1
Was the LGBT Movement Infiltrated by Marxists, Communists and Fabian Socialists for the Purpose of Forming a “Parallel Political Movement” to Help Advance a “Marxist Revolution” in the United States of America? by Nolan McFadden Please allow me to preface this study with the following thoughts. As authentic, Biblebelieving Christians, we are called to win others to our LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST (Matthew 28:19-20, Mark 16:15-16, Acts 1:8; 26:18, II Corinthians 5:17-21). We believe, as is taught in the Scriptures of truth, that our loving God wants “all” people to be “saved” (meaning to be “born again”) to a “new life” in CHRIST JESUS. Our God also desires that “all” people come to the “knowledge of the truth” in the Scriptures of truth (I Timothy 2:1-6). The word “all” in our Bible text certainly includes homosexuals and marxists. Subsequently, as followers of JESUS, we are not called to follow or lead others on a path of being militant or pugnacious toward others (including toward homosexuals or toward marxists). Rather, following the example of our LORD JESUS, let us follow and teach others to walk on the path of God’s peace through faith in and obedience to JESUS CHRIST and His teachings (John 14:27; 16:33, Romans 5:1). Let us keep in mind that JESUS did not come to “destroy” the lives of others. Instead, JESUS came to “love” and “save” people from their sins and self-deceptions (Luke 9:52-56, John 8:31-36). JESUS, our example, came to save and help people, not to harm people. May we ponder the fact that, without the grace, mercy, and intervention of our loving God, you and I could be walking on a path of error and self-deception. Therefore, while not departing from the “mind” and compassion of OUR LORD, let’s evaluate these erroneous movements. Was the marxist ideology a major component in the founding of the twentieth-century Homosexual Social Movements? Is the current LGBT Movement continuing to be influenced by marxists and marxism? It was former F. B. I. agent and scholar W. Cleon Skousen (1913-2006) who wrote the book entitled The NAKED COMMUNIST which was published in 1958. In his book Mr. Skousen warned, “It is a terrible and awesome thing when a man sets out to create all other men in his own image. Such became the goal and all consuming ambition of Karl Marx…Marx surveyed the world and dreamed of the day when the whole body of humanity could be forced into a gigantic social image which conformed completely to Marx’s dream of a perfect society. To achieve his goal, Marx required two things: First, the total annihilation of all opposition, the downfall of all existing governments, all economies and all societies. “Then,” he wrote, “I shall stride through the wreckage a creator.” The second thing he needed was a new kind of human being. He visualized a regimented breed of Pavlovian men whose minds could be triggered into immediate action by signals from their masters. He wanted a race of men who would no longer depend upon free will, ethics, morals or conscience for guidance. Perhaps, without quite realizing it, Marx was setting out to create a race of human beings conditioned to think like criminals [marxists]…” “…Today this breed of criminally conditioned man walks the earth in sufficient numbers to conquer countries or continents, to change laws and boundaries, to decree war or peace. He might well be called Homo-Marxian – the Marxist Man…Being without
2
morals, he approaches all things in a direct, uncomplicated manner. Self-preservation is given as the sole justification for his own behavior,…Marxist Man has convinced himself that nothing is evil which answers the call of expediency. He has released himself from all the confining restraints of honor and ethics which mankind has previously tried to use as a basis for harmonious human relations…He is out to rule the world…” (1) It was the father of marxism, socialism and communism, Karl Marx (1818-1883), who declared, “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” (2) Amazingly, this is precisely what the fallen angel known as “Lucifer” aspired to do as revealed in Isaiah 14:12-16 (KJV). Lucifer, also called “the Devil,” and “Apollyon” (meaning “the Destroyer” - Revelation 9:11 or “Satan” – Revelation 12:7-9), desires to exalt himself in place of God and destroy the works of God and the lives of men. Perhaps we have identified the source from whom Karl Marx found inspiration for his marxist ideology. Decades later, after followers of the teachings of Karl Marx known as the Bolsheviks had seized power, overthrown Russia and murdered many people, another devoted follower of the tenets of Karl Marx rose to power in the Soviet Union. His name was Joseph Stalin (1878-1953). Stalin became a Devil-led, brutal mass murderer of Christians, Jews and conservatives who refused to convert to marxism and communism. During his reign of terror, Stalin was responsible for the murders of millions of people within the former Soviet empire. In addition, Stalin sent assassins, weapons, supplies and advisors to help start wars and kill many more in other countries to advance the cause of “world revolution.” With regard to Marx and his Satanically deceived followers, we cannot help but ponder the words of our Savior. JESUS said to the spiritually deceived, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” (John 8:44) In his book UNDERSTANDING THE TIMES author David Noebel reported about Stalin, “…in his youth, he [Stalin] survived numerous bank robberies committed in support of the Marxist party, and escaped from a Siberian prison camp – but he also proved to be a dictator of the hardest, most unforgiving order. After V.I. Lenin’s death in 1924, Stalin and two other men grappled for control of the USSR, and Stalin won the battle at a cost of numerous lives. Officials ideologically opposed to him usually wound up in obscure prison camps or facing firing squads. Once in power, Stalin incorporated his methodology of terror [meaning a real marxist terrorist] into his government policies [thereby creating government sponsored “State terrorism”]. Approximately fourteen million peasants [“the proletariat” to whom he claimed to serve] died prematurely under Stalin’s regime from 1930-1937. His World War II pact with Adolph Hitler and his blatant unwillingness to honor such pacts or to act as a trustworthy ally provides us with a shining example of the practical consequences of adhering to the Marxist belief that the ends justify the means. Indeed, Stalin’s entire career serves as a horrifying reminder of the actions which can be justified by a Marxist/Leninist worldview.” (3) Following the “shining” teachings of his hero Karl Marx, Stalin became a liar, thief and mass-murderer, a true criminal in the service of the Kremlin. But why should we expect anything better from his life? Stalin was a true, committed, Devil-serving marxist/communist. Joseph Stalin, an atheist, believed that there was no higher power than the State (statism). From his deluded perspective, all people existed to serve the government and
3
