Ultra Vires Vol 12 Issue 3: 2010 November

ULTRA

VIRES

THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW

VOLUME 12, ISSUE 3

CDO screws up

BY UV STAFF

U of T Law's Career Development Office has once again come under fire for its handling of the employment process – 1L through 3L, for summer and articling alike.

Though mistakes were made in the OCI process, the consensus seems to be that the CDO does a decent job preparing students for Bay Street, but fails students in a great many other respects.

One of the CDO's main failings, noted across the board, is its Toronto-centrism.

While it is understandable that the CDO would focus its resources on placing students in the school's locality and the largest legal market in Canada, many students were concerned about the fact that they were not informed of application deadlines in places like Vancouver and Calgary. Furthermore, the general OCI prep session was held on October 12, two days before the Toronto OCIs and nearly two weeks after the Vancouver/Calgary OCI date.

Similarly, students applying for government positions found little help. The CDO provided a list of “substantive questions,” a list ultimately judged to be useless by many students. Other schools’ students had lists of actual questions posed to prior years’ applicants.

In response to advance OCI feedback from Ultra Vires, the CDO has gone on the defensive. The Office agreed that its “government employment related resources are deficient,” and has undertaken to create a Government Guide that includes sample interview questions for the various offices. In an email circulated to the 2L class, the CDO asked students for help: “We are … in your hands to provide us with this information.

The Guide can and will, at least to some extent, only be as good as the information you share.” The email, addressed individually to CONTINUED at page 2

UV INDEX

• THE SLS BUDGET...PP.4, 22 • LAW STUDENT LAUNCHES

CHARTER CHALLENGE...P.7

• OCI SURVEY...PP.10-19

• HALLOWE’EN PHOTOS...PP.16-17 • US ELECTIONS...P.20

• TATTOOS OF UT LAW...PP.26-27

• NAPPING STERN...P.30

www.ultravires.ca

November 22, 2010

Hallowe’en Husslin’ in Flavelle

Diego Beltran (1L) was gettin’ that paper at the SLS Hallowe’en Party.

For more pictures from the Hallowe’en party, see the centre spread.

U of T tops Toronto OCI cycle

Toronto firms hire record number of U of T students during November in-firm week The numbers have rolled in and according to data compiled by Ultra Vires, U of T has emerged as the most successful law school in the 2010 Toronto recruiting process for the second consecutive year, with at least 101 2L students earning summer positions. The 101 student hires from U of T are a new record, topping last year’s mark of 100 student hires. Traditionally, U of T and Osgoode have finished neck and neck with virtually the same number of students hired. However, U of T earned 12 more jobs than Osgoode this year, with Osgoode declining 9 student hires from last year. The 89 Osgoode students hired is their lowest total since 2006.

According to the Ultra Vires survey, which was completed by 123 2L students at U of T, 75.2% of respondents received at least one offer, an increase over the record low 69.0% who reported receiving an offer last year.

42.6% of survey respondents had the luxury of receiving 2 or more offers

BY ABRAR HUQ (3L)

during November interview week.

The vast majority of U of T students are headed to full-service firms, with 83 of the 101 hires accepting offers with these firms. The “Seven Sister” firms account for nearly half of all U of T hires alone, with the 6 Seven Sister firms that reported their hiring data to Ultra Vires hiring a whopping 47 U of T students. U of T placed over twice as many students with the Sister firms as Osgoode (23) or Western (19). This impressive number was undoubtedly buoyed by the student class hired by Blakes, which vaguely resembles a U of T small group, with 17 students from U of T represented in their 35-student class.

There was a marked shift in the performance of the Ontario schools outside of Toronto. Western broke the 50 student mark for the first time ever, finishing in 3rd place with 52 hires. Surprisingly, Windsor made a big jump, earning 12 more jobs than last year, finishing in 4th place with 43 students

hired. Ottawa made a similar leap, improving 9 jobs from last year, finishing with 40 positions. These big jumps may have come at the expense of Queen’s who placed just 40 students in Toronto this November, 13 fewer than last year.

Toronto recruiters rarely looked outside of Ontario for talent, as they hired just 27 students from out-of-province.

This is a staggering drop from as recently as 2007, when students from law schools outside of Ontario earned 65 jobs.

The Toronto recruiting cycle comes after the completion of New York hiring. It is unclear how many students accepted offers from New York firms, but at least 5 respondents to the Ultra Vires survey on Toronto recruiting indicated that they were participating in a split-summer arrangement between a Toronto firm and a New York firm.

See full survey results and OCI analysis starting at page 10

Masthead 10 years ago in UV

From the archives, the top stories from the Nov. 2000 issue

Bridge Week Seen as Success

This year’s first bridge week was on homelessness, and generally, seems to have been a success. Roxanna Sultan remarked that “in general, the bridge was well done, and very interesting.”

However, she also thought that “the overall tone of the bridge was pretty leftwing. Obviously, no one wants homelessness to be a continuing problem, and we definitely understood the criticisms of Mike Harris’ policies. However, we never really learned the justification behind why they were instituted in the first place.”

This year, the bridge weeks focus on problems, no perspectives, so that the multidimensional character of the law can be represented as it relates to a pressing and timely legal issue. Further, the number of bridge weeks has been reduced to three from four and they are on the topics of homelessness, residential schools and the genome project. The method of evaluation for the bridges has also been changed, as students need only write one “long” (10-page) paper on a bridge topic of their own choosing. For the other two bridges, the paper requirements are shorter and they are marked on a pass/fail basis.

CDO - from page 1

students, caused some to worry that their anonymity from the UV survey had been breached.

There were also glitches with the OCI process itself. The CDO had reached out to 1L volunteers a month in advance, but did not end up communicating the schedule to them. Additionally, the interview booth diagrams handed out to terrified 2Ls were printed in reverse. A number of 2Ls started their day with the wrong room.

3Ls have not been exempt from unwelcome surprises. On November 10, they received an email from the CDO containing a letter from the LSUC registrar. The letter, dated September 20th, informed them that they had less than a month to

register for 2011 licensing examinations, or they would face late filing fees. The CDO noted that they had only recently received the letter, but did not weigh in on whether they had an independent obligation to let students know about vital steps to becoming a lawyer.

On the bright side, a number of students have noted that the CDO has greatly improved over previous years, and Emily and Jennifer have been singled out as extraordinarily helpful. But it will require some significant work to cure the general malaise about career services at this law school. The feeling was crystallized rather gracefully by an anonymous 2L: “great for Bay Street, shit for everything else.”

Law Games Contentious

The Students’ Law Society (SLS) has agreed to donate $600 to Law Games after heated debate about whether the funding is appropriate. Various groups of students became involved in the discussion to help students bear the $550-per-person cost attached to this year’s event to be held in Calgary in January.

According to SLS President Anna-Maria di Stasio, the Law Games Committee submitted a budget proposal requesting $1,600. When some people at the open budget meeting voiced disapproval at the idea of the SLS providing assistance to what some perceive to be a “drinking binge,” a town hall meeting was arranged.

Between twenty and thirty students from both camps showed up. Supporters of financial assistance argued that the Games are a very important social activity.

Aboriginal Law Review to Get Underway

Currently there is no Aboriginal law review in the country, but if Justin Denis (III) has his way that will soon change. With funding from a Bay Street law firm in the waiting and the faculty expressing its support, Denis and his volunteers hope to launch a publication that will be a forum for aboriginal law issues. Submissions from the United States, New Zealand and Australia, as well as Canada, will be sought. Indeed the title of publication may turn out to be the “Indigenous Law Journal,” as the term “indigenous” is seen as being more widely used at the international level than “aboriginal.”

ULTRA VIRES

is the student newspaper of the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto.

Editors - In - Chief News Editor Opinion and Editorial Features Diversions First Year Content Business/Ad Manager Photo Editor Web Manager Copy Editors

Aaron Christoff & Abrar Huq Ashley McKenzie Brendan Morrison Amanda Melvin Caroline Samara Matthew Brown Robin Elliott Joshua Chan Yingdi Wu Andrea Wong & Annie Tayyab

Communications Centre, Falconer Hall 84 Queens Park Crescent, Toronto ON M5S 2C5 ultra.vires@utoronto.ca (416) 946 - 7684

Page 16 for more Hallowe’en photos, with fewer disturbing photos of UV staff. We promise.

Contributors Jeremy Ablaza, Karim Amlani, Todd Brayer, Matthew Brown, Joshua Chan, Lee Chitiz, Aaron Christoff, Michael Collinge, Cody Cornale, Wayne Cunningham, Brauna Doidge, Luke Gill, Mike Hamata, Stephen Holinski, Stephen Hutchison, Abrar Huq, Katie Ionson, Michael Laskey, Jean Lee, Atrisha Lewis, Marty McKendry, Ashley McKenzie, Brendan Morrison, Will Morrison, Emily Orchard, Anna Pippus, Jennifer Poon, Jay Potter, Aaron Rankin, Azim Remani, Caroline Samara, Michael Serebriakov, Benjamin Sharma, Jared Spindel Ultra Vires is an editorially autonomous newspaper. We are open to contributions which reflect diverse points of view, and our contents do not necessarily reflect the views of the Faculty of Law, the Students’ Law Society (SLS), or the editorial board. We welcome contributions from students, faculty, and other interested persons. Ultra Vires reserves the right to edit contributions for length and content.

Advertising inquiries should be sent to the attention of the business manager at ultra.vires@utoronto.ca.

The next issue will be published on January 26, 2011 and the deadline for submissions is January 21, 2011. The submission limit is 1000 words.

The SLS Budget, a McMerger, a Charter challenge and more...

Whither articling?

As law students, we naturally look forward to graduating at the end of a hardfought three years. With that said, I’ve always felt that the end of law school must seem pretty anticlimactic, because that shiny new J.D. (and its accompanying mountain of debt) we receive does not, on its own, give us the right to practice law or even call ourselves lawyers.

Instead, our professional degree is merely an entry requirement that, coupled with the successful completion of LSUC examinations and an approved “articling” period, opens the door to be called to the bar. This prompts the question: Why is a law degree insufficient to become a lawyer? Does articling truly provide value, or is it an anachronistic tradition that has outlived its usefulness?

Proponents of articling submit that law school (at least in its current incarnation) does not develop the practical skills that are required to become a competent lawyer. There is some truth to this: while students who graduate with significant clinical and/or summer employment experiences may develop client

BY JAY POTTER (2L)

counseling, research, and courtroom advocacy skills, there are likely large practice management gaps that no course or extra-curricular activity reliably fills. Articling also enables new members of the profession to be guided into practice under the watch of an experienced lawyer who acts as a confidant and mentor, instilling not only the skills but also the values, ethics, and responsibilities that accompany membership in the legal profession. Additionally, articling’s defenders sometimes focus on its regulatory or “public protection” function, acknowledging that new practitioners will invariably make mistakes and articling lets these occur in a controlled environment where the “damage” is limited and mitigated by the presence of a supervising principal. Lastly, articling acts as one of the last remaining links to the historical and traditional approach to legal education: prior to the late nineteenth century, learning the “craft” of our profession was always done in a master/apprentice environment instead of in a classroom.

Recently though, articling’s value has been called into question. Lorne Sossin, a former U of T law professor and the current Dean of Osgoode Hall, gave a presentation this October at the inaugural Clinical Legal Education Conference at Western.

He argued that, while articling should remain an option for those who want it, the “articling requirement” should be a b o l i s h e d Lorne Sossin: In dreams, we talk to you and replaced with several “paths” to the call, of which articling would be but one of many choices open to law students. His argument, available on his blog (http://deansblog.osgoode.yorku.ca/20 10/10/should-articling-be-abolished/), summarizes many of the contemporary

NEWS concerns with articling. First, it is too dependent on the cyclical nature of the legal employment market, increasing the risk that when the market is “down,” some students will be trapped without articles and any viable path to certification. Related to this argument, securing an articling job is not strictly speaking as merit-based as other requirements, such as admission to law school or the successful completion of a law degree; further, articling positions simply may not be available in certain practice areas.

Third, the quality of the articling experience varies tremendously and does not always live up to the ideals of its proponents (this applies equally to “prestigious” articles like a job at a top-flight firm or clerking at a high-level court, where students may not learn much about the actual practice of law). Finally, Dean Sossin notes that the articling requirement acts as a barrier to increasing diversity in the profession, and that those who tend not to secure articles are CONTINUED on page 6

Section 10(b) of the Charter – your right to automated legal advice? The case of R. v. Sinclair

I like this judgment. Not because it was a win for Charter rights, or because it interpreted section 10(b) in a broad manner consistent with its purpose – it wasn’t and it didn’t – but because Binnie J. wrote a terrific dissent. But before I get to that I should probably explain Sinclair.

For those who haven’t taken the time to read the riveting tale of R. v. Sinclair in its entire 115-page glory, let me repeat the punch line. This is the third case in the Supreme Court’s interrogation trilogy: R. v. Oickle, R. v. Singh, and the coup de grâce: R. v. Sinclair. This trilogy holds that the police can lie during interrogation to induce a confession; that the right to silence does not require the police to stop asking questions (after all, how meaningful is a right to silence if you can’t repeatedly assert it!); and that your section 10(b) right to legal counsel is spent after you’ve spoken with a lawyer, briefly, before your interrogation. Isn’t it nice of the Supreme Court to lay that all out clearly for us? At least now there won’t be any confusion.

Sinclair is slightly more complicated than I mentioned previously. According

BY STEPHEN HOLINSKI (2L)

to the majority, situations may arise dur- place in the interrogation room. The ing the course of an interrogation that Ontario Criminal Lawyer’s Association will require the police to facilitate further seems to think that the role of a lawyer requests to speak with legal counsel. The whose client is facing interrogation is beclearest of these situations is where the coming pretty marginal. They go so far accused’s jeopardy has changed. If that as to state that the lawyer’s role could be assault charge suddenly changes to a “accomplished by a recorded message: possible murder charge, then a nice chat You have reached counsel. Keep your with counsel may be in order. And it may mouth shut. Press one to repeat this even be required under our Charter! message.”

But aside from those situations, what This wonderful statement is immortaldoes section 10(b) really get you? Noth- ized in Binnie J.’s great dissent at paraing, if you aren’t graph 86 of “Y OU HAVE REACHED COUNSEL . being interrogated Sinclair. Clearly, by the police. But for KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. PRESS contrary to the those who face interanalysis of the maONE TO REPEAT THIS MESSAGE.” rogation, section jority, Binnie J. 10(b) gets you a thinks that section quick phone call to a lawyer – probably 10(b) guarantees a broader right to couna lawyer you’ve never met or spoken to sel. Under Binnie’s interpretation of secbefore, but that’s beside the point. Now, tion 10(b), interrogators would be if you’re thinking that this doesn’t sound required to allow reasonable requests to at all like a Canadian version of Law and speak with counsel. Requests made for Order where a confident lawyer advises the purpose of delays or distractions are his client in the face of relentless police not “reasonable requests.” Binnie J. goes interrogation, then you are correct. A on to list a number of objective factors clear majority of the Supreme Court that will help interrogators make this held that under the Canadian system of judgment. The Supreme Court majority “checks and balances,” a lawyer has no held that Justice Binnie’s reasonableness

test is “so vague that it is impractical.”

We simply cannot leave police officers – professional police officers – to make a reasonable legal judgment... except when it comes to search and seizure, or the decision to initiate a random road stop, or the choice to detain someone on the street for questioning, or... well, you get the point. Okay, one more: the Supreme Court majority in Sinclair held that the police also have to give the detainee a reasonable amount of time to contact counsel before interrogation. As Justice Binnie points out, “There’s that ‘reasonably’ word linked to police judgment again!” All of the above examples are taken from Binnie J.’s rather persuasive dissent. But alas, the majority did not see reason.

So what is the moral of the story?

Don’t put yourself in a position to be interrogated by the police: it doesn’t sound like fun, and it doesn’t sound like the Charter can save you. Also, if you get counsel’s answering machine, make sure to hit repeat a few times – I’m sure you’re not getting billed for this service... yet. And read the dissent by Binnie J. It’s worth the time.

4

NEWS

SLS publishes annual budget

BY KARIM AMLANI (3L), KATIE IONSON (3L), AZIM REMANI (2L)

On November 10 2010, the Student e.g., an allocation of $150 for lunch proAffairs (Affairs) branch of the Students’ visions, $50 for non-lunch-food events, Law Society (SLS) passed a bylaw amend- $20 for speaker gifts, $5 for movie ment to institutionalize the publication rentals, $15 for movie snacks, and $3 for of the SLS budget and financial state- printing costs. As well, no funding was ments at the beginning and end of each provided for meetings or year-end parties year, respectively. The rationale behind restricted to the membership of a club, the amendment is to bolster the trans- paid student positions (excluding the parency with which the SLS handles SLS’s Public Interest Advocacy Summer funding from students. Since a portion Employment Program), or transportation of every law student’s fees is allocated to costs. Where expenses were not covered the SLS, it is natural that students would by these guidelines or an event benefitted want to know how the money is being a disproportionate segment of the stuspent. Moreover, financial transparency dent population, Affairs debated the will encourage increased accountability. amount to be allocated based on broader Publication of the budget and financial factors such as, e.g., benefits accrued to statements are an important addition to the law school as a whole, the extent to the SLS’s larger financial management which an event encourages diversity at system. Early in the fall semester, the VP the law school, the success of similar Student Affairs and SLS treasurers work events in the past, and how popular the closely with Affairs representatives to event is projected to be. Next year, the prepare an annual SLS will provide budget. Once club these guidelines to funding applications club executives in are received, each advance of the apapplication is careplication process to fully reviewed by the facilitate club planentire Affairs comning. This year, the mittee. Funding alloSLS was called upon cation decisions are to distribute reached only after $14,510.00 and rerigorous discussion ceived applications and by committee from 34 student votes (the budget as groups requesting a a whole is also subtotal of $62,281.72. ject to committee The Public Intervoting). Addition- The bouncy castle features prominently in est Advocacy Sumthe SLS budget ally, club expenses mer Employment are reviewed for their compliance with Program mentioned above also warrants approved allowances and are paid out on comment as it represents the single a reimbursement basis. All SLS accounts largest expenditure in the budget are managed within Simply Accounting ($18,000.00). Following an application Premium software. process, the program pays the wages of The SLS is also required by the Office three law students every summer to work of the Vice-Provost, Students to undergo at public interest organizations. Each stua professional audit each fiscal year. Fee dent at the school pays $30 towards the payments collected by the university on program as per a 2006 SLS bylaw. Past rebehalf of the SLS – the SLS fees that ap- cipients have worked on a wide variety of pear on ROSI financial accounts – are matters including assisting in refugee not paid to the SLS until the audited fi- claims by LGBT claimants for the Sexual nancial statements are received and ac- Orientation and Gender Identity Refugee cepted by the university. These audits are Project, and assisting in the provision of currently completed by the accounting legal services to bring high impact law refirm, Bonaccorso and Associates. form cases on behalf of disadvantaged Since this is the first time the SLS has individuals at the Community Legal widely disclosed individual club funding Clinic in Orillia. decisions, a brief explanation of how While financial transparency was the these amounts are arrived at may be help- motivation for a published budget, sevful in reviewing the budget. Each funding eral benefits are expected to follow from application includes the club’s expected the new bylaw. First, publishing the revenues and expenses, divided according budget and financial statements will allow to the club’s planned events. These budg- the SLS to better project revenues and ets are considered against a set of general expenses in the future. Second, publicaguidelines designed to focus Affairs’ dis- tion of the budget will provide an excelcussion, and are arrived at by considering lent impetus for further improvements to the total amount of funding requested the financial management of the SLS from clubs, the money available for distri- more generally. Third, providing students bution, and the probable cost of activi- with financial information regarding the ties. This year these guidelines included, SLS will lead to awareness about the

ULTRA VIRES

SLS budget 2010-11

SLS Budget, 2010-2011 Revenues: Fees

Expenses Audit Charges Banking Charges Bouncy Castle for Dean's BBQ Club Funding Aboriginal Law Students Association ALAS Black Law Students Society Business Law Society Canadian Lawyers Abroad East Asian Law Students' Association Entertainment Law Society Environmental Law Club Feminist Law Students Association French Conversation Club Health Law Club In Vino Veritas International Law Society Intramurals JD/MBA Jewish Law Society Law and Development Law Follies Law Games Let's Play Board Games!

