SPORTS P. 12
ARTS P. 8
Clark presents Monies
VOL. CXXXI, NO. 14
Women’s track takes silver at New Englands
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2017
Joey Horn '87 resigns from Board following conviction Horn, her husband receive five-month prison sentences in Norwegian au pair case
By NICHOLAS GOLDROSEN and WILLIAM NEWTON NEWS EDITORS On Thursday, Joey Shaista Horn ’87 resigned from the Board of Trustees following the conviction and sentencing of her and her husband, Ragnar Horn ’85, for immigration and penal law violations in Norway. Norwegian police first began investigating the couple in December 2014 for breaking au pair laws as part of a case that has gained national attention in Norway as a referendum on the country's au pair program. On Feb. 3, the Oslo District Court sentenced the Horns to five months in prison for lying to immigration authorities about their employment of two Filipino au pairs, one of whom was registered to work for a neighboring family, and using them as housekeepers rather than as au pairs. The Norwegian au pair program allows families to hire only one au pair per household. While the Horns did not contest that they employed two au pairs between 2012 and 2014, they are currently appealing the court’s decision to interpret the nature of the work the au pair’s performed as housekeeping, rather than the light housework au pairs are legally allowed to perform. This interpretation ultimately led to their conviction under Norway’s criminal code for lying to the Directorate of Immigration about whether the women
they employed were au pairs or housekeepers. “On the grounds of said indications [the performance of housework], the court finds it proven beyond reasonable doubt that Ms. [Jackielyn Carino] Manzanero, Ms. [Jovelyn Mendoza] Carino and Ms. [Violeta Timoan] Emilio were housemaids for the Horns and not au pairs. It is therefore not necessary for the court to take a stand to other circumstances that have been asserted as indications that they were housemaids,” the court wrote, according to the official English translation of the judgment. The court relied on specific discrepencies in the tasks the au pairs performed in reaching this conclusion. “During at least the warmer half of the year, [they] washed the cars every Saturday, changed the linen on the beds every week, not only the children's beds but also the grown-ups' beds and washed and ironed clothes almost every day,” the court wrote in its judgment. The court largely rejected the au pairs’ claims for damages, as well as their claims of mistreatment, but did require that the Horns pay a fine of 372,000 NOK ($44,600 USD) to the state and 34,200 NOK ($4100 USD) to one of their au pairs. The Horns have filed an appeal, which the Norwegian appeals court expects to receive shortly, contesting their sentence and penal law conviction for lying to authorities. The Horns believe that
PHOTO COURTESY OF WILLIAMS COLLEGE
Joey Horn '87 and Ragnar Horn '85 speak in a video the College published in 2013 to celebrate the construction of the new Sawyer Library. the appeal, if granted, would likely be heard in 2018. While the court's original ruling called for an immediate sentence, their counsel stated that the sentence has since been suspended until the conclusion of the appeal. “Mr. and Mrs. Horn have both acknowledged that they employed two au pairs when Norway's laws restrict each household to just one and that they allowed paperwork to be filed suggesting that one au pair would be working for their
neighbors,” according to a statement made on behalf of the Horns through Ragnar Horn's counsel, Svein Holden. “They sincerely regret their mistake and have apologized. They are appealing the judgment entered by the Norwegian court because, while they agree with the essential facts on which the decision is based, they do not agree with its legal conclusions and do not believe that the penalty is a just or reasonable punishment.” According to President Adam Falk and Chairman of the Board
of Trustees Michael Eisenson ’77, the Horns have been transparent about their legal case since its onset in 2014. “Ms. Horn contacted President Falk and me in December of 2014 to tell us that she and Mr. Horn had been accused of violating rules in Norway regarding the employment of au pairs,” Eisenson said. “She kept us informed as the legal proceedings advanced, and contacted the President and me again immediately following the judgement in the trial
in Norway. Ms. Horn called again on Feb. 16 to indicate that she was stepping down from the Board of Trustees.” Horn’s resignation took effect 13 days after her conviction and sentencing were announced, but only a day after students researching the trustees for a Divest Williams project found and began circulating an English-language Norwegian article detailing the Horns’ conviction.
SEE HORN, p. 5
Applications to College CC approves Uncomfortable Learning as RSO S jump up 22 percent By KYLAR SMITH EXECUTIVE EDITOR
By ISAIAH KRUGMAN CONTRIBUTING WRITER This application season, the Office of Admission received a record-breaking 8577 applications for the class of 2021, a 22-percent increase in applications compared to last year. The College saw not only an increase in the size of the applicant pool but an increase in its diversity as well. “We also saw dramatic increases in applications from American students of color and international students,” Director of Admission Dick Nesbitt ’79 said. The Office of Admission has devoted more time to international recruitment, traveling further and for more time this cycle than in previous years. These efforts, led by the new Assistant Director for International Recruitment Misha Garg, have proven successful; 22 percent of applications came from international students, an increase from 17 percent last year. Changes in the College’s admissions requirements accompanied changes in the applicant pool. For the first time applications included the College Board’s redesigned SAT and lacked SAT Subject Tests, a previously required but now optional admissions supplement. “It’s likely that the change to our standardized test policy – dropping the subject test requirement – had the biggest impact on application numbers,” Nesbitt said. Eliminating the SAT Subject Test requirement removed another hoop that many prospective applicants were unwilling to jump through, especially if only required by a single school to which a student may apply, as many colleges and universities have dropped similar requirements in recent years. Applications from low-income students went up as well, resulting in more applicants applying for financial aid. The larger presence of low-income individuals in the applicant pool is the result of efforts by the Office of Admission to eliminate barriers that discourage lowincome persons from learning of or applying to the College.
