DEFENDING THE FIRST AMENDMENT SINCE 1911 TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 2019
@universitystar | universitystar.com
Volume 108, Issue 25
As San Marcos grows, so will construction By Christopher Green News Reporter
Turning Point USA is a conservative activist organization. PHOTO BY CARRINGTON J. TATUM
Free speech feud Student Government senators proposed banning TPUSA from campus, fueling the partisan divide on campus By Sierra Martin News Reporter
Student Government senators proposed banning TPUSA from campus, fueling the partisan divide on campus Student Government senators proposed a resolution during the April 1 meeting to bar conservative student organization Turning Point USA from the university on the grounds of protecting minority groups from effects of what they consider racist ideas. The legislation was met with conflict from all conservative groups on campus, who claimed it was a violation of their First Amendment right to free speech. In the legislation, the Texas State chapter of the national conservative organization was accused of harassing students and faculty, promoting white supremacy, illegally funding Student Government candidates, manipulating course content and protecting hate speech under the guise of the First Amendment. Last fall, TPUSA was accused of funding former Student Government President Brooklyn Boreing during her spring 2018 election campaign. According to its website, Turning Point USA’s mission is to educate students about the importance of fiscal
responsibility, free markets and limited government. The Student Government resolution has drawn the attention of Texas Governor, Greg Abbott, and TPUSA founder, Charlie Kirk. Gov. Abbott recently proposed a bill to the Texas Senate to designate all outdoor common areas as free-speech zones. Claudia Gasponi, general studies senior, is a senator for the University College and co-authored the legislation. Student Senator Trevor Newman, public administration sophomore, also helped write the resolution to remove TPUSA from campus. Gasponi and Newman maintain the legislation is to improve the safety of students and staff on campus. “This is not about free speech. It’s about harassment, electoral corruption and association with white supremacy. None of that is free speech," Gasponi said. "The legislation is about student safety." Stormi Rodriguez, political science and communications senior, has been the president of the Texas State chapter of TPUSA for two consecutive years. She claims to have no idea where most of the allegations come from and that they are all unsupported. SEE TPUSA PAGE 2
Construction strewn across San Marcos is expected to keep popping up, mostly as a way to match the city's growth. According to Laurie Moyer, director of engineering and capital improvement for the city of San Marcos, the city is increasing construction in San Marcos to better fortify infrastructure for the city's growth. Moyer said there are nearly 41 projects currently underway that deal with roadway development. “I think that one of the council’s strategic initiatives is maintaining and providing additional, affordable housing so that folks who move here that are workforce can purchase a house and have those options available,” Moyer said. “I think that you have to be mindful as you grow that things don’t get too expensive for people to live here.” Moyer also said some of the private construction is in response to the population growth. Since 2010, the city's population has grown by an estimated 17,826, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. "One of the sources of development is private development coming into the city responding to growth. That's a lot of the building and construction you see with new apartment complexes," said Moyer "That is just anticipated growth because of the projected growth over the next 20 years." Resident John Forssell said the growth is needed and a good thing for the city. “I think it’s a good thing because of the growth," Forssell said. "Otherwise, without it, the city would be congested with the traffic and that would be a negative effect on my life as a native to San Marcos." SEE CONSTRUCTION PAGE 2
Uncertain future for Cape’s Dam By Christopher Green News Reporter City Council's decision to designate Cape's Dam as a historic landmark or remove it altogether is still in limbo, months after the proposal to designate it as a historic landmark. On Jan. 29, City Council postponed the decision to designate Cape's Dam as a historic landmark. City staff is doing their research to decide on a vote within six months. Some residents and organizations want the dam to be removed while others want to have it preserved as a historic landmark. City Council had previously planned to remove the dam. However, on Oct. 4, 2018, the Historic Preservation Committee proposed to designate it as a historic landmark and maintain the
structure. Councilmember Ed Mihalkanin said the dam should stay and be designated as a historic landmark. “There are multiple reasons why I think we should repair the dam. It is historic and a part of the early history of San Marcos, and it’s really an example of early industry and helped make San Marcos in its early years,” Mihalkanin said. “A second reason is the dam was given to the city government with the understanding of maintaining it.” The San Marcos River Foundation has also weighed in on the topic of Cape’s Dam by speaking at council meetings and being engaged with the San Marcos River. Executive Director of San Marcos River Foundation Diane Wassenich said the dam should be removed. SEE LANDMARK PAGE 2
STAR FILE PHOTO