14-02-25: UN-WGAD: CA SegPris: Aex Amicus by Tygae Aex

UNITED NATIONS WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION CA Prisoners1 & Prison Organisations2 Petitioners - versus United States of America; State of California; Jerry Brown: Governor of State of California; and Matthew Cate: Secretary: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Respondents

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DATE: 25 February 2014 Case Number: Unknown Æquilibriæx Sustainable Security Theses Brief In Propria Persona by Amici Curiae, Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue Dot in support of CA Prisoners who sign the MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Citizen Oath, legally agreeing to (a) be sterilized prior to their release and (b) to consume below carrying capacity limits for the rest of their lives; to be released by the CDC.

Chair Rapporteur: Mr. Mads Andenas (Norway); Vice-Chair: Mr. Vladimir Tochilovsky (Ukraine); Committee Members: Mr. Malick El Hadji Sow (Senegal); Ms. Shaheen Sardar Ali (Pakistan); & Mr. Roberto Garretón (Chile).

[1]

RELIEF SOUGHT:

[1.1]

Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue Dot respectfully moves

the Working Group for permission to appear Pro Se for the limited purpose of being admitted as an Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence supporting Amicus Curiae, in this matter. [1.2]

Alien further moves this Court for permission to file the attached Brief

In Propria Persona by Amici Curiae, Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue 1

Walter Coto; Todd Ashker; Christopher Flores; Alfred Sandoval; Mutope Duguma s/n James Darren Crawford; Javier Zubiate; S. Heshima Denham; Scott Stoner; Victor Cantero; Synrico J'Marcus Rodgers; Roberto Campa Lopez; Philforman, Michael Reed Dorrough; Robbie Riva; Michael Spencer; GR; DC; Donald Lee Moran Jr; Carlos Roberto Robledo; Derk Carbajal; BI; and Richard Satterfield 2 California Prison Focus; Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law; Families to Amend California's Three Strikes; Fair Chance Project; California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement; Justice for Families; The Real Cost of Prisons Project; American Friends Service Committee; Community Futures Collective; Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights; California Prison Moratorium Project; Legal Services for Prisoners with Children; Disability Rights Legal Center; Disability Rights California; League of United Latin-American Citizens

Dot in support of an Æquilibriæx Sustainable Security Theses problem solving orientated approach to this dispute. Æquilibriæx: Balanced Eco/Anthropocentric Jurisprudence:

[2] [2.1]

(books),

Æquilibriæx is derived from æquus (equal), libra/æ (balance), libri lex

(law).

Æquilibriæx

Jurisprudence,

i.e.

Equal

balanced

Eco/Anthropocentric law; occurs as Equilibriæx Jurisprudence adherence to the laws of nature / ecology, with the goal of all species living in carry capacity harmony with another; and Aquilibriæx Jurisprudence adherence to laws of human nature, which the goal of harmony between humans and their tribes, based upon fully informed consenting agreements. [2.2]

Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence recognizes all Leaver beings, animal and

plant species, individuals, corporations, families, tribes, etc., rights to legal personhood; differentiating between Sustainable (Leaver) and Unsustainable (Taker) procreation, consumption and production practices; where Leavers are legally rewarded for their contribution towards Æquilibriæx inter and intraspecies harmony, and Takers are legally penalized for their contribution towards Æquilibriæx inter and/or intra-species disharmony and dischord. [3]

INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE:

[3.1]

ANDREA MUHRRTEYN: Andrea Muhrrteyn [feminine of Andrew

Martin], is a nom de plume for Lara Johnstone. A.

ANDREA: Andrea derives from the Greek ανή (anēr), genitive ανδ ό (andrós), that indicates the man as opposed to the woman [Andrea Alciato, (1492 - 1550), was an Italian jurist and writer, regarded as the founder of the French school of legal humanists. Alciati is most famous for his Emblemata, a collection of short Latin verse texts and accompanying woodcuts: Emblema CLXXXIX says: Mentem, non formam, plus pollere which means, Intelligence Matters, Not Beauty].

MUHRRTEYN: Muhrr + teyn: Muhrr, for the Holy Oil, Myhrr and Teyn, is Nyet (No, in Russian) backwards. Mu: Mu: important in Zen & Discordian practice; also represents MU, a fictional parallel universe,

continent, or place; or a MisUnderstood word. Martin also refers to Francis Marion, aka Benjamin Martin, from the movie The Patriot, whose guerrilla codename was The Swamp Fox. Francis Marion was the father of Guerrylla Warfare. C.

ANDREW MARTIN: Andrew Martin, is the U.S. Robots and Mechanical Men robot, NDR-113, in Isaac Asimov and Robert Silverberg’s Positronic Man (1993). It is the story of Andrew’s quest for legal recognition as a human.

ANDREA MUHRRTEYN: Andrea Muhrrteyn is thus a Gaia Primitivist Guerrylla Lawfare robot on an Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence quest.

[3.2] A.

Alien on Pale Blue Dot refers to: ALIEN: Hardin (1980)3: Religious historian, Ernest Renan invented the “Man from Mars”, or in this case that ‘Woman from Venus’, that “thoroughly rational, inquisitive being, who asks earthlings to explain what they do in terms that can be understood by an intelligence completely free of all traditional terrestrial beliefs, assumptions, and prejudices.”

PALE BLUE DOT: Sagan C: Pale Blue Dot4: “Consider again that dot .. home where everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives.., every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam. The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by generals and emperors so that, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Our posturing, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light….. The significance of our lives and our fragile planet is determined only by our own wisdom and courage. We are the custodians of life's meaning… knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better to embrace hard truth than a reassuring fable. If we crave some cosmic purpose, then let us find ourselves a worthy goal…. Once we overcome our fear of being tiny, we

Hardin, G (1980): Limited World, Limited Rights, Biological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA Commentaries: Rights and Liberties, Society, 17 (4):5-8. May/June 1980 4 Sagan, Carl (1994). Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space (1st ed.). New York: Random House.

find ourselves on the threshold of a vast Universe that utterly dwarfs — in time, space, and potential — the tidy anthropocentric proscenium of our ancestors. [4]

As such Andrea Muhrrteyn, an Alien on Pale Blue Dot respectfully

requests Amicus Curiae status herein. Dated at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot: 25 February 2014

LARA JOHNSTONE, AKA ANDREA MUHRRTEYN, Pro Se PO Box 4052, George, 6539, South Africa Tel/Fax: (044) 870 7239 jmcswan@mweb.co.za REGISTRAR: WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION: Working Group on Arbitrary Detention c/o Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Office at Geneva 8-14, avenue de la Paix 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Fax: +41 22 9179006 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (wgad@ohchr.org) PETITIONERS: Peter Schey Esq Carlos R Holguin Esq Ctr for Human Rights & Const Law 256 South Occidental Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90057-1256 Tel: (213) 388 8693 (pschey@centerforhumanrights.org) (crholguin@centerforhumanrights.org)

Senior Counsel: Melinda Bird, Esq Disability Rights California 350 South Bixel Street, Suite 290 Los Angeles CA 90017 Tel: (213) 213-8000 Fax: (213) 213-8001 (Melinda.Bird@disabilityrightsca.org)

Marilyn McMahon Esq California Prison Focus 1904 Franklin Street, Suite 507 Oakland CA 94612 Tel: 510-734-3600 (marilyn@prisons.org)

Carol Strickman Esq Legal Svc for Prisoners with Children 1540 Market Street Suite 490 San Francisco CA 94102 Tel: 415-255-7036 ext 324 (Carol@prisonerswithchildren.org)

RESPONDENTS: United States of America c/o Ambassador Samantha Power US Mission to the United Nations c/o Press and Public Diplomacy Section US Mission to the United Nations 799 United Nations Plaza New York, N.Y. 10017 Tel: 212-415-4062 | Fax: 212-415-4053 Contact Form5

State of California c/o: Attorney General Kamala Harris c/o Appellate Coordinator Office of the Attorney General Consumer Law Section 300 S. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 Contact Form6

Gov. Jerry Brown Governor of California c/o State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 445-2841 Fax: (916) 558-3160 Contact Form7

Matthew Cate: Secretary CA Dept of Corrections & Rehab via: Office of the Ombudsman 1515 S Street, Room 311 South Sacramento, CA 95811 Sara Malone: High Desert SP (Sara.Malone@cdcr.ca.gov) Gabriel Vela: CA Corr Inst (Gabriel.Vela@cdcr.ca.gov) Jean Weiss: Pelican Bay SP (Jean.Weiss@cdcr.ca.gov) Cherita Wofford: CA SATF (Cherita.Wofford@cdcr.ca.gov) Sonya Valle: Kern Valley SP (Sonya.Valle@cdcr.ca.gov)

http://usun.state.gov/about/contact/index.htm https://oag.ca.gov/services-info/17209-brief/add 7 http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php 6

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ii-viii

Introduction & Summary of Argument

01-05

Statement of Facts

05-06

Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence Interest of Amici

06-06

Argument

07-52

Æquilibriæx CommonSism v. Civilized Patriarchy Legal Plantation Reality Reality: Factual – Interpretive – Ideological

07-15 07-08

Civilized Patriarchy

10-12

A Credible Æquilibriæx Judicial System

12-13

Civilized Patriarchy’s Innocence for Sale Indulgence Legal Matrix

13-14

Thieving, Conquering, Murdering & Culling Acts of Un/Lawfulness

14-15

Civilized Patriarchy: The Legal Plantation Mastah’s of ‘Relevance’

15-15

The Irrelevant Scarcity-Combatant Taker Social Contract

16-27

Our Flat Earth Social Contract ‘Rule of Force’ Ideological Prison

16-18

Brief Overview of Birth Certificate Licensing Slavery

18-19

Earth: The Human Factory Farming Slavery Planet

19-21

Conclusion: Slavery Freedumb vs Responsible Freedom Options

21-23

Flat Earth Jurisprudence and Ecological Overshoot induced impending Intra & Inter-Cultural Resource Scarcity Armageddon Mobjustice Genocide Conflict

23-25

Current Flat Earth Social Contract Rule of Force Prisons

26-27

Eco-Innocent Leaver CommonSism Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence

27-51

Primitivist / MILINT Ecology of Peace Guerrylla Lawfare Laws

27-28

Judicial Procedures and Monastic Prisons under an International Law CommonSism social contract

28-29

CommonSism Justice Must be Absolute

29-31

CommonSism Rule of Law Social Contract Judicial Proceedings

31-34

CommonSism violations

31-32

Voluntarist: Fully Informed Consent violations

32-34

Monastery Prisons focussed on enabling Prisoner Reflection

34-39

CommonSism Reflection: Personal Responsibility

36-37

CommonSism Reflection: Ecological & Egological Literacy

37-39

Reflection Process: Honourable –v– Dishonourable

39-42

Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Engagement

40-41

Dishonourable Passive Aggressive Fundamentalist ii

Violence Avoidance

41-42

International Law relating to Just War Inter-Cultural Conflict

42-44

Objectors to CommonSism Eco-Civilization Option

44-51

Believers that Non-Europeans are Untermenschen Is it racist to say that ‘Non-Europeans breed like untermenschen’?

45-47 47-51

Legally Defining the term ‘Racist’

47-49

Conclusion: Is it racist to say that ‘Non-Europeans breed like untermenschen’?

49-51

Conclusion: Relief Recommended

51-52

Certificate of Filing and Service

53-53

Online Encl: MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Oath3, submitted to the Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops’ Military Advisory Board (“MAB”). Declaration to US Navy Judge Advocate General: Vice Admiral Nanette Derenzi, CC: Asst. Sec. for Energy, Installations and Environment: Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn; Sen. Jim Inhofe: NSA Æquilibriæx Sustainable Security Theses Ecology of Peace v. Near Term Extinction campaign.4

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES: International Court of Justice: Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project5 (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 International Legal Materials 162 206. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 01, 12 US Supreme Court: Craig v. Harney 331 U.S. 367 (1947) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 01 Jaffee v. Redmond 518 U.S. 1 (1996) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 01 Sierra Club v. Morton 405 U.S. 727 (1972) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 01 7th Circuit:

http://tygae.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/13-06-18_milint-earth-day-wyft-support-troops-oath_cert.pdf http://tygae.weebly.com/aex-eopgasm.html 5 issuu.com/js-ror/docs/970925_icj-weeramantry_husl 3 4

iii

The Voices for Choices v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company 339 F.3d 542 (7th Cir. 2003). .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 01 Official Publications: Bundeswehr (Sep 2010): Peak Oil: Security Policy Implications of Scarce Resources6; Bundeswehr. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. ..24 Bush, GW Snr (1986/02): Public Report of the Vice-President’s Task Force on Combatting Terrorism7, United States Government .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 Canadian Security Intelligence Service: Gizewski, Peter (Spring 1997): Environmental Scarcity and Conflict8, by Peter Gizewski, Project on Environment Population and Security, Peace and Conflict Studies Program, University of Toronto; Canadian Security Intelligence Service: Archived: Commentary No. 71. .. .. … .. .. .. ... .. ..24 White House: National Security Council (1974/04/24): National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests9, Cover Letter by Henry Kissinger .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 White House: National Security Council (1974/12/10): National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM 200): Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests10, Washington, DC, 227 pp. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 White House: National Security Council (1975/11/26): National Security Decision Memorandum 314: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests11, Washington, DC. 4 pp.; made public policy by Pres. Gerald Ford. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 White House: Nixon, R. (1969/07/18): Special Message to the Congress on Problems of Population Growth12, Public Papers of the Presidents, No. 271, p. 521, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives, Washington, DC, 1971. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. ..24 White House: Nixon, R (1970/03/16): Remarks of President Nixon on Signing Bill Establishing the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future13, White House. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 White House: Nixon, R. (1972/05/05): Statement About the Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future14, Public Papers for the Presidents, No. 142, p. 576, Office of Federal Register, National Archives, Washington, DC, 1974. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ..24 White House: Rockefeller Commission Report (1972/03/27): Population and the American Future: The Report of the Commission on Population Growth English: http://www.permaculture.org.au/files/Peak%20Oil_Study%20EN.pdf http://www.population-security.org/bush_report_on_terrorism/bush_report_on_terrorism_3.htm 8 http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/pblctns/cmmntr/cm71-eng.asp 9 issuu.com/js-ror/docs/740424_wh-nssm200 10 issuu.com/js-ror/docs/740424_wh-nssm200 11 www.population-security.org/12-CH4.html 12 http://www.population-security.org/10-CH2.html 13 http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2911 14 http://www.population-security.org/10-CH2.html 6 7

and the American Future15 (PDF16); a Signet Special Edition, W5219, The New American Library, Inc., 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, March, 1972 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 United Kingdom: Ministry of Defense: Development, Concepts and Doctrine Center (DCDC) (12 January 2010): Strategic Trends Programme: Global Strategic Trends - Out to 204017; Ministry of Defense .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 24 United Nations: (1974/08): World Population Plan of Action18 (PDF19); Adopted by consensus of the 137 countries represented at the UN World Population Conference at Bucharest, August 1974 .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. 24 UNEP: UNEP 2010 Annual Report20; UNEP .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...24 UNEP (2011) UN Water Policy Brief (PDF21) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 United States Army: Department of the Army: Dept. of Army (December 1994): Field Manual 100-23, Peace Operations22. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army . .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .24 Dept of the Army (25 July 2008): Subject: 2008 Army Modernization Strategy23; Department of the Army; Lt. General Stephen M.Speakes, Dep. Chief of Staff .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...24 United States Army (2001): US Army Posture Statement - FY 200224. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 United States Army: Murphy, R (2006/10/24): US Army Strategy of the Environment25, Office of the Dep. Asst. Sec. of the Army, Environment, Safety & Occup. Health: Assistant for Sustainability. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .24 United States Army & TRADOC (2012): US Army Unified Quest 2012 Fact Sheet26, Unified Quest 2012 is the Army Chief of Staff's annual Title 10 Future Study Plan (FSP). .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. ...24 United States Army: Strategic Studies Institute: Freier, Nathan (November 2008): Known Unknowns: Unconventional "Strategic Shocks" in Defense Strategy Development27; Strategic Studies Institute; US Army .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 24

www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm issuu.com/js-ror/docs/720327_rock-pop 17 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/33717/GST4_v9_Feb10.pdf 18 www.population-security.org/27-APP1.html 19 issuu.com/js-ror/docs/74_un-pop-actionplan 20 http://www.unep.org/annualreport/2010/pdfs/UNEP-AR-2010-FULL-REPORT.pdf 21 http://www.unwater.org/downloads/waterquality_policybrief.pdf 22 http://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/amd-us-archive/fm100-23(94).pdf 23 describes the arrival of a new "era of persistent conflict" due to competition for "depleting natural resources and overseas markets" fuelling "future resource wars over water, food and energy." http://downloads.army.mil/docs/08modplan/Army_Mod_Strat_2008.pdf 24 http://www.army.mil/aps/01/default.htm 25 www.cecer.army.mil/techreports/ERDC-CERL_TR-07-9/Session%20I/RichardMurphy.pdf 26 www.army.mil/article/68379/Unified_Quest_2012___Fact_Sheet/ 27 US Army's Strategic Studies Institute warned that a series of domestic crises could provoke large-scale civil unrest. The path to "disruptive domestic shock" could include traditional threats such as deployment of WMDs, alongside "catastrophic natural and human disasters" or "pervasive public health emergencies" coinciding with "unforeseen economic collapse." Such crises could lead to "loss of functioning political and legal order" leading to "purposeful 15 16

