Interaction_PZT_Structure

Different types of Piezoceramic-structure interaction models using electro mechanical impedance technique: A review

Venu Gopal Madhav ANNAMDAS University of Pittsburgh, PA

Co-Author: Kiran K. ANNAMDAS University of Miami, FL

SPIE 2009 San Diego

March/11/2009

Different types of Piezoceramic-structure interaction models using electro mechanical impedance technique: A review

Outline •

Introduction : Background of EMI Technique

•

Electro-Mechanical interaction in SDOF

•

Electro-Mechanical interaction in MDOF - 2D Model of Linear and Cross Impedances - 2D Model of Linear Impedances - 3D Model of Linear and Cross Impedances - Single and Multiple PZT-host structure interaction model • Conclusions Q&A

Different types of Piezoceramic-structure INTERACTION models using electro mechanical impedance technique: A review

PZT based Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) principle PZT: surface bonded or embedded + Electric field Structure

PZT

2 3 1

Z 1 / Admittance (Y)

ďƒ&#x;Finally obtain it

PZT: measures resistance of structure to vibrations

PZT based Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) principle in SHM Z (EMI) 1 / Admittance (Y) {Y = Conductance + j (Susceptance)}

Healthy Structure

YH = GH + j B H

Damaged Structure YD = GD + j BD

Comparison mechanism

Experimental Setup Multiplexer

Specimen

Impedance Analyzer

PZT

1 D model [SDOF] Liang et al., (1994) Assumptions • Mechanical interaction between actuator and structure occurs only at the ends of the actuator.

L

•

1D Model

Actuator Impedance Z a = F / V at end points (No electric field) Structure Impedance Z s = − F / V (electric field) F is actuator force V is drive point velocity 8

2 D model [M DOF] Zhou et al (1996)

8

Bhalla and Soh (2004) …..Special (simplified) 2D model of Zhou (1996) Assumptions • Mechanical interaction between a bonded actuator and its host structure occurs along entire boundary of the patch.

•

Plane X-Y

2L

2L

Effective displacement and effective velocity terms Instead of drive point velocity (Liang et al (1994)) Za= F / eff. Vel. (No elec. Field)

L

Zs= -F/ eff. Vel. (Elec. Field)

2L

Cont‌10

Different types of Piezoceramic-structure interaction models using electro mechanical impedance technique: A review

2

or Y

Only Extensional Actuation 1 or X

2D Stress Model (Bhalla and Soh 2004)

• Very small structure • Poor peak matching

3D Model L x W x T (mm3) 1

10 x 10 x 0.5

2

10 x 10 x 2

3

15 x15 x 0.5

4

15 x 15 x 2

Raja et al (2004)

d 24Shear actuation

d 33

Longitudinal actuation

(YZ Plane) Extensional actuation

d 32

E3

d15

E2

Z Y

Shear actuation

Face Y

(XZ Plane)

E1 L X

Face Z

Y 2H

Top

Extensional actuation

X W

d 31 Face X

Face Z

Bottom

3D actuation for embedded and surface bonded PZT Annamdas and Soh (2007), J. of Aerospace, ASCE

THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) ELECTROMECHANICAL IMPEDANCE MODEL: FORMULATION OF DIRECTIONAL SUM IMPEDANCE (DSI)

-( Z S ) = (Linear impedances) + (Cross impedances)

FX σ X (2 LH ) Z S1 = = u&1 u&1 ZS2

FY σ Y (2WH ) = = u& 2 u& 2

Z S3

FZ FT − FB = = u& 3 u& ZB − u& ZT

Z12 ≈ −

Z S 1Z S 2 Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3

Z 23

≈

−

ZS 2ZS 3 Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3

Z 31

≈

−

Z S 3 Z S1 Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3

THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) ELECTROMECHANICAL IMPEDANCE MODEL: FORMULATION OF DIRECTIONAL SUM IMPEDANCE (DSI)

Structural Impedance

− Z S = Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3 + 2Z12 − 2Z 23 − 2Z13

− Z S = ( Z S 1λ1 + Z S 2 λ2 − Z S 3λ3 ) Response Factors   Z S1  λ2 λ1 =   Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3 

(1) (2)

  ZS 2   ZS3   =  λ3 =    Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3   Z S1 + Z S 2 − Z S 3 

Semi Analytical

THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) ELECTROMECHANICAL IMPEDANCE MODEL: FORMULATION OF DIRECTIONAL SUM IMPEDANCE (DSI)

FX ,Y ,Z = FIK

Linear Impedance FX σ X (2 LH ) Z S1 =

=

u&1

u&1

ZS2

FY σ Y (2WH ) = = u& 2 u& 2

Z S3

FZ FT − FB = = u& 3 u& ZB − u& ZT N

u& I = ∑ u& IK K =1

Net Total Force on Face I

Total Force on Face I of PZT

THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) ELECTROMECHANICAL IMPEDANCE MODEL: FORMULATION OF DIRECTIONAL SUM IMPEDANCE (DSI)

