The Highlander
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
For the week of Monday, January 25, 2021
VOL. 69, ISSUE 13
NEWS
est. 1954
ASUCR tables bill aimed to have UCR adopt the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism STUDENTS AND MEMBERS OF STUDENTS FOR JUSTICE IN PALESTINE RAISED CONCERNS ABOUT THE RESOLUTION THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA, STATING THAT THE DEFINITION INFRINGED ON STUDENTS RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH. or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities,” and one of those manifestations may be, “the targeting of the state of Israel.” A number of students criticized Students Supporting Israel’s attempt to adopt this definition oncampus, claiming that it would infringe upon the freedom of speech of Palestinian students and their right to criticize the state of Israel and Zionism. “I 100% stand against anti-semitism on campus, I would just like them to not use the IHRA definition because it is anti-Palestine,” wrote one student on their Instagram page. As the lead sponsor of SR-W21-002 Resolution Against Anti-Semitism, President Pro Tempore Orlando Cabalo motioned to remove the resolution from the meeting agenda, stating that he spoke to various
LAURA ANAYA-MORGA News Editor
On Wednesday, Jan. 20, ASUCR held their third senate meeting of the quarter in which the senate tabled a controversial bill submitted by Students Supporting Israel that aimed to have UCR adopt the International Holocaust Rememberance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism. Members of the student body spoke out against the bill through social media, claiming that the IHRA definition of antiSemitism promoted Zionism and hindered the free speech of students. According to the IHRA, the working definition for antiSemitism states, “Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/
JOSHUA WANG / THE HIGHLANDER
SPORTS
REOPENING BY FALL 2021 IS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE IF THE UC FAILS TO OFFER CONCRETE PLANS ON HOW THEY WILL ADMINISTER AID TO THEIR STUDENTS.
UCR women’s basketball beats California State University, Bakersfield 64-56 to get their first conference win KEVIN CONTRERAS Assistant Sports Editor
UCR’s women’s basketball team had their third Big West Conference game against California State University Bakersfield (CSUB) on Friday, Jan. 22 after various scheduling conflicts due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Despite their constantly changing schedule, UCR’s women’s basketball team came into the series with the momentum generated from their win against the University of Southern California on Jan. 17. UCR came in strong defensively into the first
quarter. Head Coach Nicole Powell implemented a oneon-one defense that kept CSUB away from the paint. The first quarter of the game went almost completely uninterrupted, with no pause in the game until the last minute of the quarter. The Roadrunners were quick on the attack, opening up the scoreboard with the first 2 points. The Highlanders responded with 2 points of their own. Both teams traded shots, and each tied with 4 points five minutes into the game. UCR tried to create a lead for themselves, but the CSUB Roadrunners stayed ► SEE WOMEN’S BASKETBALL PAGE 14
AFTER A TIGHT GAME, THE HIGHLANDERS’ FOURTH QUARTER ATTACK HELPED THEM SEAL THE DEAL. COURTESY OF UCR ATHLETICS
► SEE ASUCR PAGE 3
OPINIONS
RYAN POON / THE HIGHLANDER
A UC pipe dream: reopening without a good plan will be impossible MADISON RHEINS Opinions Editor
As of Jan. 11, the University of California (UC) President Michael V. Drake and the rest of the UC announced that all campuses will reopen by fall 2021. While this came as a pleasant surprise to all students and faculty, there was no clear presentation on how the UC plans to navigate toward such a goal, considering the slow distribution of vaccinations. It
seems as if the UC is tired of being in a financial bind and are heavily depending on how the Biden administration plans to roll out vaccines. However, even if distribution rates increase, it seems too good to be true that all students across the 10 campuses will be vaccinated in such a short time frame. At the same time, the UC offered no clear plan on the types of safety guidelines they would put in place or the type of aid ー if any ー that would be given
to students to expedite the process of getting them back on campus. Without transparency on how the UC plans on returning to business as usual, it will be impossible for them to completely reopen by fall. The UC credits the wide availability of vaccines as a reason to allow campuses to reopen, but this is not enough to guarantee that all students will be able to return to in-person classes. In the meantime, the UC should ► SEE REOPENING PAGE 8
f UCR Highlander Newspaper @UCRHighlander HighlanderTV NEWS 3
OPINIONS 7
FEATURES 10
RADAR 13
SPORTS 14
KUCR 88.3 FM