United States Army Command and General Staff College: David, MAJ William E (April 1996): Environmental Scarcity as a Cause of Violent Conflict28, USA Military Intelligence, School of Advanced Military Studies; United States Army Command and General Staff College. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 United States Army War College: Butts, Kent (25 April 1994): Environmental Security: A DOD Partnership for Peace29; US Army War College. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 24 Bush, Col BX (13 Mar 1997): Promoting Environmental Security during Contingency Operations30; US Army War College. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 Peters, R (1996): The Culture of Future Conflict31, US Army War College: Parameters: Winter 1995-96, pp. 18-27. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 Peters, Ralph (Summer 1997): Constant Conflict32, Parameters, US Army War College, pp.4-14 . .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 Ubbelohde, LTC Kurt F. (10 April 2000): Freshwater Scarcity in the Nile River Basin33, US Army War College. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 United States Department of Defence: Department of Defense: (Feb 2010): Quadrennial Defense Review34; Department of Defense .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .24 Defense Science Board Task Force (Oct 2011): Trends and Implications of Climate Change for National and International Security35; Dept. of Defense.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ..24 Department of Defense (Jan 2012): Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for the 21st Century Defense36. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. ..24 United States Joint Forces Command (2010/02/18): The Joint Operating Environment - 201037 (The JOE – 2010). .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24 U.S. Forest Service (Dec 2012): Report Predicts a Strain on Natural Resources Due to Rapid Population Growth38. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. ..24 World Bank (18 Nov 2012): Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4C Warmer World Must be Avoided39; World Bank .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. .. .. .. .. ..24

domestic resistance or insurgency... "DoD might be forced by circumstances to put its broad resources at the disposal of civil authorities to contain and reverse violent threats to domestic tranquility. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States. Further, DoD would be, by necessity, an essential enabling hub for the continuity of political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or disturbance." http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB890.pdf 28 http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA314878 29 Butts, Kent Hughes (25 April 1994): Environmental Security: A DoD Partnership for Peace http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB339.pdf 30 http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA326869 31 http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/parameters/Articles/1995/peters.htm 32 http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/Articles/97summer/peters.htm 33 http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA378148 34 "climate change, energy security, and economic stability are inextricably linked." http://www.defense.gov/QDR/QDR%20as%20of%2029JAN10%201600.pdf 35 http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2011/11/defense-science-panel-climate-a-national-securitythreat/1#.UdRFDjuBm7k and http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dsb/climate.pdf 36 http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf 37 www.jfcom.mil/newslink/storyarchive/2010/JOE_2010_o.pdf 38 http://www.fs.fed.us/news/2012/releases/12/report.shtml

Authorities: Bartlett, A (1994/09): Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth, and the Environment40, Population & Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, Sep 1994, pp. 5-35 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. 13 Bartlett, A (2000/09): Democracy Cannot Survive Overpopulation41, Population & Environment, Vol. 22, No. 1, pgs. 63-71. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. 13 Beehner Lionel (27 Apr 2007): The Effects of ‘Youth Bulge’ on Civil Conflicts42, Council on Foreign Relations Backgrounder.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..44 Brent, JG (2012): Humans: An Endangered Species43 (Jason Brent). .. .. .. ... .. .. 30-31 Clugston, C (2009): Sustainability Defined44 (WUA)… .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13 Clugston, Chris (2012): Scarcity: Humanity‘s Final Chapter: The realities, choices and likely outcomes associated with ever-increasing non-renewable natural resource scarcity45 (Booklocker.com) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13

Henrich Joseph, Heine Steven & Norenzayan Ara (05 March 2009): The Wierdest People in the World46; University of British Columbia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..13 Jones, Dan (25 June 2010): A WEIRD View of Human Nature Skews Psychologists’ Studies47; Science Magazine, Vol 328, pg.1627 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13 Kruger, Justin; David Dunning (1999). "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77.. .. …. .. 50 Leahy, E & Engelman R & Vogel C & Haddock S & Preston T (2003): The Shape of Things to Come: Why Age Structure Matters to a Safer More Equitable World48, Population Action Int’l .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. .. 44 Nagel Mago (2010): A Mathematical Model of Democratic Elections49. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4): Page No: 255-261. .. .. .. .. .. 50 McElvaine, RS (2001): Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History (McGraw-Hill). .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10-11 McElvaine, R (Undated): Eve’s Seed: Masculine Insecurity, Metaphor, and the Shaping of History50, Dept of History, Millsaps College. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..10-11

World Bank (18 Nov 2012): Climate Change Report Warms of Dramatically Warmer World This Century; World Bank http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/11/18/Climate-change-report-warns-dramatically-warmerworld-this-century and http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/11/17097815/turn-down-heat-4%C2%B0cwarmer-world-must-avoided 40 www.albartlett.org/articles/art_reflections_part_1.html 41 www.albartlett.org/articles/ee_democracy_survive_overpopulation.pdf 42 http://www.cfr.org/world/effects-youth-bulge-civil-conflicts/p13093 43 www.jgbrent.com 44 www.wakeupamerika.com/PDFs/Sustainability-Defined.pdf 45 www.nnrscarcity.com 46 http://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich/pdfs/Weird_People_BBS_final02.pdf 47 http://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich/pdfs/WEIRD%20in%20Science.pdf 48 http://populationaction.org/reports/the-shape-of-things-to-come-why-age-structure-matters-to-a-safer-moreequitable-world/ 49 http://www.maxwellsci.com/jp/abstract.php?jid=CRJSS&no=64&abs=07 50 www.scribd.com/doc/34104187/ 39

vii

Molyneux S (2010/04/17): Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement51 (Stefan Molyneux) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 19

Moseley Alexander: Just War Theory52, Internet Encyc of Philosophy .. … .. . . .42 Munford, LT (1999): When Does the Curiae Need an Amicus?, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 279, 280. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. …. …. 01 Murtaugh Paul A., Michael G. Schlax (2009): Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals53; University of Oregon.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 27 Muhrrteyn A (26 Feb 2013): Amicus in Kings County NY: Brooklyn Supreme Court54: Bernard Bey v Bernard and Vicky Manley .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .50 Norway v Breivik: Islam4UK's Anjem Choudari agrees with Breivik that Islam and Non-Islam are at War in Europe55 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. …24 Rain Liivoja. 2010. Chivalry without a Horse: Military Honour and the Modern Law of Armed Conflict56 submitted to the Proceedings of the Estonian National Defence College .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. … .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. 42 Sandbacka Carola (ed.) (1975): Cultural Imperialism and Cultural Identity. Transactions of the Finnish Anthropolological Society 2. Helsinki 1977.. .. .... .. .23 Sarmela, Matti: What is Cultural Imperialism?57; Univ of Helsinki.. .. .. .. .. .. ….. 23 Ting-Toomey, S. (1986). Conflict communication styles in Black and White subjective subcultures. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), Interethnic communication (pp. 75-88). Newbury Park: Sage. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 23 Turner Jonathan H. (1 September 2005). Sociology58. Prentice Hall. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .23

Watters Ethan (25 Feb 2013): Why Americans are the Weirdest People in the World59; Pacific Standard .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..13 Western John (1 June 1997): Outcast Cape Town, Univ of California Press ... .. .. .23 Wolchover Natalie (28 Feb 2012): People Aren't Smart Enough for Democracy to Flourish, Scientists Say60; Live Science .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 50 Zerzan John (13 April 2010): Patriarchy, Civilization, and the Origins of Gender61; Anarchist Library.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Žižek, Slavoj (1997): Multiculturalism or the cultural logic of multinational capitalism62, in: Razpol 10 - glasilo Freudovskega polja, Ljubljana .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .23

youtu.be/Xbp6umQT58A http://www.iep.utm.edu/justwar/ 53 http://blog.oregonlive.com/environment_impact/2009/07/carbon%20legacy.pdf 54 http://sqswans.weebly.com/ny-brooklyn-king-sc.html 55 http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2012/04/islam4uks-anjem-choudari-agrees-with.htm 56 http://works.bepress.com/rain_liivoja/15 57 www.kotikone.fi/matti.sarmela/culturimperialism.pdf 58 http://www.abebooks.com/9780131134966/Sociology-Turner-Jonathan-H-0131134965/plp 59 http://www.psmag.com/magazines/pacific-standard-cover-story/joe-henrich-weird-ultimatum-game-shaking-uppsychology-economics-53135/ 60 http://www.livescience.com/18706-people-smart-democracy.html 61 http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/john-zerzan-patriarchy-civilization-and-the-origins-of-gender 62 http://www.soc.aau.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/kbm/VoF/ 51 52

viii

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT: “We cannot regulate our interaction with any aspect of reality that our model of reality does not include.” - Stafford Beer, Brain of the Firm1 “Thou shalt not legislate, enforce or obey laws which enable citizen’s procreation or consumption to transgress ecological carrying capacity limits.” – MILINT Earth Day Æquilibriæx Sustainable Security Jurisprudence Decalogue Commandment. “It is increasingly plausible that the total social costs of growth (many of which go unaccounted) now exceed the measurable benefits. If so, the world has entered an era of uneconomic growth, growth that impoverishes (see Daly, 1999; Siegel, 2006).” - William Rees; What’s blocking Sustainability? Human nature, cognition and denial2 “Given current corporate practices, not one wildlife reserve, wilderness, or indigenous culture will survive the global market economy. We know that every natural system on the planet is disintegrating... There is no polite way to say that business is destroying the world.” - Paul Hawken, The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability, 1993, 3. “Kill bankers, not yourselves [or each other]” Panagiotaros, Member: Greece's Golden Dawn Party

[1]

Ilias

This Amicus Brief presents the Court with alternative3 important4 -- ‘search for

truth’5, avoid argument duplication6, speak on behalf of an unrepresented party’7, ‘present new ideas, arguments, theories, insights, facts and data’, and ‘present a unique perspective and specific information’8 -- Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence Sustainable Security legal arguments deemed too far reaching for emphasis by parties intent on winning their particular AnthroCorpocentric cases9.

Beer, Stafford (1981): Brain of the Firm; Second Edition (much extended), John Wiley, London and New York. Reprinted 1986, 1988. Translated into Russian. 2 Rees William (2010): Whats blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition and denial ; Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol6iss2/1001-012.rees.html 3 Munford, LT (1999): When Does the Curiae Need an Amicus?, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 279, 280. 4 Bruce J. Ennis, Effective Amicus Briefs, 33 CATH. U. L. REV. 603 (1984) “[A] common misconception about amicus briefs . . . is that [they] are not very important; that they are at best only icing on the cake. In reality, they are often the cake itself. Amicus briefs have shaped the judicial decisions in many more cases than is commonly realized.” 5 Jaffee v. Redmond 518 U.S. 1 (1996). 6 Craig v. Harney 331 U.S. 367 (1947) 7 Sierra Club v. Morton 405 U.S. 727 (1972): Justice William O’Douglas dissenting 8 The Voices for Choices v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company 339 F.3d 542 (7th Cir. 2003). 9 Smith, PM (1998): The Sometimes Troubled Relationship Between Courts and Their “Friends”, note 2, at 26 1

[2]

In considering a new – Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence – perspective The Opinion of

Weeramantry J10, advises to “follow in the path charted out by Grotius‘ that “it would be pity indeed if [the wealth of past experience from a variety of cultures] were left untapped merely because of attitudes of formalism which see such approaches as not being entirely de rigueur”. A court “needs to be multi-disciplinary, drawing from other disciplines .. such wisdom as may be relevant for its purpose”; since a court “cannot afford to be monocultural, especially where it is entering newly developing areas of law”. [3]

These California Prisoner Petitioner’s, like Michael Adebolajo and Michael

Adebowale11, Beate Zschape12, Anders Breivik13, Bradley (aka Chelsea Manning) and Edward Snowden14, Bernard Bey15 and Michael Dunn16, and many millions (if we consider historically, it would be billions) of others, are simply low-level left/right, white/black, Muslim/Christian Ethnic-Conflict foot-soldiers, of Civilized Patriarchy’s AnthroCorpocentric Flat Earth ‘Rule of Force’ social contract jurisprudence. [4]

A credible Committee should find that the constitutional and legislative Social

Contract entered into between the United Nations and National Governments around the world; and the social contracts entered into by National Governments around the world and their citizens, are founded on Taker Scarcity-Combatant Civilized Patriarchy AnthroCorpocentric Flat Earth ‘Rule of Force’ social contract jurisprudence; based upon deception and fraud, which does not meet the requirements of a fully informed consenting agreement. [5]

For the purposes of this Amicus Eco-Innocent and Scarcity-Combatant have the

following meanings: [5.1]

Taker Scarcity-Combatant: an individual/ who is/are not physically or

intellectually capable of (i) responsible procreation and/or consumption below carrying capacity limits and /or (ii) engaging in Voluntarist (fully informed consent) agreements.