the Party. Stalin despised Christianity, the Holy Bible, the Christian family unit, religious freedom, capitalism, America and the Constitution of the United States of America. Stalin and the marxists/communists aimed for the destruction and overthrow of all of the above. In his time Joseph Stalin proclaimed, “America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: Its patriotism, Its morality, and Its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.” (4) To this end, the twentieth-century Soviets developed and pursued a strategy for the internal collapse of the United States. They partnered with the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA), Fabian socialists and “progressives” (meaning covert marxists) to accomplish these objectives within the United States. The strategy included infiltration of all institutions in the United States (education, government, labor, media, entertainment, national security, churches, non-profit organizations, etc.) to bring about a “marxist revolution” from within. David Noebel pointed out, “Under communism, the Marxist believes, all class distinctions will be abolished. “The ultimate goal of the class struggle waged by the proletariat is to abolish capitalist society with its inevitable antagonism between classes, and to create the classless communist society...” “…Engels sums up the problem when he writes, “…the whole history of mankind…has been a history of class struggles, contests between exploiting and exploited, ruling and oppressed classes;…the history of these class struggles forms a series of evolution in which, now-a-days, a stage has been reached where the exploited and oppressed class – the proletariat – cannot attain its emancipation from the sway of the exploiting and ruling class – the bourgeoisie – without at the same time, and once and for all, emancipating society at large from all exploitation, oppression, class-distinctions and class struggles.” 49…” (5) Furthermore, Noebel observed, “…The Fundamentals of Marxist-Leninist Philosophy proclaims, “The victory of communism on a world scale will provide the necessary material and intellectual preconditions for the merging of nations. A communist economy developing according to a single [centralized] plan and securing a degree of economic integration never known before will gradually be formed [i.e. incremental “change” Fabian socialism] throughout the world. There will emerge A COMMON [MARXIST] MORAL CODE [capitalization added] which will fully absorb all that is best [“best” according to who?] in the character of each nation. There will be a common language, a common means of communication for all people. Mankind will become one, united, fraternal community completely free of antagonisms.” 51 (6) [i.e. Mikhail Gorbachev’s “Perestroika” – the restructuring of communism to be made palatable, global socialism for all nations] Of a kindred spirit, Saul Alinsky (1909-1972), an American sociologist, worked closely with the marxists to advance the same cause of “cultural revolution” and destroying capitalism in America. Alinsky wrote Reveille for Radicals (Rules for Radicals) in which he advocated: 1) political nihilism 2) methods of deception 3) re-naming concepts of marxism as “progressivism,” “social justice,” etc. 4) “the crisis strategy,” - a strategy to destroy capitalism 5) how to seize power 6) advancing cultural revolution. Writing about Saul Alinsky in the booklet entitled Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution The Alinsky Model author David Horowitz noted that, “…his [Alinsky’s] entire life was devoted to organizing a revolution in America to destroy a system he regarded as oppressive and
4
unjust. By profession he was a “community organizer,” the same term employed by his most famous disciple, Barack Obama, to describe himself.” (7) Moreover, Mr. Horowitz observed, “Infiltrating the institutions of American society and government – something the “counter-cultural” radicals of the 1960’s were reluctant to do – was Alinsky’s modus operandi. While Tom Hayden and Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin were confronting Lyndon Johnson’s Pentagon and creating riots at the Democratic convention, Alinsky’s organizers were insinuating themselves into Johnson’s War on Poverty program and directing federal funds into their own organizations and causes.” (8) Keep in mind that Saul Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer (one of the titles for the fallen angel known as “Satan” – Isaiah 14:12, Revelation 12:7-9). On the dedication page of Rules for Radicals we read, “Lest we forget, an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.” (9) Concerning this “acknowledgment” Mr. Horowitz pointed out, “Thus Alinsky begins his text by telling readers exactly what a [Marxist] radical is. He is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer.” (10) We are reminded what our LORD JESUS said in John 10:10. Speaking about the Devil’s false teacher and ravening wolf in sheep’s clothing, JESUS warned, “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I (JESUS) am come that they might have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.” To the marxist, whether he or she goes by the title “progressive,” “moderate” or “liberal,” the most important weapon is DECEPTION. The end game justifies the deceptive means. Lying, deceiving or falsely accusing others is a non-issue to those who believe “the revolution” is everything and that they are not accountable to God. As the apostle Paul proclaimed, “Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit,; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: THERE IS NO FEAR OF GOD BEFORE THEIR EYES.” (Romans 3:13-18) David Horowitz observed, “The most basic principle of Alinsky’s advice to [marxist] radicals is to lie to their opponents and disarm them by pretending to be moderates and liberals.” (11) Adding, “That is why when partisans of the left go into battle, they set out to destroy their opponents by stigmatizing them as “racists,” “sexists,” “homophobes” and “Islamophobes.” It is also why they so often pretend to be what they are not (“liberals” for example) and rarely say what they mean. Deception for them is a military tactic in a war that is designed to eliminate the enemy.” (12) Regarding the marxist strategy of using mass deception in order to help destroy a “capitalist” nation from within, David Horowitz declared, “In The 18th Brumaire, Marx himself summed up the [marxist] radical’s passion by invoking a comment of Goethe’s Mephistopheles: “Everything that exists deserves to perish.” The essence of what it means to be a [marxist] radical is thus summed up in Alinsky’s praise for Satan: to be willing to destroy the values, structures and institutions that sustain the society in which we live. The many names of Satan are also a model for the way [marxist] radicals camouflage their agendas by calling themselves at different times Communists,
5
socialists, new leftists, liberals, social justice activists and most consistently progressives. My parents, who were card-carrying Communists, never referred to themselves as Communists but always as “progressives,” as did their friends and political comrades. The “Progressive Party” was created by the Communist Party to challenge Harry Truman in the 1948 election because he opposed the spread of Stalin’s empire. The Progressive Party was led by Roosevelt’s vice president, Henry Wallace, and was the vehicle chosen by the Communists to lead their followers out of the Democratic Party, which they had joined during the “popular front” of the 1930’s. The Progressives rejoined the Democrats during the McGovern campaign of 1972 and with the formation of a hundred-plus member Progressive Caucus in the [federal government] congressional party and the ascension of Barack Obama to the presidency have become its most important political force.” (13) Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov was a former high-ranking KGB officer in the Soviet Union (USSR). In 1970 Mr. Bezmenov escaped to the West. For years Yuri Bezmenov gave informative lectures about the goals, strategies and tactics of the KGB, marxists and communists. Yuri was trained in ideological subversion and psychological warfare. Bezmenov said that marxist infiltrators follow four stages in order to destroy a nation, incite a “revolution” and overthrow a capitalist government from within. They are: 1) Demoralization 2) Destabilization 3) Create a crisis to incite the revolution 4) Normalization after the leftist government has been established Decades ago, Bezmenov stated in an televised interview with G. Edward Griffin that much of this agenda has already been accomplished in the United States of America. (14) Moreover, in The NAKED COMMUNIST former F. B. I. agent W. Cleon Skousen presented a 45 point list of actions the marxists and communists were doing in his time to subvert America from within the nation. Subsequently, much of what has occurred since 1958 in the United States closely matches the data in his book. Consider points 17-27 and 40. Notice specifically points 25-26 and 40. Skousen wrote, “17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks. 18. Gain control of all student newspapers. 