Togatus acknowledges the Palawa people of Lutruwita. we recognise that sovereignty was never ceded. We pay our deep respects and are committed to working with the Palawa community.
Founded in 1931 and originally called the Platypus, Togatus has been the voice of Tasmanian students for almost 100 years. Founded, and consistently supported by, the Tasmanian University Students Association (formerly the TUU), Togatus is run by students for students.
We are committed to providing a voice for all students, staff, and community members of our island University. We provide consistent and reliable content to our community. We have an editorial team of six people and have moved to a pool of casual contributors this year. Empowering students to write on topics they are passionate about in an autonomous manner. We cover topics from current news to poetry and our submissions are always open via our email. We are the student voice of Tasmania, something worth talking about.
Thank You
To begin, we want to extend our deepest gratitude to everyone who has contributed to, and supported TOGATUS throughout this year. To all our writers, readers, supporters, and the wider UTAS communitythank you for engaging with our publication. 2025 has been a monumental year for students, staff, and the paper itself, and none of our achievements would have been possible without each and every one of you.
As a publication, our readership and engagement have continued to grow, both in numbers and in the quality of content we produce. Semester 2 brought with it an exciting rebrand and relaunch, which helped us reach an even broader audience. Maintaining our fortnightly publishing schedule, this magazine marks our 14th and final issue for the year. While we are sad to bring this chapter to a close, we are incredibly proud of how far TOGATUS has come and all that we have accomplished in 2025.
Our success is a testament to the tireless efforts of the entire TOGATUS team, the unwavering support of TUSA, and the invaluable contributions from our writers. Our team’s dedication shines through in the quality, depth, and timely nature of every issue. TUSA’s ongoing organizational support has ensured smooth administration throughout the year. Additionally, the entire UTAS community has championed our journalistic independence and academic integrity, reinforcing the values that define our publication.
To all our contributors: your diverse, thoughtful, and inspiring work has been the heart of this paper. We are immensely grateful for your voices and stories, and we hope that we have done justice to your efforts through our work. It is our sincere hope that the passion and drive behind TOGATUS will continue to thrive well into 2026 and beyond.
Finally, I and the TOGATUS team want to give a special and heartfelt thank you to our Editor-in-Chief, Evelyn. Taking on the monumental task of steering TOGATUS this year- from spearheading the rebrand and the rebuild of the website, to engaging with the UTAS community, securing sponsorship, and guiding our team- her leadership has been nothing short of revolutionary. Evelyn’s vision and dedication have shaped TOGATUS into what it is today, and for that, we are eternally grateful.
Thank you all once again for being part of this incredible journey XOXO
Beth,DeputyEditor-in-Chief
WhoreallyisourVice Rufus Black has steered U controversies, but what do
Recently I had the opportunity to sit down with the Vice-Chancellor and chat about some of the topics that are impacting our student body. Professor Black and I chatted for about 45 minutes on a large range of topics.
After being swiped into the Admin building we headed into the ViceChancellor’s meeting room. Under the gaze of Terry Ngamadara’s ochre on bark from Maningrida in the Northern Territory, we got straight to it.
Going into this interview I knew I didn’t want to be too rigid in my thoughts, I wanted to keep an open perspective and not hold a pre-established opinion, considering I am a member of the student body myself. That being said, I knew this interview opportunity was an uncommon level of access for student journalism, so I felt a responsibility to the student body to ask those really important questions. Overall, I can say honestly that this was a very insightful interview. Specifically, Professor Black’s highly nuanced and insightful perspectives on the issues
that are actually relevant to his student body. In the areas that most ViceChancellors would lack, ours rose, showing genuine care and compassion for this community.
We started our discussion with arguably one of the most current topics for UTAS students; the city-move. After agreeing with my remark on the contentiousness of the city-move, the Vice-Chancellor talked about the broader history of the move. Outlining how it has been a progressive process occurring since the early 2000s. Black stated that in 2018 when the decision was made “about 40% of students were already there (in the city)”. It was also noted how accessibility was an element that was strongly considered in the university’s decision, as well as the priority of “having everyone together”. Black outlined that in 2018 the University Council decided “on-balance” that it was better to commence the city-move then. Now, this explanation of the decision making process is not necessarily anything particularly new. However, what was interesting was his highlight that Hobart figuring out
e-Chancellor? TAS through many
oes
he really think?
“what its future will be as a city” was an impacting factor, in regard to “things like this becoming extra contentious”. I couldn’t help but wonder what he was inferring to within that statement. Whether it was a reference to current uncertainties such as the proposed stadium.
“if a city is going to debate bikes lanes, they’re going to debate just about everything”
A particularly interesting part of our discussion was when I asked our ViceChancellor about the Law School’s refusal to move into the city. Black rebutted by conferring that the refusal was related to concerns regarding the “management of the Law School at the time”, rather than the physical relocation.
I asked this question in light of the open letter that was sent to the Premier, Jeremy Rockliff, in October 2022. This letter was signed by 22 prominent Tasmanian Lawyers and community members, including the then Tasmania University Law Society (TULS) President Fletcher Clarke. The
letter’s primary concern were the forcast impacts of the proposed move of the Law School into the city, although it did raise minor concerns regarding the management of the Law School at the time. This letter, and the social push back that it caused, is arguably what resulted in the decision for the Law School to stay at Sandy Bay. So ultimately, I could not agree with his statement that the Law School’s public commentary was primarily about the management at the time. Commentary that would be equally as relevant today.
Moving forward, we discussed the process of authentic and genuine community consultations and the use of social media as an element of this. The Vice-Chancellor discussed how he believes that they (the university) make ‘a lot more use of it now’. A statement I found interesting considering the university’s student
communication, specifically information delivery via social media, was notably absent during the recent CALE Change Proposal community consultation. He however did agree that it (social media) might be ‘important to have in the discussion’.
authenticity to Tasmania, and the communities which the university is situated within.
“The social media world has continued to evolve dramatically since those changes happened … more complex, more messy”
So whilst I don’t think we’ll be seeing a Tasmanian equivalent of Bill Shorten’s UC TikToks, I believe there is an argument that UTAS needs to more adequately meet the student body halfway in their communication habits and adapt to the reality of the social age that we live in today.
