Issuu on Google+

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF GEORGE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case: GMC 4643-13 In the matter between: Lara Johnstone (1), Francisco Martin (2) (aka Gen. Patton); Soul-Friend Applicants Nanette Derenzi (3); Dennis McGinn (4) MI-Psych Integrity Applicants Timothy McVeigh (5); Erik Prince (6); Vladimir Putin (7); David Petraeus (8); Ray ODierno (9); Stan McChrystal (10) and John Mulholland (11) MI-R2R-B2B-Fam Applicants

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Brad Blanton (1); Maggie Doyle (2); Radical Honesty (CEO) Respondents Clive Henry Johnstone (3); Ann Elizabeth Johnstone (4); Graeme Henry Johnstone (5); Wendy Johnstone (6); Andre Bosman Johnstone (7) Biological Family Respondents Chelsea Elizabeth Manning (b. Bradley Edward) (8) Masculinity, Honour, Sex & War Respondent Taber Shadburne (9); Greg Small (10) Marina Dervan (11); Clara Griffin (12); Raven Dana (13); Anne Alexander (14); Susan Campbell (15); Stephanie Roth (16) Radical Honesty (Directors/Trainers) Respondents

Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Karen Marshall Johnstone Family Respondents Rachel Maddow Radical Honesty Respondents Judge Jay Bybee Radical Honoursty Civilian Applicants Military: David Coombs Radical Honoursty Military Applicants

MASCULINITY, HONOUR, SEX & WAR INVITATION: TO: Cain Jericho’s Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War: Chelsea (Bradley) Manning and: Anders Breivik

Jan Laaman

Mumia Abu-Jamal

Leonard Peltier

Horst Mahler

Thomas Manning

Jeremy Hammond

Albert Woodfox

Vladimir Vlasov

Jose Padilla

Terry Nicholas

Mickhail Klevachov

Bowe Bergdahl

Lynne Irene Stewar

Beate Zschape

Justin Wright

Edgar Steele

Ted Kaczynski

Marie Mason

Eric McDavid

For Your Information:


[1] On 17 October 2013, the aforementioned application was filed in the George Magistrates Court, Southern Cape, South Africa. [1.1] The Notice of Motion refers to a Legal Invitation to Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War to support MISO 528 004, MI6GASM project, a project to help Yuri, Alexi and Jack crash-land the End of Industrial Civilization (END:CIV1), as honourably as possible. [1.2] It is currently unknown when Presidents Obama and Putin and their national security advisors shall conclude that there is sufficient support for the POW submission not to be culturally2 emasculated3, of its fundamental MILINT Earth Day principles; to be submitted to the Swiss Federal Council. [1.3] You are invited to legally register your support or objection, by responding to this invitation; and to invite your activist colleagues to register their support or objection. [2]

Attached please find copies of:

[2.1]

The submission to the Swiss Federal Council

[2.2] Selected excerpts from the Founding Affidavit, with reference to Masculinity, Honour, Sex and War respondent Bradley (Chelsea) Manning and yourselves. [2.3]

All MILINT Earth Day doc’s are available at www.navyjag-humint.co.nr

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant Clerk: Submission to Swiss Federal Council George, South Africa Alien on Pale Blue Dot

1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hx-G1uhRqA http://sqswans-prh.blogspot.com/2014/01/radical-honoursty-culture-clerk.html 3 http://truthseeker2473.blogspot.com/2013/12/kennedy-after-two-years.html 2

2


IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF GEORGE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case: GMC 4643-13 In the matter between: Lara Johnstone (1), Francisco Martin (2) (aka Gen. Patton); Soul-Friend Applicants Nanette Derenzi (3); Dennis McGinn (4) MI-Psych Integrity Applicants Timothy McVeigh (5); Erik Prince (6); Vladimir Putin (7); David Petraeus (8); Ray ODierno (9); Stan McChrystal (10) and John Mulholland (11) MI-R2R-B2B-Fam Applicants

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Brad Blanton (1); Maggie Doyle (2); Radical Honesty (CEO) Respondents Clive Henry Johnstone (3); Ann Elizabeth Johnstone (4); Graeme Henry Johnstone (5); Wendy Johnstone (6); Andre Bosman Johnstone (7) Biological Family Respondents Chelsea Elizabeth Manning (b. Bradley Edward) (8) Masculinity, Honour, Sex & War Respondent Taber Shadburne (9); Greg Small (10) Marina Dervan (11); Clara Griffin (12); Raven Dana (13); Anne Alexander (14); Susan Campbell (15); Stephanie Roth (16) Radical Honesty (Directors/Trainers) Respondents

MASCULINITY, HONOUR, SEX & WAR INVITATION: TO: Cain Jericho’s Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War: Chelsea (Bradley) Manning and: Anders Breivik

Jan Laaman

Mumia Abu-Jamal

Leonard Peltier

Horst Mahler

Thomas Manning

Jeremy Hammond

Albert Woodfox

Vladimir Vlasov

Jose Padilla

Terry Nicholas

Mickhail Klevachov

Bowe Bergdahl

Lynne Irene Stewar

Beate Zschape

Justin Wright

Edgar Steele

Ted Kaczynski

Marie Mason

Eric McDavid

Proof of Electronic Service to POWs via relevant contacts BODY OF MESSAGE Sent individually to: Cain Jericho’s Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War: Chelsea (Bradley) Manning (GMC 4643-13 respondent) and Anders Breivik, Jan Laaman, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Leonard Peltier, Horst Mahler, Thomas Manning, Jeremy Hammond, Albert Woodfox, Vladimir Vlasov, Jose Padilla, Terry Nicholas,


Mickhail Klevachov, Bowe Bergdahl, Lynne Irene Stewart, Beate Zschape, Justin Wright, Edgar Steele, Ted Kaczynski, Marie Mason and Eric McDavid. RE: GMC 4643-13: Johnstone et al v Blanton et al: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation. For Your Information: On 17 October 2013, the aforementioned application was filed in the George Magistrates Court, Southern Cape, South Africa. The Notice of Motion refers to a Legal Invitation to Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War to support MISO 528 004, MI6GASM project, a project to help Yuri, Alexi and Jack crash-land the End of Industrial Civilization (END:CIV), as honourably as possible. It is currently unknown when Presidents Obama and Putin and their national security advisors shall conclude that there is sufficient support for the POW submission not to be culturally emasculated, of its fundamental MILINT Earth Day principles; to be submitted to the Swiss Federal Council. You are invited to legally register your support or objection, by responding to this invitation; and to invite your activist colleagues to register their support or objection. Attached please find PDF copy of the MILINT Earth Day submission to the Swiss Federal Council and selected excerpts from the Founding Affidavit, with reference to Masculinity, Honour, Sex and War respondent Bradley (Chelsea) Manning and yourselves. All MILINT Earth Day doc’s are available at www.navyjag-humint.co.nr; with direct link to GMC 4643 case documents. Last Court Date: 25 March: Case postponed by Magistrate Essel to 01 April 2014 for his response to Applicant’s request for preliminary order re: [1] Leniency of Court Procedure’s; [2] Confirmation of Electronic Service. Respectfully, Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant (GMC 4643-13) Clerk: Submission to Swiss Federal Council George, South Africa Alien on Pale Blue Dot

HEADERS Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:53 PM To: 'Chelsea Manning: Appeal: FBD: Nancy Hollander'; 'FBD: Vincent Ward'; 'Courage to Resist: Jeff Patterson'; 'Jeff Patterson'; 'Project Safehaven: Gerry Condon'; 'BManning.org: Press: Nathan Fuller' Subject: POW: Chelsea Manning: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: POW Chelsea Manning via electronic service to Appeal Attorneys & Supporters: Chelsea Manning: Appeal: FBD: Nancy Hollander (nh@fbdlaw.com); FBD: Vincent Ward (vjw@fbdlaw.com); Courage to Resist: Jeff Patterson (Jeff@couragetoresist.org); Jeff Patterson (jp@jeffpaterson.net); Project Safehaven: Gerry Condon


(projectsafehaven@hotmail.com); BManning.org: Press: Nathan Fuller (press@bradleymanning.org).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:18 PM To: 'Anders Breivik via: Breivik Supporters: Sebastian Ronin'; 'Varg Vikernes & Marie Cachet'; 'Kommander Breivik Report: Angus' Subject: POW: Anders Breivik: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Anders Breivik via electronic service to Breivik Supporters: via: Breivik Supporters: Sebastian Ronin (novacadia@gmail.com); Varg Vikernes & Marie Cachet (fremmedehenvendelser@gmail.com); Kommander Breivik Report: Angus (breivikreport@gmail.com)

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:19 PM To: 'Jan Laaman via National Jericho Movement'; 'Prison Activist Resource Center'; 'Anarchist Black Cross Collective'; 'West Denver CopWatch' Subject: POW: Jan Laaman: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Jan Laaman via electronic service to Laaman Supporters: National Jericho Movement (richmondjericho@gmail.com); Prison Activist Resource Center (prisonactivist@gmail.com); Anarchist Black Cross Collective (info@abcf.net); West Denver CopWatch (westdenvercopwatch@riseup.net)

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:24 PM To: 'Mumia Abu-Jamal via Mumia Abu Jamal Support Group: ICCFFMAJ: International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal'; 'Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition-NYC'; 'CA Prison Radio'; 'Collectif Unitaire National De Soutien A Mumia Abu-Jamal' Subject: POW: Mumia Abu-Jamal: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Mumia Abu-Jamal via electronic service to Abu-Jamal Supporters: Mumia Abu Jamal Support Group: ICCFFMAJ: International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal (ICFFMAJ@aol.com); Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition-NYC (info@freemumia.com); CA Prison Radio (info@prisonradio.org); Collectif Unitaire National De Soutien A Mumia Abu-Jamal (contact@mumiabujamal.com)

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:30 PM To: 'Leonard Peltier via Peltier Support Group: Free Leonard: Michaek Kuzma'; 'LPDC Committee'; 'Idle No More: Sheelah McLean'; 'Sylvia McAdam'; 'Jess Gordon' Subject: POW: Leonard Peltier: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Leonard Peltier via electronic service to Peltier & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: via Peltier Support Group: Free Leonard: Michaek Kuzma (info@freeleonard.org); LPDC Committee (info@leonardpeltier.net); Idle No More: Sheelah McLean (mcleanshe@hotmail.com); Sylvia McAdam (smcadam03@yahoo.ca); Jess Gordon (jessicagordonconsulting@gmail.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:36 PM To: 'Horst Mahler via Horst Mahler Acquaintances: Truthseeker'; 'Shoa Blogger'; 'Michel Friedman via


Central Council of Jews in Germany'; 'DE National Democratic Party: Leader: Udo Pastors' Subject: POW: Horst Mahler: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Horst Mahler via electronic service to Mahler Supporters & Acquaintances: Truthseeker (editor@thetruthseeker.co.uk); Shoa Blogger (hassokastrup@yandex.ru); Michel Friedman via Central Council of Jews in Germany (info@zentralratdjuden.de); DE National Democratic Party: Leader: Udo Pastors (parteizentrale@npd.de).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:37 PM To: 'Thomas Manning via Thomas Manning Supporters: Toronto Anarchist Black Cross'; 'Partisan Defense Committee-NY' Subject: POW: Thomas Manning: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Thomas Manning via electronic service to Manning Supporters: Toronto Anarchist Black Cross (torontoblackcross@gmail.com); Partisan Defense CommitteeNY (partisandefense@earthlink.net)

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:39 PM To: 'Albert Woodfox via Woodfox supporters: Free the Angola 3: Robert King'; 'Hermans House'; 'Workers World National Office'; 'African Socialist International' Subject: POW: Albert Woodfox: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Albert Woodfox via electronic service to Angola 3, Woodfox & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: Free the Angola 3: Robert King (kingsfreelines@gmail.com); Hermans House (acy@akademie-solitude.de); Workers World National Office (wwp@workers.org); African Socialist International (uhuruasi@aol.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:41 PM To: 'Jose Padilla: via: Estela Ortega Lebron: via Sun Sentinel: Michael Mayo'; 'Jan Susler: People’s Law Office' Subject: POW: Jose Padilla: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Jose Padilla via electronic service to Family (via media contact) & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: Jose Padilla: via: Estela Ortega Lebron: via Sun Sentinel: Michael Mayo (MMayo@sunsentinel.com); Jan Susler: People’s Law Office (peopleslaw@aol.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:44 PM To: 'Former lawyer: Michael Tigar'; 'Outpost of freedom: Gary Hunt'; 'Jesse Trentadue'; 'David Paul Hammer'; 'Death Row Speaks' Subject: POW: Terry Nichols: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Terry Nichols via electronic service to Nichols Supporters & OKC Truthseekers: Former lawyer: Michael Tigar (mtigar@wcl.american.edu); Outpost of freedom: Gary Hunt (webmaster@outpost-of-freedom.com); Jesse Trentadue (jtrentad@sautah.com); David Paul Hammer (deadlysecrets@att.net); Death Row Speaks (webmaster@deathrowspeaks.info).


Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:46 PM To: 'Bowe Robert Bergdahl: via: Taliban via: US Embassy Kabul'; 'German Embassy Kabul'; 'British Embassy Kabul'; 'India Embassy Kabul: Amb Amar Sinha'; 'Third Secretary: Security: Ajay Kashyap'; 'Turkey Consulate Kabul'; 'China Consulat Kabul: Amb Zheng Zingdian' Subject: POW: Bowe Robert Bergdahl: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Bowe Robert Bergdahl via electronic service to his Taliban Captors: via possible Kabul-Taliban Embassy contacts: US Embassy Kabul (KabulPress@state.gov); German Embassy Kabul (info@kabul.diplo.de); British Embassy Kabul (overseasNewportCCC@hmpo.gsi.gov.uk); India Embassy Kabul: Amb Amar Sinha (amb.kabul@mea.gov.in); Third Secretary: Security: Ajay Kashyap (Itbp.kabul@mea.gov.in); Turkey Consulate Kabul (consulate.msharif@mfa.gov.tr); China Consulat Kabul: Amb Zheng Zingdian (chinaemb_af@mfa.gov.cn).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:47 PM To: 'Lynne Irene Stewart: via Justice for Lynne Stewart' Subject: POW: Lynne Stewart: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Lynne Stewart via electronic service to Justice for Lynne Stewart: Justice for Lynne Stewart (1lawyerleft@gmail.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:48 PM To: 'Animal Liberation Prisoners'; 'Animal Rights UK'; 'Alliance for Animal Rights Ireland'; 'Rex Tyler'; 'Anglican Society for Welfare of Animals' Subject: POW: Justin Wright: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Justin Wright via electronic service to UK Animal Rights Supporters: Animal Liberation Prisoners (wonguy@juno.com); Animal Rights UK (Info@animalrightsuk.org); Alliance for Animal Rights Ireland (bigbrownrat@gmail.com); Rex Tyler (organicrex@googlemail.com); Anglican Society for Welfare of Animals (feedback@aswa.org.uk).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:49 PM To: 'Edgar Steele via: Northwest Front'; 'Free Edgar Steele' Subject: POW: Edgar Steele: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Edgar Steele via electronic service to Free Edgar Steele & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: Northwest Front (nwnet@earthlink.net); Free Edgar Steele (admin@free-edgar-steele.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:50 PM To: 'Jeremy Hammond via Jeremy Hammond Support Group: General Contact'; 'Free Jeremy' Subject: POW: Jeremy Hammond: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Jeremy Hammond via electronic service to Hammond Supporters: Jeremy Hammond Support Group: General Contact (contact@freejeremy.net); Free Jeremy (freejeremynet@gmail.com).


Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:52 PM To: 'McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11'; 'Support Marie Mason'; 'Earth First Prisoner Support Project Team'; 'Friends and Family of Eric McDavid'; 'Mark Reichel' Subject: POW: Eric McDavid & Marie Mason: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Eric McDavid & Marie Mason via electronic service to Supporters: McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11 (june11@riseup.net); Support Marie Mason (supportmariemason@gmail.com); Earth First Prisoner Support Project Team (neveraloneexhibit@gmail.com); Friends and Family of Eric McDavid (info@supporteric.org); Mark Reichel (mark@reichellaw.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:54 PM To: 'Ted Kazcynsky: via Anarcho Primivits: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF'; 'Fifth Estate'; 'Unsettling America'; 'John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim' Subject: POW: Ted Kazcynsky: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Ted Kazcynsky via electronic service to Anarcho-Primitivists & Acquaintances: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF (support@eco-action.org); Fifth Estate (fe@fifthestate.org); Unsettling America (spiritd_dude@yahoo.com); John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim (leila.ar2011@gmail.com).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:55 PM To: 'Beate Zschape: via: Zschape attorneys: Anja Sturm'; 'Wolfgang Stahl'; 'Wolfgang Heer' Subject: POW: Beate Zschape: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Beate Zschape via electronic service to Zschape Attorneys: Zschape attorneys: Anja Sturm (sturm@weimann-meyer.de); Wolfgang Stahl (wolfgang.stahl@stahlvonderinger.com); Wolfgang Heer (kanzlei@ra-heer.de).