19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack. 20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy making positions. 21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures. 22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.” 23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. 24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press. 25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
6
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.” 40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity, masturbation and easy divorce.” (15) Another relevant, valuable resource for research is the book toward SOVIET AMERICA by William Z. Foster. Mr. Foster was a National Chairman of the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA). This book was first published in 1932 and is the blueprint for the conquest and takeover of America by marxists and communists by means of inciting a “proletarian revolution and the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat.” Regarding this book Francis Walter observed, “”…his [Foster’s] every word had Moscow’s approval, or he would not long have remained the head of the Moscow-directed American communist apparatus.” (16) Aiming to “emancipate” Christian women from Christian marriage, family and morality in order to live according to Marxist amorality, William Foster wrote, “The boasted American home, enslaving the woman through her economic inferiority and her children, makes her dependent on her husband. On all sides she confronts medieval sex taboos, assiduously cultivated by the church, State and bourgeois moralists.” (17) It is very significant that in the book toward SOVIET AMERICA William Foster presented a specific list of “organizations” that were to be “liquidated” and “dissolved” under the dictatorship of the Proletariat following a marxist/communist revolution and takeover of America. Foster referred to these organizations as “political props of the bourgeois rule.” It is apparent by his comments that Mr. Foster viewed these organizations as including people who, in his time, would have opposed a marxist/communist revolution and takeover of America. The organizations to be targeted certainly includes Christians, conservatives, veterans and owners of businesses. Foster proclaimed, “…Likewise, will be dissolved all other organizations that are political props of the bourgeois rule, including chambers of commerce, employers’ associations, rotary clubs [owners of businesses], American Legion [veterans], Y. M. C. A. [Christians], and such fraternal orders as the Masons, Odd Fellows, Elks, Knights of Columbus, etc.” (18) Mr. Foster quoted from the Program of the Communist International, “…The victorious proletariat utilizes the conquest of power as a lever of economic revolution, i. e., the revolutionary transformation of the property relations of capitalism into relations of the Socialist mode of production. The starting point of this great economic revolution is the expropriation of the landlords and capitalists, i. e. the conversion of the monopolistic property of the bourgeoisie into the property of the proletarian State.” 1 After providing for the emergency defense and provisioning requirements, the first steps of an American Workers’ and Farmers’ government, which is the dictatorship of the proletariat, will be directed towards the revolutionary nationalization or socialization of the large privatelyowned and State capitalist undertakings. In Industry, transport and communication, this will mean the immediate taking over by the State of all large factories, mines and power plants, together with all municipal and State industries; the whole transport services of railroads, waterways, airways, electric car lines, bus lines, etc.; the entire communication organization, including telegraphs, telephones, post office, radio, etc. In agriculture it will involve the early confiscation of the large landed estates in town and country, including
7
church property, together with their buildings, factories, live stock, etc. and also the whole body of forests, mineral deposits, lakes, rivers, etc. [SOUND FAMILIAR? I.E. AGENDA 21, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, ETC.] In finance it will mean the nationalization of the banking system and its concentration around a central State bank;…” (19) Now, compare the 1932 list of people and organizations who were to be targeted by the Marxists/communists following a marxist/communist revolution and takeover of America in Foster’s book toward SOVIET AMERICA to the lists of kinds of people and organizations now to be regarded as dangerous “extremists,” “dissidents” and “potential terrorists” and to be targeted by the present Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other federal and state agencies and you will be shocked. The new federal government “lists” also target Christians, conservatives, veterans and owners of businesses. These “lists” include people and organizations most likely to oppose a marxist/communist revolution and takeover of America. THE SIMILARITIES ARE BEYOND CHILLING! For example, let’s examine three reports demonstrating a distinct kind of bias and hatred from those working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directed toward Bible-believing Christians, conservatives and freedom-loving people. The end result of these DHS reports is the vilification of targeted groups. The reports are: 1) The “Assessment” report issued 7 April 2009 by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (20) 2) The January 30, 2012 DHS report entitled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008,” Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (21) 3) The 20 February 2009 Missouri State Highway Patrol document – MIAC Strategic Report – “The Modern Militia Movement” (22) In these documents there is obvious bias, religious profiling and political profiling found. We need only obtain answers to three questions to discover what occurred at these agencies: 1) From whom did the apparent anti-Christian, anti-conservative bias observed in these reports come? 2) What are the political beliefs and/or religious beliefs of these authors? 3) Who was the target of their bias? Do you remember the “Assessment” issued 7 April 2009 by the Department of Homeland Security which served to politicize national security and law-enforcement? Do you recall how those who believe in “end times prophecies” and a coming “one world government” were falsely portrayed in this report? They were lumped together with and falsely portrayed as “rightwing extremists,” “white supremacists,” “Antigovernment,” part of “the militia movement,” or part of “rightwing terrorist groups.” In fact, according to this “Assessment,” those who are against any of the following: gun control efforts; free trade agreements; abortion; inter-racial crimes; same-sex marriage; or illegal immigration were lumped together with and falsely portrayed with the previously mentioned five titles/labels. (23) Notice that this list includes being against “same-sex marriage” as a belief embraced by those who are now to be targeted by the DHS and falsely labeled “extremists,” “suspects” and “potential terrorists.” Thus, this list includes beliefs held by Bible-believing Christians and all other political opponents of those advancing a new, common, marxist morality and new marxist laws. It is interesting to note that in Revelation 12:9-10 “the Devil” (Satan) is called “the accuser of
