THE STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY
VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1
•
SEPTEMBER 10 , 2002
OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW
• www . law . utoronto . ca j ultravlres
Students challenge online Headnotes Move to electronic version raises concerns over lack of consultation, accessibility BY GRAHAM MAYEDA "The students have spoken, and \\·e hear you ~o~d a~d clt-ar." That is the message the admtmsuauon wants to get across in their decision to eliminate the paper version of llcadnotes. According to Assistant Dean ~.ois Chiang, students have been complatn tng for years about the drawbacks to the paper version of Headnotes, which include environmental concerns about wasted paper. The switch to an electronic version of Headnorcs began yesterday with the launch of the first e-edition on rhe school's website. Students \\ill now log onto the "e-corn munity" section of the site, where the) \\ill han~ the option of vie\\ing posted notices by clicking on each individual link. ;-.:orice ttrlcs will now be the key adverusi~g mechanism for lleadnotes submissions, smcc .t.heir catchiness will determine wht•ther the notice draws rc:tders' anention prompung them ro follow the link to th: cornplctl' nottn•. \n archive of past II cadnotes \\ tll .tlso be a> atlabk· an addinonal aJ\'antngc f•>r studc.nts afr.ud of 1mss • 1t
f:
concerned about consultation around the sw-itch. "SI_-;, students and faculty were not approached. (fIt-ad notes] is important to student life on campus, and we are distressed that none of us were consulted. The dean could have at kast informed us of the change, because clubs dtd not know until Thursd:ty that they would have to submit nortc(;s electronically. I, as President, was completely out of the loop." . Matthews also pomted to accessibility Issues for those wtthout Internet access at home. "(The electronic Yersion of f leadnotesJ is not that casr to access. \\'e aren't like Rotman [Scho~l of Business, w~ch ~e<juires all students w have a laptop wtth wtrelt·ss network capabiliries)-a lot of students don't have computers at home. Librnry computers art• bareh operational at certain rimes of the day. Sl ~ 1s nor opposed ' to a full web-version [of fIt tdnotes), but we aren't at that stagt• yet. A pilot project should have been Jone." Other \\·ornes also exist about the sud· ucn chminatton of the paper edition of 1 lcadnotcs. ()ne IS a concern that stud<:u t surve)S, such a" lAst year's surve) on rnora\e at the b"' school, '\\.1\\ now have tCl be con t l (.! tu t nr tuJc:•n liL I t h a t
It
tu<.lenr: .. -uvhn clc.·c r.ronu:.tll)-;~ sra rt.~d h
re nd
to
''pcrntc
Ghiang. " \ swell, itmregrntcs our communications network \\1th our new web-interfaCt\ and allows students to ha,·e access ro Headnotes from horne." Desptte these advantages, a number of student groups votn·d concern about the new electronic formaL Jennifer i\lanhews, President of Students' rM1W Soctety, says that students at an Sl .S meeting expressed senous n·sen·atiom. In particular, they were
UVINDEX • • • • • • • • •
HEARSAY CONTROVERSY, P3 RECRUITMENT, P5 GIVING A HOOT, P6 ALTERNATIVE CAREERS, P8 CONVOCATION ADDRESS, P9 SUMMER STORIES, Pl0-11 KYOTO PROTOCOL, P14 NEW GOSSIP COLUMN, P19 ULTRA NEWS, P20
m c nr o t t:o n lmLJntf) \L'OUl'
1
-c. pen
61 n
"'11 b <:
!9
U71~:JCtiiJt
"c: 11 c;k
losr. on.J d 1at a
for r:ustng a\I.,Jrcrwss ,!round partlcu
Jar •~sues has disappeared \\1th the a<.h·cnr of the new li>rmat. "I'm aln·ady cros~·eycd from staring ar my computer 5creen all day," s:ud Alpta Davies on behalf of HEL.\!l.:T, a sruclcm group devoted to raising awareness about mental health tssues. "I'm not gomg to spend further time clicking and surfing through endless layers of passworcls and screens and titles every week to find something that may be of interest to me '-\"hen I don't even know what I'm looking for. 1\ n ecommunity is a medium through which people seck out specialised mtcrests. lt's not useful for any kind of mass broadcast acth·ity that's trying to get the attention of a whole spectrum of people." In response to these cnticisms, Dean Chiang stared, "It's simply the most efficient way of communicating. It won't please . everyone. If [~tudentsl have concerns they should bring them forward." She also point· eJ our that while no dectston has yet been made. some hard copies of Headnotes might still be made available to meet accessibility concerns.
1
Orientation 2002
I ,....---~~II!IIIIW•
Firtl\ -~car
..,u~\cnu~
\ UK C (\
\nca\<. n..~'''" ccn
o\<.'1.\ v i \\Ctl U\\ \\ \~u..
tor), page 2.
The $22,000 Question Provostial report may renew tuition debate BY ROBIN RIX Governtng Council's approvnl of a $2,000 tuition mcrt'l\Sc for first-yt.-ar law students has not appeared to silence the debate about escal:lting stuclcnt ft'Cs. On .\fay 2, the gO\-crning lx1dy of the lJnivt'rsity of Toronto rattfinl by a vote of 25 to It the fct'S schedule for 2002-03. 'The schedule raises tuinon for first·year hw students from Sl2,000 to $1-l,OOO. The law school's fi\'e-year plan calls for further annual incrt-ases of $2,000 until tuition for first-year students reaches S22,000 in 2006-
07. The law school's Faculty Council endorsed the five-year plan at its February 12 meeting by a vote of 37 to 13. The faculty members supported it by a 'l.'ote of 34 to 3, while the student representati\'es opposed it bra ,·me of 10 to 3. Immc<.liatclv after the raufication of the tuition fcc schedule, Governing Council con· sidcrcd and appro\'ed a resolution rno"·ed by
.Susan Eng, rhc fi,rmcr chair of the ·l oronw Pol.tcc Seniccs Hoard and curremly a gO\·ernmenr appointee on the Gcwcrning Council, nnd seconded by Add ~dra, the outgoing prmost of the WU\'Crmy. ·rne Eng motion prohib1ts further "substantial" ruttion incrc-..1ses until tht• Go\'ermng Counctl ts sansfinl that the current mcrcase neuher reduces access1bihty to the law school nor dbtons thr carter choice~ of JD students. The motion assigns responsibility for assessmg tht•se factors to the provost's office. lJ of 'ts new pro\·ost, Shirley ~curnan, took office in July. Detatls of the assessment procedure han: not yet been announced. During discussion of the ftve-yt-ar plan, various faculty and alwnni of the law school presented their opmions. Supporters included Brian l..angtlle, a law.· profcs~or at U of T, and Leonard Asper, a graduate of the
PLEASE SEE "GOVERNING COUNCIL," PAGE 3
www.casselsbrock.com/student.asp