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:57 PM To: 'Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov: via Russian Political Prisoner Support Groups: Taisyia Osipova Suppoert Group'; 'Pussy Riot Support Groups: Pussy Riot'; 'Pussy Riot'; 'Gay Russia'; 'Pravo Legal'; 'Free Voina'; 'Voina is Free'; 'Snob.ru' Subject: POW: Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov via electronic service to Russian Political Prisoner Support Groups: Russian Political Prisoner Support Groups: Taisyia Osipova Support Group (spasemosipovu@gmail.com); Pussy Riot Support Groups: Pussy Riot (pisya.riot@gmail.com); Pussy Riot (pussriotsolidarity@gmail.com); Gay Russia (media@gayrussia.eu); Pravo - Legal (info@pravo.ru); Free Voina (really@free-voina.org); Voina is Free (voinaisfree@gmail.com); Snob.ru (dear.editor@snob.ru).

CORRESPONDENCE Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:44 AM To: 'McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11'; 'Support Marie Mason'; 'Earth First Prisoner Support


Project Team'; 'Friends and Family of Eric McDavid'; 'Mark Reichel' Cc: 'Transparency Copies: Dr. Orly Taitz'; 'WRIF: Programming Comments'; 'WCSX Radio'; 'David Rovics'; 'KOMY-KSCO: Michael Zwerling'; 'Mike Malloy'; 'Becky Bond'; 'RadTimes'; 'The Free Mike Gilli'; 'CC: Kazcynski Anarcho-Primitivists & Acquaintances: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF'; 'Unsettling America'; 'John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim' Subject: RE: Marie Mason/Peter Werbe Objection to MILINT Earth Day GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

26 March 2014 Eric McDavid & Marie Mason c/o: Mark Reichel (mark@reichellaw.com) CC: McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11; Support Marie Mason; Earth First Prisoner Support Project Team; Friends and Family of Eric McDavid; Mark Reichel. CC: Peter Werbe, Public Affairs Director WCSX WRIF WMGC One Radio Plaza, Ferndale MI Transparency Copies: Dr. Orly Taitz; WRIF: Programming Comments; WCSX Radio; David Rovics; KOMY-KSCO: Michael Zwerling; Mike Malloy; Becky Bond; RadTimes; The Free Mike Gilli; Anarcho-Primitivists & Kaczynski Acquaintances: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF; Unsettling America; John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim Ms. Marie Mason (c/o Mr. Mark Reichel) and Mr. Peter Werbe Please find attached: MILINT Earth Day Clerk response to Mr Walker Lane (aka for Peter Werbe) Notice of Marie Mason’s plausible legal Objection to MILINT Earth Day GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 4:58 PM To: 'Chelsea Manning: Appeal: FBD: Nancy Hollander'; 'FBD: Vincent Ward'; 'Courage to Resist: Jeff Patterson'; 'Jeff Patterson'; 'Project Safehaven: Gerry Condon'; 'BManning.org: Press: Nathan Fuller' Cc: 'David Coombs Office' Subject: RE: POW Chelsea Manning: Re: GMC 4643-13: Case awaiting Magistrate Essel’s Referral Order to the High Court.

TO: POW Chelsea (Bradley) Manning (GMC 4643-13 respondent): via electronic service to Appeal Attorneys & Supporters: Chelsea Manning: Appeal: FBD: Nancy Hollander (nh@fbdlaw.com); FBD: Vincent Ward (vjw@fbdlaw.com); Courage to Resist: Jeff Patterson (Jeff@couragetoresist.org); Jeff Patterson (jp@jeffpaterson.net); Project Safehaven: Gerry Condon (projectsafehaven@hotmail.com); BManning.org: Press: Nathan Fuller (press@bradleymanning.org). CC: David Coombs Office (info@armycourtmartialdefense.com) Please note: Case GMC 4643 (Johnstone et al v Blanton et al) is awaiting Magistrate Essel’s Referral Order to the High Court. Details:


On 01 April Magistrate Essel stated that the Magistrate Court did not have declaratory order jurisdiction on foreign nationals or south African nationals on foreign soil. The matter would need to be referred to the Regional or High Court, but he was not sure whom; and referred me to the Magistrates Court Clerk: Sarita. Sarita discussed the matter with the Regional and High Court Clerks, and confirmed that the Regional Court does not have declaratory order jurisdiction over foreign nationals; only the High Court does. I asked Sarita to ask Magistrate Essel to issue a referral order, referring the matter to the High Court. She agreed, and will contact me next week, as soon as Magistrate Essel has issued the referral order to the High Court; whereupon I shall re-file the matter with the High Court. Regards, Lara Johnstone

Update: No Response Received Notice BODY OF MESSAGE Sent individually to: Cain Jericho’s Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War: Chelsea (Bradley) Manning (GMC 4643-13 respondent) and Anders Breivik, Jan Laaman, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Leonard Peltier, Horst Mahler, Thomas Manning, Jeremy Hammond, Albert Woodfox, Vladimir Vlasov, Jose Padilla, Terry Nicholas, Mickhail Klevachov, Bowe Bergdahl, Lynne Irene Stewart, Beate Zschape, Justin Wright, Edgar Steele, Ted Kaczynski, Marie Mason and Eric McDavid. RE: GMC 4643-13: Johnstone et al v Blanton et al: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation: [POW Prisoner Name]. No response received so far. In the event of no written response received by 14 April 2014; I shall conclude that you are (a) not interested in accepting / declining the Legal Invitation to support MISO 528 004, MI6GASM project, a project to help Yuri, Alexi and Jack crash-land the End of Industrial Civilization (END:CIV), as honourably as possible; and/or (b) if your inability to honourably respond to the invitation is a result of your objections to any of the principles enunciated in the project; you cannot be bothered to honourably inform the clerk of your objections or the evidence for your objections. Respectfully, Lara Johnstone Clerk: Submission to Swiss Federal Council George, South Africa Alien on Pale Blue Dot

HEADERS Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:29 AM To: 'Chelsea Manning: Appeal: FBD: Nancy Hollander'; 'FBD: Vincent Ward'; 'Courage to Resist: Jeff Patterson'; 'Jeff Patterson'; 'Project Safehaven: Gerry Condon'; 'BManning.org: Press: Nathan Fuller'


Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Chelsea Manning: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: POW Chelsea Manning via electronic service to Appeal Attorneys & Supporters: Chelsea Manning: Appeal: FBD: Nancy Hollander (nh@fbdlaw.com); FBD: Vincent Ward (vjw@fbdlaw.com); Courage to Resist: Jeff Patterson (Jeff@couragetoresist.org); Jeff Patterson (jp@jeffpaterson.net); Project Safehaven: Gerry Condon (projectsafehaven@hotmail.com); BManning.org: Press: Nathan Fuller (press@bradleymanning.org).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:30 AM To: 'Anders Breivik via: Breivik Supporters: Sebastian Ronin'; 'Varg Vikernes & Marie Cachet'; 'Kommander Breivik Report: Angus' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Anders Breivik: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Anders Breivik via electronic service to Breivik Supporters: via: Breivik Supporters: Sebastian Ronin (novacadia@gmail.com); Varg Vikernes & Marie Cachet (fremmedehenvendelser@gmail.com); Kommander Breivik Report: Angus (breivikreport@gmail.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:32 AM To: 'Jan Laaman via National Jericho Movement'; 'Prison Activist Resource Center'; 'Anarchist Black Cross Collective' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Jan Laaman: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Jan Laaman via electronic service to Laaman Supporters: National Jericho Movement (richmondjericho@gmail.com); Prison Activist Resource Center (prisonactivist@gmail.com); Anarchist Black Cross Collective (info@abcf.net);

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:34 AM To: 'Mumia Abu-Jamal via Mumia Abu Jamal Support Group: ICCFFMAJ: International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal'; 'CA Prison Radio'; 'Collectif Unitaire National De Soutien A Mumia Abu-Jamal' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Mumia Abu-Jamal: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Mumia Abu-Jamal via electronic service to Abu-Jamal Supporters: Mumia Abu Jamal Support Group: ICCFFMAJ: International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal (ICFFMAJ@aol.com); CA Prison Radio (info@prisonradio.org); Collectif Unitaire National De Soutien A Mumia Abu-Jamal (contact@mumiabujamal.com)

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:35 AM To: 'Leonard Peltier via Peltier Support Group: Free Leonard: Michaek Kuzma'; 'Idle No More: Sheelah McLean'; 'Sylvia McAdam'; 'Jess Gordon' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Leonard Peltier: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.


TO: Leonard Peltier via electronic service to Peltier & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: via Peltier Support Group: Free Leonard: Michaek Kuzma (info@freeleonard.org); Idle No More: Sheelah McLean (mcleanshe@hotmail.com); Sylvia McAdam (smcadam03@yahoo.ca); Jess Gordon (jessicagordonconsulting@gmail.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:49 AM To: 'Horst Mahler via electronic service to Mahler Supporters & Acquaintances: Shoa Blogger'; 'Michel Friedman via Central Council of Jews in Germany'; 'DE National Democratic Party: Leader: Udo Pastors' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Horst Mahler: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Horst Mahler via electronic service to Mahler Supporters & Acquaintances: Shoa Blogger (hassokastrup@yandex.ru); Michel Friedman via Central Council of Jews in Germany (info@zentralratdjuden.de); DE National Democratic Party: Leader: Udo Pastors (parteizentrale@npd.de).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:50 AM To: 'Thomas Manning via Thomas Manning Supporters: Toronto Anarchist Black Cross'; 'Partisan Defense Committee-NY' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Thomas Manning: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Thomas Manning via electronic service to Manning Supporters: Toronto Anarchist Black Cross (torontoblackcross@gmail.com); Partisan Defense CommitteeNY (partisandefense@earthlink.net)

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:52 AM To: 'Albert Woodfox via Woodfox supporters: Free the Angola 3: Robert King'; 'Hermans House'; 'Workers World National Office'; 'African Socialist International' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Albert Woodfox: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Albert Woodfox via electronic service to Angola 3, Woodfox & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: Free the Angola 3: Robert King (kingsfreelines@gmail.com); Hermans House (acy@akademie-solitude.de); Workers World National Office (wwp@workers.org); African Socialist International (uhuruasi@aol.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:54 AM To: 'Jose Padilla: via: Estela Ortega Lebron: via Sun Sentinel: Michael Mayo'; 'Jan Susler: People’s Law Office' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Jose Padilla: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Jose Padilla via electronic service to Family (via media contact) & Ethno-Cultural Supporters:


Jose Padilla: via: Estela Ortega Lebron: via Sun Sentinel: Michael Mayo (MMayo@sunsentinel.com); Jan Susler: People’s Law Office (peopleslaw@aol.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:56 AM To: 'Terry Nichols via electronic service to Nichols Supporters & OKC Truthseekers: Former lawyer: Michael Tigar'; 'Outpost of freedom: Gary Hunt'; 'Jesse Trentadue'; 'David Paul Hammer' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Terry Nichols: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Terry Nichols via electronic service to Nichols Supporters & OKC Truthseekers: Former lawyer: Michael Tigar (mtigar@wcl.american.edu); Outpost of freedom: Gary Hunt (webmaster@outpost-of-freedom.com); Jesse Trentadue (jtrentad@sautah.com); David Paul Hammer (deadlysecrets@att.net).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57 AM To: 'Bowe Robert Bergdahl: via: Taliban via: US Embassy Kabul'; 'German Embassy Kabul'; 'British Embassy Kabul'; 'India Embassy Kabul: Amb Amar Sinha'; 'Third Secretary: Security: Ajay Kashyap'; 'Turkey Consulate Kabul'; 'China Consulat Kabul: Amb Zheng Zingdian' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Bowe Robert Bergdahl: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Bowe Robert Bergdahl via electronic service to his Taliban Captors: via possible Kabul-Taliban Embassy contacts: US Embassy Kabul (KabulPress@state.gov); German Embassy Kabul (info@kabul.diplo.de); British Embassy Kabul (overseasNewportCCC@hmpo.gsi.gov.uk); India Embassy Kabul: Amb Amar Sinha (amb.kabul@mea.gov.in); Third Secretary: Security: Ajay Kashyap (Itbp.kabul@mea.gov.in); Turkey Consulate Kabul (consulate.msharif@mfa.gov.tr); China Consulat Kabul: Amb Zheng Zingdian (chinaemb_af@mfa.gov.cn).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:58 AM To: 'Lynne Irene Stewart: via Justice for Lynne Stewart' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Lynne Stewart: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Lynne Stewart via electronic service to Justice for Lynne Stewart: Justice for Lynne Stewart (1lawyerleft@gmail.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:59 AM To: 'Justin Wright via electronic service to UK Animal Rights Supporters: Animal Rights UK'; 'Alliance for Animal Rights Ireland'; 'Rex Tyler'; 'Anglican Society for Welfare of Animals' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Justin Wright: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Justin Wright via electronic service to UK Animal Rights Supporters: Animal Rights UK (Info@animalrightsuk.org); Alliance for Animal Rights Ireland (bigbrownrat@gmail.com); Rex Tyler (organicrex@googlemail.com); Anglican Society for Welfare of Animals (feedback@aswa.org.uk).


Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:01 AM To: 'Edgar Steele via: Northwest Front'; 'Free Edgar Steele' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Edgar Steele: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Edgar Steele via electronic service to Free Edgar Steele & Ethno-Cultural Supporters: Northwest Front (nwnet@earthlink.net); Free Edgar Steele (admin@free-edgar-steele.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:02 AM To: 'Jeremy Hammond via Jeremy Hammond Support Group: General Contact'; 'Free Jeremy' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Jeremy Hammond: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Jeremy Hammond via electronic service to Hammond Supporters: Jeremy Hammond Support Group: General Contact (contact@freejeremy.net); Free Jeremy (freejeremynet@gmail.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:04 AM To: 'McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11'; 'Support Marie Mason'; 'Earth First Prisoner Support Project Team'; 'Friends and Family of Eric McDavid'; 'Mark Reichel' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Eric McDavid & Marie Mason: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Eric McDavid & Marie Mason via electronic service to Supporters: McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11 (june11@riseup.net); Support Marie Mason (supportmariemason@gmail.com); Earth First Prisoner Support Project Team (neveraloneexhibit@gmail.com); Friends and Family of Eric McDavid (info@supporteric.org); Mark Reichel (mark@reichellaw.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:06 AM To: 'Ted Kazcynsky: via Anarcho Primivits: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF'; 'Unsettling America'; 'John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Ted Kazcynsky: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Ted Kazcynsky via electronic service to Anarcho-Primitivists & Acquaintances: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF (support@eco-action.org); Unsettling America (spiritd_dude@yahoo.com); John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim (leila.ar2011@gmail.com).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:08 AM To: 'Beate Zschape: via: Zschape attorneys: Anja Sturm'; 'Wolfgang Stahl'; 'Wolfgang Heer' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Beate Zschape: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.


TO: Beate Zschape via electronic service to Zschape Attorneys: Zschape attorneys: Anja Sturm (sturm@weimann-meyer.de); Wolfgang Stahl (wolfgang.stahl@stahlvonderinger.com); Wolfgang Heer (kanzlei@ra-heer.de).

Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:09 AM To: 'Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov: via Russian Political Prisoner Support Groups: Taisyia Osipova Suppoert Group'; 'Pussy Riot Support Groups: Pussy Riot'; 'Pussy Riot'; 'Pravo - Legal'; 'Free Voina'; 'Voina is Free'; 'Snob.ru' Cc: 'Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Judge Jay Bybee'; 'David Coombs' Subject: RE: Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov: Re: GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

TO: Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov via electronic service to Russian Political Prisoner Support Groups: Russian Political Prisoner Support Groups: Taisyia Osipova Support Group (spasemosipovu@gmail.com); Pussy Riot Support Groups: Pussy Riot (pisya.riot@gmail.com); Pussy Riot (pussriotsolidarity@gmail.com); Pravo - Legal (info@pravo.ru); Free Voina (really@free-voina.org); Voina is Free (voinaisfree@gmail.com); Snob.ru (dear.editor@snob.ru).


MILINT Earth Day Clerk response to Mr Walker Lane (aka for Peter Werbe) Notice of Marie Mason’s Objection to MILINT Earth Day GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation.