Litigation Association Mental Health Law Society Out in Law Peer Mentorship Program Senators' Club SPINLaw Student Animal Legal Defense Fund Tax Law Society TIP V-Day Women and the Law

Reserve for Second Semester Funding Coffee Houses Goodwill Events Law Ball Office Supplies Osgoode Basketball Game Public Interest Advocacy Summer Employment Program Reserve for O-Week

work of the SLS, particularly the Affairs branch. Finally, publication of the budget will hopefully lead to higher engagement amongst students in the governance of the SLS and in the broader law school community. For all these reasons, publication of the SLS budget and financial

51,710.00 $51,710.00

400.00 173.00 200.00 300.00 136.00 350.00 213.00 295.00 350.00 50.00 435.00 150.00 300.00 1,670.00 100.00 256.00 348.00 400.00 500.00 175.00 279.00 309.00 300.00 400.00 200.00 400.00 157.00 280.00 440.00 382.00 563.00 3,999.00

4,400.00 150.00 1,000.00 14,510.00

600.00 100.00 2,500.00 200.00 500.00

18,000.00 9,750.00 $51,710.00

statements constitutes a step forward for the organization’s transparency and accountability measures, and will hopefully enrich the relationship between the SLS and its members, the student body.

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

NEWS

2+2=5: McMillan merges with Lang Michener

Just over a week ago, McMillan LLP and Lang Michener LLP announced that they were merging. UV had a chance to sit down with Ryan Walker, one of McMillan’s newest recruits. He was just hired through the fall recruitment process.

AM: How excited are you to join the Lang Michener team?

RW: I am very excited to be joining the Lang Michener team. I think Lang Michener adds a lot to McMillan in terms of practice areas and expertise. I’m looking forward to taking advantage of those resources.

AM: Has there been any communication from the firm about changes to student experience?

RW: The convenient thing is that McMillan and Lang Michener had very similar summer programs before the merger. Both offered litigation or corporate rotations for the summer, so there will be less adjustment for all of us. I am sure that the general summer experience will not be overly different from what we were promised pre-offer.

AM: Did McMillan and Lang Michener hire fewer students than in previous years?

RW: Yes, but there could be any number of reasons for decreased hiring.

AM: How do you think the merger

BY ASHLEY MCKENZIE (2L)

will affect your hireback chances for articling and associate positions?

RW: I don’t know. As a general observation, I believe that all firms will use various criteria at the time of they make those decisions, including the state of the economy, clients’ needs, and practice area needs at the time. Of course, the purpose of the merger was to grow, not to shrink. While this doesn’t mean that a certain number of people will be hired back, I think it would be counter-intuitive to shed a number of students at those stages. However, hireback decisions will be made closer to that time. At the moment, they likely don’t have a strict rubric.

AM: Do you think you’ll end up in the Lang Michener office space?

RW: Another convenient thing about this merger is that the two are both located in Brookfield Place. This could reduce a number of headaches in the merger process. I have not been told about office allocation, but I am confident that it will be done in a logical fashion. I could be in the Lang Michener floors. It depends on which rotation I

choose to do, and where they put the student offices. It’s at least a possibility. I have been told that they have very nice offices.

AM: Would you make a different choice during fall recruitment if you knew McMillan would be a larger firm?

RW: I have been asked this question a lot. I think the merger really strengthens McMillan and is an incentive to join the firm rather than a disincentive. The merger has resulted in a greater strengthening of the practice areas and has added offices, including a Hong Kong office which is an increasingly important market.

AM: During the fall recruitment process, the question of “fit” was on

5

everyone’s minds. Do you think “fit” will be an issue given the merger?

RW: I can’t speak to how I would have fit with Lang Michener because I didn’t go as far with them in the recruitment process as I did with McMillan. McMillan has a great culture that I think I fit well with. I have been assured that every effort will be made to maintain that culture.

AM: Did the firm ever mention the possibility of the merger during the fall recruitment process?

RW: It was not mentioned during the interview process because it was under wraps until the announcement was made last week. There was a rumour published with the National Post some time that week. I didn’t turn my mind to it, and there was no discussion of it at the firm.

I’m fine with that – it’s the nature of mergers. They had valid reasons for not saying anything official before the announcement. After the announcement was made, they immediately called the incoming summer and articling students to let us know what was going on and answer any questions or concerns we had. I couldn’t have asked for more.

6

LPPE Week: A participant’s perspective

“Nay, I am too much i’the sun.”

BY LUKE GILL (1L)

It was November 2nd, and the year was 2010. The sun shone brightly, but it failed to break the numbing cold that accompanies most November days. A more riskaverse person would have seen this as a premonition, a warning. “Oh,” such a person would cry out. “How could a day be so bright and promising in form, and yet so frigid and barren in substance?”

Alas, I am no such person. Rather, I am quite the opposite; I wear my heart on my sleeve, so to speak. Many a time my heart has been breached and exposed for all to see in the name of love, and many a time my heart has been broken. And so it was that I failed to read the signs on that arctic November day. So it was that my heart was broken once more.

Alas, there I was, naively admiring the sun. As I write this, the mere thought of my ignorance makes me choke and sputter. Often, while dwelling on the past as I am now, I wonder if I should just end it all. Life is very long. But no more of that; I am getting ahead of myself.

So, I was leisurely walking to the 89 Chestnut Conference Centre for the law school’s intensive week on Legal Process,

NEWS

Professionalism and Ethics. The events of that day promised to be explosive and stimulating, filled with an exotic array of presentations and discussions. I was very excited. In fact, my excitement was almost to the point of requiring that I inhale from a brown paper bag. This was something my physician had instructed me to do in times of great stress, such as when a professor ignorantly selects another student’s raised hand over mine during lecture. It was in this emotionally charged state that I arrived at my fated destination.

I cheerfully strode into the conference centre and made my way to the designated room. To my great surprise, I discovered that there was a tempting offering of refreshments just outside the door. I nimbly danced around the tables, grabbing a sample of each and every flavour. But then, as the planetary alignment had predetermined, I was bumped by a young woman. She looked up at me, startled, and apologized. Her eyes and hair were a rich brown, and her tightly pursed lips may as well have been a long, pointed blade lodged in my chest. I mutCONTINUED on page 7

Articling - from page 3

disproportionately from equity-seeking groups (and to this I would also add foreign-trained lawyers).

If the articling requirement were abolished, other options could include changing the law school curriculum to make the final year of the program a more practical experience that makes greater use of reallife/clinical and simulated learning experiences to develop the same skills, an approach that has already been adopted in some U.S. schools. This training could alternatively be made available through other accredited providers in different regions of the province. The latter possibility includes the added benefit of helping to address the dual problem of an aging bar in rural Canada as well as articling shortages in smaller communities. More fundamentally, increasing flexibility with respect to post-law school professional training appears to be a “win-win” by giving students more choice as well as opening up new opportunities for legal employers and educators.

Notwithstanding the advantages of Dean Sossin’s proposal, I cannot help but question whether it goes far enough.

After all, if articling remains an option, none of the underlying issues regarding the quality of the experience and its actual value to students, or the public that the articling requirement is partially intended to protect, is necessarily addressed. And

ULTRA VIRES if we ask the basic question of “if we started from scratch, how would we design legal education?” I suspect that articling would be left on the cutting floor as a relic more suited to a time when the profession and the world it inhabits were far less complex than they are now.

Perhaps we simply expect too much of legal education: today, the ultimate goal of law school + articling + the bar is to convey upon someone the privilege of “hanging out their shingle” and representing to the public that they are a lawyer who is potentially capable of taking their case. Given the vast idiosyncrasies of each practice area, I would suggest that we finally dispense with the illusion that “a lawyer is a lawyer” and realistically certify practitioners to work alone only in areas in which they possess some minimal combination of training and/or practical experience. If “the bar” were so tailored, then the expectations of law school and legal training could correspondingly be adjusted such that it would be possible to deliver “ready-made” law graduates directly into practice. Maybe then our welldeserved graduation day would feel that much more complete, and not merely a stepping stone on the way to something else.

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

NEWS

Matthew Scott fights for the right to walk

A U of T Law student is fighting a jaywalking ticket by launching a Charter challenge at the statute that created the offence.

Matthew Scott (3L)was stopped for jaywalking across a clear street in January 2010. A police officer wrote him a $50 ticket. Rather than meekly pay the fine, he’s challenging the validity of the section in the Highway Traffic Act that states “no pedestrian shall cross the roadway except within a portion so marked.”

His Charter claim is based on section 7 of the Charter, which mandates the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof. The statute violates the Charter because it is vague and overbroad, he said. He noted that pedestrians and police don’t know exactly what is legal and what is not, or how close a pedestrian must be to a crosswalk in order to be legally crossing. The law does not require crossings to be visible, within a reasonable distance or accessible at all, Scott said, noting that as a result, making legal crossings in some areas of the city can be very inconvenient for pedestrians. In the alternative, he is arguing that the law may be struck under the doctrine of vagueness.

Scott is also arguing that individuals have a common law right to jaywalk and that the legislature has not superseded this right with the statutory provision. The Supreme Court confirmed this right in 1975 in Taylor v Asody, he said. In that case, Justice De Grandpre, quoting a lower court judge, wrote, “The pedestrian has an undoubted right to cross a highway not at a regular crossing.”

BY TODD BRAYER (1L)

The court did, however, note that a pedestrian has a higher duty of care to avoid collisions than if he or she crossed at a marked crossing. Since then there has been no trial involving simple jaywalking, and Scott claims that the right has been upheld by a number of judgments involving pedestrian collisions.

Scott’s ticket came during a jaywalking blitz by the Toronto Police last winter. Alarmed at a rash of pedestrian deaths, particularly in the downtown area, the police issued hundreds of tickets.

The blitz was misguided, said Scott. “A lot of the deaths were caused by drivers running red lights, not jaywalkers.” Many of the dead were in fact crossing the street at marked crossings, he said.

Collisions in Toronto go up during winter months because it gets darker earlier and worse weather saps pedestrian patience. Wet and snowy conditions also lengthen the time it takes to fully brake.

According to a Toronto Police spokesman, crossing an intersection when the timer is counting down, even if you can reach the other side in time, is jaywalking and individuals have been ticketed in the past for doing so. He also said that the City of Toronto has its own traffic laws, which call for fines for jaywalkers who are impeding traffic. But these laws are intended to ensure somebody does not walk across Yonge Street during rush hour. Crossing an empty residential street would not be illegal under this law unless in doing so one is blocking a car.

Scott’s next appearance is at the Ontario Provincial Court in March.

News in brief

Moran Earns Second Term as Dean

Dean Mayo Moran was re-appointed to a second five-year term as Dean of the Faculty of Law. A search committee comprised of current students, faculty and other stakeholders in the Faculty of Law was formed over the summer and ultimately supported the decision to give Dean Moran a second term. Dean Moran’s second term begins July 1, 2011 and runs until June 30, 2016.

Faculty of Law External Review Published

As part of its review process, the U of T Faculty of Law released an external review produced by three prominent law school Deans.

The reviewers were Dean Timothy Endicott of Oxford, Dean Mary Anne Bobinski of UBC, and Dean Robert Rasmussen of the University of Southern California. Their report, while generally positive, offers specific criticisms regarding the physical facilities of the law school, stating that “the disparity between the resource and the essential need has reached a point where it is no hyperbole to invoke the word ‘crisis’.”

Ogilvy Renault Merges With International Firm Norton Rose

Just days after the McMillan-Lang Michener merger sent shockwaves through the legal community, Ogilvy Renault announced that it would be merging with British international giant Norton Rose. Effective June 1, 2011, Ogilvy Renault’s Canadian offices will reportedly operate under the name Norton Rose OR LLP. With the addition of Ogilvy Renault, Norton Rose is set to become one of the top 10 largest firms in the world.

7

LPPE - from page 6

Matthew G. Scott stands at the crossroads of justice

tered something about her lack of decorum and hustled away, scrambling to make sense of this seemingly random occurrence.

Was it random, though? Seated at a table, I carefully examined and re-examined every angle of my encounter with the young woman. Even as the scholarly event began, all I could think of was the terrified look in her eyes as she shrunk away from my omnipotent form. Could she really have bumped into me by chance, or did she have an ulterior motive? What did it all mean? And then, amidst the psychological chaos, a great epiphany struck and nearly knocked me to the ground: she was madly in love with me. Yes, this was the only plausible explanation. What else could explain this absurd string of events?

I pulled the set of binoculars from my bag and subtly looked around the room in an attempt to locate the seeker of my affections. It was not long before I found her. I must say, she was stunning.

I looked at her this way for some time before one of her neighbours noticed what I was doing and drew her attention to it. She blushed, crimson red.

My heart nearly stopped. I continued to gaze at her through the binoculars for another twenty minutes or so. I felt a warmth that had been absent in my life for some time.

Suddenly, without warning, she gathered her things and rushed out of the room. I was taken aback. I put the binoculars down and settled into deep meditation, trying to understand her latest ploy. That she was obsessed with me was a given, but how was I to react to this? When the answer dawned on me I went ghastly pale. Realizing that I was vastly superior to her, and to all other be-

ings, she saw we could never be together. My beloved would renounce her love for me the only way she knew how; she would take her life. I jumped up from the table and dashed from the room in hot pursuit. What if I were too late?

What if she had leaped in front of a speeding motor vehicle and been sprayed all over the road, a martyr of passion? As I threw open the conference centre doors I swore to myself that wherever she had died, I would die too. That was the honourable thing to do. I ran up and down the street, calling her name, but she was nowhere to be found. After several minutes of this I felt a chill, and so I headed back inside so that I would not catch cold.

I sat on a bench and wept. Again, my quest for love had been thwarted. Again, I was alone. I repeated to myself that it was better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all, while breathing into a brown paper bag. The colour slowly returned to my face. After remaining there for some time, I managed to clean myself up and return to the LPPE event. It was a full day, and I learned many new things about the legal profession. Indeed, that week I learned the most important lesson of all. This lesson was not legal in nature, however. I learned that the sun lies to us.

Its fatuous beams do not brighten our world; rather, its light makes the world darker. We are not served any better by seeing the wave that drowns us; we simply exist in terror. Also, the chocolate chip cookies served at break time were delicious.

All in all, the LPPE Intensive Week was a great success.

FEATURES

OCIs, OCIs and OCIs...

Looking for the perfect winter getaway?

If you’re planning on staying in Toronto during winter break, it’s not too late to stop yourself from wasting your life. When you’re older and burdened with annoying children, a spouse that could star in a YouTube video called Aging Fail, and a job that has made you pale and boring to the outside world, how much money would you give for a few weeks of being in the prime of your life, with no responsibilities, doing whatever you wanted? Don’t let your pathetic financial situation stop you from going wild. Your future self won’t mind being a bit poorer for it.

Imagine you’re 45, stressed, and much saggier than now. Are you imagining? Imagine deeper. Look away from the paper and into the mirror of 2030. Remember when you weren’t so bald or when your breasts were sexy and elastic? How’s your divorce going?

What’s that? Your kids don’t share your interests and aren’t mini-yous, but instead are typical 13-year-olds with all the uninteresting things typical 13-year-olds have to share with the world, only you have to hang around them all the time?

AND BOOM – you’re 25 and free. As Sergeant Martin Riggs once said while playing William Wallace, what will you do with that freedom?

Will you take an all-inclusive vacation?

NO! You’ve taken one of these the last 6 years in a row over the kids’ winter break in an effort to rekindle the romance with Aging Fail and escape life.

You can’t go anywhere else because you need a kid-friendly vacation and you need to be 100% sure that your brief respite from your stressful job will be relaxing. For the last 6 years in a row, the most exciting part of your trip has been discovering whether the buffet selection has changed. Earlier this year when you returned from your 6th resort vacation in 6 years, you discovered that your co-worker Nancy had stayed at the same resort as you the year before.

As she regaled you with her stories of the buffet, beach, weather, and water, you were crushed by the realization that pathetic Nancy’s unbelievably boring vacation stories were no better than yours. Nancy!

However, I’ve been asked to give tips on taking a cheap vacation, so if you’ve already given up on life or have accepted a bland relationship, the best website for booking an all-inclusive vacation is tripcentral.ca. Follow these steps to find a great layout of what’s available to you over winter break: 1) Go to tripcentral.ca 2) Click on “Compare All Destinations…”

3) Select you duration, meal plan, and star preferences at the top 4) Click on the month you want to leave (the months are in the column headers) 5) Click on the week you want to leave (again, in the column headers) 6) Using the list of the cheapest trip available to each country on each day, pick a country to see the specific resort options available to you While you’ll be traveling at one of the most expen-

BY JARED SPINDEL (3L)

sive times of the year, a sample of deals available as of Nov. 17th are (including all taxes): Be Live Villa Cayo Coco (Cuba) - Dec 24th 1) to Dec 31st, all-inclusive, 3 stars, $832 per person 2) Rooms on the Beach (Jamaica) – Dec 31st to Jan 7th, only breakfast, 3 stars, $687 per person 3) Celuisma Tropical Playa Dorada (Dominican) – Jan 1st – Jan 8th, all-inclusive, 3 stars, $697 per person Other websites you can check out include itravel2000.com, selloffvacations.com, searstravel.com, and transatholidays.com. You can also do a Google search and find more.

