RECORD THE WILLIAMS
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2019 VOL. CXXXIII, NO. 15 Tsay: a call to dismantle violent structures
Page 3
WSO “popcorn” thread turns 11 years old
Page 6
THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER AT WILLIAMS COLLEGE SINCE 1887
President instructs students to relocate memorial, citing fire safety Students had rebuilt the installation after a faculty member deconstructed parts of the original memorial By ARRINGTON LUCK NEWS EDITOR On Monday, students took down portions of an installation honoring Assistant Professor of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies Kai Green ’07 and Assistant Professor of English Kimberly Love in Hollander Hall at the request of President Maud Mandel, who cited fire code and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violations. Students first began placing the installation in Hollander on Feb. 9. On Feb. 13, Keith McPartland, associate professor of philosophy and chair of the Schapiro-Hollander users committee, deconstructed and moved parts of it after clarifying with Head of Campus Safety and Security (CSS) David Boyer and Manager of Safety and Environmental Compliance Frank Pekarski that the installation violated fire codes. Neither Boyer nor Pekarski, however, instructed McPartland to remove the installation. After the partial removal, students created an even larger memorial. They relocated parts of it after Mandel confirmed that the installation was in violation of “both state law and campus policy.” The original installation – composed of flowers, poems, copies of the Record, Feminist Wire articles, artwork and notes – spanned a hallway on the first floor of Hollander Hall and gave students an opportunity to express their solidarity with and support for the professors, who each cited institutional violence as the reason for taking leave before
SABRINE BRISMEUR/PHOTO EDITOR
Students rebuild the memorial in Hollander Hall after the original one was deconstructed by a faculty member. the start of the spring semester. The installation covered portions of the wall, though materials were also placed on the floor and the doors of the two professors. In an all campus email yesterday, Mandel explained that last week, senior staff decided that the memorial materials “weren’t impeding movement through Hollander and should be left undisturbed for a period of time,” yet that they “would eventually have to be moved.” The email continued, “Our plan was to al-
Students attend CC meeting dressed as Papa Smurf after cartoon character elected By ROSE HOUGLET NEWS EDITOR During the College Council (CC) elections last week, Papa Smurf received nine write-in votes for the class of 2021 representative – more votes than three of the students actually elected. In response, some students drafted a resolution that CC ultimately passed, outlined a “Blue New Deal” – which did not pass – and dressed up as Papa Smurf for the first CC meeting. Others expressed disapproval of such actions because it devalued CC’s purpose. John Murphy ’21, who originally created a Facebook event titled “DEMAND Papa Smurf be seated at CC” in the College’s meme page as a joke, found that 126 people had marked themselves as “Going.” “When I realized how much traction it had, I worked with WAFFLES [Williams Anarchists for Fun and Lighthearted Entertaining Surprises] and the meme page to create the final draft of the resolution which CC ended up passing,” he said. “ I also was one of a few individuals who drafted the Nine-Step-Plan known as the ‘Blue New Deal,’ which did not pass a vote but forced numerous members of CC to stifle their laughter as I read it out loud at Tuesday's meeting. I also dubbed myself and Onyeka Obi ’21 as co-presidents of Smurf SuperPAC Incorporated, a private sector organization based out of Carter House devoted to keeping Smurfs in office.” “A Resolution on Blue Democracy” was co-authored by WAFFLES, Surf Club and Frosh Revue and co-sponsored by Porter Johnson ’21, Andrew Trunsky ’20, Solly Kasab ’21 and Lance Ledet ’21. It held that CC fulfill five requests: “Recognize Papa Smurf as a force for political leadership on the Williams
