The Oracle M O N D AY, M A R C H 2 1 , 2 0 1 6 I V O L . 5 3 N O. 7 6
Inside this Issue
The Index
Opinion.......................................................4 Classifieds..............................................8 Lifestyle......................................................5 Crossword......................................8 sports.........................................................12
w w w. u s fo r a c l e. co m
U N I V E R S I T Y O F S O U T H F LO R I DA
Team builds rocket for NASA competition By Miki Shine C O - N E W S
L I FE STYLE
Telltale takes on Batman game. Page 5
Montage
S P ORTS USF baseball belts four home runs in 7-5 win. BACK
E D I T O R
A team of 10 students huddled together around an 11-foot, fiberglass rocket as they tried to protect it from the drizzle starting. Despite the rain early Saturday morning, the team launched its full-scale rocket for the first time. This year, USF students are participating in the NASA Student Launch Initiative, for the first time, which is a research-based competition. The eight-month-long competition focuses on designing, building and flying rockets. While most of the teams are from universities, the competition also includes high school and middle school teams in their own tier. Each team received a maximum budget of $7,500, according to the handbook, to spend on the rocket. “It is a national competition where students from universities across the country are competing to build a rocket and a [propulsion] system,” Nicholas Conde, president of the USF Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry, said. “Our goal is to build a rocket that can achieve an altitude of exactly
The team of 10 students built an 11-foot rocket mostly from fiberglass for the NASA Student Launch Initiative. The rocket launched Saturday morning with team members cheering it on. ORACLE PHOTO/MIKI SHINE
5,280 feet or one mile.” The team’s rocket also includes a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) component, which places it as one of 20 teams from across the nation
in that category. This means the team must come up with a unique method to capture, contain and launch a sample from the simulated Mars surface without human interaction.
“In addition, teams will develop a launch system that erects a rocket from a horizontal to vertical position, and has its igniter autono-
n See ROCKET on PAGE 2
USF receives high ranking in performance metrics By Abby Rinaldi C O - N E W S
E D I T O R
USF retained its status as one of the top universities in the state of Florida in the recently released Performance Based Funding scoring metrics from the Florida Board of Governors (BOG). Performance-based metrics are used to determine how much in Performance-Based Funding each state university receives from the Florida Legislature. The university is expecting this high ranking to secure millions of dollars in funding according to a press release from USF. The legislature has $500 mil-
lion in investments, $275 million of which was contributed by state universities and $225
of 79 on the metrics — behind FAU, UCF and UF — USF saw improvement across multiple
“Universities are offering a better product than they did just a few years ago with a better return on investment. This year’s performance outcomes demonstrate once again that incentive-based funding works in higher education” Tom Kuntz Board of Governors Chair
million from state investment, according to the BOG. How this $500 million will be distributed has yet to be announced. Coming in with a final score
categories in the metrics. Of the 10 categories being judged, USF improved in eight and fell in two, according to records released by the BOG.
USF saw the biggest improvement in the number of postdoctoral appointees with an 11.1 percent increase. The university was ranked first in Florida in graduate degrees awarded in areas of strategic emphasis, which includes accounting, education, global initiatives, health and STEM. USF came in second in the state with baccalaureate degrees in the same fields. USF saw a decrease in the percent of Pell Grant undergraduates and second year retention rate with a GPA above 2.0. Neither of these decreases exceeded one percent. There were improvements across the state system, put-
n See METRICS on PAGE 2