Continuing on, the Vice-Chancellor did consistently champion the importance of plurality in these discussions. Throughout the entire interview his perspectives were refreshingly modern. We went on to talk about sustainability and the importance of climate action within our community. As well as the importance of community programs such as the Food Hub, run by TUSA. We also discussed what ‘success’ looks like within our UTAS community. Specifically, when asked about the low educational rankings of TSBE (formerly COBE), he highlighted his preference and priority of student happiness and postgraduation employment; highlighting UTAS’ very high employment and student satisfaction rates. A focus that emanates a genuine
That being said, there were moments where he lost me. Specifically his conclusions, and from my perspective, the insinuation that the reduction in federal government funding is solely responsible for all the recent controversy within the university community. Whilst I agree, to an extent, with his inference and acknowledge that these external factors have had drastic impacts on the tertiary sector model, it felt a bit like a sweeping statement, a method of analysis we are discouraged from in our own assessment. The glimmers of nuance that he did provide were genuinely fascinating takes on current situations, but they were quickly remasked by corporate ‘go-to’s’.
In a way I think that our conversation was very representative of Rufus Black as a person; a confluence of the inquisitive Liberal Arts of his Oxford Moral Theology degree, folded with the very successful McKinsey consultant and Deloitte Board Member background. I realised that Professor Black would simultaneously ‘fit-in’ at a climate change rally on Parliament Lawns as well as a suit-clad Melbourne Board Room. Whilst when viewed through a progressive university student lens, Professor Black presents
as conservative; in a room with other Australian Vice-Chancellors, he would probably seem very ‘Tasmanian’. This begs the question, which is better, and who do we want as our ViceChancellor?
I couldn’t help but leave with a slight feeling of uncertainty and a multifaceted wish that I had been shown his full perspective rather than the PRprepped Vice-Chancellor, the side more frequently shown.
Ultimately, realising I wished this could have been a triptych of interviews: one ten years ago, now, and ten years in the future. At the end of the day, I hope more students get to meet the ViceChancellor but I also hope more students get to meet Rufus Black.
JaneFranklinH
EvelynUnwinTew
Recently Jane Franklin Hall underwent a significant rebranding. This included a new logo, merch, taglines, and digital marketing, but most importantly, a new name. Jane.
The previous name, Jane Franklin Hall, was inspired by the late Lady Jane Franklin, the wife of Sir John Franklin. However, as stated on their website this rebrand was incentivised to ‘reflect more clearly its (Jane) contemporary identity and values’. Jane Franklin Hall started as an all female residential college in 1950. A foot in the door for women in Tasmania to have access to tertiary education. A heritage that Jane proudly holds, as extrapolated within the ‘heritage’ section of their new website, and through murals that have recently been installed throughout the College. In recent years we have seen increasing conversation, not just in our state but around the world, regarding how to appropriately reconcile with places’ colonial histories. While Jane has a rich heritage of female education, one to be proud of, it is also inextricably linked to the history of one of Tasmania’s most influential colonisers.
This situation raises these aforementioned questions. How do we move forward as a society with a brutal colonial past?
Other situations in Hobart have also been at the apex of this question. Just last year, the statue of William Crowther in Franklin Square (yes, the same Franklin), was cut down at his ankles in the night. While this was an unofficial act, the Hobart City Council was just the next day taking a vote regarding the removal of the Crowther statue. This act ultimately caused many mixed reactions and for many engaged them in this discussion for the first time. This news was hot on Hobartians lips, and so were the accompanying questions. Some were ardently in support while others were happy with the outcome but wanted a different process. Descendants of Crowther spoke out, and so did representatives of the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre. It seemed that even those that agreed on their preferred outcome, disagreed on the process. Highlighting the pandora’s box of anti-concensism that shrouds this social issue.
Hall,nomore
Other states that hold brutal histories have also had to grapple with this question. For example, since the 1950s Germany has had clear and explicit Holocaust history interwoven within its society. This ranges from pieces of cultural heritage such as statues, remembrances, or gardens, to the inclusion of this history within their school curriculums. However, while the brutality can be comparable, the colonial invasion in Tasmania cannot be identically compared to the Holocaust. Apart from the lack of unanimous condemnation, it would also be reductive and simplistic to try and identically align the colonisation that occurred in Tasmania with the actions which occurred during World War 2.
Whilst it has received mixed reviews within the student and alumni body, personally, I believe the intention behind the rebrand is a positive step. Socio-cultural educational institutions such as Jane often have a much larger impact than many are aware of. Many of Tasmania’s future Professionals, Politicians, and community figures will come from the halls of Jane. The
attitudes and opinions that they are exposed to during their time there will directly influence many of the decisions they make in the future.
While I think the rebrand of Jane is overall a good thing, I know the next person (maybe even you reading this) will disagree, that’s the reality of social issues. Importantly though, while I ultimately support the rebrand, I believe that Jane has a responsibility to ensure that its past heritage isn't forgotten in favour of its new brand or a ‘preferable heritage’. Because while a world where genocide didn’t occur inTasmania would be preferable (but not for all), that’s just not the world we live in, and continued recognition is one of the first steps for progress.
This rebrand is evidence of the Jane community’s desire for reconciliation and genuine progress. It shows the modern establishment and community it has become and the direction it is continuing to grow in. At the end of the day, the path of reconciliation can easily merge with the path of concealment, and it’s important to continue to be aware which path you are walking down.
ErinCoull
2025 has been a big year for students across UTAS. From Sandy Bay to Rozelle, Cradle Coast to Inveresk, we’ve seen students come together to shape a campus culture that’s inclusive, vibrant, and full of possibility Whether through leadership, creativity, or community, this year has shown what’s possible when students are given the space and support to lead The Tasmanian University Student Association (TUSA), the State Council, and the team behind Togatus have worked hard to be part of that momentum, and it’s been a privilege to watch it unfold.
A New Era for Togatus
Let’s start with the publication you’re holding (or reading online!) Togatus has had a huge glow-up this year, thanks to the leadership of Editor-in-Chief Evelyn Unwin Tew and her brilliant team It’s no longer a bi-annual student magazine, it’s a platform that’s bold, relevant, and not afraid to dig into the real stuff students care about. With a 170% increase in physical circulation, Togatus has become a trusted voice for UTAS students. From stories on the cost-of-living stress to coverage of campus life, it’s now a cornerstone of student media Evelyn and the team have expanded print editions, grown digital reach, and made sure student journalism is thriving Congrats Team!
