April 25 2016

Page 1

MONDAY APRIL 25, 2016

VOLUME 105 ISSUE 59 www.UniversityStar.com

Defending the First Amendment since 1911

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

F

UNIVERSITY

facebook.com/ universitystar

t E

@UniversityStar youtube.com/user/ theuniversitystar

Go to university star.com

FINANCIAL AID

FAFSA to start accepting applications in October By Bri Watkins NEWS REPORTER @briwatkins17

This fall, adjustments will be made to the Free Application for Federal Student Aid system to simplify the application process for aspiring students striving to attain a college degree. FAFSA is a program designed to financially support college students through the distribution of loans, grants, scholarships and work study programs. It is currently on a route of modification. Starting this fall, students will be able to apply for financial aid on Oct. 1, which is several months earlier than in the past. Incoming students are advised to apply for aid as soon as it becomes available in January, but won’t find out the cost for school until months later. By then, the deadline for choosing a college will quickly be approaching, but the new FAFSA structure could direct them to make an informed decision. Christopher Murr, director of financial aid, said this change is intended to beneficially impact students and families seeking financial assistance.

See FAFSA, Page 2

STAR FILE PHOTO

Students gather around the Vaquero Statue in front of Old Main April 13 to protest for free higher education.

Students fight for creation of student tuition advisory board By Brigeda Hernandez SENIOR NEWS REPORTER @brigeda_h

As tuition continues to increase at public universities nationwide, some students are pushing for more transparency when it comes to how their money is spent. On March 7, the Socialist Alternative organization at Texas State submitted a written proposal calling for a student advisory board that would be involved in decisions regarding tuition. Ryan Cook, political science senior, drafted the proposal.

“At some point we’d like to have actual dialogue with the administration about having some kind of representation,” Cook said. “It seems funny we’d ask for representation when we have a pretty extensive Student Government.” Cook said the extent to which Student Government can accurately represent students is questionable. Although the organization can submit its suggestions regarding tuition, nothing is binding. Last year, tuition at Texas State increased by 2.7 percent. Texas State,

along with the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University, have seen an above-average increase in tuition since 2003, according to a report by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Eric Algoe, vice president for finance and support services, said it is among the lowest percentage increases at the university in the past 10 years. The Board of Regents ultimately approves any tuition increase, but it is a collaborative effort among faculty, deans, and department chairs as they assess the strategic direction of

the university. “We have a very in-depth process,” Algoe said. “I think probably one of the best in the country, in terms of creating an academic plan.” Algoe said Texas State’s strategic plan considers matters such as fairly compensating employees, funding for new requirements such as employee insurance the Legislature may pass and expansion of graduate and undergraduate programs. Cook said the university’s current solution to rapid expansion seems to be bringing in more students,

which will be problematic because amenities such as dorms and parking will not increase fast enough. “With relatively little effort, we can draw a lot of attention to this issue,” Cook said. The previous Million Student March occurred last November, and gained international attention. The group attracted attention from The Guardian, and was featured on Fox Business. “Texas State was featured prominently,” Cook said. “Which I think shows

See TUITION, Page 2

UNIVERSITY

Students vote for SuperCat ring design, results of alumni pending By Bailey Buckingham SENIOR NEWS REPORTER @bcbuckingham

“SuperCats” could be a new potential nickname for Bobcats after students voted on the SuperCat logo design for the new class ring. Following recent trademark concerns with Texas A&M University, the administration at Texas State decided to create a new design. Current Bobcats had the opportunity to vote Feb. 24-26 on which design was favorable for the new Texas State class ring.

Joanne Smith, vice president for Student Affairs, said a website was designed and made available for students to provide feedback on the different options for class rings. The SuperCat logo design won with a substantial lead over the other options. The student voting was just one of a few rounds in the selection process. Now that the students have spoken, the vote has been left in the hands of alumni. Jennifer Scharlach, assistant director of marketing and membership for Texas

State Alumni, said the feedback they have received from former students is currently being sorted. “We sent out a survey to gather feedback last week,” Scharlach said. “It was opened for a week and now we are in the process of getting the information to the folks that will actually make the final decision.” Former students received an email from the Alumni Association containing a link to a survey including photos of the three design options, Scharlach said. Ellen Schneider, psychol-

ogy alumna, said she purchased her ring last year before graduation and she knows this may effect some alumnus emotionally but understands the change is necessary. “If I were to lose my ring I would absolutely be saddened by the change,” Schneider said. “But I haven’t, and I’m happy Texas State took the correct steps to avoid a trademark mishap so I understand why it needs to be done.” This is not a new process for Texas State. When the university transitioned

from Southwest Texas State University to Texas State University, the design of the ring was changed as well. Once the association finalizes the results, the decision will go back to the President’s Cabinet, Smith said. The cabinet will then analyze the results from both students and alumni to make a final decision. “Once we have looked at the results from everything the process then goes into the hands of Auxiliary Services,” Smith said. “They are the ones who work together with Balfour, the

ring distributor—the company that does the rings for us.” They are hoping this process will be finalized soon and the new ring design can then be available next December, Smith said. At this point, the timeline depends on a host of factors. “Maybe, maybe we can have it all finished by December,” Smith said. “But if not December, we will certainly have them ready by next May.”

CITY

Gregson: Open to considering Fair Chance ordinance By Lesly De Leon ASSISTANT NEWS EDITOR @leslyd28

One city councilmember is considering an ordinance that delays employers from asking about job candidates’ criminal history during the application process. Austin passed a similar Fair Chance Hiring ordinance March 24 requiring private employers to delay asking about job applicants’ criminal history until a conditional job offer has been made. Violating the ordinance will result in fines. “I certainly can’t speak for my council members, but I think it’ll be something that we would consider,” said Councilman Scott Gregson, Place 5. Gregson said he agrees with the ordinance and be-

lieves it can provide those seeking employment a second chance. “I think there’s a legitimate reason to give people a chance,” he said. “At that point in time, they’ve paid their debt to society. So, I think it’s a very gracious and fair consideration that Austin has come up with.” Gregson said an individual with a criminal history could be a valuable employee. “If they’ve paid their debt to society and come out and shown themselves to be good standing citizens, I could see how there would be a value in hiring someone like that,” Gregson said. Bradley Hurt, public administration senior and president of College Republicans, said he does not agree with the Fair Chance

ordinance in its current language. “It’s not a good ordinance because it doesn’t actually shield anybody’s background. It’s just delaying the background check,” Hurt said. “If anything, it’s just pushing that hard decision back until the very end of the process, if somebody’s trying to get this job.” Hurt said if San Marcos city council members considered passing a similar ordinance, he would review its differences with Austin’s, but wouldn’t support it if it was too alike. Naomi Narvaiz, state Republican executive committeewoman, said she doesn’t agree with Austin’s ordinance and might not support a similar one in San Marcos. “We have to look at what

ASHLEY GALVAN STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER Austin’s new ordinance, called the Fair Chance Ordinance, delays an employer running a criminal background check until a job candidate is about to be offered a job.

San Marcos’ council would

See FAIR CHANCE, Page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.