When contemporary art is memory By Myriam Dao for Association d’Amitie Franco - Vietnamienne| Translated by Tran Vinh An Link to the original French Publication AAFV | August 29, 2015 It is not enough to be an artist of today to be "contemporary artist". If modern art undermines academicism, contemporary art goes further still, deconstructing discourse and references, not only those of the history of art, but also those of society. In this, it is certainly "post-colonial" in the direction of Postmodernism. Some appeared in the year 1945 (G.A.Tiberghien), but more than the works of contemporary art, is the manner in which they are exposed, which defines a new paradigm in rupture with Western-centric vision, taken often as universalist (Thomas McEvilley). In summary, it is the "curatorial" attitude, the bringing together of works with a stated objective (Khai Hori at the Palais de Tokyo), with 'Archipelago Secret', or yet Okwui Enwezor with "All the World's future", currently on display at the Venice Biennale), which gives this "label". It seems today that the commissioners’ exposure or "curators" and contemporary artists draw their arguments both in the politics, history, philosophy and anthropology. When official or family memory is failing, there is a duty to invent. Contemporary artists of the Viet Nam and the diaspora we present here seize this issue. All attempt to present the unspoken and/or deconstruct representations of conflict – illustrated in the press “ad nauseam” - substituting metaphorical or poetic visions, assuming their subjectivity. Whether or the artist and their works derive from the North or the South is of no matter: art is a plural language. Thus, from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City, from old Europe to Los Angeles, artists have inherited from fragments of history that is necessary to make visible and to transmit these messages.