State Council: Leading with Purpose
The 2025 TUSA State Council has been nothing short of impressive. Led by President Jack Oates Pryor and General Secretary Belle Smith, the Council has worked hard to make sure student voices are heard loud and clear They’ve launched campaigns on gender-based violence, pushed for equity in online learning, and contributed to major frameworks like the Reconciliation Action Plan and Disability Inclusion Action Plan. It’s been student-led change at its best.
TUSA: Funded, Focused, and Future-Ready
This year also marks a turning point for TUSA With 40% SSAF funding finally secured, we’ve been able to fund our core programs properly, for the first time in decades That means we’re no longer just surviving, we’re growing
Here’s a snapshot of what the Team has worked hard to deliver:
Food Security Program expanded to all major campuses, including Food Hub, food education, community lunches and the free brekkie program
Mental Health First Aid, Student Advocacy and Legal Services delivered at scale Clubs & Societies thriving more than ever, with tens of thousands of student engagements, and more to come
Online program, including the Discord Server, Distance UTE and dedicated online/distance event funding for Clubs & Societies
Student Life: Activated and Empowered
From the iconic Clubs & Societies Day, Unique Tassie Experiences Program, SHAG Week, Adulting 101 workshops and the Self Care Fair, students have jumped into opportunities to connect, learn, and lead. Additionally, the Student Media Team, Equity Committee, and TUSA Student Experience Leaders have helped shape a campus culture that’s welcoming and safe
Looking Ahead
2025 reminded us just how much students can achieve when they’re supported to lead and shape their own experience. As we head into 2026, we’ll keep building a UTAS community where every student feels they belong, their voice matters, and they can be proud of what we create together. To Evelyn and the Togatus team, thank you for telling our stories To the State Council, thank you for showing up and speaking out To the TUSA Team who have worked tirelessly for the student community, and to every student who joined a club, came to an event, or grabbed a meal at the Food Hub, this year was yours.
Here’s to what’s next. We’re just getting started. Shauna-Lee, TUSA General Manager
The 19thofSeptembermarkedanotheryear of the Tasmanian University Law Society showing off their relentless network, diplomatic flattery, and notorious determination (don’t worry, we need it xx) with the return of the Honourable Justice MichaelKirby.
Known for his numerous roles with the United Nations, being Australia’s longestserving High Court Judge, and progressive politics, His Honour graced our University’s law students with a 1 hour lecture. During the lecture he spoke about the judicial leeways of choice, memories serving on the High Court, the importance of dissent, and humble brags of his actions in office Sadly, (and more so embarrassingly) it appeared to me that His Honour was not thrilled, to say the least, to answer any sort of questions for Tassie’s only student newspaper. With answers like “no” and “you have to ask law students”, I wish I could write about how it’s important to get more praised members of the law community down here in Tasmania, but I guess that will be up for your imagination. Who knows, maybe he just got flashbacks to his time in student politics back in Sydney.
Thiswasn’tthefirsttimeHisHonour
blessed Tasmanian law students with his presence, however, this might be my favourite (first, and last). From TULS President, Ash Burke, collecting his Honour from the airport, to rushing to find juice (if you know, you know), to the humbling reality that His Honour doesn’t actually like BBQs, in true TULS fashion, His Honour waswellandtrulywelcomed.
For the non-law fiends reading, His Honour Michael Kirby is a rather decorated lawyer. What got my respect was his work with the World Health Organisation. From 19881992, he served as the commissioner for the Global Mission on AIDs, promoting the rights of HIV/AIDs sufferers against discrimination He spent his career holding the value that lawyers should stand up for their values in the right cases, and eventually received many honours recognising his service to the law and advancementofhumanrights
Regardless of my own humiliating journalistic defeat, with laughter from law students filling up lecture theatre two and numerous hands up for question time, I’m sure His Honour inspired the next generationofeagerTasmanianlawyers.
(and yes, this is Times New Roman)
Very few student journalists in other states would have the opportunity to interview the Governor about their role and experience; and yet, on a sunny day in September, we were driving up to the service entrance of Government House armed with notepads and pens with our only backup being that of pre-interview jitters
Her Excellency, the Honourable Barbara Baker AC, sat down with us, over tea and biscuits, to talk about the importance of her constitutional role and how her experiences at UTAS shaped the way in which she approaches her viceregal responsibilities
We got straight into the questions, discussing what Her Excellency's experience at university was like “Well, actually, I started at university when I was quite young I wasn’t quite sure what I wanted to do, so I was very fortunate to be enrolled in a combined degree in Arts and Law You may not know this, but UTAS was actually one of the first universities to offer combined degrees, so I was really fortunate in that.” Her Excellency also talked about how interesting of a time it was to be at university studying political science and the law She noted that “it was 1975 and I recall coming out of an exam at the end of first year of university to be told that the Governor-General had just sacked
In convers
the Prime Minister I was studying political science and psychology as my major, so from my perspective that was a very interesting time to be studying.”
We found this a particularly wholesome and relatable notion The perspective of major events occurring while you’re at university, potentially even studying subjects that relate to the event. Her Excellency also not only touched on what she was studying, but who she was studying with. “Free education had also just been brought in and so there was a great amount of diversity in the students, particularly a large number of mature age students So, it was a really exciting time to be at university.” Something that we both vehemently agree with having seen how rich our classes are as a result of our diverse student body.
Her Excellency continued this perspective when we asked her what her favourite part of uni was She noted meeting lots of different students from different faculties as a highlight and also commented on how she “probably found her Arts subjects a bit more interesting than the Law subjects” (‘#arts4eva’Evelyn) When asked what her favourite subject was, she paused for a moment, potentially considering, before highlighting that she ‘really enjoyed Environmental Law, which was a new subject back then…It was also quite topical, because that was at the time
ation with Her Excellency, the Governor
Jamie Nash & Evelyn Unwin Tew
there were questions over the damming of the Franklin River.” Afterwards particularly noting that her psychology subjects were probably the ones she ‘enjoyed the most’.