campus; commend Papa Smurf for his ability to unite a diverse spectrum of students; designate the four Class of 2021 Representatives as ‘Papa Smurf Memorial Class of 2021 Representatives,’ a designation to be held until the year 2022; delineate an area of every meeting for the display of a ‘Papa Smurf Portrait,’ dutifully provided by sympathetic students; and hold a vote on Papa Smurf’s Nine-Step-Plan: A Blue New Deal.” Porter Johnson ’21, who wore red tights to the first CC meeting and co-sponsored the resolution that passed, had expected a meme-like candidate to win the spot for the class of 2021 representative. “Given that there were no self-nominations for ’21 representatives, and given how few people I saw actually putting their name out there, I fully expected a meme to outright win a spot on College Council. What did surprise me, however, was how few votes were actually needed,” he said. Other students were critical of the events. Abel Romero ’19, who formerly served as vice president for student affairs and class of 2019 representative, rejected the idea that Papa Smurf could be elected to CC. “To be elected, one must be a member of the student body here at Williams. I opposed the certification of the election of a former student during the Fall for this very reason, and I’m glad the committee acted responsibly this time around,” Romero said. While beginning with a humorous tone, Murphy saw his actions as a larger commentary on CC. “I see CC as a self-aggrandizing body that determines which activities of student clubs and coalitions have ‘worth’ to this campus; I also believe that many who run for positions on CC do continued on p. 5
low them to remain until we could discuss long-term options with students.” Pekarski said that while he and Boyer were both instructed not to move the materials, he informed McPartland that the installation had violated fire codes but did not explicitly ask McPartland to remove the materials. Acting as chair of the Schapiro-Hollander users committee, which works to adjudicate issues within the buildings, McPartland deconstructed parts of the memorial.
Some students expressed disaproval of McPartland’s decision. President Mandel ended yesterday’s all campus email with a call for unity. “I also believe Williams has what it takes to persevere and transcend its challenges to become a better place,” Mandel wrote. “In fact, I believe we have to. I’m grateful I’ll be working toward that goal in partnership with all of you.” To some students, Mandel’s calls for cooperation rang hollow. “I am highly critical of the fact
that President Mandel’s most recent email prioritizes the defense of Professor McPartland, rather than interrogating the biased and violent removal of the shrines that he enacted,” Minority Coalition co-President Tyler Tsay ’19 wrote. “He took it upon himself to reach out to CSS and EHS [Environmental Compliance], seemingly looking for any excuse to remove the materials; he took it upon himself to walk across to Hollander to remove the materials, even though senior adminis-
tration was already dealing with it directly with students in a much more appropriate manner. Even if he did not intend his actions as violence (and that is up for debate), they certainly were violent in their result.” On the morning of Feb. 13, Boyer reached out to Pekarski. “I contacted Frank Pekarski when I heard that he was reaching out trying to get the items moved,” Boyer said. “[I] was told that the items in Hollander Hall were a clear violation of the building/fire codes and that the items had to be removed from the hallway.” In an email to the Record, Pekarski confirmed that the installation, as it was originally constructed, was in violation of the fire code. Pekarski said he was told “that the memorial wasn't to be moved while things were sorted out,” and Boyer said that he was instructed “that the items were to remain and not be disturbed by anyone in CSS.” “At the end of our conversation it was not clear who was going to remove the items,” Boyer said. “I gave Frank Pekarski the name of professor Keith McPartland, who is our listed contact for building matters in Hollander.” Pekarski said that he told McPartland “there were fire code issues,” though he noted that he “didn't tell [McPartland] to remove the materials.” McPartland contacted Boyer that day. “I talked with Professor Keith McPartland prior to the items being moved and told him about my conversation with continued on p. 5
