VOLUME 102, ISSUE 42
www.UniversityStar.com
Defending the First Amendment since 1911
TUESDAY
JANUARY 15, 2013
Cape’s Camp soon to become student housing By Karen Zamora News Reporter Residents voiced their concerns through emails, petitions and during the November elections, but it was not enough to convert the largest undeveloped property on the San Marcos River into parkland. City council members voted 5-2 during their Jan. 7 meeting to approve zoning changes that would allow the development of a 306-unit, 1,000-bedroom student housing complex at Cape’s Camp called The Woodlands of San Marcos. Less than half of the 45 acres approved for zoning will be donated by the Georgiabased Dovetail Development to the city to be used as parkland as part of the proposal. The 20 acres will include Thompson’s Island. Mayor Daniel Guerrero and councilmembers Kim Porterfield, Place 1, Wayne Becak, Place 4, Ryan Thomason, Place 5 and Shane Scott, Place 6, voted in favor of the development and the 20-acre parkland donation. Councilmembers Jude Prather, Place 2, and John Thomaides, Place 3, voted against the student apartments. “I really wasn’t impressed with the 23 acres they were going to give us,” Prather said. “It looked like your typical apartment—nothing that wowed me or stood out. Nothing worth giving up that land.” The vote followed more than four hours of public comment, most in opposition, at the Jan. 7 meeting. Voters also voiced their desire for the property to be parkland in November. In a non-binding referendum on the Nov. 6 election ballot, more than 75 percent of San Marcos voters said they wanted the 45-acre tract property to be acquired as parkland. However, the two other resolutions, involving the property being acquired through eminent domain or raising taxes, failed to pass by a majority of the voters. “The vast majority said we want this as parkland,” Thomason said at the Jan. 7 city council meeting. “The same percentage said ‘Don’t send us a bill. People really are all over the board on this subject.” Kevin Romig, associate professor in Texas State’s geography department, was one of the 60 community members who spoke against the student housing complex and the zoning change of the land from a Multifamily 12 (meaning 12 units to an acre) to a Planned Development District. Romig said there are other creative ways Cape’s Camp could be used instead of as student apartments that are an inconvenient distance from campus and will cost the city and university to accommodate them. Dave Mulkey, the developer of The
READ Cape’s camp, PAGE 3
RIVER RUNS ‘DRY’
John Casares, Staff Photographer
A new city ordinance bans the display and consumption of alcohol in all city parks including Rio Vista.
Alcohol ban brings changes to San Marcos parks By Taylor Tompkins Assistant News-Editor City parks will have new rules and a new atmosphere under an ordinance limiting alcohol use on premises. The ordinance, which went into effect Jan. 1, bans public consumption or display of alcohol in city parks. Park patrons are allowed to have alcohol in the water and rented areas such as pavilions. Plastic foam products, including coolers, ice chests and cups will also be prohibited. The ban in San Marcos parks is similar to the highly publicized New Braunfels “can ban.” Disposable containers are now impermissible in the Guadalupe and Comal River parks within the city limits under the can ban. Some tubing outfitters reported an estimated 40 percent decrease in business last spring and summer, the first tourism season since the ordinance went into effect, according to reports from the New Braunfels Herald-Zeitung. According to a report by The Dallas Morning News, fewer citations have been issued and fewer arrests have been made since the can ban went into effect. Like the can ban in New Braunfels, the
Director of Development Services Photo courtesy of Matthew Lewis
By Minerva Hernandez-Garcia Special to the Star According to Matthew Lewis, director of Development Services, an estimated 33,000 people will move to San Marcos
by 2035. Lewis discusses how the rapid growth will affect everything from housing to transportation, and how the City of San Marcos plans to accommodate for the increase in citizens. MG: What changes need to be made in the city’s infrastructure to accommodate for its growth? ML: What we’re doing right now is updating the Comprehensive Master Plan and allocating the population to appropriate areas as determined by the citizens of San Marcos. After that Comprehensive Master Plan, what we’ll do is go back and realign our Capital Improvement Program to make sure infrastructure goes in the appropriate growth areas. MG: How is parking and traffic going to be affected by the population increase? ML: Parking and traffic is going to be something we have to be conscious of with the university. One of the things we are trying to do is diversify housing around the
