Washington Sub Mitigated Negative Dec

Page 48

4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES

Potentially Significant Impact

Would the Project:

Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated

Less Than Significant Impact

No Impact

a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?

SETTING No mineral resources exist in the proposed project area.

DISCUSSION a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact No mineral resources exist within the project area, and no impact will occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact The proposed project is not located in an area delineated as a locally-important mineral resource recovery site.

Turlock Irrigation District Washington Substation IS/MND

May 2016

[43]


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.