After discussing her university days, we continued on to cover her role and involvement in the recent early election held in the middle of this year
When asked how she saw her role she particularly noted the “constitutional functions and conventions” she needed to follow. She mentioned the Premier’s request to dissolve the House of Assembly and to call an election, saying she had to consider this request carefully, “and in doing that determine whether or not we could avoid an election by having an alternative government appointed” When she determined this was not possible, she agreed to the Premier’s request. When we asked her what she considered when making the decision to issue the writs, she noted that she looked back on her considerations for the 2024 election: “that was an early election and I had to consider whether or not that election should go ahead, [but] it was a little bit different because the Parliament was still continuing and there hadn’t
been a no-confidence motion”
We also asked her if there was any advice she had received previously or if there was anyone she consulted during the period and Her Excellency quite enthusiastically referred to The Veiled Sceptre. As she described, it is a “book by the wonderful Constitutional Law Professor Anne Twomey” which goes through all the elements of Constitutional Law that apply For us, it was so fascinating to be able to see that thought process that Her Excellency considered and how meticulous she was with her decision. She made sure to dot all her i’s and cross all her t’s Something that particularly stood out to us was how Her Excellency balanced her responsibility and role to ensure constitutional enactment without breaching any boundary of involvement
You would have no idea what Her Excellency’s personal political preference is but simultaneously there’s no doubt that she was entirely across all the elements of the situation
Another thing that we were particularly interested to discuss with Her Excellency was the public perception and relevancy of her role. That some people view the
That some people view the role of the Governor as either outdated and unnecessary or are unaware that it exists entirely. As is clear, the Governor plays an integral formal and practical role in the execution of the constitution within our state To go past the formalities, we considered what the past 12 months of political upheaval would have looked like without the Governor, and in many ways we were unsure if our constitutional rights would have been as protected without Her Excellency. So why hasn’t this translated into amazing PR in the past? Her Excellency touched on the perception of her role, noting that the focus on her role recently “during the process of calling the election and commissioning the Premier, (helped) to highlight the Constitutional role” Noting that even some lawyers don’t fully understand elements of her role
We believe something else to consider is the intention of the Governor’s role Ultimately, it is not a self-serving position, and many Governors have been former lawmakers themselves. It is inherently not a publicly perceived role. What we mean by that is not that there isn’t public impact, but there isn’t a need for public praise Her Excellency is not elected by the public, therefore, as she acts for the people consistently, she does not need to tell the people she is acting for them She is a public servant through her actions not through her statements or photo opportunities. She also touched on the involvement of the Governor within civics education in Tasmania Noting that 429 students and Youth Parliament Tasmania have visited Government
House recently, with Her Excellency also visiting other schools in-person After chatting with Her Excellency we got to meet her two beautiful border collies Oskar & Nala, followed by a walkand-talk around the House with her husband, University of Tasmania Emeritus Professor Donald Chalmers AO. One of the things we loved that he mentioned to us was Government House’s Vineyard. With Riesling, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot grapes grown there last year, producing about 3,500 bottles of wine
Overall, so many of the things that Her Excellency discussed with us were very relatable. In a way this surprised us, but on reflection Her Excellency is genuinely Tasmanian While this link is explicit in her ideology and thought process surrounding her role and responsibility to the people of Tasmania, this link was weaved implicitly throughout our entire conversation Her love of local artwork was evident in the pieces we walked past in the hallways, her experience with Tasmania was evident in her application of the law, and her subscription to the community was evident in the very anecdotes she shared from her life. If there is one person truly weaved into the fabric of Tasmania, it is Her Excellency. While some people may agree or disagree with the notion of the Monarchy and what that represents, Her Excellency advocates for the equity and representation of all Tasmanians. So next time you have a community event or milestone, hit up Government House In every manner, it is a building for the people
Tasmania’s 2026 Rhodes Scholar Heath Dimsey
On the 2nd of October Heath Dimsey was announced as Tasmania’s 2026 Rhodes Scholar.
This scholarship will fully support Heath in studying at Oxford next year. We chatted with him about what he’s excited about and what he might miss.
What originally made you interested in applying for the Rhodes Scholarship?
Several factors drew me to apply for the Rhodes Scholarship. Firstly, the opportunity to study at a world-class university alongside academics I deeply admire was a major motivation. Having completed my entire academic journey so far at the University of Tasmania, the prospect of continuing my studies at another institution – especially one with the global reputation and intellectual community of Oxford –was incredibly exciting. I was also
drawn to the diversity of people and perspectives that Oxford attracts, and the chance to learn within such a dynamic environment.
Beyond the academic appeal, there were also some personal reasons that made the Rhodes particularly enticing. I’ve always loved the UK, and the scholarship felt like a wonderful opportunity to experience living there and travelling more widely across Europe. I’m also passionate about soccer (or football, as I’ll have to
start calling it in England!) and look forward to both playing and watching matches in the sport’s birthplace. Finally, I’ve always been fascinated by the history and architecture of Oxford, the idea of studying in buildings that have stood for centuries and being part of such a rich collegiate tradition is such a unique opportunity.
Can you give us more detail about what you plan to study at Oxford and what you hope to get out of it?
At Oxford, I plan to undertake two one-year master’s degrees in applied mathematics: the Master in Mathematical Sciences and the Master in Mathematical Modelling and Scientific Computing. Both programs combine coursework and research, which I’m particularly looking forward to, as this balance will allow me to broaden my mathematical expertise while developing as an independent researcher. The first course will give me the flexibility to strengthen areas of applied mathematics where I feel less experienced and to explore new topics beyond my current PhD research focus. The second course is the one I’m most excited about, as it centres on mathematical modelling – an area that aligns closely with my longterm goal of working in
mathematical conservation. I’m also eager to develop stronger computational skills through this program, as this is an aspect I’ve only begun to explore during my studies at the University of Tasmania and is becoming an ever more important tool in applied mathematics and modelling.
In recent years there has been some criticism of Cecil Rhodes and the continuation of the scholarship. What is your response to this?
I think the criticism of Cecil Rhodes and the scholarship’s origins is both valid and necessary. It’s important that we confront and reflect on the colonial history and inequities that Rhodes himself was a part of, rather than ignoring or sanitising them.
At the same time, I see the modern Rhodes Scholarship as something that has evolved far beyond its founder’s intentions. The Trust has actively sought to acknowledge this complex history and redefine the scholarship’s mission - focusing on fostering global understanding, service, and leadership aimed at addressing the very injustices that once characterised the imperial world.
and leadership aimed at addressing the very injustices that once characterised the imperial world.