ICJ: Weeramantry J in Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project http://tygae.weebly.com/united-kingdom.html 12 http://tygae.weebly.com/germany.html 13 http://ecofeminist-v-breivik.weebly.com/rh-court-records.html 14 http://tygae.weebly.com/united-states.html 15 http://sqswans.weebly.com/ny-brooklyn-king-sc.html 16 http://sqswans.weebly.com/fl-4th-judicial-crt.html 10 11

[5.2]

Leaver Eco-Innocent: an individual who is physically and intellectually

capable of (i) responsible procreation and consumption below carrying capacity limits and (ii) engaging in Voluntarist (fully informed consent) agreements. [5.3]

Taker Scarcity-Combatant Social Contracts: is any social contract

constitution that (A) provides its citizens the ‘Inalienable Right’ to Breed and Consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits; and (B) the Inalienable Right to Vote, without regard for ecological and egological literacy; but (C) demands that Citizens need a Licence to Own a Gun, a Licence to Drive a Car, a Licence to Practice Law, a television licence, a credit licence, a licence to earn a living, a university exemption licence, a licence to fish, a licence to hunt, a liquor licence, a business licence, a marriage licence, etc. [5.4]

Leaver

Eco-Innocent

Social

Contracts:

any

social

contract

constitution that is founded on CommonSism Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence which requires all of its citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits and only grants ecologically and egologically literate citizens’ licences to vote. [6]

Scarcity-Combatant International Treaty’s and Nation state constitutions –

frequently fraudulently legally labelled as ‘democracies’ (which if defined for the ignorant scarcity-combatant populace means: the legal imposed tyranny of the ecological and egological illiterate majority) – fail to clearly and simply disclose that they are founded upon Civilized Patriarchy AnthroCorpocentric Flat Earth ‘Rule of Force’ principles: (a) provide their scarcity-combatants the inalienable right to breed and consume without regard for ecological carrying capacity limits; which sociopolitically manifests as a Control of Reproduction Human Factory Farming Breeding War Economy racket17 (PDF18) and a Control of Consumption Global Corporate Cultural Imperialism racket19 (PDF20), (b) these Breeding and Consumption War rackets consequently violate carrying capacity limits, resulting in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict and resource wars; (c) that ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict; (d) inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict http://tygae.weebly.com/ss-defcon-theses.html http://issuu.com/tygae/docs/milint_eop_ssd_c-rep 19 http://tygae.weebly.com/ss-defcon-theses.html 20 http://issuu.com/tygae/docs/milint_eop_ssd_c-cons 17 18

misery; as opposed to demanding their Duhmockery leaders implement an EcoInnocent International and National Social Contracts in accordance with the Ecology of Peace Commandment: “Thou shalt not legislate, enforce, or obey laws which enable citizens procreation or consumption to transgress cultural carrying capacity limits.” [7]

Speaking frankly (as opposed to the political correct bullshit the public legal PR

parlance of Duhmockery): The Prisoner Petitioners and their families are (1) ignorant scarcity-combatant members of surplus fodder

(vote, cannon, or otherwise) slave

(brood sow, sperm donor, debtor, etc) populations; (2) Oblivious of the reality that the foundation stones of Scarcity-Combatant International and National Social Contracts are in fact, not clarity, informed consent, fairness and justice; but in fact ambiguity, plausible deniability, coercion, arbitrariness and deception, etc; (3) Finally a plausible cause of the Petitioner’s ignorance being that a significant number of their Scarcity-Combatant leaders support the continued implementation of ScarcityCombatant social contracts, because they subjectively believe (perhaps inaccurately) that the majority of their scarcity-combatant subjects subconsciously prefer or consciously insist on being lied to and deceived; and would not take the opportunity to prove that they appreciate being provided with constructive criticism from their leaders about how to gain their release by committing to supporting the implementation of an Eco-Innocent social contract. [7.1]

Consequently Amici recommends that Petitioners should (A) engage in an

investigative enquiry to determine how many of California’s prisoners (county jail, general population and solitary confinement) would commit to supporting California’s legislature to implement an Eco-Innocent social contract constitution of clarity, informed consent, fairness and justice based upon ecological resource carrying capacity reality and Voluntarist principles; for California; by (B) providing the Respondents and United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; in this matter; with said Petitioner’s signed MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Citizen Oaths (which must include a paragraph that specifies the Petitioner’s agreement to be surgically sterilized, prior to being released by CDC). MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Whistleblower/Activist Oath: [8]

Please find attached Amici’s MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Whistleblower

/ Activist Oath, submitted to the Walk Your Footprint Talk to Support the Troops’ 4

Military Advisory Board (“MAB”), copies sent to: Gen. Keith Alexander, National Security Agency; James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence and Lisa Monaco, Asst Att. General for National Security, National Security Division, Department of Justice. [9]

The oath requires Amici to maintain her Walk my Eco-footprint Talk to Support

the Troops to below the following Carrying Capacity limits21: (procreate one child, to consume below 1 gha; procreate no children, to consume below 20 gha.); and legally authorizes the MAB to authorize Amici’s assassination should she violate the oath, by procreating or consuming above said carrying capacity limits.

STATEMENT OF FACTS [10]

California United States Prisoners in Segregation filed said Petition to

the

United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; on behalf of approximately 4,000 California prisoners who are being detained in isolated segregation units for indefinite periods or determinate periods of many years solely because they have been identified as members of gangs or found to have associated with a gang. Allegedly the policy that has resulted in their prolonged detention does not require that they have actually engaged in any misconduct or illegally activity, or that they even planned to engage in any misconduct or illegal activity. [10.1]

California Prisoner Petitioners include: Walter Coto; Todd Ashker;

Christopher Flores; Alfred Sandoval; Mutope Duguma s/n James Darren Crawford; Javier Zubiate; S. Heshima Denham; Scott Stoner; Victor Cantero; Synrico J'Marcus Rodgers; Roberto Campa Lopez; Philforman, Michael Reed Dorrough; Robbie Riva; Michael Spencer; GR; DC; Donald Lee Moran Jr; Carlos Roberto Robledo; Derk Carbajal; BI; and Richard Satterfield. [10.2]

Petitioner organizations include California Prison Focus; Center for Human

Rights and Constitutional Law; Families to Amend California's Three Strikes; Fair Chance Project; California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement; Justice for Families; The Real Cost of Prisons Project; American Friends Service Committee; Community Futures Collective; Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights; California Prison Moratorium Project; Legal Services for Prisoners with Children;

http://sqswans.weebly.com/guerrylla-laws.html

Disability Rights Legal Center; Disability Rights California; League of United LatinAmerican Citizens

ÆQUILIBRIAEX JURISPURDENCE INTEREST OF AMICI [11]

Amici is an adult Radical Honoursty Ecofeminist Wild Law Sustainable Security

practicing paralegal, resident in George, Southern Cape, RSA. [12]

Amici is amicably separated (filed for divorce) from African American prisoner

Demian Emile Johnson, who has been incarcerated in the California Dept. of Corrections, on a sentence of 15-to-life for felony murder, since 1982. Mr. Johnson was detained in isolated segregation and denied parole; for similar allegations of gang association; but such labels were removed by California Correctional Authorities subsequent to various evidentiary submissions of them being erroneous. [13]

Amici has political motivated criminal convictions for Terrorism22; Malicious

Damage to State Property23: and Contempt in Facie Curiae. Her European ‘Totalitarian Agriculture Scarcity Combatant Parties to Conflict’ Progenitor citizens from France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom travelled to South Africa as a means to escape the resource scarcity and ideological and religious conflict consequences of Totalitarian Agriculture breeding and consumption war practices; occurring in Europe at the time; as economic, religious and military cannon fodder on behalf of European “Colonial Empire” decision-making, to find only the Bushman as indigenous natives. They arrived as “settler” farmers, soldiers, medical personnel, religious and political administrators, frequently on behalf of, and for the benefit of European Political and Financial Imperial Interests. [14]

She is the co-founder of Eco-Innocent Æquilibriæx24 Jurisprudence, Guerrylla

Law25 and CommonSism26; and a paralegal activist for MILINT Earth Day27. On 18 June 2002 (Phi Day and President Mbeki’s 60th birthday) she made a bomb threat to the P.W. Botha International airport in George and then turned herself into the Police, based upon the political necessity of exposing SA’s Truth and Reconciliation Fraud (particularly the relationship between overpopulation and terrorism and the media’s coverup of overpopulation-environment-terrorism connections). She was sentenced to two years correctional supervision. 23 She broke about half a dozen windows in George Women’s prison and set the prison on fire on 19 April 2003, when Prison authorities refused to recognize her hungerstrike. 24 Æquilibriæx is derived from æquus (equal), libra/æ (balance), libri (books), lex (law). Æquilibriæx Jurisprudence, i.e. Equal & balanced Eco/Anthropocentric law; occurs as Equilibriæx Jurisprudence which adheres to the laws of nature / ecology, which manifests as all species living in carry capacity harmony with another; and Aquilibriæx Jurisprudence adheres to laws of human nature, which manifests as fully informed consent harmony between all human members of society. http://tygae.weebly.com/aequilibriaex.html 25 Guerrylla Laws (A) simply and very specifically clarify the difference between the consumption and procreation behaviour of an Unsustainable Taker (Scarcity Combatant) vs a Sustainable Leaver (Eco-Innocent); and are (B) used in courts to (a) provide legal rights and socio-political rewards of recognition to Sustainable Leaver's for their intra and inter-species harmony lifestyle choices and practices; (b) confront Taker Scarcity Combatants of their Breeding / 22

ARGUMENT: Æquilibriæx CommonSism & Civilized Patriarchy Legal Plantation Reality For any event in the world that any human being participates in, there are always at least three levels from which to report the event, one level of description alone and two levels of abstraction from factual experience. There is what occurred, the interpretation story made about what occurred, and the meaning made out of the story about what occurred. The most abstract level, the meaning made out of the story that occurred, is the sales pitch that most of us are calling reality. What most of us call reality is just a story about reality or a story we have about the story.” – Brad Blanton, Practicing Radical Honesty (amended) “What is history? The lie that everyone agrees on...” – Voltaire

Reality: Factual – Interpretive – Ideological (Meaning Making): [15]

We are each individually responsible for cutting ourselves off from factual reality

by consciously and unconsciously substituting our interpretations of reality and ideological reality for factual reality. Most of humans spend most of their conscious lives in ideological reality (whether based upon religious, ethnic or class based ideological reality), occasionally venturing into interpretive reality, and severely deceiving themselves they are consciously living in factual reality, or engaging in discourse from a factual reality foundational perspective. [16]

Amici’s perspective to the three stages of reality is based upon Radical Honesty

culture principles, as follows: [16.1]

FACTUAL REALITY: is founded upon FACTS: what happened, who said

what, who did what to whom, how and when. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. Consumption combatant behaviours aggravation of Scarcity induced socio-economic problems, by means of aggravated legal penalties, in accordance to their 'Taker Scarcity Combatant' status. 26 Common Sense Guerrylla Laws for a Sustainable Commons – asserts that a majority of society's problems - crime, violence, unemployment, poverty, inflation, food shortages, political instability, vanishing species, garbage and pollution urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, energy and non-renewable resources (NNR) depletion and scarcity are symptoms of Ecological Overshoot, resulting from the Scarcity-Combatant AnthroCorpoCentric Consumptionist Left and Right Wing's war against nature, and the absence of Ecocentric Jurisprudence combined with the failures of AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence. http://sqswans.weebly.com/guerrylla-law.html 27 http://tygae.weebly.com/

[16.2]

INTERPRETIVE REALITY: is founded upon the interpretation of those

facts (i.e. motives, causes, etc); commonly referred to as the 'why' behind the whom, when, how and what. When we consciously or unconsciously think about ‘why’ the whom we observed did or said what and how and when;, we enter into subjective interpretive reality. A.

Subjective Interpretive Reality: When our ‘why’ is influenced by our personal racial, religious, ideological or cultural experience or attachment to any particular ideological meaning making (religious, racial or otherwise); then our thinking about ‘why’ is a process of interpreting interpretations representing representations—that drags us further away from the factual reality data. Put simply, it is dealing with used second-hand information. It is like relying on 7th or 15th person in a game of Chinese Whispers28, for data, as opposed to going to the first person source.

Objective

Interpretive

Reality:

The

least

simplest

degree

interpretation, is generally speaking the most reliable and objective. [16.3]

IDEOLOGICAL REALITY: is founded upon the ideological meaning

making story. Meaning Making ideological stories are based upon collective – racial, religious, ideological, class or culture – tribal identity moral interpretations of a collection of historical events, frequently using second-or-ten-thousand-hand moral interpretations, to generate a moral tribal meaning making story (history). A.

A human or animal body cannot function if it consumes food and liquid, and fails to process and subsequently discard its food-waste. Prior to the development of the first sanitations systems, in prehistoric Middle East, crowded cities experienced a surplus of indisposed and processed sewage, leading to unhygienic conditions and disease; what current plumbers who observer a sewer drain clogging, refer to as a plumbing emergency.

Similarly an ego-identity mind that fails to discard, or becomes too emotionally or identity attached to any particular tribal identity moral interpretations of a collection of historical events, effectively experiences a mental mind-sewer drain clogging, a philosophical failure of critical thinking and noticing emergency.

CommonSism Facts:

[17]

[17.1]

The earth is not flat

[17.2]

Earth's resources are not infinite.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_whispers

[18]

CommonSism Interpretations and Ideology: [18.1]

Humans and animals consume natural resources for survival.

[18.2]

Humans and animals procreate and socialize in tribes ranging from two to

families, to groups of families. [18.3]

Totalitarian agriculture describes the behaviour of humans who violate

their original indigenous tribal territoryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s by choosing to engage in the production of surplus humans (population growth) or surplus food production (economic growth). [18.4]

When any tribe of humans overbreed and/or overconsume the natural

resources in their perceived tribal territory; they travel beyond their tribal territory to go and find resources they have over-consumed and degraded. [18.5]

When any tribe overbreeds and overconsumes and goes in search of new

resources for that which it has degraded or overconsumed, and it enters another tribes territory, then conflict occurs (from economic, political to physical, an organized violence warfare). [18.6]

To limit inter-tribal territorial resource acquisition conflict, all tribes must

agree to limit procreation and consumption to their tribal territory ecological carrying capacity limits. [18.7]

If for example there are five hundred tribes on a particular island; and

seven agree to limit their procreation and consumption to tribal territorial limits; and four hundred and ninety-three tribes refuse; the seven tribes tribal survival options are: (a) declare war on the four hundred and ninety-three tribes if they believe they have a reasonable chance of success to exterminate them; or (b) engage in a breeding and/or consumption war to strengthen their military capacity to the point where they believe they have a reasonable chance of success to exterminate the refuseniks. [18.8]

Simplistically: Every single battle between two groups of racial, religious,

ethnic, or ideological warriors, engaged in organized violence, since the advent of totalitarian agriculture, was a result of one or both of those tribes having overbred and or overconsumed, and engaging in resource thieving into another tribes territory. [19]

CommonSism Questions: [19.1]

Is the earth flat, or not? Are resources infinite, or not?

[19.2]

If you agree the earth is not flat and resources are not infinite; when do you

agree to support restricting everyone's breeding and consuming to ecological carrying capacity limits; and if you refuse to do so; does it matter why you do so, or is it only relevant who objects, when and how?