26 March 2014 Eric McDavid & Marie Mason c/o: Mark Reichel (mark@reichellaw.com) CC: McDavid & Mason Supporters: June 11; Support Marie Mason; Earth First Prisoner Support Project Team; Friends and Family of Eric McDavid; Mark Reichel. CC: Peter Werbe, Public Affairs Director WCSX WRIF WMGC One Radio Plaza, Ferndale MI Transparency Copies: Dr. Orly Taitz; WRIF: Programming Comments; WCSX Radio; David Rovics; KOMY-KSCO: Michael Zwerling; Mike Malloy; Becky Bond; RadTimes; The Free Mike Gilli; Anarcho-Primitivists & Kaczynski Acquaintances: Eco-Action Dead Trees EF; Unsettling America; John Zerzan via Layla Abdel Rahim Ms. Marie Mason (c/o Mr. Mark Reichel) and Mr. Peter Werbe Mr Walker Lane (aka for Peter Werbe) Notice of Marie Mason’s Objection to MILINT Earth Day GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation. Mr. Walker Lane (pseudonym for Peter Werbe) one of the editors at Fifth Estate, responded to the invitation sent to Anarcho-Primitivists and colleagues of Mr. Ted Kaczynski, by stating that he ‘spoke for the Marie Mason campaign’ with various demands and opinions. Lara: What is this is this all about? Why are you associating political prisoners like Marie Mason, Mumia, Leonard Peltier, Jeremy Hammond, and other people who need our defense with a right-wing mass murderer like Breivik, a fascist such as Horst Mahler, plus a host of others despicable characters such as Terry Nichols, an accomplice in the Oklahoma City bombing, a neo-Nazi serial killer of immigrants, and Russian nationalists? I can only speak for the Marie Mason campaign to ask that you completely remove her name from a list that mixes people who have committed despicable crimes motivated by fascist and neo-Nazi ideas from those authentic victims of state repression who deserve our support.


With great revulsion Walker Lane I responded: Mr. Lane, I have removed your name from the list. A simple request would have sufficed, without all your pretend bullshit. If you have sincere honourable questions, feel free to ask them, in terms of Radical Honoursty Honourable discourse principles clarified at MILINT Earth Day; and I shall be most happy to answer them. Until then, my apologies for my erroneous beliefs and benefit of the doubt that you may be honourable and sincere. Lara Johnstone Mr. Webre responded: I just Googled you. You are living proof the white race is NOT superior.

How to File a Legal Objection to MILINT Earth Day GMC 4643-13: Masculinity, Sex, Honour and War Invitation. You (“Mr. Werbe or Ms. Mason”) are more than welcome to object; to the impending MILINT Earth Day implementation of CommonSism international law for orderly and humane deindustrialization and a return to procreation and consumption based upon ecological carrying capacity limits. MILINT Earth Day don’t care much for personal political correct verbal diarrhea objections, based upon undefined accusations of ‘fascist’, ‘despicable’, ‘neo-nazi’, ‘serial killer’, etc; deliberately invoked by parasite1 activists as divide and 1 Parasitical Leeching Activists generally -- for psychological self righteous feel good, or other unexamined motives -- choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own psychological socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite activist ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching groups fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching activists – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching activist paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching activists focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking


conquer psychological warfare tactics to emotionally manipulate their particular ideological fundamentalist fanclub; from engaging in honourable sincere truthseeking problem solving engagement. If you personally object to participating; to the impending MILINT Earth Day implementation of CommonSism international law for orderly and humane deindustrialization and a return to procreation and consumption based upon ecological carrying capacity limits; because you believe that you are personally superior (morally, physically, psychologically, intellectually or otherwise) to people you consider ‘fascist’, ‘despicable’, ‘neo-nazi’, ‘serial killer’, ‘white race’, ‘superiority’; you are quite entitled to such subjective personal political beliefs. Your subjective beliefs about your individual behaviour skill, or generally speaking the particular racial, religious, cultural or other groups moral, psychological, spiritual, technological, intellectual, etc superiority at any particular behaviour skill; may in fact be true, or not. It is difficult to objectively (i.e. scientifically and/or legally) say, without your providing your particular definitions for these abstract terms, clarifying what particular skill you are evaluating superiority/inferiority in, and the evidence in support of your definitions. Legal Objections: If your objections are founded on rational honourable sincere truthseeking problem solving2 arguments and evidence; your objections, clear definitions for abstract terminology3 abstract concepts etc; and evidence for such objections is more than welcome. You are invited to submit a brief with your legal argument, and evidence for your legal argument; within two weeks of this notice of objection. Send your objection brief electronically in word.doc or pdf format; to myself at jmcswan@mweb.co.za. CC: Timothy McVeigh (truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com); US Navy JAG (JAGIR@navy.mil); RU: President Putin co Kremlin Press Office (press_office@prpress.gov.ru). Subject: Legal Brief Objection to MILINT Earth Day submission to Swiss Federal Council. being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while sociopolitically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘activism’ is PARASITE LEECHING ACTIVISM. 2 Problem solving activism only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined; i.e. the root cause of the problem clearly and succinctly identified. Once it is clearly defined, such activist determine whether there is sufficient political and psychological will by the relevant constituents to do what needs to be done to eliminate the root cause of the problem. If so, the activist acts. If there is insufficient will, the activist does not act, and simply continues to quietly educate to those willing to listen, clarifying the root causes of the problem; waiting until there is sufficient will; if ever. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed. Advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing. 3 http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/abstract.htm


Your ‘objection brief’ (and if relevant Applicants response to their objections) shall be submitted to the Swiss Federal Council, along with the Applicants submission, including submission’s list of supporters; for the due consideration of the signatories representatives, as provided for by the articles of the GENEVA CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR. If you do not submit your legal objection brief within two weeks of this notice -- (or if they need more time to prepare it, please notify the clerk within the two week period, of the exact date by when you shall submit your objection brief to the clerk); -- then your notice of objection shall be interpreted as nothing more than verbal diarrhoea objections. Sincerely Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant Clerk: Submission to Swiss Federal Council George, South Africa Alien on Pale Blue Dot


SUBMISSION TO SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL1 RE: GENEVA CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR, ITO ARTICLES 142 & 143.

Submission by Lara Bosman Johnstone, member of the Radical Honoursty culture, and South African Jus Sanguinis descendant of ‘Totalitarian Agriculture Scarcity Combatant Parties to Conflict’ citizens from France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. On behalf of Francisco Martin (aka Gen. Patton); Nanette Derenzi; Dennis McGinn; Timothy McVeigh; Erik Prince; Vladimir Putin; David Petraeus; Ray ODierno; Stan McChrystal and John Mulholland Applicants

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

03-14 December 2013 Æquilibriæx jurisprudence Military Necessity denouncement and recommendations for amendment of “Parties to the Conflict” and “Prisoner of War” definitions, respectively to “Scarcity Combatant Parties to the Conflict” and “Political Prisoner of Sex and War”; as detailed in Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War2, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950; in terms of Articles 142 and 143; and (b) Recommendations: Honourable ‘In Your Face’ Public Population and Consumption Reduction Campaigns..

“The seventh principle of humanitarian action in armed conflict says: “Contextualization: Effective humanitarian action should encompass a comprehensive view of overall needs and of the impact of interventions. Encouraging respect for human rights and addressing the underlying causes of conflicts are essential elements.” - Dec 1994: Dept of the Army, Field Manual 100-23, Peace Operations.

[1] [1.1]

Military Necessity notification to Swiss Federal Council argues in support of: Æquilibriæx jurisprudence denouncement and recommendations for

amendment of “Parties to the Conflict” and “Prisoner of War” definitions, respectively to “Scarcity Combatant Parties to the Conflict” and “Political Prisoner of Sex and War”; as detailed in Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War3, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950; in terms of Article 1424 and 1435 [Signatories6].

http://www.admin.ch/br/org/index.html?lang=en (info@bk.admin.ch) http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/INTRO/305?OpenDocument 3 http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/INTRO/305?OpenDocument 4 Article 142: Each of the High Contracting Parties shall be at liberty to denounce the present Convention. The denunciation shall be notified in writing to the Swiss Federal Council, which shall transmit it to the Governments of all the High Contracting Parties. The denunciation shall take effect one year after the notification thereof has been 1 2


[1.2]

The general argument of this submission argues on behalf of the

Ecological Overshoot Scarcity Conflict Sustainable Security Military Necessity that all Eco and Ego logically Illiterate International Treaty’s addressing war or peace issues, which do not address the underlying ecological overshoot and civilized patriarchy root causes of conflict; should be deemed fraudulent and hence null and void; or appropriately amended. [1.3] A.

Recommendations Overview: Disclose the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS, as a ‘Shock & Awe’ Wake Up Call to World’s Breeding War Citizens of the relationship between Sex and War.

B.

Implement Shibumi-Task Force MN-737, as a Military Necessity ‘Scarcity Combatant Cheater Assassination’ Wake Up Call to Consumption War Oligarchs of the relationship between Consumption and War; to Tragedy of the Commons coercively stimulate their collective demand for the implantation of Æquilibriæx international jurisprudence.

[1.4]

The submission also raises novel ‘Masculinity, Honour, Sex and War’

questions which Applicants consider crucial for the future credibility of whether the legacy of Western Civilisation's Anthropocentric conceptualization of the rule of law and principles of legality will culminate in (a) the mob 'rule of men' insistence to perpetuate the Masculine Insecurity Control of Reproduction and Consumption Human Farming7 War Economy Legal Matrix; or (b) the 'rule of law' courage to confront ecological literacy – Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project8 (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) which argues – like ecology – that a healthy ecological environment, with due regard for maintaining consumption and procreation below carrying capacity limits is a sine qua non for all other constitutional rights – with honour, wisdom, and grace.

[For more on

made to the Swiss Federal Council. However, a denunciation of which notification has been made at a time when the denouncing Power is involved in a conflict shall not take effect until peace has been concluded, and until after operations connected with the release and repatriation of the persons protected by the present Convention have been terminated. The denunciation shall have effect only in respect of the denouncing Power. It shall in no way impair the obligations which the Parties to the conflict shall remain bound to fulfil by virtue of the principles of the law of nations, as they result from the usages established among civilized peoples, from the laws of humanity and the dictates of the public conscience. 5 Article 143: The Swiss Federal Council shall register the present Convention with the Secretariat of the United Nations. The Swiss Federal Council shall also inform the Secretariat of the United Nations of all ratifications, accessions and denunciations received by it with respect to the present Convention. 6 http://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp? xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesParties&xp_treatySelected=305 7 Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement: http://youtu.be/gHAnrXCvavc 8 Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 International Legal Materials 162 206. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/92/7383.pdf

2


Civilized Patriarchy’s Indulgence Legal Matrix, see Amicus submissions to USCAAF: US v Bradley Manning9; US-VA: US v Edward Snowden10; DE-Bavaria: Germany v Beate Zschape11; UK-Old Bailey: UK v Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale12; ZA: HPCSA v Wouter Basson13; US-NY: ACLU v Clapper et al14; USCA: First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles et al v National Security Agency, et al.]

Applicants: [2]

Applicants Lara Johnstone, Nanette Derenzi; Dennis McGinn; Timothy

McVeigh; Erik Prince; Vladimir Putin; David Petraeus; Ray ODierno; Stan McChrystal and John Mulholland are applicant parties in the George Magistrates Court, South Africa: Johnstone et al v Blanton et al: Case 4643-13. Among others the case involves negotiation of the MISO 528 004, MI6GASM

project, a

Masculinity, Honour, Sex and War project to help Yuri, Alexi and Jack crashland the End of Industrial Civilization (END:CIV15), as honourably as possible. [3]

Vice Admiral Nanette M. "Nan" DeRenzi16 is the current and 42nd Judge

Advocate General (JAG) of the United States Navy. [See Declaration17 of JAG Lt. Cdr. Lara Braveheart, to US Navy Judge Advocate General: Vice Admiral Nanette Derenzi]. [4]

Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn18 served in the U.S. Navy for 35 years

culminating as Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs at the Pentagon. On 9 July 2013, Vice Admiral McGinn was nominated by President Obama to lead Navy Energy Efforts19. [See MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Whistleblower/Activist Oath (PDF20)] McGinn was member of the CNA Military Advisory Board for the 2007 CNA report titled, “National Security and the Threat of Climate Change21,” which lays out the ways in which climate change is a “threat multiplier” around the globe; and the 2009 report http://sqswans.weebly.com/us-court-of-appeals-for-armed-forces.html http://tygae.weebly.com/united-states.html 11 http://tygae.weebly.com/germany.html 12 http://tygae.weebly.com/united-kingdom.html 13 http://tygae.weebly.com/south-africa.html 14 http://tygae.weebly.com/united-states.html 15 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hx-G1uhRqA 16 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanette_M._DeRenzi 17 http://issuu.com/tygae/docs/13-08-05_jag_07-146_jag_vadm-n-dere 18 http://www.acore.org/about/governance/acore-staff/36-uncategorized-pages28/203-2vice-admiral-dennis-v-mcginnusn-ret 19 http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/07/09/2270861/president-obama-nominates-ret-admiral-mcginn-to-lead-navyenergy-efforts/ 20 http://tygae.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/13-06-18_snowden-greenwald_milintedaywhistleblowing_cert.pdf 21 http://www.cna.org/reports/climate 9

10

3


“Powering America’s Defense: Energy and the Risks to National Security 22”; which included a Military Appeal to American citizens to make sacrifices similar to those made by the American people made during World War II, by planting victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense and prudent lifestyle changes. [5]

Timothy James McVeigh (born April 23, 1968), was a military special

forces double agent, acting as an American domestic terrorist, in terms of his political handlers geopolitical military objectives to politically profit from aggravating the left/right ‘strategy of tension’ ‘sex and war’ economy. Among other accomplices, he detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, killing 168 people and injuring over 600. As instructed, McVeigh took sole responsibility, was convicted of eleven federal offenses and sentenced to death, which he was told would be faked. His faked execution occurred on June 11, 2001, at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana. He currently works for the National Security Agency (NSA). [6]

Erik Dean Prince (born June 6, 1969) is an American businessman and

former U.S. Navy SEAL, best known for founding the world's largest private military company, Blackwater USA, in 1997. He served as its CEO until 2009 and later as chairman until Blackwater Worldwide was sold in 2010 to a group of investors. Prince currently lives in the United Arab Emirates. [7]

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (born 7 October 1952) is the President of

Russia, a position he has held since 7 May 2012. He previously served as President from 2000 to 2008, and as Prime Minister of Russia from 1999 to 2000 and again from 2008 to 2012. During that last stint (2008 to 2012) he was also the Chairman of the United Russia political party. For sixteen years Putin served as an officer in the KGB, rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel before he retired to enter politics in his native Saint Petersburg in 1991. [See: Declaration of FSB Lt. Cdr. Felix Starinov Bochkareva, to Lt. General Vladimir G Kulishov, Head of Border Guard Service, Vice Director of FSB of Russia; CC: President Putin, Kremlin: FSB: Cheka Border Guards Æquilibriæx Sustainable Security Theses Ecology of Peace campaign. (PDF)] [8]

David Howell Petraeus (born November 7, 1952) is a retired American

military officer and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012. Prior to

22

http://www.cna.org/reports/energy

4


his assuming the directorship of the CIA, Petraeus was a highly decorated four-star general, serving over 37 years in the United States Army. His last assignments in the Army were as commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A) from July 4, 2010, to July 18, 2011. [See: Ecology of Peace Maria Bochkareva Leaver Peacenik One Child Oath (PDF23)] [9]

Raymond T. "Ray" Odierno (born September 8, 1954) is a United States

Army general and the 38th and current Chief of Staff of the Army. Odierno most recently commanded United States Joint Forces Command from October 2010 until its disestablishment in August 2011. He served as Commanding General, United States Forces – Iraq and its predecessor, Multi-National Force – Iraq, from September 2008 through September 2010. Prior to that, he served as Commanding General, III Corps, from May 2006 to May 2008. [10]

Stanley Allen McChrystal (born August 14, 1954) is a retired United

States Army General. His last assignment was as Commander, International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Commander, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A). He previously served as Director, Joint Staff from August 2008 to June 2009 and as Commander, Joint Special Operations Command from 2003 to 2008. McChrystal was reportedly known for saying and thinking what other military leaders were afraid to; this was one of the reasons cited for his appointment to lead all forces in Afghanistan. [11]

Lieutenant General John F. Mulholland, Jr. (born c. 1955) is the current

Deputy Commander of United States Special Operations Command. [12]

Lara

Terrorism24;

Johnstone

has

political

Malicious Damage to State

motivated

Property25:

criminal

convictions

for

and Contempt in Facie Curiae.

