Today's CAROLINIAN - January 2017 Issue

Page 1

Today’s CAROLINIAN

http://todayscarolinian.net

1

Illustration by Justine Patrice Bacareza

Death Penalty Bill Approval Sparks Dispute Joen Jacob Ramas On Dec. 7, 2016, the highly-controversial Death Penalty Bill was approved by the House of Representatives Justice Committee and is up for third and final reading before its passage into the Senate. The House Justice Committee approved the bill with votes 12-6 and one abstinence. The bill, also known as House Bill 01, imposes death penalty on commission of 20 heinous crimes such as qualified bribery, rape, plunder, drug-related crimes, treason, and carnapping, to name a few. Proposed modes of execution are by hanging, through a firing squad, or through lethal injection. After Marcos’ authoritarian reign during the era of Martial Law, death penalty was deposed in the 1987 Constitution which prohibits the said punishment but allows the Congress to reinstate it for “heinous crimes.” In 1993, death penalty was reinstated under President Fidel Ramos’ term. It was abolished in 2006 during the term of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, reducing the maximum punishment to life imprisonment. The abolishment of death penalty in 2006 commuted

1,230 death row inmates to life imprisonment in what Amnesty International says is the “largest ever commutation of death sentences.” However, with the increasing number of drugrelated crimes, majority of the members of Congress are bound to endorse the bill. At least 8 of the 20 proposed heinous crimes punishable by death are related to drugs. President Rodrigo Duterte, a promoter of death penalty since his campaign, is pleased that the bill is going expeditiously, as this improves the administration’s war on drugs. In a speech during Senator Manny Pacquiao’s 38th birthday celebration in General Santos City on December 17, 2016, Duterte said he will push through with daily executions of five to six people as soon as the death penalty is revived. Vice President Leni Robredo, a vocal advocate against death penalty, says that the reinstatement of this punishment violates international protocol. The Philippines is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR),

entered into by the country in 2007. The ICCPR lays down specific provisions for member states to respect and observe fundamental freedoms which includes freedom from cruel, inhumane or degrading punishment. However, House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, in argument to Robredo’s stand, stated that the Constitution is above any international protocol. The country’s most popular priests, Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle of Manila and Archbishop Soc Villegas of Lingayen-Dagupan, are firm in their stand that every life has hope. Tagle, in an advent recollection, stated that the reinstatement of the death penalty is an “act of hopelessness and despair.” It was backed by Villegas in a prayer-rally on Dec. 14, 2016. “We are not protesting without a solution. We are protesting with an alternative — reform the criminal justice system,” Villegas said. Although it is still to undergo a series of debates, discussions and revisions, legislators from the lower and upper houses are positive that the bill will be approved in the soonest possible time. TC


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.