Civilized Patriarchy: “Civilization, very fundamentally, is the history of the domination of nature and of women. Patriarchy means rule over women and nature. Women and nature are universally devalued by the dominant paradigm and who cannot see what this has wrought? Ursula Le Guin gives us a healthy corrective to Paglia’s dismissal of both: “Civilized Man says: I am Self, I am Master, all the rest is other — outside, below, underneath, subservient. I own, I use, I explore, I exploit, I control. What I do is what matters. What I want is what matter is for. I am that I am, and the rest is women and wilderness, to be used as I see fit.”” - John Zerzan, Patriarchy, Civilization, and the Origins of Gender29, Anarchist Library “Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, to be sure, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Marx‘s famous formulation must be revised: The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of struggles based on the division of our species into two sexes, jealousies emanating from this division, exaggerations of the differences between the sexes, misunderstandings about sexual reproductive power, and metaphors derived from sex. Together, these closely related matters constitute the most important, but largely neglected, set of motive forces in human history. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production.” – Robert 29

http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/john-zerzan-patriarchy-civilization-and-the-origins-of-gender

McElvaine, History.

Eve’s

Seed:

Biology,

the

Sexes

and

the

Course

“In the game of patriarchy, women are not the opposing team; they are the ball.” - Anita Sarkeesian

[20]

A system of society or government, is Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates

(a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; with total disregard for implementing procreation and consumption limits in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limitations; (c) for the almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations. [21]

Consequently a legal, political or social system is Patriarchal to the extent of its

(a) failure to provide automatic equal legal personhood and rights to women, culture’s based on non-patriarchal principles, nature and animal and plant species; (b) disregard for the objective and scientific breed and consume below carrying capacity truth of the laws of nature/ecology; and (c) disregard for the laws of human nature; when they contradict the AnthroCorpocentric – breeding and consumption war – objectives of the holders of subjective AnthroCorpocentric Truth. [22]

A society has violent Patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives, to

the extent that: [22.1]

its socio-political status symbols involve breeding war, consumption war

and violent warrior mythology: (a) breeding war procreation above carrying capacity: i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood virility status, which are based on the man breeding a family above carrying capacity levels; (b) consumption war consuming above carrying capacity; i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood intelligence/virility status, which are based upon the man consuming above carrying capacity levels, to demonstrate his ‘large consumption penis’; (c) warrior mythology, where violent men are rewarded with ‘freedom fighter’ or ‘soldier’ socio-political status symbol medals and awards; particularly if the warrior mythology censors and ignores information to educate the culture’s members, that scarcity induced resource war violence can be avoided by the culture’s members choosing to breed and consume below carrying capacity levels. A culture which teaches a purely defensive warrior mythology; i.e. based purely on defense of its landbase and resources, i.e. which educate the members of the culture to avoid overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity inducing lifestyle’s within its culture, and hence does not engage in patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives would not be considered a patriarchal culture.

[22.2]

Its religious, political and corporate leaders (a) endorse patriarchal

objectification and sexualized concepts of ‘beauty’, which demean and vilify all women who do not meet those ‘beauty’ requirements; where a woman’s value is not based on her honesty, character and integrity, but upon how well she is able to market and trade her sexuality for physical and economic safety and security, and (b) avoid addressing the overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity induced root causes of most direct and indirect causes of conflict: from murder, rape, suicide, homeless, unemployment, courts, police, prisons, mental illness, mental institutions, because cumulatively they serve as socio-political conflict pressure cookers to sociopsychologically pressure women to (i) purchase safety and security by trading sexual favours from men, for physical and economic safety and security; (ii) conform to civilized patriarchy’s expectation that she behave as her partners brood sow and/or sexual socio-economic status symbol bimbo accessory, to breed/consume above carrying capacity, to thereby (iii) aggravate scarcity induced violence, particularly against lower class men and women.

A Credible Æquilibriæx Judicial System: Law is the system of rules of conduct established by the sovereign government of a society to correct wrongs, maintain the stability of political and social authority, and deliver justice.

[23]

A ‘credible’ judicial system is one which accurately applies the relevant natural

or scientific laws, to attain a specific related required result of inter-human and intra-species harmony and balance. [24]

A ‘credible’ judicial system regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature

and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; by restricting procreation and consumption in accordance to (i) the laws of nature/ecology, recognizing that a healthy ecological environment, with due regard for regulating human procreation and resource utilization behaviour in accordance with the carrying capacity laws of sustainability is a sine qua non30 for all other

30 “Environmental Protection as a Principle of International Law : The protection of the environment is likewise a vital part of contemporary human rights doctrine, for it is a sine qua non for numerous human rights such as the right to health and the right to life itself. It is scarcely necessary to elaborate on this, as damage to the environment can impair and undermine all; the human rights spoken of in the Universal Declaration and other human rights instruments.” -- Opinion of Weeramantry J in the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) (1998) 37 International Legal Materials 162 206.

constitutional rights31; and (B) the laws of human nature; where the relevant disputing parties cultural, religious, and ideological laws of human nature32, are applied to achieve the greatest possible level of intra-species harmony and balance. [24.1]

For example: The gender balanced Mosuo in South West China who have

no rape (not even a word in their language for rape, because it does not exist), no murder, no suicide and no unemployment.

Civilized Patriarchy’s Innocence for Sale Indulgence Legal Matrix: “Corporations are a Frankenstein monster which States have created by their corporation laws.” - Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, 1916

[25]

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix Reality doctrine -- the Inalienable ‘Right to

Breed and Consume, but you need a License to Own a Gun, a License to Drive a Car, a License to Practice Law, a television license, a credit license, a license to earn a living, a university exemption license, a license to fish, a license to hunt, a liquor license, a business license, a marriage license, in some U.S. states, five year olds, even need to get a license to run a lemonade stand on their front lawn -hypocritically referred to as the ‘rule-of-law’ is a legal world of lawyers, politicians and priests, who prefer to negligently ignore, plausibly deny, or socio-psycho-phallicly benefit from the conquer-and-multiply and divide and conquer control over the means of human reproduction and consumption. It is a Matrix reality, of legal, political and religious indulgence salesmen. [26]

It is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before

Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation. [27]

In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were

entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.

Democracy Cannot Survive Overpopulation, Al Bartlett, Ph.D., Population & Environment, Vol. 22, No. 1, Sep 2000, pgs. 63-71; Bartlett (1994/09): Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth, and the Environment, Population & Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, Sep 1994, pp. 5-35; Clugston, C (2009): Sustainability Defined (WakeUpAmerika) 32 Henrich Joseph, Heine Steven, Norenzayan Ara (05 March 2009); Watters, Ethan (25 Feb 2013); Jones, Dan (25 June 2010)

[28]

In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind

obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere Commons surplus cannon fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’. [29]

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix ‘AnthroCorpocentric law’ is based upon Flat

Earth ‘jurisprudence’, as per the demands of those capable of purchasing Flat Earth legislation indulgences which make their ecologically – breeding/consumption war -criminal acts, to be deemed as ‘legal/lawful’ conduct by the Legal Matrix Bishops: lawyers, prosecutors and Judges. [30]

It is a Matrix world of legal indulgence salesmen; who -- ‘Contempt in Facie

Curiae’ -- demand the public’s sycophantic submissive obedience; for their supposed superior intellectual Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret which of us mere Commons surplus cannon and vote fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Thieving, Conquering, Murdering and Culling Acts of Un/Lawfulness: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger; The Final Days33, by Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein

[31]

Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by

joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen. [32]

In this Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security

conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma: [32.1]

To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’

and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence 33

Chapter 14, pp. 194-195

salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape. [33]

One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed

for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts. [34]

Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or

unlawful order? [35]

The ‘Inalienable Right to Breed’ Matrix Reality conquer-and-multiply indulgence

salesmen, with their specious justifications, and nightmare of Legal Matrix reality generated bureaucratic stare-decisis cryptic rules and statutes, of course! "I don't know what you mean by 'glory,' " Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't—till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!' " "But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected. "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master— that's all." -- Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

Civilized Patriarchy: The Legal Plantation Mastah’s of ‘Relevance’: [36]

The question in a civilized patriarchy court is only concerned with who is the

master of one word: ‘relevance’. [37]

Any question or answer that exposes civilized patriarchy’s Legal Matrix system

for what it is; a system far more corrupt than the Catholic Church’s Innocence Indulgences for Sale religious matrix, is simply deemed as ‘irrelevant’. [38]

What is relevant?:

[39]

It is relevant that civilized patriarchy’s penis constitutions human factory

farming rights to breed and consume, is to be master —that's all.

THE IRRELEVANT SCARCITY-COMBATANT TAKER SOCIAL CONTRACT: Our Flat Earth Social Contract â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Rule of Forceâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Ideological Prison: [40]

Any individual born into a tribe on a planet where the international law is

founded upon flat earth 'rule of force' social contact jurisprudence (inalienable right to breed and consume above carrying capacity limits) is born -- consciously or unconsciously -- into one or other form of honest or dishonest ideological and/or physical prison slavery. [41]

When the international law social contract allows any one or more nations,

cultures, religions or races to procreate or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; they are endorsing that culture's right to engage in imperialist conquer and culling of other cultures, races and religions, for their resources.

[42]

When the international law social contract allows tribes to overbreed and

overconsume, then if or when a tribe breeds or consumes above its ecological carrying capacity limits, it must go elsewhere to find the resources it has over-consumed and degraded. If all of the ‘elsewhere’ is populated by other tribes, then economic, political or military resource conflict occurs. When many tribes overconsume or overbreed (above their ecological carrying capacity limits) this results in economic, political or military conflict between the tribes. For 2000 years the 'rule of law’ and consequently warfare has simply been the 'rule of force'. Whomever was the strongest in terms of capital for military intelligence and/or technology or had the greatest number of cannon fodder to sacrifice on the battlefield won. The 'rule of law' means and has meant since the beginning of totalitarian agriculture, the rule of force. Every tribe from every race, religion and culture for the past 2000 years who has overconsumed or overbred has engaged in conquering and culling of other tribes. [43]

As explained by military geopolitical scientist Homer Lea: Effectively this

results in everyone on that planet whose tribal territory comes into 'contact' with another tribe expanding their tribal territory; being forced into a form of breeding or consumption war slavery to survive and defend themselves, their family and property. [44]

Homer Lea: “Investigation shows that whenever two nations have become

engaged in warfare they have been advancing on converging lines of (resource acquisition

for

growing

consumption

procreation)

self-interest

and

aggrandizement. When the contact takes place, the struggle for supremacy, or even survival is at hand. This inevitable hour is approximately fixed and determined by the angles of convergence plus the sum of the relative (consumption / breeding war) speed by which the nations are moving along their respective lines. Thus it is that, when the angle of (breeding / consumption war) convergence of both or even one of the nations is acute and the speed or progress along one or both of the converging lines correspondingly great, war results in a few years or decades.” [45]

When your tribe's procreation or consumption territorial expansion comes into

contact with another tribe's territory; then organized conflict not only between the two tribes, but internally within both tribes, is the result. The leaders of the respective tribes, either implement (i) international law limiting all tribes procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits (CommonSism); or (ii) if unable to do so, lacking sufficient support for such international jurisprudence consider it necessary to resort to coercion towards their own lower ranked tribal members to coercively psychologically bribe, deceive or coerce them into contributing

towards the tribes breeding and consumption warfare practices. Coercion includes breeding (i) cannon fodder to provide the military with many young bodies that can be easily recruited to defend the tribe; and (ii) economic consumer and production fodder; to provide the leaders with greater capital resource accumulation (excess production), to support the violent enforcement class – the police and military – and the propagandizing class – the priests, intellectuals, and artists. Brief Overview of Birth Certificate Licensing Slavery: [46]

Southern slavery was legally honest: the slaves were called slaves, the law

clearly stated they were owned by their master; and no slave was in any doubt about the fact that he was considered a slave (owned as property by his/her master). [47]

Honest legal slavery may have been abolished, at least in some countries (not

all); but it was simply replaced with dishonest covert -- using other legal abstract terms such as for example 'democracy' (tyranny of the ecologically and egological illiterate majority) -- legal slavery; such as breeding and consumption war debtslavery; and for many ideological tribal slavery. One of the forms of current covert legal slavery being debt slavery, where a nation’s corporate banking elite simply consider citizens lifetime labour and tax revenues to be ‘collateral’ in their debt negotiations; and when imprisoned their lives are effectively considered ‘collateral damage’ profits, via prisons for profit. [48]

Once a state has registered a birth document with the U.S. Department of

Commerce, the Department notifies the Treasury Department, which takes out a loan from the Federal Reserve. The Treasury uses the loan to purchase a bond (the Fed holds a purchase money security interest in the bond) from the Department of Commerce, which invests the sale proceeds in the stock or bond market. The Treasury Department then issues Treasury securities in the form of Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills using the bonds as surety for the new securities. [49]

This cycle is based on the future tax revenues of the legal person whose name

appears on the Birth Certificate. This also means that the bankrupt, corporate U.S. can guarantee to the purchasers of their securities the lifetime labor and tax revenues of every citizen of the United States/American with a Birth Certificate as collateral for payment. This device is initiated simply by converting the lawful, true name of the child into a legal, juristic name of a person.

[50]

Legally, you are considered to be a slave or indentured servant to the various

Federal, State and local governments via your STATE-issued and STATE-created Birth Certificate in the name of your all-caps person. Birth Certificates are issued so that the issuer can claim exclusive title to the legal person created thereby. [51]

Excerpts: Birth Certificate Truth34: Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and

Vatican Canon Law, of the Roman Canon Law foundation for birth certificate slavery. | You don't own yourself; the Federal Reserve does35 | US Citizens & Their Property Collateral for US Debt36 | Chronology of Debt Slavery legislation: 1776 present: including US citizens as 'enemies of the state'37 [52]

Prisons for Profit:

Catherine Austin Fitts: Dillon Read and Co. Inc. & the

Aristocracy of Prison Stock Profits38 | ACLU: Banking on Bondage: Private Prisons and Mass Incarceration (2001 Report)39 . Earth: The Human Factory Farming Slavery Planet: [53]

From Stephan Molyneus40: It is essential to understand the reality of the world:

When you look at a map of the world, you are not looking at countries, but farms; where state capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism, democracy are simply livestock management approaches. [54]

The problem with the â&#x20AC;&#x153;state as servantâ&#x20AC;? thesis is that it is historically completely

false, both empirically and logically. The idea that states were voluntarily invented by citizens to enhance their own security is utterly untrue. [55]

Before governments, in tribal times, human beings could only produce what they

consumed -- there was no excess production of food or other resources. Thus, there was no point owning slaves, because the slave could not produce any excess that could be stolen by the master. If a horse pulling a plow can only produce enough additional food to feed the horse, there is no point hunting, capturing and breaking in a horse.

http://macquirelatory.com/Birth%20Certificate%20Truth.htm http://www.viewzone.com/collateralx.html 36 http://henrymakow.com/us-citizens-property-collatera.html 37 http://usa-the-republic.com/revenue/true_history/Chap8.html 38 http://www.dunwalke.com/ 39 https://www.aclu.org/prisoners-rights/private-prisons 40 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P772Eb63qIY 34

[56]

However, when agricultural improvements allowed for the creation of excess

crops, suddenly it became highly advantageous to own human beings. When cows began to provide excess milk and meat, owning cows became worthwhile. [57]

The earliest governments and empires were in fact a ruling class of slave

hunters, who understood that because human beings could produce more than they consumed, they were worth hunting, capturing, breaking in – and owning. [58]

The earliest Egyptian and Chinese empires were in reality human farms, where

people were hunted, captured, domesticated and owned like any other form of livestock. Due to technological and methodological improvements, the slaves produced enough excess that the labor involved in capturing and keeping them represented only a small subset of their total productivity. The ruling class – the farmers – kept a large portion of that excess, while handing out gifts and payments to the brutalizing class – the police, slave hunters, and general sadists – and the propagandizing class – the priests, intellectuals, and artists. [59]

This situation continued for thousands of years, until the 16-17th centuries,

when again massive improvements in agricultural organization and technology created the second wave of excess productivity. The enclosure movement re-organized and consolidated farmland, resulting in 5-10 times more crops, creating a new class of industrial workers, displaced from the country and huddling in the new cities. This enormous agricultural excess was the basis of the capital that drove the industrial revolution. [60]

The Industrial Revolution did not arise because the ruling class wanted to free

their serfs, but rather because they realized how additional “liberties” could make their livestock astoundingly more productive. When cows are placed in very confining stalls, they beat their heads against the walls, resulting in injuries and infections. Thus farmers now give them more room -- not because they want to set their cows free, but rather because they want greater productivity and lower costs. The next stop after “free range” is not “freedom.” [61]

The rise of state capitalism in the 19th century was actually the rise of “free

range serfdom.” Additional liberties were granted to the human livestock not with the goal of setting them free, but rather with the goal of increasing their productivity. Of course, intellectuals, artists and priests were – and are – well paid to conceal this reality.