As a somewhat out of place side note, if you’re not going somewhere fun this break because you’ve got to attend a partner’s family holiday celebrations, this is a good time to put your foot down. Either the two of you are going to last, in which case this holiday season will blend in and be indistinguishable from the tens of

Cayo Coco offers a wonderful winter getaway

others you’ll spend together, or you won’t last – and this holiday season will be, depending on your state of mind, a depressing reminder of “the good times” or a source of anger for having wasted your life because of your cold hearted ex.

Due to recently learning that “cover story” was “obviously sarcastic,” the next section of this article – tips for getting away cheaply - is in point form.

• Consider flying from Buffalo. Megabus.com offers bus rides from Bay and Dundas to within a few metres of the departures area of the airport in Buffalo that range in price from $1 to $20 each way.

• Pick courses that will allow you to leave before the usual holiday period. This semester, my last exam is on Dec. 7th. As a reward, I get an extra two weeks of vacation, a very cheap flight, and I’m forced to get my papers done much earlier than the usual minute before the absolute deadline.

• Stay in hostels. You’re not too old. Hostelworld.com • Check out skyscanner.net or cheapflights.ca for destination ideas. Skyscanner.net allows you to search for flights without entering a destination, and the results will show the price to each country for the

dates you selected (note that the network of flights it searches from Canada is good, not great – this site is fantastic if you’re ever in Europe). Cheapflights.ca allows you to enter a continent or area of the world such as the Caribbean as your destination, and shows you all the results within that area.

• Check out rideshare on craigslist.org. Travel for your share of the cost of gas. Be sure to meet with the person in advance of your trip so you don’t get raped, or god forbid, have 2000 km of boring conversation.

• Check out wikitravel.org for a decent overview of potential destinations around the world.

Here are a few specific trip ideas for winter break that will be cheap and exciting: • Go to Cuba (Westjet offers roundtrip including taxes: 12/22-12/29 to Cayo Coco, $426; 12/29-1/8 to Cayo Coco, $335; 12/31-1/7 to Santa Clara, $446).

Once there, hitchhike around the less visited western part of Cuba. Hitchhiking in Cuba isn’t for homeless teens and ex-cons like in Canada. In Cuba there is an organized network of hitchhiking – there are designated waiting stations and police actually stop cars to fill any spare room with hitchhikers. Every city in Cuba has plenty of casas pensiones, which are extra rooms in people’s houses that are rented out nightly for $10-$20 (per room, not per person). Almost all of them also offer gigantic and delicious plates of fruit for breakfast for only $4 more (and a less delicious dinner for $6). Enjoy the land of beautiful weather, cigars, rum, beaches, music, salsa, and more! Create your own experience.

•Go to New Orleans for New Year’s Eve (12/29 - 1/5, $314 roundtrip from Toronto including taxes via Delta). The weather won’t be great (average January high of 16), but you’ll be too f—ked up to care. At least your nipples will be in top shape when you go for beads. Guys, remember that it’s cold out when swinging for beads.

Rumour has it that there’s a place in New Orleans called Bourbon Street where some people have had a good time. Enjoy cheap drinks, drinking on the street, no closing time, and much more. Frenchman Street is also pretty sweet. The Sugar Bowl (major college football game) is in New Orleans on January 4th, meaning thousands of drunken sorority girls and frat boys from the two universities playing in the game will be partying with you on New Year’s Eve. Pick one of the hick schools to root for, buy a jersey, and blend in.

It’s the unknown and unexpected that make for the most memorable and exciting experiences. Put yourself in a position to encounter as much unknown and unexpected as possible. Enjoy.

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

FEATURES

What makes a good mentor?

9

A conversation with Professor Lorraine Weinrib

INTERVIEW CONDUCTED BY BRAUNA DOIDGE (3L) AND AARON RANKIN (2L)

The Peer Mentorship Program (PMP) sat down with Prof. Lorraine Weinrib (LW) to hear her thoughts on mentorship and the practice of public law. Prior to teaching at the Faculty of Law, Prof. Weinrib worked at the Crown Law Office - Civil, Ministry of the Attorney General (Ontario), where she held the position of Deputy Director of Constitutional Law and Policy.

This transcript has been edited for the sake of concision.

thought was as close as possible [to the case] and I came up. And he said, “So you found it?” And I said, “Well, I’m not sure; it doesn’t seem to have the proposition of law that you mentioned.” He looked at me like nobody had ever said anything so crazy. He said, “Read the case, did you?” And I said, “Yes, I read the case.” He said, “What’s your name?” And that was it.

After that, we were inseparable. I became his junior, I went to every Supreme Court of Canada case he did, I was involved in the negotiations and the meetings on the Charter, and he was a wonderful mentor in every way. And that [this relationship] just came from reading the case, because he didn’t use students before that.

PMP: What do you think makes a good mentorship relationship?

Mentorship played a key role in Professor Weinrib’s career

PMP: How were you mentored in your career?

LW: The first major turn was how I ended up becoming a government lawyer. I articled with the Ontario government, and I was articled to somebody who was on the criminal side, but who was making what was then an unprecedented move to the civil side at the Ministry of the Attorney-General (MAG). It was an odd kind of mentoring because after a long, very illustrious career as a criminal appellate lawyer, my principal was now doing administrative law cases and he hadn’t been educated in the most recent developments in administrative law. I was writing the factums and preparing him for the arguments in cases. He could present what we had prepared, but he couldn’t answer questions. But he was such a good courtroom lawyer that he could get away with this. If there was a question, I would be madly writing down the answer or whispering it to him as this kind of ventriloquist. I had never intended to be a litigation lawyer, but one of the things I realized from the confidence he had in me and from this pattern that we had developed … was that I was quick enough on my feet that I could actually be a litigator. That was a big step. Later, I was the first woman hired by the Ontario government as a litigator.

How did I then become a constitutional lawyer? At the MAG, there was a very senior lawyer there who had done constitutional law and administrative law most of his career. He was kind of an austere person, and students tended to avoid him because he was known for mostly just sending students down to the library to get cases, but his directions [to the cases] were comically wrong. The joke around the office was that he’d give you one or more of the name of the case, the year and what it was about, and whatever he gave you was probably a little bit wrong. Anyway, he nabbed me one day, so I went down to the library and I found what I

LW: Well, sometimes it’s accidental. You, as the mentoree, don’t even know what skills or substantive knowledge or institutional expertise that you need, but you, by accident, have contact with somebody who takes an interest in you. I think that for the mentoree what’s really important is that the mentorship takes you to the next stage. It helps you think about what you know in a different way, and opens up new ways of learning. A good mentor is someone who either gives you an environment in which you can grow and ask questions, and be encouraged to think through an idea that’s fragmentary in your mind, or try to figure out a strategy to figure out what’s difficult in a particular idea - what’s vexing you. Sometimes a mentoring relationship can come in a very odd way. I had a number of wonderful conversations with Pierre Trudeau after he retired, and those came up completely accidentally, but I consider those conversations to have been a mentoring relationship. So what is good mentorship? Like a lot of things in life, you know it when you experience it. You can actually build on the expertise of other people. You can never have as much experience as the other people out there, but if people are generous in sharing their expertise and guiding you, then you can really benefit from it.

comes up, because you don’t know how it might come up. It’s very important to build your reading and writing skills, to publish, to take the array of courses offered in the area, to see what the live cases and issues are – to be conversant in all of these things. It’s as if you’re constantly preparing for an interview that you haven’t been offered yet. But be realistic. Some people have to go and do something that may not be their first choice for a while to pay back their loans, but you can use that as an opportunity to build skills. I see that governments are hiring people from private practice, so building good skills in litigation or some other area while in private practice can be a stepping stone to a government job, if that’s what you continue to be interested in doing. A lot of the firms support pro bono work, which can give you a balance of doing what it is that earns money for the firm and other work that you think is really meaningful. There are some people who really thrive on that kind of variety and might not be as happy if they were in government and had to do the government side of the work. You have to be realistic about your temperament.

PMP: Do you see law professors as having a responsibility to mentor students?

LW: I consider the relationship with students to be a teaching relationship but also, where it’s appropriate, to be a mentoring relationship. A lot of students want to have careers in public law, and my courses are designed to give people a real edge on what I understand is necessary to be a very talented and innovative public lawyer today. I’m not teaching what I was taught in law school. What was taught to me in federalism didn’t really help me litigate federalism cases. When I returned to the law school to teach, I changed the basic [Constitutional law] curriculum for first-year. So, I do consider what I’m doing as a kind of mentoring, because I try to combine the substantive law with teaching about the institutions, the strategies, and the modes of thinking in public law.

PMP: What advice do you give to aspiring Constitutional lawyers?

LW: Although the job market may look dismal, I always say, you only need one job – at a time. You have to think of constantly being ready for that job when it

As Professor Weinrib discovered, mentorship can blossom when you least expect it

Remember, very often, there’s nobody who can give you career advice, because nobody can really imagine what your position is. But [the experiences I described] in the stories that I told you gave me so much confidence in myself because people whose ability and talents and good sense and really fine lawyering I respected had sort of demonstrated how you make these decisions, and how you become the lawyer you want to become. It’s such a complicated profession. In particular, there are often problems for women. As I mentioned, I was the first woman lawyer hired in Ontario to litigation and I had kids, so it was difficult to do all of that. There was nobody I could ask about that.

But because I had good mentors on other things, I could kind of mentor myself.

10

FEATURES

2010 SURVEY OF TORONTO LAW FIRM RECRUITING

The 2010 Ultra Vires Review of Law Firm Recruitment was conducted using an anonymous online survey distributed to second-year students at the law school. 123 responses were received, representing roughly two-thirds of the students who participated in the Toronto OCI process. Respondents were asked to answer a number of personal questions and to provide specific comments on their interactions with the participating firms. Respondents were also asked to rate each firm from 1 – 10 at the various stages throughout the overall process. Firm rankings were then calculated based on a formula of: 20 percent OCI, 20 percent in-firm, 10 percent events, 10 percent respect and 40 percent overall.

Male Female Visible Minority Not Visible Minority 23 and Under 24 to 26 27 and over 2010 Entire Sample 2009 Entire Sample 2008 Entire Sample 2007 Entire Sample

Mean # of Applications 22.3 21.6 22.9 21.8 22.8 21.2 22.8 22.0 23.8 20.7 20.4

The final results have been tallied and U of T has come out on top of the 7th Annual Ultra Vires Review of Toronto Law Firm Recruitment. For the second year in a row, U of T finished first among all law schools in terms of overall Toronto firm hiring numbers. According to information from the CDO, 187 students participated in the Toronto OCIs (receiving interviews). According to data volunteered by firms and compiled

by Ultra Vires, at least 101 students from U of T were hired for 2L summer positions after November interview week.

The 101 student hire mark reached by U of T is a new record, narrowly edging last year’s 100 hire total. Of the 123 students who participated in the Ultra Vires survey, 24.8 percent of respondents did not receive a job offer, 31.3 percent received one offer, 20 percent received two offers, 18 percent received three offers and only 4.3 percent received four or more offers. U of T beat out Osgoode Hall Law School, our northern rival, who had 89 students hired. Western (52), Windsor (43), Queen’s (40) and Ottawa (40) rounded out the top six.

Despite strong raw numbers, the UV survey paints an interesting picture, showing that the U of T class of 2012 produced a very average result compared with previous classes. After reaching a high-water mark with offers for 85 percent of survey respondents in 2007 and a record low with only 69.1 percent of respondents in 2009 receiving one or more offers, a stronger 75.2 percent of this year’s respondents received one or more offers. Perhaps this is suggestive

The statistical analysis of the survey results should be read critically. First, where statistics are reported for sub-samples (e.g. individual firm ratings) they are based on relatively low sample size.

Second, no attempt was made to correct for statistical errors such as selection bias or autocorrelation.

Third, data collection results and processes have varied from year to year (for example, more firms were contacted in 2010 and 2009 than previously). Finally, for the firm ratings, there was no correction for potential biases created by other factors such as the number of students interviewed at each firm, the number of students hired, or whether or not the respondent received an offer from a firm.

OCIs, Callbacks, Offers: The Big Picture

Mean # of OCIs 10.6 9.2 9.7 10.2 11.1 9.4 9.4 9.9 10.9 11.8 12.1

ULTRA VIRES

Mean # of Total In-firms 5.6 4.5 4.0 5.5 5.2 5.2 5.0 5.1 5.2 6.0 5.8

Mean # of Offers 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.9 1.5 -

% Receiving 1+ Offer 73.8 76.9 70.8 77.6 67.5 81.0 78.6 75.2 69.1 76.3 84.8

of the improvThe Effect of Grades ing outlook for GPA Mean # of OCIs Mean # of In-firms Mean # of Offers % Receiving 1+ Offer the Canadian > 3.60 13.9 7.8 1.8 90.5 and global econ3.45 3.60 10.9 5.6 1.9 93.3 omy, as it seems 3.30 3.45 11.5 4.9 1.5 66.7 to indicate law 7.6 4.0 1.2 72.8 firms’ confi- 3.15 - 3.30 3.00 - 3.15 3.6 2.8 0.9 62.5 dence that we Last year, an alarming 22 percent offer Considering the fact that more firms will not experience a double-dip recesparticipated in OCIs this year than in rate gap existed between non-visible mision. previous years, the fewer number of ap- norities and visible minorities. This year, A closer inspection of the results replications, OCIs and in-firms may reflect that gap has shrunk to only 7 percent. veals that the 3Ls who described the expectations of increased success in the This is not a complete reversal of recent class of 2012 as partiers may have been process and/or a targeted effort on spe- trends; nor is it on par with 2007, when proven right. The average respondent to cific firms earlier on in the process visible minorities outperformed non-visthe survey submitted 22 applications – (given the constraints of a 3-day second- ible minorities with offer rates of 93.1 the fewest applications over the past few percent compared to 82.7 percent. Howround interview process). years. Interestingly, the number of OCIs ever, this certainly represents a drastic for which students were selected was Ethnicity Results are Improving improvement over the paltry 52.8 persmaller than it was in the past two years, cent of visible minorities receiving offers though students received close to the and Women Continue to Domiin 2009 (compared with 75 percent for same number of in-firm interviews. nate!

The Effect of Everything Else

# of ECs in 1st Year 6+ 3-5 0-2

Extracurriculars Mean # of OCIs Mean # of In-firms Mean # of Offers % Receiving 1+ Offer 10.8 7.1 1.8 86.7% 9.9 5.1 1.4 77.6% 9.1 4.0 1.4 60.6%

Course Selection 2L Class Type Mean # of OCIs Mean # of In-firms Mean # of Offers % Receiving 1+ Offer Heavy focus on business 14.0 5.5 1.6 80.8% Mixed between business and other 10.6 6.1 1.6 78.6% Few, if any, business classes 4.3 2.3 0.9 57.1% Job Research Assistant Other Law-Related Job At a firm (big or boutique) Non-Law job Not Working

1L Summer Jobs Mean # of OCIs Mean # of In-firms Mean # of Offers % Receiving 1+ Offer 10.7 5.9 1.6 80.0 10.4 5.6 1.6 84.9 14.9 7.2 1.7 71.4 13.6 2.6 1.1 58.8 4.8 1.4 0.5 36.4

FEATURES

Baker & McKenzie

5

+1

4

-2

1

0

0

7

3

3

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

+1

0

3

-

0

1

-

14

-6

Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg*

14

-3

Chaitons Davis

Department of Justice

2 5

-

0

Dimock Stratton**

2

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin

17

Fogler, Rubinoff

5

+1

4

0

Epstein Cole

Filion Wakely Throup Angeletti Fraser Milner Casgrain* Gardiner Roberts Gilbert’s

Lang Michener

0 0

+1 -

0 3 2 2 4 4 4 0

0 1 3 1 1 3 3 4 2

1 1 2 0 0 0 4 2 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0

1 0 0 4 1 0 1 1 2 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0

0 1 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0

0

2

0

0

0

1

+1

3

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5 3

-3 -

10

-2

3

-1

6

0

4

-

25 2 2

+2 -

3

0

Stikeman Elliott**

22

-1

Torys

20

0

1 1 4 7 4

2010 Totals

444

2008 Totals

406

2006 Totals

1

0

0

0

2007 Totals

0

2

3

2009 Totals

0

1

0

0

Wildeboer Dellelce

0

2

3

WeirFoulds

0

0

0

Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein

Torkin Manes**

0

0

2

+1

Solmon Rothbart Goodman

1

0

0

0

14

Smart & Biggar

1

3

2

Ogilvy Renault

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom

0

0

0

2

0

Sherrard Kuzz

1

2

4

12

Shearman & Sterling

0

0

0

3

Miller Thomson

Ridout & Maybee

0

0

2

-2

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt

2

0

0

+2

25

Ministry of the Attorney General – Crown Law Office – Criminal

1

0

0

McCarthy Tétrault

Ministry of the Attorney General – Crown Law Office – Civil

1

1

0

0

0

2

Minden Gross

4

2

0

1

6

1

Macleod Dixon McMillan

0

0

0

0

1

0

+1

15

Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark

1

3

0

2

0

0

6

Legal Aid Ontario

Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin

0

0

0

2

3

1

0

0

+2

Koskie Minsky

2

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

17

Keel Cottrelle

1

0

3

2

3

0

0

0

Heenan Blaikie

Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie

1

3

3

1

0

0

0

0

+1

3

6

7

0

2

0

3

0

16

Hicks Block Adams

1

1

3

0

0

1

0

15

2

9

0

0

0

3

3

0

0

1

0

+1

13

1

1

-1

2

Goodmans*

Gowling Lafleur Henderson

3

7

Cassels Brock & Blackwell

Other

0

21

Cancer Care Ontario

Dalhousie

1

Borden Ladner Gervais

Brauti, Thorning Zibarras

Windsor

2

35 +11 17 -3

McGill

2

Blake, Cassels & Graydon* Blaney McMurtry

Ottawa

1

16

Bereskin & Parr

* The hiring numbers for these firms include returning first-year summer students.

1

Bennett Jones

-1

Queen's

0

Western

8

Toronto

Aird & Berlis*

Change

Firm

Osgoode

Job Distribution By School And Firm Total

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

427 446 407

-

0 0

-2

+1

1 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 1 2 3 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 3 2 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 4 6 0 1 1 1 1 2 0

0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

3

10 2

8

2

0 0 1

0

0

3

1

0

2 1

1 0 2 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 2

2 1 4 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 0

0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

1 0 4 0 1 6 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0

0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0

104 99 55 43 44 25 44 15 15 100 98 42 49 30 19 27 19 24 85 92 42 49 34 23 37 18 26 88 93 43 48 42 19 37 32 33 91 86 47 42 35 26 34 25 23

11

Firms with no data beside their names were either unable or unwilling to release their hiring data to us.