Her European ‘Totalitarian Agriculture Scarcity Combatant Parties to Conflict’ Progenitor citizens from France26, Germany27, Netherlands28, Norway29 and the http://sqswans.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/_12-1015_uscaaf_petition_reconsideration_rule31_mblpoath_signedcrtsvc.pdf 24 On 18 June 2002 (Phi Day and President Mbeki’s 60th birthday) she made a bomb threat to the P.W. Botha International airport in George and then turned herself into the Police, based upon the political necessity of exposing SA’s Truth and Reconciliation Fraud (particularly the relationship between overpopulation and terrorism and the media’s coverup of overpopulation-environment-terrorism connections). She was sentenced to two years correctional supervision. 25 She broke about half a dozen windows in George Women’s prison and set the prison on fire on 19 April 2003, when Prison authorities refused to recognize her hungerstrike. 26 FR: DELPORTE, Jacques & VITOUT, Sara: Jacques DELPORTE was born about 1680 near Rijswijk (Lille) in Flandre, France. Sara VITOUT was born about 1681 in Guines, Picardie, France . They married in January 1698 in Veere, Europa. His name is also spelt as La Porte. He is from Ryssel (Lille) and he marries Sara VITOUT in October 1698 and three months later, on 10 Dec. 1698 they leave the Netherlands on the ship Cattendyk, as French Huguenots. They arrive in Capetown on 13 April 1699. || FR: DE VILLIERS, Abraham & GARDIOL, Susanne: DE 23

5


United Kingdom30 travelled to South Africa as a means to escape the resource scarcity and ideological and religious conflict consequences of Totalitarian Agriculture breeding and consumption war practices; occurring in Europe at the time; as economic, religious and military cannon fodder on behalf of European VILLIERS, Abraham was born in Bar-sur-Seine, Bourgogne, France in 1659, and married Susanne GARDIOL (1668), daughter of Antoine GARDIOL and Margueritte PERROTETTE, from La Coste, Provence on 05 October 1689 in the Cape. Abraham and his two brothers Jacques (Jacob) DE VILLIERS (1661) and Pierre DE VILLIERS were from La Rochelle - although it has been argued they were originally from Bourgogne and fled to La Rochelle - were French Huguenots who left France in 1689 on the Zion. Jacob married Marguerite GARDIOL and Abraham her sister Susanna GARDIOL. Abraham and Susanne lived at Meerust, Drakenstein. Susanne GARDIOL arrived at the Cape in January 1689, with her mother and sister Margueritte and brother Jean on the Wapen van Alkmaar, having left Amsterdam on 18 July 1688. Susanne GARDIOL is a descendant of the GARDIOL families from Luberon; who settled in Luberon at the end of the 15th century; of the Vaud clan, who came from the alpine valleys of Piedmont (Theses of Gabriel AUDISIO, published in 1984 : "The of Vaud ones of Luberon - a minority in Provence"). || FR: DE VILLIERS, Jacques (Jacob) & GARDIOL, Marguerite: DE VILLIERS Jacques (Jacob) was born approximately 1661 at La Rochelle, where they had fled to from Burgundy. In 1689 he and his brothers Abraham and Pierre arrived in the Cape on Zion. Jacob married Marguerite GARDIOL, from Provence. He established himself at La Brie, Franschoek, and later Boschendal. || FR: JACOBS, Pierre & DE VOS, Susanna: JACOBS, Pierre from Calais was a French Huguenot who arrived in the Cape in 1688 on De Schelde wit his wife Suzanna DE VOS, and three children, Daniel, Sara and Suzanne. They settled on De Goede Hoop (1688), Groot Drakenstein. He died in 1693. || FR: MARE, Ignace & VAN VUUREN, Susanna: Ignace Mare was born about 1684 in Calabria France; although some sources allege otherwise. It is alleged he was christened in Ardennes, Montherme, France in 1686; and that he was the second son of Paul Mare, some also consider him a possible Huguenot. On 07 February 1706, in Drakenstein, he married Susanna van Vuuren (born 1691) in Calais, France. Susanna was the daughter of Gerrit J. van Vuuren (1660, Netherlands 1700, Cape) and Susanna Jacobs (1671, Calais France - 1696, Cape). || DE: ROOS, Johannes (Hans): ROOS Johannes (Hans) was born 10 May 1677 in Leipzig, Germany and came to South Africa from Leipzig, East Germany. He was the son of Johannes ROSE, a linen merchant and Anna BLUMEN. Johannes was a mason 1713-1715. In 1715 he became a burger and a black smith. On 19 May 1715 (some say 1714) he married Johanna VISSER who was baptised on 5 March 1690 - the daughter of Johannes VISSERr and Catharine VAN DER ZEE - an orphan from the Netherlands. Johannes and Johanna had 10 children. On 9 December 1746 Johanna married Lucas VISAGIE. She died about 1755. (de Villiers and Pama, Genealogies of old S A Families 1981) 27 DE: HAMMES, Pieter Caspar: HAMMES, Pieter Caspar -- son of Friedrich HAMMES and Anna Margaretha FALKENRATH -- was born in Remsheid, North Rhinde-Westphalia and arrived in the Cape in 1753 as a soldier. He married Maria Magdalena DELPORT on 31 July 1763 in the Cape. She was the daughter of Pieter DELPORT and Anna Elizabeth MARE (b: 04.01.1710, Drakenstein). He died on 20 May 1772 in the Cape. || 28 NL: BOSMAN Hermanus: Hermanus BOSMAN was born on 19 April 1682 in Amsterdam, and left Holland, from Texel on 20 January 1706 destined for Batavia. He did not like the Far East, so returned on the De Overryp, arriving in the Cape on 19 April 1707, where he as appointed Pastor of Drakenstein. He married Elizabeth DE VILLIERS (daughter of Abraham DE VILLIERS & Suzane GARDIOL) on 04 March 1708. They established themselves on De Nieuwe Plantatie. || NL: KOLVER, Andreas Lutgerus: KOLVER, Andreas (Andries) Lutgerus, was born in Zwolle in 1743, studied at Leiden and Jena and was ordained in 1766. He preached in Dordrecth, until 1780 when he was despatched to the Cape on the Krooswyik. In 1742, the German community in the Cape requested permission from the Dutch East Indian Company to establish their own church. The German farmer Martin Melck, from Elsenburg, donated one of his “sheds” in Strand Street as the first Lutheran Church. It was the first new denominational church allowed by the Dutch, but they were instructed to only preach in Dutch. The first service was led by Andreas on 10 December 1780. Their were 441 members, 300 Germans, the rest Dutch and Scandinavians. He married Antonia Adriana HEZELER. They had two children: Wilhelmus (1769) and Johanna Elizabeth (1786) [married Andries CRONJE in 1805] || NL: VAN VUUREN, Gerrit (Janse): Gerrit J. VAN VUUREN was born about 1660 in Vuren, Netherlands; and died in June 1700 in the Cape. He was the son of UNKNOWN, Johannes born about 1647 in Gelderland; died about 1667 in Vuren. In circa 1689, Gerrit married Susanna JACOBS (born in 1671 in Calais, France, and died in 1696 in the Cape). Susanna was the daughter of Pierre JACOBS (1643, Calais, Artois, France) and Suzanna DE VOS (1645, France). She died in October 1696. 29 NO: FURSTENBERG, Johan Pieter: Johan Pieter FÜRSTENBERG was born about 1760 in Bergen, Norway. He was an officer in the artillery and is referred to by some sources as: Johan Petrus. On 04 July 1784 he married Anna Elizabeth HAMMES (01.03.1767) in Capetown; daughter of Pieter Casper HAMMES (~1752, Drakenstein) and Maria Magdalena DELPORT (1753, Sergauts River, Swellendam). 30 UK: JOHNSTONE James Augustus: James Augustus JOHNSTONE was born circa 1810 in Edinburgh (Dumpfries), Scotland, and was an 1820 settler to Port Elizabeth. On 20 September 1837 he married Elizabeth Cornelia ROOS in Port Elizabeth, from Laings Nek in Natal (daughter of Francois ROOS, born 13/05/1791; and Maria Elisabeth FURSTENBURG, born 03/11/1805); and in 1840’s after the birth of their first son, they moved to Natal. || UK: KOLBE George Augustus & DOWNING Margaret: George Augusts KOLBE was born on 7 December 1802 in London, travelled to South Africa as an English settler, employed as a missionary doctor, settling on the farm Wurtenburg, Knopdaar, near Burgersdorp, where he died on 01 December 1844. He married Margaret Downing (descendant of Sir George Downing), born in London on 23 February 1805, who died in Burgersdorp on 25 November 1861. They had 15 children.

6


“Colonial Empire” decision-making, to find only the Bushman as indigenous natives. They arrived as “settler” farmers, soldiers, medical personnel, religious and political administrators, frequently on behalf of, and for the benefit of European Political and Financial Imperial Interests. She is the co-founder of CommonSism and Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence; and a paralegal activist on behalf of MILINT Earth Day31.

PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT: Current Definition: Parties to the Conflict: [13]

Armed Conflict is defined in How is the Term "Armed Conflict" Defined

in International Humanitarian Law?; a March 2008 Opinion Paper32 by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC); as follows: [13.1]

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

proposed a general definition of international armed conflict. In the Tadic case, the Tribunal stated that "an armed conflict exists whenever there is a resort to armed force between States".33 This definition has been adopted by other international bodies since then. [13.2]

According to D. Schindler, "the existence of an armed conflict within the

meaning of Article 2 common to the Geneva Conventions can always be assumed when parts of the armed forces of two States clash with each other. […] Any kind of use of arms between two States brings the Conventions into effect"34. [13.3]

H.-P. Gasser explains that "any use of armed force by one State against the

territory of another, triggers the applicability of the Geneva Conventions between the two States. […] It is also of no concern whether or not the party attacked resists. […] As soon as the armed forces of one State find themselves with wounded or surrendering members of the armed forces or civilians of another State on their hands, as soon as they detain prisoners or have actual control over a part of the territory of the enemy State, then they must comply with the relevant convention"35.

http://tygae.weebly.com/ https://www.ohrd.wisc.edu/home/HideATab/FullyPreparedtoManage/ ConflictResolution/AboutConflict/Definitions/tabid/226/Default.aspx 33 ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995, para. 70. 34 D. Schindler, The different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols, RCADI, Vol. 163, 1979-II, p. 131. 35 H.P. Gasser, International Humanitarian Law: an Introduction, in: Humanity for All: the International 31 32

7


[13.4]

The German Joint Services Regulations (ZDv) 15/2 says that "an

international armed conflict exists if one party uses force of arms against another party. […] The use of military force by individual persons or groups of persons will not suffice"36. [13.5]

According to E. David, "tout affrontement armé entre forces des Etats

parties aux CG de 1949 (et éventuellement au 1er PA de 1977) relève de ces instruments, quelle que soit l'ampleur de cet affrontement: une escarmouche, un incident de frontière entre les forces armées des Parties suffisent à provoquer l'application des Conventions (et du 1er Protocole, s'il lie les Etats) à cette situation"37. [13.6]

Additionally Judgments and decisions of the ICTY also shed some light on

the definition of Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC). As mentioned above, the ICTY went on to determine the existence of a NIAC "whenever there is […] protracted armed violence between governmental authorities and organised armed groups or between such groups within a State".38 The ICTY thus confirmed that the definition of NIAC in the sense of common Article 3 encompasses situations where "several factions [confront] each other without involvement of the government's armed forces"39. Since that first ruling, each judgment of the ICTY has taken this definition as a starting point. [14]

The ICRC proposes the following definitions which reflect the strong

prevailing legal opinion: [14.1]

International armed conflicts exist whenever there is resort to armed force

between two or more States. [14.2]

Non-international armed conflicts are protracted armed confrontations

occurring between governmental armed forces and the forces of one or more armed groups, or between such groups arising on the territory of a State [party to the Geneva Conventions]. The armed confrontation must reach a minimum level of intensity and the parties involved in the conflict must show a minimum of organisation.

Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, H. Haug (ed.), Paul Haupt Publishers, Berne, 1993, p. 510-511. 36 D. Fleck, The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995, p. 40. 37 E. David, Principes de droit des conflits armés, ULB, Bruxelles, 2002, p. 109. 38 ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995, para.70. 39 Y. Sandoz/C.Swinarski/B. Zimmermann, Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, ICRC, Geneva, 1987, para. 4461.

8


[15]

As noted none of the ICRC’s aforementioned definitions of ‘armed conflict’ or

‘non-international armed conflict’, and hence ‘parties to the conflict’ address the root causes of armed conflict; hence the parties directly responsible for the cocreation of the resource scarcity or other political or human nature conditions, the result of which is the particular form of ‘armed conflict’. Suggested Definitions: [16] [16.1]

Breeding/Consumption Scarcity Combatant Parties to the Conflict: Any individual, organisation or nation whose procreation or consumption

footprint violates its commons carrying capacity limits; should be designated as a ‘breeding/consumption’ scarcity combatant party to any local, regional, national or international resource scarcity related conflict. [17] [17.1]

Breeding/Consumption Weapons of War: “We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the

penis, the womb, and the ego. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population and consumption, to below carrying capacity limits; by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis, etc.; you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population; or using the ego to consume in violation of carrying capacity limits; an Act of War” – Amended version of quote by Judge Jason G. Brent, in Humans: An Endangered Species. [18] [18.1]

Biological Warfare: Biological Warfare is simply a symptom of breeding and consumption

biological behaviours. The most dangerous root cause biological warfare ingredients are (a) male sperm; (b) female ovaries; and (c) ego-gender insecurity memeplexes that have hijacked our brain-matter/minds; to engage in breeding war and consumption warfare behaviour; resulting in ecological overshot, standing armies and finally military biological warfare. [19] [19.1]

Chemical Warfare: Chemical Warfare is simply a symptom of breeding and consumption

chemical behaviours. The most dangerous root cause chemical warfare ingredients are (a) male sperm; (b) female ovaries; and (c) ego-gender insecurity memeplexes that have hijacked our brain-matter/minds; to engage in breeding war and

9


consumption warfare behaviour; resulting in ecological overshot, standing armies and finally military chemical warfare. [20] [20.1]

Fraud of UN ‘Peace’ and ‘War’ Treaties: Any United Nations endorsed international treaty related to ‘war’ or

‘peace’ that ignores specifically addressing the breeding war and consumption war violation of carrying capacity limits root causes of ecological overshoot, which subsequently manifests as cannon fodder standing armies and their creation of military chemical, biological, technological, electronic and other related warfare ingredients, is based upon deception and fraud. MILINT Ecology of Peace Guerrylla Lawfare Laws: Breeding/Consumption Scarcity Combatant Parties to the Conflict: [21]

Guerrylla Laws define the Eco/Ego Footprint40 procreation and consumption

behaviour of an individual as a Sustainable Leaver (aka Eco-Innocent) or Unsustainable Taker (aka Scarcity-Combatant), based upon a sustainable consumption bio-capacity of 1 global hectare (gha)41 (60 % of 1.8 gha)42 in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan43; multiplied by an individuals procreation footprint factor of 20 per child. [(Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 2044)] [22]

For example: Applicant’s Consumption Footprint45 using Sustainable

Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 12.75 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. Applicant has no children, consequently her procreation factor is 0 x 20* = 0. Her Consumption (12.75) x EcoFootprint: The difference between the biocapacity and Ecological Footprint of a region or country. A biocapacity deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to that population. If there is a regional or national biocapacity deficit, it means that the region is importing biocapacity through trade or liquidating regional ecological assets. Global biocapacity deficit cannot be compensated through trade, and is overshoot. 41 Sustainable Footprint Biocapacity: A biocapacity of 1 gha assumes that 40% of land is set aside for other species. 1 gha is 60 % of 1.8 gha, therefore .8 hectares is set aside for other species. 42 International Biocapacity: In 2006, the average biologically productive area (biocapacity) per person worldwide was approximately 1.8 global hectares (gha) per capita. In 2008, there were ~ 12 billion hectares of biologically productive land and water on Earth. Dividing by the number of people alive in that year (6.7 billion) gives 1.79 global hectares per person. This assumes that no land is set aside for other species that consume the same biological material as humans. 43 Bhutan Proactive Conservation: Bhutan is seen as a model for proactive conservation initiatives. The Kingdom has received international acclaim for its commitment to the maintenance of its biodiversity. This is reflected in the decision to maintain at least sixty percent of the land area under forest cover, to designate more than 40% of its territory as national parks, reserves and other protected areas, and most recently to identify a further nine percent of land area as biodiversity corridors linking the protected areas. Environmental conservation has been placed at the core of the nation's development strategy, the middle path. It is not treated as a sector but rather as a set of concerns that must be mainstreamed in Bhutan's overall approach to development planning and to be buttressed by the force of law. - "Parks of Bhutan". Bhutan Trust Fund for Environmental Conservation online. Bhutan Trust Fund. 44 Paul Murtaugh (7-31-09): Family Planning: A Major Environmental Emphasis, Oregon University http://sqswans.weebly.com/child--ecofootprint-x-20.html 45 http://myfootprint.org/en/your_results/?id=2559685

40

10


Procreation (0) = Eco Footprint of 12.75/0 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Applicant, we would need 0.81 earths.46 Conversely, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Jacob Zuma, we would need 2090 earths47. [23]

Ecology of Peace Status on Planet of 7 billion:

Consumption below cultural carrying capacity limits:

Procreation and

(a) Zero children,

consumption footprint < 20 gha; (b) 1 child, consumption footprint < 1 gha. [24]

Scarcity – Combatant Status on Planet of 7 billion: Procreation and/or

Consumption above cultural carrying capacity limits: (a) Zero children, with consumption footprint above 20 gha; (b) One child, with consumption footprint above 1 gha; (c) Two or more children. [25]

Planet of 1 Billion: Ecology of Peace status of 1 child is 12 gha: If for

example, there were only 3.5 billion people alive this year, that would have provided everyone with one child, with 3.5 gha (instead of 1 gha), and no children with 3.5 gha x 20 = 60.5 gha. If there were only 1 billion people, every person with one child would have access to 12 gha biocapacity for their needs, without transgressing carrying capacity limits, and entering into ecological overshoot. Note: The above statistics are also based upon using only 60 percent of biologically productive land of 12 billion hectares / population; meaning that 40 percent of biologically productive land is returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes.

