Skip to main content

May 2, 2018: Wall on Paresky lawn protests Israel, U.S. borders

Page 1

ARTS P. 8 New Japanese animation studio debuts first film

SPORTS P. 12 The Independent Student Newspaper at Williams College Since 1887 VOL. CXXXII, NO. 22

WEDNESDAY, MAY 2, 2018

Women's track and field places first at NESCACs

Wall on Paresky lawn protests Israel, U.S. borders By SAMUEL WOLF NEWS EDITOR On Tuesday, April 24, the Coalition for Immigrant Advancement (CISA), the International Club (IC), Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and Vista collaborated to put up a wall on Paresky lawn. The wall, which contained images of Palestinian and Latinx struggle, was designed to invoke both Israelibuilt walls and the walled areas along the U.S.-Mexico border. Yesterday, it was formally taken down to celebrate the demolition of barriers. The groups also released a joint statement through an allcampus email that detailed the intended purpose of the structure. “By putting up a mock wall on the center of campus, interrupting the space between Paresky and Sawyer, we hope to force our fellow students to reflect on the impact of walls like these – and all militarized borders – on the daily existence of millions of people,” they wrote. The statement also explicitly linked the Israeli and U.S. walls. “As students committed to justice, we know that Israel’s apartheid wall and Trump’s border wall in the United States are two sides of the same coin of white supremacy and settler colonial violence,” the statement said. The wall’s Palestine-inspired murals contained writings such as “Gaza will be free,” “visit Palestine” and “Israel is an apartheid state.” One mural, titled “Theft of Land,” depicted the diminishing of Palestinian land in the Middle East alongside the destruction of Native American land in the United States. Several murals also protested American border fencing with statements like “demilitarize the border” and a statement calling for the United States to reduce deportation, detention and incarcera-

SOPHIA SHIN/PHOTO EDITOR

CISA, IC, SJP and Vista created the wall to protest borders erected by the U.S. and Israel. Murals emphasized solidarity between Mexicans and Palestinians. tion. Certain murals directly linked the Palestinian and Latinx struggles. One read, “From Chiapas [a southern Mexican state] to Palestine, resistir es existir [to resist is to exist].” Another depicted a Palestinian woman and a Mexican man, with a caption below them reading, “We didn’t cross the border/ The border crossed us.” Amina Awad ’18, co-chair of Minority Coalition (MinCo) and head of SJP, explained the message behind the wall and her connection to the issue. “The wall is a testimony to indigenous resistance and solidarity across multiple borders,” she said. “This wall serves to both physically and metaphorically represent and start a discussion on the ways in which students on campus are affected by the violence of bor-

ders. The driving force behind constructing the wall for me was the violence enacted upon my family with the formation of borders, from my Palestinian grandfather not being able to return to Jerusalem – the city of his birth – after being forcefully displaced along with hundreds of thousands of Palestinians by the inception of the Israeli state 70 years ago, to my father not being able to enter the U.S. to attend my graduation because of U.S. immigration politics.” Many of the wall’s creators emphasized the importance of the relationship between Mexico and Palestine as displayed on the wall. “One of the main reasons I wanted to be part of this project was because I believe it is necessary to have these conversations about the interna-

tional solidarity between Mexico and Palestine,” Vista member Katrina Martinez ’18 said. SJP member Hattie Schapiro ’18.5 emphasized the importance of “[reminding] our fellow students that both the U.S.-Mexico border wall and the Israeli apartheid wall have wrought unimaginable violence on people, primarily people of color and indigenous people.” Carlos Cabrera-Lomelí ’20, a member of Vista and CISA, warned against seeing the wall as collapsing the two struggles into one. “The wall does not seek to conflate the struggles of the Palestinian people and Latin American migrants moving through the border,” he said. “If that was our intention, we would have crammed both visual conversations on one side of the wall. But

we did not. We used the two different sides of one wall to make it clear that injustice, prejudice and abuse of power [are] both present in the borderlands of the United States and of Israel.” Accompanying the construction of the physical wall was an event on April 25 in Hopkins 002 followed by a candlelit vigil beside the wall. Entitled “Transnational Solidarity: From Mexico to Palestine,” the event featured two speakers, Gazan activist Rawan Yaghi and Professor of Comparative Literature Amal Eqeiq, and was well-attended by students and faculty. “As we begin our conversation about settler colonialism and construction of borders, I think it’s really important to remind ourselves that we are right now in a settler colonial state, that we are standing on

