the College? The Project After the Sawyer-Stetson project was completed in 2013, the College began to search for an architectural landscaping firm to create a landscape for the new quad space. Bruce Decoteau, senior project manager in the College’s facilities department, acted as the head project manager of the Sawyer-Stetson Quad project. He explained that the committee for the project was comprised of two students, a small group of professors, a sustainability representative from the Zilkha Center and an administrative representative from the president’s office. The first collective step of this committee was to create a framework of goals that the architecture and landscaping of Sawyer-Stetson Quad would meet. The committee found it critical to reflect the College’s commitment to environmental sustainability. In addition, the committee wanted a quad that had “flexibility for multiple uses, infrastructure for tents and events with ways to run power … complementing pedestrian access, a space to create community, a lesson in simplicity and a heart of the campus at the center of the campus,” Decoteau said. Decoteau explained that with this list of goals in hand, the

NEENA PATEL/EXECUTIVE EDITOR

The marble slabs on Sawyer Quad were meant to emulate and integrate multiple geologic features of the area surrounding the College. committee invited six firms to pitch their ideas for their design of the Sawyer-Stetson quad’s landscape. When Stephen Stimson Associates pitched their project idea – marble ledges, a storm garden and a tree-filled quad – “the committee fell in love,” Decoteau said, and voted unanimously on the design. Decoteau noted that he

was thrilled by the proposal and that it aligned very closely with the goals laid out in the project, making the decision process “simple” for the committee. As the project became more detail-oriented, it grew significantly in magnitude, both spatially and financially. Originally, the project only included the area from Chapin Hall

College wind farm efforts recede as governmental, legal hurdles arise By SOPHIA SCHMIDT STAFF WRITER The following is the final part of a three-part series on the never-consummated plan for the College to build a wind farm in Berlin, N.Y. In 2007, the College made its first formal environmental commitment: to reduce emissions to 10 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. Following this announcement, a donation by Selim Zilkha ’46 provided funding for the Zilkha Center for Environmental Initiatives. It was a “one-woman thing” at the time, remembered Stephanie Boyd. With a background in civil engineering and close ties to the facilities department, Boyd was that one woman, serving as director of the nascent Zilkha Center. Enter JJ Augenbraun ’08, an enthusiastic physics major and environmental studies concentrator. During his first year at the College, Augenbraun became involved with the Zilkha

WHAT’S INSIDE

Center as his campus job – he credits this experience with his current career at EnergySavvy, a renewable energy software company. In the summer of 2008, Augenbraun, an intern at the Zilkha Center, wrote yet another feasibility report for the Berlin Pass wind farm. Augenbraun’s report used data from the Hopkins Memorial Forest (HMF) anemometer and, in fact, considered HMF as an alternate site for a wind farm before finding it less convenient in terms of access, grid connection and land-use regulation than the Berlin Pass site. According to Augenbraun, the College’s total electricity usage had grown to roughly 22 gigawatt-hours (GWh) by 2008, and three 1.8 megawatt (MW) turbines would be needed to meet this demand. Augenbraun estimated that the total cost of the project would be about $17 million – the highest estimate yet – with a payback period in the range of five to 10 years.

After Augenbraun finished his report, Boyd petitioned senior staff for a budget increase to pursue a professional feasibility study. They approved the request, and the Zilkha Center hired the environmental consulting firm Sustainable Energy Designs (SED), which has since rebranded as SunCommon, to further investigate the prospect of a wind farm. Why had the sixth student report on a Berlin Pass wind farm finally captured the attention of College administrators? In Augenbraun’s words, it was the “perfect storm of factors.” Renewables had come back into the national conversation due to broadening awareness of climate change. The College had made sustainability an institutional commitment. Wind technology had become more efficient. A successful wind farm had been built in 2007 on Jiminy Peak in Hancock, Mass., bolstering a small-town coffer, and other local wind projects followed

in 2011 on Bakke Mountain in Florida, N.Y., and Crum Hill Mountain in Monroe, N.Y. With the SED study in progress, Boyd and Jim Kolesar ’72, assistant to the president for community and government affairs, began to gauge the town of Berlin’s attitude toward a potential project. Kolesar said that in conversations with “folks that were well ingrained in the community,” he sensed a shift since the 2004 zoning board meeting. People were “interested,” he said, even “very positive.” Kolesar, who was “totally befuddled” by this change, guessed that Berliners had noticed the success of projects in neighboring towns and the “financial boon” wind projects had become. SED was “quite impressed with JJ’s work,” Boyd said. SED once again found the Berlin Pass site to be well endowed with a “strong wind resource.” The study predicted that that this resource could “translate into favorable financial returns.”