PRISONER OF WAR: [26]

Current Definition: Prisoner of War:

[27]

Article Four of Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of

War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 195048; defines Prisoners of War as follows:

http://sqworms.weebly.com/lara-johnstone-eco-081.html President Zuma’s consumption footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global hectares (gha). President Zuma’s Procreation Factor is 500 [President Zuma has 25 children. His procreation footprint factor is 25 x 20* = 500. (Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20)]. President Zuma’s Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint is 33280 gha [Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (500) = Net Footprint of 33280 gha]. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Zuma, we would need 2,090 earths. http://sqworms.weebly.com/jacob-zuma-ego-2090.html 48 http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/y3gctpw.htm 46 47

11


A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the power of the enemy: 1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces. 2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions: (a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates; (b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance; (c) That of carrying arms openly; (d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war. 3. Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power. 4. Persons who accompany the armed forces without actually being members thereof, such as civilian members of military aircraft crews, war correspondents, supply contractors, members of labour units or of services responsible for the welfare of the armed forces, provided that they have received authorization from the armed forces which they accompany, who shall provide them for that purpose with an identity card similar to the annexed model. 5. Members of crews, including masters, pilots and apprentices, of the merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law. 6. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war. B. The following shall likewise be treated as prisoners of war under the present Convention: 1. Persons belonging, or having belonged, to the armed forces of the occupied country, if the occupying Power considers it necessary by reason of such allegiance to intern them, even though it has originally liberated them while hostilities were

12


going on outside the territory it occupies, in particular where such persons have made an unsuccessful attempt to rejoin the armed forces to which they belong and which are engaged in combat, or where they fail to comply with a summons made to them with a view to internment. 2. The persons belonging to one of the categories enumerated in the present Article, who have been received by neutral or nonbelligerent Powers on their territory and whom these Powers are required to intern under international law, without prejudice to any more favourable treatment which these Powers may choose to give and with the exception of Articles 8, 10, 15, 30, fifth paragraph, 58-67, 92, 126 and, where diplomatic relations exist between the Parties to the conflict and the neutral or nonbelligerent Power concerned, those Articles concerning the Protecting Power. Where such diplomatic relations exist, the Parties to a conflict on whom these persons depend shall be allowed to perform towards them the functions of a Protecting Power as provided in the present Convention, without prejudice to the functions which these Parties normally exercise in conformity with diplomatic and consular usage and treaties.

[28]

Suggested Terminology: Military and Political Prisoners of Sex and

War: [29]

Applicants suggest that (a) the terminology be changed to “Military and

Political Prisoners of Sex and War”; (b) the aforementioned individuals status be amended to ‘Military Prisoners of Sex and War’; and (c) that generally considered ‘Political Prisoners’ (individuals convicted of criminal offences, who claimed their criminal acts were subjectively politically motivated) also be granted the status of ‘Political Prisoners of Sex and War’.

Recommendations for abolishing Commons Cheating ‘rule of men’ jurisprudence and implementing Ecological Carrying Capacity ‘rule of law’ jurisprudence. [30]

Elimination of the ‘underlying essential breeding and consumption

war causes and elements of armed conflict’: [30.1]

A community practising ‘commons cheating’ hoping to move to ‘commons

conservation’ would need to (a) reward the Eco-Innocents to maintain their EcoInnocent status; and (b) identify the Scarcity Combatant Cheaters who may

13


voluntarily agree to work towards amending their status to Eco-Innocents, to encourage their Ecologically Literate Awakening. [31]

Extensive Environment/Overshoot-Scarcity-Conflict documentation from

military and intelligence agencies, united nations and governments, NGO’s and academic reports, etc, collectively document how legislative failure to restrict humanity’s procreation and consumption to cultural carrying capacity limits, and Legal Matrix Indulgences to Corporations: Socialized Corporate Externality Costs: Trillion Dollar Thefts from Global Natural Capital Commons49, has resulted in humanity’s ecological overshoot of carrying capacity limits by between 700 to 400,000 percent50; which include crossing urgent Planetary Boundary Tipping Points51: (i) Loss of Biodiversity and Species Extinctions52; (ii) Climate Change53; (iii) Nitrogen Cycle54; (iv) Ocean Acidification55; (v) Changes in Land Use56; (vi) Global Freshwater Use57; (vii) State Shift in the Earth’s Biosphere58; (viii) Peak Non-Renewable Natural Resources: Scarcity59; with devastating current climateresource-scarcity-conflict

and

refugees,

and

impending

threat

multiplier

aggravation of crisis of ‘scarcity-conflict’ death spiral consequences. [32]

Obstacles to mitigating Ecological, Economic and Climate Collapse; and

possible or definite Near Term Extinction include an absence of ecologically literate citizens to demand national constitutional and international law social contract jurisprudence, in support of the Ecology of Peace commandment: “Thou shalt not legislate, enforce or obey any law which enables citizens procreation or consumption to transgress cultural carrying capacity limits”; or (b) provide clear, rational, impartial, fair and equitable justifications for violating the ecological commandment. [33] [33.1]

In Your Face Eco and Egological Citizen Referendum: The term ‘In Your Face’ is derived from the From the Wilderness “In your

Face’60 article which explains among other things: (a) The reasons why activists of

http://tygae.weebly.com/corp-externalities.html http://tygae.weebly.com/ecological-overshoot.html 51 http://tygae.weebly.com/tipping-points.html 52 http://tygae.weebly.com/biodiversity-loss.html 53 http://tygae.weebly.com/climate-change.html 54 http://tygae.weebly.com/nitrogen-cycle.html 55 http://tygae.weebly.com/ocean-acidification.html 56 http://tygae.weebly.com/land-use.html 57 http://tygae.weebly.com/freshwater-use.html 58 http://tygae.weebly.com/biosphere-state-shift.html 59 http://tygae.weebly.com/peak-nnr-scarcity.html 60 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/013004_in_your_face.html 49 50

14


all stripes are generally ineffective; and (b) the lessons to be learnt from the movie Three Days of the Condor; culminating with the question: “What do you want?” [33.2]

The term ‘Honourable’ refers to avoiding Bullshit the public relations [i.e

the manipulation of the public using seething Energies of Lucifer PC61 aka Zionist divide and conquer PR62] in terms of dialogue with the citizen/subject public and instead confronting them with the harsh reality of either (a) voluntarily, humanely and non-violently reducing their consumption and procreation to carrying capacity limits and supporting legislation to such effect; or (b) experiencing the coercive, resource war divide and conquer race, culture and religious resource war violence that shall result from the failure to voluntarily internationally reduce population and consumption. [33.3]

Recommendations: Honourable ‘In Your Face’ Public Population and

Consumption Reduction Campaigns.

Honourable ‘In Your Face’ Public Population Reduction: Disclose the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS, as a ‘Shock & Awe’ Wake Up Call to World’s Breeding War Citizens of the relationship between Sex and War. [34]

The EOPGASM JAG Ecology of Peace Invitation Proposal to disclose the

Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS, as a ‘Shock and Awe’ Wake Up Call to World Citizens of the relationship between Sex and War; including to the most obtuse and ignorant, to provide stimulation and opportunity for an International Public Discourse Debate about implementing the Ecology of Peace commandment into International Law; in support of preventing Ecological Collapse and possible Near Term Extinction and/or the Tragedy of the Common’s Nuclear War. [35]

Brief overview of origins of AIDS:

“Birth Rates Must Come Down More Quickly Or Current Death Rates Must Go Up. There Is No Other Way.” -- Robert McNamara, Worldbank President, 1970; previously Secretary of Defence from 1961 to 196863

http://sqswans-prh.blogspot.com/2013/12/racism-is-white-supremacy-home-of.html http://www.facebook.com/notes/lara-zhivago/wanna-discuss-zionismzionists-or-racismracists-please-provide-yourdefinition-of/10151133308889507 63 Sutton (1993/12) 61

62

15


[36]

In July 1969 Dr. MacArthur, Director of the U.S. Army Advanced Research

Project Agency (ARPA) appeared before Congress, stating that “within a period of 5-10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.”64 [37]

According to Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Dr. John Martin, a Professor of

Pathology at the University of Southern California, & the Director of the Center for Complex Infectious Diseases, former director of the Viral Oncology Branch of the FDA's Bureau of Biologics, the government's principal human vaccines agency, this “synthetic biological agent” is AIDS, created with $10 million, as required65. [38]

Dr. MacArthur added that “it is a highly controversial issue and there are

many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to another method of massive killing of large populations.”66 [39]

On October 2, 1970, 15 months after Dr. MacArthur requested an

appropriation for AIDS development, Robert McNamara, now World Bank President, made a speech to international bankers in which he identified population growth as “the gravest issue that the world faces over the years ahead,” arguing that population growth was leading to instability, that a 10 billion world population would not be “controllable.”67 [40]

McNamara predicted that “it is not a world that any of us would want to live

in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.”68 [41]

Dr. Horowitz‘s book “Emerging Viruses” explores the geopolitical background

prior to the appearance of AIDS, and reviews the vaccines studies conducted in New York City and Central West Africa, by the Special Virus program, under the auspices of the National Cancer Institute and the World Health Organisation. Experiments such as the Merck contract suggesting an Iatrogenic origin of AIDS, where Feline Leukema/Sarcoma, Herpes virus, and Monkey cancer viruses were

Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970 Horowitz (1999) 66 Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970 67 Sutton (1993/12) 68 Sutton (1993/12) 64

65

16


being combined, which led to the Pilot Hepatitus B Vaccines 69 partially prepared in Chimpanzees, given to gay men in New York City and African Blacks by 197570. [42]

Special Virus Cancer Program documentation includes a flow chart, which

links all the 20,000 scientific papers, proving a “candidate” virus was developed and mass produced,71 and the USUSSR agreement under which Biological Weapons including the most advanced cancer viruses were traded during the Cold War72, in terms of “A Memorandum of Understanding for cooperation in the study of microbiology, immunology, and molecular biology of cancer viruses was first signed on November 18, 1972,” which “established procedures for joint studies through the exchange of information, materials and scientists between the two countries.” A partial list of US and USSR researchers, including Dr. Robert Gallo (the discoverer of AIDS) of the NCI, traded the most advanced methods and materials in field of molecular biology, bacteriology & virology during the Cold War, including “large scale production of human virus”. [43]

In Merck vaccine scientist Dr. Maurice Hilleman admitted presence of SV40,

AIDS and cancer viruses in vaccines, Mike Adams writes that “One of the most prominent vaccine scientists in the history of the vaccine industry -- a Merck scientist -- made a recording where he openly admits that vaccines given to Americans were contaminated with leukemia and cancer viruses. In response, his colleagues (who are also recorded here) break out into laughter and seem to think it's hilarious. They then suggest that because these vaccines are first tested in Russia, they will help the U.S. win the Olympics because the Russian athletes will all be “loaded down with tumors.” (Thus, they knew these vaccines caused cancer in humans.) This isn't some conspiracy theory -- these are the words of a top Merck scientist who probably … thought this would remain a secret forever. When asked why this didn't get out to the press, he replied “Obviously you don't go out, this is a scientific affair within the scientific community.””

Honourable ‘In Your Face’ Public Consumption Reduction: Implement Shibumi-Task Force MN-737, as a Military Necessity ‘Scarcity Combatant Cheater Assassination’ Wake Up Call to Consumption War Horowitz (2001) p.270: “Combine these two diseases – feline leukemia and hepatitis – and you have the immune deficiency” syndrome today called AIDS, said CDC hepatitis B chief Dr. Don Francis at the onset of the AIDS epidemic. 70 NIH Contract No: NIH-71-2059: Merck & Company, Inc. Project Director: Dr. Maurice Hilleman 71 National Inst. of Health: Progress Report # 9 (Fold In Chart) 72 Page 36-39; U.S. Special Virus Program, Progress Report # 15, June 1978, (417pp) 69

17


Oligarchs of the relationship between Consumption and War; to Tragedy of the Commons coercively stimulate their collective demand for the implantation of Æquilibriæx international jurisprudence. [44]

It is suggested that more than a few international oligarchs would embrace

the opportunity to voluntarily (a) follow the path of Douglas and Kristine Tompkins73, who are investing all their wealth into transforming the economy to a sustainable low tech agrarian economy74; and/or (b) massively reduce their consumption aiming towards carrying capacity limits; (c) if Æquilibriæx jurisprudence limiting procreation and consumption of all the worlds citizens; was internationally implemented. [45]

In the absence of international implementation of Æquilibriæx jurisprudence

limiting procreation and consumption of all the worlds citizens to carrying capacity limits; they have no incentive to reduce their wealth thereby exposing themselves and their families, and their countries, to the harsher consequences of humanity’s failure to prevent global Ecological, Economic and Climate Collapse, and possible or definite near term extinction. [46]

To the contrary, they would probably use their wealth, not to mention their

divide and conquer public relations skills, to massively reduce population using their tried and tested divide and conquer race, class and religious resource war skills; hoping to be amongst the survivors. [47]

Suggested Shibumi-Task Force MN-737 actions:

[47.1]

Contact oligarchs to determine their commitment to the implementation of

international Æquilibriæx jurisprudence. [47.2]

Commitment equating to said oligarch’s family donating ten percent of

their wealth to an Æquilibriæx jurisprudence trust fund, setup for the implementation of Æquilibriæx jurisprudence internationally or nationally (as appropriate, transparently audited). [47.3]

Any oligarch’s family who refuses to commit to the implementation of

international Æquilibriæx jurisprudence; should be provided the opportunity to argue how and why they refuse; and whether their refusal justifies their exclusion from military necessity requirements to implement an orderly humane program of population and consumption reduction to prevent global Ecological, Economic and Climate Collapse, and possible or definite near term extinction.

73 74

http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/technology-stopped-evolution-destroying-world http://www.tompkinsconservation.org/dvd_the_next_economy.htm?iframe=true&width=480&height=360

18


[47.4]

If the oligarch’s family’s objections do not justify their exclusion from the

implementation of international Æquilibriæx jurisprudence; they should be notified that two members of their oligarch family shall be assassinated every two weeks; until the family changes their mind.

Sustainable Security: A Military Necessity [48]

Military Necessity Doctrine:

[49] As argued in the military necessity related application currently before the European Court of Human Rights, in the matter of Johnstone v. Kingdom of Norway; dealing with the Oslo District Courts irregular denial to Anders Breivik of a subjective and objective enquiry into his Military Necessity Defence evidence: [49.1]

Necessity Defence: International and Foreign Law:

A.

The rationale of the necessity defense is not that a person, when faced with the pressure of circumstances of nature, lacks the mental element which the crime in question requires. Rather, it is this reason of public policy: the law ought to promote the achievement of higher values at the expense of lesser values, and sometimes the greater good for society will be accomplished by violating the literal language of the criminal law.75

B.

The principle of the necessity defence is rooted in common law and any accused pleading to necessity argues that their actions were justified or an exculpation for breaking the law. Defendants who plead to necessity – whether common law necessity, political necessity (civil disobedience) or military necessity - argue that they should not be held liable for their actions as being criminal, because their conduct was necessary to prevent some greater harm.

[49.2] As argued in The Necessity Defense in Civil Disobedience Cases: Bring in the Jury, by William P. Quigley:

75 76

A.

[..] The doctrine of necessity, with its inevitable weighing of choices of evil, holds that certain conduct, though it violates the law and produces harm, is justified because it averts a greater evil and hence produces a net social gain or benefit to society.76

B.

Glanville Williams expressed the necessity doctrine this way: “[S]ome acts that would otherwise be wrong are rendered rightful by a good purpose, or

WAYNE R. LAFAVE, CRIMINAL LAW, § 5.4, at 477 (3d ed. 2000). See Joseph J. Simeone, “Survivors” of the Eternal Sea: A Short True Story, 45 ST. LOUIS U. L.J. 1123, 1141 (2001).