** Stikeman Elliott, Torkin Manes and Dimock Stratton provided their hiring data to UV after the print version went to press. Their hiring numbers are included in the job distribution chart in the online edition, but the survey analysis has not been updated to reflect this information.

non-visible minorities), and a slight improvement over the 67.9 percent of visible minorities who received offers in 2008 (compared with 80.3 percent of non-visible minorities).

Gender discrimination has been a long-term hot issue on Bay Street. Fortunately, any remnants of a gender gap appeared to have been further reduced in this year’s survey results. Males and females received offers with nearly identical frequency, a welcome change given that this aspect has historically fluctuated wildly. Males were 22 percent less likely to get an offer in 2008, evidencing a trend of female dominance over OCIs which has continued this year, with a 77 percent likelihood the average female respondent received one or more offers, compared to a 74 percent likelihood for men.

The breakdown by age appears to be generally consistent with past results. Much like last year, those aged 24 – 26 performed the best, while those aged 23 or under performed the poorest. This is a fascinating trend, as one could assume that those who start law school younger are likely to be more driven towards law or more naturally gifted than those who took time off, worked in other professions or pursued other degrees.

The Effect of Grades

GPA has been an accurate predictive indicator of performance in Toronto recruiting in the past. Surprisingly, this year’s results seem to question that logic in the highest percentiles: perhaps personality and extracurriculars have surpassed a previous reliance on grades. This year, like last year, the value of a B+ is significant. Students in the 3.15 – 3.30 range (more B+s than Bs) beat those in the 3.00 – 3.15 range (more Bs than B+s) by being more likely to receive one or more offers by a factor of 1.3 compared with last year’s factor of 2.2. A further change with this year’s results: those with GPAs above 3.60 obtained a higher mean number of OCIs and in-firms, but a lower mean number of offers, than those with GPAs between 3.45 and 3.60. However, this reversal could have resulted from top students strongly favouring one firm from their in-firms, and having generally more confidence about their chances of receiving an offer (allowing them to neglect other firms to a greater extent). Additionally, for the second year in a row, the 3.30 – 3.45 GPA range has outperformed the 3.45 – 3.60 range in terms of mean number of OCIs, although unlike last year this doesn’t hold for the mean number of in-firms. Again, this could be a function of students in the lower range applying more broadly because of less certainty about their chances compared with students with better grades.

Nevertheless, the moral of the story remains: 1Ls get at least a B+ average!

The Effect of Everything Else

1Ls who have managed to make it this far into the article would be well-advised to clip this section (and the accompanying chart) out, crumple it into

12

a ball and throw it out without reading it.

We might as well call this section “Everything you expect is true”! Unlike last year where grades seemed to matter a lot and first year summer jobs were largely irrelevant, this year, it appears that having a law-related job is your ticket to scoring an offer in OCIs. The survey results indicate that those who did not work at all during the summer after 1L were the least likely to receive one or more offers (at only 36.4 percent). They had significantly lower chances of even getting an OCI compared with people who worked at all, with a mean of only 4.8 OCIs compared with the next lowest category of 10.4 OCIs for people with law-related jobs.

Those with firm jobs (both big and small) were the most likely to get OCI’s, but interestingly, not the most likely to receive an offer, which may indicate the perils of accepting 1L jobs when your heart is set on big firms not accepting 1L students. For all intents and purposes, there was little difference in performance between any of the groups of jobs.

Moral of the story for 1Ls – any job can get you an OCI. Just try not to give into the temptation to sleep or backpack your way through the summer expecting it to serve you well. However, as 123 students participated in OCIs (100 percent participation in any Ultra Vires Survey would really be big news), it may also be worth repeating that it is quite likely that the “chill” students who didn’t do 6+ extracurriculars and work a law-related job in 1L are also the students least likely to respond to this survey – possibly skewing these results. Last year’s survey actually found the opposite results, in that students who did not work in the 1L summer performed the best.

Perhaps more relieving than the above considerations: there was virtually no difference between individuals who participated in a moderate number (3-5) of extra-curriculars and students who participated in only 0-2 extra-curriculars, as the mean number of offers for students in both groups was 1.4. Students who took on an extreme number of extra-curriculars (6+) fared only marginally better, receiving an average of 1.8 offers. However, the prevailing belief is that many of the students who took on more than 6 extra activities are keen/crazy anyways, so perhaps this was not the only factor boosting their stats.

Finally, in terms of the selection of upper-year courses, it appears as if loading up on or taking business courses improves your chances. Students who took many business courses received an average of 1.6 offers, compared to 0.9 offers for those who took few, if any business classes. However, those who balanced a mixed schedule fared better than those who loaded up on business classes, obtaining fewer OCIs but a higher average number of in-firms. Therefore the lesson here is clearly that students should attempt to create a balanced and well-

rounded course load.

FEATURES

A Note on NY Firms, Interviews & Split Summers

U of T Law has developed a tradition of sending students southwards each year, mostly to New York. This practice reached a peak a few years ago, when the Metro Toronto Convention Centre was swarmed with dozens of US firms courting Canadian candidates. It is rumored that for firms who do not have a tier 1 reputation for corporate law, recruiting Canadians for their corporate groups ensures they receive the brightest and most eager candidates, rather than the lackluster candidates from US schools who did not get receive offers from the tier 1 firms.

Although this was not the focus of the Ultra Vires survey, information provided by the CDO indicates that 51 students applied to the firms that participated in the New York OCIs and 32 of those students received interviews. However, these figures do not include students who applied directly to firms that do not participate in the U of T New York OCIs. Although post-recession New York recruiting in Toronto hit an all time low, it appears to be on the rise again. Firms who had dropped out of the U of T process in previous years solicited resumes, conducted OCIs and hosted dinners and fly back interviews. Five respondents reported plans to split their summer between a New York firm and a Toronto firm, with two respondents planning to split their experience at one firm between two of its offices, and another two respondents splitting their summer between two firms in different cities (not including New York). However, splitting still appears to be a rare occurrence in the post-recession environment, with 92.2% of respondents planning on spending a full summer at only one firm.

Firm Contractions and Expansion

After Blakes significantly reduced the size of their summer program last year, they bulked up their summer class size by 11 spots this year. Only Cassels Brock significantly reduced their hiring by cutting 6 spots, which seems particularly curious as Cassels increased their class size by 6 spots last year amid recession fears.

Other increases and decreases in summer class size were relatively modest, which allows 2Ls who secured jobs at these firms to breathe a sigh of relief, as it likely indicates stability. It also means the firms’ current articling and full-time hireback rates for the class of 2012 will probably remain roughly consistent with past standards.

Job Distribution By School

U of T clearly stood out from other law schools, earning 12 more jobs than any other school. The biggest declines

were experienced at Queen’s, which earned 13 fewer jobs than last year. Western appears to have established itself, as a solid third with 52 student hires (all but 4 of whom are headed to full-service firms). Windsor has leap into 4th place with 43 hires, a 12 job improvement from last year.

The vast majority of U of T hires are headed to full-service firms, with 83 students going to such firms. Osgoode Hall had 65 students hired by full-service firms, while Western had 48. Among fullservice firms, reporting Seven Sister firms (hiring data for Stikeman Elliott was unavailable at press time) demonstrated a marked preference for U of T students. The Seven Sisters hired 47 U of T students, a mark that is more than double that of Osgoode (23) or Western (19).

Blakes once again singled itself out as the largest hirer of U of T students, taking 17 2Ls out of the mix, making up almost half of its 35-person summer class.

The next biggest U of T contingent headed to Torys (which took 8 students).

Bennett Jones also favoured U of T students this year, hiring 7 students from Toronto (whereas just 1 from most other schools).

FULL SERVICE FIRM RANKINGS: Aird & Berlis (#28)

Very few U of T students went for an in-firm interview and consequently, a returning first-year summer student was the firm’s only hire from U of T. The general impression from the OCIs was positive in response to the friendly people. However, one respondent warned that it was “easy to be impressed at first; make sure you take a closer look!”

Baker & McKenzie (#27)

Baker & McKenzie significantly dropped in the standings this year, considering last year’s finish in the #3 spot.

The firm did not see very many candidates, but more than one respondent noted it was “nice” to receive an umbrella and cupcake at their OCI. Another student felt the firm was “unprofessional.” Unsurprisingly, the firm did not hire any U of T students.

Bennett Jones (#14)

Respondents had very mixed feelings about the OCI process at Bennett Jones, which dropped two spots from #12.

While some enjoyed the “formal” and “professional” approach in the interviews, others found the interviewers to be “unresponsive” or “disinterested.” Respondents agreed that the second round was intense and formal, though many commented on a “great” dinner experience and noted that the firm made it clear “once they like you.”

Blake, Cassels & Graydon (#6)

Losing ground from their #5 ranking

ULTRA VIRES

last year, Blakes appeared weak at the OCI stage. While some students felt prepared for their standard “tell me about your life” question and felt the interview went well, others found the interviewers “dull and not particularly friendly,” especially when compared to other firms that indicated interest in applicants more strongly. The in-firm experience was generally loved for its structure/use of ”hosts” and the breadth of partners and associates interviewees can meet, with generally positive event experiences as well. The firm was again given kudos for being respectful and not pressuring students in their decision-making process.

Blaney McMurtry (#5)

Blaney skyrocketed up the standings, finishing fifth compared to last year’s 22nd spot. The high ranking may be partially due to the smaller pool of U of T candidates that the firm saw. Respondents described the firm as being “friendly, open and honest,” though others felt it was missing the “wow” factor.

Borden Ladner Gervais (#18)

Students seemed generally unimpressed by their “awkward” and “boring” OCI experience with BLG, which fell closer to the bottom of the rankings this year. However, the firm improved on the in-firm experience, events and generally high level of respect for students in the process. As one student remarked, “as the biggest firm in Canada, you would expect a degree of hierarchy and rigidity.

They do not disappoint.” Perhaps their ranking was affected by the fact that they hired just 1 U of T student for their 21student class.

Cassels Brock & Blackwell (#24)

Dropping 14 spots to near the bottom of the list, Cassels was perceived variably.

Students liked the chocolate from the OCI and generally found it to be “very fun,” but found the “over-the-top” flattery too much, especially considering that for some it did not seem to correlate with getting a callback. Responses about respect and event experiences were similarly highly polarized. Two black spots mentioned in the responses were that the in-firm experience was “chaotic and poorly organized” and that the firm gives a “terrible workload.” Only 2 U of T students were among their 14 hires.

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg (#2)

Making its way from #8 to #2, Davies certainly dazzled this year. With 6 U of T students accepting offers, students enjoyed the firm’s “conversational” interviews and friendly people, although some students were put off by their “aggressive” and “pushy” style. However, one student speculated that Davies may have crossed a LSUC line or two. Another commented that attendance at the Wednesday breakfast reception is mandatory if you want an offer.

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

Davis (#25)

Students described the OCI experience with Davis as off-putting. One student mentioned the firm aggressively asked “why Davis” and another was disappointed that they specifically asked whether applicants would be okay with representing the “bad guys.” The in-firm experience was described as more relaxed, although “apparently not going to the reception is a complete deal-breaker because the offers are determined by a vote. You have to meet as many people are possible to muster up the necessary votes.”

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin (#7)

Fasken dropped six spots from its top rank last year, perhaps because of the mixed signals it sent to students. Students appreciated the casual atmosphere at the OCI and found the in-firm experience overwhelmingly positive, with strong organization and the opportunity to meet lots of people. The firm also managed to convey interest in the applicant without crossing any ethical lines. However, one student felt led on by the firm, after having many warm interactions and strong positive signals only to receive a standard rejection email instead of an offer. Another commented that “unless you tell

FEATURES

them they are your first choice, don’t count on a phone call.”

Fogler, Rubinoff (#26)

Finishing in the same spot as last year for full-service firms, respondents criticized Foglers for being unprepared and seemingly distracted during OCIs, albeit friendly enough. Further, not one comment was made under the “events” category, meaning it is possible U of T students did not even receive invites. In the future, Foglers would be advised to provide free food and a more engaging experience if it wants to move up in the rankings.

Fraser Milner Casgrain (#20)

With multiple comments (amid a small number of responses) about providing M&Ms, it seems respondents were more captivated by the loot than the firm, complaining of distracted and disinterested interviewers during OCIs. However, although the firm moved offices the morning of in-firms, respondents commented that the firm seemed quite well organized (amid the “mess”). Secondround interviewers were found to be positive and helpful, and the firm was very respectful.

Gardiner Roberts (#9)

This year, Gardiner Roberts moved into the top ten firms. Respondents found the OCI process to be so friendly that it was “lacking only the campfire and the guitar.” However, many respondents noted a “horrible” in-firm interview set up: it seems they attempted to have interviewees meet the entire student committee. Gardiner Roberts welcomed two U of T students into its class of four next summer.

Goodmans (#19)

Maintaining approximately the same ranking as last year, Goodmans received praise for being casual, friendly and as expected by the stereotype in OCIs. However, in-firm interviews were criticized for being “creepy” in their friendliness.

Responses also seemed to agree with the 2011 class that the reception was a “noisy” failure. Interestingly, the “overall” comments were overwhelmingly negative, citing “no transparency,” a “pompous” attitude and a general “fraternity” feel. We at UV sincerely hope these comments didn’t come from any of the 4 students who accepted!

Gowling Lafleur Henderson (#23)

13

Students described their OCI experience as “different,” explaining that the firm was quite aggressive and formal, although others “had fun.” The in-firm experience was described as very informal, but “poorly run,” although respondents liked the opportunity to meet more people at the cocktail reception and found the firm generally respectful.

Heenan Blaikie (#13)

It appears Heenan considerably upped the ante this year, as they jumped from number 24 in the rankings. The OCI experience generated mixed results, with some students liking the friendly and “high energy” character of the interviewers, while others felt the student coordinator came on too strong. While there was generally positive feedback in terms of in-firms and level of respect, students noted odd email etiquette, with some who complained about slow responses and another who “loved” getting their congrats email after choosing to work at another firm.

Lang Michener (#16)

Candidate comments seem to agree that Lang has a “comfortable” personality, albeit a bit “nerdy.” One student

8.1 7.9 7.3 7.9 7.7 6.8 7.3 7.6 8.9 6.9 7.7 6.5 7.6 5.8 7.7 6.9 7.7 6.3 7.6 6.3 7.1 7.0 6.4 7.6 5.0 6.4 6.3 8.5

32 23 40 27 12 45 34 37 7 10 9 33 35 38 25 20 9 45 35 27 32 23 34 37 29 9 11 11

9.5 8.6 8.5 8.7 8.3 9.1 8.9 7.9 6.0 7.0 8.0 7.2 7.7 6.8 7.1 6.7 7.2 6.9 7.4 6.8 5.6 7.1 5.8 9.0 6.5 3.0 5.3

13 16 10 16 3 20 12 14 4 3 10 12 15 4 7 3 12 11 5 11 5 9 10 3 2 1 4

9.3 9.0 8.7 8.0 8.0 8.6 8.1 7.2 9.0 8.0 9.3 7.3 8.3 8.0 6.0 10.0 8.2 6.4 7.7 6.8 4.8 7.6 5.3 9.0 6.0 3.0

13 12 6 15 3 20 12 10 2 3 4 3 9 4 6 1 6 9 3 9 5 5 11 1 1 3

8.1 8.6 8.7 7.7 8.8 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.8 8.4 8.0 7.4 7.3 8.0 7.5 7.9 6.3 7.5 7.1 6.9 6.5 7.7 6.4 6.9 5.8 6.1 8.0 6.3

19 19 24 22 8 33 22 25 5 5 4 23 26 25 13 15 7 25 20 16 21 13 21 22 12 7 4 7

8.1 8.5 8.1 7.9 7.8 7.6 7.5 7.7 7.5 8.0 7.2 7.0 7.2 7.3 6.9 7.5 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.0 6.4 5.1 6.3 7.4 6.1

# of Responses

Overall Scores

# of Responses

Scores

Respect

# of Responses

Scores

Events

# of Responses

Scores

Firm Torys LLP Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg LLP McMillan LLP Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Blaney McMurtry LLP Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP McCarthy Tétrault LLP Gardiner Roberts LLP Macleod Dixon LLP Torkin Manes LLP Ogilvy Renault LLP Heenan Blaikie LLP Bennett Jones LLP WeirFoulds LLP Lang Michener LLP Minden Gross LLP Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Goodmans LLP Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP Stikeman Elliott LLP Miller Thomson LLP Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP Davis LLP Fogler, Rubinoff LLP Baker & McKenzie LLP Aird & Berlis LLP

In-firm

# of Responses

Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Scores

OCI

20 19 24 24 8 33 24 26 6 5 5 22 26 25 14 14 7 27 21 16 23 14 21 22 14 6 5 7

Composite Score

Full Service Firm Rankings

84.7 84.6 81.5 80.4 79.7 78.7 78.6 76.6 76.5 76.2 75.0 73.9 72.9 72.6 72.1 71.9 71.2 69.5 69.4 67.9 67.9 65.5 64.9 64.7 63.4 63.4 62.4 61.2

* Certain firms did not have receptions, dinners or other events and/or an insufficient number of responses were received from candidates. For these firms, “events” was removed from the formula calculating the Composite Score. ** Results which appear to be ties and are not marked as such are as a result of rounding. *** We did not receive a sufficient number of responses for the following firms to include them in our Recruitment Review: Cancer Care Ontario, Chaitons, Sherrard Kuzz

commented that “the event was a bit awkward (red roses and dry ice?! It was like living in a Prince video).” In any event, with the McMillan merger, it won’t be around next year – let’s hope its new hires aren’t too put off by the surprise!

Macleod Dixon (#10)

To place tenth in its first year of OCIs, Macleod Dixon definitely did a few things right, although it failed to hire any students from U of T. OCIs were described as a little unorthodox and informal, with one student likening the experience to “being cornered by old relatives at a wedding.” However, the infirm experience, albeit quite formal, provided respondents with helpful information about experiences at the firm and respondents universally seemed to enjoy the dinner experience with five lawyers and five candidates. The firm still has a few kinks to iron out moving forward, like emailing students to let them know if they will be getting in touch on call day.

McCarthy Tetrault (#8)

FEATURES

the realities of students planning their schedules ahead of time.