[62]

The great problem of modern human livestock ownership is the challenge of

“enthusiasm.” State capitalism only works when the entrepreneurial spirit drives creativity and productivity in the economy. However, excess productivity always creates a larger state, and swells the ruling classes and their dependents, which eats into the motivation for additional productivity. Taxes and regulations rise, state debt (future farming) increases, and living standards slow and decay. Depression and despair began to spread, as the reality of being owned sets in for the general population. [63]

The solution to this is additional propaganda, antidepressant medications,

superstition, wars, moral campaigns of every kind, the creation of “enemies,” the inculcation

patriotism,

collective

fears,

paranoia

about

“outsiders”

and

“immigrants,” and profitable race, religion and culture slave-stock culling wars. [64]

Citizens are allowed certain liberties – limited property ownership, movement

rights, freedom of association and occupation – not because your government approves of these rights in principle – since it constantly violates them – but rather because “free range livestock” is so much cheaper to own and so more productive. [65]

It is important to understand the reality of ideologies. State capitalism,

socialism, communism, fascism, democracy – these are all livestock management approaches. [66]

You are also kept on the farm through licensing. The most productive livestock

are the professionals, so the rulers fit them with an electronic dog collar called a “license,” which only allows them to practice their trade on their own farm. [67]

To further create the illusion of freedom, in certain farms, the livestock are

allowed to choose between a few farmers [politicians/political parties] that the investors present. At best, they are given minor choices in how they are managed. They are never given the choice to shut down the farm, and be truly free. [68]

Government schools are indoctrination pens for livestock. They train children to

“love” the farm, and to fear true freedom and independence, and to attack anyone who questions the brutal reality of human ownership. Furthermore, they create jobs for the intellectuals that state propaganda so relies on. Conclusion: Slavery Freedumb vs Responsible Freedom options:

[69]

This rule of Breeding & Consumption war Slavery Freedumb 'rule of force/law'

can either continue -- and since the world is now in serious ecological overshoot -become massively aggravated, meaning serious inter and intra-tribal organized violence conflict between races, classes, religions and cultures; that will make the civil war in Syria seem like a day at the beach; or the world's cultures, religions and races can choose to adopt a new system of responsible (ecologically literate breeding and consumption) freedom international law, where they all choose to practice responsible freedom. [70]

Generally speaking the two extreme versions of defining freedom are. [70.1]

CommonSism Responsible Freedom: to choose to be responsible by

choosing to breed and consume below carrying capacity limits; to benefit from the resource abundance consequences. [70.2]

Slavery Consequences Freedumb: the freedumb to choose to avoid

personal responsibility for breeding and consuming below carrying capacity limits; by denying personal responsibility for the resource war thieving organized violence consequences of collective slavery freedumb breeding and consuming decisionmaking. [71]

The consequences of Slavery Freedumb: organized violence conquer and culling

racism, sexism, nationalism, socialism, capitalism, nazism, islamism, zionism, corporatism, stalinism, etc; as people choose to join one or other ideological, religious, racial or cultural tribe to engage in resource war thieving to accumulate more resources to grow their tribe to enable it to protect itself from another tribes organized violence resource war thieving. [72]

So the choices facing humanity are: [72.1]

Slavery Freedumb Organized Violence on Steroids: organized rule of

force violence conquer and culling racism, sexism, nationalism, socialism, capitalism, nazism, islamism, zionism, corporatism, stalinism, etc on crack-cocaine steroids; [72.2]

CommonSism

Responsible

Voluntarist

Association

Freedom:

implementing ecologically literate national and international law based upon ecological carrying capacity limits, where all tribes are required to implement legislation to reduce and once attained maintain their procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits. [73]

The leaders of the respective nations, either implement: 22

[73.1]

national bilateral self-defence treaties or international law limiting all

nations procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits (CommonSism); or [73.2]

if unable to do so, (lacking sufficient support and commitment to the

implementation of such a ecological carrying capacity social contract from other nations elite’s, or elite’s within their own nation or their followers); consider it necessary to resort to divide and conquer coercion towards their own lower ranked tribal members to coercively psychologically bribe, deceive or coerce them into contributing towards the tribes breeding and consumption warfare practices. Coercion includes breeding (i) cannon fodder to provide the military with many young bodies that can be easily recruited to defend the tribe; and (ii) economic consumer and production fodder; to provide the leaders with greater capital resource accumulation (excess production), to support the ‘rule of force’ enforcement class – the police and military – and the propagandizing class – the priests, intellectuals, and artists. Flat Earth Jurisprudence and Ecological Overshoot induced Impending Intra

and

Inter-Cultural

Resource

Scarcity Armageddon

Mobjustice

Genocide Conflict: ‘Organized violence (whether by official nation state military or dissident guerrilla warfare terrorists) warfare is an extension of political warfare, by other means. Political warfare is an extension of economic warfare, by other means. Military, political and economic warfare are the resource-thieving warfare consequences of citizens living in tribes and nations whose social contracts -- inalienable right to breed and consume indulgence for sale constitutions with total disregard for ecological resource carrying capacity limits -- are based upon international Flat Earth social contract jurisprudence.’ - amended quote of Carl von Clausewitz, ‘On War’.

[74]

Cultural conflict is a type of conflict that occurs when flat earth social contract

legislatures enact legislation that enforces integration (as opposed to territorial segregation) between different racial, religious and ideological cultures; and consequently individuals with different cultural values41 and beliefs come into repeated contact with one another and a clash of cultural values occurs. It is not possible for cultural conflict to occur when individuals from cultures who prefer not to associate with members of other cultures are granted their own territory, remain in their own territory (i.e. do not engage in breeding or consumption war resource 41 Sandbacka C (1975); Ting-Toomey S (1986); Sarmela M (-); Turner J (2005); Western J (1997); Jones D (2010); Watters E (2013); Henrich J, Heine S & Norenzayan A (2009); Zizek S (1997);

thieving practices) and are not coercively legislatively integrated. [For a more detailed legal analysis including Flat Earth Multicultural Conflict in Integrated and Segregated societies, see Amicus submission to Judge Russell Healy in the matter of Florida v Michael Dunn42]. [75]

Objectively there is much agreement on the reality that racial, religious and

ideological inter-cultural conflict exists, and is getting exponentially worse, ranging from political and economic propaganda word wars to bullet wars. The list of individuals from various military and civilian cultures who believe themselves to be – socio-culturally, legally and for some militarily – engaged in Huntington’s clash of totalitarian agriculture and Primitivist cultural civilizations is significant and includes individuals from ideological (left to right), class, religious and ethno cultures; including for example Anders Breivik, Anjem Choudary 43 and the US Army War College44; who specifically refer to the conflict being inter-cultural. Extensive Environment / Overshoot-Scarcity-Conflict documentation45 from military and intelligence agencies, united nations and governments, NGO’s and academic reports, collectively document how legislative failure to restrict humanity’s procreation and consumption to ecological cultural carrying capacity limits, and Legal Matrix Indulgences to Corporations legislation: Socialized Corporate Externality Costs: Trillion Dollar Thefts from Global Natural Capital Commons46, has resulted in humanity’s ecological overshoot of carrying capacity limits by between 700 to 400,000 percent47; which include crossing urgent Planetary Boundary Tipping Points 48: (i) Loss of Biodiversity and Species Extinctions49; (ii) Climate Change50; (iii) Nitrogen Cycle51; (iv) Ocean Acidification52; (v) Changes in Land Use53; (vi) Global Freshwater http://sqswans.weebly.com/fl-4th-judicial-crt.html Islam4UK's Anjem Choudari agrees with Breivik that Islam and Non-Islam are at War in Europe http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2012/04/islam4uks-anjem-choudari-agrees-with.html 44 1996: US Army War College: Parameters: The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict, and War http://in-gods-name.blogspot.com/2012/05/1996-us-army-war-college-parameters.html 45 Bundeswehr (Sep 2010); Gizewski, Peter (Spring 1997); White House: National Security Council (1974/04/24); Bush, GW Snr (1986/02); White House: National Security Council (1974/12/10); White House: National Security Council (1975/11/26); White House: Nixon, R. (1969/07/18); White House: Nixon, R (1970/03/16); White House: Nixon, R. (1972/05/05); White House: Rockefeller Commission Report (1972/03/27); Development, Concepts and Doctrine Center (DCDC) (12 January 2010); United Nations: (1974/08): World Population Plan of Action; UNEP 2010 Annual Report; UNEP (2011) UN Water Policy Brief; United States Army: Murphy, R (2006/10/24); Dept. of Army (December 1994); Dept of the Army (25 July 2008); United States Army & TRADOC (2012); Freier, Nathan (November 2008); David, MAJ William E (April 1996); Butts, Kent (25 April 1994); Bush, Col BX (13 Mar 1997); Peters, R (1996); Peters, Ralph (Summer 1997); Ubbelohde, LTC Kurt F. (10 April 2000); Department of Defense: (Feb 2010); Defense Science Board Task Force (Oct 2011); Department of Defense (Jan 2012); United States Joint Forces Command (2010/02/18); U.S. Forest Service (Dec 2012); World Bank (18 Nov 2012). For full citations see list of authorities in Ecology of Peace Officer Amicus filed in Florida v. Michael Dunn http://sqswans.weebly.com/fl-4th-judicial-crt.html 46 http://tygae.weebly.com/corp-externalities.html 47 http://tygae.weebly.com/ecological-overshoot.html 48 http://tygae.weebly.com/tipping-points.html 49 http://tygae.weebly.com/biodiversity-loss.html 50 http://tygae.weebly.com/climate-change.html 51 http://tygae.weebly.com/nitrogen-cycle.html 52 http://tygae.weebly.com/ocean-acidification.html 42 43

Use54; (vii) State Shift in the Earth’s Biosphere55; (viii) Peak Non-Renewable Natural Resources: Scarcity56; with current ecological overshoot climate-resource-scarcityconflict, and impending ecological collapse, the collapse of industrial civilization and climate collapse all acting as threat multiplier aggravating factors in humanity’s ‘scarcity-conflict’ death spiral.

[76]

The disagreement about the current and impending aggravated reality of racial,

religious and ideological inter-cultural conflict occurs between the inter-cultural conflict (a) honourable problem solvers; and (b) dishonourable parasite profiteers.

http://tygae.weebly.com/land-use.html http://tygae.weebly.com/freshwater-use.html 55 http://tygae.weebly.com/biosphere-state-shift.html 56 http://tygae.weebly.com/peak-nnr-scarcity.html 53 54

[77]

The MILINT Earth Day group of individuals57 from various ideological, racial,

class and religious Primitivist and totalitarian agriculture cultures are engaged in a problem solving orientated campaign to abolish the breeding and consumption war totalitarian

agriculture

root

causes

inter-cultural

conflict;

establish

international jurisprudence requiring all countries to reduce and once attained, maintain their citizens procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits. [78]

The other group is either unaware of MILINT Earth Day efforts and goals; or

if aware refuse to (i) publicly commit to supporting MILINT Earth Day’s efforts to abolish the breeding and consumption war root causes of inter-cultural conflict; or (ii) if honourably legally objecting to MILINT Earth Day’s submission; to file a legal brief of objection; instead insisting on engaging in breeding and consumption wars, ranging from passive aggressive Violent Fundamentalist Avoidance word wars to intra and inter-cultural bullet wars to expand their tribal cultural territory. Current Flat Earth Social Contract Rule of Force Prisons: “New York’s Rikers Island: This was the armpit of New York City: A place for detaining excess populations who are unemployable. Jails like rain to a farmer – just make sure you don’t get too much of it. Jail was a chance, with little risk, to impress gangsters from the Neighbourhood; there were men in all the New York jails who knew my father and grandfather. On the street, I had to work for a rep, but in jail I could build it easily, pick up the law from older Neighbourhood fellas, names I could use to drop on the outside, like “You was with Yago,” or “You was with Irving the Banker.”” – John Maher, as quoted in John Maher of Delancey Street: A Guide for Peaceful Revolution in America, by Grover Sales.

[79]

Generally speaking, the majority of individuals who find themselves in physical

prisons (whether general population or solitary confinement) are ‘surplus population’ symptoms of national inter-tribal class, race and cultural resource thieving conflict. [80]

A minority of individuals who find themselves in physical prisons are generally

political, socio-cultural or ideological dissidents of one or other breeding or consumption war ideological prison. [81]

In my personal experience, of engaging many political prisoners (from the far

right to the far left) my working hypothesis conclusions are that less than 0.1 percent of history’s minority dissidents (political prisoners) have found themselves

http://tygae.weebly.com/milint-earth-day-sign-up.html

incarcerated because of their dissenting opposition to the flat earth ‘rule of force’ social contract, demanding it to be abolished and replaced with a social contract founded on ecological carrying capacity limits. To the contrary their dissenting political motivated criminality was consciously or unconsciously motivated towards upholding the flat earth ‘rule of force’ social contract, but amending it by force to enable the growth of their respective breeding or consumption war tribe, for greater access to depleting resources.