− Z S = ( Z S 1λ1 + Z S 2λ2 − Z S 3λ3 )

σ

(2)

σ

2σ X λ1 ∑ WK 2 H 2σ Y λ2 ∑ LK 2 H 2σ Z λ3 ∑ LKWK 3 2 = + + 1 u& v& w&

σ

Semi-analytical directional stresses

σ 1  λ1 0 σ  0 λ = 2  2  σ 3  Semi _ analytical  0 0 Final Admittance

YA = G + j B

(3)

Response Factors

0 σ X  σ  0   Y λ3  Numerical σ Z  Analytical

THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) ELECTROMECHANICAL IMPEDANCE MODEL: FORMULATION OF DIRECTIONAL SUM IMPEDANCE (DSI)

Analytical + Numerical

Dimensions 10 cm x 10 cm x 2 mm 5 cm x 5 cm x 5 mm

• reasonably large structures •Surface +Emb. •Ext. + Long. act •Good peak pred.

•Rec / sq PZT •Elec. Iso / anisotrophy

(3D Single PZT- host structure model)

(Surface bonded PZT on a aluminium plate of dimension 10 cm x 10 cm x 2 mm)

(PZT embedded inside epoxy adhesive, which is sandwiched between two aluminium plates) Cont‌32

3D EMI MODEL FOR MULTIPLE PZT-STRUCTURE INTERACTION (Annamdas and Soh 2008), J of Aerospace, ASCE

3D EMI MODEL FOR MULTIPLE PZT-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

N PZT of different dimensions

Y

A

N

= G+ Bj = ∑ Y K =1

A K

N

=∑ K =1

jωLK WK 2H K

[ ε 33 + YR {

d31λ1{[ A0 sin kLK − d 31 ] + R[C0 sin kWK − d32 ] + R[ E0 k cos k 2H K − d 33 ]} + d 32 λ2 {R[ A0 sin kLK − d 31 ] + [C 0 sin kWK − d 32 ] + R[ E0 k cos k 2 H K − d 33 ]} +

d 33λ3 {R[ A0 sin kLK − d 31 ] + R[C0 sin kWK − d 32 ] + [ E0 k cos k 2 H K − d33 ]}}]

3D EMI MODEL FOR MULTIPLE PZT-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

Case 1

Multiple PZT Specimen

3D EMI MODEL FOR MULTIPLE PZT-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

case2

Multiple PZT Specimen

3D EMI MODEL FOR MULTIPLE PZT-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

Case 3

Multiple PZT Specimen

3D EMI MODEL FOR MULTIPLE PZT-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

Results Case 1

Case 2

Case 3

43

3D EMI MODEL OF PZT– ADHESIVE - STRUCTURE Epoxy adhesive mm3

Al

1

Negligible

100 x 100 x 2

2

10 x 10 x 0.5

3

10 x 10 x 1

Finite element mesh of one-quarter 1

mm3

PZT mm3 10 x10 x 0.3

Finite element mesh of one quarter 2

Results

EMI MODEL OF PZT– ADHESIVE - STRUCTURE

Experimental

Experimental

Conclusions 1. Safety, reliability are important for SHM. Especially for those structures which involve human traffic and huge investments such as the aerospace structures and bridges.

2. In the recent past, PZT has evolved as an efficient smart material which was usually employed in EMI technique. This involves smart interaction of PZT with host structure to be monitored.

3. Many types of SDOF and MDOF based PZT structure interaction models, i.e 1D, 2D and 3D are presented. Any type of model developed by previous researchers or any type of model to be developed by new researchers belongs to one of these interaction models.

4. These models, consider PZT to be negligible in mass in SDOF interaction models where as considers in MDOF interaction models.

5. Epoxy underneath the PZT is either negligible or considerable depending on the type of interaction model. However surface bonded models may ignore mass, stiffness and damping of PZT and epoxy underneath if it is a single PZT. Whereas if PZT needs to be embedded.

6. Additional protections (like casings) have to be wrapped and may increase the over all mass of PZT and thus its mass has to be considered in the formulations.

7. Finally, if the interaction is based on multiple PZT, the admittance signature depends on, the number of PZTs which are active (actuating and sensing). Additionally, it should be noted that the passive (non actuating or sensing) PZTs on host structure can considerably increase the load on the structure to be monitored.

8. Thus, interaction mechanism of PZT-structure depends on many factors like, type of host structure to be monitored (1D, 2D and 3D), number of active and passive PZTs (single or multiple) and type of bonding (surface bonded or embedded).

for your attention