SEE WIND FARM, p. 5

STUDENTS ANXIOUSLY WAIT TO GET THEIR ROOM ASSIGNMENTS FOR NEXT YEAR IN GREYLOCK DINING HALL

3 OPINIONS

Raising concerns about free speech resolution

4 NEWS

Results of spring '17 College approval ratings survey

7 FEATURES

@thebreakfastchick features favorite morning eats

8 ARTS

'Into the Woods' dazzles and teaches

10 SPORTS

Calichman '90 finds MLS success

TONY FITZGERALD/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

Drive and east toward Stetson Library, but expanded by closing Chapin Hall Drive to through traffic and renovating Chapin Hall Plaza and Frosh Quad. Decoteau said that the “huge project just kept getting bigger and bigger” and referred to this as “scope creep.” He explained that the magnitude of scope creep was likely

due to the desire of the current administration, which wanted to make the central quad much more pedestrian friendly and create a new, state-of-the-art center of campus. In total, the Sawyer-Stetson Quad project cost the College $12.5 million.

SEE MARBLE, p. 5

College revises JA grant By NICHOLAS GOLDROSEN NEWS EDITOR Next year, the College will continue its policy of covering, via a grant, the academic-year student income contribution for students receiving financial aid who serve as junior advisors (JAs). However, administrators will make several changes to the way in which this grant is disbursed, specifically with regards to JAs seeking out student employment on campus. Starting with the JAs to the class of 2020, JAs who receive financial aid from the College received a grant that covered the academic-year student income contribution that is expected from students as part of typical financial aid packages. According to the Office of Financial Aid’s website, the current contribution from on-campus, school-year employment is $2700 for returning students. This contribution is separate from the summer earnings requirement of $1950. The contribution has been covered in the form of additional grant aid, rather than a loan or other form of student or family contribution. “This grant, like all Williams grants, is fund[ed] by the endowments supporting financial aid,” Director of Financial Aid Paul Boyer ’77 said. The change was intended to both encourage students receiving financial aid to apply to be JAs and to allow JAs to focus on their role rather than having to also devote time to on-campus employment. “This change was spear-headed by Dean [of the College Sarah] Bolton, prior to her leaving Williams, to encourage financial aid students to apply to be JAs, knowing that to be the best JA, the hours required to hold a campus job and earn the expected contribution detracted from time available to undertake JA responsibilities,” Boyer said. “Over the past few years, there was some concern that students on financial aid who had to engage in work study as part of their school year student contribution to their aid package might feel less able to take on the role of JA,” Dean of the College Marlene Sandstrom said, “because it would be difficult for them to be available to first-year students and provide all of the required work hours necessary to meet their financial aid obligations. As an institution, we want to be sure that aided stu-

dents who are interest[ed] in becoming JAs do not face barriers to serving in that role. It is crucial that all students who have the interest and aptitude be able to pursue the JA option.” This year, however, JAs primarily brought up issues to the Dean’s Office regarding how the grant affects allowed opportunities for on-campus employment. JAs receiving this grant, similar to recipients of other scholarships that cover the student income contribution such as the Tyng Scholarship, Mellon-Mays or Allison Davis Undergraduate Research Fellowship, were not allowed to hold any on-campus employment without special permission. For JAs, this dispensation would be required to come from the Dean of the College. “The current system provided all JAs on financial aid with the entire grant,” Sandstrom said. “As a result they were expected not to work. We realized, however, that there are some JAs on financial aid who want to work (despite the grant) because certain jobs play a key role in their academic or personal growth (e.g., serving as a TA or RA). This year I made exceptions for students who were interested in pursuing a very limited amount of paid work in addition to the grant, but the process was cumbersome.” Given that most JAs receiving financial aid were not able to hold campus employment, they also were not able to earn money for everyday expenses; the entirety of the grant went towards covering the student oncampus earnings contribution. “Next year's JA grant program will allow more flexibility for students to balance paid work with the grant if they so choose (e.g., they can work one semester and receive the grant in the other semester), and will disperse the grant in a way that provides students with cash for their personal expenses,” Sandstrom said. Administrators hope that these changes will allow JAs receiving financial aid to both pursue meaningful employment and earn money for personal expenses while allowing them to focus on the responsibilities of being a JA. USPS 684-6801 | 1ST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.