8
our brethren.” It would make sense that his anti-Bible, anti-Christian, marxist spiritual children would do likewise in the last days. Well, you’ll be glad to know that this author is, in fact, not a rightwing extremist (or a leftwing extremist), a white supremacist, anti-government, a member of a “rightwing militia,” or a member of a “rightwing terrorist group.” I do, however, believe that end time Bible prophecies are 100% true and accurate. I do believe in a literal 2nd coming of JESUS, and the truths set forth in this book. I am against anarchism, marxism, fascism, totalitarianism, despotism, tyranny, unrighteous laws, and government abuse of authority (Isaiah 10:1). Furthermore, I have no intentions, whatsoever, of ceasing to believe these biblical truths by means of anti-Christian, anti-Bible, left-wing (or any other wing) government intimidation, government torture, government “reeducation” camps or government sponsored false propaganda. Keep in mind that this false report was only “one of a series of intelligence assessments” sent out to “...federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials...” This demonically inspired “Assessment,” loaded with false stereotypes, created such a public outcry that the DHS found it necessary to apologize to veterans who were offended. But, to date, a public apology has not been given by the DHS to Bible-believing Christians. Why? Could there come a time in our nation when Bible-believing Christians will be portrayed as “dissidents,” “extremists” a “threat” to national security, or “enemies of the state?” It has already gotten to the point in the U.S.A. that if you believe strongly about anything, except marxism, you are now regarded as a possible threat to the new government. Yet, the false portrayals and false propaganda of the new regime have continued. In January 2012 a new, revealing DHS report emerged. It is important to note that profiles based on the religious and political beliefs of Bible-believing Christians are presented as categories of “ideological motivation” for terrorism in the January 30, 2012 DHS report entitled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008,” Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (24). A very real and dangerous bias against Bible-believing Christians is clearly demonstrated on pages nine and ten of the report which includes quotes from “Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism-United States report compiled by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (Miller, Smarick, and Simone, 2011).” In this report, the following beliefs are portrayed as the “ideological motivation” for terrorism in the United States: “believe that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack…”; “believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism…”; “be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”; “anti-global”; “suspicious of centralized federal authority”; “reverent of individual liberty”; “believe in conspiracy theories…”; “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists),”; “forcibly insert religion into the political sphere (e.g., those who seek to politicize religion…”; “supported political movements for autonomy…”; “antiabortion”; “anti-Catholic”; anti-nuclear”; “anti-Castro.” This report serves to vilify millions of people viewed as political opponents of the new regime and causes them to
9
be regarded as “suspects” in the New (totalitarian) America. A convenient, superficial disclaimer is found at the beginning of this report. However, statements in the report clearly contradict the disclaimer and indicate intent to influence DHS decisions and policymaking. Their aim is to “support policymakers in developing prevention efforts” and “provide timely guidance on how to disrupt terrorist networks,…” Also, note that the authors use the term “anti-Catholic” in place of “anti-Christian” or “anti-Protestant.” Is this report influenced by marxist bias? Remember the data from the writings of FBI scholar W. Cleon Skousen and former Director of the FBI J. Edgar Hoover? Do the new DHS lists match the data? Of special note is how the label “fundamentalists” is used in this DHS report. This helps to reveal the presuppositions, beliefs and motives of the authors. It is implied that the beliefs of all categories of fundamentalists (including Christian, Jewish, and Muslim) have “ideological motivation” for terrorism. However, the beliefs of fundamentalist Christians are not the same as those of fundamentalist Muslims or fundamentalist Jews. It is a false portrayal. Either the authors have a very inaccurate understanding of the differences or they are deliberately lumping Christian fundamentalists together with other valid terrorist threats. The central question is - Why? If the motive was the second possibility, it is clear that their motive was to categorize and “set up” people labeled “fundamentalists Christians” in order that they might be targeted and receive the same fate from the United States government as people labeled “fundamentalist” Muslim jihadists. Was this lie deliberately created by marxists and/or others who hate Biblebelieving Christians in order to rationalize mistreatment, mass arrests and even executions of their political opponents by the government of the United States? Whereas, the truth is that there is absolutely no teaching found in New Testament Christianity that provides an “ideological motivation” for acts of terrorism. But truth and facts are irrelevant to marxists and communists. What matters to them is advancing the “revolution.” In fact, Muslim fundamentalism is not the same as Christian fundamentalism. Genuine, biblical Christians are not terrorists and/or jihadists. And terrorists and/or jihadists are not genuine, biblical Christians. There is a huge difference between genuine, biblical Christians and terrorists and/or jihadists as revealed by JESUS in John 8:43-44; 10:10. Those who attempt to portray these two distinct groups as similar are grossly misrepresenting millions of Bible-believing Christians and are helping to propagate a lethal lie from the Devil himself – John 8:43-44. Moreover, these same prejudices used in political and religious profiling propagated via the DHS are infecting others in their sphere of influence as well. Just how many international, federal, state, and local leaders, law enforcement officials, and citizens now harbor similar anti-Christian prejudices and false conclusions expressed in these assessments? Do you remember the 20 February 2009 Missouri State Highway Patrol document – MIAC Strategic Report – “The Modern Militia Movement”? With features remarkably similar to the 7 April, 2009 DHS report which politicized national security and law-enforcement, this Missouri state report likewise attempted to lump together and portray citizens who are anti-abortion (pro-life) or believe in a coming world government under the Antichrist (Bible-believers) as being potentially dangerous people, members of right-wing militias, or possible domestic terrorists. The report grossly misrepresents the