For me, being a Rhodes Scholar is not about celebrating Cecil Rhodes, but about using the opportunity to work toward a more equitable and sustainable future. I think part of honouring this scholarship responsibly is to carry it forward with a critical awareness of its past - using the platform it provides to challenge inequality and contribute positively to the world.
What’s something that you’ll miss about Hobart?
I love every aspect of Hobart, so I’m sure there will be many things I’ll miss – some I probably won’t even realise until I’m away. One thing that immediately comes to mind is the easy access to nature. Being able to drive 30 minutes to a national park or five minutes to a beach is something truly unique about Hobart, and Tasmania more broadly. That connection to the outdoors has always been an important part of my life.
That said, part of the appeal of Oxford is that it reminds me of Hobart in some ways; a smaller, close-knit city with plenty of green spaces and a lot of cold weather
to make it feel familiar.
On a more personal note, I know I’ll really miss my family, partner, and friends. Being away from them for such a long time is probably the most daunting part of moving overseas.
Can you tell us more about how you found the application process?
The Rhodes Scholarship application process is probably the most intense one I’ve gone through, but strangely, also one of the most enjoyable. It begins with a written application, which requires five reference letters (three academic and two community), a CV, academic transcripts, and personal and academic statements.
After the written application, there’s a shortlisting process. Typically, about five or six candidates are selected. If you make it through, you are invited to a dinner at Government House hosted by the Tasmanian Governor. This is one of the coolest and most unique parts of the Rhodes experience.
At the dinner, you meet the selection committee and your fellow candidates. While the intention of the dinner is to be
stress free and to help you relax ahead of the interviews the following day, there’s still the challenge of eating fancy food politely while trying to network effectively!
The following day is the interview, also held at Government House and chaired by the Governor. This year, the committee included six members, supervised by the Rhodes Australia Deputy National Secretary and the Tasmanian Rhodes Secretary, which can feel a little daunting. The questions cover a broad range of topics, requiring you to draw on personal experiences as well as critical thinking skills. While the interview is naturally stressful, it’s a fantastic experience as it encourages deep reflection on your values and goals, and in hindsight, is surprisingly enjoyable.
The process concludes that afternoon with a ceremony at Government House where the successful candidate is announced, which is a wonderfully memorable way to celebrate the outcome.
Do you have any familial or personal connection to the scholarship?
Rhodes Scholarship. In fact, I’m the first member of my family to pursue postgraduate study, so the scholarship wasn’t something I grew up knowing about. I only learned more about it during my time at university.
What do you plan to do after your time at Oxford? Do you think you’ll return to Tasmania?
After my time at Oxford, I hope to work as an academic – teaching in areas I’m passionate about while continuing research in mathematical ecology and biology using the skills I’ve developed as a Rhodes Scholar. I’m particularly interested in applying mathematical modelling to ecological and conservation problems, and I’d love to contribute to this growing field through both teaching and research.
Ultimately, I would love to return to Tasmania. It’s home, and I’m deeply motivated by the idea of contributing to research and education here. That said, I recognise that academic positions in Tasmania are limited, so I’ll have to see where opportunities arise. Wherever I end up, my longterm goal is to bring those experiences back and continue supporting Tasmanian science and education. No, I don’t have any direct familial or personal connection to the 24
8 –
29 November 2025
POSTCODE is about how we connect with each other. Today, we’re always online, flooded with messages and expected to be available. This project asks: if we slowed down, would our ways of talking and sharing be more thoughtful? POSTCODE asks what’s on your mind right now? As we move into 2026, do you have any hopes, reflections or concerns?
All artists and non-artists alike are invited to submit something by 28 October
bit.ly/enterpostcode
Science vs The Arts
What degree are you doing?
Doing a double degree, there is a variety of ways I can answer this question. However, it always begins with stating my science degree first Sometimes I’ll tack on Media and Communication, but often I will omit it completely. Every time I do this, I feel every writer, journalist and creative that has come before me rolling in their graves. I tell myself it’s because I’m a shallow person who wants to gloat about marine biology (true), but the recent UTAS cuts to Arts funding has gotten me thinking. Maybe my hierarchical ordering of degrees is the product of societal conditioning? Indeed, in Western society, science is considered more valuable, legitimate and useful. Science heals sick people, provides solutions for climate change, builds spaceships, and sends people to the bottom of the ocean. It is harder to articulate why the Arts are equally valuable, especially when capitalism rewards tangible moneymaking pursuits over artistic expression. But art was not always undervalued, especially in Indigenous cultures
Isabella Fung
Painting, dancing, singing and storytelling has been central to Australian First Nation’s cultures for thousands of years. Krystal de Napoli, an astrophysicist, and Gomeroi woman, describes how these practices store information by combining creative expression with scientific knowledge. ‘Aboriginal science is encoded into our Dreaming stories’, she said. ‘We store our knowledge in intricate, multi-layered, interconnected stories.’
Western society has a more complicated relationship with the Arts During the Renaissance, society embraced both art (literature, philosophy, painting) and science (mathematics, chemistry, physics) as equally important facets of a self- actualised individual. Famous artists like Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and Raphael, combined scientific invention with artistic expression, resulting in fame, status, and wealth. This, however, did not translate to members of the general public who also had lofty ideas. Art has always been a precarious profession, and even those with training relied heavily on patronage. And so, as famous artists emerged through every artistic period, so did countless
more ‘dreamers’, ‘hobbyists’, degenerates’, ‘vagabonds’, ‘hippies’ and ‘bums’. Ultimately, artists were either placed on a pedestal and worshipped, or dismissed as delusional wannabees who contributed nothing to society.
