2010-9-27.pdf

Page 1

Showers 63/60

THE TUFTS DAILY

VOLUME LX, NUMBER 12

TUFTSDAILY.COM

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2010

Neighbors have a Jumbo load of fun

Where You Read It First Est. 1980

Errors mar elections, students say Under fire, ECOM defends itself from criticism BY

MATT REPKA

Daily Editorial Board

AALOK KANANI/TUFTS DAILY

Residents from surrounding communities, including the girl playing with Jumbo above, came to the Hill yesterday to participate in a variety of fun and informational activities. The events took place as part of Tufts’ eighth annual Community Day, aimed at enhancing town-gown relations.

ExCollege class gets hands dirty in community garden BY

BETH MEBRATU

Daily Staff Writer

Tufts’ student garden, established last fall with an eye toward bringing people together to grow food, has given rise this year to a new Experimental College (ExCollege) class on agricultural issues. Yosefa Ehrlich (LA ’10) and senior Signe Porteshawver applied last year to create an ExCollege course on food and agriculture as a way of strengthening their efforts to bring gardening to Tufts. The result, Emerging Alternatives in Modern Agriculture, explores food systems, agricultural productivity and alternative farming ideas. “We wanted a way to institutionalize the garden to ensure it would survive beyond us and to get more people involved in the process,”

Porteshawver said. Two Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy graduate students, Marisol Pierce-Quinonez and Jeffrey Hake, teach the class. Both are pursuing degrees in Agriculture, Food and Environment. “We hope to have students learn about the topics and use their skills to change the garden here,” PierceQuinonez said. Hake said that there are currently no other classes offered to undergraduates on agricultural issues. The ExCollege class, he said, attempts to fill that gap. “There is nothing even close,” Hake said, referring to the course’s curriculum. “The other day we did a lecture on agricultural history in an hour see GARDEN, page 2

In the wake of elections marked by advertising missteps and the postponement of a vote for freshman senators, the body that oversees student voting at Tufts has come under fire from former candidates and current student government officials. The Elections Commission (ECOM) has incurred criticism for its handling of several aspects of last week’s election, from accusations of poor advertising on TuftsLife and in the Daily to charges that the commission failed to adequately inform freshman candidates of election procedures. The entire student body cast ballots on Wednesday in a seamless election on two competing referenda on community representatives on the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate. A vote for freshman senator and Freshman Class Council positions was scheduled for the same day but was postponed for 24 hours due to an error by ECOM. That vote progressed smoothly the following day, but candidates and student government officials in the last few days have charged ECOM with mishandling aspects of the electoral process. While acknowledging certain mistakes, ECOM members generally defended the body’s conduct, attributing some of its actions to inexperience and miscommunication with student groups. ECOM is comprised of five student members and is responsible for organizing and presiding over student body-wide elections. Members receive a stipend of $500 at the end of each semester. In the days preceding any vote, ECOM is tasked with publiciz-

ing the vote to the student body. Language in its bylaws differs by type of election; for TCU candidate elections, ECOM must advertise through “several methods of advertising, both online and offline,” according to its bylaws. Candidates cite lack of communication Candidates and non-candidates alike cited problems communicating with ECOM in the days preceding the election. Freshman Noha Ahmed, who was elected Freshman Class Council secretary, said she had trouble getting information from ECOM members. “I wasn’t informed about one of the meetings that I was supposed to attend, and I know a lot of candidates weren’t informed either,” she said. “I got one email at 10:30 [p.m.] saying I had to get a poster design in by 12 that night,” Ahmed said. “When I came to drop it off, there was no one in the ECOM office. “Other people ended up dropping it off in the info booth,” Ahmed added, referring to the booth in the Mayer Campus Center lobby. “A lot of people handed them stuff, and they were pissed off because they’re not part of ECOM,” Ahmed said. Freshman Sarah Tralins, a candidate for vice president of social programming, also had trouble gaining approvals for her fliers. “I had to go to the ECOM office four times before I actually got my posters stamped because classes conflicted,” Tralins said. “They weren’t very helpful about informing us about when to meet them or where.” “It was very chaotic and the process was not fun,” Ahmed said. ECOM Chair Katherine McManus said information about poster deadlines “was made abun-