10
beliefs of many Bible-believing Christians and conservatives. It appears that the authors of the 20 February, 2009 MIAC Strategic Report prepared it with the deliberate purpose of vilifying Bible-believing Christians and conservatives, their beliefs and associating them with militias and violent criminals (25). This current trend is beyond outrageous! With great insight, former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation J. Edgar Hoover in his book Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It warned, “…They [marxists and communists] would destroy the peace of the country and thrust it into a condition of anarchy and lawlessness and immorality that passes imagination.” (26) Mr. Hoover observed that, from the perspective of a marxist/communist, “Morality is strictly a bourgeois device. To the communists everything that promotes the [marxist] revolution is moral, legal, and beautiful.” (27) Likewise, Vladimir Lenin, who helped Karl Marx write the Communist Manifesto wrote, “The best revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals.” (28) Why? Because immoral youth without godly character and morals, can be more easily convinced to murder, steal and lie to advance their Devil-led, murderous “revolutions.” Whereas, godly Christians fear sinning against God and respect the lives and properties of others. Christians believe in the sanctity of all human life (including unborn babies). Thus, genuine, biblical Christianity has never been compatible with marxism. The marxists know this. Consequently, twentieth-century neo-marxists, such as atheist Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937), who founded the weekly newspaper L’ Ordine Nuevo (the New Order), and Willi Munzenberg (1889-1940), taught marxists to infiltrate the churches and institutions of society and change them from within. Neo-marxist professor Carl Grunberg founded the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt in 1923. This school was established to function as “a Marxist-oriented research center.” (29) The school became known for advocating a synthesis of marxism with culture, thereby creating “cultural marxism.” Marxists associated with this perspective of the Institute came to be identified with “The Frankfurt School.” “Cultural Marxists” believe that it is first necessary to break down society, degrade the culture and undermine the morality of the people in order to bring about a “cultural revolution” via “cultural marxism.” Their goal was for marxists to penetrate the American culture, take it over and then remake it from within. Hard core marxists advocate the eradication of capitalism; private property; Christianity; Christian morality; the traditional, Christian (nuclear) family unit of father, mother and child/children [which Marx falsely regarded as the “bourgeoisie family”]; and the U. S. Constitution. Their end game is to establish a totalitarian, utopian, socialist, unified, global State known in their writings as “New Order,” “New World Order” and “Global civilization.” They have deliberately sought to corrupt the morals of the youth, destroy the traditional family unit and thereby create a strong dependency of the people on the government as their primary caretaker. Marxists have also targeted many Christian wives and mothers to corrupt with their false, marxist view of “Feminism.” They have also infiltrated public education and seek to use it as a means to indoctrinate children from the earliest possible age in the teachings of Marxism. At its core, Marxism is rebellion against God and His eternal laws found in the Holy Bible. Karl Marx was at war against God. Marxists today continue in this same evil rebellion. Marx believed that people exist for the benefit of the State and that our children belong to the State. Whereas, biblical Christianity affirms that our bodies, minds and
11
spirits belong to our LORD (I Corinthians 3:16-17; 6:15-20). Likewise, our children belong to the LORD, not to a corrupt, man-made, socialist government. Marxism/communism includes doctrines only Satan himself could have inspired. Marxism/communism has caused more murders, genocides, wars and human misery than any other single belief system (except Islam) in human history. Over the years, marxists, including mass murderers such as Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung, Pol Pot, Kim II Sung, Fidel Castro and others, have ordered the murders of many people. Here we find the real fruit of marxism/communism – SATANIC EVIL! Many millions of people have been murdered as a result of their regimes. If ever one verse of Scripture summarized the doctrines and deeds of marxists and communists it is Psalm 14:1. King David declared in Psalm 14:1, “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.” Communism makes the State a false god in place of the true and living God of the Scriptures. In Communism human value and human rights are determined by the State. Communism makes its citizens slaves to serve the Communist State. This is why Marxists and communists often harbor such hatred toward Christians and the Holy Bible. They recognize that we serve a higher authority than the State. As Christians, we affirm supreme allegiance to the LORD and His Word – the Holy Bible above all others and all else in our lives. As the Christian founding fathers of our nation believed, we likewise believe that our dignity, rights, and freedoms come from our Creator. It was the second president of our nation who declared, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (30) Furthermore, the Christian worldview affirms the biblical family unit, established by, and under the authority of, our Creator, as consisting of a father, mother, and child/children. Whereas, the marxist/communist view is that the State is the primary authority, provider, and nurturer of children. There is a huge difference. Author David Noebel explained, “The family is the glue that holds society together. As the family goes, so goes society…Remarkably, however, Marxists and Humanists, blind to the folly of their ways, press fervently on toward utopia. In their quest for the ultimate society, Marxists believe that economics and the forces of production play the primary role, while Humanists trust world government to lead us to the promised land. Both worldviews believe that civilization is evolving from imperfection to perfection, from disorder to order (in direct contradiction to the principle of the Second Law of Thermodynamics). Both want a world order based on atheism, evolution, and socialism… The Marxist believes that the dialectic has worked throughout history to lead society through a series of syntheses, from primitive communism to slavery to feudalism to capitalism and, recently, to socialism. Socialism itself is a transition between capitalism and communism. Marxist theory trusts that the worker (the antithesis) will clash with the capitalist (the thesis), creating a revolution leading to world socialism and, eventually, communism. A dictatorship of the proletariat (under the guidance of the Marxist/Leninist party) will be necessary initially to enforce such a world order, but it will wither away with the advent of communism. Likewise, law is now necessary to move men toward communism, but eventually the need for law will disappear.” (31) Such is the ideology of the communists in China, North Korea and elsewhere.
