Can I use one single database such as PubMed to identify articles for my review? – Tutors India

CAN I USE ONE SINGLE DATABASE SUCH AS PUBMED TO IDENTIFY ARTICLES FOR MY REVIEW An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, Tutors India Group www.tutorsindia.com Email: info@tutorsindia.com

Today's Discussion OUTLIN E

In Brief Introductio n Developing Strategies for Search Finding out appropriate references for reviews that are published Conclusion Future Scope

In Brief Multiple databases should be used when you search for the pertinent resources for your systematic review. You need to develop strategies so that you can gain access to several databases in a short period. PubMed is not the only option, you can access other databases like MEDLINE, embase.com etc.

Introductio n It is recommended to make use of several databases while searching for relevant resources for your systematic review.

Nevertheless, database search is a toilsome job and eats up lot of time because syntax of search methods are specific to the database.

Therefore your aim should be to go for an optimized combo of databases to perform proficient searching in your systematic reviews and whether the ongoing practices of published reviews are right or not.

Developing Strategies for Literature Search Comprehensive analysis search strategies are also developed by a search service that is managed by the librarian.

This process of scanning literature and a realistic examination of it was presented in different review papers.

In brief, the approach is an easy way to incorporate the words of the thesaurus and the phrases title / abstract into a single line search technique.

The review assignments embrace a bigger variety of subjects, from healing efficiency and diagnostic accurateness to morals and community health.

Contd..

Upon conclusion of the search, the complete results of all the repositories used for each of the systematic reviews were imported into a special EndNote repository and stored for this study without reduplication.

The researchers who requested the search received a reduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant to their systematic review for inclusion.

Finding out Appropriate References Reviews written were used if the analysis methods and findings were reported at the time of the latest change and if the websites Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were included in the review at least.

We extracted the list of Final Included References from the published journal article.

We defined specific MeSH terms relating to the most important disease and intervention discussed in the article in order to categorize the categories of patient / population and reaction.

We have chosen the field from a pre-determined set of wide domains that includes therapy, epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis.

Conclusio n We suggest that if you are searching for systematic reviews in biomedicine or any other subject, you should at least include a combination of Pubmed, MEDLINE ,Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.

Cochrane CENTRAL may likewise be-- helpful for studies where RCTs are the preferred study design.

Ignoring one or more respiratory we mentioned as the four prime databases will give you more specific searches with reduced number of results.

Future Scope Future research should continue to explore the recollection of individual queries outside the domain scope and should suggest concentrating on the most appropriate combinations of databases rather than specific databases.

CONTACT US UNITED KINGDOM

+441143520021 INDIA

+914448137070 EMAIL