dantly clear at the candidates meeting.” ECOM’s bylaws say that candidates must submit posters for review at a mandatory candidates general interest meeting. Some candidates said they were not adequately informed about the general interest meetings themselves; ECOM held two meetings this year. “ECOM is responsible for coordinating this meeting and generating sufficient awareness thereof,” the commission’s bylaws state. Freshman Simmone Seymour, who on Thursday was elected the vice president of academic affairs on the Freshman Class Council, said the publicity of the meeting times was unclear and that “no one knew them.” “The only reason I knew was from work of mouth,” Seymour said. “The meeting turned out to be mandatory, but no one knew that.” Tralins and Ahmed said candidates who missed this meeting were denied chalk for advertising by ECOM. Freshman Scott Owades, who ran unsuccessfully for class council president, agreed, saying he was “luckily walking by when it happened” and had not been told about them in advance. McManus disagreed. “Those were well-advertised,” she said, referring to the general interest meetings. McManus said meeting information was posted on the ECOM website in advance of the meetings. “I can understand why some of the candidates might be frustrated, but ECOM has always tried to make ourselves available,” sophomore Will Yu, ECOM’s public relations director, said. see ECOM, page 2

Tufts, Harvard report endowment turnarounds, financial improvements BY

BRIONNA JIMERSON Daily Staff Writer

Harvard University reported an 11 percent gain earlier this month on its investments in the 2010 fiscal year, increasing its endowment by $1.4 billion to a total of $27.4 billion. Tufts’ own endowment increased by $110 million in fiscal year 2010, evidence that the university is on sounder financial ground after a 25 percent decrease in fiscal year 2009, according to Director of Public Relations Kim Thurler. Tufts’ total endowment now stands at more than $1.252 billion, Thurler said. This year’s endowment gains, a 9.7 percent increase, signify an investment return rate of approximately 12 percent. The university sets the baseline goal of a 9 percent return rate, Thurler said. Harvard’s investment gains mark a major turnaround from the endowment’s decline by 27.3 percent to $25.7 billion in fiscal year 2009. Harvard Management Company, which manages Harvard’s endowment, has produced an average annual return from the endowment of 7 percent over the last 10 years and 11.9 percent over the last two decades, according to the Harvard Gazette.

A Harvard spokesperson said that the public is often misinformed about the nature of university endowments. “The Harvard endowment actually consists of more than 11,000 separate funds, and nearly three-fourths of these are designated for specific purposes,” John Longbrake, Harvard’s assistant vice president of communications, said. Longbrake said the endowment’s performance was crucial in ensuring financial support for Harvard’s programs. “Harvard spends more than $3 billion a year in support of teaching and research, and more than a third of this comes from interest earned on the endowment’s performance,” he said. At Tufts, University President Lawrence Bacow said in a Sept. 8 e-mail to the Tufts community that the university’s cautious financial management has ensured financial stability throughout the economic downturn. “The last two academic years were inescapably overshadowed by financial concerns,” Bacow said in the e-mail. “Fortunately, our tradition of careful financial management stood us in good stead last year.” Tufts will continue to monitor the finan-

Inside this issue

DAILY FILE PHOTO

Harvard University saw an 11 percent increase in its endowment in fiscal year 2010. cial situation before launching any major capital projects, Bacow said. Chief Investment Officer Sally Duncan referred questions regarding Tufts’ finances to the Office of Public Relations. “Tufts is in a very solid position financial-

ly,” Thurler said. “Our tradition of prudent financial management stood us in good stead during [the] economic downturn ... We have fared comparatively well relative to many of our peer institutions, as a result of our successful stewardship of resources.”

Today’s Sections

New York Fashion Week saw styles recalling the ’70s and ’90s.

William Inge’s ‘Bus Stop’ charms with its portrayal of an eclectic group of travelers.

see FEATURES, page 3

see ARTS, page 5

News Features Arts | Living Comics

1 3 5 7

Editorial | Letters Op-Ed Classifieds Sports

8 9 10 Back


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.