Magazine Supplement Issue 3

Page 1

MOTORING

SUPPLEMENT

THE WEEKLY OBSERVER WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

No Country for Fast Cars If owning a Lamborghini is self-indulgence, driving one in India is a lesson in self-control Shantanu

L

amborghini, one of the world’s best-known makers of sports cars, builds machines for speed. They can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in 4 seconds and hit 350 km/h with ease. So what’s a car designed for European autobahns and high-speed motorways doing on India’s rutted and pot-holed roads, punctuated with speed breakers and sundry cattle? Simple. It costs over Rs.2 crores to own one. When Lamborghini opened its first showroom in Mumbai in 2012, its executives knew they had a potential market among India’s wealthy. Businessmen, celebrity sportsmen, showbiz types and their insufferable children, need that special something to remind the world how extraordinary they are. What could be more glamorous to flaunt than a canary-yellow spaceship on wheels? But not even Lamborghini’s CEO, no stranger to the anxieties of the rich and famous, could have imagined the desperation he was about to encounter. He had hoped to sell 50 cars in 3 years; he ended up selling 250 in a matter of months! With its inexplicable fondness for speed breakers, there is perhaps no country less suited to driving a supercar than India. The Huracan, one of Lamborghini’s most popular models, has a ground clearance of 0.13 metres or 5 inches. The Indian Roads Congress recommends that speed breakers must be “0.10 metres (or 4.3 inches)

in height in the form of a rounded hump measuring 3.7 metres in width for a crossing speed of 25km/h.” In reality, speed breakers on our roads appear from nowhere and often exceed 6 inches in height. A pot hole has no known specification to qualify as one and can range from a few inches to several feet in depth. The speed limit on Indian expressways is120 km/h. The entry-level Lamborghini, the Gallardo, or the new generation Huracan can break that in 5 seconds flat. It is little wonder that there have been so many cases of amateur drivers crashing their Lamborghinis or, in their efforts to test the car’s limits, causing their engines to catch fire. With just a light touch to the accelerator, there’s a massive air intake and the V12 6000 cc engine roars to life. Press down a bit and the car takes off like a jet.

A couple of years ago, a valet at Le Meridian Delhi crashed a Lamborghini causing the owner Rs.2 crore in damages. Next, a Lamborghini Murcielago crashed near India Gate when the driver lost control. Recently a BJP MLA’s wife crashed a saffron Huracan into a stationary autorickshaw in a crowded Mumbai suburb. Says Digvijay Tyagi, a mixed martial artist by profession who owns a fleet of superbikes and luxury cars, “There is no fun in driving a Gallardo coupe even on Delhi roads. Owning a supercar in India is utter nonsense.” He says it makes more sense to buy a big luxury SUV than a supercar. “Even superbikes are much better machines to roll on than these supercars.” Driving a Lamborghini seated just few inches off the ground, the driver knows all too well what a pothole feels like: a real bummer. To turn the car around you need the width of two average Indian roads. But for our rock-star college kids that’s no problem. Since the point in owning a sports car is simply to show off, it matters little if it’s mostly parked or crawling in dense traffic or being towed to repair. You can always rev your engine in neutral gear to relieve the boredom or tease your eardrums. And it’s a great prop in selfies. Isn’t that what owning a Lamborghini in India is all about?

Formula for Failure The dominance of technology over driving skills has cost F1 racing its coveted place Rishiraj Bhagawati

T

he recent Singapore Grand Prix witnessed 22 of the fastest cars on the planet race the spectacular Marina Bay Street Circuit under blinding floodlights.The finest racing drivers in the world manoeuvred these V6 machines through the streets of the Lion City for 61 laps, before the winner and the runner-up raced past the chequered flag with just eight tenths of a second separating them. Quite extraordinarily, this close contest between some of the best combinations of engineering talent and driving skills in the world barely found mention in the next day’s international newspapers. No, it wasn’t a problem with the Singapore circuit, which to its merit has achieved the unthinkable by hosting night races year after year on a track not originally designed for racing. Rather it’s Formula One itself that is slowly losing its buzz and staring at a potential wipe-out from the sports world. The Grand Prix Drivers’ Association issued a statement early this year to the FIA chairman Bernie Ecclestone voicing their criticism of the way the sport is run. Ticket sales have gone down dramatically since 2008 and by over 7% in just the last two years. Cost of broadcast rights has come down and even Google trends show a dip in online searches. Today, not many outside the world of motorsport

“Ticket sales have gone down dramatically since 2008 and by over 7% in just the last two years. ”

care much about these races. If one wakes up on a Sunday morning and already has a fair idea about which car on the grid will eventually finish where, there is little incentive to even follow the race on Twitter. Things were not always so grim. A few decades ago F1 was one of the most followed sports in the world. It had established its space in people’s imagination after the advent of television. For instance, the rain-soaked Silverstone GP of 1988 gave us the first glimpse of Ayrton Senna’s incredible skills when he drove against all odds and emerged champion. He went on to win the World Championship that year

for McLaren-Honda and gave his countrymen something to celebrate. Soon after that he became a role model for the whole of Brazil, which at the time was struggling to come out of poverty and unemployment. People looked up to him as an inspiration from their everyday problems. Since then, the sport has undergone a plethora of changes both in administrative and track regulations. The most apparent -- and perhaps the most destructive -- is that the sport is now far too mechanised for drivers to make a difference anymore. It has become more about the engineering and design of the car and less about the driver’s skills and risk-taking ability. This has resulted in an anodyne contest on the track and, with drivers almost never risking car damage orfighting for a win anymore, the very ethos of Formula One is defeated. The future of the sport is also threatened by the unorganised and biased management of the sport. Bernie Ecclestone, CEO of the Formula One Group who owns its commercial rights, along with the FIA and a few private companies dictate the business model of the sport. They financially reward certain teams irrespective of their performance and make it difficult for their less-favoured rivals to compete. In the absence of a level playing field, competition will naturally be anything but fierce and lead to a predictable outcome.If the administration, however, finds a way to make the sport less engineering-focussed and its own functioning more transparent, we may once again witness the raw pleasure of racing that F1 once stood for.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Magazine Supplement Issue 3 by IIJNM Bangalore - Issuu