More diversity | 2 needed in men’s fashion
Women’s fashion embraces body diversity while unrealistic standards still apply for men
The Little Things | 4-5
Energy overload | 6
In pictures: What the last year taught us about taking things for granted
Kids turn to caffeine for energy when what they need is more nutrients and sleep
Vanguard College Preparatory School, 2517 Mt. Carmel Dr., Waco, Texas 76710
November 2021, Volume 49, Issue 2
The Vanguard Review A VCPS Publication
At stake: life and liberty
Texas abortion law strictest in U.S. history; students react Landri Wheeler ‘24 reporter
O
n September 1, the Texas Heartbeat Act, or Senate Bill 8, was enacted, stating that it is now illegal to seek an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. The bill, which was signed into law by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on May 19, is controversial because critics say it cuts off access to abortions before most women even know they are pregnant. The law also allows citizens to sue people for making donations or assisting someone in getting an abortion, making it one of the strictest abortion laws in the country. More than 47 percent of students said they think the Heartbeat Act is unethical, according to the October VR student poll. And 29 percent think the law is ethical. The law states that “a physician may not knowingly perform or induce an abortion on a pregnant woman if the physician detected a fetal heartbeat for the unborn child,” which is generally around six weeks.
“That is when the heartbeat forms,” Hope Hamblin, freshman, said. “When someone is unconscious and you’re trying to find out if they are dead or alive, you check to see if they have a pulse, which is your heartbeat. So, if that is the deciding factor between life and death for an adult, what is the difference between a baby in the womb?” Landry Stewart, 8th grade, said she supports the law. “I am for the law because it allows for more protection for the unborn, who are unable to protect themselves,” she said. Michael Bennett, sophomore, agreed. “I am for it,” he said. “I believe abortion has always been a moral issue and we need to protect the unborn, and if a law is required to do so, then it has my support. Besides, I believe people would stand up for their own unborn life, but won’t stand up for others since their life isn’t at risk, and something needs to be done.”
swing
The of things
Seating removed from pergola due to misuse
Continued on page 8
Drowning in Debt
As the national debt climbs, politicians and students weigh in on how to reduce it before it’s too late Delaney Trepinski ‘23 assistant editor
N
ew York Congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) caused a stir at the 2021 Met Gala when she wore an eye-catching white dress with “Tax the Rich” printed in red on the back, signaling her solution to how to reduce the U.S. ‘s rising national debt. But is AOC’s opinion of taxing the rich going to actually solve the federal government’s impending issue? With almost $30 trillion in national debt, with the addition of a projected $3 trillion this year, the U.S. government has reached its debt ceiling. That means it can no longer legally borrow any more money to pay for any government services and employee salaries. Last month, the Senate passed legislation to allow the government to continue borrowing through December. But then, Congress will vote to increase this very large amount to even more. Democrats and Republicans are constantly battling over how to reduce this crippling national debt: by increasing taxes or cutting government spending. Students and faculty share their views on how to solve the problem. “The ‘rich’ are already paying a substantial portion of their income in taxes,” said junior Andrew Holze. “The highest federal tax rate is 37 percent and for those living in locations with state and city income tax, the highest income taxpayers can easily pay 45-50 percent of their income in taxes, according to the International Revenue Service (IRS).” Holze said taking money from job creators just doesn’t make good economic sense. “Much of the burden is falling on small busi-
ness owners who cannot afford the higher taxes,” Holze said. Economics teacher David Foti agreed. “The top marginal tax rate at the federal level is about 40 percent right now and if you add state income tax on top of that - for states like New York and California - the top marginal tax rate is over 50 percent,” Foti said. “So, I guess you could tax them more, if you don’t consider 40 and 50 percent enough.” If you combine the net worth of the 20 richest people in America, it totals a stunning $1.8 trillion, according to the Forbes 400, Forbes magazine’s annual list of the wealthiest Americans. The study also showed that the people on the list increased their collective wealth by 40 percent over the last year, while many Americans suffered job losses and business closures due to the pandemic. “Even if we took every penny from the top 25 people, it still wouldn’t be enough to cover our shortfall just for this year - and then they would be broke,” Foti said. “You can’t solve this problem mathematically, even by taking 100 percent of the richest peoples’ money. You could not get that deficit number to zero.” Sophomore Samuel Pole said he believes taxing the highest income earners is a good way to pay down the national debt. “I think it is fair to make them pay their fair share,” he said. “They have so much money, there’s no reason for them not to have to pay.” But even if taxes go up for the richest people, there will have to be cuts as well in order to make a dent in the national debt. “Cutting government spending is a better apContinued on page 8
A lone chain hangs from the pergola where three porch-style swings once provided a place for students to hang out during break and enjoy their lunch on sunny days. “People weren’t respecing the swings,” said assistant head of school Zach Seifert. “We put signs out that said ‘no more than two kids on the swings’ and, evidently, the signs didn’t work, so we had to take the next step.” Photo by Isaac Saadi / VR staff
Isaac Saadi ‘22 editor-in-chief
S
tudents were met with utter shock on Thursday, Oct. 14 when they went to their usual hangout spot and discovered that the pergola outside the senior lounge had all of a sudden been stripped of its swings, leaving an empty hexagonal void, lacking the lively human interaction present just days before. “I was like, oh shoot, we’re in trouble,” 8th grader, Colton McCullough, said. Associate head of school Zach Seifert said the reasons the swings were removed came down to the fundamental reason that the students could not follow the rules. “People weren’t respecting the swings and we had too many kids on there,” he said. “We put signs out that said ‘no more than two kids on the swing’ and, evidently, the signs didn’t work so we had to take the next step.” The 8th-graders had mixed responses to the number of warnings they received. “I kind of expected it because we were warned, but I felt like we kind of deserved it because we didn’t follow the rules,” Toni Mickleburgh, 8th grade, said. Kaitlyn Phillips, 8th grade, agreed. “I felt like it was coming because I heard so much stuff from the hallways, but I still feel like we need another chance,” Phillips said. But 8th grader Paiton Jones has differing views. “I was confused because, for one thing, we didn’t get a warning,” she said. English teacher Wendy Allman, Ph.D., who has a direct view of the pergola from her classroom window, explained the significance of the rules put
in place. “After swings that were overloaded and pushed aggressively fell down on several occasions, two rules — maximum of two riders, no pushing — were formulated to prevent student injury as well as to preserve the structure,” she said. “In the last few weeks, numerous students repeatedly failed to observe the rules, despite posted reminders in the pergola and reiterated warnings from faculty and staff. Therefore, the only way to ensure the safety of students and to prevent damage to the pergola was to remove the swings.” Allman talked about the history of the pergola, and why the actions have been particularly disheartening to the staff. “The pergola was erected in memory of sweet Amy Kaur, who passed away suddenly and tragically in the spring of her senior year, 2017,” she said. “The idea was to memorialize a beloved student through a beautiful area of serenity.” Some 8th graders were surprised to learn the history after the swings had been removed. Over the past four years, the pergola has held great significance to the students who utilize it, even though they did not know how it came to be. “I would very, very much like to have them back, Triston Robertson, 8th grade, said. “It was super fun over there since it was right by where everybody would like to play games,” he said. “Everybody would meet over there and sit on the swings, so having them go away was pretty upsetting.” The disappearance of the swing has been felt by high schoolers as well. Continued on page 8