ECO-INNOCENT LEAVER COMMONSISM ÆQUILIBRIÆX JURISPRUDENCE: Primitivist / MILINT Ecology of Peace Guerrylla Lawfare Laws: [82]

Guerrylla Laws define the Eco/Ego Footprint58 procreation and consumption

behaviour of an individual as a Sustainable Leaver (aka Eco-Innocent) or Unsustainable

Taker

(aka

Scarcity-Combatant),

based

upon

sustainable

consumption bio-capacity of 1 global hectare (gha)59 (60 % of 1.8 gha)60 in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan61; multiplied by an individuals procreation footprint factor of 20 per child. [(Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 2062)] [83]

For example: Amici’s Consumption Footprint63 using Sustainable Economy's

Myfootprint.org quiz, is 12.75 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. Amici has no children, consequently her EcoFootprint: The difference between the biocapacity and Ecological Footprint of a region or country. A biocapacity deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to that population. If there is a regional or national biocapacity deficit, it means that the region is importing biocapacity through trade or liquidating regional ecological assets. Global biocapacity deficit cannot be compensated through trade, and is overshoot. 59 Sustainable Footprint Biocapacity: A biocapacity of 1 gha assumes that 40% of land is set aside for other species. 1 gha is 60 % of 1.8 gha, therefore .8 hectares is set aside for other species. 60 International Biocapacity: In 2006, the average biologically productive area (biocapacity) per person worldwide was approximately 1.8 global hectares (gha) per capita. In 2008, there were ~ 12 billion hectares of biologically productive land and water on Earth. Dividing by the number of people alive in that year (6.7 billion) gives 1.79 global hectares per person. This assumes that no land is set aside for other species that consume the same biological material as humans. 61 Bhutan Proactive Conservation: Bhutan is seen as a model for proactive conservation initiatives. The Kingdom has received international acclaim for its commitment to the maintenance of its biodiversity. This is reflected in the decision to maintain at least sixty percent of the land area under forest cover, to designate more than 40% of its territory as national parks, reserves and other protected areas, and most recently to identify a further nine percent of land area as biodiversity corridors linking the protected areas. Environmental conservation has been placed at the core of the nation's development strategy, the middle path. It is not treated as a sector but rather as a set of concerns that must be mainstreamed in Bhutan's overall approach to development planning and to be buttressed by the force of law. - "Parks of Bhutan". Bhutan Trust Fund for Environmental Conservation online. Bhutan Trust Fund. 62 Paul Murtaugh (7-31-09): Family Planning: A Major Environmental Emphasis, Oregon University http://sqswans.weebly.com/child--ecofootprint-x-20.html 63 http://myfootprint.org/en/your_results/?id=2559685

procreation factor is 0 x 20* = 0. Her Consumption (12.75) x Procreation (0) = Eco Footprint of 12.75/0 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Amici, we would need 0.81 earths.64 Conversely, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Jacob Zuma, we would need 2090 earths65. [84]

Planet of 1 Billion: Ecology of Peace status of 1 child is 12 gha: If for

example, there were only 3.5 billion people alive this year, that would have provided everyone with one child, with 3.5 gha (instead of 1 gha), and no children with 3.5 gha x 20 = 60.5 gha. If there were only 1 billion people, every person with one child would have access to 12 gha biocapacity for their needs, without transgressing carrying capacity limits, and entering into ecological overshoot. Put differently, if there were only 1 billion people on Earth this year, everyone could live my modest, but comfortable lifestyle, with the procreation factor of one child, without transgressing carrying capacity limits, and entering ecological overshoot. Note: The above statistics are also based upon using only 60 percent of biologically productive land of 12 billion hectares / population; meaning that 40 percent of biologically productive land is returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes. Judicial Procedures and Monastic Prisons under an International Law CommonSism social contract: [85]

As documented at MILINT Earth Day submission to the Swiss Federal Council;

Re: Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, in terms of Articles 142 & 14366; a significant minority number of individuals from left and right wing

political

ideologies,

rich

and

poor

socio-economic

classes,

various

ethnicities/races, religions and cultures accepted their legal invitations to support the implementation of an international law CommonSism social contract requiring all nations to reduce (and once attained maintain) their nation’s procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits.

http://sqworms.weebly.com/lara-johnstone-eco-081.html President Zuma’s consumption footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global hectares (gha). President Zuma’s Procreation Factor is 500 [President Zuma has 25 children. His procreation footprint factor is 25 x 20* = 500. (Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20)]. President Zuma’s Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint is 33280 gha [Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (500) = Net Footprint of 33280 gha]. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Zuma, we would need 2,090 earths. http://sqworms.weebly.com/jacob-zuma-ego-2090.html 66 http://tygae.weebly.com/milint-earth-day-sign-up.html 64

[86]

Put simply the proposed CommonSism social contract would proceed to turn

back the clock to eliminate the three root causes of ecological overshoot: (a) population above ecological carrying capacity limits; (b) consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits and (c) because consumption and procreation would be reduced and limited to carrying capacity limits, this would drastically reduce socioeconomic hierarchy; hence (d) reduce or eliminate resource motivated criminal violence resulting from ecological overshoot. [For detailed argument of Scarcity â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Conflict relationship see work of Dr Jack Alpert67 and Dr. Thomas Holmer-Dixon68]

[87]

This would result in the only individuals being imprisoned being (a)

CommonSism Cheaters: those who violate consumption or procreation carrying capacity limits; or (b) Voluntarist Cheaters: those convicted of engaging in any activity in a public or private space without obtaining the fully informed consent of other individuals involved in such activity, or present in such public or private space. CommonSism Justice Must be Absolute: [88]

This submission agrees with Judge Jason Brent, that in order for a

CommonSism Social Contract to work for all; it must be absolute; i.e. applied to everyone in equal measure. [89]

This submission disagrees with Judge Brent that (a) only procreation cheaters

should be executed, and (b) that anyone convicted of cheating, should not be given

67 68

http://sqswans.weebly.com/dr-jack-alpert.html http://sqswans.weebly.com/conflict-dr-thomas-homer-dixon.html

one opportunity to suspend execution, by choosing to demonstrate their sincerity to enrol in a Monastery Prison to reflect and rehabilitate themselves. [90]

As argued by former Municipal Court Judge Jason Brent, in Humans:

Endangered Species69: And now get ready for the most provocative portion of the book! .. [H]umanity cannot wait many years to commence the reduction of human population. Steps must be taken today which will reduce population growth to a negative number. Steps must be taken today which will reduce the human population below the current 6.7 billion who live on this planet. The survival of our species depends on action today. The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple---limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child窶馬ot one child for the male and one child for the female. These limitations would be applied to every single human being without regard to race, religion, national origin or anything else and it would be absolute, no exceptions. It would be applied without regard for wealth, or the lack of wealth, and it would be applied without regard for the country of birth or residence of either the male or female. It would be applied without regard to intelligence, or the lack thereof, and without regard of the ability of the male or female to function in society. (At a later date when a method was agreed upon relating to dividing human beings into two groups, the ability to function in society would be considered in relation to who could or could not reproduce.) The right to either father a child or for a female to give birth could not be sold or transferred; it would be personal to the individual. If a live child were born with a birth defect or with some other disability it would not permit either the father or mother to produce another child. Each couple would have the right to have all appropriate pre-natal tests to determine if the child in the womb would be born with a birth or genetic defect and if the chance existed that the child would be born with such a defect to have an abortion. Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since 69

http://www.jgbrent.com/

they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced. Since the birth of a child is very hard to hide, there must be communal responsibility and accountability for any attempt to do so. Those who knowingly failed to report the birth of a second or any higher number of children would themselves be subject to the very same severe punishment that would be meted out to the parents of the second or higher numbered childâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;no religious, cultural or ethnic exemptions would obtain. Humanity cannot consider the evasion of the single child rule a game to be played with a minor penalty, if caught. No group or individual could be permitted any evasion of the one child rule a that would lead to a disparity among groups and among individuals causing irreparable harm to the entire system established to reduce population. Should this sanction seem barbaric or draconian, it is surely less draconian in its effects than the merciless verdict of nature upon a species that refuses to contain its expansion. In order for this proposal to be fair, equitable and workable, society and governments would be required to take action today to provide the means for every human being to control his or her fertility, to give everyone on the face of the earth the ability to limit birth to a single child.

CommonSism Rule of Law Social Contract Judicial Proceedings: CommonSism violations: [91]

In any judicial proceedings involving any individual accused of violating

consumption or procreation carrying capacity limits, the court would require all individuals involved in such judicial proceedings, from judge, to prosecutor, attorneys and plaintiff, to submit to the court their evidence in support of their Eco-Innocent procreation and consumption footprint. [91.1]

Consumption

Violations:

Individuals

found

guilty

violating

consumption social contract limits; would be required to (A) either relinquish their excess consumed products; or if already spent pay an appropriate financial fine; to a conservation trust fund or similar; and (B) sign a legal agreement â&#x20AC;&#x201C; similar to the MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Oath (PDF70) â&#x20AC;&#x201C; with law enforcement authorities to commit to consuming below carrying capacity limits, and failing to

http://tygae.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/7/13878165/13-06-18_milint-earth-day-wyft-support-troops-oath_cert.pdf

honourably do so authorizing a Judge to authorize law enforcement officials, to remove their dishonourable genes from the national genepool. [91.2]

Procreation Violations: Individuals found guilty of violating procreation

social contract limits; would be required (A) to (i) relinquish said child for adoption (if wanted to be adopted by a family) and agree to be permanently sterilized; and (ii) sign a legal agreement – similar to aforementioned MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Oath – with law enforcement authorities to commit to consuming below carrying capacity limits, and failing to honourably do so authorizing a Judge to authorize law enforcement officials to remove their dishonourable genes from the national genepool; (B) if no adoptive family is found; both parents and children are to be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed. Consumption or Procreation Violations: Prison Sentence: [92]

If the court determines that the violations were sufficiently egregious, but the

transgressor argues that they request an opportunity to reflect on their transgressions, prior to being forced to agree to their execution and the removal of their genes from the national genepool; the court may require the individual to participate in a prison reflection process for a year to determine the underlying causes related to their conscious or subconscious motives for their CommonSism violations. See Prison Reflections further below. Voluntarist: Fully Informed Consent violations: [93]

In a judicial proceeding involving the violation of fully informed consent between

two or more individuals the courts only interest is in deciding (a) are the plaintiff and accused from the same culture; i.e hence share similar moral cultural values; or (b) from different cultures; i.e. share enough different cultural or sub-cultural values requiring the state to arbitrate between two conflicting sets of cultural morality norms; (c) were the actions between the plaintiff and defendant fully consensual; and (d) if not, whom violated the principle of fully informed consent in the specific acts; and finally (e) to what degree was the principle of a fully informed consensual act violated; i.e. from subjectively unintentional to premeditated malice. The focus of the court is not based on any uniform code of morality, but on specific relevant culture’s cultural norms. For example in the Seychelles littering is considered a cultural offence. Alternatively in honourable militant culture’s two individuals may consent to participate in an honourable duel at a time or place that does not violate other 32

parties cultural values, and even though another culture may consider the death of the loser, to be â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;murderâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;; because the act involved all relevant parties fully informed consent, the act would not be considered a cultural offence. Shared Cultural Values: Conviction Proceedings: [94]

If violation of consent dispute involves individuals who subjectively agree that

they share each others relevant similar gender, ethnicity, religion, or any other related cultural values; then the court proceedings simply enquire whether the acts were fully consensual, if not, who violated the principles of consent; and to what degree; within any relevant parameters of the parties particular cultural practices and norms. Shared Cultural Values: Sentencing Proceedings: [95]

Once it is determined who the consensual transgressor was, and to what degree

the consensual transgression occurred; the transgressor and transgressed parties should submit to the court their respective arguments and preferences for (a) how the violation of consent should be resolved: i.e. what punishment they consider appropriate for resolving the transgression ; (b) whether the party wishes to continue associating with the other party; or not; (c) if the parties preferences are to continue associating with each other, to negotiate an agreement as to how they intend to engage in fully informed consenting agreement association with each other; and (d) if the parties preferences are to discontinue associating with each other; to negotiate an agreement as to how they intend to commit to avoid any future association with each other. Different Cultural Values: Conviction Proceedings: [96]

If violation of consent dispute involves individuals who subjectively consider

themselves to share different gender, ethnicity, religion, or any other related cultural values; and that their dispute was a consequence of misunderstandings related to their different cultural values; then the court proceedings enquire whether the acts were fully consensual, if not, who violated the principles of consent; and to what degree; within the context of a conflict of laws and cultural norms judicial enquiry; evaluating the violation of consent to find a balance between the parties particular conflicting cultural practices and norms.

Different Cultural Values: Sentencing Proceedings: [97]

Once it is determined who the consensual transgressor was, and to what degree

the consensual transgression occurred; the transgressor and transgressed parties should submit to the court their respective arguments and preferences for (a) how the violation of consent should be resolved: i.e. what punishment they consider appropriate for resolving the transgression ; (b) whether the party wishes to continue associating with the other party; or not; (c) if the parties preferences are to continue associating with each other, to negotiate an agreement as to how they intend to engage in fully informed consenting agreement association with each other; and (d) if the parties preferences are to discontinue associating with each other; to negotiate an agreement as to how they intend to commit to avoid any future association with each other. Shared or Different Cultural Values: Prison Sentence: [98]

If the individual transgressed (a) submits to the court an argument that the

transgression of consent was sufficiently malicious to justify the sentencing options of incarceration for a period of reflection or execution; and (b) the court agrees with such argument; the (c) transgressor should be given the option of choosing between (i) agreeing to be incarcerated to reflect on their transgression; or (ii) refusing to be incarcerated in preference of humane execution; and given the option to choose how they wish to be executed. [99]

If the Transgressor chooses to be incarcerated to reflect on their transgression,

the individual transgressed agrees to honourably engage the transgressor as part of his reflection process; for a period of one year. Monastery Prisons focussed on enabling Prisoner Reflection: [100]

A prison conducive to enabling prisoners to sincerely engage themselves in a

reflection process about their CommonSism or Voluntarist cheating (absence of personal responsibility); should be in many of its management processes be similar to a well run monastery or nunnery. [101]

The closest state run prison system that could be compared to include

management factors that encourage personal responsibility71, and a somewhat

Hardened Criminals Held in Freedom: Doing Time on Norway's Island Prison: No bars. No walls. No armed guards. The prison island of BastĂ¸y in Norway is filled with some of the country's most hardened criminals. Yet it emphasizes 71

monastic reflection experience for some of its residents, willing to engage in such a reflection experience72; would plausibly be the Norwegian prison system. [102]

Examples of Prisons that ‘work’: The Norwegian prison system may be the most

superior state run system in the western world; but Norway’s psychiatric system is plausibly one of, if not the most inferior, encouraging the very opposite of personal responsibility73. A reasonably superior rehabilitation system, not run by the State, is Delancey Street Foundation74; which focuses allot of attention teaching its members learning to engage in fully informed consensual agreements. [103]

A truly secular monastic prison enabling prisoner reflection process would

include monastic practices, such as for example: (i) self sufficiency: involving all individuals in food production and other duties to maintain its self-sufficiency; (ii) encourage thrifty use of resources; (iii) enable all of its residents to engage in times of quiet reflection, including having spaces for total silence; (iv) enable either the study of relevant spiritual or philosophical literate; or group therapy processes to encourage the transgressor to engage in self-examination reflection to confront and take personal and social responsibility for the underlying subconscious issues that contributed to their actions. [104]

Prison monasteries would be classified as Maximum Security Reflection (accept

transgressors whose actions included physical violence); or Minimum Security Reflection (accept transgressors whose actions did not include physical violence). [105]

Upon arrival at any Prison Monastery (Maximum or Minimum Security) the

transgressor would be required to confirm his sincere reflection motivations by entering into an agreement, that s/he intends to take personal responsibility for remaining at the Prison Monastery; until Monastery authorities or the court determine the transgressor has satisfactorily completed their reflection process. Furthermore the transgressor should unequivocally agree in writing, in a language self-control instead of the strictly regulated regimens common in most prisons. For some inmates, it is more than they can handle. http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/hardened-criminals-held-in-freedom-doing-time-on-norway-s-island-prisona-744851.html 72 In May 1994, Varg Vikernes, at the time described as a Neo-Nazi was sentenced to 21 years in prison for murder: stabbing Øystein 'Euronymous' Aarseth to death; and arson: burning down numerous Christian churches. He served almost 15 years of his sentence, and was released on parole in early 2009. In French Trial of Varg Vikernes Postponed, Vikernes, says that he experienced his time in the Norwegian prison system similar to being forced to spend time in a monastery. Vikernes is no longer a Neo-Nazi, currently claims to be an ethno-nationalist. http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/french-trial-of-varg-vikernes-postponed/ 73 Einar Øverenget Dr. of Philosophy: Psychiatry in Moral Crisis http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2012/04/einarverenget-dr-of-philosophy.html ||| Fampo: Norway, the Last Soviet Republic: Censorship, Child Protection and Psychiatry Worthy of a Dictatorship http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/2012/02/norway-last-soviet-republiccensorship.html 74 http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/

clearly understood by the transgressor, that should s/he violate such agreement and depart the monastery premises without authorization from Prison Monastery authorities, such Prison Monastery authorities are thereby authorized to notify relevant Law Enforcement authorities, who are authorized to execute transgressor upon capture; and remove the dishonourable transgressors gene’s from the national genepool. [106]

CommonSism Reflection: Personal Responsibility:

[107]

Superior prison system is one which ‘works’ to encourage the individual to take

personal responsibility. [108]

First Steps: An individual whose ego-identity mind has become too emotionally

or identity attached to any particular tribal identity moral interpretations of a collection of historical events, effectively experiencing a mental mind-sewer drain clogging, a philosophical failure of critical thinking and noticing emergency; must first do some mental mind-sewer drain un-clogging. Put simply they first need to flush their toilet mind of all the backed up interpretation sewage. The process of taking personal responsibility requires a return to factual reality, and as close as possible objective interpretative reality. [108.1]

FACTUAL REALITY: is founded upon FACTS: what happened, who said

what, who did what to whom, how and when. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. [108.2]

INTERPRETIVE REALITY: is founded upon the INTERPRETATION OF

FACTS (i.e. motives, causes, etc); commonly referred to as the 'why' behind the whom, when, how and what. When we consciously or unconsciously think about ‘why’ the whom we observed did or said what and how and when;, we enter into subjective interpretive reality. A.

is like relying on 7th or 15th person in a game of Chinese Whispers75, for data, as opposed to going to the first person source. B.