READ LEWIS, PAGE 3
San Marcos ordinance also aims to cut down on the number of issues and arrests at the river. “The hope is that we have fewer incidents and fewer accidents that are alcohol related,” said Jeff Caldwell, park ranger supervisor. “That’s obviously one of the goals in the passage of the ordinance. The other was just to maintain a really nice family atmosphere at the parks.” Caldwell said the ordinance also helps to create a consistency in policy throughout the city so that all parks have the same rules. “We already had some parks where alcohol was not allowed,” Caldwell said. “At state parks it’s not allowed, at county parks it’s not allowed and at university parks it’s not allowed. It was really just trying to get an across-the-board rule that was a little bit easier to follow and understand.” Park rangers and San Marcos police officers will patrol parks and give warnings to violators or issue citations to those not compliant with the new ordinance. Littering violations in city parks will also cost more under the ordinance and perpetrators will face $250 fines.
Caldwell said since alcohol is still legal to drink on the river, there will be access points at City Park and Rio Vista Park so river patrons can bring alcohol in and out of the water. Rebecca Ybarra-Ramirez, executive director of the San Marcos Convention and Visitor Bureau, said million of tourists visit San Marcos a year. Ybarra-Ramirez said it has yet to be determined whether the ban will affect recreational tourism numbers during the spring and summer months when tubers, canoe enthusiasts and kayakers descend upon the San Marcos River. She said some people enjoy an alcohol-free atmosphere. Roger Astin, chemistry sophomore and river-goer, said he has never had any trouble with drunken river patrons or inappropriate behavior. Astin said he feels the ban will be detrimental to the city. “The tourists and families in San Marcos are already used to the environment of being in a college town,” Astin said. “It’s the people who sell alcohol that this is going to hurt the most. The people that would be any problem to families and
READ alcohol ban, PAGE 3
Commissioners vote to lift burn ban due to recent rain By Adrian Omar Ramirez News Reporter Hays County commissioners voted unanimously Jan. 8 in favor of lifting the county’s burn ban. Burn bans go into effect when the county has a rank of 575 according to the KeetchByram Drought Index. The drought index can reach between 600 and 700 during the summer months, but recent measures provided by Texas A&M AgriLife Research have shown an index between 300 and 500 for much of Hays County. Only small portions have seen drought indexes of 500 or higher. Despite this improvement, Clint Browning, assistant fire marshal, reminded the commissioners court that the county is still experiencing dryness. “Even though it is raining, we are still very dry,” Browning said. “Everything’s dead. There is some moisture, but we have a situation that what is there is not just dry, it’s dead. Raining on it isn’t going to make the grass green.” Browning spoke in place of Fire Marshal Mark Chambers who was hospitalized
earlier during the week. Browning warned about the amount of dead material in the county and said those who do start burning should exercise caution. Under a burn ban, outdoor burning is prohibited in the county’s unincorporated areas with certain exceptions, such as grilling on gas or coal. Commissioner Will Conley, Precinct 3, said another such example could be local farmers who burn cacti to use as cattle feed, a situation he said he discussed with Chambers. “(Chambers) said that was an acceptable practice, as long as (the farmers) would be held accountable,” Conley said. “That’s their livelihood. That’s reasonable.” Each city in the county has their own ordinances for restricting burning whenever the commissioners declare a ban. Wimberley’s city council recently passed an ordinance to enact burn bans whenever the county does so, similar to Kyle and Buda. San Marcos, however, prohibits outdoor burning within city limits. “I would encourage municipalities to
READ BURN BAN, PAGE 3