••• ISION, RTICLES, EVIEWS, TORIES, NFORMATION, HOUGHTS AND WHAT OU WANT TO READ ••• The Independent Student Newspaper est. 1947
WEEK
LENT
Friday 27th January 2012 Issue No 751 | varsity.co.uk
10 Features: How Warsaw adapted it’s Soviet Palace for every day life
12 Listings: My Cambridge Week 16 Film: ArcSoc 18 Theatre: Varsity speaks to the cast of Rookie, the Cinefile
all-female sketch show
Shhh... UL’s secrets revealed
Exclusive: student who rejected Oxford University speaks to Varsity
1CM 1CM
17
Colleges aren’t paying a living wage to all employees by Matt Russell, Andrew Griffin NEWS CORRESPONDENTS
Almost all Cambridge colleges are not paying living wages to all of their staff, Freedom of Information requests have revealed. The University itself pays 112 members of staff less than the living wage threshold of £7.20 per hour. As well as all training staff, many employees classified as Grade 1, the University’s least senior staff, are on less than the living wage. The living wage is a rate of pay that allows workers to afford the basic essentials in life, such as housing, food and utilities. Outside of London, the rate is calculated by the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University and is determined annually. The problem has been identified across Cambridge, not just within
the University, that staff are not being paid living wages with Labour and Green councillors pressuring to make Cambridge City Council a living wage employer. Out of the colleges, only Hughes Hall were able to state unequivocally that all staff are paid living wage, although Jesus said that no permanent staff were on less than the living wage, but offered no such qualification about the casual staff who are not on a fixed contract with the college. Two of the worst offending colleges are Homerton and Emmanuel who, at the time of the FOI requests by the Cambridge University Labour Club (CULC) in October, employed 65 and 70 people respectively below the living wage. Homerton told Varsity that all permanent staff are paid above the living wage, while the number of casual
workers fluctuates throughout the year. Some colleges have responded by suggesting that the figure may not be truly reflective because of engagement in training and apprenticeship schemes, and also that the term ‘living wage’ may not be wholly appropriate in that context. Another common reason cited by the bursars contacted by Varsity for not paying the living wage to staff, and particularly casual workers, is the correlation between staff costs and student charges. In most colleges, staff costs account for between 40-50% of what students pay. Some also pointed towards generous pension schemes, benefits such as free meals and free parking, and the fact that many casual staff are below the age of 20 and therefore often on much more than the minimum wage. Continues on page 3
Neutral Milk Hotel
BOOKS
Ahdaf Soueif by Sarah Hall
FILM
Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation
ART
Henri GaudierBrzeska: Vorticist!
THEATRE
The Dumb Waiter, Zombie Haiku
WEEKEND WEATHER
PS. Look out for our new-look website, coming soon to a laptop near you
British photographer Martin Parr
Fighting for a Living Wage
MUSIC
9 771758 444002
‘The postcard’s role in the understanding and dissemination of culture is extremely important. It is a very democratic art form’
“I originally applied to Cambridge (Emmanuel College) last year. I think Emmanuel’s test system is a reasonably good idea, though I found the interview process stressful. I think people receive their most valuable education when they decide they really want to study something. It is inconsequential at what point this happens, although it is far easier to study at home pre-university, as GCSEs and A-levels are thoroughly limiting. The wide-spread interest that my rejection email sparked fascinates me. It’s bizarre that you can make the headlines for laughing at something. Imagine the headline, “student mocks the monarchy”–for some reason, it wouldn’t have the same effect. Additionally, the anger that my letter caused was definitely most extreme in Oxbridge students/ graduates. I find this quite hilarious, and was taken even further with many claiming, “She can’t criticise it as she’s not a student here, and therefore knows nothing.” To continue the earlier example, imagine if we believed that only the royal family could question the monarchy. Ridiculous.” Elly Nowell
04 >
Investigation: Varsity gets a rare glimpse into the behind-thescenes workings of Cambridge’s University Library Main Feature: Warsaw’s Palace of Culture is put under the microscope