Objective

Interpretive

Reality:

The

least

simplest

degree

interpretation, is generally speaking the most reliable and objective. [108.3]

IDEOLOGICAL REALITY: is founded upon the ideological meaning

[109]

CommonSism Reflection: Ecological & Egological Literacy:

[110]

Ultimate personal responsibility – i.e. knowing yourself – involves not only being

ecologically and egologically literate; but practicing ecological and egological literacy in their relations with others. [111]

Ecological literacy self knowledge:

[111.1] A.

Ecological literacy premises: (a) earth is not flat; (b) resources are not infinite; (c) hence humans must establish laws to restrict human consumption and procreation to below carrying capacity limits to avoid resource scarcity conflict

[111.2]

Ecological literacy advocacy premises:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_whispers

(d) any individual or organisation that does not support ecological literacy social contract legislation is either (i) ecologically illiterate; or (ii) ecologically literate, but egologically illiterate.

[112]

Egological literacy self knowledge:

[112.1] A.

Egological literacy premises: Egologically illiterate: You are egologically illiterate, whenever (and to the extent that) you consistently engage other beings in a state of â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Dishonourable Passive Aggressive Fundamentalist Violent Avoidance (see below under Reflection Process) â&#x20AC;&#x201C; consciousness.

Egologically literate: You are egologically literate, whenever (and to the extent that) you consistently engage other beings in a state of â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Honourable

Reason and Logic Problem Solving (see below under Reflection Process) â&#x20AC;&#x201C; consciousness. [112.2] A.

Egological il/literacy advocacy premises: The biggest enemy you will ever face is not some external enemy; but internal: your egologically illiterate state of being (i.e. your fragile egoidentity-ego generally; or on a specific issue, or with a specific person).

The best friend you will ever have to support you to honourably face honourable external enemies is your egological literate ego.

The best friend any group of individuals have to bond them to each other as strong, loyal honourable warriors, are their egological literate ego's. Prison Reflection Process: Voluntarist Violation:

[113]

The Transgressorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Reflection process includes all parties agreeing to (a) commit

to honourably engage to finding a resolution to their dispute; i.e. enabling the transgressor to understand how it occurred, and addressing how to avoid it occurring again; or (b) commit to avoid engaging in violent or passive aggressive violent avoidance of addressing the underlying causes (emotional, psychological, or otherwise) that resulted in their absence of consent dispute. [114]

If the Transgressor either refuses to honourable engage the individualâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s

transgressed, or engages in passive aggressive avoidance; the matter may be referred back to the court to decide on the plausibility of whether extended incarceration may amend the transgressors stubbornness, and if not, provide the transgressor with the option to choose how he wishes to remove his dishonourable genes from the national genepool. [115]

If the transgressed individual/s either (a) refuse/s to commit to honourably

engaging the transgressor to finding a resolution of their dispute; i.e. understanding how it occurred, and addressing how to avoid it occurring again; or (b) engages in passive aggressive avoidance of addressing the underlying causes (emotional, psychological, or otherwise) that resulted in their violation of consent dispute; then the (c) transgressor should either be released from his prison reflection agreement; or the alleged transgressed individuals should be found guilty of violating their agreement to consent to engaging a resolution of their dispute; and both parties be required to engage in reflection, and if any party refuses; without justifiable reason,

such party should be provided the opportunity to choose their preferred option for removing their dishonourable genes from the national genepool; and the other party released. Reflection Process: Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving – v – Dishonourable Passive Aggressive Fundamentalist Violent Avoidance: [116]

Put simply and generally speaking: there are two ways of ‘being’ for humans in

the world. [116.1]

There is a way of being that respects honourable reason and logic problem

solving engagement. [116.2]

There is a way of being that respects dishonourable passive aggressive

fundamentalist violent avoidance. [117]

It is not easy to consistently spend time in a state of being that respects reason

and logic. [118]

Most of humanity unconsciously spend most of their life in relationships in a

state of being that respects violence, while bullshitting themselves they respect reason and logic. Reflection Process: Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Engagement: [119]

Generally speaking you are in a state of honourable reason and logic problem

solving engagement in any relationship to the extent that you are willing to: [119.1]

sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual,

irrespective of their political ideology (right wing to left wing), religion, race or culture; [119.2]

actively listening means you verify that your interpretation of their

statements is accurate; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’; [119.3]

you focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible

descriptive words76 (as opposed to abstract concepts; and where you do use abstract concepts; you are willing to define your meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance)

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/abstract.htm

[119.4]

you evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not

their race, religion or political ideology; etc; [119.5]

if you are not convinced by their evidence on any particular issue; you are

willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and remain in the conversation until you find agreement (if ever); and support each other on other issues that you do agree upon. [119.6]

if conflict arises in the discussion about the issue, you are committed to

remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing yourselves to get over your anger (as opposed to requiring yourself or others to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons) [119.7]

if their evidence proves any of your evidence for any of your ideological or

other working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; you love reason and logic more than your ego-identity and hence you are willing to publicly change your mind, on that particular subject and amend your ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided. Reflection Process: Dishonourable Passive Aggressive Fundamentalist Violence Avoidance: [120]

Generally speaking you are in a state of dishonourable passive aggressive

fundamentalist violent avoidance (ideological, intellectual, emotional or physical) in any relationship to the extent that you: [120.1]

avoid sincerely and actively listening to the evidence from any individual,

particularly from individuals whom you identify as belonging to a particular race, political ideology (left or right wing), religion, race or culture [120.2]

consciously or unconsciously deliberately avoid actively listening to verify

that your interpretation of their statements are accurate; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’; [120.3]

you focus on complicating the issue discussed to deliberately create

ambiguity; using as much as possible abstract concepts77; and refuse or avoid defining your meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance; [120.4]

you avoid addressing their argument or their evidence, or deliberately

misrepresent their argument or evidence; generally for conscious or unconscious 77

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/abstract.htm

motives related to their membership of some political ideological group, race, religion or culture; [120.5]

if you are convinced by their evidence on any particular issue; you avoid

admitting such; and you also refuse to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and remain in the conversation until you find agreement (if ever); and support each other on other issues that you do agree upon. [120.6]

you consciously or subconsciously attempt to create conflict in the

discussion; to avoid addressing their argument or evidence; and when such conflict arises; you use the conflict as an excuse to withdraw from the conversation; and avoid exploring opportunities to allow yourselves to get over your anger (as opposed to requiring yourself or others to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons); and remain in the conversation; [120.7]

if their evidence proves any of your evidence for any of your ideological or

other working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; you love your ego(political/racial/cultural)-identity more than reason and logic, and refuse to change your mind, on that particular subject and amend your ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided. International Law relating to Just War Inter-Cultural Conflict: [121]

Just War Theory78 is a derivative of International law, which deals with the

justifications – theoretical or historical -- for war and how and why wars are fought. The theoretical aspect is used by politicians or historians to determine whether a war can, or could be ethically justified, and what forms of warfare are, and are not allowed. The Just War Tradition, or historical aspect of Just War Theory dates back to the concept of Chivalry, or more specifically the codes of Military Honour conduct that have held currency with the military elite since the age of chivalry, as documented in Chivalry without a Horse: Military Honour and the Modern Law of Armed Conflict79, by Rain Liivoja. [122]

Just War theory, or what is known as the Just War Tradition originated from

the principles of Military Honour, also known as Chivalry, with subsequent codification as a body of rules applicable to warfare, in among others the Geneva and Hague conventions. According to Alexander Moseley in Just War Theory: Just War Theory, by Alexander Moseley, Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy http://www.iep.utm.edu/justwar/ Rain Liivoja. 2010. "Chivalry without a Horse: Military Honour and the Modern Law of Armed Conflict" submitted to the Proceedings of the Estonian National Defence College Available at: http://works.bepress.com/rain_liivoja/15 78

[122.1]

Historically, the just war tradition–a set of mutually agreed rules of

combat—may be said to commonly evolve between two culturally similar enemies. That is, when an array of values are shared between two warring peoples, we often find that they implicitly or explicitly agree upon limits to their warfare. But when enemies differ greatly because of different religious beliefs, race, or language, and as such they see each other as “less than human”, war conventions are rarely applied. It is only when the enemy is seen to be a people, sharing a moral identity with whom one will do business in the following peace, that tacit or explicit rules are formed for how wars should be fought and who they should involve and what kind of relations should apply in the aftermath of war. In part, the motivation for forming or agreeing to certain conventions, can be seen as mutually benefiting—preferable, for instance, to the deployment of any underhand tactics or weapons that may provoke an indefinite series of vengeance acts, or the kinds of action that have proved to be detrimental to the political or moral interests to both sides in the past. [122.2]

Moseley qualifies the principles of the justice of war as: (i) having just

cause, (ii) being a last resort, (iii) being declared by a proper authority, (iv) possessing right intention, (v) having a reasonable chance of success, and (vi) the end being proportional to the means used. [123]

An example of individual inter-cultural conflict based upon Just War principles,

could include among others duelling or individuals voluntarily engaging in fight-club practices. [123.1]

Not too many years ago, duelling laws existed, that allowed any man to

honourably challenge any other man to a duel (where the legal principles were clearly codified in the minds of men sharing such honourable duelling cultural values); and nobody batted an eyelid, if the challenger or the person challenged lost their life from honourably accepting such a duel. [123.2]

An example of individuals voluntarily engaging in fully informed consent

fight club organized conflict violence would be officially organized violence sporting matches, such as boxing, wrestling etc, or unofficially organized violence fight club sporting matches. For example: Former Navy Seal friends of mine, in their military youth, used to engage in voluntary fight club bar brawls (get rid of their testosterone); where they would go out to bars looking for a serious fist fight, and beat the holy shit out of each other, but they always picked other military guys, also looking for a fight, and days later would not even be angry about having beaten each 43

other up; but proudly share their blue eye ‘makeup’ they had received from each other. [123.3]

On a relevant side note: The Shape of Things to Come: Why Age Structure

Matters to a Safer More Equitable World80; a report from Population Action International, and The Effects of ‘Youth Bulge’ on Civil Conflicts81, by Lionel Beehner from the Council on Foreign Relations provide details about how large populations of idle young men contribute to socio-cultural conflict: [123.4]

“Between 1970 and 1999, 80 percent of all civil conflicts that caused at least

25 deaths occurred in countries in which 60 percent or more of the population was under age 30. During the 1990s, countries with a very young structure were three times more likely to experience civil conflict than countries with a mature age structure. Nearly 90 percent of countries with very young structures had autocratic or weakly democratic governments at the end of the 20th century”. [123.5]

“The Trouble with Men: Why are youth bulges so often volatile? The short

answer is: too many young men with not enough to do. When a population as a whole is growing, ever larger numbers of young males come of age each year, ready for work, in search of respect from their male peers and elders. Typically, they are eager to achieve an identity, assert their independence and impress young females. While unemployment rates tend to be high in developing countries, unemployment among young adult males is usually from three to five times as high as adult rates, with lengthy periods between the end of schooling and first placement in a job. Are young males more prone to violence than older men, or than women? The preponderance of social research suggests that they are. Men account for about 90 percent of arrests for homicide in almost all countries surveyed. All over the world, young men (in this case, defined as aged 15 to 34) are responsible for more than three-quarters of violent crimes.