19


by the necessity of choosing the lesser of two evils.”77 He offers this example: “Suppose that a dike threatens to give way, and the actor is faced with the choice of either making a breach in the dike, which he knows will result in one or two people being drowned, or doing nothing, in which case he knows that the dike will burst at another point involving a whole town in sudden destruction. In such a situation, where there is an unhappy choice between the destruction of one life and the destruction of many, utilitarian philosophy would certainly justify the actor in preferring the lesser evil.”78 C.

In Nuclear War, Citizen Intervention, and the Necessity Defense79, Robert Aldridge and Virginia Stark, document numerous cases of Common Law and Civil Disobedience Necessity Defence Cases which resulted in Innocence verdicts or severe Mitigation of Sentencing.

[49.3] Common Law Necessity Defence Cases Resulting in Innocence Verdicts or Severe Mitigation of Sentencing: A.

In Regina v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273, three crew members and a cabin boy escaped a shipwreck to spend eighteen days on a boat, over 1,000 miles from land, with no water and only two one pound tins of turnips. After four days, they caught and ate a small turtle. That was the only food that they had eaten prior to the twentieth day of being lost at sea. Ultimately, two of the crew members killed the ailing cabin boy and “fed upon the body and blood of the boy for four days.” Four days later, they were rescued. Two of the men were charged with murder. The court found that the cabin boy would likely have died by the time they were rescued and that the crew members, but for their conduct, would probably have died as well. The Queen's Bench Division Judges held that the defendants were guilty of murder in killing the cabin boy and stated that their obvious necessity was no defence. The defendants were sentenced to death, but this was subsequently commuted to six months' imprisonment.

B.

In Spakes v. State, 913 S.W.2d 597 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), the Texas Criminal Appeals Court allowed the jury to be instructed on the necessity defense before deliberating the verdict for an inmate whose three cellmates had planned an escape and threatened to slit his throat if he did not accompany them. The defendant inmate argued that because of the terribly violent crimes of which his cellmates had been convicted (one had bragged about chopping his girlfriend up with an ax), it was a necessity that he break the law, by accompanying them in their escape.

GLANVILLE WILLIAMS, THE SANCTITY OF LIFE AND THE CRIMINAL LAW 198 (1957). Glanvill Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law 198 (1957). At 199-200 79 http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1887&context=lawreview

77 78

20


C.

In United States v. Ashton, 24 F. Cas. 873, 873-74 (C.C.D. Mass 1834) (No. 14,470), sailors prosecuted for mutiny were found not guilty, after arguing the necessity for their mutiny based upon the dangerously leaky ship and that this danger had been concealed from them until after they left port. Circuit Justice Story found them not guilty of mutiny.

D.

In United States v. Holmes, 26 F. Cas. 360 (E.D. Pa. 1842) (No. 15,383), Holmes was involved in a shipwreck, where the crew were charged with manslaughter for throwing sixteen passengers overboard in a frantic attempt to lighten a sinking lifeboat. The Prosecutor argued the passengers should be protected at all costs, whereas the Defence placed the jurors in the sinking lifeboat with the defendant. The Defendant was found guilty, but the jurors requested leniency, to which the court complied by sentencing the defendant to six months in prison and a fine of twenty dollars.

E.

In the 1919 Arizona decision of State v. Wooten, commonly referred to as the Bisbee Deportation case, Professor Morris80 describes the acquittal of a Sherrif based upon the “necessity” for committing Kidnapping.

F.

In Surocco v. Geary, 3 Cal. 69 (1853), a large fire threatened the unburned half of the then small town of San Francisco. A public officer ordered the destruction of houses to create a firebreak and was subsequently sued by one of the owners. On appeal, the California Supreme Court held that the action was proper because: “The right to destroy property, to prevent the spread of a conflagration, has been traced to the highest law of necessity, and the natural rights of man, independent of society and the civil government. "It is referred by moralists and jurists as the same great principle which justifies the exclusive appropriation of a plank in a shipwreck, though the life of another be sacrificed; with the throwing overboard goods in a tempest, for the safety of the vessel; with the trespassing upon the lands of another, to escape death by an enemy. It rests upon the maxim, Necessitas inducit privilegium quod jura private." [Necessity leads to privileges because of private justice].”

[49.4] Civil Disobedience Political Necessity Defence Cases Resulting in Innocence Verdicts or Severe Mitigation of Sentencing: A.

In the United States, 23 cases of left wing/liberal political protestors necessity defence cases have resulted in innocence or severe mitigation of sentencing, whereas only 1 case of right wing/conservative political protestors cases have resulted in innocence or severe mitigation of sentencing.

Norval Morris, The Verswami Story, 52 U. CHI. L. REV. 948, 989 (1985); see also The Law of Necessity as Applied in the Bisbee Deportation Case.

80

21


B.

Left Wing/Liberal: Anti Nuclear (10): State v. Mouer (Columbia Co. Dist. Ct., Dec. 12-16, 1977), People v. Brown (Lake County, Jan. 1979); People v. Block (Galt Judicial Dist., Sacramento Co. Mun. Ct., Aug. 14, 1979); California v. Lemnitzer, No. 27106E (Pleasanton-Livermore Mun. Ct. Feb. 1, 1982); State v. McMillan, No. D 00518 (San Luis Obispo Jud. Dist. Mun. Ct., Cal. Oct. 13, 1987); Massachusetts v. Schaeffer-Duffy (Worcester Dist. Ct. 1989); West Valley City v. Hirshi, No. 891003031-3 MC (Salt Lake County, Ut. Cir. Ct., W. Valley Dept. 1990); Washington v. Brown, No. 851295N (Kitsap County Dist. Ct. N. 1985); California v. Jerome, Nos. 5450895, 5451038, 5516177, 5516159 (Livermore-Pleasanton Mun. Ct., Alameda County, Traffic Div. 1987); Washington v. Karon, No. J85-113639 (Benton County Dist. Ct. 1985)

C.

Left Wing/Liberal: Anti US Central American Foreign Policy (3); Vermont v. Keller, No. 1372-4-84-CNCR (Vt. Dist. Ct. Nov. 17, 1984); People v. Jarka, Nos. 002170, 002196-002212, 00214, 00236, 00238 (Ill. Cir. Ct. Apr. 15, 1985); Colorado v. Bock (Denver County Ct. June 12, 1985)

D.

Left Wing/Liberal: Anti-Military Industrial Complex (4): Michigan v. Jones et al., Nos. 83-101194-101228 (Oakland County Dist. Ct. 1984); Michigan v. Largrou, Nos. 85-000098, 99, 100, 102 (Oakland County Dist. Ct. 1985); Massachusetts v. Carter, No. 86-45 CR 7475 (Hampshire Dist. Ct. 1987); Illinois v. Fish (Skokie Cir. Ct. Aug. 1987)

E.

Left Wing/Liberal: Anti-Apartheid (3): Chicago v. Streeter, Nos. 85-108644, 48, 49, 51, 52, 120323, 26, 27 (Cir. Ct., Cook County Ill. May 1985); Washington v. Heller (Seattle Mun. Ct. 1985); Washington v. Bass, Nos. 4750-038, -395 to -400 (Thurston County Dist. Ct. April 8, 1987)

F.

Left Wing/Liberal: Pro-Environment/Cycling (1): People v. Gray, 571 N.Y.S.2d 851, 861-62 (N.Y. Crim. Ct.1991)

G.

Left Wing/Liberal: AIDS: Clean Needles Campaign (2) California v. Halem, No. 135842 (Berkeley Mun. Ct. 1991); In 1993, a jury acquitted a Chicago AIDS activist charged with illegally supplying clean needles because of the necessity defense.81

H.

Right Wing/Conservative: Anti-Abortion (1): In 1990, in Omaha, Nebraska, a jury acquitted seventeen anti-abortion protestors because of the necessity defense. The trial judge relied on the defense to overturn the trespassing convictions of an additional eighteen defendants. 82

Andrew Fegelman, AIDS Activist Found Innocent of Charges in Needle Exchange, CHI. TRIB., Jan. 28, 1993, at 4. Judge Says Actions of Anti-abortionists at Clinic Justified, OMAHA WORLD-HERALD, July 17, 1990. In a seventeen-page order discussing necessity and the priority of life over property rights, District Judge Robert Burkard reversed the convictions for trespassing. An additional seventeen abortion protestors were acquitted by a jury on similar grounds in June 2000.

81

82

22


I.

Neutral: Anti-Corruption (1): In 1988, a North Carolina court acquitted two Tuscarora Indians of charges in connection with their taking of twenty hostages at the office of a local newspaper to protest the alleged corruption of county officials.83

J.

Neutral: Anti-Alcohol Advertising (1): In 1991, a Chicago jury acquitted a Catholic priest of criminal charges for damage to the inner-city neighborhood where he was pastor after he admitted painting over three tobacco- and alcohol-related billboards. The defendant argued he should not be convicted because of the necessity defense. The jury deliberated ninety minutes before acquitting the defendant.84

[49.5]

Military Necessity and International Humanitarian Law:

A.

Crimes of War85 and Diakona86 define military necessity as: “a legal concept used in international humanitarian law (IHL) as part of the legal justification for attacks on legitimate military targets that may have adverse, even terrible, consequences for civilians and civilian objects. It means that military forces in planning military actions are permitted to take into account the practical requirements of a military situation at any given moment and the imperatives of winning. The concept of military necessity acknowledges that even under the laws of war, winning the war or battle is a legitimate consideration, though it must be put alongside other considerations of IHL.”

B.

Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Chief Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, investigated allegations of War Crimes during the 2003 invasion of Iraq and published an open letter87 containing his findings. In a section titled "Allegations concerning War Crimes" he did not call it military necessity but summed up the term: “Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives, even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur. A crime occurs if there is an intentional attack directed against civilians (principle of distinction) (Article 8(2)(b)(i)) or an attack is launched on a military objective in the knowledge that the incidental civilian injuries would be clearly excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage (principle of proportionality) (Article 8(2)(b)(iv).”

Two Carolina Indians Acquitted in Hostage Taking, N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 15, 1988, at 9. Terry Wilson, Acquittal Answers Pfleger‘s Prayers, CHI. TRIB., July 3, 1991, at 3. 85 http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/military-necessity/ 86 http://www.diakonia.se/sa/node.asp?node=888 87 http://www2.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/F596D08D-D810-43A2-99BBB899B9C5BCD2/277422/OTP_letter_to_senders_re_Iraq_9_February_2006.pdf

83 84

23


[49.6] A.

[49.7]

88 89

Military Necessity Justifies use of Nuclear Weapons for Self-Preservation: In the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of 8 July 1996, on The legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons88, the final paragraph states “that such threat or use would generally be contrary to international humanitarian law. The opinion went on to state, however, that the court “cannot lose sight of the fundamental right of every State to survival, and thus its right to resort to self-defence . . . when its survival is at stake.” The court held, by seven votes to seven, with its president‘s casting vote, that it “cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self defence in which the very survival of a State would be at stake.” Military Necessity in Nuremberg German High Command Trial:

A.

In the Trial of Wilhelm von Leeb and Thirteen Others: United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 30th December, 1947 – 28 the October, 194889

B.

Wilhelm von Leeb and the other thirteen accused in this case were former high-ranking officers in the German Army and Navy, and officers holding high positions in the German High Command (OKW) were charged with Crimes against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity and with Conspiracy to commit such crimes. The War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity charged against them included murder and ill-treatment of prisoners of war and of the civilian population in the occupied territories and their use in prohibited work; discrimination against and persecution and execution of Jews and other sections of the population by the Wehrmacht in co-operation with the Einsatzgruppen and Sonderkommandos of the SD, SIPO and the Secret Field Police; plunder and spoliation and the enforcement of the slave labour programme of the Reich.

C.

They were acquitted of some of the charges, where it was ascertained that military necessity existed objectively and/or subjectively in the particular circumstances.

D.

The Tribunal argued that “The devastation prohibited by the Hague Rules and the usages of war is that not warranted by military necessity. This rule is clear enough but the factual determination as to what constitutes military necessity is difficult. Defendants in this case were in many instances in retreat under arduous conditions wherein their commands

http://www.un.org/law/icjsum/9623.htm http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1948.10.28_United_States_v_von_Leeb.pdf

24


were in serious danger of being cut off. Under such circumstances, a commander must necessarily make quick decisions to meet the particular situation of his command. A great deal of latitude must be accorded to him under such circumstances. What constitutes devastation beyond military necessity in these situations requires detailed proof of an operational and tactical nature. We do not feel that in this case the proof is ample to establish the guilt of any defendant herein on this charge.” E.

[49.8]

Thus, in dealing with Reinhardt's alleged responsibility for plunder and spoliation, the Tribunal said: “The evidence on the matter of plunder and spoliation shows great ruthlessness, but we are not satisfied that it shows beyond a reasonable doubt, acts that were not justified by military necessity.” Military Necessity: The Rendulic Rule: Importance of the Subjective Test:

A.

In The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War, Gary D Solis provides an overview of the Rendulic Rule90 in evaluation of the subjective test in evaluating a defence of Military Necessity:

B.

“In October 1944, Generaloberst Lothar Rendulic was Armed Forces Commander North, which included command of Nazi Forces in Norway. (Between World Wars I and II, Rendulic had practiced law in his native Austria.) Following World War II, he was prosecuted for, among other charges, issuing an order “for the complete destruction of all shelter and means of existence in, and the total evacuation of the entire civilian population of the northern Norwegian province of Finmark...” Entire villages were destroyed, bridges and highways bombed, and port installations wrecked. Tried by an American military commission, Rendulic's defence was military necessity. He presented evidence that the Norwegian population would not voluntarily evacuate and that rapidly approaching Russian forces would use existing housing as shelter and exploit the local population's knowledge of the area to the detriment of retreating German forces. The Tribunal acquitted Rendulic of the charge, finding reasonable his belief that military necessity mandated his orders. His case offers one of the few adjudicated views of what constitutes military necessity.

C.

From the Tribunals opinion:

D.

“Military necessity has been invoked by the defendant's as justifying.. the destruction of villages and towns in an occupied territory... The destruction of property to be lawful must be imperatively demanded by the

The Hostages Trial: Trial of Wilhelm List and Others; United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 8 July 1947 19 February 1948 90

25


necessities of war... There must be some reasonable connection between the destruction of property and the overcoming of the enemy forces. It is lawful to destroy railways, lines of communication, or any other property that might be utilized by the enemy. Private homes and churches even may be destroyed if necessary for military operations. It does not admit the wanton devastation of a district or the wilful infliction of suffering upon its inhabitants for the sake of suffering alone... E.

“The evidence shows that the Russians had very excellent troops in pursuit of the Germans. Two or three land routes were open to them as well as landings by sea behind German lines... The information obtained concerning the intentions of the Russians was limited.. It was with this situation confronting him that he carried out the "scorched earth" policy in the Norwegian province of Finmark.. The destruction was as complete as an efficient army could do it...

F.

“There is evidence in the record that there was no military necessity for this destruction and devastation. An examination of the facts in retrospect can well sustain this conclusion. But we are obliged to judge the situation as it appeared to the defendant at the time. If the facts were such as would justify the action by the exercise of judgement, after giving consideration to all the factors and existing possibilities, even though the conclusion reached may have been faulty, it cannot be said to be criminal. After giving careful consideration to all the evidence on the subject, we are convinced that the defendant cannot be held criminally responsible although when viewed in retrospect, the danger did not actually exist....

G.

“..... We are not called upon to determine whether urgent military necessity for the devastation and destruction in the province of Finmark actually existed. We are concerned with the question whether the defendant at the time of its occurrence acted within the limits of honest judgement on the basis of the conditions prevailing at the time. The course of a military operation by the enemy is loaded with uncertainties... It is our considered opinion that the conditions, as they appeared to the defendant at the time, were sufficient upon which he could honestly conclude that urgent military necessity warranted the decision made. This being true, the defendant may have erred in the exercise of his judgement but he was guilty of no criminal act. We find the defendant not guilty of the charge.

H.

The Rendulic standard remains unchanged. Fifty-four years later, in 2003, the ICTY wrote: “In determining whether an attack was proportionate it is necessary to examine whether a reasonably well-informed person in the circumstances of the actual perpetrator, making reasonable use of the 26


information available to him or her, could have expected excessive civilian casualties to result from the attack.”91 [49.9] Military Necessity: Rendulic Rule: Subjective Honesty in current Military Doctrine: A.

In Unexpected Consequences From Knock-On Effects: A Different Standard for Computer Network Operations?92, Eric Talbot Jensen writes:

B.

“The standard the Court held General Rendulic to was the requirement to give "consideration to all factors and existing possibilities" as they "appeared to the defendant at the time."”

C.