Meanwhile, science underwent a significant overhaul after the Renaissance. The Scientific Revolution ushered in the age of rational thought, where quantitative replaced qualitative reasoning, and objectivity trumped subjectivity. The Scientific Method enabled man to exert his will upon the world through identifying, partitioning and manipulating resources Through advancements in navigation, weapons, and medicine, science translated into tangible increases in power. It enabled expansion, exploitation, colonisation and control
Naturally, science and the Arts became estranged. Where science benefitted the ruling elite, art instead posed a threat Poets complained about working conditions. Writers exposed corruption. Paintings critiqued politicians. And catchy songs got stuck in your head and made it hard to concentrate…
In a post-industrial capitalist society, art was no longer useful. Unless, of course, it could be turned into cold hard cash. And we all know how difficult that is. Despite artistic fields building upon hundreds of years of collective knowledge and skills, and transformed every decade by technological advancements, they do not evoke the shiny-eyed awe and respect bestowed to science. Society does not give the thumbs- up to creative endeavours, rather, one can expect a bewildered ‘You want to do art. In this economy?’ And unfortunately, they have a point.
Professor Throsby, lead researcher in ‘The Artists as Workers report’, states;
‘In terms of university education, school education, and their training and experience, they [artists] have the same level of qualifications as managers and professionals in the workforce, but they earn about half as much as other professionals.’
This is wildly unfair, considering artists contribute just as much to societal development as science. Consider the iPhone. We can all agree it is a technological marvel. Thank you science. Yet the sleek rectangular shape, intuitive interface, engaging app design and the content we spend hours doomscrolling through every night is produced by creatives. Where’s the credit? And what about the ways we engage and benefit from the economy of our cities? Yes, production of goods and services is great. But it is the cumulative work of
architects, street artists, writers, designers and musicians that articulate the unique cultural identity of a city to both tourists and residents. Think of what MONA has done for Tasmania, or why everyone is obsessed with Melbourne. Artists generate billions of dollars in cultural capital, yet reap very little in return.
Why then, has capitalism not capitalised on artists? Well, it has By dismissing them as useless and self-indulgent, society can justify a lack of resources and union protection. Artists have no choice but to pursue their careers with little institutional support, resulting in the normalisation of exploitation, overtime, and selfsacrifice. Here, the ‘suffering artist’ trope becomes problematic It suggests artists will emerge regardless of the amount of support given, and, really, isn’t suffering and trauma a prerequisite to becoming an artist anyway?
The dichotomy between science and art also has troubling implications for the ways ndividuals perceive and engage with the world People believe a quantitative understanding will suffice, therefore, the qualitative input of art is unnecessary. In the age of AI, this has never been further from the truth For the first time in history, it has become necessary to distinguish art that has been made by humans, rather than by machines If AI replaces our capacity for artistic expression, humanity will become divorced from responding, critiquing and guiding the pertinent events of the 21 st century.
The subjective compliment to scientific inquiry, and the necessary brake on relentless scientific advancement will be compromised. Naturalist and writer, Barry Lopez, reflects on this during his travels, where he argues the lack of qualitative engagement with the Arctic has resulted in exploitation;
‘There were no provisions for painters, musicians, for novelists. If the quest for knowledge is to be useful to all, then this is a peculiar situation. Whenever we seek to take swift and efficient possession of places, our first and often only assessment is a scientific one And so our evaluations remain unfinished.’ Without art, the aesthetic, cultural, philosophical, and intrinsic value of our world cannot be appreciated Indeed, science, on its own, is incomplete and depressing.
To distil all the wonderful phenomena around us into an excel spreadsheet is reductive and dangerous. The Arts are valid and necessary, and the recent UTAS cuts are not only a blow to Arts students, but to scientists too
Reading
Coming from my line of work it’s so hard to choose books to recommend: what do you like? What’s the occasion? What level of nastiness, silliness, sentimentality, detail, existential dread or boredom are you willing to tolerate? With that in mind, I’d like to talk about the pleasures of very short books.
Corner
In a different mode, Patrick Süskind’s claustrophobic 1987 novella The Pigeon compresses a lifetime of anxiety, post-war trauma, urban loneliness, and fear into a 77 page story about a man who comes face to face with a pigeon. I have continued to think about both of these books long after I finished them, to marvel at their economy and precision as well as at their emotional complexity And the best part of very short books? You can read them more than once. This year I have read two novellas, both clocking under 100 pages, both grand examples of the phrase ‘brevity is the soul of wit’ First, The English Understand Wool (2022), Helen DeWitt’s 64-page jewel-case of a novella, which both seriously and satirically considers mother-daughter relationships, education and connoisseurship, post-colonial ethics, publishing, and the taut string that connects lies and truth.
Discipline by Randa Abdel-FattahAcclaimed author and academic Randa Abdel-Fattah’s latest novel, Discipline, opens in metropolitan Sydney in May 2021, with a cast of characters struggling to make sense of escalating settlerviolence and anti-protest hostility in occupied Palestine.
While an eventual ceasefire leaves over 200 Palestinians dead, journalist Hannah and academic Ashraf grapple with their places in mass-media and universities, and the hypocrisy laid bare in these institutions in responding to injustice.
The only Muslim-Palestinian in her newsroom, Hannah struggles under the ‘weight of representation’ as a Palestinian-Australian teenager faces terrorism charges on shaky legal grounds. At once, her identity and connections to her community are leveraged and exploited to cover the story, her own perspectives and knowledge are shut down- her stories censored, her identity making her ‘too invested’ to cover the conflict. As her colleagues cover the conflict with apparent neutrality and balance between two ‘sides’ of the conflict, Hannah pushes back between the equation between oppressor and oppressed- and questions the virtue of ‘neutrality’ in covering a settler-colonial state tightening its control over its occupied territory. Meanwhile, Abdel-Fattah interrogates the double-standards
of universities through the dejected and cynical academic Ashraf and his activist PhD student Jamal. Both Jamal and Ashraf strain under the weight of modern-day academia; a streamlining of services, an increase in the workload, a higher level of efficiency; these institutions ask for their research to have more meaning, more impact, even as that work is devalued, lauded more as diversity statistics than thinkers in their own right.
As Jamal says, universities are “built to make everyone think they have no power. We’re all supposed to accept being atomised and fragmented.”
