w w w .w e sterngazette.c a • @uw ogazette
Butter fingers Western smacks down Windsor Lancers 56–35 >> pg. 7
thegazette Reporting on ourselves since 1906
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
today high 10 low 4
tomorrow high 8 low 3
canada’s only Daily Student Newspaper • founded 1906
Volume 106, Issue 31
Fearnall proposes major USC overhaul New structure may see presidential running mates Alex Carmona News Editor The structure of the University Students’ Council can be confusing to even the most politicallysavvy student, but there are many students who have put in the work necessary to understand the complex web of commissioners, coordinators, councillors and vice-presidents that make up our student government here at Western. And if this is the case for you, hopefully you’re not studied out, because it all might be changing. At last week’s council meeting, USC President Adam Fearnall brought forward an informal proposal that would radically revamp the structure of the USC’s executive branch. For the uninitiated, the USC executive is made up of five non-voting vice-presidents, each charged with overseeing one of five governmental portfolios—finance, communications, university affairs, campus issues and student events. Under the current system, these five members are elected by the voting members of council. This gives council complete control over who can be elected to these positions that are open to all students. Fearnall hopes to change this. Under the proposal, which has yet to be finalized, the president will instead directly hire four of the five traditional vice-presidents.
The fifth, university affairs, will be transformed into a new position, currently titled ‘executive vice-president,’ and will run for election alongside a candidate for the USC presidency. This will, in essence, require each presidential candidate to find a running mate—a system familiar to anyone who follows U.S. politics. If the proposal goes through in its current form, the USC president will be afforded a significant amount of power by gaining the power to pick the executive board. “This will provide a really strong support system for the president, and the vice-president, which would definitely strengthen their ability to accomplish their goals,” Fearnall said. However, he stressed the change would also serve to empower the voting members of council. By bringing the whole executive board under the control of the president, this will present council with a unified executive agenda that they can choose to accept or challenge. “We want to see councillors running with their own agendas, and to see the negotiation between the presidential ticket’s agenda, and the council’s agenda happen on the council floor. What we’re trying to do is disperse the amount of decision-making power throughout the organization into a number of areas so it’s more clearly defined what council has
Courtesy of Jeremy Santucci
purview over,” Fearnall explained. “At the end of the day, the president isn’t able to move unless given direction by council. I think there’s been a sense, in the past, that the presidential vision automatically goes, and what I’m trying to say is that it doesn’t necessarily just go. It’s not necessarily one that council has to agree with. We want to see that debate, negotiation and discussion, and to get to a point where everyone knows what the agenda is so that the or-
ganization can choose whether or not to go off and push that agenda.” Jordan Coop, president of the Faculty of Information and Media Studies Students’ Council, said he hopes the change will encourage students from outside the traditional USC circle to seek the hired vice-presidential positions. “The current structure, whereby the council elects vicepresidents, has a tendency to be slightly aristocratic—that is to say,
there’s a propensity to favour candidates who have long-standing clout with the USC,” Coop said. “Hiring executives—although […] less democratic—might, in fact, provide more opportunities through which outsiders can penetrate the notorious ‘USC Bubble.’ But, ultimately, in order for this initiative to work, I think a necessary cultural shift must ensue— council members will have to run with student advocacy in mind, instead of their résumés.”
Frankenstorm haunts London residents Cam Smith News Editor
Andrei Calinescu GAZETTE
It’s going to be a wet and windy couple of days for London residents. The remnants of Hurricane Sandy—dubbed ‘Frankenstorm’— are due to pass through Southern Ontario early this week. The adverse weather promises to bring heavy rain, and winds that could gust up to 90km/h, presenting potential flooding dangers and power outages. “[The flooding danger] depends on how the rainfall takes place. If it’s 50 millimetres and the duration is over 24 to 48 hours, it shouldn’t be too much for us to manage,” Tom Copeland, manager
of wastewater and drainage engineering for the City of London, explained. “On the other hand, if it’s 50 millimetres over the course of a couple of hours, that will cause us problems, and it may cause sewer backups and basement flooding.” While heavy rain may put pressure on the water systems, the more pressing problem is the potential for dangerously powerful gusts. “The issue we’re most concerned about is high winds,” Copeland said. “With that we could get fallen limbs and fallen trees, which could result in power outages.” For this eventuality, emergency response teams are getting ready to provide aid if needed, including
charitable organizations like the Salvation Army. “We’ve been making preparations for some form of emergency response,” Perron Goodyear, divisional director of emergency and disaster services for the Salvation Army, explained. “We’re hoping for the best and preparing for the worst. We are certainly preparing in case things get very bad.” Like Copeland, Goodyear anticipates high winds as being the most problematic aspect of the storm. “If the trees bring down power lines, it could put people without power, and we might have to do some emergency feeding.” >> see storm pg.3