Miller Thomson (#22)

With OCIs panned as “awkward” almost across the board, students consistently remarked on Miller Thomson’s “weird vibe.” It is also important to note that they allowed only one in-firm interview – a rarity in the typical full-service firm, which put significantly more pressure on the cocktail reception. Miller Thomson’s performance is best described by their own, as described by a respondent: “Someone at the reception told me that they feel like throwing themselves out of a window at work sometimes in a very serious way. It was unnerving.” Interestingly, none of Miller Thomson’s hires came from U of T or Osgoode.

Minden Gross (#17)

Minden Gross had mixed results all around, from an “awkward” OCI process to “excellent” in-firms. A big

The OCI received mixed reviews, with one respondent even finding the interviews to be “combative, interrogative, and unpleasant.” The consensus on the in-firm experience was that although it started formally, it was really a chance to meet different people at the firm. This relaxed atmosphere continued into the events, where “there was no sales pitch.”

The firm seemed generally respectful, but one student said friends had been told to expect offers, but didn’t receive them; another respondent criticized the firm for not allowing split summers.

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (#4)

Maintaining its spot from last year, Osler had positive comments across the board about the OCI. Nearly everyone was positive about the in-firm experience, citing “friendly” people and strong matching of interests with hosts and interviewers. However, some students didn’t appreciate that the firm invited everyone to dinners, making them “noisy, unstructured affairs,” although others

McMillan (#3)

17 Minden Gross LLP 18 Borden Ladner Gervais LLP 19 Goodmans LLP 20 Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP 21 Stikeman Elliott LLP 22 Miller Thomson LLP 23 Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP 24 Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 25 Davis LLP 26 Fogler, Rubinoff LLP 27 Baker & McKenzie LLP 28 Aird & Berlis LLP

Moving up to the top 3, McMillan continued to impress. Students found the OCI to be more “traditional.” Interviewers were “respectful”; one respondent mentioned personalized responses to thank-you notes. The infirm experience continued with the more formal tone of the OCI and one respondent noted they asked the most “prying questions” about readiness for Bay Street. Events and respect received mixed, but generally positive reviews.

One student complained about not having a clear indication of whether they would receive a callback, while another found the firm exemplary in terms of following the LSUC guidelines. One student suggested that in the future, the firm should rethink their “in-firm scheduling policy of having interviews start on the half-hour,” as it is risky considering

stumbling block for Minden Gross seemed to be respect, where the small number of respondents criticized the firm for being “misleading” with their intentions as well as “adversarial” and borderline rude in the OCI.

Ogilvy Renault (#12)

Dropping further from its top 10 ranking for the last two years, Ogilvy hired 3 of its 14 summer students from U of T.

71.2 69.5 69.4 67.9 67.9 65.5 64.9 64.7 63.4 63.4 62.4 61.2

66.8 (23) 73.4 (13) 67.7 (20) 70.9 (16) 78.3 (5) 50.6 (27) 69.0 (18) 76.7 (10) 69.0 (17) 62.6 (26) 79.6 (3) 63.5 (25)

2008 Score (Rank)

2009 Score (Rank)

2010 Score

McCarthys improved in the rankings Full-Service Firm Historical Rankings from last year, with students finding the OCI to be serious, formal, “classic” and professional. Respondents seemed generally impressed with the in-firm experience, with introductions to “over 25 lawyers,” strong organization, and matching of personality types. They Firm also felt they received “honest” opin1 Torys LLP 84.7 79.7 (2) 82.5 (1) ions. However, given last year’s sexual 2 Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg LLP 84.6 76.9 (8) 68.5 (18) discrimination lawsuit against Mc3 McMillan LLP 81.5 77.0 (7) 62.2 (24) Carthy’s, one student felt “their efforts 4 Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP 80.4 78.3 (4) 76.8 (5) to convince me that the firm was a 5 Blaney McMurtry LLP 79.7 66.9 (22) 69.9 (16) friendly place to work for women 6 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP 78.7 77.5 (6) 75.5 (8) sometimes became overtly and aggres- 7 Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP 78.6 81.1 (1) 66.0 (22) sively manipulative” with respect to 8 McCarthy Tétrault LLP 76.6 73.0 (15) 76.8 (5) having many pregnant female inter- 9 Gardiner Roberts LLP 76.5 73.4 (14) 60.7 (26) 76.2 viewers. Another response complained 10 Macleod Dixon LLP 75.0 68.6 (19) 51.5 (29) about not receiving an invite to any 11 Torkin Manes LLP 73.9 76.8 (9) 72.7 (11) events (although two others mentioned 12 Ogilvy Renault LLP 13 Heenan Blaikie LLP 72.9 65.9 (24) 66.3 (21) a lunch and a dinner). Let this be a les14 Bennett Jones LLP 72.6 73.7 (12) 71.2 (14) son to 1Ls – if you aren’t happy about 15 WeirFoulds LLP 72.1 67.6 (21) 71.9 (12) not getting an invite, ask about a lunch! 16 Lang Michener LLP 71.9 76.6 (11) 76.6 (7) 79.7 (2) 69.7 (17) 74.5 (9) 64.5 (23) 68.0 (19) 70.1 (15) 51.6 (28) 73.0 (10) 67.2 (20) 57.9 (27) 71.7 (13) 77.7 (4)

2007 Score (Rank)

14

74.2 (9) 74.1 (10) 74.7 (8) 76.1 (6) 57.6 (25) 73.8 (13) 76.9 (5) 67.3 (17) 66.6 (19) 83.4 (1) 75.3 (7) 64.9 (22) 66.0 (18) 65.7 (20) 80.1 (2) 73.9 (12) 73.0 (11) 72.2 (14) 63.4 (23) 68.7 (16) 77.2 (4) 77.7 (3) 69.1 (15) 64.9 (21) 48.7 (26)

clearly thrived in this environment. The biggest criticism involved respect and how the firm drops candidates, as respondents felt that the firm were “time wasters” bringing people back whom they had no intention of hiring. Yet, others found the fact that they call you to let you know they won’t be offering positions to be very respectful.

ULTRA VIRES

Stikeman Elliott (#21)

Startlingly dropping in ranking from 5 down to 21 this year, Stikeman really appears to have made a poor impression on U of T students. The OCI started out with overall positive reviews, and students who chose to attend an event with Stikeman also generally enjoyed themselves. However, respondents felt “pressure” at the in-firm stage, with one student particularly put-off with respect to the level of aggression exhibited by a senior partner in talking about other firms. Another didn’t appreciate getting no response from recruiting when senior partners had encouraged him/her to return. Hopefully for Stikeman, the negative impression left with some students will not affect their reputation moving forward.

Torkin Manes (#11)

The high ranking for this firm appears to be a function of the smaller pool of candidates the firm interviewed. Students described the OCI as “awkward” although the interviewers were nice. Additionally, the firm was described overall as “female-friendly … with progressive policies.”

Torys (#1)

Finishing as the top-ranked full-service firm for the second time in three years (edged out by Fasken for the number 1 spot last year), Torys appears to have recruiting down to an art. With 8 of 20 hires coming from the hallowed halls of Flavelle, U of T really cleaned up. The OCI received mixed reviews, oscillating from “boring” and “unmemorable” to “engaging and friendly.” However, the in-firm received wide approval for being “well organized” and friendly, with events eliciting numerous “fantastic” responses and praise for the 3 lawyers with 3 candidates structure (over dinner).

Overall, one student cautioned that they pressure you to keep returning.

WeirFoulds (#15)

With no hires from U of T, WeirFoulds seemed unenthusiastic about U of T again this year. Students generally reporting having “fun” during the OCI; however, one respondent found the events to be filled with “pretentious” and competitive students from other schools.

The overall experience was well summed up by one student, who quipped, “It's like the Netherlands: old and people know it, but it's clear that it used to matter a lot more than it does now.”

BOUTIQUE, GOVERNMENT AND SMALLER OFFICE FIRM RANKINGS: Bereskin & Parr (#10)

IP Heavyweights Bereskin & Parr dropped to 10th in the boutique rankings, despite hiring a student class that includes 3 U of T students. Multiple

Department of Justice (#9)

The DOJ was generally well-received, with many students suggesting that the interviewers were “warm” and “engaged.” One student had fretted that the OCI would be substantive and cold, but was eventually pleased to find that the opposite was true. With the DOJ, the interview process appeared to be educational in itself, as one student commented that it was “worth interviewing with – a great learning experience.”

Dimock Stratton (#19)

The Dimock Stratton OCI interviewers were described by students as “cold,” “bored” and “bland.” One student felt that the partners at Dimock were “outright hostile” and that “there is no way I'd want to work at such a small firm with people who are that unfriendly.”

Epstein Cole (#20)

Just 2 survey respondents rated Epstein Cole and both agreed that the firm was “disorganized.” Both relayed in-

Students that interviewed with this boutique labour firm found them “boring” but “honest.” When one respondent asked a partner about their most interesting experience at the firm, the student was less than enthused to hear the reply that they had “once gone to the Court of Appeal.”

Gilbert’s (#1)

Much like Torys has for the full-service firms, Gilbert’s has mastered the art of recruiting, earning the top spot among boutique firms for the second consecutive year. Students marveled at the “fantastic OCI team” and described the recruiting process with the “fun, young” firm as “amazing.”

Hicks Block Adams (#2)

Criminal boutique firm Hicks Block Adams was well-received by most interviewees. One student felt that communication may have been lacking, with the firm apparently failing to communicate via e-mail with candidates. Another student noted that the firm “almost wanted you to defend your choice to pursue criminal law at UofT.”

Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie (#5)

Labour firm Hicks Morley earned solid ratings across the board. Students felt that the OCI interviewers were “gen-

Koskie Minsky (#14)

Koskie Minsky demonstrated a wellbalanced outlook for some candidates, who felt that they “seem to value worklife balance more than anything” and that they didn’t take themselves too seriously.

Legal Aid Ontario (#11)

Legal Aid Ontario was generally wellreceived, even if none of their 15 student hires came from U of T. Although the OCI interviewer was “friendly” and “approachable,” one student remarked that the interviewer was “a bit dull.”

Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin (#16)

Many felt that the OCI interviewers at litigation behemoth Lenczner Slaght dominated the conversation, with one student feeling like they didn’t get much of a chance to talk, and another suggesting that “they enjoyed talking to each other more than with me.” Although one respondent felt that they were “very loud – but in a great way,” perhaps their average rating was influenced by those that felt otherwise.

MAG – Crown Law Office – Civil (#18)

Virtually all respondents panned the OCI process. Multiple respondents were put off by the “good cop, bad cop routine,” while another respondent interpreted it as “2 bad cops.”

The

Boutique Firm Rankings

9.5 8.7 8.8 7.5 8.5 9.3 8.0 6.2 8.5 8.5 8.0 10.0 6.0 6.8 5.0 9.0 5.0 5.5 3.0

4 3 4 2 2 6 3 5 4 2 1 2 1 9 2 3 1 2 1

10.0 9.5 9.0 6.7 10.0 8.0 0.0 6.0 8.5 1.0 -

4 2 2 3.0 1 2 1.0 4 2 1 -

MAG – Crown Law Office – Criminal (#8)

The MAG Crim in-firm interview was described as “tough,” “challenging,” and “intimidating.” One respondent noted that the interview “requires a lot of advance preparation.”

Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark (#21)

MDC did not leave a great impression on many survey respondents, as it finished 21st out of 21 boutique firms.

One student warned that genuine interest in labour and employment law is a necessity, stating that “they will be reading this into every answer.”

Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein (#6)

Although the OCIs were well-received, litigation boutique Paliare Roland earned top marks for its “great” and “well-run” in-firm interview process. Students remarked that they were able to meet a wide variety of members of the firm during the in-firms, although whether this is a positive or negative may lie in the eye of the beholder.

Ridout & Maybee (#15)

Ridout’s recruiter befuddled one respondent, who found his “puzzled frown” confusing. Overall, students felt that the interviews were “fun” and that “it seemed like a good place to work.”

Respect Scores

Scores

Events

# of Responses

8 11 9 7 12 6 2.0 13 7 7 4 2 11.0 4 21 5.0 14 5 4.0

# of Responses

8.4 8.4 9.1 6.9 8.1 7.2 8.5 7.4 6.9 7.6 5.5 7.0 7.2 7.8 7.4 5.0 4.6 7.0 5.5

In-firm Scores

Firm Gilbert's LLP Hicks Block Adams LLP Wildeboer Dellelce LLP Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP Smart & Biggar LLP MAG - Crown Law Office - Criminal Department of Justice Bereskin & Parr LLP Legal Aid Ontario Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP Brauti Thorning Zibarras LLP Koskie Minsky LLP Ridout & Maybee LLP Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP Shearman & Sterling LLP MAG - Crown Law Office - Civil Dimock Stratton LLP Epstein Cole LLP Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark LLP

# of Responses

Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Scores

OCI

interviewers were described as “rude,” “almost confrontational” and “very argumentative.” This was a stark contrast to the in-firm interview, where respondents were nearly universal in describing the interviewers as “kind.”

9.3 8.5 8.4 7.8 8.7 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.4 7.6 7.3 8.0 8.0 7.4 7.3 7.3 8.0 4.4 7.0 6.0 5.7

6 2 9 4 3 10 5 5 10 5 7 1 2 7 4 11 1 13 5 2 3

Overall

8.7 9.0 8.5 8.8 8.8 8.0 8.2 8.0 7.1 7.6 7.4 8.0 6.5 7.3 7.3 6.7 7.0 4.2 5.6 5.0 5.3

6 2 10 5 4 9 5 5 9 5 7 1 2 6 4 12 3 12 5 1 3

Composite Score

These OCI newcomers finished 13th among boutique rankings. Few survey respondents came in contact with BTZ, but one who did was disappointed that “they don’t send emails telling you they won't be calling on call day.”

Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti (#12)

uine” and “very engaging.” However, the “crazy interview style” of having the candidate sit in one room while interviewers cycle through got “somewhat confusing” for one respondent.

# of Responses

Brauti Thorning Zibarras (#13)

stances where they were left sitting alone in a conference room. However, the interviewing lawyers were found to be “personable.”

15

Scores

respondents found the OCI interviewers to be “friendly,” although one student claimed that they were “somewhat hostile.” The in-firm process was hailed as “straightforward” and students felt as though the firm accorded them with respect and did not apply pressure.

FEATURES

# of Responses

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

89.7 88.0 86.2 85.3 82.6 82.0 81.6 77.8 76.6 76.4 74.4 72.5 71.4 71.1 70.8 68.3 62.3 56.7 54.4 53.5 48.9

HALLOWE 20 PHOTOS BY JOSH CHAN AND JEAN LEE

E’EN PARTY 010

FEATURES

18

Shearman & Sterling (#17)

The upbeat and engaging interviewers from this American firm earned them a fourth-place finish in this year’s rankings.

However, despite the fun students had, at least one respondent was disappointed by the “very specialized work” that they do.

Smart & Biggar (#7)

Survey respondents generally found the recruiting process with Smart & Biggar to be a pleasant experience. Students were pleased to find that the interviewers were “friendly” and “very interested” in their candidates’ past experiences. The directness of their communications earned them points with some respondents.

2007 Score (Rank)

89.7 88.0 86.2 85.3 82.6 82.0 81.6 77.8 76.6 76.4 74.4 72.5 71.4 71.1 70.8 68.3 62.3 56.7 54.4 53.5 48.9

2008 Score (Rank)

Firm 1 Gilbert's LLP 2 Hicks Block Adams LLP 3 Wildeboer Dellelce LLP 4 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 5 Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP 6 Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP 7 Smart & Biggar LLP 8 MAG - Crown Law Office - Criminal 9 Department of Justice 10 Bereskin & Parr LLP 11 Legal Aid Ontario 12 Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP 13 Brauti Thorning Zibarras LLP 14 Koskie Minsky LLP 15 Ridout & Maybee LLP 16 Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP 17 Shearman & Sterling LLP 18 MAG - Crown Law Office - Civil 19 Dimock Stratton LLP 20 Epstein Cole LLP 21 Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark LLP

2009 Score (Rank)

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (#4)

Wildeboer Dellelce (#3)

Boutique Firm Historical Rankings

2010 Score

Students were generally not impressed by the Toronto office of NYC behemoth Shearman and Sterling, with one student questioning why they would want to work on Bay Street with a New York firm. Another respondent felt that the interviewer “was not interested in being there.”

ULTRA VIRES

92.2 (1) 60.7 (10) 69.4 (6) 79.9 (6) 73.3 (15) 70.9 (6) 73.3 (16) 60.6 (11) 72.8 (3) 84.8 (4) 87.5 (1) 71.2 (5) 78.3 (8) 81.2 (2) 72.0 (17) 67.0 (7) 54.8 (23) 53.6 (12) 63.8 (7) 87.9 (3) 82.3 (3) 45.8 (9) 66.1 (20) 70.2 (18) 73.8 (14) 77.9 (9) 43.9 (10) 75.4 (11) 72.6 (5) 71.9 (4) 78.7 (7) 67.0 (7) 69.1 (19) 63.4 (9) 61.1 (8) 74.5 (13) 64.5 (21) 66.5 (8) -

In their own words:

Corporate boutique firm Wildeboer Dellelce impressed virtually every candidate that walked through its doors, curtained or otherwise. The “laid back” interviewers relaxed many students, and multiple respondents maintained that laughter was commonplace during the OCI. One candidate suggests that the firm is a “great alternative to the big firms” for those that are “extroverted and a self-starter.”

CDO – The Good, The Bad & The Ugly

During interview season, it seems commonplace to hear CDO horror stories and complaints.

This year, Ultra Vires decided to add CDO feedback to the recruitment survey. 100 students provided feedback, so we can finally evaluate how they stack up.

Overall, the CDO received a passing, slightly above-average grade. They were considered most helpful in terms of their availability and their presence at the Octo-

The unvarnished truth about OCIs, in-firms, and all the rest

We asked students to offer up their war stories, their rants, their tips and advice. For 1Ls looking to run through next year’s OCI gauntlet, here are some words of wisdom (all statements are taken verbatim from survey answers; absolutely no edits have been made):

- I was chatting with a high-up partner at a firm breakfast. A student from Ottawa who was sort of 'poaching' other people's conversations cut in front of me, with his back to me, to speak to this partner, and opened with the line "Oh my god, I love your watch. I hope one day I can afford a watch like that." I took the opportunity to grab a drink of water -- to push the puke back down into my stomach.

- One (in firm) interviewer asked me "has anyone ever told you you talk too much".

- In one OCI an interviewer told me that I "didn't seem like an asshole" - The ominous post-offer day Facebook silence - it was the first time while at law school I felt as awkward around my classmates.

- I heard this interaction at a dinner attended by potential recruits and lawyers: Student: "It seems like LSUC only cares about lawyers' bad behaviour if it concerns money. You can have sex with your 16-year-old client, and that's fine, but if you take any trust-fund money, you're cooked."