The SAT and its Subjects Tests, the ACT, the Common Application and the College Board CSS financial aid form all harbor costs that many low-income, high-achieving students cannot bear. In addition to the costs, the complicated and often intimidating application process can prevent the College from connecting with lowincome students who are often unfamiliar with the admissions process. Consequently, the College has sought to eliminate financial barriers for those applying. The abandonment of the SAT Subject Test requirement was done with this concern in mind. In addition, the College has allowed students to submit screenshots and unofficial score reports to eliminate the cost of sending scores. The Office of Admission has been attempting to attract low-income students through pamphlets and mailings that demonstrate the College’s commitment to affordability and financial aid. The online “Quick Cost Estimator” reaffirms this commitment by providing students with a rough estimate of the cost of attendance given their financial background. The “Windows on Williams” program pays for low-income applicants’ travel to and from College for those would otherwise be unable to visit. The Office of Admission hopes to encourage admitted low-income students to attend by paying for the cost of travel to the College for Previews. Nesbitt stressed that the increase in diversity of applicants reaffirms the College’s previous commitments. “The goal this year is to build upon the successes of the last several classes in enhancing the socioeconomic diversity of the student body while maintaining the high standards of academic excellence and community-mindedness that characterize Williams,” Nesbitt said. “Attracting a broader and deeper applicant pool is the first step in achieving that goal.” USPS 684-6801 | 1ST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25
On Feb. 14, College Council (CC) voted to make Uncomfortable Learning (UL) a CC/Office of Student Life (OSL) recognized student organization (RSO). Now under the umbrella of CC, the group must be open to everyone and can no longer receive funding from anonymous donors, as it had previously done since its founding in 2014. The group must now submit a proposal for any of its potential sponsored events or speakers before the Finance Committee, which will present a recommendation for CC to vote on. Last year, the group garnered national attention after inviting several controversial speakers whose events were subsequently cancelled. In October, UL invited writer and outspoken critic of feminism Suzanne Venker to speak at the College, only to rescind the offer shortly thereafter. In February, when the group invited author John Derbyshire, a self-described “race realist.”
WHAT’S INSIDE
President Adam Falk himself The club currently only canceled the lecture, stating consists of Wood, the club’s in his all-campus email that previous leader who is cur“many of [Derbyshire’s] ex- rently studying away for his pressions clearly constitute junior year at Columbia, and hate speech.” Hank Lee ’19, who joined the Last March, in response club only this current year as to the controversy concerning UL, the College changed its policy regarding speakers brought to campus, mandating that only an RSO can bring speakers to campus. In addition, the College specified that student groups must report any funding they receive from nonZach Wood '18, president College sources. Though UL is now an RSO, the group’s mission, according to club president vice president. When the club Zach Wood ’18, is still the underwent review in the CC same: “to broaden the range meeting last week, Lee joined of dialogue on campus and the meeting to provide more spark debate.” information to CC members “My aim is to be delibera- before they voted.“We’re tive, decisive and receptive to open to student input, open constructive feedback,” Wood to anyone who wants to join said. “For speakers, the aim is and absolutely our goal is to to fulfill the mission.” bring in speakers who inform
and educate productively,” Lee said. “My main interest in getting involved in the club was to see more political conversation on campus and more conversation around issues that are challenging or issues that don’t get addressed super frequently,” he said. As a new member of the organization, Lee is looking forward to the future of the club rather of UL than fixating on the divisive incidents of its controversial past. “For me personally, I have not worried about the controversy element in the past, as someone who wasn’t part of the club last year,” Lee said. “Instead, what I’m thinking about it, is: Are we
“My aim is to be deliberate, decisive and receptive to constuctive feedback. For speakers, the aim is to fulfill the mission.”
SEE UL RETURNS, p. 5
WEB FARABOW '18 AND ALLEGRA SIMON '18 WIN THE CC PRESIDENCY BY A MORE THAN 300-VOTE MARGIN ... READ MORE ON PAGE 4
3 OPINIONS
A need for sanctuary in Williamstown
4 NEWS
Bal and Buckley reflect on their CC presidency
7 FEATURES
Professor Alan Hirsch grapples with false confessions
8 ARTS
"Accession Number" thrills at WCMA
12 SPORTS
Men's swimming trounces competition at NESCACs
MICHAEL GREEN/MANAGING EDITOR