12
But President Abraham Lincoln taught, “We do not enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich.” Once the rich “bourgeoisie” have been robbed and murdered in the senseless, unnecessary, murderous “revolutions,” there is nobody with money left to receive taxes from, start new businesses and create new jobs for “the proletariat.” Thus, marxism/socialism results in more poverty and worse conditions in the long term. It is a system that has failed everywhere it has been established. It is truly one of the “doctrines of devils.” (I Timothy 4:1-2) Is there a better way than marxism, communism and global socialism? YES! JESUS IS THE BETTER WAY! CHRIST’S TEACHINGS HAVE MUCH BETTER OUTCOMES. OUR LORD JESUS DECLARED, “I AM THE WAY, THE TRUTH, THE LIFE: NO MAN COMETH UNTO THE FATHER BUT BY ME.” (JOHN 14:6) LIKEWISE, JESUS TAUGHT, “I AM THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD: HE THAT FOLLOWETH ME SHALL NOT WALK IN DARKNESS, BUT SHALL HAVE THE LIGHT OF LIFE.” (JOHN 8:12) TO THE WORKERS JESUS SAID, “COME UNTO ME, ALL YE THAT LABOR AND ARE HEAVY LADEN, AND I WILL GIVE YOU REST. TAKE MY YOKE UPON YOU, AND LEARN OF ME; FOR I AM MEEK AND LOWLY OF HEART: AND YE SHALL FIND REST UNTO YOUR SOULS.” (MATT. 11:28-29) WHY DO WE REJECT MARXISM/COMMUNISM? 1) MARXISM/COMMUNISM DENIES THE AUTHORITY OF GOD AND HIS WORD – THE HOLY BIBLE IN OUR LIVES. IT IS A SYSTEM OF BELIEF THAT IS MAN-CENTERED, INSTEAD OF BEING CHRIST-CENTERED. 2) MARXISM/COMMUNISM IS AN UNGODLY BELIEF SYSTEM THAT IS NOT BASED ON GOD’S LOVE. INSTEAD, MARXISM/COMMUNISM PROMOTES CLASS HATRED AND CONFLICT AMONG PEOPLE GROUPS BY PITTING ONE GROUP AGAINST THE OTHER. IT IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS CHRIST. JESUS TEACHES US TO LOVE ALL PEOPLE INCLUDING THE RICH AND THE POOR, THE OPRESSED AND THE OPPRESSORS (MATTHEW 22:37-40, LUKE 6:27-38, JOHN 13:35; 14:15-23; 15:12). 3) MARXISM/COMMUNISM IS NOT BASED ON GOD’S PEACE. IT CONTINUALLY LEADS PEOPLE DOWN A PATHWAY OF CONFLICT AND CRISIS TO CREATE A NEW SYNTHESIS TO BE OVERTHROWN BY OTHERS. WHEREAS, JESUS TAUGHT, “BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS: FOR THEY SHALL BE CALLED THE CHILDREN OF GOD.”(MATTHEW 5:9) IN ADDITION, JESUS PROMISES INNER PEACE TO THOSE WHO FOLLOW AND SERVE HIM (JOHN 14:27; 16:33, ROMANS 5:1). 4) MARXISM/COMMUNISM DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE SUPERNATURAL INTERVENTIONS OF GOD IN HISTORY OR GLORIFY GOD FOR MEETING THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE. RATHER, IT REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDE AND THANK GOD FOR BEING THE TRUE SOURCE OF ALL PROVISIONS AND BLESSINGS (PSALM 24:1). THUS, WE NEED NOT SELL OUR SOULS TO THE ATHEISTIC SYSTEM OF MARXISM IN ORDER TO FIND HELP FOR PEOPLE. RATHER, LET US TRUST GOD TO MEET OUR NEEDS (MATT. 6:33). 5) IN REALITY, MARXISM/COMMUNISM IS BASED ON A DESTRUCTIVE PROCESS. THUS, IT CREATES MORE LONG-TERM PROBLEMS THAN SOLUTIONS FOR WORKERS. 6) MARXISM/COMMUNISM IS A DEATH TRAP. IT IS AN IDEOLOGY BASED ON THE MINDSET OF CRIMINALS. WHEN PRACTICED, IT RESULTS IN NOTHING MORE THAN ENDLESS, MURDEROUS, BLOODY WARS, PURGES AND REVOLUTIONS RESULTING IN FEAR, DISTRUST, TREACHERY, MISERY AND DESPAIR. OVER THE YEARS, HOW MANY
13
PEOPLE HAVE DIED IN SENSELESS VIOLENCE AS A RESULT OF THE PROPAGATION OF MARXISM/COMMUNISM? MANY MILLIONS! 7) THERE IS A BETTER WAY. FOLLOWING OUR SAVIOR’S EXAMPLE IS BETTER. JESUS DID NOT SEEK SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS OF THE PEOPLE BY FOLLOWING THE CONCEPTS OF MARXISM. WHOSE TEACHINGS DO YOU WANT TO FOLLOW? JESUS THE SAVIOR WHO CAN FORGIVE YOUR SINS OR MARX THE MURDEROUS CRIMINAL? Perhaps you are wandering why I have provided background data regarding the beliefs, practices and subversive plans of the marxist/communist agenda in America up to this point. There is a very good reason. Because there is a clear interrelationship between the Marxist/communist agenda and the homosexual agenda in the United States. How? The two Movements have been converged for decades. Marxists/communists infiltrated and have supported the LGBT social movements in the twentieth century. Moreover, marxists/communists have had a major part in the founding, planning and directing of key homosexual political action groups. Even today, there continues to be a very real influence of the leftists and cultural marxism in the LGBT agenda. Let’s look at how this happened. In his book Masters of Deceit in CHAPTER 15 entitled “Mass Agitation” former Director of the F.B.I., J. Edgar Hoover, explained how marxists/communists create and use “fronts” to advance their agenda. Communists purposely infiltrate minority groups and then create agitation from within concerning perceived “grievances” caused by “greedy capitalists” in order to help incite a marxist revolution. This certainly includes infiltration of LGBT minority groups. In his investigations J. Edgar Hoover found, “AS STATED IN CHAPTER 10, the Party’s attack is geared to the wide variety of American life. Communism has something to sell to everybody. And, following this principle, it is the function of mass agitation to exploit all the grievances, hopes, aspirations, prejudices, fears, and ideals of all the special groups that make up our society, social, religious, economic, racial, political. Stir them up. Set one against the other. Divide and conquer. That’s the way to soften up a democracy [for a marxist revolution]…” (32) Mr. Hoover further explained, “…A front is an organization which the communists openly or secretly control…Party influence, therefore, is transmitted, time after time, by a belt of concealed members, sympathizers and dupes. Fronts become transmission belts between the Party and the noncommunist world. Earl Browder, when head of the Party, gave this definition: “Transmission belts mean having Communists work among the masses in the various organizations.” Some may be newly created, or, as often happens, they may be old-line organizations captured by infiltration,…They may operate nationally, regionally, or locally. Some are permanent organizations; others exist for only a day, a week, or a month. The Party has operated hundreds of major fronts in practically every field of Party agitation: “peace,” civil rights, protection of the foreign-born, support for Smith Act “victims,” abolition of H-bomb tests, exploitation of nationality or minority groups. Some are based on specific appeal, to teachers, writers, lawyers, labor, women, youth. Many have national officers, local chapters, and substantial assets. In addition, hundreds of minor fronts of all shapes, sizes and types appear each year in everyday Party life…” (33) J. Edgar Hoover continued, “…Fronts exist not in isolation but as part of a vast, interlaced front system. Communist pressure can be greatly increased by manipulating
14