[Long, awkward pause. Throat-clearing.]

Lawyer: ... Well, the lawyer in the case you're referring

to actually went away for three years. To prison. And his license was revoked. So I'm not really sure it's as you say...

- One partner at a large, prestigious firm, after a couple of single malts, quietly confided that his firm would be a terrible place to work as a young lawyer. He said the bigger the deal, the more boring the work for junior lawyers, and that I should work at a mid-sized firm and call him in 5 years.

- "At this stage, we're not allowed to make you an offer.

I know you're not asking that question, but if you did, we wouldn't be allowed to answer it, so I can't tell you whether we're going to be making you an offer, or not.

But I would like to emphasize that I am not telling you that we're not going to make you an offer."

- During one in-firm, a partner I met with referred to her office plant as Seymour. I asked her why she called it Seymour. "Because it sees more of me than my family," she said.

- Starts out feeling like a cattle auction. Slowly transitions into speed dating.

- Interviewer to student at OCI's: "You must do well with the ladies... I have a light at my place that needs fixing, maybe you could come take a look at it?"

- "I think he was coming onto me..." - Student emerging from OCI - This process is totally artificial and surreal, and at the end of the day success really depends on strategy. I had no idea what I really wanted going in, but in order to

succeed in the process you have to figure something out, otherwise you`re not going to know how to play your cards and where to go.

Many upper years gave me the impression that it would be very clear how to read where firms stood on you, and while it was easy to read when they weren`t that interested in you, reading interest was in fact really difficult and made the process all the more challenging, because if you wanted a job, you had to play your cards with those firms that sustained an interest in you.

The thing that I appreciated most from firms was communication--firms who were in contact before call day, firms who were honest during the recruitment process about where they stood--were the ones I respected most, and who didn`t lead people on.

- The initial screen is largely determined by grades. The next step is a combination of luck and personality. If a firm decides they want you from the onset though, you can have no personality and they would still hire you.

- Given the large amount of time needing to be devoted to call-backs at firms of interest, my experience was that more than 4 in-firms would have been too many for me and ultimately deleterious. In short, more accommodation for the diverse needs and propensities of students may have been in order at this stage.

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

FEATURES

Other students found it was necessary to “consult an articling student at the government offices to get an accurate sense of what interviews were like and what kinds of questions were asked. Had I relied on CDO alone I would have been toCommunication There was general consensus that “the tally unprepared.” amount of emails they sent out was at times annoying,” although “their need to Rants and Regrets keep us informed” was “understandable.” One student, perhaps overly harshly, Regrettably, respondents felt “the CDO wrote, “I will never forgive them for not

19

Others had more standard complaints, including trying to make appointments to prepare for in-firms and finding “no space left.” But in considering the accommodating nature of the CDO staff described in other positive comments, UV staff think it is more likely that the stuGeneral love of the CDO staff dent did not properly anticipate the busy Many students found that the CDO schedule before interviews and failed to were “extraordinarily helpful” this year. get in touch with the office far enough in Students really appreciated the fact that advance. both Jennifer and Emily answered emails Finally, a few in a timely The Effect of Meeting with the CDO students wished fashion and for “more tips on proved to be Met with CDO? Mean # of OCIs Mean # of In-firms Mean # of Offers % Receiving 1+ Offer how to answer great sources Before submitting applications Only 9.5 4.5 1.4 74.4 particular quesof “moral Before interviews only 8.1 4.8 1.4 75.0 tions and how to s u p p o r t ” Both before submitting applications and interviews 14.6 7.1 1.6 93.3 better strategize Did not meet with CDO 8.8 5.3 1.5 71.4 throughout on call day and the process, even going so far as to pro- did a terrible job of managing the online insisting that I apply more widely! I was vide their personal cell phone numbers to system on results day [when OCI inter- very naive, and they should have known during in-firms.” While there was plenty facilitate communication after work views were released]. They caused a lot of what I didn't – that I would probably of strategizing and answer tips available hours. Further, numerous students re- people unnecessary panic due to their lack have to apply more widely than I did to in the panels and in one-on-one discusget a job. They didn't encourage me to in- sions, for those students who were disormarked on the “genuine” and “honest” of communication.”

One student was confused about what crease the number of OCI applications ganized or unable to attend, perhaps advice they felt they received. One respondent observed, “They rock – they se- the deal was with Suzanne Bambrick’s e- at all, even though it would absolutely preparing a document on this for next year would be beneficial. riously care and take the time and babied mail address, suggesting that the CDO have been merited.” us the whole way through- i never more was comprised of “several people hiding needed to be babied!” Another “got the behind one email address (suzanne.bamsense that they genuinely cared about stu- brick).”

BY EMILY ORCHARD AND JENNIFER POON dents as people, not just in their capacity as HR technicians.”

Managing Student Expectations We are absolutely thrilled to have been appointed in our roles as Directors of the One student remarked that he or she Career Development Office. We are both graduates of the Faculty of Law and recOrganization felt “the CDO did a poor job of making ognize the tremendous talent, intelligence, and drive that University of Toronto stuThe CDO missed a number of dead- this recruitment season not seem like the dents bring to the table, alongside their outstanding academic, professional and lines outside of the Toronto recruiting be all and end all. In one of their emails extra-curricular accomplishments. We are honoured to be able to work with stuprocess (i.e. announcing Vancouver inter- they want so far to say something along dents of this caliber to assist them in finding employment and other pursuits that views), which was described as quite frus- the lines of ‘congrats on finishing in- are fulfilling, exciting and gratifying. trating seeing as this falls directly within firms, and indeed Toronto recruiting.’” It The University of Toronto Faculty of Law historically outperforms all other law their purview. was suggested that the CDO needs to put schools in Canada both in terms of the number of students who are invited to inOne student didn’t like the fact that stronger emphasis on other options earlier terview with firms during the Toronto OCI process and the number of students CDO events tended to fall on Tuesdays, on in the process. “With students tending who secure second year summer positions. Although we have not received an increating difficulty for students with prior to naturally get very wrapped up in the dication from all students who participated in the Fall Recruitment process as to obligations on those days. Additionally, process and place undue importance on where they will be working and likely won't for several weeks, the numbers that we out-of-towners and those with jobs found it, the CDO didn't talk about the 50% of have seen to date confirm this trend. Approximately 50% of the second year class that attending the summer events was students who don't get jobs through the has secured a second year summer position through the New York, Vancouver/Calchallenging due to their odd dates and OCI process until after it was over. This gary and/or Toronto OCI process. Fourteen students will be either working excluhours. Students would have preferred probably led to some students getting un- sively in New York this summer or splitting their summers with a Toronto firm. evening events, and would also have ap- necessarily stressed out during the process These numbers are tremendously impressive. We also have at least five students preciated videotaped sessions to accom- and over-defining themselves with the who will be working in Vancouver and Calgary. At least six students will be working modate those who just couldn’t make it. success or lack of success in finding a in government this summer. As importantly, we have heard from several firms that Additionally, although many students job.” participated in the Toronto recruitment process that this year's class was simply outgenerally found the panels to be useful standing in terms of experience, academic performance and overall maturity. This and informative, a few commented that Lack of preparation for Governis something of which we hope students are proud. In excess of 20,000 applications the panels and prep sessions tended to ment jobs or out-of-Toronto jobs were processed by firms participating in the Toronto OCI process alone this year, cause panic and freak outs. It was sugThe biggest criticism of the CDO in and to have firms take note of and comment on the excellence of our students is gested that if the CDO were to hold more general involved the complaint that the a remarkable accomplishment that speaks to the caliber of our student body. than one session (or smaller sessions), fear “CDO was not particularly helpful in re- Unfortunately, every year many of our outstanding students will emerge from the of missing out would be less likely to spect of government interviews.” Stu- Fall Recruitment Cycle without a position and for these students, the process can occur, and a smaller environment would dents complained of a number of faults: be devastating and the numbers of little comfort. We are tremendously proud of be less intimidating. However, UV recog- “The lists of possible substantive ques- our students, both those who have already secured jobs and those who will do so nizes that with many panels requiring tions that were given to me by the CDO outside of the fall process. To those people we say, repeatedly, that the lack of an upper-years or recruiters to volunteer were entirely inaccurate and did not steer offer from the fall process does not speak to their candidacy or mean that they did their time, scheduling multiple panels is me in the right direction.” Another stu- not satisfy some sort of benchmark. Further, not participating in OCIs and/or not likely not feasible. dent remarked, “They didn't hold a single choosing to aggressively pursue the positions that arise during this recruitment cycle Finally, the biggest criticism of the OCI preparation session for people participat- is an admirable choice and one which we hope students will not question, despite organization appeared to centre around ing in Calgary/Vancouver, and those cities now being surrounded by colleagues with jobs. Approximately 40% of the class will the scheduling of OCIs. The CDO re- have some differences to the process. secure a second year summer position during the remainder of the academic year peatedly explained that scheduling is a Also it can be much more difficult to fig- (almost as many people who secured jobs during the fall recruitment process). Furfunction of a computer algorithm and ure out who applied in those cities in pre- ther, the positions that arise during the coming months are every bit as good as that they have no control over the out- vious years - the CDO could do more to those that students were placed in during the fall and are tremendously diverse in come. However, students feel that this connect us with third years with advice or nature. method should be unacceptable if it re- hold events to help us prepare. I know For those students who are seeking exciting, rewarding and interesting second sults in students having twenty interviews there aren't that many of us but still - year summer work, please come and speak to us. We are here to help. on one day, or even five in a row. Perhaps doing nothing seems like a little too little!” ber OCIs; least helpful was the the October 26 student panel on November interviews. Specific comments left about the CDO appeared to fall into several key categories.

an investment in new technology with better control over the parameters in question would be the CDO’s best bet in terms of addressing this complaint.

The CDO checks in

OPINIONS & EDITORIALS It’s still Reagan’s country

BY BENJAMIN SHARMA (1L)

Very often, it is difficult to read what message a body politic is trying to send with a particular vote. People still argue, for instance, about the message of the "No" victory in the 1980 Quebec referendum.

The major commentators argued about the meaning of the outcome of the last Canadian federal election – a debate settled, perhaps, by how the proposed coalition government then fared in the polls in December 2008. There was an idea embraced by many in early 2009 that the latest American presidential election marked the rise of a new age of political progressivism -- an attitude exemplified by a headline on the cover of Newsweek in February*: "WE ARE ALL SOCIALISTS NOW." * http://www.newsweek.com/2009/02/06 /we-are-all-socialists-now.html It turns out that Americans were not all socialists. And many of them apparently believe, fairly or not, that the leadership of the governing party might just be.

It is difficult to put the magnitude of the rejection of the Democratic Party in November's midterm legislative elections into context without going deep into history, so I shall do just that. There are now more Republican congressmen than there have been since Harry Truman's presidency. Democratic representatives who were standing for election to a fifteenth term went down to defeat. At the state level, Republican politicians now hold majorities in state houses they have not held since the nineteenth century. More Democratic politicians were fired on November 2nd than were Republican politicians in the 1974 midterms in the immediate aftermath of President Nixon's resignation over the Watergate scandal.

head of the Club For Growth, an organization so economically libertarian that Governor Mike Huckabee labelled them "the Club for Greed.” Florida, land of retirees, has just selected a new senator who avers that Social Security and Medicare have to be on the table for cuts, to fix the budget. Wisconsin, historic home of the Progressive Party, just fired Russ Feingold, the champion of campaign finance reform, in favour of an Ayn Rand-reading plastics manufacturer who got his start in politics at the hot mike of his local Tea Party rallies. Hell, Ohio, the swingiest of swing states, has just given an eighteen point victory for the open Senate seat to George Bush's former director of the Office of Management and Budget. West Virginia deigned to elect a Democrat to the Senate only after he cut an ad that ended with the candidate literally putting a bullet through his own party's cap-andtrade bill.

At this point, it would not be a surprise to discover an empty tomb in Simi Valley, California, with the zombified form of its erstwhile occupant on the way to DC, moaning, "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. BRAINS!!!"

Still, one can over-read a mandate. As one libertarian wag put it in the days leading up to the vote, "this is not an election, it is a restraining order." And Americans did not just vote Republican in their largest numbers since Calvin Coolidge's presidency because they have fallen in love again with the Grand Old Party.

No matter how low the public's opinion of Democrats, Republicans who were viewed as simply not serious did not win their races. The landslide has been obscured somewhat by Senate races in Delaware, Colorado, and Nevada -- three easy pickups for the GOP had they only nominated candidates who were not seen as cranks. Christine O'Donnell spent time in Delaware fending off the effects of video clips showing her talking about witchcraft and masturbation; Ken Buck appeared to be on his way to victory in Colorado before he stumbled and called President Obama looks on ruefully homosexuality "unThere's a headline for the ages -- natural"; and Sharron Angle was the tar"OBAMA: WORSE FOR DEMS THAN get of a brilliant negative campaign by WATERGATE FOR GOP." CONTINUED on the next page Populist, anti-free trade Pennsylvania has just elected to the Senate the former

How the left created Ford

BY STEPHEN HUTCHISON (3L)

On October 25, 2010, a nuclear bomb dropped on Toronto, killing all 2.5 million of the city’s men, women and children and poisoning its soil for generations. Or at least that’s what must have happened, based on the left’s dire predictions about a Rob Ford mayoral victory. They painted a picture of a Ford-governed Toronto as a windblown, post-apocalyptical hellscape. Ford, NOW Magazine warned, would usher in “four years of anger, despair and depletion,” and “unleash a tsunami of misery on the city.” He would destroy civil society to strengthen his own power. Arts and culture would enter a new Dark Age. If Ford triumphed then, NOW solemnly intoned, “God save us.”

After Ford’s victory, cries rang out against the suburbanites – those loathsome, ignorant peasants – who doomed us to this horrible fate. Thanks to them, we now find ourselves under the jackboot of a monstrous tyranny, unparalleled in the dark annals of human crime.

Potential post-Ford Toronto landscape

For my part, I expect that in four years this city will be much the same, for better or for worse. However, if the left wants someone to blame for Ford’s election, then the place to look isn’t the suburbs – it’s in the mirror. The left seemed determined to govern this city like philosopher kings, adopting a lifestyle suitable to their station.

They voted themselves free passes to every artistic and cultural institution in the city.

They voted themselves free tickets to every significant event. In the depths of the recession, they voted themselves a handsome pay hike. The taxpayers paid for their lunches, their dinners, their wine and cheese, their transportation, their $20 000 retirement parties, and even their snack food, of which they ate $9000 worth. Best of all, they never apologized. It was all justified. They were worth it, every penny. Like Baroque princes, they weren’t about to let a few petty concerns spoil the grandeur of their reign.

If city council was the Palace of Versailles then Council Speaker Sandra Bussin was Marie Antoinette. More than anyone else, she symbolized the arrogance, entitlement and venality of city council. The taxpayers financed her every whim. This year alone, she spent $14 000 on her website and $10 000 on self-promotional mailings.

She used taxpayer money to sponsor a baseball team and then named it after herself – the “Bussin Blue Jays.” She sued a constituent for defamation and had the taxpayers pick up her legal fees. She called up John Tory's radio show under a fake name and insulted him. After her lie was revealed, she drove to the radio station to apologize – and the taxpayers paid for the gas. The final straw was using her influence to award an unsourced, twenty-year contract to one of her top campaign contributors.

As in 1789, people can only take so much before they revolt. People claim that Ford will be an awful mayor, and perhaps they’re right. However, the way in which the left abused their offices was simply unacceptable. Compared to that, the council’s legislative accomplishments are meaningless. The left created the wave of anger that Ford rode to victory. Now, the left needs to spend four years in the corner thinking about what they did. If they don’t like what happens during that time, they have only themselves to blame.

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

US elections - from page 20

Senate Majority Leader (and still champion!) Harry Reid.

Losing those three races took some effort, but, by gum, the Republicans were up to the task!

The 2012 presidential election looks to be a race to the bottom. The Democrats' reaction to the midterms amounts to sticking their hands over their ears and chanting "LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" President Obama admits only a communications problem; Speaker Pelosi has vowed to stay on as Minority Leader next year. (The RNC, formerly bedecked with a "FIRE PELOSI" banner during election season, now has a new one: "HIRE PELOSI") With the political tin ear over there, one might expect Republicans to waltz to victory again in two years. Their principal problem, however, can be summed up in two words: "Sarah Palin.”

Palin's cultural power is vast. Her documentary/reality show, "Sarah Palin's Alaska," opened to the highest ratings TLC has ever gotten. The Oxford American Dictionary just selected her portmanteau of “refute” and “repudiate,” “refudiate,” as their word of the year for 2010. The Republican base loves her -- her brand of free market populism has not been seen in a major party leader since the 1980s. Unaffiliated voters, how-

OPINIONS & EDITORIALS

21

ever – the folks who first put Obama in the White House in 2008 and just put the GOP in charge of the House of Representatives – get hives when they hear her voice.

So America's position can best be rendered thusly: one party is hellbent on offering up policies that the middle of the electorate hates; the other is hellbent on offering up people whom the middle of the electorate hates. That gives the country ... stalemate.

Given how the Delaware, Colorado, and Nevada Senate races went, the safer money almost certainly should be placed on Obama having an easy re-election in 2012.

But my liberal friends may find some images flashing before their eyes – these are unwanted memories, tucked away in the very back of their minds – of quite another unpopular Democratic president, whose advisors hoped and prayed that the Republican Party would nominate a joke of a candidate whom the centre of the electorate surely could never support. They may recall Writing for UV: the best thing since sliced bread watching their wildest dreams came true, and seeing their man hold a twenty-five percent lead in head-to- ten states in the following three presidential elections. head polls as his unelectable airhead of an opponent Be careful what you wish for. prepared for a hopeless general election fight. And finally, they may remember that they didn't win more than

Placing students on Bay Street

I decided to come to UT Law because I wanted to work on Bay Street. For me the financial burden of the exorbitant tuition was worth it because I was investing in my future. While many students come to this prestigious institution for academic and personal development, I came to this school because I wanted a job. I also think a lot of students feel the way that I do in this respect.

The truth is that learning under the best professors in the country doesn’t mean very much if I’m unemployed.

I feel that UT Law has let a lot of students down on the employment front. It is incomprehensible to me that a B-average student with strong extra-curricular involvement and great work experience receives few to no OCIs in the Toronto 2L recruitment process. It is also incomprehensible that some qualified, personable students that make it to the in-firm stage walk away without an offer.

I know that the first thing anyone in the administration is going to say to me is: “We have the best job placement rates in the country”. While that may be true, I don’t think it is sufficient to rest on this accomplishment. The UT student without a job does not take any comfort in this fact.

