The Vermont Cynic FEBRUARY 20, 2018
VOL. 134 – ISSUE 21
VTCYNIC.COM
Students battle with meal insecurity Ben Elfand Staff Writer Lee Hughes Staff Writer Roughly a quarter of UVM students are unsure of where their next meals will come from. The SGA Student Action Committee is now working with several departments to identify and address student food insecurity, senior SGA Senator Bhumika Patel said. The committee will design a plan to resolve the issue of student food insecurity. They will meet within the next month to discuss survey results, Patel said. Food insecurity is “repetitively not knowing when your next meal is or what you’re going to eat, maybe not having an adequate meal,” Patel said. The newly formed committee is a collaboration among University departments, said Nicole Rohrig, an on-campus registered dietitian. The committee conducted two surveys in February and November 2017 to gather data. Each survey was sent to a random sample of 4,500 students, staff and faculty and had a response rate of around 25 percent, said Meredith Niles, a professor of nutrition and food sciences. The survey is based on the USDA food insecurity survey. The results of the surveys will not be officially released
GENEVIEVE WINN until the committee examines the data and decides the best course of action, Niles said. “We wanted to look at whether this was an issue and to what extent,” Rohrig said. The new committee is considering a few possible solutions to the problem, Rohrig said. Swipe Out Hunger
is a program that has been effectively implemented on 36 campuses nationwide. “You can donate extra meals or points at the end of the semester and those would basically go into a bank for students who are food insecure to be able to get meals added to their CATcard,” Rohrig said.
Other potential solutions include a campus-wide food pantry, a food bank of leftover dining hall food and a system to alert students of free food on campus, Patel said. The issue is rarely addressed due to stigmas around hunger, Rohrig said. “We could have the resourc-
es available, but if nobody feels comfortable coming forward and talking to somebody about it, they’re not going to get the help they need anyway,” she said. Patel attributes the trend of food insecurity to a lack of access, financial means and education. “It could be a budgeting problem,” sophomore Sharon Webster said. Webster recently moved off campus and has been able to keep a steady food source from living in the Slade co-op. Students on the points meal plan, or students living off-campus with no meal plan, often run into trouble because they lack budgeting experience, Rohrig said. “A lot of expenses come before food and food is almost the most dispensable,” she said. “So if you have to really cut back one week that’s where it’s gonna take a hit.” Getting nutritious food can be a problem too, Patel said. Sophomore Grace Skylstad, who is on a points plan, said “the biggest issue I’ve had is being able to get enough vegetables…There’s not really any cheaper options of vegetables.” She said she has people with unlimited plans steal fuit for her. Currently, food-insecure students must seek help from outside organizations, many of which are difficult to qualify for, Rohrig said.
After three years, some say Wellness has lost its way
her expectations as she has never had a personal experience with other WE students drinking or smoking in the dorms. But Sophomore WE resident Marissa Flynn said she is disappointed about the impact the program’s size has had on its quality. “They have expanded the program a lot, so it doesn’t feel specialized and it doesn’t feel like they care about us anymore,” she said. “I think they shifted their priorities.” Last year, she felt the program focused more on individual student needs, Flynn said. “As more students are being put into it, it feels like
ery
Recov
Since it began, the Wellness Environment has lost what initially attracted many students: an inclusive, holistic approach to wellbeing, several UVM community members have said. Though some are satisfied with what WE offers, others said that instead of focusing on the wellbeing of its students, the administrators are more concerned with increasing the community’s positive reputation — sometimes to the detriment of students with significant health needs. WE doesn’t focus on the health of students recovering from substance abuse problems, said Amy Boyd Austin, director of the Catamount Recovery Program, a University-run program for students in recovery from addiction.
Fitness
Brandon Arcari Ben Elfland Lee Hughes News Staff
Mentorship
This is part 3 of an investigation into the Wellness Environment.
Mindfullness
Feb. 20
Nutrition
The Cost of WE
Feb. 6
Wellness Environment
SElf
The Wellness App
Jan. 17
Assistant WE Director Jeff Rettew said his program doesn’t focus on counting calories and reinforces positive impacts of exercise on the brain. “We’ve tried to be really intentional,” he said. WE communicates with the Catamount Recovery Program, but there is no sub-community for recovering students. But students in recovery are welcome in WE, he said. “We’re trying to hold students accountable to the [WE code of conduct] that they signed, but in the case of the code being broken, we’re sending them to another UVM community that has resources for them,” Rettew said. Students are offered the option of Catamount Recovery Program if they have substance abuse issues, he said. The WE code changed Nov. 13. Students returning to the residence hall intoxicated and needing medical help will not lose their housing. Sophomore Sarah McLaughlin said she joined WE because of its substances policy. “I decided to join WE because I wanted a relatively alcohol and drug-free environment,” McLaughlin said. “I know technically campus is dry, but that’s not true and everyone knows that.” McLaughlin said WE met
Love
Blue Penis Gate
“WE has nothing to do with recovering students,” she said. “They have no place for students in recovery.” She feels that WE perpetuates the white, thin ideal her organization works to fight against because of its approach counting calories and tracking exercise, Boyd Austin said. “[It’s] like there’s a ‘one size fits all’ kind of thing as opposed to acceptance and doing what’s right for you and feeling good in your body,” she said. She also raised concerns with the WE zero-tolerance alcohol policy, which removes students from housing if they are found with alcohol. This is problematic because students are just relocated to a different building, she said. “It’s not like you’re kicked out of UVM and/or housing,” Boyd Austin said. “You just don’t get to live in WE. “So if the person has a problem with a substance, you’re pawning that problem off on some other residence hall to deal with, and that’s not cool.” Boyd Austin said Living Well is a space for all students, but WE is exclusive. The Wellness Environment, which serves select students, has been given less space and fewer resources, she said. The Catamount Recovery Program operates out of a shared space on campus.
it’s becoming more of a study than being about wellness anymore,” junior Meagan Cummings said. In fall 2016, 86.83 percent of students who were in WE returned to the program, according to Steve Szopinski, a University assessment and technology specialist in the Department of Student Affairs. In its first year, WE had 124 students, according to UVM records. It has grown over a threeyear period, first to 477 students, then to 1,160, according to Szopinski.