Mahican land that was stolen,” Awad said at the commencement of the talk. Awad then introduced Yaghi, who currently lives in Gaza and spoke through Skype. “Gaza is surrounded by borders, whether material borders or imaginary borders,” Yaghi began. “Borders in Palestine hold many purposes. The most obvious one is controlling peoples’ movements, which has clear practical and psychological effects… It creates a psychology of people who cannot say when they can leave a place and when they can enter a place. Every moment in their lives is controlled by another entity.” Yaghi highlighted what she viewed as the two main effects of building a wall around Gaza. The first, she said, was dehumanization. She claimed that, when Israelis no longer come into regular contact with Palestinians, it becomes easier to view Palestinian people as non-human, making it “easier to create false narratives and to create fear among populations.” The second rationale that she saw was economic. “Gaza has become a confined market, or a captive market, for Israel’s goods,” she said. “They feed their goods into this place and make sure that their goods are being consumed. This creates a stable economy for them.” Yaghi also drew attention to the difficulty that Gazan people face in crossing these borders. “[Gazans] can’t leave the country without Israeli permission, which will not be granted to them,” she said. “Even those who want to get medical treatment have tremendous difficulty finding their treatment in Gaza… Sometimes they don’t get that approval unless they’re blackmailed or asked to cooperate.” Yaghi then called attention to the protests currently taking place across Palestine. SEE WALL, PAGE 4

Subway on Spring Street closes CC changes bylaw to increase By REBECCA TAUBER NEWS EDITOR This Sunday saw the final day of Subway on Spring Street. The shop, which opened in 2009, rejoined Spring Street two years after a prior location burned down in 2007. Owner Brigesh Patel previously owned a Subway restaurant in North Adams and an additional two in Williamstown, but he sold

the other Williamstown locations last year and the North Adams location last week. Patel claimed that he closed the Spring Street location for both familial and economic reasons. “When we first opened, we used to stay open until 11 [p.m.] because there were so many students,” he said. “I remember the first few years, we actually had to push people out at 11. Right now,

we would be lucky if we had people until 9.” In addition to competition with other businesses on Spring Street, Patel believes that recent changes to the College’s meal plan also played a prominent role in lowering his business’ success with College students. This past fall, the College made three changes in meal SEE SUBWAY, PAGE 5

GARFIELD HOUSE WAS BROUGHT OFFLINE IN THIS YEAR'S HOUSING LOTTERY, WHICH WAS DELAYED UNTIL SATURDAY. THE COLLEGE PLANS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT DORM OFFLINE EACH YEAR DURING RENOVATIONS, TURNING MANY FLEX ROOMS INTO DOUBLES.

KATIE BRULE/PHOTO EDITOR

MinCo representation on student-faculty committees By TARAN DUGAL

COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR

Earlier this month, College Council (CC) passed a bylaw change that stipulates the addition of two new positions on its Appointments Committee, which reviews self-nominations from students for appointment onto a number of student-faculty committees. As a result of the new bylaw, the Minority Coalition (MinCo) Steering Board will be responsible for appointing two representatives from its own board to the Committee. According to CC’s Vice President for Commitment and Diversity Tania Calle ’20, the bylaw change came as a result of a “general sentiment on the part of students of color that there was not enough diversity represented on student-faculty committees.” Calle explained that the bylaw was also enacted in order to try to resolve the disconnect between students of color and representation on student-faculty committees. “In the past, it was brought up to us that several students of color who applied for positions on certain student-faculty committees felt like they wouldn’t have a place on the committees they wanted to most be a part of,” she said. According to Calle, the proposed change to the bylaw itself became a relatively contentious topic among members of CC, who ultimately agreed to pass it after some debate. One concern raised among CC members was that other organizations, such as the Committee on Diversity and Community,

could be responsible for enacting such a change. This notion was eventually disregarded, however, and CC and MinCo representatives worked together to draft and pass a bylaw that members of both groups found satisfactory. The bylaw stipulates that any two representatives from the MinCo Steering Board, not just the co-chairs, are eligible to join the Appointments Committee. Members of both CC and MinCo will meet this weekend to decide which MinCo Steering Board members will ultimately be placed on the Committee. Calle emphasized that students should capitalize on the work done by CC and MinCo to address the issue of representation. “I definitely want to encourage students of color to apply not only to student-faculty committees, but others as well, because it’s extremely important to ensure that the voices of minority students on campus are equally represented,” she said. “When you only have a select amount of students of color applying to these committees, it makes it exponentially harder to try and guarantee anything close to proportional representation.” Calle drew parallels between the new bylaw and other issues of representation on campus. “There are a lot of movements on campus right now that are relevant to other issues that are extremely similar,” she said. “Take the movement for the creation of an Asian American Studies program, for example. That’s a movement that a lot of students are very passionate about and have a lot of support for.

I think that having a stake in these various movements of representation on campus is super important and that all students, especially students of color, should try and be more active with regard to these campaigns.”

WHAT’S INSIDE 3 OPINIONS A statement of Jewish and Israeli solidarity 4 NEWS College donates to construction of new police station 7 FEATURES Examining when the College's flags fly at half-mast 9 ARTS Student playwrites showcase work at Purple Valley Plays 11 SPORTS Rachel Asher Hyland '09 takes fourth in Boston Marathon

USPS 684-6801 | 1ST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
May 2, 2018: Wall on Paresky lawn protests Israel, U.S. borders by The Williams Record - Issuu