While Jamal speaks out about the conflict within the university, urging academics to take more action, his scholarship and teaching position become precarious and Ashraf counsels him, “you need to be strategic. Give people a way to show their support without compromising their already precarious jobs ” Ashraf’s fear reflects the complexity of changing institutions from within, but also reflects a defeatism that absolves him from taking action. Jamal responds with an acuity that will stay with readers as a reminder in their own lives- as stakeholders in institutions complicit in today’s genocide: “Solidarity in the shadows isn’t solidarity It’s cowardice ”
chatCPTisGPTickingmeoff
EllaVanderzwan
If I had a dollar for every time I had learnt about a student using ChatGPT throughout the course of my degree I would have enough money to drop out of university entirely and live off the money I made. It feels like for the past eighteen months (give or take) I have slowly been losing my mind as students I respected reveal how heavily they rely on artificial intelligence. Members of my family use it without shame, students will reveal they used ChatGPT on certain assignments when it was against the guidelines, PowerPoint presentations will have AI generated images on them, individuals within the university are encouraging the use of CoPilot and ChatGPT like it’s Google.
What finally spurred me to write this article is the discovery that Launceston, my home, would be gaining an AI data centre. While people involved in the planning claim that it will be environmentally friendly because Tasmania is carbon neutral, but there are doubts if Tasmania has the amount of power required to run this, especially as droughts in Tasmania are becoming increasingly
common; according to the ABC in 2024 Hobart has had its third driest February since 1881. This comes to the greater concern; generative AI is harmful to the environment and will exasperate climate change.
Generative AI is quickly becoming an environmentally concerning, especially considering the rapid rate that it is growing. A request through ChatGPT uses 10 times the amount of energy as a single Google search (according to the International Energy Agency). According to MIT’s predictions the increase of AI is so rapid that soon the electricity consumption of all AI data centres will be level with Japan and Russia’s electricity consumption. Generative AI will likely soon be leading electricity consumption, and partially the user is to blame.
I find it really worrying our future nurses, social workers, teachers and psychologists have been using ChatGPT and other AI programs as much as they have. Recent studies such as AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking by Michael Gerlich
and Microsoft’s study, The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers, have revealed that AI is actually lowering people’s abilities to critical think, recall information and has been shown to lead to skill degeneration. These declines are very worrying things for students in all fields but particularly worrying when I’ve talked to so many psychology, education and social work students who heavily use CoPilot and ChatGPT.
Late-stage capitalism has made it so that our brains are so exhausted from the realities of living, that sometimes it feels very nice to outsource our brainpower to a language model who can find the information quicker. It’s a lot easier to read something from ChatGPT than it is to read multiple articles trying to find the answer you’re looking for. However, ChatGPT is not unbiased, and it still has an agenda. I think the extra effort is worth the human experience, the extra effort means that people’s homes are not struggling with lack of water because of the mass amount of water AI systems need to use for cooling.
So next time you think about using ChatGPT to look up easily searchable information, consider the impacts it has. Both on your brain, but also on the environment.
While AI may have a place, I highly doubt its place is coming up with trivia night questions (a real thing I experienced recently, half of the answers were wrong because of this) and I highly doubt that its place is coming up with Easter-based puns (also another thing I witnessed!) The cost of having a brain is figuring out problems and being creative. If we outsource a crucial part of the human experience to a language model what does that make us?
takes
By Erin Coull
HOROSCOPES,
A SCEPTIC’S CANDY SHOP?
BETH HANLEY
While not a new or foreign concept to Generation Z or Millennials, I couldn’t help but ponder the value of zodiac signs in today’s society and how they influence the way we interact with one another Informed by the stars and our birthdays, these astrological signs supposedly suggest that the exact time and date of our birth can shape our personality How this is even remotely backed by science is beyond me—but ever since I stumbled into astrology at the ripe age of 18, I’ve found myself reflecting on its surprising accuracy and also its potential absurdity.
I’m a Libra. According to the stars, that makes me sociable, artistic, and diplomatic. Honestly, not the worst traits to have. One might even say those are solid characteristics to look for in a friend or romantic partner. But then I remembered: Vladimir Putin is also a Libra
Now, would I date Vladimir Putin? Personally HELL NO But according to astrology, we share a cosmic blueprint. So what does that say about me? Am I just one ice hockey match and shirtless horse-riding session away from becoming a power-hungry dictator? I really hope not. And that moment of realization sparked a deeper question: what does being a certain zodiac sign actually mean? Is it a reliable guide, or is it all just a bunch of celestial BS? You may not care for either answer but I thought it was interesting.
Since learning what the signs supposedly reveal, I’ve caught myself asking friends- both potential and current- what their sign is and then quietly analysing whether that makes us compatible Worse still, I’ve done this with people I’ve crushed on. Yep, I’m guilty of scrolling through birth charts and compatibility charts like it’s background research for an arts essay (one which I would totally
get a HD on). These ‘signs’ have made their way into our music and film industries (quoted and eloquently put in the song Hair Tie by SKYLAR) and supposedly comprise a large reason for a lot of our personality.
For instance, Gemini women are meant to be adaptable and charming and Aries men are supposedly born leaders. But I myself know some incredibility set and rude Gemini women and inherently timid male Aries
While part of me finds the zodiac world fascinating, a poetic way of trying to understand people and the universe, another part of me wonders if it’s turned me into a bit of a skeptic, or worse, someone who unintentionally judges others based on traits they may or may not even have, all because of the day they were born
I like to believe that astrology hasn't dictated too much of my life or social choices, but if I’m being honest, my inner monologue probably has some strong opinions to the contrary. The reality is this: if someone in your life is a total twat, it’s probably not because they were born under a certain star sign. They might just be a twat Similarly, being born in May doesn’t guarantee someone is open-minded and versatile because, frankly, that’s not exactly how I’d describe Pauline Hanson
So, in the end, while astrology can be fun and even insightful at times, it shouldn’t be used as a moral compass or a substitute for genuine understanding Maybe the stars know something we don’t—or maybe we’re all just looking for meaning in the chaos. Either way, a little selfawareness goes a lot further than a star sign ever could
rolling out a uni-wide 2025 diary design competition l ast year on their socials. I saw this as an opportunity to showcase my work, and get my name out there - as an emerging artist does. I spent several hours gaining inspiration, developing an artwork pl an, and executing the piece on my iPad using digital art software.
that I’m happy with To my surprise and gratitude, I was lucky enough to win the competition. I won $150, plus an additional $50 for my art to be used for the conjoining calendar.
At the time, I was overjoyed that my work was recognised. But now some time has passed to reflect on this work.