Some will tell me I’m being short-sighted because while 2L summer job placements may not be as high, 99.7% of our students receive an articling position by the time of graduation. Again, this provides little comfort to students who have not yet secured a summer position or an articling position and those students who aspire to work on Bay Street.

Finally, many people will tell me that not everyone wants a Bay Street job. I acknowledge that this is true.

But that doesn’t change the fact that there are a lot of students who do want, and aren’t able to successfully secure, a Bay Street job.

I understand that the Bay Street job market is competitive. But isn’t admission to UT also very competitive? Students at this institution are bright, engaged, and hard-working. Shouldn’t these students be able to get a Bay Street job if they want one? I think UT Law’s goal should be to place every single student who wants a Bay Street job, on Bay Street.

We may have the highest placement rates relative to other Canadian law schools. But I don’t think this means we can sit back and relax. UT Law needs to be

BY ATRISHA LEWIS (2L)

mindful of the changing legal landscape and recognize that there is always room for improvement. I want to make it clear that we cannot simply rely on the assumption that high quality students will automatically lead to strong job placement rates.

When I talk about this issue with anyone, I like to bring it back to my undergraduate experiences. I graduated from McGill Management, which has the highest entering average of any business school in the country.

However, if we compare McGill Management’s job placement in Toronto with the Richard Ivey School of Business at Western, McGill students fare poorly. I use this example to demonstrate that strong student inputs should not be the only thing a school strives for. Ivey allocates at least double the amount that McGill does to their career services and that investment has definitely paid dividends.

This point brings me to my first recommendation: funding. I think the law school should allocate more resources to our Career Development Office so that they can improve the services they offer students. A lot of the ideas that I will be putting forward require a stronger financial commitment from the law school. My second overarching recommendation is that the CDO should consider developing if they don’t already have one, or revising if they do a strategic plan for placing ALL of our students.

Strategies for getting students more OCIs

First of all, there needs to be a greater emphasis on marketing UT students. When I attended law firm open houses this past summer in Toronto, I noticed Career Office representatives from other schools in attendance.

These representatives were there to probe for more information from various employers and they were also there to market their respective law school. I never saw any of our own CDO members at any of these events.

The CDO has the advantage of proximity and our CDO should use every opportunity to let employers know about the quality of the student body.

The CDO also needs to be more proactive in establishing relationship with companies and organizations.

There is an established list of firms that come to campus every year. However, there are many organizations out there, even on Bay Street, that don’t recruit on campus and should. The CDO should be reaching out to

these firms and letting them know that there is a captive audience here.

Finally, I think the CDO should also consider making tactical decisions for the benefit of the entire student body. For instance, Osgoode caps the number of OCIs a student can do to 20. Therefore, top students must drop their excess OCIs and this creates opportunities for more students. I think a student getting 20+ OCI is very competitive and doesn’t need the extra OCIs. Perhaps UT Law should consider strategies like this to share the job wealth.

Strategies for getting students more offers

I also think the CDO needs to be more honest and frank with students. I think UT should consider making a mandatory application review for all students who are participating in the OCI process, before the process begins. At this meeting, the student should bring their transcripts and resume and participate in a mock OCI interview. The CDO should give each student an honest assessment of each student’s competiveness and ideas for improvement. This way, students can manage expectations going into the process, as well as make necessary improvements before it is too late. The emphasis on these mock interviews should be honesty.

I have spoken to the CDO about some of my concerns and they have been quite receptive to my ideas.

There has been quite a bit of recent overhaul to the CDO and Jennifer Poon and Emily Orchard have been fantastic new additions to the team. They are both graduates from UT law and as such I think they are in a good position to market us effectively. They have inherited a lot of problems and I do believe they are on the right track. Their biggest challenge remains the fact that there are only two full time people working at the CDO. Overall, I recognize that UT is ahead of the competition, especially when it comes to job placement rates.

But, I want to make sure things stay that way. I also want to speak out on behalf of my peers who I honestly believe got unfairly left behind in the 2L recruitment process. I think it is time that the Faculty takes a more proactive approach when it comes to job placement.

We need to make the CDO a priority for the benefit of the students who are taking on debt with the hopes of finding their dream job.

OPINIONS & EDITORIALS

The SLS rates board games as more important than animal welfare

22

BY ANNA PIPPUS (3L)

At least, that's what their allocation of club funding suggests. There are 31 SLS-funded clubs, and a majority — 17 — were awarded $300 or more for their operations and events. The club “Let's Play Board Games!” was awarded $175, while the Student Animal Legal Defence Fund (SALDF) clocked in as the third least-funded club at $157.

Now, I'm not saying board games aren't an important social justice issue.

Everyone knows that wars have been stopped over particularly strategic games of Risk.

It's just that SALDF has been busy this year. We organized a film screening that drew 120 people, featuring a celebrity host and the Toronto Vegetarian Association tabling with information and resources. Two of our members have flown to Portland for an animal law conference, and one has attended a conference put on by the Canadian Meat Council. We are working on research for two book chapters of an upcoming Irwin Law treatise on animal law. Six of our members have gone to a farm sanctuary to spend the day helping to care for rescued animals. Through the LAWS program, we have done outreach and education at Central Tech high school, and have three more LAWS events in the works. We have teamed up with students from other faculties to research ways to provide more vegfriendly options campus-wide, preparing to present to the head chef of the school and the food contractors.

We have attended meetings about re-

ducing the number of animals unnecessarily used in research at the school, and drafted the legal section of a website on the issue. And it's only mid-November. We expect to keep up this level of involvement and activism throughout the year.

The SLS allocated us $3 for printing posters for our film screening. Between finding a graphic designer to create a poster for us pro bono, and printing

hundreds of posters at Kinko's to post all over campus, our club members couldn't afford the time to submit a receipt to reclaim a sliver of the expense.

The SLS also allocated us $15 for food for that event. We racked our brains to think of a way to feed over a hundred people on fifteen bucks, but we just couldn't do it. Fortunately, a local restaurant, considering our work important, stepped up to donate a bounty of beautiful and healthy vegetarian food CONTINUED on the next page

ULTRA VIRES

One budget does not accountability make

The new SLS bylaw changes are a step in the right direction, but there is more work to be done

BY MIKE LASKEY (3L)

If you’re trolling through this newspaper, chances are that you’re looking for statistics about how many U of T students were hired by downtown firms. Forget about all that; it’s not important. Set thou thine own house in order first.

Two weeks ago, the Student Affairs branch of the SLS passed an amendment to the financial bylaw which requires the SLS to publish its budget at the beginning and end of each school year. Concerns about missing revenues and questionable bouncy castle expenditures aside, the bylaw changes are a positive step toward transparency, for which the SLS should be congratulated.

Still, there are lingering problems with accountability at the SLS, and Affairs should follow through on its bylaw amendments with institutional changes that will help to cure its historical unaccountability.

First and foremost, the SLS should take a hard look at the $18,000 it spends each year on the “Public Interest Advocacy Summer Employment Fund.” The Fund pays $6,000 to each of three students who support public interest institutions. Unfortunately, most students don’t even know it exists, let alone past recipients, eligibility criteria, application timelines, or projects that it has funded in the past. $18,000 is a tremendous amount of money (about 35% of the SLS’s entire annual budget), especially given that it funds wages for law students, and the SLS should codify strict requirements regarding eligibility and applications policies. The SLS should also add a section to its website devoted to the Fund, with information about past recipients and organizations that the Fund has supported.

Second, the SLS should publish its club

funding policies in advance of the deadline for funding applications. This year, the conference fund was scrapped, and changes were made to the policies regarding funding for food purchases. Clubs can’t plan their budgets effectively unless they know what is and isn’t eligible for reimbursement from the SLS. Third, Affairs should insist that all clubs post a profile and list contact information on the SLS website before they are eligible for funding. Currently, the ‘clubs’ portion of the website links to a bunch of blank pages, and many students don’t realize that half of the SLS’s funded clubs even exist.

Finally, the SLS must retain and publish copies of its audited financial information.

Almost 10% of the SLS budget each year is spent on auditing, and yet the SLS doesn’t have copies of auditors’ reports from more than two years ago. Further, those reports have never been published, even though students spend almost $5,000 on them.

They should be made public, and the financial bylaws should be modified to require Affairs to ratify the selection of an auditor at the end of each school year.

The SLS has come a long way from its recent practice of spewing vitriol on students who ask to see basic financial information. This year’s Affairs branch and executive seem genuinely committed to improving the transparency of the SLS, which is great news. The short institutional memory of the students’ society means that bylaw changes are the most effective way to ensure that their changes stick.

Now you can go back to looking at OCI stats.

OPINIONS & EDITORIALS

POINT/COUNTERPOINT

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

23

From the dawn of the 21st Century, North American politics was driven by a Manichean worldview. Now, almost a decade after George W. Bush delivered his stern proposition to the world, as we close out the first decade of the “Age of Terror,” we look back and examine…

“Have the Terrorists Won?”

The terrorists have won

Affirming our freedom

That’s it, kids. Get your shit – we’re leaving. You have to know when to cut your losses (someone should have told Joe Pantalone that), and we’re fighting a losing battle here.

The terrorists have won. And by terrorists, I mostly mean the Chilean Miners.

I liked the miners back when they were still underground. It was cool – it hadn’t been done before – they weren’t like all the other miners. They had cachet. But finally, after 69 long days of pretending not to hear each other masturbate, they were rescued.

They were lavished with attention at a level never seen before, and one that we may never see again until Michael Jackson dies again. Bennett Jones gave them all iPads, and they gave up their dreams of working in government. Stikemans took them to Perigree for dinner, and they conceded to themselves that 90 hours a week isn’t really that bad.

Torys took them to the human sacrifice ritual at Bohemian Grove, and they decided that maybe secured transactions were actually their life’s passion.

Then they stopped going to pub night, and it all began to fall apart. The terrorists won...

Oh hey 2Ls, how did OCIs go?

Sorry, back to the miners. I know the miners are worried about the mortgages they’ll have to pay, the significant debt they’ve accumulated from mining school, and the band of saucy mistresses (slash whatever the corresponding male equivalent of that word is) they will surely have to support to satisfy their massive sexual appetites. I know that they tell themselves things like, “Sure, I’ll just do this stuff for two or three years, and then after I build my resume I’ll come back to public interest mining,” or “If I don’t give Oprah a shot now, I’ll regret it later”. Don’t you see, Chilean Miners? You are proof that the terrorists have won.

What happened to those young, idealistic miners I knew last year? Those doe-eyed rapscallions dreaming of digging in the places where the world needed them the most? Something happened down there, in that mine. Some say it had something to do with an uncomfortable bulge in Dave Rotchtin’s pleather pants. Some say that smell particles from Haddon Murray’s gym clothes corroded their brains. I heard tell that those young miners just realized how hopeless their own dreams were, after they read one too many vegan posts by Anna Pippus on Facebook (which Arden dutifully “liked”). Whatever it was, the miners have changed – they’ve sold out. And that’s the proof in the pudding.

During the blissful week of vacation that the 3Ls enjoyed while the 1Ls engaged their ethics and the 2Ls abandoned them, I packed up my moustache and headed South—to the deep Southern US of A, where the fresh taste of freedom engulfs you like gravy on grits.

The birds fly freer, the bullets fly freer, and people are as footloose and fancy free as the waistbands that hold them. “It’s like the Mediterranean,” I would offer; only “way less communist,” they would qualify. And in the comfortable clutch of these husky bands, they remain confident in the knowledge that the North American way of life has prevailed over the dark threat of terror.

As I fire-roasted weenies over a barrel in a trailer park in Alabama, stroking my furry upper lip and fending off occasional accusations of being a Jewish homosexual, I began pondering whether this same magnificent freedom had prevailed north of the border, and in particular, whether fear was dominating law school life at U of T. That is, whether the terrorists were not winning here at home.

There did appear to be some signs of desperate fright. Maclean’s has been reporting that a pack of wild Asians are swarming our campuses; the Law Review editors are constantly conducting shadowy “cell group” meetings; and the 2Ls have all frantically changed their facebook names to escape the terrorists’ watchful eye. Everyone, aghast, was cryin’ out Lewarne. At first glance, it did seem like our freedom had succumbed to our fear.

But despite what Mikhail Hamatski might lead you to believe, behind these flashes of chaos and distress, lasting beacons of good ole Western freedom prevail. Only in a society where freedom reigns supreme could Dave Rotchtin permissibly strut around in his black leather pants the way he so strangely enjoys doing. No terrorist could bear that sight. And, while nobody else really wants to bear it either, it is the quintessence of a robust democracy that a man may dress so foolishly—indeed, so freely.

There is furthermore no clearer image of anti-terrorist victory in our city than the mighty paw of Big Bob Ford crushing the socialist gravy train. No longer will City Hall tax and spend like some kind of silly government-like institution; that type of communism is for the terrorists. Toronto has triumphantly reopened for business.

So don’t let al-Hamata scare you. He frankly hates your freedom. Although it has been two years since Dubbya’s confident tough-talk was replaced by the wimp-speak of a foreign-born pinko Muslim, the continent is far from lost. While I can’t deny that Lwam does wander the halls of a white man’s conspiracy, at least he may choose to do so in tight black leather pants.

BY MIKE HAMATA (3L)

Board games - from page 22

for our guests.

SALDF exists because animal issues are badly disregarded in Canada. In 2008, 136,323 animals were used in what the Canadian Council on Animal Care calls category “E” experiments, which means they were subjected to, in their own words, “severe pain” but were not provided with anaesthetic or analgesic. In that same year, of the 2,272,815 animals used in experiments, 3,720 were cats and 10,525 were dogs. Cows, pigs, chickens, sheep, and even horses are raised, transported

and slaughtered for food in ways that would be illegal if they were done to cats and dogs. Ruminants in Canada, like cows, can be transported for up to 52 hours without a break for food, water or rest. (Cows usually spend 8 hour a day eating because grass is low in calories and they are huge animals, about 1,400 pounds.)

I guess what I want to say to the SLS is “thank you.”

Thank you for proving our point, which is that these issues are not considered important in this country. Despite the fact that other animals are no different than us humans in their ability to feel pain, fear, loneliness, fatigue, as well as joy, love, and satisfaction, they enjoy

BY BRENDAN MORRISON (3L)

almost no legal protection in Canada and are egregiously exploited because of it. Countries like the US, Australia, and NZ, as well as those in the European Union, view Canada as being one of the worst developed countries on animal welfare issues.

I need a drink. Maybe I can get one at a wine club event – they have $150 in funding, after all.

The ink of U of T, road trippin’, quirky profs, and napping profs...

D I V ER S I ON S

lawstudents.ca: why do we bother?

Pyke is a troll, but erinl2 is the new Diplock

BY MATTHEW BROWN (1L)

You read lawstudents.ca; I read lawstudents.ca. Let’s get over that embarrassing universal truth right off the bat. I read it because I once was a humiliatingly anxious applicant. I now still read it (very occasionally! Seriously!) for the smug superiority I get from humiliatingly anxious applicants. Maybe some 3Ls get something from my smug superiority, but if you think that, it means you’re way too meta and I hate you.

But besides what applicants get (as complete wrecks on the verge of utter emotional collapse) and I get (as a lonely narcissist), why is it here?

Why you read lawstudents.ca

What if all your profs, the administration, and the universe at large stopped telling you just how brilliant you are just by virtue of “being here?” (“Being here?” Like in BLH? I’d probably rather be at the W, to be honest.) Well you could totally log onto LS where UT autofellatio will be in full swing. Rejected by a lover / sister / seven sister / seven sister-lover? Fuck it, bro! U of T law is the shizzzzzxss and you are effin amaxxxxing for just for being here. And you have Pyke over at LS to prove it.

There’s also erinl2. What can I say about erinl2? I definitely wouldn’t want her as my babysitter, that’s for sure. Obviously what you want from a babysitter is for her boyfriend to come over. Then you can stay up late and watch the shows with swearing that the cool kid at school with divorced parents is always talking about.

You know, I have a feeling erin wouldn’t have been easily convinced. She’s a bit of a negative nancy:

LS. I just know that people read it to feel better about themselves:

I bet, back in the day when you were nervous and applying to law school this would have made you feel better. And yes, this makes you a horrible person.

So that’s why you read it. Why do you hate yourself for reading?

Why you hate lawstudents.ca

Why do I spend my time reading stuff like this? It makes me so angry, but not in the way that makes other people go out, protest, and generate clients for IHRP working groups. I can’t even be bothered to create an account to berate this person.

It takes all my available energy just to hate them in silence.

There is something so outrageous about someone who would not only worry about this in the privacy of their own parent’s basement, but actually go out into the world an scream: “Pay attention to my pitiful concerns and vapid existence.” But what does that say about me? I read about their vapid existence, screenshoted it, and wrote 120 words about it. Maybe that is what I hate most about the site: it is so hard to maintain one’s vague sense of superiority.

And then there’s the “chances thread.” That old chestnut! This is the worst part of LS because it has all that is the worst about the site (obnoxious insecurity) without the best (voyeuristic entertainment).

Of course that’s a great quality when some high school kid posts something like “who make more ibankers or lawyers lol?” What you want from erin in that situation is her trademarked (registered? Patent law? Mens rea??) “Neither. Go to school study hard, or you’ll die poor and alone.” And, in the end, she is one of the few people with this kind of trump card:

I’m going to tread very, very carefully here. I don’t want to appear to be smallminded, but unfortunately small-mindedness is what makes the world go round at

What I am supposed to do with that?? How am I supposed to know if you are going through a complete psychiatric breakdown and are about ready to crack? I want to know if you have applied three years in a row already and are going to collapse into a pile of human tragedy. That is what I came here to see. And if you can’t give it to me, I will have to start examining my own lonely and desperate existence.

And I already have law school for that.

DIVERSIONS

NOVEMBER 22, 2010 On a recent but unspecified Thursday, an Ultra Vires correspondent sat down with Law Follies Producer Marty McKendry and Follies leading man Lee Chitiz. Their conversation is reproduced below with our signature bare minimum of journalistic accuracy.

For the benefit of ignorant 1Ls and upper year social pariahs, what is Law Follies?

Marty: Law Follies is the annual legal comedy show. This year it’s a sketch comedy show.

Lee: ‘Sketch’ like SNL-style skits. Not like drawing. Make that clear in the article. No drawing. (TOUCHES FACE) Cruel caricature artists… always exaggerating features… my cheek bones can’t be THAT high.

I’ll make that clear. How did you two get involved in Law Follies?

Marty: I never had the makings of a varsity athlete, so I developed humour as a pragmatic defence mechanism. It’s nearly as effective as actual strength and bravery.