these organizations…on October 16, 1943, the Young Communist League was dissolved and the very next day the American Youth for Democracy was formed. Later the group was called Labor Youth League. All were designed to recruit young people for communism…fronts…the Party makes use of them in mass agitation…Agitation must be carried on in specialized fields: among women, among youth, among veterans, among racial and nationality groups, farmers, trade unions. That’s the responsibility of the Party commissions. Consider youth, a prime target of communist attack...” (34) Mr. Hoover added, “…The campaign is launched, urging the veto of the Anticommunism Bill. Let’s see how the Party’s front system is brought into play. Suddenly telegrams, letters, petitions pour in on the governor from all kinds of groups such as organizations protesting higher taxes, youth, women’s, union, and veterans’ organizations; free speech groups; civil-rights organizations. To an uncritical eye it must seem that a wide stratum of population is interested in a veto of the anticommunist legislation. Then messages arrive from other countries (from international fronts), as if the whole world, “millions of people” as the communists like to say, is vitally interested in the bill…the Communist Party, through its front system, can stimulate a vast and often effective propaganda barrage – a barrage which, within hours, can be turned off or shifted elsewhere…At the center is always the Party, organizing, manipulating, seeing that the right persons are in charge…The communists realize that if the secretary (or other key officer) is a communist (almost always a concealed member), the Party can dominate the organization…Around this communist core come layer after layer of non communists. As we have seen in Chapter 15, great emphasis is placed on attracting non communist, the more prominent the better, into communist propaganda work. These non communists, by allowing their names to be used as sponsors, giving testimonials, or appearing at front rallies, are aiding the Party. It cannot be emphasized too often how the communists attempt to exploit for strictly partisan purposes the legitimate interests of non-communists in social and economic problems, world peace, civil rights, and so forth…” (35) During the twentieth century, the marxists/communists established various societies and organizations to further their agenda in the United States and in Europe. One such society was the Mattachine Society started by Henry Hay in 1950. Hay was a leading member of the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA). The primary purpose of the communists for the founding of the Mattachine Society was to promote homosexuality and normalize homosexuality in the United States. Their aim was to increase the impact of the Society and the homosexual rights movement in America and use it as a source of “agitation.” In addition, the communists viewed the Mattachine Society as a tool to help undermine and corrupt the morality of many American youth. Do you remember stage one – “demoralization?” The homosexual movement was infiltrated to serve as one part of a larger leftist agenda - the demoralizing of Americans to prepare for marxist revolution. Yet, keep in mind that many of those who participated in the early years of the LGBT movement were likely unaware of the hidden agenda of the communists. Nevertheless, having been previously warned by former F. B. I. agent Skousen concerning the criminal mindset of a marxist, what an incredible amount of evil might a militant marxist, who is also a homosexual, accomplish to advance the Devil’s work and
15
kingdom, if provided the opportunity? Consider the evidences of the early infiltration of the LGBT movement by marxists, communists and Fabian socialists for the purpose of forming a “parallel political movement” to advance “cultural revolution” in the United States. Notice carefully that according to this article, “Most of the Mattachine founders were communists.” We read, “The Mattachine Society, founded in 1950, was one of the earliest homophile (gay rights) organizations in the United States, probably second only to Chicago's Society for Human Rights. Harry Hay and a group of Los Angeles male friends formed the group to protect and improve the rights of gay men. Because of concerns for secrecy and the founders' left-wing ideology, they adopted the cell organization being used by the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA). In the anti-Communist atmosphere of the 1950s, the Society's growing membership replaced the group's early Communist model with a more traditional ameliorative civil rights leadership style and programme. Then, as branches formed in other cities, the Society splintered in regional groups by 1961…” “…Harry Hay conceived of the idea of a gay activist group in 1948. After signing a petition for Progressive Party presidential candidate Henry A. Wallace, Hay spoke with other gay men at a party about forming a gay support organization for him called "Bachelors for Wallace".[1] Encouraged by the response he received, Hay wrote the organizing principles that night, a document he referred to as "The Call".[2] However, the men who had been interested at the party were less than enthusiastic the following morning.[1] Over the next two years, Hay refined his idea, finally conceiving of an "international...fraternal order" to serve as "a service and welfare organization devoted to the protection and improvement of Society's Androgynous Minority"...[3] “…Most of the Mattachine founders were communists…” “…Following the Jennings trial, the group expanded rapidly, with founders estimating membership in California by May 1953 at over 2,000 with as many as 100 people joining a typical discussion group.” (36) Likewise, notice the involvement of the London School of Economics (Fabian socialists) in the early years of the organization known as the Gay Liberation Front. We observe, “In the United Kingdom the GLF had its first meeting in the basement of the London School of Economics on 13 October 1970. Bob Mellors and Aubrey Walter had seen the effect of the GLF in the United States and created a parallel movement based on revolutionary politics and alternative lifestyle.[33] By 1971, the UK GLF was recognized as a political movement in the national press, holding weekly meetings of 200 to 300 people.[34] The GLF Manifesto was published, and a series of high-profile direct actions, were carried out…” [35] (37) Furthermore, we observe the very real influence of marxism within the Feminist movement in the twentieth-century. For example, we know that Betty Friedan (1921-2006), founder of the National Organization for Women (NOW), was a marxist and that she worked closely with other marxists (including CPUSA members) for the “transformation” of society. In like manner, note the anti-traditional family and anti-capitalism teachings found in Lesbian Feminism. We read, “…Lesbian feminism, which was most influential from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, encouraged women to direct their energies toward other women rather than men, and advocated lesbianism as the logical result of feminism…”[54] “…Nevertheless, if one key theme could be isolated it would be an analysis of heterosexuality as an institution.[5] Lesbian feminist texts work to denaturalise heterosexuality and, based on this denaturalization, to explore heterosexuality's "roots" in institutions such as patriarchy, capitalism and colonialism. Additionally, lesbian feminism advocates lesbianism as a rational result of alienation and dissatisfaction with these institutions.” (38)