I was lucky enough to travel overseas to meet with other Indigenous groups and through our shared discussions of remarkably similar situations I realise now what the flow-on affects of the situation truly were: cutting costs; cutting arts.
king on l atively e years re and e to a tworks
TUSA is by no means a lone wolf either, there are many institutions, organisations and corporations that need educating in the financial value of art. Rather than paying a professional an adequate wage to complete a job, they have taken on emerging artists who often undervalue their work, paying them minimally in an unprofessional manner; with gift cards. They spin up a “competition” to entice entries
n s ' e t h i
o m a n )
from student art paying us a livin work (in line wi Association of V rough idea of the be around $500 design alone, as University Alumni Artist Bec Adamcz If this was any other industry, eyebrows would be raised.
And to make a rainy day thunder; there was no licensing agreement between myself and TUSA, and no consideration of ICIP (Indigenous Cultural Intellectual Property), aka protocols around fair use and value of Indigenous knowledges Next time its l abor o Country, m design. An much it mi my culture
And by no that every profession believe in truly passi causes t coll aborati individuals want to do for free.
intentions behind it, it’s so crucial to learn the full picture of the situation and strive to do better by the people you support in the future.
My message to artists: advocate for yourself, your art Your time and work isn’t worth peanuts. Get your name out there on your own
LAOSHI | 老师
BY ALEXANDER POIRIER
Dedicated to my laoshi in yangqin, Hu Lei (胡磊), the humble woman who taught me so much of what I know about Chinese music, something critical to my musical identity
Featuring classics of the Chinese canon Chinese and symphony orchestras and modern works inspired by tradition
.FantasiaoftheTerracotta
It was Hu Lei laoshi (胡磊) that taught me everything I know about playing the yangqin (扬琴), something critical to my musical identity now Right after the 2020 lockdown were my first proper lessons, arriving at her house where she offered me tea and all sorts of sweet treats Here I learnt how to “reflect” the hammer to make a better sound, and how to evolve my playing from that of a “little mosquito” to a “buzzing bee”
This humble woman was a traditional music tutor at the Beijing Dance Academy (the alma mater of Li Cunxin, the former Artistic Director of the Queensland Ballet), and was the yangqin performer in the soundtrack of Mao’s Last Dancer (the biography of Li Cunxin) She originally arrived in Australia in 1989, choosing Hobart as her new home For over a decade, she performed in a Chinese restaurant to make ends meet even now, there are still no fulltime positions in Australia for Chinese music performers
I wanted to put together a playlist of works that I have learned from her: their histories and stories, to play in concerts of the Sydney Conservatorium Chinese Music Ensemble or Sydney Chinese Orchestra, or to prepare for my Central Conservatory examinations
To listen to all 30 pieces in Alex’s playlist scan this code in Spotify.
Whatyouneed toknowabout thepubsin Hobart
THESHAMROCK
In need of a quick but delicious parmigiana, steak or just a beer? The Shamrock is the place to go! Scrummy food, inviting atmosphere and wonderful staff our #1 suggestion would be either a classic steak or the garlic pizza with a side of pepper gravy to dip (sounds weird but TRUST us)
SHIPWRIGHTARMS
Situated in the quaint (and slightly boujee) Battery Point, the Shipwright Arms (Shippies) is another gorgeous spot for your next pub meal. Well regarded for it’s historic charm and delicious and vast options both on tap and on your plate this venue is a Hobart classic! As an old-school pub,this is a must attend on a cold winter’s night
PRINCEOFWALES
With such a relaxing atmosphere with the sun streaming in, this is the PERFECT pub for weary travellers and uni students. Equipped with friendly staff, beautiful food and well priced meals, this is Hobart classic you cannot miss
CASCADEBREWERY
Whether you’re wanting a yummy platter with the finest Tasmanian cheeses and cold meats, a pint of Hobart’s speciality (Cascade), or a seriously mind testing trivia night the Brewery has you covered. Nestled in South Hobart under Kunyani do not be decieved, the pub has a beautifully warm fire and accomodating staff to keep ypu well looked after
MAYFAIR
The mayfair is a well frequented spot for Uni students and Monday trivia lovers Never forget they have half-priced cocktails on Fridays 5-7pm (in girl math they’re basically free at that point). With a super cute bar and inviting atmosphere, when you’re done being social they conveniently have a bottle-o out the back to grab a bottle of wine before heading home. Only downside to this one is that they’re ALWAYS packed so book a table!
PUB REVIEWS
DRSYNTAX
Cramped bars not your thing? Do you like more or a beer garden tyoe of vibe? Well Dr Syntax has you covered. With a couple of excellent pool tables to keep the sporty people entertained this venue offers top of the line parmi’s and a lip smacking cider to go with it. The perfect summer outing with your mates
CRESCENTHOTEL
Situated in West Hobart the Crescent Hotel offers everythig from a warm cozy bar to a gorgeous beer garden that is the perfect location for a weekend celebration or weekday pub meal. Offering a few different dishes to your standard watering hole the hotel is equipped with many delicious vegetarian and carnivore options! Pair it with a pleasant sauvy b or pint of cascade lager and you’re on you way to enjoy a gorgeous evening!
IRISHMURPHY’S
Major slays all round at the Irish, classic food and drink with an intoxicating atmosphere. The gorgeous sandstone facade is a staple for front of house and inside is a pub go-ers dream. Gorgeous old bar and new-ish pool tables its the best place to hide away and have a pint after a long day at the keyboard.
A popular hang out spot for any and all individuals (including us Uni student plebs) the New Sydney is sold as ‘the best Irish pub in town’ shh don’t tell Irish Murphy’s! Regardless of publican rivalries, this hotel really should be a spot on your go-to list. With top of the line on-tap Guinness, local gins and some delish cuisine, the New Sydney Hotel also has a killer beer garden and stunning atmosphere It’s just wicked!
chcek out our new website
The opinions expressed herein are not those of the editors, the publishers, the University of Tasmania, or the Tasmanian University Student Association. Reasonable care is taken to ensure that the content and information included is as up-to-date and accurate as possible at the time of publication, but no responsibility can be taken towards Togatus for any errors or omissions.
If you have concerns or questions about anything that has been published, contact the Editor-In-Chief, Evelyn Unwin Tew, by email. Cover design by Imogen Coote. Interior design by Evelyn Unwin Tew & Beth Hanley.
Some of the art used throughout this edition are public access artworks. If you would like to know more, please contact us.
