051216

Page 1

VOLUME 49, ISSUE 54

THURSDAY, MAY 12, 2016

WWW.UCSDGUARDIAN.ORG

CAMPUS

SAN DIEGO AFTER HOURS

HARVARD

University to Penalize Single-Sex Social Groups Members of fraternities, sororities and finals clubs at Harvard will not be able to hold leadership positions. BY lauren holt

ILLUSTRATION BY ALEX LEE/GUARDIAN /GUARDIAN PHOTO BY NAME HERE

WE ALL KNOW THAT LA JOLLA SIMPLY CLOSES AT SIX. TIRED OF STAYING IN, THE GUARDIAN WENT OUT TO FIND ACTIVITIES AND PLACES AROUND SAN DIEGO THAT CLOSE AT THE MORE REASONABLE COLLEGE STUDENT HOUR. WEEKEND, PAGE 6

GREEK LIFE RESTRICTION

EXCLUSIONARY PROCESSES OPINION, PAGE 4

WOMEN'S WATER POLO move on to Championships

sports, Page 11

FORECAST

THURSDAY H 70 L 56

SATURDAY H 67 L 56

FRIDAY

H 69 L 56

SUNDAY

Photo by Emily Tipton / UCSD Guardian

Communication Department Displays Exhibit on Racism By kevin santos

T

he UCSD communication department opened its “Tell us howUCit” exhibition on Tuesday, which aims to serve as a forum for discussion about institutional racism. Organizers of the installation, which is located southwest of Geisel Library, encourage the campus community to post written messages as a way to join the larger conversation about racism on campus. According to UCSD assistant professor of communication Fernando Dominguez Rubio, the exhibition was organized by students and faculty from the communication department with the intent of creating a space for the UCSD community to openly discuss discrimination. “[Tell us howUCit] is a response initiated by the communication department [between] graduate students, undergraduates and faculty,” Dominguez Rubio told the UCSD Guardian. “We wanted to bring the [racial] discussion out into the open so people can share their experiences of racism at UCSD.”

See EXHIBIT, page 3

H 68 L 56

VERBATIM AS LONG AS THOSE PARTAKING IN CAMPUS CHALKINGS RELY SOLELY ON XENOPHOBIA AND RACISM TO MAKE THEIR STATEMENTS, AS LONG AS THEY REFRAIN FROM PUTTING FORTH POLITICAL REASONS FOR ENDORSEMENT AND AS LONG AS THEY REMAIN ANONYMOUS, SUCH STATEMENTS FAIL TO EXHIBIT FREE SPEECH AND INSTEAD TARNISH IT.”

— GUARDIAN EDITORIAL BOARD OPINION, PAGE 4

INSIDE EL NINO .......................... 2 CHALKING ...................... 4 “A MOON SHAPED POOL” 9 CROSSWORD/SUDOKU.. 10 BASEBALL SPLIT SERIES..12

Event organizer and Sixth College senior Nick Lopez emphasized that the event was not a direct response to recent chalking incidents, but rather to passive forms of racism that occur on a daily basis. “This isn’t about the chalking,” Lopez told the Guardian. “This is about the institutional and structural racism that persists in our everyday lives that goes unnoticed and unchallenged.” The event featured ropes tied along the trees southwest of the Geisel Library entrance. Attached to the ropes were papers with messages written by students and faculty describing instances and thoughts relating to racial intolerance. Event organizer and Muir College junior Hamoun Dolatshahi described the exhibit as a means of combatting policies rooted in structural injustice. “We are hoping that this event will encourage people to call for a change in policies that are holding others down,” Dolatshahi said. “In order to create a more equal and unified society, we need to help those who have

CALIFORNIA

Governor Signs Bill to Raise Legal Smoking Age The new state law changes California’s smoking age from 18 to 21 and restricts e-cigarette sales. By lisa chik

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed a series of bills, including Senate Bill X2-7, into law which will raise California’s smoking age from 18 to 21 last Wednesday. The reforms, which take effect in early June, will also include restrictions on electronic cigarettes with respect to licensing sales and their use in public places as well as an expansion of no-smoking areas at public schools. A stipulation in the bill exempts military personnel age 18 and over from the new restrictions. Other legislation signed by the governor categorizes electronic cigarettes as tobacco products, which cannot be used in restaurants, theaters, bars or other

areas where smoking has been previously banned. California state Senator Ed Hernandez (D-San Gabriel Valley), who authored the bill, said that the new laws are a “victory” for this generation and for generations to come. “[These laws] will save countless lives, reduce astronomical costs to the health care system, and cost very little because it uses existing enforcement mechanisms,” Hernandez told CNN. The tobacco industry threatened to seek a referendum vote to overturn the bills increasing the smoking age and restricting e-cigarettes. The Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association said in a statement that it would educate voters about the industry and differences between vaporizers and cigarettes. “California took a step

backwards today by reclassifying vapor products as tobacco,” the group said. “Stigmatizing vapor products, which contain no tobacco, and treating them the same as combustible tobacco while actively seeking to economically penalize smokers attempting to switch is counterproductive to public health.” When the bill was introduced, Altria tobacco company spokesman David Sutton said that the industry preferred the issue be handled by U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “We believe states and localities should defer to this regulatory process and give the FDA, the [Institute of Medicine] and others the time to review the science and evidence, before enacting different minimum age laws,” Sutton said See SMOKING, page 3

Starting with next fall’s incoming freshman class, any undergraduate members of Harvard University’s single-sex social organizations “unrecognized” by the school will be barred from holding student and athletic leadership positions or receiving recommendations for certain scholarships. All fraternities, sororities and final clubs, which are considered to be exclusive social clubs, because they are mostly single-sex, will be included in the ban. Harvard President Drew Faust sent an email to the undergraduate student body explaining the changes last Friday. Faust established the policies based on recommendations from the Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana, who framed the ban as an effort to eliminate gender discrimination and inequality among students. Khurana wrote about the chauvinistic nature of final clubs that exclude women, saying that the practices of singlesex organizations are contradictory to Harvard’s values. “The d i s c r i m i n at o r y membership policies of these organizations have led to the perpetuation of spaces that are rife with power imbalances; the most entrenched of these spaces send an unambiguous message that they are the exclusive preserves of men,” Khurana wrote. “In their recruitment practices and through their extensive resources and access to networks of power, these organizations propagate exclusionary values that undermine those of the larger Harvard College community.” According to Khurana, this ban is only part of Harvard’s “long and complex history of grappling with gender discrimination.” In the 1970s, Harvard officials spoke out against the practices of undergraduate allmale final clubs, viewing them as acts of gender discrimination and not conducive to the university’s intellectual and social climate. A little over a decade later, in 1984, Harvard’s administration no longer recognized final clubs when the exclusive groups decided to remain single-sex. This change in university status classified all single-sex social organizations, including fraternities and sororities, as being “unrecognized.” See HARVARD, page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.