16
In 1992 Curtis Bowers, who later became a state representative in Idaho, was invited by a friend to a meeting of the communist party held at the University of California, Berkeley campus. Bowers reported that in this meeting the marxists/communists outlined their plan to infiltrate the institutions of America and influence us in the direction that they want us to go. To destroy our families (which, like Marx they believe are “bourgeoisie” families) the marxists/communists want to: 1) Promote cohabitation instead of marriage 2) Get children away into government programs (for indoctrination) at the earliest age possible 3) Support the Feminist Movement because it has been very successful in making women discontent with marriage and motherhood In order to destroy our business (free markets of capitalism) the marxists/communists urged support of the Environmental Movement. They thought it is the only vehicle capable of creating enough regulation and red tape to discourage business growth. To destroy culture and religion in America the marxists/communists said that if they can get Americans to accept homosexuality, they thought it will begin to extinguish our traditional moral values. (39) I checked out this report by Curtis Bowers. To my knowledge, it is an accurate report. It appears that America is being deliberately taken down, and the LGBT Movement is just one part of the overall plan and agenda of those who hate us and our biblical Christian beliefs. Another concern is that the left may try to use the new “homosexual orientation” laws or the “homosexual marriage” laws as a means to incite conflict and/or crisis. Unlike Christianity, Marxism does not seek peace with all people (Matthew 5:9, Hebrews 12:14). Rather, marxists purpose to create agitation, conflicts and crisis in order to help overthrow capitalism and advance a “marxist revolution” within nations. The homosexual marriage agenda is currently a very divisive issue among the American people. Many feel very strongly that it is a desecration of the sacred institution of marriage. The left knows this and may exploit the homosexual agenda for their own purposes. David Horowitz commented, “An SDS [marxist] radical once wrote, “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.” In other words the cause – whether inner city blacks or women [or homosexual marriage] – is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause which is the accumulation of power to make the revolution. That was the all consuming focus of Alinsky and his radicals.” (40)
17
Endnotes: 1. W. Cleon Skousen, The NAKED COMMUNIST, (IZZARD INK PUBLISHING, Salt Lake City, UT, 1958) INTRODUCTION THE RISE OF THE MARXIST MAN 2. Curtis Bowers, AGENDA: GRINDING AMERICA DOWN, a documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDo8xAQGrl8 3. David Noebel, UNDERSTANDING THE TIMES, (Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, OR, 1991), p. 754 4. Ibid., AGENDA: GRINDING AMERICA DOWN 5. Ibid., UNDERSTANDING THE TIMES, p. 756 6. Ibid., UNSERSTANDING THE TIMES, p. 757 7. David Horowitz, BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, (David Horowitz Freedom Center, Sherman Oaks, CA, 2009), p. 3 8. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, p. 7 9. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, p. 16 10. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, p. 16 11. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, p. 23 12. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, p. 22 13. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, p. 18 14. Yuri Bezmenov: Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society, www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCq5XE8g 15. Ibid., The NAKED COMMUNIST, 16. William Z. Foster, toward SOVIET AMERICA, (ELGIN PUBLICATIONS, Balboa Island, CA, 1961 – a republication of the 1932 original edition), FOREWORD, iv 17. Ibid., toward SOVIET AMERICA, pp. 306-307 18. Ibid., toward SOVIET AMERICA, p. 275 19. Ibid., toward SOVIET AMERICA, pp. 277-278 20. Department of Homeland Security Report – 7 April, 2009, (U//FOU) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf 21. Gary LaFree and Bianca Bersani, “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008,” Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, College Park, MD: START, January 30, 2012. 22. MIAC Strategic Report – “The Modern Militia Movement”, 20 February 2009 Missouri State Highway Patrol document – http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIACStrategic-Report-20Feb0923. Department of Homeland Security Report – 7 April, 2009, (U//FOU) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf 24. Gary LaFree and Bianca Bersani, “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008,” Final Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, College Park, MD: START, January 30, 2012. Pp. 9-10
18
25. MIAC Strategic Report – “The Modern Militia Movement”, 20 February 2009 Missouri State Highway Patrol document – http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIACStrategic-Report-20Feb0926. J. Edgar Hoover, Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, (HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY, New York, NY, 1958), Foreword, v. 27. Ibid., Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, p. 195 28. William Guy Carr, PAWNS In The Game, 7th Edition, (ST. GEORGE PUBLISHING, INC., Milwaukee, WI, 1958), p. 126 29. “Frankfurt School” article, http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School 30. Ibid., AGENDA: GRINDING AMERICA DOWN 31. Ibid., UNDERSTANDING THE TIMES, pp. 800, 817 32. Ibid., Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, CHAPTER 15, “Mass Agitation.” p. 197 33. Ibid., Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, CHAPTER 15, “Mass Agitation.” p. 228 34. Ibid., Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, CHAPTER 15, “Mass Agitation.” pp. 198, 231-232 35. Ibid., Masters of Deceit The Story of Communism in America and How to Fight It, CHAPTER 15, “Mass Agitation.” pp. 233-234 36. “The Mattachine Society” article, http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattachine_Society 37. “LGBT social movements” article, http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_social_movements 38. “LGBT social movements” article, http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_social_movements 39. Ibid., AGENDA: GRINDING AMERICA DOWN 40. Ibid., BARACK OBAMA’S RULES FOR REVOLUTION THE ALINSKY MODEL, pp. 8-9