“Note that the requirement to give consideration to all factors and existing possibilities is balanced with the overarching constraint of taking facts as they appear at the time of the decision. Must the commander remain in inaction until he feels he has turned over every stone in search of that last shred of information concerning all factors and possibilities that might affect his decision? The answer must be "no." Instead, he must act in good faith and, in accordance with GPI, do everything feasible to get this information.”

Sustainable Security: Greater Harm of Failing to Mitigate and Prevent Ecological Overshoot and Climate Collapse: [50]

Commons Carrying Capacity Procreation and Consumption Limits:

[51]

In 1972, the now-classic book Limits to Growth93 explored the consequences

for Earth’s ecosystems of exponential growth in population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion. [52]

It concluded that if the present growth trends continued unchanged, the

limits to growth on this planet would be reached sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result would be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity. [53]

It suggested that it would be possible to alter these growth trends and to

establish a condition of ecological and economic stability that is sustainable far into

91 The Prosecutor v. Stanislav Galic - Case No. IT-98-29-T, 05 December 2003 http://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/jud_supplement/supp46-e/galic.htm 92 http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1208&context=auilr 93 Donella Meadows, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and william Behrens II, The Limits to Growth (New York: Universe Books, 1972)

27


the future, if a socio-political system was designed to effect a state of global equilibrium.

[54]

If the world's people decided to strive for this second outcome rather than the

first, the sooner they began working to attain it, the greater would be their chances of success. [55]

All five elements basic to the study of Limits to Growth â&#x20AC;&#x201D; population, food

production, and consumption of non-renewable natural resources â&#x20AC;&#x201D; have been increasing. The amount of their increases each year has followed a pattern that mathematicians call exponential growth.

28


[56]

Since the publication of Limits to Growth, thousands upon thousands of

scientific studies have been conducted and published warning citizens and politicians of the devastating consequences of humanity growing footprint. [57]

Current evidence for the breach or impending breach of Planetary Boundary

Tipping Points94, includes: (i) Loss of Biodiversity and Species Extinctions95; (ii) Climate Change96; (iii) Nitrogen Cycle97; (iv) Ocean Acidification98; (v) Changes in Land Use99; (vi) Global Freshwater Use100; (vii) State Shift in the Earth’s Biosphere101; (viii) Peak Non-Renewable Natural Resources: Scarcity102; and (ix) Socialized Corporate Externality Costs: Trillion Dollar Thefts from Global Natural Capital Commons103, amounting to an ecological overshoot of between 700 to 400,000 percent104, with devastating current and impending ‘overshoot-scarcityconflict’ death spiral consequences105. [58]

It is common scientific knowledge that the overshoot impacts on the

environment are a consequence of Population, Affluence and Technology (I=PAT). [59]

Zero Preventative Legislation: Nevertheless politicians are not even

debating or considering legislation to temporarily restrict citizen’s consumption and procreation practices to lower levels to reduce these devastating impact consequences on the ecological foundation of every nation’s natural capital, which would indicate a preventative legislative focus to avoid overshoot-scarcity-conflict consequences. Difference between Sustainable Peaceful Procreation, Consumption and Production

and

Unsustainable

Scarcity-Conflict

Procreation,

Consumption and Production [60]

In Peace seekers have no plan for enduring peace106, Dr. Jack Alpert

argues that Peaceniks failure to move society from conflict to peace, their establishment of never ending or honoured “peace accords, moral codes, acts of economic justice, and environmental laws, are like traffic signals” which “cause people to relinquish freedoms” but, “do not stop (change) the behaviors that http://tygae.weebly.com/tipping-points.html http://tygae.weebly.com/biodiversity-loss.html 96 http://tygae.weebly.com/climate-change.html 97 http://tygae.weebly.com/nitrogen-cycle.html 98 http://tygae.weebly.com/ocean-acidification.html 99 http://tygae.weebly.com/land-use.html 100 http://tygae.weebly.com/freshwater-use.html 101 http://tygae.weebly.com/biosphere-state-shift.html 102 http://tygae.weebly.com/peak-nnr-scarcity.html 103 http://tygae.weebly.com/corp-externalities.html 104 http://tygae.weebly.com/ecological-overshoot.html 105 http://sqswans.weebly.com/rapid-population-decline.html 106 www.skil.org/position_papers_folder/Peaceniks_Wake_up.html 94 95

29


increase scarcity, conflict, and environmental destruction”107: “result from a faulty perception of what increases or decreases conflict. Where, peace seekers have acted as if conflict is caused by bad leadership maybe they should have acted as if trends in conflict are driven by trends in scarcity. Maybe they would have been more successful if they acted as if trends in scarcity are driven by the collective behaviors of 6 billion people. That while each individual acts benignly to achieve personal objectives the unintentional result is an increase in scarcity and conflict.” Another reason for ignoring the above view of human conflict – according to

[61]

Dr. Alpert -- is that peace seekers, even when successful at restraining the police, military or mediating hostilities, do not change our course toward conflict. They only delay it. In the process, peace seekers consume the very energy required to change the things that would make societies head toward peace. [62]

In Human Predicament: Better Common Sense Required: The Future

of Social Conflict108, Dr. Jack Alpert challenges us to answer two questions Corporate Oligarchs who profit from Unsustainable procreation (demand for more consumers), production and consumption, including its scarcity-conflict resource war consequences; do not want citizens, politicians, police, judges, prosecutors and those tasked with national security to ask themselves. Let’s consider that Peace and conflict are defined not as descriptions of

[63]

behaviour between nations, but as trends describing social conditions. Put differently: Conflict is not defined as the violence between neighbours and nations, but as the unwanted intrusion of one person’s existence and consumption behaviour upon another person. [64]

There are two kinds of conflict:

[64.1]

Direct: he took my car, he enslaved me, he beat me, he raped me, he

killed me; and Indirect. Indirect intrusions are the by-product of other people's behaviour. [64.2]

Indirect: ‘All the trees on our island were consumed by our grandparents,’

is an indirect intrusion of a past generation on a present one. ‘The rich people raised the price of gasoline and we can't afford it,’ and ‘The government is offering people welfare to breed more children’ are current economic and demographic intrusions by one present group on another present group. Free Trade enabling overexploitation, overproduction and overconsumption of a nation’s natural capital

107 108

Alpert, Jack (04/01/04): Footprint vs. Freedom: www.skil.org/position_papers_folder/Footprint_vs_freedom.html youtu.be/sK8WxeGxkPk

30


resources is an economic intrusion by one set of oligarchs upon another set of citizens whose lives depend on such natural capital. [65]

System conflict is the sum of intrusions experienced by each constituent,

summed over all the constituents. A measure of the existing global conflict is the sum of six billion sets of direct and indirect intrusions. A measure of any nation’s conflict is the sum of its population sets of direct and indirect intrusions.

[66]

Using this definition of conflict, any citizen, politician, policeman, judge or

legislator sincerely concerned about finding out whether and how their nation’s socio-economic and political system is moving towards peace or towards conflict; can do so, by determining the answers to the following questions: A.

Procreation Footprint: How many children per family leads to peace; or conversely how many children per family, contributes to greater resource scarcity, and exponential increase in conflict, i.e. an individuals’ ‘breeding war combatant’ status? [According to the research of Dr. Jack Alpert 109,

109

http://sqswans.weebly.com/human-predicament.html

31


the global answer – currently based on current population numbers -- is one child per family leads to peace; two or more children leads to conflict] B.

Production/Carbon Footprint: How much exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources relative to the nation’s Natural Capital carrying capacity footprint leads to peace; or conversely how much of a nation’s non-renewable and renewable natural resources can or should a corporation exploit into production of consumer goods, before such exploitation and production contributes to greater resource scarcity and exponential increase in conflict; i.e. a corporations ‘production combatant’ status? [All utilization of non-renewable natural resources— fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, contributes to scarcityconflict. Peaceful utilization of Aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric natural habitats requires that they be degraded only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are regenerated by Nature. Exploiting renewable resources above their capacity to regenerate is not sustainable and does not contribute to peaceful resource relations; i.e. contribute to scarcity-conflict110. See Carbon Footprint111]

C.

Consumption/Carbon Footprint: How much consumption of nonrenewable and renewable natural resources relative to the nation’s Natural Capital carrying capacity footprint leads to peace; or conversely how much consumption of non-renewable and renewable natural resources relative to the nation’s Natural Capital carrying capacity footprint, contributes to greater resource scarcity, and exponential increase in conflict,

i.e.

an

individuals

‘consumption

combatant

status’?

All

consumption of non-renewable natural resources—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at

any

level,

contributes

to

scarcity-conflict.

Peaceful

consumption of Aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric natural habitats requires that they be degraded only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are regenerated by Nature. Exploiting renewable resources above their capacity to regenerate is not sustainable and does not contribute to peaceful resource relations; i.e. contribute to scarcity-

“Sustainable natural resource utilization behavior involves the utilization of renewable natural resources—water, cropland, pastureland, forests, and wildlife—exclusively. Renewable natural resource reserves can be depleted only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. The utilization of nonrenewable natural resources—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, is not sustainable. Aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric natural habitats can be degraded only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are regenerated by Nature. All other natural resource utilization behavior and all other natural habitat degradation are unsustainable—period.” (Sustainability Defined, by Chris Clugston, author: Scarcity) 111 http://www.carbonfootprint.com 110

32


conflict112. [See Nation Footprint113; Finance Footprint114, Business Footprint115; Personal Footprint116] [67]

In the absence of the worlds political, economic and corporate leaders

confronting and acknowledging the difference between sustainable peaceful consumption and procreation and unsustainable scarcity-conflict aggravating consumption and procreation; and implementing legislation and Jurisprudence in accordance thereto; Dr. Alpert provides proof how the global AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence Suicide S.V. Titanic has as much chance of muddling through the coming ‘Falling Man Syndrome’ Crisis of Conflict, as an individual sitting in an unbelted car crash. (Non-Linearity and Social Conflict117) [68]

Dr. Alpert compares humanity’s belief that “in 200 years, our Right to Breed

and consume has resulted in the exponential consumption of over half of the Earth's resources, and nothing bad has happened yet”; to a man who has fallen out of a 150 story building, passing the window of the 60 th story, calling out to a friend “‘I’ve fallen 90 stories in the past 5 seconds and nothing bad has happened yet”.

Conclusion [68.1]

Consequently

we

submit

this

Æquilibriæx

jurisprudence

(a)

denouncement and recommendations for amendment of “Parties to the Conflict” and “Prisoner of War” definitions, respectively to “Scarcity Combatant Parties to the Conflict” and “Political Prisoner of Sex and War”; as detailed in Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War118, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950; in terms of Article 142119 and 143120; and (b)

Ibid: Sustainability Defined, by Chris Clugston, author: Scarcity http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_for_nations/ 114 http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_for_finance/ 115 http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_for_business/ 116 http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/personal_footprint/ and http://www.myfootprint.org/ 117 youtu.be/W5capqGod9A 118 http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/INTRO/305?OpenDocument 119 Article 142: Each of the High Contracting Parties shall be at liberty to denounce the present Convention. The denunciation shall be notified in writing to the Swiss Federal Council, which shall transmit it to the Governments of all the High Contracting Parties. The denunciation shall take effect one year after the notification thereof has been made to the Swiss Federal Council. However, a denunciation of which notification has been made at a time when the denouncing Power is involved in a conflict shall not take effect until peace has been concluded, and until after operations connected with the release and repatriation of the persons protected by the present Convention have been terminated. The denunciation shall have effect only in respect of the denouncing Power. It shall in no way impair the obligations which the Parties to the conflict shall remain bound to fulfil by virtue of the principles of the law of nations, as they result from the usages established among civilized peoples, from the laws of humanity and the dictates of the public conscience. 120 Article 143: The Swiss Federal Council shall register the present Convention with the Secretariat of the United Nations. The Swiss Federal Council shall also inform the Secretariat of the United Nations of all ratifications, accessions and denunciations received by it with respect to the present Convention. 112 113

33


Recommendations: Honourable ‘In Your Face’ Public Population and Consumption Reduction Campaigns. Signed and Sworn to at George on this the 03rd & 14th day of December 2013.

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se George, South Africa Alien on Pale Blue Dot

34


IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF GEORGE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case: GMC 4643-13 In the matter between: Lara Johnstone (1), Francisco Martin (2) (aka Gen. Patton); Soul-Friend Applicants Nanette Derenzi (3); Dennis McGinn (4) MI-Psych Integrity Applicants Timothy McVeigh (5); Erik Prince (6); Vladimir Putin (7); David Petraeus (8); Ray ODierno (9); Stan McChrystal (10) and John Mulholland (11) MI-R2R-B2B-Fam Applicants

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Brad Blanton (1); Maggie Doyle (2); Radical Honesty (CEO) Respondents Clive Henry Johnstone (3); Ann Elizabeth Johnstone (4); Graeme Henry Johnstone (5); Wendy Johnstone (6); Andre Bosman Johnstone (7) Biological Family Respondents Chelsea Elizabeth Manning (b. Bradley Edward) (8) Masculinity, Honour, Sex & War Respondent Taber Shadburne (9); Greg Small (10) Marina Dervan (11); Clara Griffin (12); Raven Dana (13); Anne Alexander (14); Susan Campbell (15); Stephanie Roth (16) Radical Honesty (Directors/Trainers) Respondents

Transparency Independent Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Karen Marshall Johnstone Family Respondents Rachel Maddow Radical Honesty Respondents Judge Jay Bybee Radical Honoursty Civilian Applicants Military: David Coombs Radical Honoursty Military Applicants

FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT: Gag Order, Invocation of Cultural Law, Declaratory Orders: Psychological Integrity et al Take Notice that Lara Johnstone (â&#x20AC;&#x153;hereinafter called the Applicantâ&#x20AC;?) intends to make an application to this Court for the following orders: [1] Sealed Gag Order: Ordering the Applicants and Respondents to keep the contents of this application and subsequent proceedings in this matter confidential, until all parties have granted their fully informed consent for the unsealing and disclosure thereof. [2] Invocation of Cultural Law and Habeus Mentem Psychological Integrity Declaratory Order: Permission to invoke1 cultural law2 in S. 15(3), 30,

1

Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A) at 397: Appellate Division held that neither common nor customary law was prima facie applicable. Courts had to consider all the circumstances of


31, and 18; to enable the Applicant to honour the duty and responsibility to uphold the principles upon which her Radical Honoursty culture is based; and Psychological Integrity in Section 123; the former which may require the application of choice of law rules. Declare the Applicants Right to Cultural and Religious Psychological Integrity: The Right of Every Individual to their own mind and beliefs; irrespective of the alleged eccentric, heretical, irrational or fundamentalist nature of such racial, cultural, or religious beliefs; who shall not be deprived of liberty unless duly and impartially convicted of a criminal offence. [3]

[..]

[4] Applicant Judicial Amicus Curiae Observers: Legal MI Cryptic Notice to Political Prisoners of (Sex and) War tentatively selected to be invited to act as Chelsea Manning’s Left and Right Wing Cracker Lt. Spokespersons, for MISO 528 004, MI6GASM project, a project to help Yuri, Alexi and Jack crashland the End of Industrial Civilization, as honourably as possible.

I the undersigned, LARA JOHNSTONE do hereby make oath and say: [1] I am an adult Radical Honoursty Ecofeminist Guerrylla Law Sustainable Security practicing Guerrylla Lawfare paralegal (subsequently referred to as “applicant”), member of Friend of Wikileaks (FoWL) and the Radical Honoursty culture4; resident in George, Southern Cape, RSA; where I run a small EcoFeminist pedal-powered wormery business. [2] I am neither anthropocentrically liberal nor conservative, but a low tech EcoFeminist and founder of the ideology of CommonSism5: Common Sense Guerrylla Laws for a Sustainable Commons and Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence.

a case, and, without any preconceived view about the applicability of one or other legal system, select the appropriate law on the basis of its inquiry. 2 SALC, Sept 1999: Report on Conflicts of law: P.22: ‘1.58. The Constitution now provides an entitlement for invoking customary law in legal suits. Because ss 30 and 31 specifically guarantee an individual and a group's right to pursue a culture of choice, it could be argued that application of customary law has become a constitutional right. Previously, the state had assumed complete discretion in deciding whether and to what extent customary law should be recognized, an attitude typical of colonial thinking, for Africans were subject to whatever policies the conquering state chose to impose on them. Now, however, the state has a duty to allow people to participate in the culture they choose, implicit in this duty is a responsibility to uphold the institutions on which that culture is based.’ 3 12. Freedom and security of the person: (2) Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity.. 4 SA Constitutional Court ruling of 03 May 2012 in CCT 23-10, reads as follows: “Ms. Lara Johnstone, Member of Radical Honesty Culture and Religion, is admitted as an amicus curiae” 5 http://sqswans.weebly.com/guerrylla-law.html

2


[3] The facts set out herein fall within my (sometimes referred to as “Applicant”) personal knowledge, unless otherwise indicated by the context, and are to the best of my belief true and correct. [4]

[..]