Trans* Inclusion Committee releases “Communications Best Practices” guidelines By JEONGYOON HAN EXECUTIVE EDITOR On Feb. 11, the Trans* Inclusion Committee (TIC) released a set of recommended guidelines titled “Communications Best Practices.” The best practices are a collection of suggestions that TIC has created for trans* and gender-variant inclusive language for in-person conversations and written exchanges. TIC, which is housed under the Office of Institutional Diversity and Equity and includes representatives from various offices at the College, rolled out the guidelines as part of its broader effort to create an “inclusive environment for trans* and gender-variant members of the Williams community,” specifically for institutional and procedural elements of the College. Librarian Emery Shriver, co-chair of TIC with Assistant Registrar Amanda Turner, said that the recommendations also come in light of TIC recognizing communication’s impact in facilitating micro-aggressions towards those who are trans* or gender-variant. “A lot of what I would maybe call ‘micro-aggressions’ come not from intentional transphobia, but a lack of education, so we thought it was important for people to be aware of ways in way they can be inclusive,” Shriver said. “It’s kind of breaking the really entrenched formality of a school like Williams and opening people’s eyes to the different ways that they can, with a slight
change, be that much more inclusive in how they’re communicating with people.” Turner said that such efforts are critical in allowing for a culture of “learning and asking” for the College community. Shriver also highlighted that giving individuals more agency in using pronouns or honorifics hits at issues of social norms at the College surrounding pronoun usage. “That’s what I think Williams has trouble with in general: being comfortable with not knowing, or being wrong, or being com-
mittee could achieve this fall. “[TIC] decided that this was something small, but very important, a nice step for creating inclusion,” Turner said. The guidelines offer tips and suggestions for those in certain contexts. For example, instead of using binary gender honorifics – “Mr.” or “Ms.” – for individual or group communication, TIC suggests not using any honorifics, using an inclusive honorific, such as “Mx.” or asking people’s preferences. Other suggestions including making a habit to share pronouns, if will-
“It’s ... opening people’s eyes to the different ways that they can, with a slight change, be that much more inclusive in how they're communicating with people.” Emery Shriver
Co-chair of Trans* Inclusion Committee fortable with discomfort,” Shriver said, referring to instances of misgendering people. “When somebody challenges you on your privilege, that’s okay. You should feel discomfort.” Turner said that being more conscientious of the ways in which members of the College address others – in web content, invitations, emails, classroom settings or name tags – is a crucial step to creating an inclusive space for all people at the College. Releasing a list of practices was what TIC identified as a concrete objective that the Com-
ing, when introducing oneself, or giving people the option to list their name and pronouns as they prefer on name tags for inperson events. TIC spent the fall of 2018 collecting recommendations based on members’ own encounters with problems of incorrect pronoun usage in written or verbal communication. Many of the recommendations result from instances in which offices or departments at the College have misgendered people or used language that does not encompass trans* or gender-variant
people. For example, Turner pointed out that some course descriptions in the Course Catalog and job descriptions posted online use only “he” or “she” pronouns. Turner, who is also the assistant registrar for the College, said the hope is that various offices at the College can use the recommendations to assess questions of inclusivity. Certain departments have begun to take such steps: The Registrar’s Office, PeopleSoft, GLOW and Office of Information and Technology have been cognizant of such considerations, with introduction for members of the College to list preferred campus names in 2017 and the option to list pronoun preferences in 2018. With these best practices and the release of the all-gender bathroom map on the College’s website, Shriver said the hope is to raise awareness of inclusion through aspects of College life that might go unnoticed for some. “We communicate with people at Williams in so many different ways – with parents, with alums, with students, with staff, with faculty,” Shriver said. “And there are a lot of things to consider, not just the one-on-one meeting somebody for the first time [scenarios] or introducing somebody. I think the [initiatives were] a way to move forward a little bit – the inclusive practices… Let’s take an extra step – not a huge step – but something that is accessible and that can, I think, make a big difference by just making small changes.”
WHAT’S INSIDE 3 OPINIONS
7 FEATURES
9 ARTS
12 SPORTS
On the importance of collective activism
Student veterans reflect on time at the College
A conversation with OSHUN
Kristi Kirshe ’17 debuts for USA Rugby
USPS 684-6801 1st CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILLIAMSTOWN, MA PERMIT NO. 25