Lee: Just another stepping stone on my way to the top!! (SPENDS THE NEXT 25 MINUTES SINGING “GREASE.” WITH JAZZ HANDS.) You guys are funny, right? Say something funny.

Marty: Something funny.

Law Follies: a publicity attempt

BY LEE CHITIZ (3L) AND MARTY MCKENDRY (2L)

Seriously though.

Lee: Lake Titicaca. Homo erectus.

Wee-wee. (SILENCE) I have more.

You’re immature.

Marty: You’re immature. (MAKES FART NOISE) If you guys like comedy, why are you going to law school?

Lee: Money.

Marty: Justice.

(PERFECT COMEDIC PAUSE, CHARMING SMIRK) Chicks with money.

Why are you really here?

Lee and Marty: (SIMULTANEOUSLY) Intense social pressure to appear conventionally successful. (THEY LOOK SAD)

VIEWER KNOWN AS “DENNING’S SALUTE TO STARE DECISIS”) Will this year’s show have any cameos from profs?

Marty: I’m hoping to convince our illustrious Dean to eat Hellman’s straight from the tub.

Because her name is Mayo?

Marty: Yes. This year Law Follies is the week after the Vagina Monologues. Do you feel creative pressure to increase the number of penile jokes in the show?

Marty: All I can tentatively say is that our Hung Jury sketch concept is extremely promising.

Lee: Sometimes all it takes is twelve hung men.

LAW FOLLIES – CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS Can people expect nuLaw Follies is a legal sketch comedy show in February. dity?

Please send sketch ideas and scripts to lawfollies@hotMarty: Prominent mail.com by December 3. Anyone interested in perform- and widely celebrated ing will get first dibs in their own sketch. The theme is 2L Andrew Robertson “Anything even vaguely legal.” Late submissions will be will be performing a duly considered by a panel of garbage cans. cameo. I can’t speak to his artistic sensibilities Will this year’s show have any “classic” U of at this time.

T Law comedy references to Denning and cricket Lee: Yes. and the land of Flavelle? I love that sort of Why should students participate in Law Folthing – no matter how many times I hear it. lies?

Lee: (DIRECTS EXTREMELY Lee: Law Follies is basically like any VULGAR GESTURE AT INTER- extracurricular activity except that it’s

25 fun. Fun is fun.

Marty: Students can recover some of their criminally high tuition by gaining access to SLS-subsidized pizza meals not available to the student body at large. We have a lot of innovative ideas about toppings. Like maybe BBQ sauce instead of normal red sauce.

I’ve heard there’s a crazy after-party. Is this a good opportunity for 1Ls to finally hook up with those 3Ls who are graduating?

Lee: Wait, 1Ls are looking to hook up with 3Ls? Marty: I have heard about this youth custom of “hooking up” and I too wish to formally announce my eligibility for inter-year “you know.”

Lee: You’re not a 3L. You’re missing that 3L mystique.

Marty: But I’m 2L. 2L-git to quit. (SILENCE) And so very alone.

Uhhh…okay.

Marty: Please hold me. Hold me like a full-service Bay Street firm never will.

They never even say “I love you.” Unless they want you to do dirty things. (SHUDDERS) Lee: Obviously, you’ve never had a cash fight.

(LEE AND MARTY AWKWARDLY LINGER FOR FIFTEEN SECONDS THEN LEAVE)

UV asked 11 professors to tell us something quirky about themselves. Can you match the prof to their quirky fact? b)

a)

c)

1) Rides his/her bike to school from Etobicoke (15 km each way) year-round

2) Once mail-ordered a pair of black, python-skinned Larry Mahan cowboy boots from Texas after watching No Country For Old Men 3) Is writing a book on Pierson v. Post

4) Was a blackjack dealer at a casino before going to law school

e)

d)

f)

5) Learned how to sing when they turned 50 6) Identifies as a Trekkie

7) Worked as a harm reduction counselor, travelling through British Columbia with a briefcase stuffed full of condoms, wooden dildos and syringes to teach kids everything they need to know about safe sex and drugs 8) Loves True Blood

i)

h)

j)

k)

9) Shortly after this professor moved to Canada from the US to start teaching at the Faculty of Law, he/she attended an event where the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario initiated the event with a toast. At the end, he raised his glass and said, "La Reine". This professor turned to Kent Roach sitting next to him and asked "Who's Lorraine?"

10) Headed up a group of law professors who rocked out with Bruce Springsteen after a conference in Arizona.

11) Ate peanut butter and honey sandwiches for lunch every day in all five years of high school Answer Key a) Prof. Iacobucci – 11; b) Prof. Emon – 9; c) Prof. Stewart – 6; d) Prof. Alarie – 1; e) Prof. Fernandez – 3; f) Prof.

Fadel – 8; g) Prof Morgan – 2; h) Prof. Macklin – 4; i) Prof Phillips – 5; j) Prof. Sanderson – 7; k) Prof. Roach - 10

g)

26

DIVERSIONS

The tattoos of U of T law

Can you guess which U of T law student each tattoo belongs to?

PHOTOS BY JOSH CHAN (3L)

ULTRA VIRES

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

DIVERSIONS

27

DIVERSIONS

The spirit of exploration

28

ULTRA VIRES

A road trip through the United States with Will Morrison AMERICA. You know it. I know it. Need we say more? Just get in the damn car. We're going on a roadie!

We'll begin our trip with a quick stop-over in Hell, Michigan. The appropriate season, jocularly-speaking, for visiting Hell is of course in winter, when jokes about snowballs and probabilities can be made with a sufficient degree of verisimilitude. Alas, we've missed the snowy season this time around, but these novelty hot sauces we purchased for $6.66 at Scream's General Store ensure that we leave happy nonetheless. Onward to Ohio!

BY WILL MORRISON (3L)

Jazz Museum and the excellent Negro Leagues Baseball Museum in just one day? Uh, well dummy, you might want to check the map again, because as luck would have it, both museums are in the same building!

Donald’s,” which teeters ominously over the highway.

Ample parking is available on either side. Once inside this monstrous facility, and having already perused the gift shop, we're treated to a great deal of McDonald’srelated trivia, the most interesting of which turns out to be that this location is not, in fact, the world’s largest McDonald’s. By way of comparison, the restaurant itself is slightly smaller than the McDonald’s on Bloor Street across from the ROM.

Check out the AJM and the NLBM in one action-packed day in KC

Our first stop: Hell

After tailgating last night's college football game between the Toledo Rockets and the Minnesota Golden Gophers, let's head to Sandusky - "America's Littlest Great Big Heart" - for some more family-oriented adventure. You go have fun spending the whole day riding some of Cedar Point Amusement Park's exhilarating rollercoasters. Don't mind me; I'm happy just taking advantage of the expansive park's many ground-based attractions. Truth be told, last night was a little more "amusement" than I've had in quite some time, and these wobbly old legs could use a bit of a stretch. I'll meet you back at the car later, and for goodness sake, if you think you're going to be sick, say something, and you can borrow one of my baggies.

Now, no American roadie would be complete without a visit to the great state of Oklahoma, or, as the locals call it, "The Great Big Heart of Middle America."

And just our luck, these hearts are about to get a few extra helpings of America, as we drop by the town of Gans, where NBA legend Bryant "Big Country" Reeves makes a decent living serving comfort food at his family-style diner. Between bites, Big Country points us through Tornado Alley in the direction of Tulsa, the state's second largest city, and known to native Tulsans as "the Big Heart of American Greatness." But it turns out we hardly need his directions, as we have no trouble simply aiming at the ginormous “Praying Hands” which tower above the city. This monument was erected by God's BFF, Oral Roberts, on the campus of a university he named after himself that espouses modesty to such a great extent that it's enforced by a code of conduct. We, too, have made no small plans here in Tulsa, and find time to enjoy both the Philbrook and the Gilcrease, homes to two of the finest art collections in America.

Cedar Point offers good, wholesome fun for the whole family

After your first ever Steak 'n' Shake experience in Pontiac, Illinois, we'll carry on to Kansas City, Missouri, and lay down for a well-deserved rest, which comes a little earlier than expected after that enormous dinner at the original Jack Stack Barbecue. Over breakfast, we finally deal with the elephant in the room - yes, I assure you, Kansas City is in Missouri, or at least the good part of it is. Having finally put that one to bed, we've now got a far more important question to resolve: how are we going to visit both the world-famous American

The former World’s Largest McDonald’s pays its respects to legendary Oklahoman Will Rogers

We'll get back on the road, and I certainly don't mind stopping and spending a little time in Lincoln, Nebraska, which is home to a classic, picturesque American university campus and its Sheldon Museum of Art, which contains the world's largest collection of 20th Century North American art; but if we're being honest, I'd really prefer to carry on to Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

Do they still have a park in the center of town with archways made entirely of discarded antlers at each corner? Let's find out! While we're there, we can head across the street to one of those touristy stores that sells exclusively "Big Dogs" t-shirts.

Hold on, what did that sign say? We're coming up to Reno! Unfortunately, but perhaps fittingly for a city that even the local Chamber of Commerce calls "America's Asshole," seeing Reno in the stark light of day is simply not recommended. Let's stay on the freeway. If anyone asks later, we'll just lie and say we went to Vegas.

Finally, to end our trip like Lewis and Clark before us, we've arrived in rugged, scenic Oregon. We'll celebrate in Grant's Pass, a sleepy town on the banks of the legendary Rogue River. Regrettably, I've been so emboldened by the spirit of adventure that I decide to order a pizza with seafood on it, from the inexplicably-popular Wild River Brewing and Pizza Company. Unlike Lewis and Clark, I proceed to spend most of my time in Oregon exploring the town's most expensive B&B, the Three Rivers Community Hospital, and my only "discoveries" upon waking up are an IV drip in my arm and a bill for treatment of a severe case of gastroenteritis.

I'm sorry our trip had to end on this low note. I really am.

Our gracious host in Gans, Oklahoma

With that last Steak ‘n’ Shake meal back in Tulsa sitting about as well in our stomachs as the bizarre foamy toxic sludge in the river that runs through the city, what better place for a quick roadside stop along Oklahoma’s Will Rogers Turnpike than at the “World’s Largest Mc-

Three Rivers Community Hospital: where our trip suddenly ends

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

DIVERSIONS

In defence of gunners (up yours, Matt Brown)

29

BY <NAME WITHHELD BECAUSE A FIRM MIGHT SEE IT>

Thursday afternoon, 2:59PM, my hands are sweaty, my heart is racing. One minute left on the clock and I am primed and ready for the ball. “Any questions,” the Professor asks. I look around. A nervous shuffle, a strained cough, a look of yearning as eyes dart towards the exit and back to the Professor, waiting for those powerful words. The ones which speak of freedom. I strike, my hand shooting up. “Yes?” the Professor asks. I am prepared. I have spent all last night in Bora getting ready for this. “Sir, when looking at this case, can you explain to me the philosophical and moral context of the decision. It seems like the Judge is adopting a Hobbesian point of view, but then by paragraph three, he spins out of control and goes into a sort of Lockean treatise on the theory of the mind.” Touchdown, straight into overtime we go. Nine minutes later, 3:08, class is dismissed amongst the murderous glares of those who can never be me. Cretins.

I read your article last month, “brah,” and feel the need to set the record straight.

There’s a reason I act the way I act. Now, I know this isn’t about weed or sports, so you may have a hard time following, but don’t worry, I’ll use small words so you can get the gist. In the game of life, there are winners and there are losers. Now, it would be presumptuous of me to say that you’re firmly in the latter category, Matt Brown, but when your idea of studying involves three hours in front of the mirror brushing your bangs out of your eyes, draw your own conclusions. Shit, is that too difficult?

I forget that not all of us got an ‘A+’ on Predicate Logic II in undergrad (at Har-

vard). Let me take a step back then, Matt. Law school is hard work and unless you’re willing to spend 14 hours a day at Bora to get your ‘A,’ you simply don’t matter as a human being. I know this mentality wins me no friends. Do you think I’m unaware of what you anvils call me behind my back? Do you think I’m oblivious to the fact that I will never know the love of a woman? But here’s the thing, Matt. When I’m a partner at Davies, I’ll have more than enough money to buy all the love and respect I need. That’s why I ask these questions or put in these hours. It’s not about you, it’s about me.

Still, you shouldn’t get me wrong, Matt, I need you. In the world of curves, you make me look good by comparison. Besides, when I divorce my second wife for Miss Brazil 2028, I’ll probably hire you as my family law counsel for just a few dollars less than I pay my nanny by the hour. There's a good boy, there’s a good boy, who likes it when I scratch his tummy, who, who?

But no, you still can’t have my notes. They’re mine. And yes, I will be the one to tell the Professor that we have a make-up class on Friday as per the website. Why? Because fuck you, Matt Brown, that’s why.

Re: In defence of gunners (up yours, Matt Brown)

BY MATTHEW BROWN (1L)

Why are you here? Gunners are hilarious and I mock them. I don’t like it when you come here and try to prove you are better than me at my own game. This is Ultra Vires: last refuge of the bitter slacker. If you want to compete with me, fine. I admit it: your word count is definitely higher, but I have to wonder what is next... Overhearing you use your outdoor voice to tell 12 of your closest friends that you are “top 10%” at crystal meth benders?

The sad part is, I’m glad you noticed. It is nice to know I have at least 2 loyal readers (hi grandma!). So goes the gunner circle of life: I ridicule you behind you back, but secretly I want you to like me and be my friend. I want the fame, the reputation with the profs, the summaries, and the prospect that, if I betray you, you might develop an eating disorder.

The Social Network: a Harvard perspective

BY CODY CORNALE (3L)

The Social Network is a 2010 David Fincher film about everyone associated with Harvard as elitist and conde- founder Mark Zuckerberg stands out above the rest. the founders of the social networking site “Facebook.” scending (including even the University President’s sec- As an abrasive, socially inept and seemingly misunderThe film tells the story of Facebook, from its inception retary!), the film unnecessarily weakens its credibility, stood Zuckerberg, Eisenberg creates a dislikable yet in a Harvard dorm to the controversy and legal suits though only marginally. memorable character that carries much of the film and that have since followed. Overall the film is even manages to add a humourous element. extremely well written and directed, relaying Whether this is a realistic portrayal of the acthe story in a manner that is both captivating tual Zuckerberg, however, is up for debate. and easy to digest. Fincher does an excellent The film is based upon Ben Mezrich’s book job of creatively flashing back and forth be“Accidental Billionaires.” In writing the book, tween present boardroom depositions and the Mezrich relied on Eduardo Saverin as his priprior events described by the testimony. mary consultant, and this is apparent as the Moreover, as a former Harvard student I film portrays Saverin in a much more sympathought the film did an outstanding job of thetic and favourable light in comparison to portraying the Harvard campus from a visual Zuckerberg. Nonetheless, the film lives up to perspective. The film blends real and re-creits billing and delivers an entertaining and enated scenes of the university and surrounding gaging story that is definitely worth seeing. area with such precision that it is difficult to Four stars out of five. tell the difference. From the inside of the dorm rooms right down to the jackets and uniforms worn by the Harvard Rowing Team, the film was well researched and visually accurate. If there is one criticism, however, it’s that Jesse Eisenberg is earning Oscar buzz for his portrayal of Mark Zuckerberg the film goes too far in pandering to the stereotypical perception of Harvard as being a place The film also benefits from a solid cast, and the perof arrogance and aloofness. By depicting virtually formance turned in by Jesse Eisenberg as Facebook co-

30

DIVERSIONS

Napping Stern...through history

ULTRA VIRES

Many students were enthralled by Professor Sternâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s quick nap during the Grand Moot. UV was shocked to discover that the Grand Moot was far from the only event of historical significance that Professor Stern has snoozed through...

NOVEMBER 22, 2010

NEWS

UV cooks: prime rib roast

31

BY JEREMY ABLAZA (2L)

This prime rib roast is a really great way to feed a lot of hungry carnivores because it takes almost no prep time and yet looks very impressive. To be fair, this was not my own creation. The optimum roasting formula came from the Best Recipe Cookbook. The keywords for success here are patience and planning. You just have to make sure that you plan well enough to (1) let the meat come to room temperature before cooking, (2) sit around at home and find something else to do while it is roasting, and (3) give the meat enough time to rest when it comes to the oven. It's also a lot of fun because I use a propane torch (like you might use for creme brulee) to sear the outside of the meat. If you have one and wish to indulge your pyromaniac tendencies, this is actually the most effective way to sear the meat because you end up with a perfectly browned crust while maintaining the medium-rare goodness of the meat all the way through. The blowtorch is also not my innovation - I stole that from Thomas Keller's "Ad Hoc at Home." It makes this recipe approximately three times more awesome.

Regardless of whether you sear with a blowtorch or on the stove, keep in mind that you don't actually have to brown the surface of the meat right then and there.

In fact, doing so will probably start to cook the inside, which will result in an uneven gradient of doneness. You just want to give the surface a head start on cooking. The hours in the oven will do the rest.

Ingredients: - Bone-in prime rib roast. Make sure to take careful note of exactly how much it weighs in pounds.

- Kosher salt - Cracked black pepper

Recipe: - Let roast come to room temperature before roasting. This generally means taking it out of the fridge at least an hour before you plan to stick it in the oven.

- While you're waiting, pre-heat the oven to 200 F. - Pat roast dry and sear on all sides over high temperature. This should take a couple of minutes a side. Try to be thorough and sear up as much of the surface area as possible. If you do this with a blowtorch (you will not regret it!), either do it outdoors or open a window and disable your fire alarm. And be careful!

- Once the roast is properly seared, season all surfaces VERY liberally with kosher salt. You almost want a nice salt crust on it. Then sprinkle some cracked black pepper on there.

- Cook the roast bone-side down and uncovered in the oven for ~30 minutes a pound. Go a little under if you prefer it a little rare; when I did this, it came out on

the verge of medium, which is a little more done than I prefer.

- Go find something else to do while the meat is cooking. If you are hosting a dinner party, then now would be a good time to prepare the rest of your dishes and/or clean your apartment.

- When time is up, take the meat out of the oven and let it rest on the cutting board for at least 20 minutes. Don't worry; it won't get cold. DO NOT CUT INTO IT, unless you want to lose all the juicy goodness. If you are so inclined, you can take that twenty minutes to make a quick pan sauce. In the rendered beef fat, brown some garlic and shallots and then add red wine, beef broth, and butter. Add a sprig of fresh rosemary and/or fresh thyme and let it simmer over low heat.

Carving: - Cut the bones off the bottom of the roast and save it for your favorite carnivore - Cut the roast in half lengthwise - Cut slices across the two sections. Lay the slices across a plate and season with salt and pepper, and then serve with the pan sauce (if you made it).

32

DIVERSIONS

ULTRA VIRES