MASCULINITY, HONOUR, SEX AND WAR WHISTLEBLOWER: CAIN JERICHO’S POLITICAL PRISONERS OF SEX AND WAR [5] Chelsea Elizabeth Manning (born Bradley Edward Manning, December 17, 1987) is a United States Army soldier who was convicted in July 2013 of violations of the Espionage Act and other offenses, after releasing the largest set of classified documents ever leaked to the public. Manning was sentenced to confinement for 35 years and to be dishonorably discharged from the Army. This was reduced by 112 days for harsh treatment received during pre-trial confinement at Quantico. Credit for other pre-trial confinement and good behavior could result in release on parole after eight years. [6] Invitation to Chelsea Manning to lead President Obama’s Political Prisoner’s of Sex and War Left and Right Wing Cracker Lt. Spokespersons, for MISO 528 004, MI6GASM project, a project to help Yuri, Alexi and Jack crashland the End of Industrial Civilization, as honourably as possible. [7] The JAG Ecology of Peace Invitation Proposal aims to disclose the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS, as a ‘Shock and Awe’ Wake Up Call to World Citizens of the relationship between Sex and War; including to the most obtuse and ignorant, to provide stimulation and opportunity for an International Public Discourse Debate about implementing the Ecology of Peace commandment into International Law; by adopting the ‘Walk Your Flaming Thunderbolt of Wisdom’ Treaty; in support of preventing Ecological Collapse and possible Near Term Extinction and/or the Tragedy of the Common’s Nuclear War. [8] Applicant’s Suggested Prisoner’s of Sex and War:

Role

for

President

Obama’s

Political

[9] The tentatively invited Political Prisoners of Sex and War, shall be given a two week furlough release from their respective prisons, to accompany President Obama’s delegation to Southern Africa, to disclose the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS documentation; once all Governmental Official Fully Informed Consenting agreements are acquired.

3


[10] The Political Prisoners may speak freely about their opinions regarding the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS documentation and related Sex and War issues, in accordance to their First Amendment rights. All Political Prisoners may, if they so desire, apply to the relevant Left Wing Southern African government, or Right Wing Boer Volkstaat Organisation or City, for ‘Political Prisoner of Sex and War’ Asylum status. The Southern African Government and Volkstaat Organisations are free to accept or decline such Asylum applications. Political Prisoners of Sex and War who choose to return to their prisons, shall receive a recommendation to the Prison Parole authorities, thanking them for their support to educate citizens on the relationship between Sex and War with the aim of implementing Ecology of Peace principles as the foundation into International Law. [11] Applicants Suggested Invitations to Political Prisoner’s of Sex and War; on behalf of Secondary Military B2B Family (Freemason Abolitionists): [12] Vladimir Putin: Anders Breivik, Jan Laaman, Mumia Abu-Jamal and Leonard Peltier: [12.1] Anders Behring Breivik (born 13 February 1979) is the perpetrator of the 2011 Norway attacks. In a sequential bombing and mass shooting on 22 July 2011, he bombed government buildings in Oslo, resulting in eight deaths, then carried out a mass shooting at a camp of the Workers' Youth League (AUF) of the Labour Party on the island of Utøya, where he killed 69 people, mostly teenagers. He was convicted of mass murder, causing a fatal explosion, and terrorism in August 2012. [12.2] Jaan Karl Laaman (born 1948) was a member of the United Freedom Front. He grew up in Roxbury, Massachusetts and Buffalo, New York. His family emigrated to the United States from Estonia when he was a child. He has a son. He is currently serving a 53-year prison sentence for his role in the bombings of United States government buildings while a member of the United Freedom Front, an American leftist group in the 1980s. In the 1960s, Laaman worked in Students for a Democratic Society and community organizations and advocated against the Vietnam War and racism. He facilitated youth development in the Black Panther Party and the Puerto Rican Young Lords street gang. In 1972 he was arrested and charged with bombing a Richard Nixon re-election headquarters building and a police station in New Hampshire and was sentenced to 20 years. However, he was released in 1978. In 1979, he and Kazi Toure helped to organize the Amandla Festival of Unity to support an end to apartheid in Southern Africa, which featured musician Bob Marley. He was eventually caught with several other members of the United Freedom Front, referred to as the Ohio 7, including leader Tom Manning in 4


1984. While originally charged with seditious conspiracy, Laaman was found guilty of five bombings, one attempted bombing, and criminal conspiracy, and sentenced to 53 years in prison. In 1977, an important New Hampshire State Supreme Court case was won by Laaman. Helgemoe was the warden of the New Hampshire State Prison. Laaman sued to receive reading material which he was refused. Helgemoe claimed that the material was radical, seditious, and even included bomb-making instructions. The New Hampshire Supreme Court decided in favor of Laaman, and this case eventually was used as a justification for offering college level education in New Hampshire prisons for the first time. The case has been cited for various reasons with respect to prisoners' rights in other states was well. [12.3] Mumia Abu-Jamal (born Wesley Cook on April 24, 1954) is an American convict, serving a life sentence for the 1981 murder of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner. His original sentence of death, handed down at his first trial in July 1982, was commuted to life imprisonment in 2012. Described as "perhaps the world's best known death-row inmate" by The New York Times, supporters and detractors have disagreed on his guilt, whether he received a fair trial, and the appropriateness of the death penalty. [12.4] Leonard Peltier (born September 12, 1944) is a Native American activist and member of the American Indian Movement (AIM). In 1977 he was convicted and sentenced to two consecutive terms of life imprisonment for first degree murder in the shooting of two Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents during a 1975 conflict on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Peltier's indictment and conviction have been the subject of much controversy; Amnesty International placed his case under the "Unfair Trials" category of its Annual Report: USA 2010, citing concerns with the fairness of the proceedings. Peltier is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Coleman in Florida. [13] Ray ODierno: Horst Mahler, Thomas Manning, Albert Woodfox and Jose Padilla: [13.1] Horst Mahler (born 23 January 1936 in Haynau, Lower Silesia, Germany, now Chojn贸w, Poland) is a former German lawyer and political activist. He once was an extreme-left militant, a founding member of the Red Army Faction. Subsequently he became a Maoist and later shifted to the extreme-right. He was for a time a member of the National Democratic Party of Germany. He has been repeatedly convicted of Volksverhetzung ("incitement of popular hatred") and Holocaust denial and is currently serving a 12-year prison sentence. [13.2] Thomas Manning: Born to a Boston postal clerk, Thomas "Tom" William Manning is known for his involvement in the death of a police officer during a

5


routine traffic stop, and for his anti-apartheid involvement with the United Freedom Front (UFF) who bombed a series of US military and commercial institutes in the 1970s and early 1980s. As a youth, he shined shoes and raised pigeons, before finding work as a stockboy. He joined the US Military in 1963, and the following year was stationed at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba before being transferred off to spend the following year in the Vietnam War. Some time shortly after 1965, he was sentenced by a Massachusetts state court to five years in prison for armed robbery and assault, serving the last ten months in Massachusetts Correctional Institution - Cedar Junction. He claims it was during these years that he became heavily politicized, through his interactions with other prisoners. After his release in 1971, he married Carol and together they produced three children, Jeremy, Tamara, and Jonathan. Together with his arrest for the bombings, Manning was also convicted for his role in killing New Jersey police officer Philip Lamonaco during a traffic stop on December 21, 1981. The killings launched the largest manhunt in NJ police history, and ended with the arrests of Raymond Levasseur, Patricia Gross, Richard Williams, Jaan Laaman, and Barbara Curzi on November 4, 1984, and Manning and his wife Carol on April 24, 1985; collectively referred to as the Ohio 7. All of them were associated with the United Freedom Front. He was sentenced on February 19, 1987, to 58 years in federal prison. [13.3] Albert Woodfox was a member of the Angola Three, three prison inmates who were put in solitary confinement in Louisiana State Penitentiary, a.k.a. Angola Prison, after the 1972 killing of a prison guard. Woodfox spent 40 years of solitary confinement as of 2013. The prisoners have been the subject of two documentary films and international attention. The three men were sent to Angola in 1971 after a conviction for armed robbery. Woodfox escaped from a Louisiana courthouse during his sentencing for armed robbery and joined the Black Panther Party. As members of the prison's chapter of the Black Panthers, Wallace and Woodfox became activists seeking to improve conditions at Angola. [13.4] JosĂŠ Padilla (born October 18, 1970), also known as Abdullah al-Muhajir or Muhajir Abdullah, is a United States citizen from Brooklyn, New York, who was convicted in federal court of aiding terrorists. Padilla was arrested in Chicago on May 8, 2002, on suspicion of plotting a radiological bomb ("dirty bomb") attack. Padilla was held for three and a half years as an "enemy combatant." He was subjected to what were called enhanced interrogation techniques, regarded as torture under International law, including sleep deprivation, shackling and stress positions, the administration of psychotropic drugs, and solitary confinement. On August 16, 2007, a federal jury found him guilty of conspiring to kill people in an overseas jihad, and to fund and support overseas terrorism. On January 22, 2008,

6


Padilla was sentenced by Judge Marcia G. Cooke of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida to 17 years and four months in prison. [14] Stan McChrystal: Terry Nichols, Bowe Bergdahl, Lynne Irene Stewart and Justin Wright: [15] Terry Lynn Nichols (born April 1, 1955) is a convicted accomplice in the Oklahoma City bombing. Prior to his incarceration, he held a variety of short-term jobs, working as a farmer, grain elevator manager, real estate salesman and ranch hand. He met his future conspirator, Timothy McVeigh, during a brief stint in the U.S. Army, which ended in 1989 when he requested a hardship discharge after less than one year of service. In 1994 and 1995, he conspired with McVeigh in the planning and preparation of the Oklahoma City bombing â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the truck bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on April 19, 1995. The bombing claimed the lives of 168 people, including 19 children. After a federal trial in 1997, Nichols was convicted of conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction and eight counts of involuntary manslaughter for killing federal law enforcement personnel. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole because the jury deadlocked on the death penalty. He is incarcerated at ADX Florence, a super maximum security prison in Florence, Colorado. He shares a cell block that is commonly referred to as "Bombers Row" with Ramzi Yousef and Ted Kaczynski. [16] Bowe Robert Bergdahl (born March 28, 1986) is a United States Army soldier who has been in the captivity of the Taliban-aligned Afghanistan Haqqani network since June 2009. Bergdahl was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, based at Fort Richardson, Alaska. During his unit's normal deployment rotation to Afghanistan, he went missing on June 30, 2009, near the town of Yahya Khel in the Paktika Province, which is in the south-east of Afghanistan, right on the border to Pakistan. The area in which Bergdahl was captured is right next to Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas. He is believed to be held by the Haqqani network, an insurgent group affiliated with the Taliban, probably somewhere in Pakistan. Since then, the Taliban have released five videos showing him in captivity. The Taliban originally demanded $1 million and the release of 21 Afghan prisoners and Aafia Siddiqui in exchange for Bergdahl's release. They threatened to execute Bergdahl if Siddiqui was not released. Most of the Afghan prisoners are being held at Guantanamo Bay. The Taliban later reduced its demand to five Taliban prisoners in exchange for Bergdahl's release. [17] Lynne Irene Stewart (born October 8, 1939) is a former attorney who was known for representing controversial, poor, and often unpopular defendants. She 7


was convicted on charges of conspiracy and providing material support to terrorists in 2005, and sentenced to 28 months in prison. Her felony conviction led to her being automatically disbarred. She was convicted of helping pass messages from her client, Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, an Egyptian cleric convicted of planning terror attacks, to his followers in al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, an organization designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the United States Secretary of State. She was re-sentenced on July 15, 2010, to 10 years in prison in light of her alleged perjury at her trial. She is currently serving her sentence at the Federal Medical Center, Carswell, a federal prison near Fort Worth, Texas. [18] Justin Wright: CE3046, HMP YOI, Portland, Dorset, DT5 1DL, UK. Animal liberationist sentenced to 10 years for conspiracy to commit arson. [19] David Petraeus: Edgar Steele, Jeremy Hammond, Marie Mason and Eric McDavid: [20] Edgar J. Steele (born July 5, 1945) is an American author and former attorney from northern Idaho, best known for serving as the defense attorney for Richard G. Butler, the founder of the white supremacist Aryan Nations. On June 11, 2010, Steele and another man were arrested and charged in connection with an alleged murder-for-hire plot to kill Steele's wife Cyndi and her mother. Steele's wife and other supporters, including former Louisiana State Representative David Duke, stated during Steele's trial that the allegations were false, and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation had arrested Steele simply to silence him. Steele was found guilty of conspiracy to commit murder on May 5, 2011, and was sentenced to 50 years' imprisonment on November 9, 2011. He is now incarcerated in Victorville, California. [21] Jeremy Hammond (born January 8, 1985) is a political activist, web developer and musician from Chicago. He is currently facing federal criminal charges for allegedly publicizing internal files of the private spying agency Stratfor through the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks. [22] Eric McDavid and Marie Mason6 were arrested in January 2006 and September 2008 respectively. Marie was arrested in May 2008 by the federal authorities for charges related to two acts of property damage which were claimed by ELF in 1999 and 2000: damage of an office connected to a GMO's (Genetically Modified Organisms) research and destroying a piece of logging equipment. She faced a life imprisonment before accepting a plea bargain, in September 2008. She was sentenced on February 5, 2009 to almost 22 years - the longest sentence of any "Green Scare" prisoner. ("Green Scare" is the name given to the arrests of animal 6

http://june11.org/

8


rights and environmental activists accused of economic sabotage. Federal authorities have requested insane penalties -often life imprisonment- and have named the activists as "terrorists", despite the fact that no one has ever been killed or injured in any of these actions). The penalty imposed to Marie was even larger than the one that was suggested by the prosecutor who indicted her. The appeal for reduction of her sentence was rejected in 2010. [23] In the case of Eric McDavid, the state charged him with "thought crime", i.e that he was thinking of doing some aggressive actions, without them having been carried out, or any other evidence against him. Currently, he is serving a 20-yearsentence in federal prison since January 2006 when he was arrested as a part of the ongoing campaign "Green Scare" of the U.S. government. Eric was trapped by an undercover informant who spied every move of his. He was targeted by the state for his political beliefs and his case is indicative of the dimension that can be taken by the repression against anyone who dares to resist. [24] John Mulholland: Ted Kaczynski, Beate Zschape, Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov: [24.1] Theodore John "Ted" Kaczynski (born May 22, 1942), also known as the "Unabomber", is an American mathematician, social critic, and multiple murderer. Between 1978 and 1995, Kaczynski engaged in a nationwide bombing campaign against people involved with modern technology, planting or mailing numerous home-made bombs, ultimately killing a total of three people and injuring 23 others. [24.2] Beate Zsch채pe (born 2 January 1975 in Jena, Germany as Beate Apel) is a German right-wing extremist and an alleged member of the neo-Nazi terror group National Socialist Underground (NSU). [25] Vladimir Vlasov and Mickhail Klevachov: In 2005 two Russian public activists from Moscow, Vladimir Vlasov and Mikhail Klevachov7, were first arrested and then sentenced to long prison terms (18 and 20 years, respectively). In the absence of any direct evidence they were charged with an attempt to blow up a Moscow-Grozny passenger train on June 12, 2005. As in the Arakcheev-Khudyakov affair, the accused were initially acquitted by jury trial, but the acquittal was repelled by the Supreme Court on the formal pretext of an out-of-courtroom contact between a jury member and a member of defense team (the jury member simply asked the attorney for the directions to the courtroom). The train from the Chechen capital was derailed on 12 June 2005, 153 km from Moscow. Vlasov and Klevachev were arrested on July 1. The investigation came to them through the testimony of 7

http://www.politzeky.ru/politzeki/operativnaya-informatsiya/22420.html

9


witnesses, the stored navy IL one of them, and checking calls on cell phones in the area of a terrorist attack. During the searches of their apartments nationalist literature was found, along with components of the explosive device. Vlasov and Klevachev were charged with terrorism (Article 205.3 of the Criminal Code), the attempted murder of two or more persons on the grounds of ethnic hatred (Art. 30.3 and Art. 105.2), the illegal acquisition and possession of explosives (Article 222.3).

[26]

Relief Requested:

[27] Considering the circumstances, I request invited secondary Applicants and Respondents to consider the relief as set out in the Notice of Motion to which this Affidavit is attached. Signed and Sworn to at George on this the 17th day of October 2013, the Deponent acknowledging that she knows and understands the contents of this Affidavit, and that she has no objection to taking the prescribed oath and that the oath is binding on her conscience.

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se George, South Africa Alien on Pale Blue Dot

10


14-03-25: GMC 4643-13: POW Invite Notices