Objectors to the CommonSism Eco-Civilization Option: [124]

Anyone capable of critical thinking and evaluating two contradictory options for

the future; would imagine that everyone given the aforementioned choice, would choose the CommonSism Eco-Civilization option. However this is not the case. A 80 81

Leahy E & Engelman R (2003) Beehner L (2007)

significant number of individuals invited to support the CommonSism option; have (a) either declined to do so or simply ignored their invitations; and (b) if declined: have failed to honourably provide their evidentiary justifications for their objection. [125]

Consequently I can only speculate as to their possible reasons for declining to

support an orderly and humane process of de-industrialization, and favouring a mobjustice organized violence de-industrialized descent into slavery and genocidal race, religion and class wars. [126]

Speculative Working Hypothesis reasons for objection by a significant number of

members (not all) from the following ideological factions: [126.1]

Religious ideological factions (Christians and Muslims): They are addicted

to their religious prophecies of Armageddon, the return of Jesus or Allah, and so on. [126.2]

Right wing racial ideological factions (Neo Nazis, etc): They are

ideologically addicted to their ideologically prophesied impending race war. [126.3]

Left wing racial ideological factions (From Rappers, Hip Hoppers, Antifa

Wiggers to Sharpton & Jackson, some Liberal Muslim factions, et al): They are ideologically addicted to their ideological prophesied impending race war. [127]

Believers that Non-Europeans are Untermenschen:

[127.1]

Right wing racial ideological factions (Neo-Nazis): They publicly believe

that the flock of the racial black left (Rappers, Hip Hoppers, Sharpton, Jackson et al; etc) are culturally inferior (some of their concepts of inferiority go as far as untermenschen; others consider their inferiority more akin to culturally stunted); because they are physically or intellectually incapable of responsible procreation. [127.2]

Left wing racial ideological factions (From Rappers, Hip Hoppers, Antifa

Wiggers to Sharpton & Jackson, some liberal Muslimc factions, et al): They secretly believe: A.

that the Right wing racial ideological factions (Neo-Nazis) are correct about the left wing racial ideological factions flock being culturally inferior: not physically or intellectually capable of responsible procreation and engaging in fully informed consenting agreements;

do not have the honour and integrity to publicly inform their flock and admit to their secret beliefs, that their ideology of so-called â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;racial equalityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; is subjectively nothing but a self-deception illusion, because secretly they

believe their own flock are nothing more than culturally inferior: not physically or intellectually capable of responsible procreation and engaging in fully informed consenting agreements; and hence only worthy of being used as breeding and vote farm cannon fodder. [128]

So the racial right wing thinks that although the racial left wingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s flock are

inferior/untermenschen, it is (a) possible such constructive criticism may be incorrect, and that such racial left wing flock, may in fact listen to constructive criticism and amend their inferior/untermenschen behaviour; or (b) that even if they are in fact inferior/untermenschen; they at least deserve to be treated honestly and provided with such honest constructive criticism. [129]

The racial left wingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s actions towards their flock however, indicate that they

unequivocally believe (i) their own flock to be untermenschen and (ii) of such an inferior state of untermenschen, that they are incapable of the psychological, moral and intellectual character traits to hear such constructive criticism and better themselves; hence (iii) their untermenschen flock are unworthy of honest tough love constructive criticism about their possible untermenschen characterises, so as to be able to confront them, and overcome them. [130]

From personal experience, of living and travelling around the globe, interacting

with individuals from different ideologies, classes (including so-called functionally illiterate classes) the authorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s personal experience is that indeed no two people are equal, every individual and groups of individuals have superior and inferior physical, psychological, emotional, and intellectual skills and capabilities. [See Radical Honoursty Legal Definition of Racism below]. [131]

No matter how illiterate or uneducated, individuals and groups of individuals

who are sincere about learning and growing value honourable tough love problem solving orientated constructive criticism from their peers or even enemies, about any of their inferior characteristics or skills; were the ones who were willing to struggle to overcome that particular inferiority in their character or skill set and better themselves. They overcome their inferiority insecurity on any issues, by accepting constructive criticism and working to prove the essence of such constructive criticism to be erroneous. [132]

Individuals and groups who value political correctness pleasant ideas about

nobody being inferior or superior and everyone somehow being magically equal in all character traits and skills; who shun and vilify constructive honourable tough love 46

criticism, thereby avoid addressing their own, friends or followers inferiority insecurities; do not experience personal growth to overcome their insecurities, and improve their relationships with each other.

Is it racist to say that ‘Non-Europeans breed like untermenschen’?: [133]

Legally Defining the term ‘Racist’:

[134]

Subjective belief: an idea or concept believed by a person, which can be

objectively true or false. For example: [134.1]

White men are generally technologically speaking superior to black men.

[134.2]

African American men are generally speaking superior to white men in

basketball. [135] be

Definition of Racist/ Racial Supremacist: In order for a subjective belief to 'racial/religious/gender/culture'

supremacist

(i.e.

morally

unethical);

the

‘supremacist belief’ must be (a) subjectively fundamentalist insincerely held, and (b) objectively false. [135.1]

Not Supremacist: Sincere: the person holds a belief about white/blacks

being superior (generally) or specifically in any particular skill, and if objectively false, the person has no personal experience evidence it is untrue. [135.2] A.

Example: A member of the KKK/BPP who has: Never had the personal experience opportunity to meet an honest honourable black/white person who engaged him/her honourably and sincerely (i.e. using the skills above under Reflection process: Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Engagement); and/or

Repeatedly personally made the honourable effort to engage possible honourable sincere black/white persons honourably and sincerely (i.e. using the skills above under Reflection process: Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Engagement)

[135.3]

Supremacist:

Insincere:

the

person

believes

idea

about

Muslims/Christians being superior (generally) or in a particular skill; even though (a) they have met a Christian/Jew who has proven their supremacy idea to be false; yet they refuse to amend their opinion to reflect the new information, and insist on their supremacy idea; which (b) is both subjectively and objectively false.

[135.4] A.

Example: A member of the KKK/BPP who has: Had the personal experience opportunity to meet an honest honourable black/white person who engaged him/her honourably and sincerely (i.e. using the skills above under Reflection process: Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Engagement); and either refused to reciprocate such honourable sincerity; rebuffed it, or pretends it never occurred; and/or

Never personally made the honourable effort to engage possible honourable sincere black/white persons honourably and sincerely (i.e. using the skills above under Reflection process: Honourable Reason and Logic Problem Solving Engagement); simply believing that every single black/white person walking the face of the earth is unworthy of being treated honourably and sincerely.

[135.5]

Consequently a sincerely (Sincere: free from pretence or deceit; proceeding

from genuine feelings) held subjective belief about the supremacy of any individual or generally speaking group of individuals, that is objectively false; cannot be ‘racist’ and hence ‘morally unethical’; since the individual subjectively has no factual or experiential evidence justifying the amendment of his objectively false belief. Only when such an individual has been provided with experiential or factual evidence to the contrary, and refuses to amend his objectively inaccurate belief, would his belief be considered both fundamentalist ‘insincerely held’ and objectively false, and hence morally unethical. [136]

For example:

[136.1]

White men are generally technologically speaking superior to black men.

[136.2]

African American men are generally speaking superior to white men in

basketball. A.

If subjective sincere, such a statement is not racial supremacist. To change the mind of someone who holds a subjective sincere belief about general racial superiority, DO NOT accuse them of RACISM/SUPREMACISM; if you wish to abolish Racism/Supremacism. Do sincerely engage them to (a) be specific about what skill they are referring to; (b) provide them with factual (and if relevant personal honourable sincerity) evidence to the contrary.

[136.3]

Serena Williams is superior to 99% of white, black, Asian women at tennis.

[136.4]

Traditional Bushmen culture is superior to European, Asian and African

culture at living sustainably. 48

If objectively true, such statements are not racially supremacist; because FACTS cannot be RACIST.

[137]

Conclusion: Stating an objective fact about any individual or generally speaking

group of individual’s supremacy at any particular physical, intellectual, psychological or emotional skill cannot be morally unethical. If OBJECTIVELY TRUE, such statements are not racially supremacist, and hence not morally unethical. They are simply the statement of an objective fact. [138]

Is it racist to say that ‘Non-Europeans breed like untermenschen’?:

[139]

Liberals secret/covert belief: Generally speaking many Non-Europeans (Africans

and Latinos) are untermenschen: not physically or intellectually capable of responsible procreation and engaging in fully informed consenting agreements. [140]

Example of this ‘European have superior breeding behaviour culture to Africans’

belief: Liberal Professor Amy Wax82; Professor of Social Welfare and Family Law at Penn State; author of: Race, Wrongs and Remedies83; in an interview with Mr. Adam Serwer,

journalist

American

Prospect84;

supported

New

Republic85

conservatives, and Majority Rights86, ethno-nationalists: What blacks are doing -- the choices they are making educationally, criminally, etc -- is radically dysfunctional, and it requires them to confront that reality; and they are only hurting themselves to continue believing and acting in these ways. And even if some of them have such a realization, they are not translating it into action as a group. Take the choice to get married. We have data that shows that even when you control for income, job and education; where you have 3 men: 1 white, 1 asian, 1 black. They have the same job, same income, same education. The black man is about half as likely to get married, and is many more times likely to have a child out of wedlock and to have multiple children with multiple women out of wedlock. So poverty is not dictating their behaviour. Their culture, their habits, their upbringing, their attitudes, their values are dictating their behaviour. The decision to have a baby out of wedlock may be rational individually for a black woman, but for the group it is a disaster. If people are going to make decisions that are good for them, but complain that the group is lagging behind, they must take a look at themselves, cause they are doing it to themselves.

https://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/awax/ http://astore.amazon.com/whitrefu-20/detail/0742562867 84 http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/31524?in=29:04&out=61:00 85 http://www.tnr.com/book/review/what-hope 86 http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/why_the_left_is_finished_in_microcosm/ironwand.blogspot.it 82 83

So blacks are surrounded by different norms, they can’t get themselves out of it. It requires a conversion experience. It requires the black community to say to themselves that what we are doing is not working, the way they are living is not working. Groups and cultures succeed by building human capital, and blacks are not doing a good job of building the human capital of the next generation. Their is wholesale abandonment of the next generation. To change this reality of choices favouring criminality and under-achievement, they have to change decision-making in a radical way. White people make better decisions because our culture is superior. Because someone is born into a superior culture, such a person generally makes better decisions. People came from poverty as immigrants, and they leap frog above blacks who have been in America for centuries. The notion to blame everything on poverty is just bunkum. Poverty is not the problem, it is not the determinative factor, because people overcome it everyday. Superiority of white cultural norms makes the difference. Blacks rates of crime are higher, their marriage rates are lower, so its not money, it’s a set of habits, outlook, cultural norms that just keep perpetuating themselves. In part affluence comes out of these superior cultural norms.

[140.1] A.

Non-Europeans as Untermenschen: Objectively true? Fact: Africans Americans and Latino’s generally procreate way above ecological carrying capacity limits; i.e. have fertility ratios between 2 to 7 (depending on country) children per woman.

Interpretation: Why? a.

Is this irresponsible breeding behaviour a result of physical incapacity? Are they untermenschen because they are physically incapable

self

discipline

refrain

from

fornicating

responsibly (i.e. avoiding unwanted and unloved children87)?; or b.

Is this irresponsible breeding behaviour a result of intellectual incapacity? Dunning-Kruger effect studies88 show that many people are so stupid, that they don’t know they are stupid, and refuse to consider the possibility they may be stupid, which stops them from overcoming their stupidity.

[140.2]

87 88

Liberal Supremacist/Racist: Insincere:

Muhrrteyn A (26 Feb 2013) Kruger Justin; David Dunning (1999); Nagel Mago (2010); Wolchover Natalie (28 Feb 2012)

A liberal (or any person of any race, ideology, religion, culture) who believes that generally speaking Non-Europeans are not untermenschen, i.e. physically or intellectually capable of responsible procreation, IS A RACIST/SUPREMACIST; if their belief is (a) objectively false, and (b) INSINCERELY held. a.

If their belief about â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;racial equality (in terms of the skill of responsible procreation) is (a) objectively false (not true irrespective of whether such objective truth is considered controversial

politically

incorrect;

not

sufficiently

objectively proven beyond reasonable doubt) and (b) insincere (i.e. they pretend to believe in racial equality); but either make no effort to support a truth seeking enquiry to verify whether racial equality is true in terms of the skill of responsible procreation; and/or they make allot of effort to silence anyone engaged in searching for the objective truth, which would publicly expose their objectively false belief as exactly that. [140.3] A.

NOT Supremacist/Racist: Sincere: Amy Wax, Adam Serwer, etc: A liberal / progressive / conservative / Aryan Brotherhood member etc; who believes that Non-Europeans are untermenschen, i.e. physically or intellectually

incapable

responsible

procreation;

NOT

RACIST/SUPREMACIST; if their belief is (a) objectively true; and (b) SINCERELY held. a.

If they sincerely (a) overtly and publicly hold the belief, and do not deny that they hold such a belief; (b) are willing to discuss the evidence for their belief and sincerely and honourably consider alternative factual evidence, and/or interpretations of such factual evidence; and (c) do not engage in efforts to silence any such honest sincere truth seeking enquiry.

Relief Recommended: [141]

If Petitionerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sincerely:

[141.1]

Are sick and tired of being lied to and deceived by the ambiguity, plausible

deniability, coercion, arbitrariness and deception of Taker Scarcity-Combatant social contract jurisprudence; and

[141.2] –

Appreciate the honest tough love constructive criticism about their alleged

correctly

incorrectly

–

untermenschen

Taker

Scarcity-Combatant89

characteristics; so as to be able to confront them, and overcome them; thereby proving such themselves capable of being Leaver Eco-Innocents90; and [141.3]

Committed to supporting their California Legislators to amend California’s

Taker Scarcity-Combatant social contract of ambiguity, plausible deniability, coercion, arbitrariness and deception; to a Leaver Eco-Innocent social contract founded on eco/egological literacy clarity, informed consent, fairness and justice. [142]

Petitioners should demonstrate such sincere commitment by:

[142.1]

Engaging in an investigative enquiry to determine how many of California’s

prisoners (county jail, general population and solitary confinement) would commit to supporting California’s legislature to implement an Eco-Innocent social contract constitution of clarity, informed consent, fairness and justice based upon ecological resource carrying capacity reality and Voluntarist principles; for California; by [142.2]

Providing the Respondents and United Nations Working Group on

Arbitrary Detention; in this matter; with said Petitioner’s signed MILINT Earth Day Ecology of Peace Citizen Oaths (which must include a paragraph that specifies the Petitioner’s agreement to be surgically sterilized, prior to being released by CDC). Dated at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot: 25 February 2014

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se PO Box 4052, George, 6539, South Africa Tel/Fax: (044) 870 7239 jmcswan@mweb.co.za

Taker Scarcity-Combatant: an individual/ who is/are not physically or intellectually capable of (i) responsible procreation and/or consumption below carrying capacity limits and /or (ii) engaging in Voluntarist (fully informed consent) agreements. 90 Leaver Eco-Innocent: an individual who is physically and intellectually capable of (i) responsible procreation and consumption below carrying capacity limits and (ii) engaging in Voluntarist (fully informed consent) agreements. 89

CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE I certify that the original was electronically filed to: United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention [Chair Rapporteur: Mr. Mads Andenas (Norway) | Vice-Chair: Mr. Vladimir Tochilovsky (Ukraine) | Committee Members: Mr. Malick El Hadji Sow (Senegal) | Ms. Shaheen Sardar Ali (Pakistan) | Mr. Roberto Garret贸n (Chile)] via WGAD Office (wgad@ohchr.org). and contemporaneously served electronically to parties: Petitioners: 1. Ctr for Human Rights & Const Law: S. Peter Schey Esq (pschey@centerforhumanrights.org); Carlos R Holguin Esq (crholguin@centerforhumanrights.org) 2. Disability Rights California: Senior Counsel: Melinda Bird Esq (Melinda.Bird@disabilityrightsca.org) 3. California Prison Focus: Marilyn McMahon Esq (marilyn@prisons.org) 4. Legal Svc for Prisoners with Children: Carol Strickman Esq (Carol@prisonerswithchildren.org) Respondents: 1. United States of America: c/o Ambassador Samantha Power: US Mission to the United Nations: c/o Press and Public Diplomacy Section via Contact Form1 2. State of California: c/o: Attorney General Kamala Harris: c/o Appellate Coordinator: Office of the Attorney General via Contact Form2 3. Gov. Jerry Brown: Governor of California via Contact Form3 4. Matthew Cate: Secretary: CA Dept of Corrections & Rehab via: Office of the Ombudsman: Sara Malone: High Desert SP (Sara.Malone@cdcr.ca.gov); Gabriel Vela: CA Corr Inst (Gabriel.Vela@cdcr.ca.gov); Jean Weiss: Pelican Bay SP (Jean.Weiss@cdcr.ca.gov); Cherita Wofford: CA SATF (Cherita.Wofford@cdcr.ca.gov); Sonya Valle: Kern Valley SP (Sonya.Valle@cdcr.ca.gov). Dated at George, South Africa, Pale Blue Dot: 25 February 2014

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se PO Box 4052, George, 6539 South Africa, Tel/Fax: (044) 870 7239 jmcswan@mweb.co.za

http://usun.state.gov/about/contact/index.htm https://oag.ca.gov/services-info/17209-brief/add 3 http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php 2