W W W .W E STERNGAZETTE.C A • @UW OGAZETTE
Breaking up is hard to do We test the best breakup spots on campus so you don’t have to. >> pg. 4
thegazette Jason honey since 1906
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2013
TODAY high 0 low -7
TOMORROW high -3 low -9
CANADA’S ONLY DAILY STUDENT NEWSPAPER • FOUNDED 1906
VOLUME 107, ISSUE 45
Dalhousie students call for oil divestment Whelan says divestment at Western not a priority for USC Megan Devlin NEWS EDITOR The Dalhousie Student Union unanimously passed a motion last Wednesday which calls on the university’s Board of Governors to end investment in the fossil fuel industry. Divestment is a movement gaining momentum across North America that endeavors to limit fossil fuel companies’ monstrous economic power by ceasing investment in them. “At Divest Dalhousie we believe it’s morally wrong for an institution of higher learning to invest in the destruction of the planet,” James Hutt, spokesperson for Divest Dal, said. Western also invests heavily in the fossil fuel industry. Western’s pension fund has approximately $66-million invested in the energy sector, spread across various stock portfolios, according to the 2012 Pension Investment Annual Report. Of this money, over $10-million is invested in seven big oil companies across various funds. The university holds shares in Shell, Exxon, Chevron, Suncor, BP, EOG Resources and Enbridge. However, University Students’ Council president Pat Whelan said he has not heard a call from students to take a stance on oil divestment. “I think there’s some students interested in doing it, but I don’t think it’s a widespread belief,” Whelan said. Whelan said his USC tries to
At Divest Dal we believe it’s morally wrong for an institution of higher learning to invest in the destruction of the planet —James Hutt
Spokesperson for Divest Dal
focus on issues that directly affect students while they’re studying at Western. Oil divestment wasn’t on his radar as a high priority. “I think that every student government needs to respond to their student body […]. I guess the situation at Dalhousie is a little different than it is here,” Whelan said. “I know that our priorities are really focusing on academic issues, support for students on campus, financial aid, things that are directly affecting life for students,” he continued. Hutt said divestment is incredibly important when considering the moral implications of investing in the oil industry. “We’re going to a university that is a leader in sustainability, but we’re investing in the very industries that are ensuring the catastrophic effects of climate change,” Hutt said. Dalhousie’s endowment fund is $411-million strong. However, since its Board of Governors doesn’t publish its finances, it is currently
Bill Wang GAZETTE
ENDING OIL INVESTMENT. Divestment motions, such as the one passed at Dalhousie last week, say it is a conflict of interests for institutions of higher learning to invest in industries that destroy the environment. Western has over $10-million invested in the fossil fuel industry, but USC president Pat Whelan says divestment is not a USC priority.
unknown how much or in what these dollars are invested. Hutt explained one of the goals of the motion was to make the finances the Dalhousie Endowment Fund public knowledge. The other goals included divesting fully from fossil fuel companies within four years. Hutt stressed it was a conflict of interest for institutions like Dalhousie who claimed to be leaders
in sustainability to invest in ecologically harmful industries like oil. Whelan, however, explained he believed broader social issues like oil divestment were best left to other levels of government besides the student council. Should the issue be brought to council, he said, he would advise councillors to focus on the more pressing issues to the student body such as support services for
students, the educational experience, and the cost of attending university. A Divest Western Facebook page has been started, and it currently has just under 100 likes. “If it is wrong to wreck the climate, then it is wrong to profit from that wreckage,” the page’s description reads — referring to the profits investors can reap from holding shares in oil companies.
SOGS sued for defamation by member Richard Raycraft NEWS EDITOR Western’s Society of Graduate Students (SOGS) is being sued by one of its members for defamation and breach of contract. Eric Sadowski, a PhD student in Health and Rehabilitative Sciences, is seeking damages in the amount of $200,000 for breach of contract and $300,000 for defamation. “The allegations surround an ad-hoc committee of SOGS which tabled a report condemning Sadowkski to SOGS council,” a press release Sadowski sent to The Gazette read. Sadowski alleges this report was defamatory and harmed his reputation. The release also
said that SOGS is noted in default for failure to file a statement of defence, and that SOGS council is “in disarray.” None of the allegations have been proven in court. Sadowski is seeking damages from SOGS president Kevin Godbout and 14 others, all current or former students at Western. Godbout declined to comment in depth, except to say that SOGS was prepared to defend itself in court. “It’s not appropriate for me to comment in any depth on the matter. The matter is before the courts,” he said. “What I can tell you is that we’re taking steps, and our defence counsel is taking steps, to have the
note in default set aside and we expect this to happen as a matter of routine.” “SOGS intends to vigorously defend its claim, or the claim against ourselves, and it’s our position that it has no merit whatsoever,” he said. The allegations come following an attempt to remove Sadowski from his position as chair of the SOGS Health Plan Committee following a number of disputes between himself and other members of SOGS. According to Sadowski’s statement of claim, a report by an investigative SOGS committee recommended that “Mr. Sadowski be removed from the HPC for a period of six months,” and that
“Mr. Sadowski has proven he cannot maintain a diplomatic position and ensure the proper function of a committee, and therefore, should not be in a position of authority.” According Sadowski’s statement of claim, “This report is generally defamatory because it is specifically intended to attack Sadowski’s character and professional status within the health policy community and was aimed to lower his reputation in the eyes of his peers and, in general, at UWO.” “I just want to clear my name and I want democracy to work properly,” Sadowski told The Gazette. “I feel as if I have been treated unfairly.” The investigative committee was struck following two incidents
involving Sadowski. In the first, Sadowski and Ayo Abiola, vice-president student services at SOGS and a defendant in the lawsuit, allegedly had a disagreement about the committee procedure at a HPC meeting. Sadowski asked Abiola to leave the meeting, according to the statement of claim. In the second, Sadowski allegedly made unauthorized modification to an online draft of a SOGS bylaw, which was a work in progress. The committee investigated from November 2012 to August 2013, when its recommendations to remove Sadowski were defeated before SOGS council. The statement of claim was filed shortly after.